The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order

TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 TRANSPORT AND WORKS (APPLICATIONS AND OBJECTIONS PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND AND WALES) RULES 2006 THE NETWORK RAIL (WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION) ORDER

Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Rule 10(2)(d)

140365-NWR-CNT- Document Reference EEN-000007 Author Network Rail

Date December 2016

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

[Page intentionally blank] The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

CONTENTS

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ...... 2 1.1 Background ...... 2 1.2 The Consent Process and Consultation ...... 4 2. THE CONSULTATION STRATEGY ...... 6 2.1 Community Consultation...... 6 2.2 Stakeholder Consultation...... 6 2.3 Overall Consultation: Approach ...... 7 2.4 Consultation - Stage 1: Two Engineering options ...... 9 2.5 Consultation - Stage 2: Pre-application consultation: Single preferred option ...... 12 2.6 Stage 2b: Information round - Helpston APSP ...... 14 2.7 Additional consultation ...... 15 3. CONSULTATION FEEDBACK ...... 16 3.1 Background ...... 16 3.2 Stage 1: Two engineering options consultation ...... 16 Community Consultation Feedback ...... 16 3.3 Stage 2: Pre-application consultation: Single preferred option ...... 18 Stakeholder Consultation feedback ...... 18 Community Consultation feedback ...... 18 3.4 Stage 2b: Information round - Helpston APSP ...... 19 4. CONCLUSION ...... 20 Appendices ...... 22 Appendix 1a: Consultation Report Schedule 5 Appendix 1b: Consultation Report Schedule 6 Appendix 1c: Best Practice and Annex 4 Appendix 2: List of Consultees – Stakeholder and Community Appendix 3: Pre-Application Approach to Community Consultation (June 2014 and August 2016) Appendix 4: 2014 Stakeholder and Community Consultation – Comments and Responses Appendix 5a: 2016 Stakeholder Consultation – Comments and Responses Appendix 5b: 2016 Community Consultation – Comments and Responses Appendix 6: Consultation Materials

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Abbreviation Definition

APSP Auxiliary Power Supply Point

CDERC Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Environmental Record Centre

CoCP Code of Construction Practice

CoPA Control of Pollution Act

DEFRA Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

DfT Department for Transport

ECML East Coast Main Line

EA Environment Agency

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

ES Environmental Statement

GNGE Great Northern Great Eastern railway

HPC Helpston Parish Council

IEP Intercity Express Programme

LDHS Long distance high speed (services)

NMU Non-motorised user

NVMP Noise and vibration monitoring plan

ORR Office of Rail Regulation

PAACC Pre-Application Approach to Community Consultation

PCC Peterborough City Council

PRoW Public Rights of Way

SSSI Site of Specific Scientific Interest

TWA Transport and Works Act

TWAO Transport and Works Act Order

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

1.1.1 Network Rail intends to submit an application for an Order (TWAO) under the Transport and Works Act (TWA) 1992 for a new grade separated junction at Werrington (“the Proposed Scheme”). Werrington Grade Separation (WGS) is part of Network Rail’s East Coast Main Line (ECML) Connectivity Programme which seeks to relieve congestion and increase capacity on the ECML.

1.1.2 The ECML is the high-speed railway link between London and Edinburgh. Network Rail, which owns and operates Britain’s rail infrastructure, has worked with industry stakeholders to develop plans to deliver projects that will improve the capacity and reduce journey times on the ECML. The provision of a new dive under at Werrington Junction to separate high speed and freight traffic is a key enabler to provide additional capacity on the ECML. This will allow the introduction of additional Long Distance High Speed (LDHS) Paths to be available for the new timetable to be introduced in 2021. The project is identified as being funded in Network Rail’s Delivery Plan1 for the ECML.

1.1.3 The Peterborough area was one of a number of locations originally identified as a constraint to growth in the Department for Transport’s High Level Output Specification, first published July 2012, and the London North Eastern Route Summary Plan 2013. A significant constraint identified in that report was the operational conflict which currently exists between freight and LDHS services to the north of Peterborough station, where freight services running between London, East Anglia and the Great Northern/Great Eastern line (GNGE) to Spalding are required to make a very slow crossing (15mph) of the ECML from the Stamford lines which run parallel to the ECML.

1.1.4 The Proposed Scheme provides a new twin track railway and ancillary works at Werrington, linking the GNGE to the lines between Peterborough and Stamford (the ‘Stamford lines’). These works would enable slow moving freight trains to travel on a dedicated route under the ECML and then onto the GNGE and vice versa, as opposed to crossing the ECML at the same level (at grade), thus allowing for an increase in capacity for additional trains on the ECML. This type of junction is known as a grade-separated junction, i.e. tracks are separated by their grade, or level. Figure 1 illustrates the Proposed Scheme in its geographical context.

1 http://www.networkrail.co.uk/Hendy-review/ 2

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Figure 1 – The Proposed Scheme plan

1.1.6 The addition of an auxiliary power supply point (APSP) and permanent compound area at the village of Helpston is required to maintain the power supply for signalling equipment and act as a back-up system in case of power supply failure.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

1.1.7 The Proposed Scheme comprises a number of other works including the following:  Cock Lane Footbridge will be demolished and replacement with a longer, steel, ramped foot/cycle bridge approximately 20-30m to the north, to include alterations to the approach public footpath/cycleway;  Brook Drain North will be relocated to the west side of the national grid pylons between Cock Lane Footbridge and the existing syphon under the ECML just north of the existing Werrington Junction;  Gasworks Lane will be widened to a 3.7m wide public highway, with passing places, between Hurn Road (just to the west of the A15) and up to the existing entrance to National Grid’s facility.;  A new multi-purpose bridge will be provided over both the existing GNGE lines and the new dive under lines, positioned just to the east side of the existing A15 highway bridge, to carry diverted utility services and a public footpath; and  A temporary bridge will be installed spanning Marholm Brook providing access into the west work site from Stirling Way.

1.2 The Consent Process and Consultation

1.2.1 Consultation on the proposals for the Proposed Scheme was ongoing between summer 2014 and December 2016. This has involved Network Rail engaging with the local community (termed ‘community consultation’ for the purpose of this Report) and statutory consultees (‘stakeholder consultation’).

1.2.2 Community consultation took place at two stages during the development and design of the Proposed Scheme and has provided the opportunity for interested parties to provide feedback whilst the proposals were evolving. The stages of consultation with the community and stakeholders are as follows:

 Stage 1 – Summer 2014 Early community consultation was carried out which involved local residents, land owners living in the vicinity of the Proposed Scheme and other interested parties from the wider area. Two engineering options for the project, a flyover and dive under, were presented at this stage.

 Stage 2 – August-December 2016 A second stage of community consultation took place to gain further feedback on the single preferred option.

1.2.3 During August to December 2016, formal stakeholder consultation was undertaken with those organisations listed within Schedule 5 and 6 of the Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 (“the Application Rules”) (see Appendices 1a and 1b), best practice and non-statutory consultees identified within Annex 4 of ‘A Guide to TWA Procedures’ (see Appendix 1c), the relevant local authority (Peterborough City Council (PCC)) and any owner, lessee, tenant or occupier

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

of land potentially impacted by the Proposed Scheme (listed in the Book of Reference which supports the Order application).

1.2.4 This Report summarises both the community and stakeholder consultation undertaken by Network Rail and has been prepared to comply with Rule 10(2)(d) of the Application Rules. The body of the Report explains who was consulted, on what issues, during the consultation.

1.2.5 The structure of the Report is as follows:-

 Section 1 provides an outline of the Proposed Scheme, and an introduction to the consultation and consent process for the Proposed Scheme.

 Section 2 contains the consultation strategy for the Proposed Scheme, including both stakeholder and community consultation.

 Section 3 summarises the feedback provided from stakeholders and the community at each stage of the consultation process.

 Section 4 concludes the Report, and provides an overall summary of the consultation carried out for the Proposed Scheme.

1.2.6 The following appendices are included in this Report:-

 Appendix 1a, 1b and 1c contains tables demonstrating that consultation has taken place with all those relevant bodies and names in column (2) of Schedule 5 and 6 to the Application Rules where authority is sought for works or other matters described in column (1) of those tables. It also contains a number of best practice and non- statutory consultees in Appendix 1c.

 Appendix 2 is a list of stakeholder consultees as described above, excluding those listed in the Book of Reference, as well as consultees within the community.

 Appendix 3 includes a copy of the Pre-Application Approach to Community Consultation (PAACC) and includes a map setting out the target area for community consultation.

 Appendices 4, 5a and 5b provide details about the responses received from consultees during consultation, Network Rail’s position on the issues raised, and how Network Rail took that feedback into account.

 Appendix 6 appends copies of relevant consultation materials.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

2. THE CONSULTATION STRATEGY

2.1 Community Consultation

2.1.1 A two-stage approach was adopted for the stakeholder and community consultation. In summer 2014 and summer 2016, Network Rail consulted on the proposals for the Proposed Scheme as described in section 2.4.

2.1.2 Ahead of this consultation a PAACC was shared with officers at PCC in June 2014. The PAACC introduced the dive under and flyover scheme proposals, outlined the strategic approach to consultation, described the tools and techniques to be used alongside a timeline, and advised how the community would be able to submit their responses to the consultation. The approach to community consultation was discussed and agreed with PCC’s planning team.

2.1.3 Prior to beginning the second round of consultation in summer 2016, Network Rail shared an updated PAACC with officers at PCC. This PAACC set out how Network Rail proposed to consult with the local community, local groups and stakeholders in advance of the application being submitted. It also provided details and the background of the scheme, the consent process, the strategy for consultation with the community including consultation activities, how to feed back with responses to the consultation and how the results of the consultation would be disseminated.

2.1.4 The PAACC was updated and discussed and agreed with PCC in August 2016 and a copy of the document was made publically available online at https://consultations.networkrail.co.uk/communications/werrington-grade- separation/.

2.1.5 The 2014 and 2016 PAACCs are both included in Appendix 3 of this Report.

2.2 Stakeholder Consultation

2.2.1 Stakeholders consisting of landowners, the local authority, as well as those with an interest in land that may be potentially affected by the Proposed Scheme formed the second category of consultees (Appendices 1a, 1b and 1c). This category includes all those names of Schedules 5 and 6 and best practice stakeholders to the Application Rules who are entitled, in this instance, to receive a copy of the application documents or notice that the application has been made.

2.2.2 A two-staged approach has been adopted to stakeholder consultation, including early consultation on two options with local people and stakeholders between summer 2014 and October 2015 and a second stage of stakeholder consultation on the preferred option carried out in August-December 2016, in advance of the second round of public exhibition and of the TWAO application being submitted in December 2016.

2.2.3 In addition, phased consultation continued to be carried out with relevant statutory bodies including PCC, Environment Agency, Natural England, local 6

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

utility suppliers including drainage boards, gas, water and electricity suppliers, amongst other key stakeholders and engagement with these stakeholders is ongoing.

2.3 Overall Consultation: Approach

2.3.1 Network Rail is committed to early and thorough consultation with stakeholder and community consultees. Before drawing up detailed plans for the Proposed Scheme, Network Rail wanted to provide consultees with an opportunity to provide feedback on the proposals. This enables any key areas of concern about the plans to be identified at an early stage. Where feasible, Network Rail uses the feedback to influence the design as it develops.

2.3.2 The first stage of consultation began in June 2014 and the second in August 2016. Below is a summary of the key features of the stages of consultation carried out to support the application.

Stage of Date Consultation activity consultation Stage 1 June 2014 Stage 1 consultation: Two engineering options Summer 2014 Analysis of consultation feedback from stage 1 (two engineering options) October 2015 Public drop-in sessions to announce the preferred option (the dive under) Stage 2 August-December 2016 Stage 2 consultation – Pre-application consultation: Single preferred option September-October Analysis of consultation 2016 feedback from Phase 2 (single preferred option) October 2016 Additional information round: Helpston APSP. Included key landowner/tenant meetings and discussions.

2.3.3 Once formal consultation was underway, it was iterative. Network Rail’s intention was to work with all parties during the development of the Proposed Scheme and to reach agreement, where possible, on any issues prior to submitting the TWAO application.

2.3.4 To make sure that as many people as possible engaged in the consultation, Network Rail put in place a series of feedback mechanisms including freepost 7

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

feedback forms, an online feedback form on Network Rail’s website, a dedicated project email address and Network Rail’s 24-hour helpline. Any responses received after the deadlines were also taken into consideration where possible including emails received into the dedicated project inbox.

2.3.5 The responses to stakeholder and community consultation have been considered and, where possible, have helped to shape the detail of the Proposed Scheme. Network Rail has provided feedback on consultation responses by appropriate means including the provision of further information to stakeholders and the community in general, at meetings with individual stakeholders including Parish Councils, and at meetings of various working groups and correspondence. Engagement with these stakeholders will continue post-application.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

2.4 Consultation - Stage 1: Two Engineering options

2.4.1 Two engineering options for the Proposed Scheme were presented at the first round of consultation in summer 2014.

2.4.2 The flyover option passes over the existing ECML and a dive under option which passes under the existing ECML. Both of these proposed options are shown in Figure 2 below.

Figure 2: Plan showing the dive under and flyover proposed route options

Stakeholder Consultation

2.4.3 Stage 1 of consultation for the two engineering options took place in summer 2014. Stakeholders were consulted on an informal basis and introduced to Network Rail’s initial proposals. The stakeholders engaged with included PCC, the Environment Agency and UK Power Networks.

Community consultation

2.4.4 Community consultation on the two engineering options (dive under/flyover) was carried out in summer 2014 with a 46 day feedback period which took place from 16 June to 31 August 2014. Consultation material for the Proposed

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Scheme was available at a series of community consultation drop-in events, including the exhibition display panels and information leaflets. This material was also available to view on the Network Rail website. Copies of the materials are available in Appendix 6.

2.4.5 The community consultation drop-in events took place as follows:

 Loxley Community Centre on Wednesday 18 June 2014 (4-7pm) and Thursday 19 June 2014 (1-4pm)  Hodgson Community Centre, Werrington on Friday 20 June 2014 (4- 8pm) and Saturday 21 June 2014 (3-6pm)

2.4.6 The materials displayed at these events included:

 Exhibition boards containing the Proposed Scheme details and plans of the two proposed engineering options; and  Leaflets containing information of the Proposed Scheme, environmental information and plans of the proposed work.

2.4.7 A copy of the consultation leaflet produced for the consultation can be found at Appendix 6.

2.4.8 To help promote the community consultation, a thorough programme of publicity was put in place starting on in June 2014 which comprised of:

 A flyer with details of all consultation events which was distributed in the local area which was agreed with PCC;  The target areas for a mail out were included in the PAACC document (June 2014);  Adverts placed in the Peterborough Telegraph and Peterborough Citizen newspapers in June 2014; and  Online information was made available on Network Rail’s website www.networkrail.co.uk/werrington.

2.4.9 Copies of all of the material referred to above can be found at Appendix 6.

2.4.10 Mechanisms were put in place to help capture feedback from the local community during the period of consultation. These mechanisms included the following:

 Freepost feedback form attached to the information leaflet;  Online feedback form at www.networkrail.co.uk/werrington  Email address [email protected]  Written comments could be submitted to the Contact & Communities address at Network Rail’s office at 4B Stephenson House, Toft Green, York YO1 6JT; and  Calls to the Network Rail’s 24-hour National helpline.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Community Consultation – Update on preferred option

2.4.11 Following consultation on the two options in summer 2014, a single preferred option was selected and communicated to the community.

2.4.12 Network Rail held project information update events, following the announcement of the preferred option (dive under) for the Proposed Scheme at The Hodgson Community Centre in Werrington on Friday 2 October 2015 (3-7pm) and Saturday 3 October 2015 (2:30-6pm). The purpose of these events was to give the local community the opportunity to discuss the preferred option and to ask questions about it.

2.4.13 A letter with details of the events and describing the preferred option was sent to residents in the local area, in addition to the information being advertised on the Network Rail website.

2.4.14 Approximately 80 members of the public attended the events. The main themes that emerged from the events included concerns about operational noise, vibration and lighting and potential devaluation of properties. However the dive under option was positively received by the community.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

2.5 Consultation - Stage 2: Pre-application consultation: Single preferred option

2.5.1 The dive under option was chosen following the first round of consultation in summer 2014 and this was announced in October 2015.

2.5.2 This option was selected based on: public and technical consultation feedback; technical requirements of the project; environmental (including visual) impact; cost; maintenance’ constructability; hydrology; and utilities in the area.

2.5.3 The single preferred dive under option is shown in figure 3, below.

Figure 3 – Plan to show the preferred dive under option route

Stakeholder Consultation

2.5.4 During Stage 2 engagement with stakeholders continued as required for the environmental and engineering design to progress. A statutory stakeholder briefing pack was issued to all relevant stakeholders, in accordance with the TWAO Rules, on 31 August 2016. This contained information about the Proposed Scheme and the Environmental Scoping report.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

2.5.5 The Environmental Scoping report provides stakeholders with an overview of the Proposed Scheme, set out the environmental conditions, a brief summary of likely effects and the evaluation and assessment methodologies that will be followed. This was sent to key stakeholders, including the Department for Transport (DfT), the Environment Agency, Historic England, PCC and Welland & Deepings Internal Drainage board on 4 July 2016, ahead of the consultation pack being issued. The responses from each stakeholder are detailed in chapter 5 of the Werrington Grade Separation Environmental Statement (ES)2.

2.5.6 Stakeholders were given 28 days to respond to the statutory briefing pack. Responses received are summarised and presented in Appendix 4.

2.5.7 Network Rail met with three land and property owners affected by the Proposed Scheme, Parish Councils and the local authorities ahead of and during the consultation period. Negotiations with affected land and property owners are ongoing and Network Rail will always seek to reach agreement through negotiation before using compulsory purchase order powers.

Community consultation

2.5.8 Community consultation for the preferred option was carried out between 7 September and 12 October 2016. A meeting was held on Friday 2 September 2016 at Werrington Village Centre for the key affected land and property owners including residents of Hurn and Lincoln Road. These residents were identified as those that would be potentially most affected by the scheme and construction. Consultation material for the Proposed Scheme was available at this residents meeting including the exhibition display panels, a large scheme plan and information leaflets.

2.5.9 The community consultation events are listed below:

 Werrington Village Centre on Wednesday 7 September (3pm-7pm) and Friday 16 September 2016 (2pm-5pm)  William Law School in Werrington on Saturday 10 September (10:30am-2:30pm); and  Barn Youth Centre in Werrington, on Thursday 15 September 2016 (2:30pm-6:30pm).

2.5.10 Consultees were initially given a 34 day deadline to respond to consultation material which was then extended to 43 days. There were technical difficulties in uploading the consultation material and the extension of the response period ensured Consultees access to all the consultation material online for a full 28 days.

2 Werrington Grade Separation Environmental Statement, Arup, November 2012 13

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

2.5.11 The materials displayed at these events included:

 Exhibition boards containing the Proposed Scheme details;  Leaflets containing information of the Proposed Scheme and environmental information;  Large scale plans of the Proposed Scheme; and  Technical design drawings which were used to explain different facets of the proposed design.

2.5.12 A copy of the consultation materials used during the Stage 2 pre-application community consultation can be found at Appendix 6.

2.5.13 To help promote the community consultation a thorough programme of publicity was put in place, starting in August 2016, which comprised of:

 A letter sent to all residents detailing the dates and locations of the consultation events;  The target areas for the mail out were included in the PAACC (August 2016) and agreed with the local authority, PCC;  An advert placed in the Peterborough Telegraph newspaper on 26 August 2016;  Posters displayed in community locations around Werrington including village halls, community centres and parish churches.  A press release sent out in early September 2016; and  Online information was made available on Network Rail’s website www.networkrail.co.uk/werrington.

2.5.14 Copies of all of the promotional material referred to above can be found at Appendix 6.

2.5.15 The following feedback/response channels were put in place and maintained during the consultation:

 Freepost feedback form attached to the information leaflet;  A post-box at the consultation events to submit paper copies of the feedback form into;  Online feedback form on Network Rail’s Citizen Space website https://consultations.networkrail.co.uk/communications/werrington- grade-separation/  Email addresses [email protected] (for the community) and [email protected] (for stakeholders); and  Calls to Network Rail’s 24-hour National helpline.

2.6 Stage 2b: Information round - Helpston APSP

2.6.1 As part of the Proposed Scheme it was identified by the design team that a back-up APSP would be required, to be located in Helpston. This was identified after the Werrington Grade Separation pre-application consultation.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

2.6.2 An information letter was sent to 94 residential addresses in October 2016 in the Helpston area, surrounding the proposed area for the APSP, and both PCC and HPC. This invited the community to respond back to Network Rail within two weeks.

2.6.3 The letter sent out included detail about the proposed APSP and construction, a map of the proposed APSP location, and the Werrington Grade Separation leaflet. This material is included in Appendix 6.

2.6.4 The following feedback/response channels were put in place for the two-week period:

 Email address [email protected];  The Contact & Communities postal address; and  Calls to Network Rail’s 24-hour National helpline.

2.7 Additional consultation

2.7.1 After October 2016 additional stakeholders were consulted and sent a statutory consultation briefing pack. These stakeholders included: the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA); additional landowners in Fox Covert including Peakirk Church Estate; additional property owners, tenants and lessees identified in the Book of Reference in Bretton; and mortgagees for land affected by the Proposed Scheme.

2.7.2 These stakeholders were formally consulted in November 2016 and were contacted after the main part of the Stage 2 stakeholder consultation (which was undertaken in September-October 2016) for the following reasons:  A review of statutory consultees identified that DEFRA was not consulted in September-October 2016, therefore this was corrected;  Ecological mitigation was proposed to be put in place on land at Fox Covert in Werrington, identifying additional land that would be affected by the Proposed Scheme;  Further land parcels were identified in Bretton which would be affected by the Proposed Scheme;  Mortgagees of existing land affected by the Proposed Scheme were identified.

2.7.3 DEFRA were given a 28 day deadline to respond to consultation material as a statutory consultee. Landowners, property owners, tenants, lessees and mortgagees were given a 14 day deadline to respond to consultation material due to the proximity to the Application deadline.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

3. CONSULTATION FEEDBACK

3.1 Background

3.1.1 This section of the Report outlines the high level themes that emerged as a result of stakeholder and community consultation. A detailed breakdown of the comments received and Network Rail’s response to the issues are given at Appendices 4, 5a and 5b.

3.2 Stage 1: Two engineering options consultation

Community Consultation Feedback

3.2.1 A total of 142 responses were received during the consultation, both by email and hard copy feedback forms.

3.2.2 Consultees that completed the feedback form were asked if they support the improvement of passenger services on the ECML. Of the 142 people who responded, 47% strongly agreed, 30% agreed, 11% were undecided, 4% disagreed, 7% strongly disagreed and 1% did not answer.

3.2.3 Consultees were also asked which of Network Rail’s proposed options they preferred. Of the 142 people who responded, 69% preferred the dive under, 18% preferred the flyover and 13% were undecided.

3.2.4 The key themes that emerged as part of the consultation feedback, in order of frequency of mentions from most to least, were as follows:

 Operational and/or construction noise and vibration;  Visual impact;  Property value, including close proximity of respondents house/residents;  More information required (including visualisations;  Environmental concerns (including wider land usage);  Impact on local road network and traffic;  Construction impacts including behaviour of construction workers;  Concerns around increased train services;  Proposed alternative solutions to flyover and dive under;  Request for a new station and wider benefits to Werrington;  Support for the scheme;  Request to keep residents informed, thorough additional consultation;  Scheme to accommodate pedestrians, footpaths, cyclists;  Speed up delivery of the scheme;  Impacts on archaeology and heritage;  Electrification of GNGE;  Raising awareness of gas main;  Improve level crossings; and

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

 General comment, trains are too expensive.

3.2.5 All feedback was reviewed and considered by the Network Rail project team and where feasible, influenced the design going forward. These themes and the subsequent actions by Network Rail were presented on a ‘you said/we did’ exhibition panel at the drop-in update events held in October 2015.

3.2.6 A summary of this feedback is included in Appendix 5.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

3.3 Stage 2: Pre-application consultation: Single preferred option

Stakeholder Consultation feedback

3.3.1 As part of Stage 2 consultation a total of 18 organisations responded. Of these, two organisations specified that they had no objection to the Proposed Scheme.

3.3.2 From the responses received, the following themes emerged as key considerations:

 Distribution of consultation material  Alterations to power networks  Impacts on biodiversity  Potential for additional consultation event locations  Keeping stakeholders informed  Construction and/or operational noise and vibration  Effects on pedestrians and cyclists  Flood risk  Compulsory purchase  Contaminated land  Disruption to rail services  Alternative location for the scheme

3.3.3 All feedback was reviewed and considered by the project team and where feasible, influenced the design going forward. All feedback received and how Network Rail took account of that feedback is contained in Appendix 5.

Community Consultation feedback

3.3.4 Approximately 225 members of the public attended the four community consultation events held in September 2016.

3.3.5 A total of 52 responses were received during the community consultation, both by email and hard copy feedback forms. Consultees who completed the feedback form were asked if they support Network Rail’s plans to implement the Proposed Scheme. Of the 52 people who responded, 35% strongly agreed, 33 % agreed, 13% were undecided, 2% disagreed, 11% strongly disagreed and 6% did not answer.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

3.3.6 The key themes that emerged as part of the community consultation feedback, in order of frequency of mentions from most to least, were as follows:

 Construction, existing and/or operational noise and vibration  Access including pedestrian, bridleway, cycling, construction traffic, public transport, and the potential for a new station  Scheme delivery to programme  Keeping residents informed with further information  Impacts on the environment  Property value and compensation  Public highway safety concerns  Comments on the consultation process  Other.

3.3.7 All feedback was reviewed and considered by the Network Rail project team and where feasible, influenced the design going forward. How Network Rail took account of the feedback is contained in Appendix 5.

3.4 Stage 2b: Information round - Helpston APSP

No feedback was received as a result of the Helpston APSP information update that took place in October 2016.

3.5 Additional Consultation

Feedback on later identified consultees has centred around confirmation of ownership for the Book of Reference. Network Rail is continuing to work with Peakirk Church Estate on the matter of identified ecological mitigation at the Fox Covert site.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

4. CONCLUSION

4.1.1 In summer 2014 and August to December 2016, Network Rail undertook a robust programme of stakeholder and community consultation about its proposals for the Proposed Scheme.

4.1.2 Consultees included the public, those organisations listed within Schedule 5 and 6 of the Application Rules (see Appendices 1a and 1b), best practice and non-statutory Consultees listed within Annex 4 of ‘A Guide to TWA Procedures’ (see Appendix 1c), the relevant local authority and any owner, lessee, tenant or occupier of land potentially impacted by the Proposed Scheme (listed in the Book of Reference which supports the Order application).

4.1.3 Prior to beginning consultation activity, Network Rail agreed a PAACC (at Appendix 3) with officers at PCC.

4.1.4 The consultation phases provided an opportunity to share the emerging plans with consultees and invited feedback as the proposal evolved.

4.1.5 Consultation has been important in helping identify potential issues at an early stage of the Proposed Scheme’s development. It has enabled Network Rail to collate as much feedback as possible as the design of the Proposed Scheme has progressed. The comments submitted have been considered and, where possible, taken into account.

4.1.6 Network Rail recognises that a scheme of this nature will inevitably have an impact on the area surrounding the Proposed Scheme. As such it will continue to liaise with both stakeholders and the community as the Proposed Scheme develops.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

[page intentionally blank]

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

APPENDICES

Appendix 1a: Consultation Report Schedule 5 Appendix 1b: Consultation Report Schedule 6 Appendix 1c: Best Practice and Annex 4 Appendix 2: List of Consultees – Stakeholder and Community Appendix 3: Pre-application Approach to Community Consultation (June 2014 and August 2016) Appendix 4: 2014 Stakedholer and Community Consultation – Comments and Responses Appendix 5a: 2016 Stakeholder Consultation – Comments and Responses Appendix 5b: 2016 Community Consultation – Comments and Responses Appendix 6: Consultation Materials

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken APPENDIX 1a – CONSULTATION REPORT SCHEDULE 5

THE NETWORK RAIL (WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION) ORDER – TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 SCHEDULE 5 – THOSE TO BE SERVED WITH A COPY OF THE APPLICATION AND DOCUMENTS

Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation 1. Works affecting the foreshore The Crown Estate Not applicable Not applicable below mean high water spring Commissioners; the Trinity House; tides, or tidal waters, or the bed of, the Environment Agency; the or the subsoil beneath, tidal waters. Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; the Secretary of State for Transport (marked “for the attention of Maritime and Coastguard Agency”); and, for works – (a) In or adjacent to Wales, the National Assembly for Wales; (b) In or adjacent to the counties of Devon and Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly, the Duchy of Cornwall; and (c) In or adjacent to the counties of Cumbria, Lancashire, Merseyside and Cheshire; the Duchy of Lancaster. 2. Works affecting the banks of, or the The Environment Agency and any Consult with: As part of Stage 2 subsoil beneath, a river. relevant operator. consultation, the The Environment Agency Environment Agency and and Welland and Welland and Deepings Deepings IDB. IDB were formally consulted in August

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation 2016. Prior to this date both parties were included within a working group which have met regularly since Spring 2016. 3. Works affecting the banks of, or the The British Waterways Board; the Not applicable Not applicable bed of, or subsoil beneath, an Inland Waterways Amenity inland waterway comprised in the Advisory Council; the Inland undertaking of the British Waterways Association; the Waterways Board or any of the National Association of Boat reservoirs, feeders, sluices, locks, Owners; and the Environment lifts, drains and other works Agency. comprised in or serving the undertaking. 4. Works affecting the banks or the Any relevant operator; the Not applicable Not applicable bed of, or subsoil beneath, a canal Environment Agency; the Inland or inland navigation not comprised Waterways Association; and the in the undertaking of the British National Association of Boat Waterways Board or any of the Owners. reservoirs, feeders, sluices, locks, lifts, drains and other works comprised in or serving such canal or inland navigation. 5. Works causing or likely to cause an The Environment Agency, and for Consult with: Please refer to category obstruction to the passage of fish in works – The Environment Agency 2 above for information a river. (a) In England, the Secretary and on the Environment of State for Environment, Secretary of State for Agency. The Secretary of Food and Rural Affairs; Environment, Food and State for Environment, and Rural Affairs. Food and Rural Affairs (b) In Wales, the National was formally consulted in Assembly for Wales. November 2016 as part of Stage 2 consultation. 6. Works involving tunnelling or The Environment Agency. Consult with: The Please refer to category

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation excavation deeper than 3 metres Environment Agency 2 above for information below the surface of the land, other on the Environment than for piling or making soil tests. Agency. 7. Works affecting an area under the The relevant harbour authority and Not applicable Not applicable control of a harbour authority as the relevant navigation authority (if defined in in section 57 (1) of the different). Harbours Act 1964(a). 8. Works affecting a site protected For works – Not applicable Not applicable under the Protection of Wrecks Act (a) In or adjacent to England, 1973 (b). the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport; and (b) In or adjacent to Wales, the National Assembly for Wales. 9. Works affecting, or involving the The relevant highway authority, or Consult with: PCC and PCC were formally stopping-up or diversion of, a where the street is not a highway street managers. consulted as part of street, or affecting a proposed maintainable at public expense, Stage 1 (informal) & 2 highway. the street managers. Street managers include: (formal) consultations. PCC, Environment Agency, The Concrete Street managers were Company (Thorney) formally consulted with in Limited, and local street August/September 2016 managers. as part of Stage 2 consultation. 10 The stopping-up or diversion of a Every parish or community council Consult with the Auto- All Consultees were footpath, a bridleway, a byway or a in whose area the relevant way or Cycle Union, the British formally consulted in cycle track. track is, or is proposed to be, Horse Society, the August 2016 as part of situated, the Auto-Cycle Union, Byways and Bridleway Stage 2 consultation. the British Horse Society, the Trust, the Open Spaces Byways and Bridleway Trust, the Society, the Ramblers Open Spaces Society, the Association, the British Ramblers Association, the British Driving Society and the Driving Society and the Cyclists Cyclists Touring Club.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation Touring Club; and for works – Consult with: Bretton (a) In the counties of Parish Council and Cheshire, Derbyshire, Werrington Greater Manchester, Neighbourhood Council. Lancashire, Merseyside, South Yorkshire, Staffordshire and West Yorkshire, the Peak and Northern Footpaths Society, and (b) In the county of Bedfordshire, the borough of Luton and within the district of South Bedfordshire the parishes of Barton le Clay, Caddington and Slip End, Dunstable, Eaton Bray, Houghton Regis, Hyde, Kensworth, Streatly, Studham, Sundon, Toddington, Totternhoe and Whipsnade, the Chiltern Society; and (c) In the county of Buckinghamshire, in the districts of Chiltern, Wycombe and South Bucks, and within the district of Aylesbury Vale the parishes of Aston Clinton, Buckland, Drayton Beauchamp, Edlesborough, Northall and

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation Dagnall, Halton, Ivinghoe, Marsworth, Pitstone, Wendover and Weston Turville, the Chiltern Society; and (d) In the county of Hertforshire, in the districts of Dacorum and Three Rivers, and within the district of North Hertfordshire the parishes of Hexton, Hitchin, Ickleford, Ippollitts, King’s Walden, Langley, Lilley, Offley, Pirton, Preston and St Apul’s Warden, the Chiltern Society; and (e) In the county of Oxfordshire, the district of South Oxfordshire, the Chiltern Society; and (f) In Wales, the Welsh Trail Riders’ Association. 11. The construction of a transport The relevant street authority and, Consult with: Please refer to category system involving the placing of where the works are to be carried PCC 9 above for information equipment in or over a street. out in Greater London, Transport on PCC. for London. 12. Works affecting land in, on or over The relevant statutory undertaker. Consult with British All Consultees were which is installed the apparatus, Telecommunications PLC, formally consulted in equipment or street furniture of a Anglian Water, UK Power August-September 2016 statutory undertaker. Networks, National Grid, as part of Stage 2 Vodafone, consultation. Level 3 Communications

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation and Royal Mail. 13. Works in area of coal working The Coal Authority. Not applicable Not applicable notified to the local planning authority by the British Coal Corporation or the Coal Authority. 14. Work affecting: For works – Not applicable Not applicable (i) A building listed (a) In or adjacent to England, under Part 1 of the the Historic Buildings and Planning (Listed Monuments Commission Buildings and for England; and Conservation Areas) (b) In or adjacent to Wales, Act 1990 (a); the National Assembly for (ii) An ancient Wales and the Royal monument Commission on Ancient scheduled under and Historical Monuments Ancient Monuments in Wales. and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 (b); or (iii) Any archaeological site. 15. Works affecting: For works – Not applicable Not applicable (i) A conservation area (a) In England, the Historic designated under Buildings and Monuments Part 2 of the Commission for England; Planning (Listed and Buildings and (b) In Wales, the National Conservation Areas) Assembly for Wales. Act 1990; or (ii) An area of archaeological importance designated under section 33 of the

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979. 16. Works affecting a garden or other For works – Not applicable Not applicable land of historic interest registered (a) In England, the Historic pursuant to section 8C of the Buildings and Monuments Historic Buildings and Ancient Commission for England; Monuments Act 1953(a). and (b) In Wales, the National Assembly for Wales.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation 17. Works affecting: For works – Consult with: Natural England was (i) A site of special (a) In or adjacent to England, Natural England formally consulted in scientific interest of English Nature; and August 2016 as part of which notification (b) In or adjacent to Wales, Stage 2 consultation. has been given or the Countryside Council for has effect as if given Wales. under section 28(1) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981(b). (ii) An area within 2 kilometres of such a site of special scientific interest and of which notification has been given to the local planning authority; or (iii) Land declared to be a national nature reserve under section 35 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981; or a marine nature reserve designated under section 36 of that Act. (iv)

Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken consultation 18. Works affecting a National Park or For works – Not applicable Not applicable an Area of Outstanding Natural (a) In England, the Beauty. Countryside Agency; and (b) In Wales, the Countryside Council for Wales. 19. Works which are either: The Secretary of State for Culture, Not applicable Not applicable (i) Within 3km of Media and Sport. Windsor Castle, Windsor Great Park or Windsor Home Park; or (ii) Within 800m of any other royal palace or royal park and which are likely to affect the amenity or security of that palace or park. 20. Works which are within 250m of The Environment Agency. Consult with: Please refer to category land which: The Environment Agency 2 above for information (i) Is, or has been on the Environment within 30 years Agency. immediately prior to the date of the application, used for the deposit of refuse or waste; or (ii) Has been notified to the local planning authority by the waste regulation or disposal authority for the relevant area.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation 21. The carrying-out of an operation The hazardous substances Not applicable Not applicable requiring hazardous substances authority as defined in that Act and consent under the Planning the Health and Safety Executive. (Hazardous Substances) Act 1990(c). 22. Works not in accordance with a (i) and (ii). For works – Not applicable Not applicable development plan and which either (a) in England, the (i) Involve the loss of Secretary of State for not less than 20 Environment, Food and hectares or Rural Affairs. agricultural land of (b) in Wales, the grades 1, 2 and 3a National Assembly for (in aggregate; or Wales. (ii) Taken with the other associated works cumulatively involve the loss of not less than 20 hectares of such land. 23. (i) Works which would affect the Transport Focus (a) or the London Consult with: Transport Focus were operation of any existing railway Transport Users’ Committee (b) as Transport Focus. formally consulted in passenger or tramway services the case may require. August 2016 as part of provided under statutory powers; or Stage 2 consultation. (i) the construction of a new railway for the provision of public passenger transport, or of a new tramway.

24. Works to construct, alter or Her Majesty’s Railway Consult with: The ORR was formally demolish a transport system or to Inspectorate (now the Office of ORR consulted in August 2016 carry out works ancillary to its Rail Regulation (ORR)). as part of Stage 2 operation or works consequential consultation. upon its abandonment or demolition.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation 25. Works to construct new railways to The Office of Rail Regulation. Consult with: Please refer to category which any regulatory provisions in ORR 24 above for information the Railways Act 1993 (c) would on the ORR. apply or provisions to amend existing powers in relation to railways subject to such regulation. 26. The right for a person providing The operator of the relevant Not applicable Not applicable transport services to use a transport system. transport system belonging to another. 27. Works affecting land in which there The appropriate authority for the Consult with: Not applicable is a Crown interest. land, within the meaning of section Not applicable 25(3). 28. Works to be carried out in Greater The Mayor of London. Not applicable Not applicable London.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken APPENDIX 1b – CONSULTATION REPORT SCHEDULE 6

THE NETWORK RAIL (WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION) ORDER – TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 SCHEDULE 6 – THOSE TO BE SERVED WITH NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION

Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation 1. Works affecting the foreshore For works – Not applicable Not applicable below mean high water spring (a) In or adjacent to England, tides, or tidal waters, or the bed English Nature; and of, or the subsoil beneath, tidal (b) In or adjacent to Wales, the waters (except where the land Countryside Council for affected by the works falls within Wales. category 17 of Schedule 5 to these Rules). 2. Works affecting the banks of, or The Crown Estate Commissioners; Consult with: Natural England was the subsoil beneath, a river. and (except where the land affected Natural England formally consulted in falls within category 17 of Schedule 5 August 2016 as part of to these Rules) for works – Stage 2 consultation. (a) In England, English Nature; and (b) In Wales, the Countryside Council for Wales. 3. Works affecting the banks or the Any organisation (other than the Not included Not included bed of, or the subsoil beneath, Inland Waterways Association and an inland waterway, a canal or the National Association of Boat inland navigation, or any of the Owners) upon which the Secretary of reservoirs, feeders, sluicers, State has required the applicant to locks, lifts, drains and other serve notice, as appearing to the works comprised in or serving Secretary of State to represent a that inland waterway, canal or substantial number of persons using inland navigation. the inland waterway, canal or inland navigation in question; and (except where the land affected falls within category 17 of Schedule 5 to these Rules) for works –

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation (a) In England, English Nature; and (b) In Wales, the Countryside Council for Wales. 4. Works affecting an area under The navigation authority for any Not applicable Not applicable the control of a harbour authority adjoining waterway (if different from as defined in in section 57 (1) of the navigation authority for the the Harbours Act 1964(a). harbour area) and the conservancy authority for any adjoining waterway. 5. Works which would, or would The Environment Agency. Consult with: The Environment Agency apart from the making of an The Environment Agency was formally consulted in order, require a consent to the August 2016 as part of discharge of matter into waters Stage 2 consultation. or onto land under Chapter 2 of Part 3 of the Water Resources Act 1991(b). 6. Works likely to affect the volume (i) For works – Consult with: The The Secretary of State or character of traffic entering or (a) in England, the Secretary of State and for Transport and PCC leaving – Secretary of State for PCC. were formally consulted (i) A special road or Transport (marked “for at Stage 2 consultation. trunk road; attention of the (ii) Any other Highways Agency”); classified road. and (b) In Wales, the National Assembly for Wales. (ii) The relevant highway authority. 7. The construction of a transport Owners and occupiers of all buildings Not applicable Not applicable system involving the placing of of all buildings which have a frontage equipment in or over a street on, or a private means of access (except a level crossing). which first meets the highway at, the part of the street in or over which equipment is to be placed, other than those on whom a notice has been

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation served pursuant to rule 15(1). 8. Works affecting any land on The Theatres Trust. Not applicable Not applicable which there is a theatre as defined in Section 5 of the Theatres Trust Act 1975 (b). 9. The modification, exclusion, The person upon whom such Not applicable Not applicable amendment repeal or revocation protection or benefit is conferred, or of a provision of an Act of the person currently entitled to that Parliament or statutory protection or benefit. instrument conferring protection or benefit upon any person (whether in his capacity as the owner of designated land or otherwise) specifically named therein. 10 The compulsory purchase of The Church Commissioners. The Church Church Commissioners ecclesiastical property (as Commissioners. have been consulted as defined in section 12(3) of the a precautionary measure Acquisition of Land Act as negotiations with 1981(a)). landowner at Peakirk GCN site are clarifying whether Commissioners are required to be notified. 11. Works in Greater London or a The relevant Fire and Rescue Not applicable Not applicable metropolitan county. Authority within the meaning of Part 1 of the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004(b) and the relevant Police Authority within the meaning of Part 1 of the Police Act 1996(c). 12. The right to monitor, survey or Every owner and occupier of the Every owner or occupier Not applicable. investigate land (including any land, other than the owner or is named in the Book of right to make trial holes in land). occupier named in the book of Reference. reference as having an interest or

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Authority sought for: Documents to be served on: Proposed recipients: Project development and design consultation right in or over that land. 13. Works or traffic management Every universal service provider Consult with: Royal Mail was formally measures that would affect affected. Royal Mail consulted in August services provided by a universal 2016. service provider in connection with the provision of a universal postal service and relating to the delivery or collection of letters. 14. Works in an area of coal The holder of the current licence Not applicable Not applicable working notified to the local under section 36(ii) of the Coal planning authority by the British Industry Nationalisation Act 1946 Coal Corporation or the Coal (savings as to certain coal) or under Authority. Part 2 of the Coal Industry Act 1994 (licensing of coal mining operations). 15. Works for which an For works – The requirement to serve Not applicable environmental impact (a) In England, the Commission under Schedule 6(15) assessment is required. for Architecture and the Built was revoked by SI Environment; and 2012/147 when CABE (b) In Wales, the Design was absorbed into the Commissioner for Wales. Design Council. 16. The compulsory acquisition of Any person, other than a person who Not applicable Not applicable land, or the right to use land, or is named in the book of reference the carrying out of protective described in rule 12(8), whom the works to buildings. applicant thinks is likely to be entitled to make a claim for compensation under section 10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965(f) if the order is made and the powers in question are exercised, so far as he is known to the applicant after making diligent inquiry.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken APPENDIX 1c – BEST PRACTICE AND ANNEX 4

THE NETWORK RAIL (WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION) ORDER – TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 BEST PRACTICE AND ANNEX 4 – A GUIDE TO TWA PROCEDURES

BEST PRACTICE

Part 2: Pre-application Stage – Stakeholder identification: Proposed recipients: Project development and Who else should be consulted? design consultation (A Guide to TWA Procedures): 1. Paragraph 2.6: Where an  Local planning Consult with: PCC, Natural England, application would involve new authority PCC, Natural England, Heritage England, works, it will usually be desirable to  Relevant Heritage England, Environment Agency, Open consult the local planning authority. environmental or Environment Agency and Spaces Society were heritage statutory Open Spaces Society. consulted in August 2016. Paragraph 2.17: The local planning agencies authority should be able to offer Cambridgeshire County advice in selecting suitable route Council, as the neighbouring alignments or locations for authority, was also formally proposed schemes…If, after consulted in August 2016. considering the options, a prospective applicant can see no reasonable alternative to encroaching on an environmentally sensitive site, the local planning authority and the relevant environmental or heritage statutory agencies should be consulted at an early stage. 2. Paragraph 2.6: A prospective  Relevant parish Consult with: Werrington Neighbourhood applicant should also consult the council Werrington Council and Bretton Parish relevant parish council (in England) Neighbourhood Council Council were consulted in in regard to any matters of local and Bretton Parish August 2016. interest. Council. Marholm Parish Council and Glinton Parish Council were also formally consulted in

Network Rail attended Parish Council meetings for the above in September to October 2016. 3. Paragraph 2.10: The local  Local community Consult with: Werrington Community authorities may be able to provide organisations and Werrington Community Youth Group, Werrington helpful advice, in particular interest groups Youth Group, Werrington Community Volunteer regarding relevant local community Community Volunteer Group, Womens Institute, organisations and interest Group, Womens Institute, Glinton and Peakirk Energy groups…Applicants should be alive Glinton and Peakirk Community Interest to the formation of new interest Energy Community Company, Peterborough groups and should seek to maintain Interest Company, Environment City Trust, regular contact with them. It is Peterborough Peterborough Enterprise important also that local Environment City Trust, Partnership, Dukesmead communities are kept informed. Peterborough Enterprise Resident’s Association, Partnership, Dukesmead SUSTRANS, Cambridge Resident’s Association, and Peterborough NHS SUSTRANS, Cambridge Foundation Trust, and Peterborough NHS Peterborough-Ely-Norwich Foundation Trust, Rail Users, Peterborough Peterborough-Ely-Norwich Fire and Rescue Service Rail Users, Peterborough and Peterborough Police Fire and Rescue Service Constabulary were formally and Peterborough Police consulted in August- Constabulary. September 2016. 4. Paragraph 2.11: Prospective  Relevant national or Network Rail are not Network Rail is not aware of applicants should also consider regional organisations aware of any land or any land or facilities which national or regional facilities associated with associated with any regional organisations are likely to have a any regional or national or national organisations relevant interest and should organisations that will be that will be affected by the therefore desirably be consulted at affected by the scheme. scheme. the pre-application stage.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Part 2: Pre-application Stage – Stakeholder identification: Proposed recipients: Project development and Who else should be consulted? design consultation (A Guide to TWA Procedures): 5. Paragraph 2.12: Where it is  Relevant Government Consult with: Consulted with by scheme intended to finance a scheme Office and/or the Department for Transport sponsor throughout the wholly or partly from public funds, relevant policy division establishment of this project the relevant Government Office since 2012, and regularly and/or the relevant policy division in (i.e. Department for Transport) monthly updates are the Department concerned should provided in addition to be consulted at a very early stage. quarterly Programme Board meetings. 6. Paragraph 2.13: Where the project  Owners, lessees, Consult with: All known owners, lessees, would involve the compulsory tenants and occupiers All those known at the tenants and occupiers were acquisition of land or rights in land, time of consultation. consulted in September the prospective applicant should 2016. normally consult the owners, lessees, tenants and occupiers of such land at an early stage.

Paragraph 2.14: It would also be prudent to consult the owners and occupiers of land which would be affected by the proposed works but which is not itself subject to compulsory purchase.

Paragraph 2.14: Prospective applicants should also consider whether there are persons or bodies using the land with the owner’s consent (for example, a restoration or conservation body) who may not properly be regarded as “occupiers” as such, but who should be desirably consulted. 7. Paragraph 2.18: Applicants are  MPs Consult with: The relevant MPs were therefore advised to seek to involve Peterborough and NW consulted at Stage 2 of the

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken ANNEX 4

Column (1) of Annex 4 (A Stakeholder identification (in Proposed recipients: Project development and design Guide to TWA Procedures) accordance with Column 2 of consultation Content of application – Annex 4 – Consultee -)

1. Works involving new or  Disabled Persons Consult with: Disabled Persons Transport modified passenger transport Transport Advisory Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee formally services. Committee Advisory Committee, train consulted in August 2016. Train  Any local consultative body operating companies and freight operating companies and freight representing recognised operation companies. This operating companies were formally transport user groups includes: Virgin Trains, East consulted in August 2016. Coast, Grand Central / Alliance Rail - now Alliance Rail Holdings, Hull Trains, East Midlands Trains, Cross Country, Great Northern/ Thameslink, DB Schenker, GB Railfreight, Freightliner/ Freightliner Heavy Haul, and ‘East Coast Main Line Authorities’ Group.

2. Works or other proposals  Association of Waterways Not applicable Not applicable relating to inland waterways. Cruising Clubs  Residential Boat Owners Association  British Marine Industries Federation 3. Works affecting land  The London Green Belt Not applicable protected under section Council 6(1)(b) of the Green Belt  Open Spaces Society (London and Home Counties)  Ramblers Association Act 1938. 4. Works affecting green field  Campaign to Protect Rural Consult with: Campaign to Protect Rural sites. England Campaign to Protect Rural England, Campaign for the  Campaign for the England, Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales, Country

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken Protection of Rural Wales Protection of Rural Wales, Land and Business Association,  Country Land and Country Land and Business The relevant County Wildlife Trust, Business Association Association, The relevant County Royal Society for the Protection of  The relevant County Wildlife Trust, Royal Society for Birds, Town and County Planning Wildlife Trust the Protection of Birds, Town and Association formally consulted in  Royal Society for the County Planning Association August 2016. Protection of Birds  Town and County Planning Association 5. Works affecting commons,  The relevant County Not applicable Not applicable open spaces and allotments Wildlife Trust (as defined in section 19(4) of  Open Spaces Society the Acquisition of Land Act  Ramblers Association 1981).  Royal Society for the Protection of Birds 6. Works affecting or adjoining  The National Trust Not applicable Not applicable land belonging to the National Trust. 7. Works affecting agricultural  County Land and Business Consult with: County Land and Business land. Association County Land and Business Association and National Farmers  National Farmers Union Association and National Farmers Union formally consulted in August Union 2016. 8 Works affecting the foreshore,  The relevant County Consult with: County Wildlife Trust and RSPB river estuaries or river banks. Wildlife Trust County Wildlife Trust and RSPB formally consulted in August 2016.  Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) 9. Works interfering with rights of  British Marine Industries Not applicable Not applicable navigation for sea-going Federation vessels.  Chamber of Shipping  Royal Yachting Association 10. Works affecting conservation  Joint Committee of the Not applicable Not applicable areas, listed buildings and National Amenity Societies scheduled monuments. 11. Works affecting other In or adjacent to England, English Not applicable Not applicable nationally important buildings Heritage. or monuments or sites of

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken archaeological interest In or adjacent to Wales, the registered in County Sites & National Assembly for Wales Monuments Records (SMRs). (Cadw) and the Royal Commission on Ancient and Historical Monuments in Wales.

12. Works affecting the  Civic Trust Consult with: Civic Voice and Civic Voice and Royal Town townscape.  Royal Town Planning Royal Town Planning Institute Planning Institute formally Institute consulted in August 2016.  Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment 13. Railway Preservation  Heritage Railway Not applicable Not applicable Schemes. Association 14. Tramway Projects.  National Tramway Not applicable Not applicable Museum 15. Works affecting coastal  Marine Conservation Not applicable Not applicable waters. Society  National Federation of Fishermen’s Organisations

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

[page intentionally blank]

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Appendix 2 – LIST OF CONSULTEES – STAKEHOLDER AND COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER:

Environment Agency Peterborough City Council Auto-Cycle Union British Horse Society Byways and Bridleway Trust Open Spaces Society Ramblers Association British Driving Society Cyclists Touring Club Bretton Parish Council Werrington Neighbourhood Council British Telecommunications PLC Anglian Water UK Power Networks National Grid Vodafone Welland and Deepings Internal Drainage Board Level 3 Communications Church Commissioners Historic England Natural England Transport Focus The Office of Rail and Road/Her Majesty’s Railway Inspectorate The Secretary of State Highways England All affected Landowners Royal Mail Marholm Parish Council Glinton Parish Council Womens Institute Peterborough Fire and Rescue Service Peterborough Police Constabulary Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust Department of Transport Peterborough and NW Cambridgeshire MP TWA Orders Unit Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee East Coast Main Line Authorities Group Train Operation Companies (TOCS) including: Virgin Trains East Coast Grand Central/Alliance Rail – now Alliance Rail Holdings Hull Trains East Midlands Trains Cross Country Great Northern/Thameslink

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Freight Operation Companies (FOCS) including: DB Schenker GB Railfreight Freightliner/ Freightliner Heavy Haul Campaign to Protect Rural England Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales Country Land and Business Association The relevant County Wildlife Trust Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Town and Country Planning Association SUSTRANS Civic Voice Royal Town Planning Institute

COMMUNITY:

Local MPs Local Councillors Members of the local community and the wider public Community interest groups including: Werrington Community Youth Group Werrington Community Volunteer Group Glinton and Peakirk Energy Community Interest Company Peterborough Environment City Trust Dukesmead Resident’s Association Peterborough-Ely-Norwich Rail Users Peterborough Enterprise Partnership

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

[page intentionally blank]

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

APPENDIX 3– WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION PRE-APPLICATION APPROACH TO COMMUNITY CONSULTATION

Werrington Junction Rail Improvement Scheme

Approach to Community Consultation

April 2014

- 1 -

Contents

1. Executive summary ...... 3

2. Network Rail: Who we are ...... 5

3. The Project ...... 5

4. Purpose of the Approach to Community Consultation ...... 6

5. Approach to consultation: strategy ...... 8

6. Consultation tools and techniques ...... 9

7. Indicative programme for consultation: Timeline ...... 11

8. Responding to feedback ...... 12

Appendix 1: Consultation area map ...... 13

- 2 -

1. Executive summary

Network Rail is drawing up proposals for a direct piece of rail infrastructure that will provide a new connection between the Stamford lines on the East Coast Main Line (ECML) and the Great Northern Great Eastern (GNGE) rail lines (which run from Werrington to Doncaster via Lincoln). Known as the Werrington Junction Rail Improvement Scheme (the Project), this investment will enable freight services to leave the ECML and join the GNGE lines without crossing the ECML. This existing crossing movement causes constraints on the existing timetable; its removal will help to create increased capacity on the ECML.

As part of Network Rail’s settlement for Control Period 5; (Network Rail receives funding from the government to improve the railway in 5 yearly periods, the next one of these is Control Period 5, also referred to as CP5) the Secretary of State for Transport has recognised the importance of improving capacity and reducing journey times on the East Coast Main Line between Scotland, the North East, Yorkshire, Eastern England and London.

In combination with the proposed introduction of new rolling stock, the provision of additional capacity on the East Coast Main Line, and the revision of the existing timetable, the Project will also help to provide material improvements in journey times.

In order to deliver this new piece of railway Network Rail has identified two potentially viable solutions, one of which would take the form of a “flyover”, approximately 3km in length, leaving the ECML and passing over the existing lines, joining the GNGE lines. The other comprises a “dive under”, approximately 1.5km long, passing under the existing line to tie in with the GNGE. Both options will undergo consultation with stakeholders and the local community before a single option is selected for more detailed pre-application consultation.

On completion of the scheme, which is known as the Werrinton Junction Rail Improvement Scheme, the investment will help to provide:

- Increased capacity in either direction between London and the North - Improved journey times along the route - Improved reliability as a result of separating slow and fast moving services - Faster journey times for freight trains along the route - Reduced risk of delays to both passenger and freight services

At Network Rail we take our engagement with local communities extremely seriously. With at least 5 million lineside neighbours along the railway, it is vital that we combine our responsibilities to the operational network with our responsibilities to the communities and stakeholders who interact with any facet of the railway. Across each region of the network, we have a dedicated community relations team that work closely with our National Helpline and operational teams within the business to assist stakeholders with any problems or enquiries they may have.

The purpose of community consultation is to inform people living in the vicinity of the land of the proposed works and all interested stakeholders about the scheme so that they have an opportunity to help shape the proposal. Our consultation is aimed at the local communities around the sites of the proposed Project and an area that will be finalised with the input of the local authorities. The consultation area map is included in Appendix 1. Ahead of submitting an

- 3 - application, consultation will be undertaken in accordance with the strategy and programme set out in this document.

The Project is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Development and as such a comprehensive environmental impact assessment will be undertaken and the application will be accompanied by an Environmental Statement under the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009.

We are fully committed to ongoing consultation throughout the planning process, during the construction phase and through to completion of the scheme. It is anticipated the application will be submitted late 2015.

- 4 -

2. Network Rail: Who we are

Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail) owns and operates Britain’s rail infrastructure. We run, maintain and develop Britain’s tracks, signalling systems, rail bridges, tunnels, level crossings, viaducts and 17 key stations. We strive to provide Britain with a safe, reliable and efficient railway fit for the 21st century.

3. The Project

Central government has asked the rail industry develop plans to reduce journey times between London and key northern cities including Leeds, Newcastle and Edinburgh. This will be achieved through a combination of Network Rail infrastructure improvements, new rolling stock and the introduction of a new, revised timetable.

The plans for the Werrington Junction Rail Improvement Scheme, which are currently being drawn up, would see the creation of a new piece of railway providing a new connection from the ECML to the GNGE lines which travel north from Peterborough through Spalding and Lincoln. On completion, it would allow slow moving freight trains to connect to the GNGE lines without crossing the faster moving ECML. Currently this movement slows down passenger trains and places a capacity constraint on the route.

Prior to the development of the current proposals Network Rail examined several other options for achieving the necessary new connection between the ECML and the GNGE lines. These included options to the north, south, east of Peterborough, and options central to Peterborough itself. Whilst certain options satisfied the operational requirements of the railway, they were subsequently discarded due to issues of construction or cost.

Network Rail is now considering two potential options for the new piece of railway. These are being explored as part of early development and feasibility work, and we are seeking feedback from the community on them.

The two options being taken forward for consultation are:

- Flyover: This option provides a new section of railway, leaving the Stamford lines on the west side of the East Coast Main Line, to the GNGE (Great Northern/Great Eastern Joint Line between Werrington and Doncaster via Lincoln) line on its way to Spalding. With an overall length of around 3km, it will start near the Bretton Industrial Area, climb up to cross the ECML on a new skew bridge before continuing at a high level to cross the A15 (Werrington Parkway) and Lincoln Road. It will fall to meet the GNGE before its second bridge under the A15.

- Dive under: This option will also provide a new section of railway, leaving the Stamford lines to the GNGE. It will leave the ECML at approximately the same point as the flyover, will pass under the ECML and then under the A15 before climbing up to ground level and joining the GNGE between the two A15 bridges. Its overall length outside of the current railway boundary will be around 1.5km.

- 5 -

4. Purpose of the Approach to Community Consultation

Network Rail is committed to early and thorough consultation with the local community and interested stakeholders. Before drawing up detailed plans we want to provide people living and working in the vicinity of the land (see consultation area map, appendix 1) of the proposed works with an opportunity to shape the scheme. We also recognise people living outside this area will have an interest in the proposals and we will make efforts to inform them of the consultations through media releases and posters so they can also feedback comments.

The benefits of early pre-application consultation are threefold: . It provides people with an opportunity to comment on and submit opinions about the emerging proposal . It generates feedback that can influence the detail of the proposal and associated mitigation measures . It provides accurate information to those who will be affected by the scheme and help reduce any potential uncertainty.

The consultation will be an iterative process. This will allow interested parties to feedback comments throughout the planning stages well ahead of the final plans being developed. The pre-application consultation carried out in relation to this scheme will be documented and form part of our formal submission to the relevant Planning Authority. The consultation report will set out:

. Consultation activity undertaken . Feedback submitted and how Network Rail has responded to comments . Ways in which the scheme has evolved as a result of consultation and feedback.

The strategy and activity programme in this document are subject to change as the detail of the project progresses and the results of consultation feedback reviewed and analysed.

Environmental Information Both proposed options would require an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to be submitted alongside the application. The EIA will assess the potential environmental impact of the development on a number of factors, likely to include, but subject to agreement from the Planning Authority, noise, visual and air quality impacts. We will consult on environmental information during the various stages of consultation.

We will closely monitor the results of the EIA survey work (noise, construction etc) to fully understand how the scheme will impact on neighbouring properties. If the EIA work identifies any specific impacts on properties we will write to these residents setting out the potential issue, and possible mitigation strategies, so that they can fully engage in the consultation process in an informed and meaningful way.

- 6 -

Consent Requirements for both options

Depending upon which option is taken forward for further development, there are two different types of consent that might apply to our proposals. Regardless of which option is progressed, Network Rail is committed to providing a high quality of consultation appropriate for a scheme of this size:

Flyover Option As the amount of new railway track required outside of Network Rail owned land is currently over 2km, the scheme would be deemed as ‘Nationally Significant’ and an application for a Development Consent Order (DCO) would be required. DCO applications are considered by the Planning Inspectorate, and not determined by the Local Planning Authority (LPA). However, the LPA are involved from the outset of scheme development and will be required to comment upon the scheme by the Planning Inspectorate, providing their views on the principle of development, engagement from Network Rail, and comments on the consultation process. From submission of an application through to decision is ordinarily an 18 month time period.

Dive under Option The dive under option is less than 2km of new railway track and not deemed ‘Nationally Significant’, as a result a DCO is not required. However, authority to construct the railway will still be required, and that will be provided via a Transport and Works Act Order (TWAO), granted from the TWAO Unit. The application process is similar to that of a DCO and involvement from the LPA is required to comment on the scheme, and consultation process. From submission of an application for a TWAO through to decision is ordinarily a 12 month period.

For both the TWA and DCO, consultation with the public, and the ensuing feedback from the public and local stakeholders is key in the decision making process. Network Rail will be required to demonstrate how comments from the public and stakeholders have been taken into account when the application for the scheme is submitted.

- 7 -

5. Approach to consultation: strategy

Before undertaking widespread consultation a copy of this document will be available to view at the following locations: • Online: www.networkrail.co.uk/werrington • By email: [email protected] • Calling the project hotline number: 08457 11 41 41 • Peterborough City Council (address tbc)

An overview of the pre-application consultation strategy for the Werrington Junction Rail Improvement Project is set out below. In addition, phased consultation will also be undertaken with statutory bodies.

Non statutory consultation: Two engineering options • Early consultation with people living in the vicinity of the site of the proposed works as well as interested people living in the wider area. • Two engineering options for the Project will undergo non statutory consultation. The options will be showcased as well as initial environmental information. • The non statutory consultation will provide an opportunity to inform interested parties about the options and gain feedback on how the plans should be progressed. • The feedback will be reviewed ahead of the second round of consultation and used to inform the selection of the final scheme. The final scheme will be one of the options presented in this stage of consultation.

Statutory consultation: Single preferred option • Statutory consultation on the detailed design will be undertaken with people living in the vicinity of the site as well as other interested parties. • This stage will explore the detail of the final scheme including the design, proposed construction methods and the Preliminary Environmental Information. • The feedback submitted will be used to help inform the detail of the final application to the Planning Inspectorate.

Information round: The final scheme and application • The final application documents will be made available for stakeholders and the local community to view at the time of submission. • Further feedback will be sought at this time and reviewed prior to submitting the application.

This phased consultation strategy will allow us to collate feedback at key stages in the design and planning process. Sufficient time will be allocated between each stage of consultation to fully digest the comments before considering how best to progress the scheme.

- 8 -

6. Consultation tools and techniques

A range of informative and consultative techniques will be put in place to help engage the public and stakeholders during the pre-application phase. This will enable us to generate as much feedback as possible and respond to comments before the scheme is prepared for submission.

Written comments and feedback Written comments can be submitted online via the Network Rail • Online website or to [email protected]. A • Letters (freepost) record of comments raised via the helpline number will also be • Helpline reviewed as part of the consultation process. Written comments can also be submitted to Werrington Junction Rail Improvement Scheme, Network Rail, 3rd Floor, Enterprise House, 167-169 Westbourne Terrace, W2 6JX

NB Exact timescales for stage 2 of the consultation will be made available on Network Rail’s website, through the media and in promotional literature issued to stakeholders by Network Rail in relation to this scheme.

The main consultation methods that will be used and associated materials are set out in the table below.

Consultation Methods Consultation materials and techniques Network Rail led events Mail shots • Information sheets Mail shots will be undertaken to provide people living in roads that neighbour the proposed site with information about the scheme and details of the consultation / public exhibitions. Those interested outside this area will be targeted by media releases. Public exhibitions • Exhibition panels Public exhibitions provide an excellent opportunity to provide • Briefing note information and listen to the public. As part of stage 1 • Feedback forms and consultation we will hold public exhibitions and collate as much questionnaires feedback as possible on the emerging plans. These will take place at various times of the day so that as many people as possible can attend. Network Rail project materials Telephone helpline • 24-hour telephone We run a 24-hour telephone helpline service. The representatives helpline will be fully briefed on the scheme ahead of the consultation and updated during the duration of the project. Project web pages • Project overview Information about the scheme and forthcoming consultation • Drawings / maps events will be uploaded onto Network Rail’s website. This will • Any relevant reports include a summary of the proposal and any relevant documentation. The information will be amended as the scheme

- 9 - evolves. Project updates and flyers • Letters Letters will be used to update the public and stakeholders on the • Freepost feedback detail of the scheme, promote consultation events and invite facility feedback from people that are unable to attend the exhibitions and meetings. The letters will also carry details of the project hotline number and web-link. Stakeholder and third party events / activities Stakeholder and resident meetings • Briefing notes We will offer to, and where able, attend meetings organised by • Maps / plans stakeholders to update people on the proposal and invite • Feedback forms feedback. These briefings will include Parish Councils. This method of consultation will be ongoing throughout the duration of the project. Council meetings • Presentations We will offer to, and where able, undertake presentations and • Briefing notes Q&A sessions with councillors at various stages of the project. This will provide an opportunity to update members on the progress of the scheme and to work through any issues at the earliest opportunity. Media relations activity Media announcements • Press releases The media provides a useful way of promoting the scheme and • Adverts publicising consultation events. Press releases will be issued to • Letters the local media - print, broadcast and online outlets. This will be supplemented with advertising at key stages of the project.

- 10 -

7. Indicative programme for consultation: Timeline The following timeline sets out the pre-application consultation programme. The programme may change over the lifetime of the project as the detail of the scheme evolves. Stakeholder discussion will be progressed as necessary.

Proposed date Activity Spring / Summer Non statutory consultation: Two proposed options 2014 . Meetings with councils and key stakeholders (including Parish Councils) . Issue information letters and flyers . Project information uploaded onto www.networkrail.co.uk/north . Public exhibition road show / drop-in sessions . Press announcements . Feedback forms, email address and project hotline number . Meetings will also be held with interested community groups and parish councils as / when required An analysis Analysis of consultation feedback period will take . Assessing feedback about the potential scheme options place during the . Understanding issued raised and using feedback to inform the consultation (to selection of a single alignment consider early representations) and immediately after the consultation (to consider late representations). Winter 2014 Statutory consultation: the selected scheme (NB exact dates . A round of activity will be held with key stakeholders and community for the statutory groups following the selection of a single alignment to showcase consultation will more detailed designs. be published on . An exhibition road show will be held near the vicinity of the proposed Network Rail’s site. website and . Consultation will also be undertaken at this stage on Preliminary issued in Environmental Information promotional . This activity will assess views relating to the detail of the selected material to scheme and any associated issues that need to be considered interested parties before the plans are finalised well in advance . Follow up meetings will be held with interested stakeholder groups. of the start of the This will provide an opportunity to explore any potential issues and consultation) to being to identify solutions . Latest information will be uploaded onto the project website www.networkrail.co.uk/werrington An analysis Analysis of consultation feedback period will take . Consideration of feedback relating to the selected scheme and place during further environmental information consultation (to . Review and amend the proposal to respond to consultation feedback

- 11 -

consider early . Finalise the scheme representations) and immediately after the consultation (to consider late representations). Summer 2015 Information round: The final scheme . Update website . Update information for councillors / key stakeholders / Parish Councils . Update leaflet to residents . Media announcements

8. Responding to feedback We will collate the consultation feedback and review comments before finalising the scheme. To do this we have allocated an analysis period ahead of submitting the application. This will provide sufficient time to fully assess the comments and explore ways of modifying the plans where / if appropriate.

We recognise the importance of keeping the public and stakeholders informed about the consultation feedback and we have put in place reporting mechanisms to enable this to happen. This includes:

. An update letter / leaflet setting out a high level summary of the consultation feedback and next steps. This will be sent to respondents that supply their contact details. A copy of the letter / leaflet will also be uploaded onto the project webpage.

. A full consultation report will be prepared at the time of submission summarising the activity carried out and the feedback submitted. It will set out an overview of how the Project has been amended in response to consultation and, if necessary, explain why certain aspects of the Project have not been changed in response to certain comments. The consultation report and a summary will be made available in public libraries, council offices in the local area and on the project webpage. The consultation report will form part of the formal application documentation pack.

. A presentation will be offered to councillors and, where appropriate, other interested stakeholders / community groups.

- 12 -

Appendix 1: Consultation area map Key: boundary areas for the community consultation.

Consultees within the redline area will be notified of the consultation through direct mail

Relevant Consultees outside of this area will be notified of the consultation through ward councillors, news releases, and online info on community news websites

- 13 -

Werrington Grade Separation Pre-Application Approach to Community Consultation

Document reference 140365-ARP-CON-022 Author Network Rail Date August 2016 Revision number 4

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

CONTENTS Page

1 Executive Summary 1

2 Network Rail: Who We Are 3

3 The Project 4 3.2 The options previously consulted on 5 3.3 The preferred option 6

4 Consent for the Scheme 8

5 Approach to Community Consultation 9 5.1 Introduction 9 5.2 Overarching public consultation and engagement strategy 10 5.3 Stage 1: Two engineering options - completed summer 2014 11 5.4 Stage 2 - Pre-application Public Consultation: Single preferred option - autumn 2016 13 5.5 Stage 3: Information round: The final scheme and application 14

6 Consultation Tools and Techniques 15

7 Summary of Consultation Activities 17

8 Reporting on the Consultation 19

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

1 Executive Summary

1.1.1 This documents sets out the approach to community consultation for the Werrington Grade Separation Scheme. Before undertaking widespread consultation a copy of this document will be made available online at www.networkrail.co.uk/werrington and the approach discussed and agreed with Peterborough City Council. 1.1.2 As part of Network Rail’s funding from the government the Secretary of State for Transport has recognised the importance of improving capacity and reducing journey times on the East Coast Main Line between Scotland, the North East, Yorkshire, Eastern England and London. 1.1.3 In combination with the proposed introduction of new rolling stock, other schemes on the East Coast Main Line (ECML), and the revision of the existing timetable, this project will help to deliver additional capacity on the East Coast Main Line. 1.1.4 The proposed project will involve the construction of a rail chord (line) to provide a new connection between the Stamford lines, to the west of the ECML, and the Great Northern Great Eastern (GNGE) rail lines, to the east of the ECML. 1.1.5 This existing crossing movement causes constraints on the existing timetable as the freight trains, and occasional passenger service, have to pass over the high speed East Coast lines. This project will remove this conflict. 1.1.6 Network Rail is planning to submit an application for an Order under the Transport and Works Act (TWA) to the Secretary of State for Transport in December 2016 for the dive-under scheme. This type of application is commonly used for railway projects where third party land and powers to operate a railway are required. The TWA would grant planning (and associated) permissions for the works together with approval to compulsory purchase (temporary and permanent) land required to deliver and operate the scheme. 1.1.7 A two stage approach has been adopted to consultation. The first stage included early consultation with the public and stakeholders on the scheme options held in summer 2014 and an information round held in October 2015. A second stage of public consultation on the preferred option is proposed for September 2016, in advance of the application being submitted in December 2016. In addition, phased consultation has and will continue with relevant statutory bodies, outlined in section 5.1.6.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 1 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

1.1.8 Public consultation is being undertaken in accordance with the strategy and programme set out in this document. The approach and findings of the consultation will be documented and reported in a consultation report which will form part of the TWAO application. 1.1.9 The scheme is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Development and as such, a comprehensive EIA is currently being undertaken and the application will be accompanied by an Environmental Statement under the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009. This document will demonstrate any environmental impact the development could have, including but not exclusively, impact on visual amenity, noise, vibration, and community, amongst others. The document will also show how Network Rail intends to mitigate any impact highlighted.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 2 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

2 Network Rail: Who We Are

2.1.1 Network Rail owns and operates Britain’s rail infrastructure. We run, maintain and develop Britain’s tracks, signalling systems, rail bridges, tunnels, level crossings, viaducts and many key stations. We strive to provide Britain with a safe, reliable and efficient railway fit for the 21st century. 2.1.2 Following reclassification as an arm’s-length central government body in 2014, we retain the commercial and operational freedom to manage Britain’s railways infrastructure within regulatory and control frameworks. Our framework agreement1 with the Department for Transport sets out how we interact in terms of financial management and corporate governance. 2.1.3 Network Rail’s income comes from three sources: direct grants from the Department for Transport and Transport Scotland; charges for track access levied on the passenger and freight train operators that use our network; and income from our commercial property. 2.1.4 We receive our government funding in five-year blocks known as ‘control periods’. We are currently in Control Period 5 (2014 to 2019).

1 Department for Transport, Network Rail framework agreement, 1 September 2014 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/network-rail-framework-agreement

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 3 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

3 The Project

3.1.1 Central government has asked the rail industry to develop plans to increase capacity and reduce journey times between London and key northern cities including Leeds, Newcastle and Edinburgh. This will be achieved through a combination of Network Rail infrastructure improvements, new rolling stock and the introduction of a new, revised timetable. 3.1.2 The project would see the creation of a new chord to provide a new connection between the Stamford lines, to the west of the East Coast Main Line (ECML), and the Great Northern Great Eastern (GNGE) rail lines, to the east of the ECML. 3.1.3 Known as the Werrington Grade Separation Scheme, this infrastructure will enable freight services to leave the Stamford lines or the East Coast, and join the GNGE lines without crossing the high speed ECML at ground level. The existing crossing movement causes constraints on the existing timetable as the freight trains, and occasional passenger service, have to pass over the high speed East Coast lines; its removal will help to create increased capacity for additional services on the ECML.

Figure 1: Location Plan

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 4 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

The options previously consulted on 3.2.1 Network Rail examined several options for removing the conflicting moves over the ECML. These included options to the north, south, and east of Peterborough, and options at Peterborough station itself. Whilst certain options satisfied the operational requirements of the railway, they were subsequently discarded due to issues of construction, maintainability, or cost. 3.2.2 Two potential solutions for this new section of railway were identified and previously consulted on in summer 2014. These are as follows: - Fly-over: This option would provide a new section of railway, leaving the Stamford lines on the west side of the East Coast Main Line, to the GNGE (Great Northern/Great Eastern Joint Line between Werrington and Doncaster via Lincoln) line on its way to Spalding. With an overall length of around 3km, it would start near the Bretton Industrial Area, climb up to cross the ECML on a new skew bridge before continuing at a high level to cross the A15 (Werrington Parkway) and Lincoln Road. It would fall to meet the GNGE before its second bridge under the A15. - Dive-under: This option would also provide a new section of railway, leaving the Stamford lines to the GNGE. It would leave the ECML at approximately the same point as the flyover, would pass under the ECML and then under the A15 before climbing up to ground level and joining the GNGE between the two A15 bridges. Its overall length outside of the current railway boundary would be around 1.5km.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 5 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

The preferred option 3.3.1 The two potential options were presented to stakeholders and the public for consultation in summer 2014. Around 400 members of public attended community consultation events in the local area. Consultees were asked if they had a preference for either the dive under or the flyover. The responses were in favour of the dive-under with 69% of respondents stating this as their preferred option. 3.3.2 Following this consultation, Network Rail completed surveys of the area, and spoke to statutory stakeholders about the plans. A number of topics were considered when deciding upon which option to progress to further design and have as the preferred option, including (but not exclusively):  Consultation feedback (both public and technical);  Technical requirements;  Environmental (including visual impact);  Cost;  Maintenance;  Constructability;  Hydrology; and  Utilities in the area 3.3.3 Based on the factors above, the dive-under option was selected as the preferred option for the project and has been taken forward for further development. 3.3.4 Further work has been progressed on the dive-under, including how Network Rail intend to build the chord, which this is ongoing now the main design and build contractor has been appointed. At a high level, works are likely to include:  Highway amendments at access and exit points;  Extension of Gas Works Lane to the West of A15;  Large excavation underneath the ECML;  Temporary site compounds for the duration of the build;  Hydrology assets to be moved (Brook Drain for example);

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 6 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

Figure 2: The preferred ‘dive-under’ option *indicative alignment

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 7 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

4 Consent for the Scheme

4.1.1 In order to build the new section of the railway, some of the construction activities will require Network Rail to secure additional land. As a result Network Rail will be submitting an application for a Transport and Works Act Order (TWAO) to secure the necessary permissions and powers for construction and operation of the project. 4.1.2 The TWAO would cover all elements of the dive-under scheme, including those elements within and outside of Network Rail land ownership, and would provide Network Rail with planning consent and the power to secure the additional land required. 4.1.3 The application under the Transport and Works Act Order will be submitted to the Secretary of State in December 2016. 4.1.4 The scheme will require an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to be submitted alongside the application. The EIA will assess the potential environmental impact of the development on a number of factors, likely to include, noise, visual and air quality impacts. We consult on environmental information during the various stages of consultation. 4.1.5 We will closely monitor the results of the EIA survey work to fully understand how the scheme could impact on neighbouring land and properties.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 8 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

5 Approach to Community Consultation

Introduction 5.1.1 Network Rail is committed to early and thorough consultation with the local community and interested stakeholders. Before drawing up detailed plans we aim to provide people living and working in the vicinity of the scheme of the proposed works with an opportunity to shape the scheme. 5.1.2 The benefits of pre-application consultation include the following:  It provides people with an opportunity to comment on and submit opinions about the emerging proposal  It generates feedback to help influence the detail of the proposal and associated mitigation measures  It helps to identify those who could be affected by the scheme, and provide them with accurate information to help reduce any potential uncertainty. 5.1.3 A two stage approach has been adopted to public consultation, including early consultation on two options with local people and stakeholders between summer 2014 and October 2015 and a second stage of public consultation on the preferred option that will be carried out in September 2016, in advance of the application being submitted in December 2016. 5.1.4 The approach and findings of Stage 1 consultation: Two engineering options is set out in section 5.3. 5.1.5 The approach to Stage 2 pre-application consultation: Single preferred option is set out in section 5.4. 5.1.6 In addition, phased consultation has and will continue to be carried out with relevant statutory bodies including Peterborough City Council, Environment Agency, Natural England, Historic England, local utility suppliers including drainage boards, gas, water and electricity suppliers, amongst other key stakeholders. 5.1.7 The approach and findings of the pre-application consultation will be documented and reported in a consultation report, which will form part of the TWAO application.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 9 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

6 Overarching public consultation and engagement strategy

Programme Dates

Stage 1 consultation: Two engineering Summer 2014 options

Feedback analysis and dissemination Summer 2014 – October 2015 Announcement of the preferred option October 2015

Stage 2 pre-application consultation: September 2016 Single preferred option

Feedback analysis and dissemination September – November 2016

Submission of Transport and Works Act December 2016 Order

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 10 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

Stage 1: Two engineering options - completed summer 2014 6.1.1 Early consultation was undertaken with people living in the vicinity of the proposed works as well as interested parties from the wider area. 6.1.2 Two engineering options for the project were showcased along with initial emerging environmental information. 6.1.3 The Stage 1 consultation provided an opportunity to inform stakeholders and the public about the options and gather feedback on the proposals. 6.1.4 Around 400 people attended consultation events in the local community. The feedback received was collated and analysed and used to help inform the selection of the preferred option. 6.1.5 Of the 142 hard copy/online responses received 47% of respondees strongly supported Network Rail’s plans to improve passenger services on the ECML, while 30% agreed, 11% were undecided, and 11% disagreed or strongly disagreed (1% did not answer. 6.1.6 69% of respondees preferred the dive-under option, 18% the fly over and 13% were undecided.

OPTION PREFERENCE RESULTS undecided 13%

fly over 18%

dive-under 69%

Figure 3: The results of the stage one consultation feedback for the two options presented: the fly over and dive-under options

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 11 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

6.1.7 Based on several factors, including the consultation feedback, the dive-under option was selected as the preferred option for the scheme. 6.1.8 The preferred option was announced in October 2015 and two public drop-in sessions were held at the Hodgson Community Centre. 6.1.9 Since then, further work has been done to develop the detail of the proposals for the single preferred option and the updated proposals will undergo further consultation in September 2016.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 12 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

Stage 2 - Pre-application Public Consultation: Single preferred option - autumn 2016 6.2.1 Consultation on the detailed design of the proposed scheme will be carried out with people living in the vicinity of the site as well as other interested parties. 6.2.2 This stage will explore the detail and gather further feedback on the single-preferred option, proposed construction methods and the preliminary environmental information. This stage will also help to address any queries before the plan for the dive under option is finalised. 6.2.3 The feedback submitted will be used to help inform the detail of the final application. 6.2.4 The consultation event dates and times will be announced at least two weeks ahead of the first event. 6.2.5 Following the events, feedback provided will be analysed and used to inform the final scheme that is submitted in the TWAO. We will update online materials and disseminate updated information about the final plans to stakeholders.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 13 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

Stage 3: Information round: The final scheme and application 6.3.1 The final application documents will be made available for stakeholders and the local community to view at the time of submission. At this stage we will carry out the following:  Update the website  Update information for councillors / key stakeholders / Parish Councils  Update information for residents  Media announcements.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 14 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

7 Consultation Tools and Techniques

7.1.1 A range of informative and consultative techniques have been used throughout the delivery of the strategy which are summarised in the table below.

Consultation Methods Consultation materials and techniques

Mail shots Rail information sheets Mail shots have been undertaken to provide people living in roads that neighbour the proposed site with information about the scheme and details of the consultation / public exhibitions. Those interested outside this area have been targeted by media releases.

Public exhibitions Exhibition panels Public exhibitions to provide information and listen Briefing note to the public. Public exhibitions are planned on a Feedback forms and range of days and times of the day so that as many questionnaires people as possible could attend.

Network Rail project materials

Telephone helpline 24-hour telephone We provide a 24-hour telephone helpline service. helpline: 03457 11 41 The representatives were fully briefed on the 41 scheme ahead of each stage of consultation and are being updated during the duration of the project.

Written comments and feedback Written comments have been submitted online via the Network Rail website and to the project email address. A record of comments raised via the helpline number has been reviewed as part of the consultation process. Written comments have also been submitted to the project postal address. Project web pages Web page address: Information about the scheme and forthcoming www.networkrail.co.uk/ consultation events was included on Network Rail’s werrington website. This includes a summary of the proposal Project overview and relevant documentation. The information is Drawings / maps being amended as the scheme evolves. This will Any relevant reports be updated in advance of the stage two consultation.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 15 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

Project updates and flyers Letters Letters have been used to update the public and Freepost feedback stakeholders on the detail of the scheme, promote facility consultation events and invite feedback from people that are unable to attend the exhibitions and meetings. The letters include details of the project hotline number and web-link. Letter will be sent in advance inviting people to take part in the stage two consultation.

Stakeholder and third party events / activities

Stakeholder and Parish Council meeting Briefing notes As part of the early consultation it was offered, and Maps / plans where able, meetings were attended which were Feedback forms organised by stakeholders to update people on the proposal and invite feedback. These briefings included Parish Councils. This method of consultation is ongoing throughout the duration of the project. A second round of residents meetings will take place at the beginning of the stage two consultation in September 2016.

Council meetings Presentations Presentations and Q&A sessions were offered to Briefing notes councillors at various stages of the project. This provided an opportunity to update members on the progress of the scheme and to work through any issues at the earliest opportunity. A follow-up briefing session will take place on 30 August 2016 in advance of the stage two public consultation.

Media relations activity Media announcements Press releases The media provides a useful way of promotion of Adverts the scheme and publicising consultation events. Letters Press releases were issued to the local media through print, broadcast and online outlets. This was supplemented with advertising at early stages of the project. Stage two events will be publicised through the same channels.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 16 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

8 Summary of Consultation Activities

8.1.1 The table below summarises the key features of the stage 1 & 2 public consultation for the scheme.

Stage/Date Summary of Activity Stage 1: Early  Meetings with councils and key stakeholders Consultation on the (including Parish Councils) Options  Information letters and flyers issued  Project information uploaded onto Summer 2014 www.networkrail.co.uk  Public exhibition road show/drop-in sessions held in 4 local venues  MP briefings.

Analysis of  Analysis took place during the consultation consultation (to consider early representations) and feedback immediately after the consultation (to consider late representations).  Feedback was analysed and understanding issues raised and feedback used to inform the selection of a single alignment.

Announcement of the  Press announcements preferred scheme  Feedback forms, email address and project hotline number October 2015  Meetings have also been held with interested community groups and parish councils as and when required in addition to MP and councillor briefings. These included Peterborough City Council, Environment Agency, National Grid, the Peterborough and North West Cambridgeshire MPs, Werrington Residents Association, local businesses, and the Werrington North, Glinton & Wittering, Bretton and Newborough local councillors.  Information events took place in October 2015 to provide the community with information on the preferred option, following the stage one consultation events in 2014.

Stage 2: The  A round of pre-application public consultation preferred option will take place in September 2016 including briefing to key stakeholders and community groups, this will allow us to collect views September 2016 relating to the detail of the selected scheme,

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 17 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

update the scheme stakeholders and address any queries before the plan for the dive-under option is finalised.

Analysis of Following the events, feedback provided will be consultation analysed and used to support the TWAO feedback application submission.

Information round:  Update website The final scheme  Update information for councillors / key stakeholders / Parish Councils Early 2017  Update information for residents  Media announcements

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 18 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

9 Reporting on the Consultation

9.1.1 A full consultation report will be submitted to support the TWAO application summarising the activity carried out and the feedback submitted. It will set out an overview of how the scheme has been amended in response to consultation and, if necessary, explain why certain aspects of the scheme has not been changed in response to certain comments. 9.1.2 The consultation report will form part of the formal application documentation pack and will be available to view when the application is submitted. The consultation report and a summary will be made available in public libraries, council offices in the local area and on the project webpage.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 19 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

Appendix 1

Map for stage one consultation

Consultees within the red line area were notified of the consultation through direct mail. Relevant consultees outside of this area were notified of consultation through ward councillors, news releases, and online information.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 20 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

Network Rail Werrington Grade Separation Scheme Approach to Community Consultation: July Update

Appendix 2

Map for stage two consultation

Consultees within the red line area will be notified of the consultation through direct mail. Relevant consultees outside of this area will be notified of consultation through ward councillors, news releases, and online information. The boundary has been amended in consultation with Peterborough City Council, to reflect the potential impacts of the preferred option.

140365-ARP-CON-022 | Revision 4 | 11 August 2016 Page 21 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\MIDLANDS\JOBS\247000\247906-00 WERRINGTON\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-07 CONSULTATION\02 WERRINGTON\WERRINGTON PAACC\UPDATED WERRINGTON PAACC 11 08 16_DRAFT 4.DOCX

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

[page intentionally blank]

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken APPENDIX 4 – Stage 1 (2014) WERRINGTON PRE-APPLICATION COMMUNITY CONSULTATION

Issue Detailed Issue Number of mentions from Network Rail’s position and where applicable, consultees on each issue where further information is available Noise  Flyover would create more 39 Please refer to ES Chapter 13 Noise and noise pollution Vibration and Appendix L and alternative  Ensure noise does not impact options are considered in the ES Chapter 3. residents outside working Core working hours will be 08:00 to 18:00, hours Monday to Friday, and 08:00 to 13:00 on  Will noise reducing Saturday with an hour either side for set-up landscaping be implemented? and close-down, which will include deliveries  The dive under would have and short-term periods for spoil removal less of a noise impact activities. Sunday working is not proposed as  Has a noise survey been part of core hours. However, it is possible that undertaken? non-disturbing repairs or maintenance may  Will affected residents be need to be undertaken on Sundays. provided with triple glazing as a noise reducing feature? Working hours will also include 24 hour/7 day working for tunnelling works and during any track possessions. The indicative construction programme shows that Sunday working is likely to take place intermittently on: •The Stamford lines during the periods from September to December 2018, and June to October 2019; •The ECML during the period from June to October 2019; and •The GNGE during the period from May to August 2020.

1. Any opportunities that the scheme may provide to reduce noise levels must be considered in the context of any steps that are being taken

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

by Network Rail and the railway industry as part of the Noise Action Plan: Railways. Network Rail is already implementing a rail grinding regime on the network to improve the quality of the tracks, including the ECML which is providing demonstrable benefits in terms of noise reduction. The noise predictions and monitoring data obtained for the scheme would also suggest that the actual exposure to railway noise is already significantly lower than that predicted with the UK Calculation of Railway Noise methodology. 2. Noise mitigations on the existing track include the plans to phase out many existing high speed train sets as part of the Intercity Express Programme, which is likely to reduce railway noise levels further. Reducing railway noise through the rail grinding programme (see above) and the introduction of new rolling stock is considered the sustainable approach to the reduction of railway noise. The relocation of the predominant traffic flow between the ECML and the GNGE via the new dive under route will re-locate operational traffic further west from David’s Close and Gasgoine. There will be construction hoarding provided adjacent to works at this location. Visual impact  The flyover would be an 26 Alternative options are considered in the ES eyesore and visually intrusive Chapter 3, and referred to ES Chapter 12  The dive under would be less ‘Landscape and Visual’ and Appendix K. visually intrusive

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

 Could diver under be a cut and cover?

Property value inc.  Will compensation be provided 20 As above, alternatives are considered in the proximity of for the devaluation of ES. houses / residents properties near the railway line? With regard to the developer claims, Network  The line should be moved Rail, as part of their licenced obligations, have further away from housing to provide infrastructure to allow Train and  Developers assured Freight operating companies to use the tracks prospective homeowners the and promote economic growth. This is driven railway was a ‘sleepy’ line with by market forces (in particular for freight) and 2/3 trains a day means the use of a rail line can increase and  The line should be moved decrease over time. away from residential areas The direct impact of the new line on land and entirely, such as a following property is assessed as part of the TWAO, and the main line and then running affected land and home owners are contacted north of Glinton. directly.

More information  Will there be some method of 18 Network Rail has provided an updated visual required (including visual display so people can display with additional scheme detail in formal visual see what both options will look consultations in September 2016. Full detail is representation) like? provided within the TWAO application.

 Would like to know more detail Affected homeowners have been consulted by at the next stage? Network Rail.  Residents whose houses will be effected should be kept Specialist engineering contractors were at the more informed September 2016 consultation and have  Would be good to get more informed the technical assessments within the engineering detail ES.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Environmental  The dive under would have 18 (wider inc. land less of an impact on wildlife Please refer to the ES Chapter 12 ‘Biodiversity’ usage)  Both schemes would have and Appendix K and an assessment of the minimal impact as land is impacts on best and most versatile (BMV) land is considered within ES Chapter 6 ‘Agriculture farmland with no known and Soils’ and Appendix E. protected species  It’s a shame to lose some of the countryside

Road / drivers /  Supportive of the effort to 16 Please refer to ES Chapter 15 ‘Traffic & traffic transfer container traffic from Transport’ and Appendix M. roads to railways  Concerned about the impacts on the roads

Construction inc.  Ensure that workers remain 16 Network Rail’s responsibility to line side worker behaviour professional and swearing is neighbours is a high priority. not audible  Provide toilets for walkers, Refer to ES Chapter 15 ‘Traffic & Transport’ and Appendix M. make workers aware of horses

in the area Network Rail has consulted with the British  Construction traffic would Horse Society on suitable surfaces for severely impact Hurn Road bridleways and shall duly adapt the design to which is narrow single provide an appropriate equestrian surface. carriageway A full and detailed hazard assessment shall be conducted to ensure the identified hazard between equestrian users and other traffic is appropriately managed. This shall consider, but not be limited to, dismounting blocks, signage, warning lights and fencing.

Concerns around  The increased amount of rail 16 The ES has reviewed a number of topics

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken increased services traffic will be intrusive to including noise, vibration and visual impact, nearby residents. Previously and models the existing use of the ECML, only 1 or 2 trains an hour GNGE and Stamford lines, but also future would pass by growth on the ECML (the project helps facilitate additional capacity on ECML, not GNGE or Stamford). The impact of the increase on the ECML is assessed in the relevant ES chapters.

Alternative  Not enough knowledge of 15 Alternative options are considered in the ES solutions alternative solutions Chapter 3.  Improvements to the ECML instead of diverting freight onto smaller line New station / wider  Can there not be a small 13 There are no plans at present to provide a benefits to station in Werrington? station at Werrington. Werrington  There are no community benefits to Werrington Please refer to ES Chapter 14 ‘Socio- economics’.

The operational phase will not result in any significant socio-economic effects for the local economy or amenity; there will be beneficial effects at the national/strategic level for passenger trains and rail freight in terms of journey times and efficiency.

Supportive of  Will improve the services to 11 It should be noted that the scheme output is scheme Spalding, Boston & Lincoln not to improve regional services but reduce and is welcomed conflicts on the ECML and help to provide  Seems very similar to the additional capacity on the ECML. Hitchin flyover which is an impressive piece of

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

engineering

Keep residents  Lots of consultation will be 11 Finance is secured as part of an allocation of informed, thorough needed funding for improving of services on the ECML consultation  Continuing forums will be but we do not have the required consent to welcomed on the project deliver the works. This consent will not be forthcoming without a full and genuine  Residents have no a consultation process. A decision has been meaningful say on the project, taken to pursue a solution which involves new Network Rail will progress with rail infrastructure at Werrington Junction; this project regardless however this will not progress without the necessary consent. Public consultation is a vital part of achieving is and we are seeking feedback on our plans at an early stage.

Pedestrians,  Can it be confirmed the project 10 All pedestrian crossings over the railway will be footpaths, cyclists will not affect maintained throughout the scheme. The footpaths/cycleways replacement bridge at Cock Lane shall be built  Will the bridge on Foxcovert further north of the existing footbridge to allow continuation of this route until the old bridge is Road be accessible to mobility decommissioned and removed. A bridge shall scooters and bicycles be constructed adjacent to the A15 to provide  If the footbridge at Dukesmead continuation of crossing from Werrington to the is closed this would create a Hurn Road area whilst works are ongoing to lengthy alternative route widen Lincoln Road footbridge over the neew tracks.

Hurn Road will be permanently closed to vehicular traffic where it passes beneath the A15, with a replacement route provided by upgrading the existing track off Gasworks Lane. A permanent multi-user access will be provided to maintain the existing access and provide access to the bus stops on the A15, and to Lincoln Road for non-motorised users

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

(NMUs). There will be no difference for NMUs in travel time and distance.

Under the A15 Werrington Parkway bridge, a replacement walkway will be segregated from new tracks and positioned to the north side of the bridge span. A 2.5m wide NMU access will be provided from Lincoln Road to the bus stop on the west side of the A15, via the bridge.

The bridge at Wedgewood Way/Marholm Road and Foxcovert Road is not affected by the scheme and shall not be re-designed or temporarily closed in any manner. Speed up process  It should be done quicker than 5 The project is subject to TWAO determination 2019 period. The programme allows for 18 months based on Network Rail’s experience of other schemes. Archaeology &  Assurance the John Clare 4 Please refer to ES Chapter 8 and Appendix G. heritage brickwork will not be destroyed  Will an archaeological survey Network Rail is grateful the John Clare be undertaken? brickwork has been raised in consultation. It is not anticipated as part of the scheme this shall  The area near Maxey Cut is an be removed. De-vegetation required allowing area of national significance so proximate construction works should make the full archaeological work would John Clare mural more visible following need to be done. completion of the scheme.

The project boundary does not include Maxey Cut. Electrification  Will dive under be able to 3 The dive under will allow for future accommodate potential electrification but electrification of the dive electrification in the future under is not in Network Rail’s committed  The rolling stock should be business plan.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

upgraded with electrification ECML rolling stock is being upgraded in the Inner City Express Programme (IEP) programme. Be aware of gas  There is a high pressure gas 3 Network Rail has dismissed the flyover option. main main next to the flyover Full consultation with National Grid has been proposal undertaken.

Improve level  Too increase frequency of 2 The project does not alter the operation of crossings trains, level crossing work is existing level crossings. required first

Trains too  Train travel is too expensive 1 Network Rail is not responsible for applying the expensive for most pricing structure for train services.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

APPENDIX 5a – Stage 2 (2016) WERRINGTON STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION

Item Category Issue raised by consultee Network Rail’s position 1 Noise/Vibration CBRE on behalf of Lloyds Banking Group Please refer to: Concern over the noise and vibration impacts that could arise as a result of the construction and operational phases of the proposed Construction scheme. ES Main Statement: Chapter 17: Table 17.1: Summary of Mitigation Piling activities may impact sensitive equipment in the Data Centre. and Residual Effects: Noise and The scoping report outlining main chapters of the EIA does not have Vibration (condition for Code of sufficient information to assess noise impacts. Construction Practice (CoCP) Part B Noise and Vibration Management Plan)

Operation ES Main Statement: Chapter 14: Section 14.5.1.2, paragraph 1149

Detailed mitigation regarding noise and vibration will be formally agreed with PCC through planning conditions to be attached to the Order. A Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) will be submitted to and approved by PCC and this will include a Noise and Vibration Management plan, including a construction methodology assessment.

The ES which supports the TWAO application, reports the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the scheme as well as the

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

mitigation measures which will be put in place. Chapter 13 of the ES ‘Noise and Vibration’, reports on the assessments that have been undertaken, including a noise and vibration section.

Network Rail has met with representatives of Lloyds Bank and Lloyds are appointing consultants to set up a working group with the Network Rail project team to further understand impacts to Lloyds Data Centre.

2 Environment – CBRE on behalf of Lloyds Banking Group Flood Risk Lloyds Banking Group wants assurances that works on Marholm Please refer to point 1 above and ES Brook/Brook Drain will not increase flood risk in the area. 60% of the Volume III: Technical Appendices: land at Stirling Way that LBG owns is within Flood Zone 3. There needs Appendix N: Water Resources: to be more indication of what impact moving the watercourse will have Document N2: Flood Risk on the flood risk of LBG’s land and wider area. Assessment (FRA) Section 4.2.5 (no effects stated).

A Flood Risk Assessment is referenced in the ES. The detail of this assessment has been worked on in conjunction with the Environment Agency, PCC, and Welland & Deepings Internal Drainage Board.

Fluvial hydraulic modelling has been undertaken to ensure that the proposed changes to the watercourses do not increase fluvial

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

flood risk. Changes to the configuration will also reduce the risk of flooding to the car parking area within the Thomas Cook Business Park. The design team have engaged and worked with the Environment Agency and PCC to ensure their wider objectives in terms of improving the water quality and Water Framework Directive related improvements for the Marholm Brook and Folly River are incorporated into the overall scheme design.

Network Rail is not increasing flood risk as a result of this development.

3 Environment – Anglian Water Services Limited Water Assets Assets expected to be affected, with the realigning of Brook Drain and See Section 2 above regarding Brook subsequent shift in Anglian Water’s water main. Anglian Water require Drain. further discussion with Network Rail concerning the TWAO wording before submission to the Secretary of State. Network Rail has engaged with Anglian Water concerning the diversion of existing utilities proximate to Brook Drain and Lincoln Road, and agreed in principle suitable re-modelling and/or routing for affected infrastructure. Allowance for diversions has been accommodated in the proposed red line boundary. As the design progresses, further working groups will be established with Anglian

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Water. 4 Environment - Natural England Please refer to ES Chapter 9 Biodiversity ‘Biodiversity’ and Appendix H. The Natural England advises that the potential impact of the proposal upon assessment describes predicted features of nature conservation interest and opportunities for habitat impacts to ecological features and creation/enhancement should be included within this assessment in appropriate mitigation measures accordance with CIEEM guidance. (including habitat creation and enhancement) that will be The ES should thoroughly assess the potential for the proposal to implemented as part of the Proposed affect statutorily designated sites. Should a Likely Significant Effect on Scheme in accordance with CIEEM3 a European/Internationally designated site be identified or be uncertain, guidance. the competent authority (in this case the Local Planning Authority) may

need to prepare an Appropriate Assessment. Please refer to ES Chapter 9 There are no nationally or internationally designated nature ‘Biodiversity’. No significant effect on conservation sites within 2km of this proposal. However, the applicant a European/internationally is encouraged to use Natural England’s Impact Risk Zones tool, designated site is predicted from the available on www.magic.gov.uk, to identify whether any particular Proposed Scheme and hence a aspect of the proposal may pose a risk to Sites of Special Scientific Habitats Regulations Assessment Interest (SSSIs) through indirect impacts. and Appropriate Assessment are not required. The ES should include a full assessment of the direct and indirect effects of the development on the features of special interest within any The Natural England Impact Risk SSSI likely to be at risk and should identify such mitigation measures Zone tool (www.magic.gov.uk) was as may be required in order to avoid, minimise or reduce any adverse used and there is no risk to Sites of significant effects. Natura 2000 network site conservation objectives Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) are available on our internet site through indirect impacts from the http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/category/6490068894089216 Proposed Scheme.

Should the ES identify that the proposal is likely to have a significant effect on internationally designated sites then assessment under the No direct or indirect impacts to Habitats Regulations will be required. In such cases, we recommend Natura 2000 European / international) or SSSIs are predicted

3 Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater and Coastal. 2nd Edition. Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management, January 2016.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

that there should be a separate section of the ES to address impacts from the Proposed Scheme. upon European and Ramsar sites entitled ‘Information for Habitats Regulations Assessment’ No significant effect on a European/

internationally designated site is Natural England is pleased that the Scoping Report identifies the need predicted from the Proposed Scheme to consider any impacts upon local wildlife and geological sites. The ES and hence the ES does not need to should therefore include an assessment of the likely impacts on the contain a section entitled ‘Information wildlife and geodiversity interests of such sites. The assessment should for Habitats Regulations include proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, Assessment’. compensation measures. The applicant should contact the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Wildlife Trust for further information. Records of protected species have Records of protected species should be sought from appropriate local been obtained from the biological record centres, nature conservation organisations, groups Cambridgeshire and Peterborough and individuals; and consideration should be given to the wider context Environmental Records Centre of the site for example in terms of habitat linkages and protected (CPERC) and various specialist species populations in the wider area, to assist in the impact recording groups. This baseline assessment. information was used to determine important habitat linkages and The area likely to be affected by the proposal should be thoroughly locations of protected species surveyed by competent ecologists at appropriate times of year for populations in the wider area, to relevant species and the survey results, impact assessments and assist in this assessment. appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of the ES. Competent and suitably experienced ecologists undertook the surveys to Natural England is pleased that the Scoping Report proposes to inform this assessment at appropriate thoroughly assess the impact of the proposals on habitats and/or times of year and during optimal species listed as ‘Habitats and Species of Principal Importance’ within weather conditions. The survey the England Biodiversity List. Consideration should also be given to results and mitigation measures for those species and habitats included in the relevant Local BAP. the Proposed Scheme are included in this assessment. Natural England advises that a habitat survey (equivalent to Phase 2) is carried out on the site, in order to identify any important habitats present. In addition, ornithological, botanical and invertebrate surveys The assessment considers impacts should be carried out at appropriate times in the year, to establish to habitats and species of principal

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

whether any scarce or priority species are present. importance and also those included on the Cambridgeshire & We recommend that you seek further information from the appropriate Peterborough Local Biodiversity bodies including CPERC, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Wildlife Action Plan (LBAP). Addressed in ES Trust, local geoconservation group and a local landscape Chapter 9 ‘Biodiversity’. characterisation document

A habitat mapping and scoping survey was undertaken in April 2016 to inform what ecological surveys were required to inform this assessment. Ornithological, botanical and invertebrate surveys were carried out at appropriate times in the year, to establish whether any scarce or priority species are present.

Ecological data was obtained from CPERC; Cambridgeshire Bat Group; and, Cambridgeshire Mammal Group. See Chapters 10 and 12 respectively for information about local geoconservation and landscape characterisation.

5 Environment - The Wildlife Trust Please refer to ES Chapter 9 Biodiversity ‘Biodiversity’ - Enhancement Seeking assurance the proposals will have a net gain in biodiversity for paragraph 673 (net gain stated) and Brook Drain CWS. Appendix H.

6 Relocation of CBRE on behalf of Lloyds Banking Group High Voltage Power Cables Lloyds Banking Group wants further information concerning the likely Network Rail can confirm that the relocation of 33KV overhead lines, closer to the data centre. There is 33KV overhead lines will not be concern about possible increases in EMF levels. relocated as part of the Proposed

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Scheme. 7 Loss of Strategic CBRE on behalf of Lloyds Banking Group Expansion Capability Lloyds Banking Group own 16.5 acres of land and a data centre See point 1 above regarding noise immediately adjoining the land. Lloyds Banking Group is concerned and vibration impacts from the about how the scheme will impact the operation of the data centre, Proposed Scheme. which would be a significant cost to relocate, and potential for strategic expansion in the future. At the time of submitting the application to the Secretary of State for Transport, there is no planning permission relating to future expansion of the data centre.

8 Demolition of Local Landowner Network Rail has assessed Property alternatives to the proposed design Property will be demolished. The local landowner was hoping the dive but unfortunately it was not possible under could take place somewhere before the property, in the fields. to avoid the three properties.

Compensation is available after a Transport and Works Act Order, which provides an acquiring authority with compensation powers. In the event that Network Rail obtains powers, it will compensate according to the statutory compensation code. 9 Impact on cyclists Local Landowner and pedestrians The character of Hurn Road may be affected by the dive under, which Please refer to the ES Chapter 12 is used by cyclists and pedestrians. ‘Biodiversity’, Chapter 15 ‘Traffic & Transport’, Appendix K and Appendix M.

Network Rail has undertaken a dedicated consultation session for residents of Hurn Road prior to the

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

main consultation events and has designed the scheme to reflect the existing usage of the area.

Access for cyclists, pedestrians and equestrian users shall be maintained adjacent to the new railway under A15 Hurn Road bridge span; with safe separation from the new operational infrastructure.

A multi-purpose bridge across the A15 and Hurn Road will be provided for utilities, pedestrians, cyclists and equestrians to maintain access between Lincoln Road, Hurn Road and the A15.

10 Contaminated Environment Agency Please refer to ES Main Statement: Land Chapter 10: Contaminated Land, Not satisfied with the Scoping Report as a basis for the EIA. The Waste and Resources: Section Helpston Groundwater Remediation Project lies 3km to the west and 10.6.1.2: Ground and Surface Water contaminants still continue to rise at the borehole. Care needs to be Contamination, paragraphs 792-794. taken to ensure cross contamination of other aquifers does not result. Data from the Environment Agency monitoring well has been included in the assessment. The Environment Agency monitoring borehole shall be decommissioned prior to the construction of the dive under and in consultation with the Environment Agency. Decommissioning shall be carried out in accordance with the Environment Agency’s ‘Good Practice for Decommissioning

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Redundant Boreholes and Wells’. 11 No Objections National Grid, Natural England, Vodafone, UK Power Networks Noted. No response required. The following organisations raised no objections.

12 Potential for Glinton Parish Council Network Rail has attended a Parish additional Council meeting and presented the consultation event Desire for a consultation event to be held in Glinton also and be proposed scheme. locations included on the agenda at parish council meeting. 13 Mitigation of Peterborough-Ely-Norwich-Rail Users Planning of disruptive rail access is potential rail an integral part of the project’s disruption Supports scheme in principle. Seeking assurance signalling doesn’t strategy. Network Rail’s early delay passenger trains and that services for students and migrant contractor engagement strategy workers on Sundays are not severely disrupted during construction. seeks to outline proposed access two Closures should be concentrated on a Bank Holiday weekends and years in advance of disruption and university vacations. identify innovative construction methods to safely construct the scheme whilst minimising disruption.

Access will be negotiating with train and freight companies with a working group looking at wider engineering works across Network Rail; due consideration will be given to seasonal constraints.

A Network Change notice will be presented to train and freight operating companies to present the changes to the signalling scheme.

14 Considers Historic England

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

scoping report ES Main Statement: Chapter 8: appropriate Approach to EIA is adequate for mitigation of heritage assets Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.

15 Alternative GreenNet Location Support the scheme in principle, but grade separation should occur at Please refer to ES Main Statement: an alternative location, just north of Peterborough Station. This would Chapter 3: Alternatives. be cheaper, simpler and all on railway land, thus avoiding CPOs.

16 Considers Welland and Deepings Internal Drainage Board scoping report appropriate No objections to the EIA scoping report. Noted. No response required. 17 Environment Peterborough City Council Please refer to ES Main Statement: Landscape and The Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment should provide Chapter 12: Landscape and Visual: Visual sufficient information to enable the visual impacts during construction Section 12.6.1: Avoidance and and operation of the scheme to be understood, including if appropriate mitigation measures by use of photomontages Full technical detail in ES Volume III: The Scoping Opinion makes no reference to consideration of the Appendix K: Landscape and Visual. proposal upon existing trees within the site area. The Council’s Tree Officer has advised that immediately to the east of the site/railway track Network Rail has provided a tree are trees subject to Tree Preservation Order 37/1989. These trees are survey in ES Volume III: Appendix part of a woodland order that are adjacent to the track for around 1km. K2. This is in accordance with Due to the potential for heavy plant, storage and access to BS5837:2012 and assesses the unintentionally damage otherwise retained trees, clarification on the impacts on existing trees within the impacts are requested. It is noted that spoil storage may be required site area and details planned therefore adequate standoffs from trees will be necessary due to the mitigation within the CoCP. potential of soil compaction. 18 Environment DfT Scoping Response

Water Resource The assessment should also include impacts on the Folly River water ES Volume III: Technical body (WFD ID: GB105031050560). The assessment should include Appendices: Appendix N: Water

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

how the proposed development would affect measures in the River Resources: Document N2: Flood Basin Management Plan to achieve good status in water bodies. Risk Assessment (FRA): specifically Sections 3,3, Table 3.1, Table 4.3 and Table 4.4. 19 Archaeology Peterborough City Council

The proposed methodology places emphasis on a staged approach. Please refer to the ES Main On this basis, I would recommend that a programme of assessment Statement: Chapter 8 Archaeology and evaluation is carried out pre-determination. The programme should and Cultural Heritage: specifically include the following (in sequential order): Section 8.5: Assessment of Effects * Desk-based assessment and Section 8.6: Mitigation and * Aerial photographic (re)-appraisal Residual Effects. * Geophysical survey * Trial trenching * Targeted area excavation

All phases of work should include a Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) to be submitted to, and approved by, the Local Planning Authority. Relevant conditions should be discharged in phases, following completion of the relevant part of work. Full discharge should follow the submission of the relevant report(s) and publication(s) (format to be agreed), as well as a statement confirming the deposition of the generated archives (repository to be agreed, if not Peterborough Museum). 20 Environment Natural England

Agriculture & Natural England welcomes proposals to consider impacts on best and ES Main Statement: Chapter 6: Soils most versatile (BMV) agricultural land as set out in paragraph 112 of Agricultural Land: specifically Section the NPPF. Consideration should also be given to the sustainable use of 6.5: Assessment of Effects and land and the ecosystem services soils provide as a natural resource, in Section 6.6: Mitigation and Residual line with paragraph 109 of the NPPF. Effects.

The applicant should consider the degree to which soils are going to be disturbed/harmed as part of this development and whether ‘best and most versatile’ agricultural land is involved. This may require a detailed

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

survey if one is not already available.

If required, an agricultural land classification and soil survey of the land should be undertaken. This should normally be at a detailed level, e.g. one auger boring per hectare, (or more detailed for a small site) supported by pits dug in each main soil type to confirm the physical characteristics of the full depth of the soil resource, i.e. 1.2 metres.

The ES should provide details of how any adverse impacts on soils can be minimised.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

[page intentionally blank]

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

APPENDIX 5b – STAGE 2 (2016) WERRINGTON PRE APPLICATION COMMUNITY CONSULTATION

Number of Issue Summary of key points consultees Network Rail's position and where Number Key/headline Issue raised who raised applicable, where further information is issue available 1 Scheme delivery  How will it be ensured 10 Network Rail has worked with industry stakeholders that the project to develop plans to deliver projects to improve remains on schedule? capacity and reduce journey times on the ECML.  Generally supportive - The provision of a new junction at Werrington to why is there an 18 separate high speed and freight traffic was identified month delay for the as one of the key enablers in providing additional Secretary of State’s ECML capacity, thus allowing the introduction of decision? additional LDHS Paths available for the new timetable to be introduced in 2021.The project is funded in Network Rail’s Delivery Plan for the ECML.

If after submitted the application the Secretary of State calls for a public inquiry, there is a process which must be followed under The Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure)(England and Wales) Rules 2006.

2 Informing Residents  How will residents be 5 Network Rail agreed with the local authority an - Further information kept informed? Approach to Community Consultation and a robust required  How will residents programme of consultation was carried out. Once continued to be the TWAO application is submitted, all documents empowered? will be available to view and download.  Will there be a liaison contact? As part of the CoCP,an External Communications Programme will be approved by the local authority.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

This document will explain how Network Rail and its contractors will liaise with the local community and businesses throughout the construction period.

Interim updates shall be via www.networkrail.co.uk/werrington.

3a. Noise/Vibration Will construction work occur at 6 Impacts - appropriate times e.g. Working Hours Construction noise minimise impact at night and Please refer to ES Main Statement: Chapter 4: impacts will they be adequately ‘Proposed Scheme: Section 4.3.3: Working Hours’ informed of this? Night Works, Please refer to ES Main Statement: Chapter 13: Noise and Vibration: Section 13.4.1: Construction and Appendix L.

Minimising noise impacts Please refer to ES Main Statement: Chapter 13: Section 13.4.1.1: Embedded Mitigation 3b Noise/Vibration Noise impacts unbearable 1 Impacts - already, forced to sell Please refer to Main Statement: ES Chapter 13: Impact of existing house. Noise and Vibration: Section 13.5.2: Operational freight trains Phase and Section 13.9: Conclusions.

3c Noise/Vibration  Will there be barriers 17 Impacts - between Whitley Barriers and noise mitigation on track Operational homes and the Refer to ES Main Statement Chapter 13 Noise and Impacts/ Mitigation railway? Vibration: Section 13.6.1.2: Operational noise and  Noise mitigation on vibration from trains existing track, not just new section. Sound proofing in general, fences and trees  Will there be sound None required, refer to MS Main Statement: Chapter proofing for Davids 13: Noise and Vibration: Section 13.6.1.2: Close and Gascoigne Operational noise and vibration from trains

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

Housing?  What type of trees will be used as sound Network Rail has noted the concerns of equestrian mitigation e.g maple? users at Hurn Road and proposes to install  Will there be a fence appropriate screening on the route which continues between Sergeant through A15 Hurn Road span. The agreed solution Way & Railway Drive? will be consulted with the British Horse Society,  Will there be noise whom Network Rail have consulted on site and mitigation measures to taken advice in the initial design phase. allow horses to pass safely, especially under the bridge? 4a Impacts on the  How will effect on the 4 Please refer to ES Main Statement Chapter 9: Environment - environment and Biodiversity: Section 9.6: Mitigation and Residual Ecology wildlife be minimised? Effects and Section 9.9: ecological Enhancement. There are red kites and sparrow hawks in For full technical,detail, refer to ES Volume III: the area Technical Appendices:Appendix H: Biodiversity.  What measures will be taken to preserve as much flora as possible and minimise landscape damage?  Will wild flowers and wildlife hedging be planted? These must be wildlife friendly and have intermittent holes (e.g 15m spacing) allowing small mammals to pass through

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

4b Impacts on the  What measures will be 3 Network Rail is grateful this has been pointed out in Environment - taken to ensure the consultation. It is not anticipated as part of the Landscape & Public John Clare mural will scheme this shall be removed. De-vegetation Realm not be affected? What required allowing proximate construction works innovative method can should make the John Clare mural more visible achieve this? following completion of the scheme.

3. 5 Safety concerns  How will safer 7 Please refer to ES Main Statement: Chapter 15: (SAF) approaches to the Traffic and Transport: Section 15.6: Mitigation and bridge be promoted? Residual Effects (commitment to a Traffic  When construction Management Plan as part of the CoCP). commences, how will the safety of children travelling to school, both walking and cycling be guaranteed?  How has the safety of children travelling to AMVC school been considered, both walking/cycling?

6a Access - Rail Is there any potential for a 1 new train stop to serve the There are no plans at present to provide a station at Werrington Werrington. Community?

6b Access - Pedestrian  Will all pedestrian 11 Access during construction movement crossings over the ES Main Statement: Chapter 15: Traffic and railways be maintained Transport: Section 15.5.1.2: Non-Motorised Users throughout the (all access maintained). scheme?  What measures will be Access when operational taken to ensure ES Main Statement: Chapter 15: Traffic and

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

pedestrian and cycle Transport: Section 15.5.2.2: Non-Motorised Users paths are being (slight changes in access but all maintained retained?  Are there any plans to The bridge at Wedgewood Way/Marholm Road redesign the concrete Is not affected by the scheme and shall not be re- spiralling footbridge designed. that links Wedgwood Way and Marholm Road?

6c Access - Equestrian  Will the bridleway from 4 The Hurn Road diversion route along Gasworks Waterworks Lane to Road will be a 3.7m wide single lane road with 15m Hurn Road be of 5.7m wide (total road width) passing bays. Low retained? traffic volumes are anticipated as the route will  A bridleway along Fox mainly act as an access for four dwellings located Covert Road from towards the end of the existing Hurn Road. The Werrington towards existing hedge-segregated footway and bridleway Glinton is inadequate along Gasworks Road will be retained adjacent to for my use - this was a the diversion. regular horse riding route but is now only It is not proposed that the scheme will impact on the foot and cycle access. Werrington to Glinton route.  Will bridleway surface material be suitable? Network Rail has consulted with the British Horse i.e not concrete Society on suitable surfaces for bridleways and shall  Will there be a warning duly adapt the design to provide an appropriate light system that equestrian surface. enables safe decision- making from all A full and detailed hazard assessment shall be approaches to the conducted to ensure the identified hazard between bridge (over or under) equestrian users and other traffic is appropriately such that there is managed. This shall consider, but not be limited to, sufficient time to dismounting blocks, signage, warning lights and proceed safely? fencing.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

7 Any other  Will dust levels be 1 Concerns monitored? Please refer to ES Main Statement: Chapter 7: Air Quality: Section 7.6.1: Demolition and Construction Phase, and included in the Code of Construction Practice (CoCP), consented as Part B Nuisance Management Plan.

Land  Regarding the 1 Any concerns and questions regarding land use and ‘pockets’ of land planning should be raised with PCC as local adjacent to the ECML, planning authority. will PCC be consulted to discuss the best use for them? Devaluation of  Will financial 6 Residential compensation be 4. No operational noise effects by assessment. properties & provided to install triple 5. ES Main Statement: Chapter 13: Noise and compensation glazing to minimise Vibration: Section 13.6.1.2: Operational Phase noise impact from scheme? 6. Future assessment for potential noise insulation in  Will decreasing house compliance with Noise Insulation (Railway and prices of local Other Guided Transport Systems) Regulations. resident’s properties be taken into account? 7. ES Main Statement: Chapter 13: Noise and  If there is any vibration Vibration: Section 13.4.1: Construction (paragraph damage caused to 1044). infrastructure of properties will they be 8. Vibration Effects during construction fully compensated? 9. ES Main Statement: Chapter 13: Noise and Vibration: Section 13.5.1 Construction: Construction vibration – direct effects at residential receptors (paragraph 1070).

Comments on  Consultation process 4 Network Rail agreed with the local authority an Consultation very good approach to community consultation and a robust process programme of consultation was carried out.

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

 The consultation process was lacking in detail

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

[page intentionally blank]

The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order December 2016 Report Summarising Consultation Undertaken

APPENDIX 6 – WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION CONSULTATION MATERIAL

- Exhibition panels - Information leaflets - Feedback forms - Newspaper adverts - Letters - Aerial plan - Poster - Press release - Flyers

APPENDIX 6 – WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION CONSULTATION MATERIAL

Stage 1: Two engineering options

Promotional newspaper advert Promotional flyer

Consultation leaflet

Image of consultation exhibition panels

Stage 1b: First round consultation – update

Update fact sheet

Update letter Stage 2: Pre-application consultation: Single preferred option

Letter of invitation

Poster and newspaper advert Consultation Proposed Scheme plan Consultation leaflet

Consultation exhibition panels 1-4

Consultation exhibition panels 5-9 Stage 2b: Information round – Helpston APSP

Helpston APSP notification letter

Helpston APSP notification – enclosed plan