DOCSLIB.ORG

North Herts District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan to Support the North Hertfordshire Local Plan 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Herts District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan to Support the North Hertfordshire Local Plan 2011 North Herts District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan to support the North Hertfordshire Local Plan 2011 - 2031 September 2016 Prepared by Rob Shipway. RS Regeneration, on behalf of North Herts District Council 2 Table of Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 2. Profile of North Hertfordshire .......................................................................... 9 3. Context and approach .................................................................................... 12 4. The Local Plan Growth Strategy .................................................................... 21 5. Transport ......................................................................................................... 28 6. Education including extended schools ........................................................ 56 7. Healthcare ....................................................................................................... 72 8. Social Infrastructure ....................................................................................... 86 9. Emergency Services ....................................................................................... 99 10. Green Infrastructure ..................................................................................... 103 11. Waste and Recycling .................................................................................... 108 12. Utilities ........................................................................................................... 111 13. Infrastructure Funding & Delivery ............................................................... 125 Appendix 1 - Infrastructure Delivery Schedule ................................................ 133 3 Foreword This Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) as a document seeks to identify all relevant infrastructure needs that are anticipated over the whole plan period from this point starting forward and which can clearly be related to growth, so that there is clear evidence that such need is both known and actively being planned for. The content of this IDP is based on the potential implications of infrastructure need arising from meeting the district’s growth needs to 2031 together with any relevant development taking place in adjoining districts that might have significant infrastructure implications for North Herts. This is the basis that the figure of the circa 14,400 new dwellings is set out in Chapter 4 (Local Growth Strategy) to this report is arrived at1. The infrastructure needs set out in chapters 5 to 12 and the projects set out in the Infrastructure Delivery Schedule in Appendix 1 are based on this figure. Identifying infrastructure need over such a long period – up to 15 years – is by no means a straightforward matter, however. Few infrastructure providers are actively planning over so lengthy a timeframe and for that reason alone, the identification of needs in the later years of the plan period include a degree of speculation. More than this, however, the precise nature of what is needed in a range of services – indeed, perhaps all services – has and most probably will be in a constant state of flux. This is influenced by a range of factors such as changes in demographics and movements into and out of local communities, the power and influence of new technology and new arrangements for planning and delivering structure – not forgetting also that expectations of what communities feel they need to be provided with – is also constantly shifting. To this mix must be added the historic infrastructure that has been identified but never provided – what some call the infrastructure deficit. IDPs are rightly focused on what infrastructure is needed to make the emerging plan work and cannot expect to right past wrongs in terms of historic failures to provide what has been judged as necessary. However, the impact of already congested roads, underinvestment in health facilities and oversubscribed schools, for instance, cannot and must not be ignored. What this IDP hopefully achieves is the presentation of a balanced, well considered view of future needs related to Plan activities and how they can be carefully planned, adequately funded and delivered in a timely fashion. The additional benefit arising out of such a document is that it allows all those with an interest in infrastructure provision to stake stock and plan successful strategies to ensure that these needs become a reality. 1 The emerging strategy tested through this IDP was defined in advance of final decisions being taken on the sites and targets included in the draft Local Plan. 4 1. Introduction 1.1 The National Planning Policy Framework states that the planning system should “pro- actively drive and support sustainable economic development to deliver homes, business and industrial units, infrastructure and thriving local places that the country needs.” 1.2 Over the plan period from 2011 - 2031 North Herts district is currently and will continue to be focus of substantial housing and employment growth, which will result in increased pressure on local infrastructure, services and facilities. Given this, it is crucial that new infrastructure is provided, to support the delivery of new homes and jobs, and create sustainable and inclusive communities. Purpose of the IDP 1.3 The purpose of any IDP is to identify the infrastructure requirements arising out of an authority's Local Plan over the entire plan period, considering also the cost, timing, potential funding mechanisms and responsibilities for delivery. Those requirements will tend to be focused on the needs associated with housing growth, but also need to take into account the implications of other site allocations (particularly employment site requirements) and other local plan policies. 1.4 Infrastructure planning is a key part of the local plan in helping to demonstrate how its policies and site allocations can be delivered. Whilst it will not necessary provide a complete answer to all questions relating to this issue, it does allow the key challenges to be defined and the opportunities to be considered. 1.5 This process of defining infrastructure needs is one that involves the local planning authority working closely with infrastructure providers to determine requirements over time. Such engagement is an important process in itself as it will: enable infrastructure providers to give proper consideration on the scale, nature and location of growth, information which they can then factor into other elements of their service planning work encourage such providers to think beyond the relatively short term and also less parochially and more holistically (to see their infrastructure planning work in a wider context) alert them as to the available public funding opportunities (such as section 106 and the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)) and the opportunities that will exist to secure access to it 1.6 The Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) seeks to establish what additional infrastructure is required to support growth within the district from March 2016 to 2031. [As noted elsewhere in the document, the IDP is concerned with infrastructure needs going forward, not historic need associated with growth that has already taken place, so whilst the Local Plan covers the period 2011- 2031, a cut-off date on March 31st 2016 has been selected, and this document examines infrastructure need from that date until the end of the plan period – 2031] 1.7 Further to this, the IDP aims to: Review existing infrastructure provision in the district and identify gaps in provision 5 Set out what infrastructure is required to support growth, where the infrastructure is needed and when it should be delivered Detail the costs associated with the provision of infrastructure items in the district, identify potential funding sources, and highlight gaps in funding, where known Identify mechanisms for delivering infrastructure and outline the key stakeholders involved in the delivery process 1.8 A schedule of infrastructure projects required to support the delivery of the Council's Local Plan can be found in Appendix 1. What the IDP represents 1.9 It is important from the outset to set out precisely what an IDP represents (and equally what it does not). 1.10 The IDP is part of the evidence base to support the emerging Local Plan and therefore is required to be compatible with it. Its purpose is to identify the infrastructure requirements arising out of that plan over the entire plan period, considering as it does so the cost, timing, potential funding mechanisms and responsibilities for delivery. 1.11 The IDP is not a policy document, but instead responds to plan policies. Judgements about whether the policies and strategies that give rise to the infrastructure identified in the IDP are the appropriate ones are matters for the local plan; the IDP simply tracks any policy changes through subsequent iterations. The IDP should therefore be judged on whether the infrastructure that responds to local plan policies has been appropriately and accurately identified. 1.12 Finally, and critically, the IDP is concerned with the infrastructure needs arising from growth as set out in the Local Plan, and not about addressing any perceived deficiencies and/or underinvestment in the infrastructure currently provided. Furthermore, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia
    Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Contents Foreword 3 Looking Ahead 5 Priorities in Detail • Great Eastern Main Line 6 • West Anglia Main Line 6 • Great Northern Route 7 • Essex Thameside 8 • Branch Lines 8 • Freight 9 A five county alliance • Norfolk 10 • Suffolk 11 • Essex 11 • Cambridgeshire 12 • Hertfordshire 13 • Connecting East Anglia 14 Our counties connected 15 Foreword Our vision is to release the industry, entrepreneurship and talent investment in rail connectivity and the introduction of the Essex of our region through a modern, customer-focused and efficient Thameside service has transformed ‘the misery line’ into the most railway system. reliable in the country, where passenger numbers have increased by 26% between 2005 and 2011. With focussed infrastructure We have the skills and enterprise to be an Eastern Economic and rolling stock investment to develop a high-quality service, Powerhouse. Our growing economy is built on the successes of East Anglia can deliver so much more. innovative and dynamic businesses, education institutions that are world-leading and internationally connected airports and We want to create a rail network that sets the standard for container ports. what others can achieve elsewhere. We want to attract new businesses, draw in millions of visitors and make the case for The railways are integral to our region’s economy - carrying more investment. To do this we need a modern, customer- almost 160 million passengers during 2012-2013, an increase focused and efficient railway system. This prospectus sets out of 4% on the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Railfuture Oxford to Cambridge (East West Rail)
    9th September 2013 Railfuture Oxford to Cambridge (East West Rail) campaign Briefing note on route options for the Central Section from Bedford to Cambridge Introduction The government and the Office of Rail Regulation have approved the upgrading and rebuilding of the railway between Oxford and Bedford, the Western Section of East West Rail. Railfuture is a long-term campaigner for the completion of the East West Rail project to Cambridge and into East Anglia. The Eastern Section of the route is already in use from Norwich and Ely to Cambridge via the soon to be opened Cambridge Science Park station; from Ipswich via Bury St Edmunds and Newmarket to Cambridge; and from Stansted Airport to Cambridge. Map 1: The East West Rail Link Between Bedford and Cambridge some of the original route is lost to development and population growth in the region has occurred away from the original stations. The question of corridor and route selection is therefore a key factor in making the case for the Bedford to Cambridge (Central) section of East West Rail. Railfuture is assessing the candidate corridors that have been identified by the East West Rail (EWR) Consortium. An early conclusion is that routes for possible approaches to the two nodes, Bedford and Cambridge, should be agreed and protected at an early stage, such is the pace of growth and development. Page 1 of 10 9th September 2013 Purpose The purpose of this document is to set out the options for EWR route options for the approach to Cambridge from the west. The options for Bedford will be covered by another document.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog 210: Photographic Viewbooks
    R & A PETRILLA, BOOKSELLERS P.O. Box 306 Roosevelt, NJ 08555 Catalog 210: Photographic Viewbooks 1. Alabama-Georgia-Carolinas-Florida. SINGER SOUVENIR OF THE SOUTH: Set of Ten Photographic Views. s.l.: Singer Sewing Machine Co., ca 1900. First Edition. Comprises 10 photographic views (11cm x 18cm) of Southern cities and scenes, each with a full-page Singer ad on the verso. Views include: Court Square, Montgomery, Ala.; Selling Cotton, Newman, Ga.; Scene on the French Broad River, NC; Pringle House, Charleston, SC; Silver Spring, Head of Ocklawaha River, Florida; &c. In the original illustrated envelope, edges split but intact. Views in fine condition. 4.75" x 7.5" Very Good. Portfolio. (#036829) $90.00 [Not recorded by WorldCat, which does find one holding of a set of 10 views of Boston, issued by Singer Co.] 2. Alaska, Yukon Territory. A HAND BOOK OF VACATION TRIPS IN ALASKA AND THE YUKON ON THE WHITE PASS AND YUKON ROUTE (via the Steamer "Whitehorse") . Seattle: Farwest, 1940. First Edition. 56pp; illustrated from photographs and strip maps. This guide offers various Yukon tours, including: The Trail of '98 to the Klondike Gold Fields; West Taku Arm; Whitehorse and the Yukon River; Miles Canyon and Whitehorse Rapids; The Yukon River to Dawson; Dawson to Whitehorse: &c. The description of each tour includes a brief history of places along the route, a strip map, and views from photographs (several full-page). The original owner made three neat, marginal notes regarding costs. Pictorial wrappers. 3.5" x 6" Fine. Pictorial Paper Covers. (#037142) $50.00 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Times 12 December 2010 to 21 May 2011
    Train Times 12 December 2010 to 21 May 2011 Great Northern Route London 6,500 Welwyn Garden City re Hertford North mo Stevenage seats! Peterborough See page 116 for details Cambridge King’s Lynn CI.GNA.1210 thameslinkprogramme.co.uk visit information, more – 16January 2011.For 20November Blackfriars willbeclosed from London (2230 –0430)andmostweekends. evenings Friday Herne to HillonMonday late Bridge / InternationalandLondon Pancras St / Town noservices are Kentish between There London Connections Maida Vale ST. PANCRAS St John’s KING’S RAIL SERVICES Warwick INTERNATIONAL Essex Road Zone MARYLEBONE Wood EUSTON CROSS Hoxton NATIONAL RAIL SERVICES Avenue Great Angel 2 First Capital Connect Royal Oak Portland Street Chiltern Railways Cambridge c2c Old Street Heath Baker King’s Cross FARRINGDON First Great Western Regents Euston Square Shoreditch Street St Pancras High Street London Midland Edgware Park Warren Street Barbican London Overground PADDINGTON Road Russell MOORGATE Bethnal Bayswater Goodge Square National Express Street Green East Anglia Holland Lancaster Bond LIVERPOOL Southern Notting Tottenham Park Gate Street Court Road Holborn STREET Southeastern Hill Gate Chancery Lane Zone South West Trains Shepherd’s Queensway Marble Oxford Heathrow Connect Bush Circus Arch Covent St Paul’s 1 Heathrow Express Zone 1 Garden Whitechapel Green Piccadilly Leicester Aldgate TfL SERVICES Kensington High Street Hyde Park Circus Bank Kensington Park Square City (thinner lines) Olympia Corner Thameslink FENCHURCH Aldgate Bakerloo Line East Knightsbridge Underground station STREET Central Line CHARING closed until late 2011 CANNON Circle Line South CROSS BLACKFRIARS Bank District Line Kensington Sloane STREET Shadwell Docklands Square Westminster Light Railway Mansion Monument Tower Tower Temple Hill Hammersmith & Earls Gloucester VICTORIA St.
    [Show full text]
  • ED142 : NHDC Final Response to Inspector's Actions Arising out of The
    ED142 : NHDC Final response to Inspector’s Actions arising out of the Hearing Sessions Matter 6 – Deliverability Action Date on which Examination Doc Action Completed Reference No. • NHDC to provide updated version of Table A of Matter Enclosed as ED142 Appendix M6-1 6 Hearing Statement (to include infrastructure for other allocated sites (i.e. not housing sites)) and the Housing Trajectory • NHDC to provide updated Infrastructure Delivery Plan 23/01/ 2018 ED73 • Infrastructure Delivery Plan Appendix A 23/02/2018 ED73a Enclosed As Appendix M6-2 • Hertfordshire County Council to provide suggested 21/02/2018 ED105 Enclosed as additional/amended wording in the Plan regarding Appendix M6-3 transport issues for consideration by NHDC MM028, MM031, MM032 and MM033. • NHDC to liaise with Stevenage Borough Council with Enclosed as ED142 Appendix M6-4 regard to additional/amended wording • NHDC to provide note clarifying transport position 08/02/2018 ED86 Enclosed as with regard to B656 between Codicote and Appendix M6-5 Knebworth as raised by Mr Bamber of Save Rural Codicote • NHDC to provide note clarifying whether or not 08/02/2018 ED85 Enclosed as transport modelling shows that there is a need for a Appendix M6-6 southern bypass for Hitchin during the Plan period Appendix M6 – 1 ED142 : Note on Matter 6 / Table A – Infrastructure provision NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN EXAMINATION ED142: MATTER 6 Note to Inspector Matter 6 / Table A – Infrastructure provision 1. Following the hearing sessions for Matter 6 (Deliverability), the following action has been specified: • NHDC to provide updated version of Table A of Matter 6 Hearing Statement (to included infrastructure for other allocated sites (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hitchin (Cambridge Junction)) Order
    NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 THE NETWORK RAIL (HITCHIN (CAMBRIDGE JUNCTION)) ORDER TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990: REQUEST FOR DEEMED PLANNING PERMISSION TRANSPORT AND WORKS (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) RULES 2004 DfT Ref: TWA/09/APP/05 CLOSING SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED INTRODUCTION 1. These closing submissions follow the format of the SS Statement of Matters. Before embarking on the exercise, however, it is worth reviewing the position now reached with respect to the objections which made the inquiry necessary. 2. All the landowners (freeholders and those with rights in land) whose interests would be compulsorily acquired under the Order have either withdrawn their objections or are imminently expected to (NHDC, EDF, AWA, NG, Prime Estates, the farm interests etc.); or have not appeared to pursue them (SITA) content, presumably, to rely on their rights under the Compensation Code. AWA are now satisfied that their interests can be secured by the Schedule 12 protective provisions; as are the other statutory utility providers EDF and NG. 3. The objections of the statutory authorities have also been withdrawn. Natural England (who did not object) are content that ecological interests affected by the Order Works, particularly in the Burymead Springs area, can be adequately conserved and protected by conditions (DM Appendix th 7: Minutes of the 11 March 2010 Area Planning Officer’s advice to Committee). The Environment Agency have withdrawn their objection having reached common ground with NR on the protective provisions in Schedule 13 (EA email th 6 May and ‘Statement of Common Ground’).
    [Show full text]
  • 12/06/202017:34:00 Dear Mr. Haigh, Potential Plot-Land Development
    12/06/202017:34:00 31a Church Street Welwyn HERTS AL6 9LW www.cpreherts.org.uk [email protected] 01438 717587 Standing up for Hertfordshire’s countryside Mr . Colin Haigh Our Ref: Head of Planning Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council Your Ref: Campus East Welwyn Garden City Herts. AL10 6AE 12th June 2020 (by email) Dear Mr. Haigh, Potential Plot-land Development, Digswell Park Road We are writing to advise you of potential plot-land development on the fields between Digswell Park Road and Hertford Road. The land in question is pasture land to the north of Digswell Park Road, within the Green Belt and immediately adjacent to the Grade II* listed Digswell Viaduct. Earlier this year the landowner entered into a contract to sell this land (and allegedly the adjoining field to the south of Digswell Park Road). The land has subsequently been subdivided into plots, of which three have been sold and the remainder due for auction on 23 June. The purchaser, Country Land Conservation, a company registered in Ireland, state on their website that “Our main objectives with pasture and arable land once acquired is returning them to wildflower meadows. … We do have finances to compete with other developers who would look to acquire rural sites for development. The CLC’s actions with these pieces of lands can vary, the main importance would be to halt a possibility for development.” Consequently, it is puzzling that their agent is now advertising the plots as “the parcels offer an excellent opportunity for a number of potential uses along with future potential for development.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitchin Urban Transport Plan
    Hitchin Urban Transport Plan May 2011 Volume 1 Hitchin Urban Transport Plan 0300 1234 047 www.hertsdirect.org Table of Contents Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................ 0 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 2 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 2 1.2 Structure of the Document ............................................................. 2 2 Background to the UTP Area ................................................................ 4 2.1 Background to the UTP Area ......................................................... 4 2.1.1 Population ...................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Mode Share ................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Road Network ................................................................................ 5 2.1.4 Public Transport ............................................................................. 6 2.1.5 Walking .........................................................................................10 2.1.6 Cycling ..........................................................................................10 2.2 Road Side Interviews ....................................................................10 2.3 Development Growth ....................................................................13 2.3.1 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Download Alternative Route
    ALTERNATIVE ROUTES DURING DISRUPTION KING’S LYNN Suggested alternative 37* Watlington Downham Market routes during times of Littleport ELY disruption XL* Waterbeach 9*,12* Cambridge North PETERBOROUGH CAMBRIDGE Journeys via alternative routes may take longer than B* Huntingdon your normal journey or operate only at certain times. Foxton St Neots Shepreth Meldreth Sandy On some alternative routes, you may need to purchase BEDFORD X5* Royston Biggleswade Ashwell & a ticket and apply for a refund*. Full details of where Flitwick Morden Arlesey Baldock your ticket will be accepted will be available on our Audley End websites during times of disruption. Harlington Letchworth Garden City HITCHIN 97, 98 Leagrave Stansted 55 Airport GreatNorthernRail.com STEVENAGE LUTON 101 Watton-at-Stone Bishops Stortford ThameslinkRailway.com LUTON AIRPORT 100 Knebworth Hertford PARKWAY 301 HERTFORD NORTH East Welwyn North 724 Harlow Town Hertford Further information will be available from the sources Harpenden 366, WELWYN GARDEN CITY 301 Bayford Bus Stn 610 724 Cuffley below: 242 Broxbourne ST ALBANS CITY 301, 302, 601 Hatfield 602, 653, 724 242 Crews Hill Cheshunt Welham Green National Rail Enquiries 610 601 Brookmans Park Gordon Hill Enfield Enfield nationalrail.co.uk Radlett Potters Bar Town 84 Chase 03457 48 49 50 313 High Hadley Wood Grange Park Elstree & Borehamwood Barnet New Barnet 107 Cockfosters Winchmore Hill Transport for London Oakleigh Park Tottenham (Tube & bus services within London travel zones) Mill Hill Broadway Palmers Green Hale New Southgate
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Document for Winchmore Hill Ward Forum, 19/01/2016 19:30
    Public Document Pack WINCHMORE HILL WARD FORUM - 19.1.2016 MINIUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE WINCHMORE HILL WARD FORUM HELD ON TUESDAY, 19TH JANUARY, 2016 Present: Cllr. Dinah Barry (chair), Cllr. Ertan Hurer Apologies: Cllr. Elaine Hayward, Cllr. Bambos Charalambous (arriving late from an earlier meeting), Andy Barker (FLDRA), Notes: DB 1. REPORT FROM LOCAL POLICE PC Denise Thorpe gave a report covering the last three months. • Burglaries and car crime: theft of and from vehicles, is lower than for the same period last year. • Most burglaries are taking place between five and six o’clock when residents are still out at work and it is dark. • PC Thorpe has been taking measures to help us to be more secure: - delivering notices to houses if they have been left in darkness, making it evident that no one is home, - delivering notices advising people who have UPVC doors how to lock them securely, - checking motor vehicles to ensure that valuables are not left on display, - Checking car doors are locked - they often aren’t. In one road PC Thorpe found three unlocked cars. Residents should make sure that their automatic locking systems are actually working! 2. LOCAL RAILWAY AND TRAIN SERVICE Graham Smith, Infrastructure Maintenance Delivery Manager at Network Rail (NR) answered questions and listened to concerns. • He is looking to improve the trackside planting near Palmers Green. Trackside clearance is needed for safety but he will make sure it is more sensitively managed in future, • He is looking into the possibility of some planting to screen the track near the skew bridge in Hoppers Road, • He is meeting with Cllr.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Benefits of an Improved Understanding of Network Rail's Costs and Cost Drivers | Final Report
    Identifying the benefits Office of Rail Regulation of an improved understanding of Network Rail's costs and cost drivers Final Report Our ref: P22781801 May 2015 Client ref: ORR/CT/14-58 Identifying the benefits Office of Rail Regulation of an improved understanding of Network Rail's costs and cost drivers Final Report Our ref: P22781801 May 2015 Client ref: ORR/CT/14-58 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave Office of Rail Regulation 28-32 Upper Ground One Kemble Street London SE1 9PD London WC2B 4AN +44 20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this work for Office of Rail Regulation. This work may only be used within the context and scope of work for which Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this work without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this work using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... i Introduction ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]