DOCSLIB.ORG

September 2016 (Updated January 2018)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
September 2016 (Updated January 2018) North Herts District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan to support the North Hertfordshire Local Plan 2011 - 2031 September 2016 (Updated January 2018) Prepared by Rob Shipway. RS Regeneration, on behalf of North Herts District Council 2 Explanation on the January 2018 IDP Update This document was originally prepared in September 2016. In the 16 months since publication a number of things have changed, and in the summer of 2017, in the lead up to the Local Plan examination, the decision was made to undertake a partial refresh to enable a number of new points of evidence to be considered, in particuar: The reduction in housing growth figures (as they now appear in the submission version of the Local Plan and the subject of examination) compared to those assessed in the original IDP (which are some 4.4% higher) New evidence (including the October 2017 Transport Strategy and the 2016 Open Space Review and Standards) New funding opportunities that have emerged since 2016 (including annoucements nthe 2017 Spring and Autumn budgets) A clearer assessment of how the infrastructure that is required could be funded Specific evidence (including viability work) on the infrastructure needs associated with the 6 largest strategic sites Other minor textual changes to provide a clearer explanation or correct factual errors Text boxes at the start of each chapter provide a summary of the changes within that chapter The Update does not alter the conclusions of the original document, but provides further evidence to support those conclusions 3 Table of Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 6 2. Profile of North Hertfordshire ........................................................................ 11 3. Context and approach .................................................................................... 14 4. The Local Plan Growth Strategy ...................................................................... 24 5. Transport ......................................................................................................... 39 6. Education including extended schools ........................................................ 73 7. Healthcare ....................................................................................................... 94 8. Social Infrastructure ..................................................................................... 111 9. Emergency Services ..................................................................................... 126 10. Green Infrastructure ..................................................................................... 131 11. Waste and Recycling .................................................................................... 140 12. Utilities ........................................................................................................... 144 13. Infrastructure Funding & Delivery ............................................................... 159 Appendix 1 - Infrastructure Delivery Schedule ...... AError! Bookmark not defined. 4 Foreword This Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) as a document seeks to identify all relevant infrastructure needs that are anticipated over the whole plan period from this point starting forward and which can clearly be related to growth, so that there is clear evidence that such need is both known and actively being planned for. The content of this IDP is based on the potential implications of infrastructure need arising from meeting the district’s growth needs to 2031 together with any relevant development taking place in adjoining districts that might have significant infrastructure implications for North Hertfordshire. This report has been prepared on the basis that the development of circa 14,400 new dwellings is achieved over the plan period1. The infrastructure needs set out in chapters 5 to 12 and the projects set out in the Infrastructure Delivery Schedule in Appendix 1 are based on this figure. Identifying infrastructure need over a period of 15 years can be complex. Few infrastructure providers are actively planning over so lengthy a timeframe and for that reason alone, the identification of needs in the later years of the plan period include a degree of conjecture. The precise nature of what is needed in a range of services – is likely to be in a constant state of flux. This is influenced by a range of factors such as changes in demographics and movements into and out of local communities, the power and influence of new technology and new arrangements for planning and delivering structure not withstanding community’s expectations of what they need to be provided with – is also constantly shifting. To the mix must be added the historic infrastructure that has been identified but never provided – otherwise known as the infrastructure deficit. IDPs are rightly focused on what infrastructure is needed to make the emerging plan work and cannot expect to right past wrongs in terms of historic failures to provide what has been judged as necessary. However, the impact of already congested roads, underinvestment in health facilities and oversubscribed schools, for instance, cannot and must not be ignored. This IDP aims to achieve a presentation of a balanced, well considered view of future needs related to Plan activities and how they can be carefully planned, adequately funded and delivered in a timely fashion. The additional benefit arising out of such a document is that it allows all those with an interest in infrastructure provision to take stock and plan successful strategies to ensure that these needs become a reality. 1 The emerging strategy tested through this IDP was defined in advance of final decisions being taken on the sites and targets included in the draft Local Plan. 5 1. Introduction 1.1 The National Planning Policy Framework states that the planning system should “pro- actively drive and support sustainable economic development to deliver homes, business and industrial units, infrastructure and thriving local places that the country needs.” 1.2 Over the plan period from 2011 - 2031 North Herts district is, and will continue to be, the focus of substantial housing and employment growth, which will result in increased pressure on local infrastructure, services and facilities. Given this, it is crucial that new infrastructure is provided to support the delivery of new homes and jobs, and create sustainable and inclusive communities. Purpose of the IDP 1.3 The purpose of any IDP is to identify the infrastructure requirements arising out of an authority's Local Plan over the entire plan period, considering also the cost, timing, potential funding mechanisms and responsibilities for delivery. Those requirements will tend to be focused on the needs associated with housing growth, but also need to take into account the implications of other site allocations (particularly employment site requirements) and other local plan policies. 1.4 Infrastructure planning is a key part of the local plan in helping to demonstrate how its policies and site allocations can be delivered. Whilst it will not be necessary to provide a complete answer to all questions relating to this issue, it does allow the key challenges to be defined and the opportunities to be considered. 1.5 This process of defining infrastructure needs involves the local planning authority working closely with infrastructure providers to determine requirements over time. Such engagement is an important process as it will: enable infrastructure providers to give proper consideration on the scale, nature and location of growth, information which they can then factor into other elements of their service planning work; encourage such providers to think beyond the relatively short term and also less parochially and more holistically (to see their infrastructure planning work in a wider context); alert them as to the available public funding opportunities (such as section 106 and the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)) and the opportunities that will exist to secure access to it. 1.6 The Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) seeks to establish what additional infrastructure is required to support growth within the district from March 2016 to 2031. [As noted elsewhere in the document, the IDP is concerned with infrastructure needs going forward, not historic need associated with growth that has already taken place, so whilst the Local Plan covers the period 2011- 2031, a base date of March 6 31st 2016 has been selected; this document examines infrastructure need arising from development from that date until the end of the plan period – 2031] 1.7 The IDP aims to: Review existing infrastructure provision in the district and identify gaps in provision; Set out what infrastructure is required to support growth, where the infrastructure is needed and when it should be delivered; Detail the costs associated with the provision of infrastructure items in the district, identify potential funding sources, and highlight gaps in funding, where known; Identify mechanisms for delivering infrastructure and outline the key stakeholders involved in the delivery process. 1.8 A schedule of infrastructure projects required to support the delivery of the Council's Local Plan can be found in Appendix 1. What the IDP represents 1.9 It is important to set out precisely what
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia
    Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Contents Foreword 3 Looking Ahead 5 Priorities in Detail • Great Eastern Main Line 6 • West Anglia Main Line 6 • Great Northern Route 7 • Essex Thameside 8 • Branch Lines 8 • Freight 9 A five county alliance • Norfolk 10 • Suffolk 11 • Essex 11 • Cambridgeshire 12 • Hertfordshire 13 • Connecting East Anglia 14 Our counties connected 15 Foreword Our vision is to release the industry, entrepreneurship and talent investment in rail connectivity and the introduction of the Essex of our region through a modern, customer-focused and efficient Thameside service has transformed ‘the misery line’ into the most railway system. reliable in the country, where passenger numbers have increased by 26% between 2005 and 2011. With focussed infrastructure We have the skills and enterprise to be an Eastern Economic and rolling stock investment to develop a high-quality service, Powerhouse. Our growing economy is built on the successes of East Anglia can deliver so much more. innovative and dynamic businesses, education institutions that are world-leading and internationally connected airports and We want to create a rail network that sets the standard for container ports. what others can achieve elsewhere. We want to attract new businesses, draw in millions of visitors and make the case for The railways are integral to our region’s economy - carrying more investment. To do this we need a modern, customer- almost 160 million passengers during 2012-2013, an increase focused and efficient railway system. This prospectus sets out of 4% on the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Admissions Policy 2021-22 (September 2021 Entry)
    Admissions Policy 2021-22 (September 2021 entry) Author: Mr R Newman Responsible Committee: Full Governing Body Ambition · Pride · Success Haileybury Turnford School Admission Arrangements for 2021-22 The school will have a published admission number of 182 Section 324 of the Education Act 1996 requires the governing bodies of all maintained schools to admit a child with an Education Health & Care Plan (EHCP) that names the school. If there are fewer applications than places available, all applicants will be offered a place. If there are more applications than places available, the criteria outlined below will be used to allocate applications. Rule 1 Looked After Children Children looked after and children who were previously looked after, but ceased to be so because they were adopted (or became subject to a child’s arrangements order or a special guardianship order). Rule 2 Medical or Social Children for whom it can be demonstrated that they have a particular medical or social need to go to the school, which includes children previously abroad who were cared for by the state because he or she would not otherwise have been cared for adequately and subsequently adopted. A panel of HCC officers will determine whether the evidence provided is sufficiently compelling to meet the requirements for this rule. The evidence must relate specifically to the school applied for under Rule 2 and must clearly demonstrate why it is the only school that can meet the child’s needs. Rule 3 Sibling Children who have a sibling at the school at the time of application, unless the sibling is in the last year of the normal age-range of the school.
    [Show full text]
  • Admission Rules for Community and Voluntary-Controlled Co-Educational
    The Highfield School Admission arrangements for 2020/21 The school will have a published admission number of 180 Section 324 of the Education Act 1996 requires the governing bodies of all maintained schools to admit a child with a statement of special educational needs that names their school. All schools must also admit children with an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) that names the school. Rule 1 Children looked after and children who were previously looked after, but ceased to be so because they were adopted (or became subject to a child arrangement order or a special guardianship order). Rule 2 Medical or Social: Children for whom it can be demonstrated that they have a particular medical or social need to go to the school. A panel of HCC officers will determine whether the evidence provided is sufficiently compelling to meet the requirements for this rule. The evidence must relate specifically to the school applied for under Rule 2 and must clearly demonstrate why it is the only school that can meet the child’s needs. Rule 3 Sibling: Children who have a sibling at the school at the time of application, unless the sibling is in the last year of the normal age-range of the school. Note: the ‘normal age range’ is the designated range for which the school provides, for example Years 7 to 11 in a 11-16 secondary school, Years 7 to 13 in a 11-18 school. Rule 4 Children for whom The Highfield School is their nearest school. Rule 5 Children who live in the priority area for whom it is their nearest Hertfordshire maintained school or academy that is non-faith, co-educational and non-partially selective.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet
    FFerr A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report March 2016 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Project no: B2074900 Document title: Option Assessment Report Document No.: B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 Revision: 0 Date: 17 March 2016 Client name: Highways England Client no: Project manager: Simon Beaney Author: Robert Benson Jacobs U.K. Limited 1180 Eskdale Road Winnersh, Wokingham Reading RG41 5TU United Kingdom T +44 (0)118 946 7000 F +44 (0)118 946 7001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2016 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 29/01/2016 Draft for client review RB SM/DW SB 1 17/03/2016 Final RB TB SB B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 i A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of report ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Overview of assessment ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Railfuture Oxford to Cambridge (East West Rail)
    9th September 2013 Railfuture Oxford to Cambridge (East West Rail) campaign Briefing note on route options for the Central Section from Bedford to Cambridge Introduction The government and the Office of Rail Regulation have approved the upgrading and rebuilding of the railway between Oxford and Bedford, the Western Section of East West Rail. Railfuture is a long-term campaigner for the completion of the East West Rail project to Cambridge and into East Anglia. The Eastern Section of the route is already in use from Norwich and Ely to Cambridge via the soon to be opened Cambridge Science Park station; from Ipswich via Bury St Edmunds and Newmarket to Cambridge; and from Stansted Airport to Cambridge. Map 1: The East West Rail Link Between Bedford and Cambridge some of the original route is lost to development and population growth in the region has occurred away from the original stations. The question of corridor and route selection is therefore a key factor in making the case for the Bedford to Cambridge (Central) section of East West Rail. Railfuture is assessing the candidate corridors that have been identified by the East West Rail (EWR) Consortium. An early conclusion is that routes for possible approaches to the two nodes, Bedford and Cambridge, should be agreed and protected at an early stage, such is the pace of growth and development. Page 1 of 10 9th September 2013 Purpose The purpose of this document is to set out the options for EWR route options for the approach to Cambridge from the west. The options for Bedford will be covered by another document.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog 210: Photographic Viewbooks
    R & A PETRILLA, BOOKSELLERS P.O. Box 306 Roosevelt, NJ 08555 Catalog 210: Photographic Viewbooks 1. Alabama-Georgia-Carolinas-Florida. SINGER SOUVENIR OF THE SOUTH: Set of Ten Photographic Views. s.l.: Singer Sewing Machine Co., ca 1900. First Edition. Comprises 10 photographic views (11cm x 18cm) of Southern cities and scenes, each with a full-page Singer ad on the verso. Views include: Court Square, Montgomery, Ala.; Selling Cotton, Newman, Ga.; Scene on the French Broad River, NC; Pringle House, Charleston, SC; Silver Spring, Head of Ocklawaha River, Florida; &c. In the original illustrated envelope, edges split but intact. Views in fine condition. 4.75" x 7.5" Very Good. Portfolio. (#036829) $90.00 [Not recorded by WorldCat, which does find one holding of a set of 10 views of Boston, issued by Singer Co.] 2. Alaska, Yukon Territory. A HAND BOOK OF VACATION TRIPS IN ALASKA AND THE YUKON ON THE WHITE PASS AND YUKON ROUTE (via the Steamer "Whitehorse") . Seattle: Farwest, 1940. First Edition. 56pp; illustrated from photographs and strip maps. This guide offers various Yukon tours, including: The Trail of '98 to the Klondike Gold Fields; West Taku Arm; Whitehorse and the Yukon River; Miles Canyon and Whitehorse Rapids; The Yukon River to Dawson; Dawson to Whitehorse: &c. The description of each tour includes a brief history of places along the route, a strip map, and views from photographs (several full-page). The original owner made three neat, marginal notes regarding costs. Pictorial wrappers. 3.5" x 6" Fine. Pictorial Paper Covers. (#037142) $50.00 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Times 12 December 2010 to 21 May 2011
    Train Times 12 December 2010 to 21 May 2011 Great Northern Route London 6,500 Welwyn Garden City re Hertford North mo Stevenage seats! Peterborough See page 116 for details Cambridge King’s Lynn CI.GNA.1210 thameslinkprogramme.co.uk visit information, more – 16January 2011.For 20November Blackfriars willbeclosed from London (2230 –0430)andmostweekends. evenings Friday Herne to HillonMonday late Bridge / InternationalandLondon Pancras St / Town noservices are Kentish between There London Connections Maida Vale ST. PANCRAS St John’s KING’S RAIL SERVICES Warwick INTERNATIONAL Essex Road Zone MARYLEBONE Wood EUSTON CROSS Hoxton NATIONAL RAIL SERVICES Avenue Great Angel 2 First Capital Connect Royal Oak Portland Street Chiltern Railways Cambridge c2c Old Street Heath Baker King’s Cross FARRINGDON First Great Western Regents Euston Square Shoreditch Street St Pancras High Street London Midland Edgware Park Warren Street Barbican London Overground PADDINGTON Road Russell MOORGATE Bethnal Bayswater Goodge Square National Express Street Green East Anglia Holland Lancaster Bond LIVERPOOL Southern Notting Tottenham Park Gate Street Court Road Holborn STREET Southeastern Hill Gate Chancery Lane Zone South West Trains Shepherd’s Queensway Marble Oxford Heathrow Connect Bush Circus Arch Covent St Paul’s 1 Heathrow Express Zone 1 Garden Whitechapel Green Piccadilly Leicester Aldgate TfL SERVICES Kensington High Street Hyde Park Circus Bank Kensington Park Square City (thinner lines) Olympia Corner Thameslink FENCHURCH Aldgate Bakerloo Line East Knightsbridge Underground station STREET Central Line CHARING closed until late 2011 CANNON Circle Line South CROSS BLACKFRIARS Bank District Line Kensington Sloane STREET Shadwell Docklands Square Westminster Light Railway Mansion Monument Tower Tower Temple Hill Hammersmith & Earls Gloucester VICTORIA St.
    [Show full text]
  • ED142 : NHDC Final Response to Inspector's Actions Arising out of The
    ED142 : NHDC Final response to Inspector’s Actions arising out of the Hearing Sessions Matter 6 – Deliverability Action Date on which Examination Doc Action Completed Reference No. • NHDC to provide updated version of Table A of Matter Enclosed as ED142 Appendix M6-1 6 Hearing Statement (to include infrastructure for other allocated sites (i.e. not housing sites)) and the Housing Trajectory • NHDC to provide updated Infrastructure Delivery Plan 23/01/ 2018 ED73 • Infrastructure Delivery Plan Appendix A 23/02/2018 ED73a Enclosed As Appendix M6-2 • Hertfordshire County Council to provide suggested 21/02/2018 ED105 Enclosed as additional/amended wording in the Plan regarding Appendix M6-3 transport issues for consideration by NHDC MM028, MM031, MM032 and MM033. • NHDC to liaise with Stevenage Borough Council with Enclosed as ED142 Appendix M6-4 regard to additional/amended wording • NHDC to provide note clarifying transport position 08/02/2018 ED86 Enclosed as with regard to B656 between Codicote and Appendix M6-5 Knebworth as raised by Mr Bamber of Save Rural Codicote • NHDC to provide note clarifying whether or not 08/02/2018 ED85 Enclosed as transport modelling shows that there is a need for a Appendix M6-6 southern bypass for Hitchin during the Plan period Appendix M6 – 1 ED142 : Note on Matter 6 / Table A – Infrastructure provision NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN EXAMINATION ED142: MATTER 6 Note to Inspector Matter 6 / Table A – Infrastructure provision 1. Following the hearing sessions for Matter 6 (Deliverability), the following action has been specified: • NHDC to provide updated version of Table A of Matter 6 Hearing Statement (to included infrastructure for other allocated sites (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hitchin (Cambridge Junction)) Order
    NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 THE NETWORK RAIL (HITCHIN (CAMBRIDGE JUNCTION)) ORDER TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990: REQUEST FOR DEEMED PLANNING PERMISSION TRANSPORT AND WORKS (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) RULES 2004 DfT Ref: TWA/09/APP/05 CLOSING SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED INTRODUCTION 1. These closing submissions follow the format of the SS Statement of Matters. Before embarking on the exercise, however, it is worth reviewing the position now reached with respect to the objections which made the inquiry necessary. 2. All the landowners (freeholders and those with rights in land) whose interests would be compulsorily acquired under the Order have either withdrawn their objections or are imminently expected to (NHDC, EDF, AWA, NG, Prime Estates, the farm interests etc.); or have not appeared to pursue them (SITA) content, presumably, to rely on their rights under the Compensation Code. AWA are now satisfied that their interests can be secured by the Schedule 12 protective provisions; as are the other statutory utility providers EDF and NG. 3. The objections of the statutory authorities have also been withdrawn. Natural England (who did not object) are content that ecological interests affected by the Order Works, particularly in the Burymead Springs area, can be adequately conserved and protected by conditions (DM Appendix th 7: Minutes of the 11 March 2010 Area Planning Officer’s advice to Committee). The Environment Agency have withdrawn their objection having reached common ground with NR on the protective provisions in Schedule 13 (EA email th 6 May and ‘Statement of Common Ground’).
    [Show full text]
  • Martin G Hoffman ASHWELL Mark Noble Westbrook
    ABCDEFGHIJ Any employment, office, Any payment or A description of any Any land in the Council’s Any land in the Council’s Any tenancy where to The name of any person Any other types of interest (other 1 Councillor Parish trade, profession or provision of any other contract for goods, area in which you have area for which you or the your knowledge the or body in which you than Disclosable Pecuniary Spire Furlong 3 Newnham Way Trustee - Ashwell Village Hall Ashwell Trustee - Ashwell Village Museum 2 Martin G Hoffman ASHWELL Retired NONE NONE Herts NONE NONE NONE Vide President - Ashwell Show 33 West End Mark Noble Ashwell 3 Westbrook - White ASHWELL Ambit Projects Limited NONE NONE Herts SG7 5PM NONE NONE NONE 41 Club 3 Orchard View Sunnymead 4 Bridget Macey ASHWELL NONE NONE NONE Ashwell NONE NONE NONE NONE 92 Station Road Ashwell 5 David R Sims ASHWELL NONE NONE NONE Herts SG7 5LT NONE NONE NONE NONE British Association of Counselling & Psychotherapy Foundation for Psychotherapy & Counselling British Psychoanalytical Council Rare Breeds Survival Hebridean Sheep Society Ashwell Housing Association National Sheep Association Guild of Weavers, Spinners and Dyers Member of Green Party Husband: British Association for Local History Hertfordshire Association for Local 59 High Street, Ashwell History (Home) Hertfordshire Record Scoiety Farm fields at: Westbury, Farm fields at: Westbury, Rare Breeds Survival Trust Self-employed Shepherd, Hunts Close, Townsend, Hunts Close, Townsend, Hebridean Sheep Society teacher, landlord Baldwins Corner,
    [Show full text]
  • Polling Station List
    Polling Station Polling District Ward Polling Place Area Committee Baldock Community Centre, Large / Small Halls, Simpson Drive AAA Baldock Town Baldock Town Baldock Tapps Garden Centre, Wallington Road ABA,ABB Baldock East Baldock East Baldock Ashwell Parish Room, Swan Street FA Arbury Parish of Ashwell Baldock Sandon Village Hall, Payne End FAA Weston and Sandon Parish of Sandon Baldock Wallington Village Hall, The Street FCC Weston and Sandon Paish of Wallington Baldock The Old Forge, Manor Farm, Church Lane FD Arbury Parish of Bygrave Baldock Weston Village Hall, Maiden Street FDD, FDD1, FE Weston and Sandon Parishes of Weston and Clothall Baldock Hinxworth Village Hall, Francis Road FI Arbury Parish of Hinxworth Baldock Newnham Village Hall, Ashwell Road FS1,FS2 Arbury Parishes of Caldecote and Newnham Baldock Radwell Village Hall, Radwell Lane FX Arbury Parish of Radwell Baldock Rushden Village Hall, Rushden FZ Weston and Sandon Parish of Rushden Baldock Westmill Community Centre, Rear of John Barker Place BAA Hitchin Oughton Hitchin Oughton Hitchin Catholic Parish Church Hall, Nightingale Road BBA,BBD Hitchin Bearton Hitchin Bearton Hitchin Hitchin Rugby Clubhouse, King Georges Recreation Ground, Old Hale Way BBB Hitchin Bearton Hitchin Bearton Hitchin Walsworth Community Centre, 88 Woolgrove Road BBC Hitchin Bearton Hitchin Bearton Hitchin Baptist Church Hall, Upper Tilehouse Street BCA Hitchin Priory Hitchin Priory Hitchin St Johns Community Centre, St Johns Road BCB Hitchin Priory Hitchin Priory Hitchin Walsworth Community Centre, 88 Woolgrove Road BDA Hitchin Walsworth Hitchin Walsworth Hitchin New Testament Church of God, Hampden Road/Willian Road BDB Hitchin Walsworth Hitchin Walsworth Hitchin Polling Station Polling District Ward Polling Place Area Committee St Michaels Community Centre, St Michaels Road BDC,BDD Hitchin Walsworth Hitchin Walsworth Hitchin Benslow Music Trust- Fieldfares, Benslow Lane BEA Hitchin Highbury Hitchin Highbury Hitchin Whitehill J.M.
    [Show full text]