BCGS Relationship Chart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

RELATIONSHIP CHART How to use this chart to determine the relationship between any two people in a family. 1. Identify the Common Ancestor of the two people. Locate the box in the upper left corner for the Common Ancestor. 2. Across the top row of the chart, find the relationship of one of the two people to their Common Ancestor. 3. Down the left column of the chart, find the relationship of the second person to their Common Ancestor. 4. Read down the column of the first person and across the chart on the row of the second person. Where the two intersect is the box which identifies their relationship. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Great G-G 3G 4G 5G 6G 7G COMMON Son/ Grand- Grand- Grand- Grand- Grand- Grand- Grand- Grand- ANCESTOR Daughter Child Child Child Child Child Child Child Child Grand Great Grand G-G Grand 3G Grand 4G Grand- 5G Grand- 6G Grand- Son/ Brother/ Nephew/ Nephew/ Nephew/ Nephew/ Nephew/ Nephew/ Nephew/ Nephew/ 1 Daughter Sister Niece Niece Niece Niece Niece Niece Niece Niece First Cousin First Cousin First Cousin First Cousin First Cousin First Cousin First Cousin Grand- Nephew/ Cousin Once Twice 3X 4X 5X 6X 7X 2 Child Niece Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Grand First Cousin 2nd Cousin 2nd Cousin 2nd Cousin 2nd Cousin 2nd Cousin 2nd Cousin Great Grand- 2nd Nephew/ Once Once Twice 3X 4X 5X 6X 3 Child Cousin Niece Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed G-G Great Grand- First Cousin 2nd Cousin 3rd Cousin 3rd Cousin 3rd Cousin 3rd Cousin 3rd Cousin 3rd Grand- Nephew/ Twice Once Once Twice 3X 4X 5X 4 Cousin Child Niece Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 3G G-G Grand First Cousin 2nd Cousin 3rd Cousin 4th Cousin 4th Cousin 4th Cousin 4th Cousin 4th Grand- Nephew/ 3X Twice Once Once Twice 3X 4X 5 Cousin Child Niece Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 4G 3G Grand First Cousin 2nd Cousin 3rd Cousin 4th Cousin 5th Cousin 5th Cousin 5th Cousin 5th Grand- Nephew/ 4X 3X Twice Once Once Twice 3X 6 Cousin Child Niece Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 5G 4G Grand- First Cousin 2nd Cousin 3rd Cousin 4th Cousin 5th Cousin 6th Cousin 6th Cousin 6th Grand- Nephew/ 5X 4X 3X Twice Once Once Twice 7 Cousin Child Niece Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 6G 5G Grand- First Cousin 2nd Cousin 3rd Cousin 4th Cousin 5th Cousin 6th Cousin 7th Cousin 7th Grand- Nephew/ 6X 5X 4X 3X Twice Once Once 8 Cousin Child Niece Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 7G 6G Grand- First Cousin 2nd Cousin 3rd Cousin 4th Cousin 5th Cousin 6th Cousin 7th Cousin 8th Grand- Nephew/ 7X 6X 5X 4X 3X Twice Once 9 Cousin Child Niece Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed G-G = Great-Great 3G = Third Great 4G = Fourth Great… 3X = Three Times 4X = Four Times… Removed = Generations Removed. © 2011 Berks County Genealogical Society – www.berksgenes.org .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Undertanding Human Relations (Kinship Systems) Laurent Dousset
Undertanding Human Relations (Kinship Systems) Laurent Dousset To cite this version: Laurent Dousset. Undertanding Human Relations (Kinship Systems). N. Thieberger. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork, Oxford University Press, pp.209-234, 2011. halshs-00653097 HAL Id: halshs-00653097 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00653097 Submitted on 6 Feb 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Published as: Dousset, Laurent 2011. « Undertanding Human Relations (Kinship Systems) », in N. Thieberger (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 209-234 The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork Edited by Nick Thieberger Oxford University Press Laurent Dousset EHESS (Advanced School for Social Studies) CREDO (Centre de Recherche et de Documentation sur l’Océanie) 3 place Victor Hugo F – 13003 Marseilles [email protected] Part four: Collaborating with other disciplines Chapter 13 : Anthropology / Ethnography. Understanding human relations (kinship systems). Kungkankatja, minalinkatja was the answer of an elderly man to my question, 'How come you call your cousins as if they were your siblings?', when I expected to hear different words, one for sibling and one for cousin.
[Show full text]
Placement of Children with Relatives
STATE STATUTES Current Through January 2018 WHAT’S INSIDE Placement of Children With Giving preference to relatives for out-of-home Relatives placements When a child is removed from the home and placed Approving relative in out-of-home care, relatives are the preferred placements resource because this placement type maintains the child’s connections with his or her family. In fact, in Placement of siblings order for states to receive federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, federal law under title Adoption by relatives IV-E of the Social Security Act requires that they Summaries of state laws “consider giving preference to an adult relative over a nonrelated caregiver when determining a placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant state child protection standards.”1 Title To find statute information for a IV-E further requires all states2 operating a title particular state, IV-E program to exercise due diligence to identify go to and provide notice to all grandparents, all parents of a sibling of the child, where such parent has legal https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ custody of the sibling, and other adult relatives of the laws-policies/state/. child (including any other adult relatives suggested by the parents) that (1) the child has been or is being removed from the custody of his or her parents, (2) the options the relative has to participate in the care and placement of the child, and (3) the requirements to become a foster parent to the child.3 1 42 U.S.C.
[Show full text]
Kinship Terminology
Fox (Mesquakie) Kinship Terminology IVES GODDARD Smithsonian Institution A. Basic Terms (Conventional List) The Fox kinship system has drawn a fair amount of attention in the ethno graphic literature (Tax 1937; Michelson 1932, 1938; Callender 1962, 1978; Lounsbury 1964). The terminology that has been discussed consists of the basic terms listed in §A, with a few minor inconsistencies and errors in some cases. Basically these are the terms given by Callender (1962:113-121), who credits the terminology given by Tax (1937:247-254) as phonemicized by CF. Hockett. Callender's terms include, however, silent corrections of Tax from Michelson (1938) or fieldwork, or both. (The abbreviations are those used in Table l.)1 Consanguines Grandparents' Generation (1) nemesoha 'my grandfather' (GrFa) (2) no hkomesa 'my grandmother' (GrMo) Parents' Generation (3) nosa 'my father' (Fa) (4) nekya 'my mother' (Mo [if Ego's female parent]) (5) nesekwisa 'my father's sister' (Pat-Aunt) (6) nes'iseha 'my mother's brother' (Mat-Unc) (7) nekiha 'my mother's sister' (Mo [if not Ego's female parent]) 'Other abbreviations used are: AI = animate intransitive; AI + O = tran- sitivized AI; Ch = child; ex. = example; incl. = inclusive; m = male; obv. = obviative; pi. = plural; prox. = proximate; sg. = singular; TA = transitive ani mate; TI-0 = objectless transitive inanimate; voc. = vocative; w = female; Wi = wife. Some citations from unpublished editions of texts by Alfred Kiyana use abbreviations: B = Buffalo; O = Owl (for these, see Goddard 1990a:340). 244 FOX
[Show full text]
Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with At-Risk Families
ISSUE BRIEF January 2013 Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With At-Risk Families Parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) is a family-centered What’s Inside: treatment approach proven effective for abused and at-risk children ages 2 to 8 and their caregivers—birth parents, • What makes PCIT unique? adoptive parents, or foster or kin caregivers. During PCIT, • Key components therapists coach parents while they interact with their • Effectiveness of PCIT children, teaching caregivers strategies that will promote • Implementation in a child positive behaviors in children who have disruptive or welfare setting externalizing behavior problems. Research has shown that, as a result of PCIT, parents learn more effective parenting • Resources for further information techniques, the behavior problems of children decrease, and the quality of the parent-child relationship improves. Child Welfare Information Gateway Children’s Bureau/ACYF 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW Eighth Floor Washington, DC 20024 800.394.3366 Email: [email protected] Use your smartphone to https:\\www.childwelfare.gov access this issue brief online. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With At-Risk Families https://www.childwelfare.gov This issue brief is intended to build a better of the model, which have been experienced understanding of the characteristics and by families along the child welfare continuum, benefits of PCIT. It was written primarily to such as at-risk families and those with help child welfare caseworkers and other confirmed reports of maltreatment or neglect, professionals who work with at-risk families are described below. make more informed decisions about when to refer parents and caregivers, along with their children, to PCIT programs.
[Show full text]
What Is a Child & Family Team Meeting?
What is a Child & Family Team When is a Child & Family Team Meeting Location and Time Meeting? Meeting Necessary? We believe that Child & Family Team Meetings should be conducted at a mutu- A Child & Family Team Meeting (CFT) is A child has been found to be at high risk. ally agreeable and accessible location/time a strength based meeting that brings to- A child is at risk of out of home place- that maximizes opportunities for family gether your family, natural supports, and ment. participation. Please let us know your pref- formal resources. The meeting is lead by a Prior to the removal of a child from his erences regarding the time and location of trained facilitator to ensure that all partici- home. your meeting. pants have an opportunity to be involved Prior to a placement change of a child and heard. The purpose of the meeting is already in care. You have the right to…. to address the needs of your family and to Have your rights explained to you in a Prior to a change in a child’s perma- manner which is clear build upon its strengths. The goal of the nency goal. process is to enable your child(ren) to re- When requested by a parent, social main safely at home whenever possible. Receive written information or interpre- worker, or youth. tation in your native language. When there are multiple agencies in- The purpose of the Child & volved. Read, review, and receive written infor- At other critical decision points. mation regarding your child’s record Family Team Meeting is upon request.
[Show full text]
Convention on the Rights of the Child
Convention on the Rights of the Child Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989 entry into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with article 49 Preamble The States Parties to the present Convention, Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Bearing in mind that the peoples of the United Nations have, in the Charter, reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights and in the dignity and worth of the human person, and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Recognizing that the United Nations has, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the International Covenants on Human Rights, proclaimed and agreed that everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth therein, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, Recalling that, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations has proclaimed that childhood is entitled to special care and assistance, Convinced that the family, as the fundamental group of society and the natural environment for the growth and well-being of all its members and particularly children, should be afforded
[Show full text]
How Understanding the Aboriginal Kinship System Can Inform Better
How understanding the Aboriginal Kinship system can inform better policy and practice: social work research with the Larrakia and Warumungu Peoples of the Northern Territory Submitted by KAREN CHRISTINE KING BSW A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Social Work Faculty of Arts and Science Australian Catholic University December 2011 2 STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP AND SOURCES This thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have qualified for or been awarded another degree or diploma. No other person‟s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of the thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. All research procedures reported in the thesis received the approval of the Australian Catholic University Human Research Ethics Committee. Karen Christine King BSW 9th March 2012 3 4 ABSTRACT This qualitative inquiry explored the kinship system of both the Larrakia and Warumungu peoples of the Northern Territory with the aim of informing social work theory and practice in Australia. It also aimed to return information to the knowledge holders for the purposes of strengthening Aboriginal ways of knowing, being and doing. This study is presented as a journey, with the oral story-telling traditions of the Larrakia and Warumungu embedded and laced throughout. The kinship system is unpacked in detail, and knowledge holders explain its benefits in their lives along with their support for sharing this knowledge with social workers.
[Show full text]
Foster Care and Adoption Parenting Application PDF Document
Form K-902-2286 Revised October 2014 FOSTER CARE AND ADOPTION PARENTING APPLICATION CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES (CPS) – PLACEMENT, ICPC, AND FAD Purpose: This form gathers information about a foster or adoption applicant’s demographic and personal information. This information is used by DFPS staff during the home assessment period. Instructions: In this form, “Applicant #1” is the prospective foster or adoptive parent. “Applicant #2” is that person’s spouse. Information about an adult caregiver other than a spouse who will be in the home helping to care for the child may be included in the “Applicant #2” column. To complete this form, provide all of the information outlined. Only one form per household needs to be completed. If more space is needed, use another sheet of paper. Directions: Complete this form and give it to your FAD worker once completed. FAD keeps this form secure in the family’s case record. Texas Government Code §559.002 gives you the right to know what information is collected about you by means of a form you submit to a state government agency. You can receive and review this information, and request that incorrect information about you be corrected, by contacting the person or unit to whom you submitted this form. For questions, contact the person who gave you this form. INFORMATION MEETING/ORIENTATION ATTENDANCE DATE: FAMILY INFORMATION Foster/Adoptive Family Name Home Telephone Number Email Address: Can you receive Word Document attachments? Yes No Residence Address (Street, City, State, Zip) Mailing Address (if different) County: School District: Directions to the Home: DEMOGRAPHICS Applicant #1 Applicant #2 or Adult Caregiver Full Name: First, Middle, Last Prior Names: Maiden, Previous Married, or Alias Gender: Cell Phone: Date of Birth: Social Security Number: Driver's License Number: Racial or Ethnic Background: What languages do you speak? Place of Birth: (city, state) How long have you lived in Texas? Citizenship: Are you a U.S.
[Show full text]
Formal Analysis of Kinship Terminologies and Its Relationship to What Constitutes Kinship (Complete Text)
MATHEMATICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURAL THEORY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL VOLUME 1 NO. 1 PAGE 1 OF 46 NOVEMBER 2000 FORMAL ANALYSIS OF KINSHIP TERMINOLOGIES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO WHAT CONSTITUTES KINSHIP (COMPLETE TEXT) 1 DWIGHT W. READ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90035 [email protected] Abstract The goal of this paper is to relate formal analysis of kinship terminologies to a better understanding of who, culturally, are defined as our kin. Part I of the paper begins with a brief discussion as to why neither of the two claims: (1) kinship terminologies primarily have to do with social categories and (2) kinship terminologies are based on classification of genealogically specified relationships traced through genitor and genetrix, is adequate as a basis for a formal analysis of a kinship terminology. The social category argument is insufficient as it does not account for the logic uncovered through the formalism of rewrite rule analysis regarding the distribution of kin types over kin terms when kin terms are mapped onto a genealogical grid. Any formal account must be able to account at least for the results obtained through rewrite rule analysis. Though rewrite rule analysis has made the logic of kinship terminologies more evident, the second claim must also be rejected for both theoretical and empirical reasons. Empirically, ethnographic evidence does not provide a consistent view of how genitors and genetrixes should be defined and even the existence of culturally recognized genitors is debatable for some groups. In addition, kinship relations for many groups are reckoned through a kind of kin term calculus independent of genealogical connections.
[Show full text]
In Search of Your Immigrant Ancestor! a Resource to Introduce Youth Ages 12 to 14 Years to Genealogy at Home, in School, Or in Youth Groups Created by John H
In Search of Your Immigrant Ancestor! A Resource to Introduce Youth Ages 12 to 14 Years to Genealogy at Home, in School, or in Youth Groups Created by John H. Althouse AGS Genealogy for Youth Project Project Youth for Genealogy AGS Copyright © 2019 Alberta Genealogical Society All rights reserved This publication is the sole property of the Alberta Genealogical Society. It is meant for the use of school classes, youth groups, or individual families who wish to introduce genealogy and / or family history to children and youth. The publication may be downloaded and used exclusively for this purpose. The publication is free. No one shall sell or otherwise collect or receive financial benefit for this resource. Alberta Genealogical Society, #162, 14315 -118 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta T5L 4S6 Canada. Resource Created by John H. Althouse, BA, B Ed, Ed Diploma BOOKS IN THIS SERIES: AGS Genealogy for Youth Project Series My Family Now and in the Past! A Resource to Introduce Children Ages 6 to 8 years to Genealogy at Home, in School, or in Youth Groups Our Family Home - Here in Alberta and Far Away! A Resource to Introduce Children Ages 9 to 11 Years to Genealogy at Home, in School, or in Youth Groups In Search of Your Immigrant Ancestor! A Resource to Introduce Youth Ages 12 to 14 Years to Genealogy at Home, in School, or in Youth Groups (additional books in future) CANADIAN CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATIONS DATA John H. Althouse, 1946 – ISBN 978 - 1 - 55194 - 071 - 7 This publication as a pdf document will be available on the Alberta Genealogy website at http://www.abgenealogy.ca/ The images in this publication are reproduced with the permission of the holders as indicated on “Credits” p.57.
[Show full text]
All in the Family: Attitudes Towards Cousin Marriages Among Young Dutch People from Various Ethnic Groups
Original Evolution, Mind and Behaviour 15(2017), 1–15 article DOI: 10.1556/2050.2017.0001 ALL IN THE FAMILY: ATTITUDES TOWARDS COUSIN MARRIAGES AMONG YOUNG DUTCH PEOPLE FROM VARIOUS ETHNIC GROUPS ABRAHAM P. BUUNK* Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague and University of Groningen, The Netherlands (Received: 11 August 2016; accepted: 01 February 2017) Abstract. The present research examined attitudes towards cousin marriages among young people from various ethnic groups living in The Netherlands. The sample consisted of 245 participants, with a mean age of 21, and included 107 Dutch, 69 Moroccans, and 69 Turks. The parents of the latter two groups came from countries where cousin marriages are accepted. Participants reported more negative than positive attitudes towards cousin marriage, and women reported more negative attitudes than did men. The main objection against marrying a cousin was that it is wrong for religious reasons, whereas the risk of genetic defects was considered less important. Moroccans had less negative attitudes than both the Dutch and the Turks, who did not differ from each other. Among Turks as well as among Moroccans, a more positive attitude towards cousin marriage was predicted independently by a preference for parental control of mate choice and religiosity. This was not the case among the Dutch. Discussion focuses upon the differences between Turks and Moroccans, on the role of parental control of mate choice and religiosity, and on the role of incest avoidance underlying attitudes towards cousin marriage. Keywords: cousin marriage, consanguineity, Turks, Moroccans ATTITUDES TOWARDS COUSIN MARRIAGE The large cultural and historical variation in the attitudes towards cousin marriages suggests that there is not a universal, evolved mechanism against mating with cousins (cf.
[Show full text]
An Essential Dichotomy in Australian Kinship Tony Jefferies
11 Close–Distant: An Essential Dichotomy in Australian Kinship Tony Jefferies Abstract This chapter looks at the evidence for the close–distant dichotomy in the kinship systems of Australian Aboriginal societies. The close– distant dichotomy operates on two levels. It is the distinction familiar to Westerners from their own culture between close and distant relatives: those we have frequent contact with as opposed to those we know about but rarely, or never, see. In Aboriginal societies, there is a further distinction: those with whom we share our quotidian existence, and those who live at some physical distance, with whom we feel a social and cultural commonality, but also a decided sense of difference. This chapter gathers a substantial body of evidence to indicate that distance, both physical and genealogical, is a conception intrinsic to the Indigenous understanding of the function and purpose of kinship systems. Having done so, it explores the implications of the close–distant dichotomy for the understanding of pre-European Aboriginal societies in general—in other words: if the dichotomy is a key factor in how Indigenes structure their society, what does it say about the limits and integrity of the societies that employ that kinship system? 363 SKIN, KIN AND CLAN Introduction Kinship is synonymous with anthropology. Morgan’s (1871) Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family is one of the founding documents of the discipline. It also has an immediate connection to Australia: one of the first fieldworkers to assist Morgan in gathering his data was Lorimer Fison, who, later joined by A.
[Show full text]