DOCSLIB.ORG

Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Environmental Project Report Addendum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Environmental Project Report Addendum EGLINTON CROSSTOWN WEST EXTENSION ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT – 2020 ADDENDUM JUNE 2020 Metrolinx Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Contract: TC85-3A Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Environmental Project Report Addendum Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description Christa Beard Katherine A April 1, 2020 Marianne Alden Draft EPR Addendum Report Sara Khawaja Kung Christa Beard Katherine B June 3, 2020 Marianne Alden For Information Sara Khawaja Kung This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authorization of 4Transit being obtained. 4Transit accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify 4Transit for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. 4Transit accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, 4Transit accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether through contract or tort, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than 4Transit and used by 4Transit in preparing this report. H-175825-4T-EWE-00-RPT-EN-0001, Rev. B Table of Contents E.1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i E.1.1 Study Purpose .............................................................................................................................. i E.1.2 Summary of Proposed Design Changes .................................................................................. ii E.1.3 Existing Conditions and Effects .............................................................................................. iii E.1.4 Summary of Consultation/Engagement Activities ................................................................. iv E.1.5 Future Work and Project Implementation ................................................................................ v 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Study Background......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Summary of Proposed Design Changes ...................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Project Significance............................................................................................................. 9 1.4 Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.5 EPR Addendum Process ............................................................................................................ 11 1.5.1 EPR Addendum Approval Process ................................................................................... 11 1.6 Relevant Planning Policies, Studies, and Documents ................................................................ 12 1.6.1 Province of Ontario Planning Policies ............................................................................... 12 1.6.1.1 Provincial Policy Statement (2020) ......................................................................... 12 1.6.1.2 A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019) ............. 13 1.6.1.3 Greenbelt Plan (2017) ............................................................................................. 13 1.6.1.4 Greater Golden Horseshoe Transportation Plan (2017) ......................................... 14 1.6.1.5 Metrolinx 2041 Regional Transportation Plan (2018) ............................................. 14 1.6.1.6 Ministry of Transportation Southern Highways Program - 2017 to 2021 ................ 15 1.6.2 Greater Toronto Airport Authority Planning Policies ......................................................... 15 1.6.2.1 Toronto Pearson International Airport Master Plan - 2017 to 2037 ........................ 15 1.6.3 Municipal Land Use and Transportation Policies .............................................................. 15 1.6.3.1 City of Toronto Planning Studies ............................................................................. 15 1.6.3.1.1 City of Toronto Official Plan (2019) ................................................................. 15 1.6.3.1.2 Eglinton Connects Study ................................................................................. 16 1.6.3.1.3 Eglinton Connects Study Streetscape and Cycle Track Preliminary Design ............................................................................................................. 16 1.6.3.2 Region of Peel Planning Studies ............................................................................. 16 1.6.3.2.1 Region of Peel Official Plan (2018) ................................................................. 16 1.6.3.2.2 Region of Peel Long Range Transportation Plan (2019) ................................ 17 1.6.3.3 City of Mississauga Planning Studies ..................................................................... 17 1.6.3.3.1 City of Mississauga Official Plan (2015) ......................................................... 17 1.6.3.3.2 City of Mississauga Transportation Master Plan (2019) ................................. 17 1.6.3.3.3 MiWay Five Service Plan (2016-2020) ........................................................... 18 1.6.3.3.4 MiWay Five Service Plan (2021-2025) ........................................................... 18 1.6.3.3.5 MiWay Infrastructure Growth Plan .................................................................. 19 1.7 Consultation Program Overview ................................................................................................. 19 2. Update of the Project Description..................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Design Elements ......................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.1 Typical Runningway and Portals ....................................................................................... 20 2.1.2 Stations ............................................................................................................................. 20 H-175825-4T-EWE-00-RPT-EN-0001, Rev. B 2.1.3 Structures .......................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.3.1 Twin Tunnels ........................................................................................................... 21 2.1.3.2 Emergency Exit Buildings ....................................................................................... 21 2.1.3.3 Cross Passages ...................................................................................................... 22 2.1.3.4 Traction Power Substations .................................................................................... 22 2.1.3.5 Bridge Over the Humber River ................................................................................ 22 2.1.4 Modifications to Eglinton Avenue West and Traffic Management .................................... 22 2.1.5 Maintenance and Storage Facility ..................................................................................... 23 2.2 Construction Methods ................................................................................................................. 23 2.2.1 Below-Grade Construction ................................................................................................ 23 2.2.2 Elevated Construction ....................................................................................................... 24 2.3 Summary of Design Changes ..................................................................................................... 24 3. Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................ 28 3.1 Natural Environment ................................................................................................................... 28 3.1.1 Hydrogeology/Groundwater .............................................................................................. 28 3.1.2 Surface Water/Drainage ................................................................................................... 28 3.1.2.1 Scarlett Road to Weston Road ................................................................................ 28 3.1.2.2 Renforth Portal ........................................................................................................ 29 3.1.3 Fish and Fish Habitat ........................................................................................................ 29 3.1.3.1 Lower Main Branch
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hurricane Turns Aurora and District Into a Lake
    FEATURING A SPECIAL GUEST SPEAKER WineWine FROM DineDineBERINGER VINEYARDS & R.S.V.P. & 905-773-9329 as space is limited PRICE $65.00 Aurora’s Community Newspaper PRICE $65.00 PER PERSON + TAX & GRATUITY OCTOBER 28TH 7 pm sharp 49 North Lake Road Oak Ridges Vol. 3 No. 1 Week of October 15, 2002 905-727-3300 Renaming policy sacked by council in a recorded vote The controversial Public on July 11 the committee Facilities Renaming Policy pre- approved the draft policy and it pared by the Leisure Services was presented to council for Advisory Committee was back adoption. before Aurora Council last week A week later, the issue was but this time it was defeated on a deferred to the September 17 4-3 recorded vote. general committee meeting and Two councillors who had indicat- staff were directed to obtain public ed earlier support of the proposal opinion regarding the draft policy. were absent when the vote was Eight replies were received from taken. citizens with the majority opposed The issue was brought about to a renaming policy. some time ago when a request There was a controversial debate was received to change the name at the September 17th general of Willow Creek Park to Elizabeth committee meeting and a motion Hader Park, as a tribute to a by Councillor John West to, in young Aurora girl who lost her life effect, leave things alone was in a horseback riding tragedy. defeated. Her death brought about A follow-up motion by Councillor changes in legislation requiring Evelina MacEachern and second- stricter controls for riding stables ed by Councillor David Griffith (the in hopes that such action would two absent from last week's meet- prevent similar-type accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report
    STAFF REPORT April 12, 2006 To: Works Committee From: Gary Welsh, General Manager, Transportation Services Subject: Potential to increase the Number of Taxi Stands Adjacent to TTC Subway Stations (All Wards) Purpose: To respond to a request from City Council for a report on the feasibility of increasing the number of Taxi Stands in the vicinity of Subway Stations. Financial Implications and Impact Statement: The funds associated with the introduction of the appropriate regulatory signage are contained in the approved Transportation Services Division 2006 Operating Budget. Recommendations: It is recommended that: (1) the following 26 new Taxi Stands as described in Attachment #1, be established in the vicinity of Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Subway Stations; and (2) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including the introduction in Council of any bills that may be required. Background: City Council, at its meeting held on May 17, 18 and 19, 2005, in adopting Consolidated Clause 16 (j) in Works Committee Report 5, requested that Transportation Services staff report to the Works Committee on the feasibility of increasing the number of Taxi Stands around TTC Subway Stations, and further that representatives of the Taxi industry, in particular Ms. Souter, General Manager of Beck Taxi, be invited to depute on the item. - 2 - Comments: The issue of designating Taxi Stands in the vicinity of Subway Stations was last dealt with by the former Metropolitan Toronto Council in February, 1992. At that time, the former area municipalities were requested to implement designated Taxi Stands at Subway Station locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rouge River Rouge River
    Rouge River State of the Watershed Report Surface Water Quantity Goal: Surface waters of a quantity, volume and naturally variable rate of flow to: $ protect aquatic and terrestrial life and ecological functions; $ protect human life and property from risks due to flooding; $ contribute to the protection of Lake Ontario as a domestic drinking water source; $ support sustainable agricultural, industrial, and commercial water supply needs; $ support swimming, fishing and the opportunity to safely consume fish; and $ contribute to the removal of Toronto from the Great Lakes list of Areas of Concern. Surface Water Quantity Key Findings: The Main Rouge subwatershed has been subject to significant urbanization with an approximate total impervious cover of 18% as of 2002. Several studies suggest that the maximum impervious cover that a watershed can withstand before experiencing severe hydrologic changes and consequent geomorphic and ecological impacts is approximately 10%. There has been significantly less urbanization in the Little Rouge subwatershed and impervious surfaces make up only 2% of the subwatershed area. As a result, hydrologic impacts and related effects are much less severe than on the Main Rouge River. Average annual flows in the Main Rouge River show a long-term increasing trend of over 1.3% per year in the past 40 years. This rate of increase is significantly greater than that on the Little Rouge River or nearby rural watersheds and is indicative of the effect of urbanization on the hydrologic cycle. The Rouge River has become flashy and now generates high flows in response to rainfall events that caused almost no response in the river prior to widespread development.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report 1967-1969
    I FIRST REPORT 1967-1969 METROPOLITAN TORONTO LIBRARY BOARD FIRST REPORT, 1967-1969 of the Metropolitan Toronto Library Board THE BOARD Chairman: T. H. GOUDGE Members: JOHN M. BENNETT, M.A., Ph.D. CONTROLLER MARGARET CAMPBELL, Q.C. CARL W. CASKEY WALTER G. CASSELS, Q.C. C. DOUGLAS CUTHBERT HER WORSHIP, THE MAYOR OF EAST YORK, MISS TRUE DAVIDSON MRS. G. 0. MORGAN HARVEY L. MOTT Director: JOHN T. PARKHILL, M.A., B.L.S. Secretary- Treasurer: ANTHONY H. WINFIELD, CG.A. The Metropolitan Toronto Library Board was set up as a regional library board under the Public Libraries Act, 1966 and the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Amendment Act, 1966. It is composed of one person appointed by each of the six area Members of the Board who resigned during the three-year period: municipalities; the chairman of the Metropolitan Council, or his representative; one person appointed KEELE S. GREGORY (1967) by the Metropolitan Toronto School Board; and one person appointed by the Metropolitan Separate CHARLES L. CACCIA, M.P. (1968) School Board. Members of the Board are appointed for a three-year term. R. C. STONE (1969) REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN A writer about books has stated that "those works are most valuable that set our thinking faculties in the fullest operation." Many such works are contained in the historic Central Collections which had been brought together over the years by the Toronto Public Library. Never before have so many people sought out the rich resources of these collections and it is a matter of some significance that this growing interest has increased during the first full year of their operation by the Metro Board.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Emergency Response
    STAFF REPORT 14. INFORMATION ONLY COVID-19 Emergency Response Date: April 27, 2020 To: Toronto Public Library Board From: City Librarian SUMMARY The purpose of this report to update the Toronto Public Library Board on Toronto Public Library’s (TPL’s) operations, services and responses to the COVID-19 public health emergency, and its integration with City of Toronto’s Incident Management System. TPL’s pandemic plan has been developed in accordance with the best practices of emergency management and business continuity, and in alignment with the City of Toronto planning, including the Toronto Public Health Plan for a Pandemic, and the City of Toronto Pandemic Integrated Corporate Response Plan. TPL’ s Pandemic Response Plan and the emergency response structure are provided in Attachments 1, 2 and 3. FINANCIAL IMPACT The emergency shut down of branches at the end of day on March 13 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic will significantly impact TPL’s operating and capital budgets in a number of ways. Immediately following the shutdown, there were additional operating cost pressures, including the loss revenues from fines, printing and facility rentals. Some operating budget reliefs being experienced include savings in guard services, utilities, staff printing and office supplies. All staff continue to be paid. There are also additional costs being incurred related to setting up a remote workforce. Overall, for the first month of the shutdown, TPL estimates that there is a net operating budget pressure of nearly $1 million. As the shutdown continues, it is expected that lost revenues will continue, and additional savings will be realized for the operating budget, and this will be monitored and reported to the Board and City.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Islands Flood Characterization and Risk Assessment Project Flood Risk Assessment Report
    Toronto Islands Flood Characterization and Risk Assessment Project Flood Risk Assessment Report 30 April 2019 | 13017.101.R2.Rev0_FloodRisk Toronto Islands Flood Characterization and Risk Assessment Project Flood Risk Assessment Report Prepared for: Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. 101 Exchange Avenue Vaughan, Ontario For further information, please contact L4K 5R6 Josh Wiebe at +1 905 845 5385 [email protected] www.baird.com 13017.101.R2.Rev0_FloodRisk Z:\Shared With Me\QMS\2019\Reports_2019\13017.101.R2.Rev0_FloodRisk.docx Revision Date Status Comments Prepared Reviewed Approved A 2018/02/12 Draft Client Review DJE JDW RBN 0 2018/04/30 Final Final Report JDW RBN RBN © 2019 W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. (Baird) All Rights Reserved. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document, including any data sets or outputs that accompany this report, belongs to Baird and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person without the prior written consent of Baird. This document was prepared by W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. The outputs from this document are designated only for application to the intended purpose, as specified in the document, and should not be used for any other site or project. The material in it reflects the judgment of Baird in light of the information available to them at the time of preparation. Any use that a Third Party makes of this document, or any reliance on decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such Third Parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Round 2 Consultation Report 2020-2021, TO360
    Consultation Report TO360 Wayfinding Strategy 2020-2021 Public Consultation Round Two March 2021 Table of Contents Background .................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of the local map consultation ................................................................................... 2 Outreach and notification ........................................................................................................... 5 Summary of engagement statistics ........................................................................................... 9 Detailed feedback by local map area....................................................................................... 10 Other feedback about TO360 maps, in general ..................................................................... 19 Next steps ................................................................................................................................... 19 Attachment A: List of organizations invited to participate Attachment B: Round Two Draft Wayfinding Maps Background The Toronto 360 (“TO360”) Wayfinding project is a pedestrian wayfinding system which is a central component of the City’s ambition to make Toronto a more walkable, welcoming and understandable place for visitors and residents alike. TO360 provides consistent wayfinding information through a unified signage and mapping system delivered by the City and project partners. Following the successful completion of
    [Show full text]
  • CROSSTOWN LRT West Open House March 20, 2018
    CROSSTOWN LRT West Open House March 20, 2018 • Metrolinx was created in 2006 by the Province of Ontario to improve the coordination and integration of all modes of transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. • Guided by its Regional Transportation Plan, Metrolinx has worked to plan, design and build a regional transportation network that aims to enhance the quality of life, the environment and the prosperity of area residents. METROLINX’S GEOGRAPHIC MANDATE: THE GREATER TORONTO AND HAMILTON AREA (GTHA) Expansive • 8,242 km2 — 1.5 times the size of Prince Edward Island • Diverse spectrum of urban, suburban and rural land use Fast-growing • 7 million people in 2016 • Over 10 million by 2041 Complex • 4 levels of government • 30 municipalities Certain Metrolinx initiatives reach beyond the GTHA • 9 municipal transit agencies + • Select GO Transit services extend to an outer arc of communities Metrolinx including Peterborough, Barrie, Waterloo and Niagara • PRESTO and Transit Procurement Initiative serve communities across Ontario THE BIG MOVE $30+ BILLION IN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT OVER $30B IN INVESTMENT IN THE GTHA’S RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK EXPANDING GO 64 KM OF NEW 52 KM OF NEW CONNECTING IT TRAIN SERVICE LIGHT RAIL BUS RAPID ALL TOGETHER TRANSIT TRANSIT . Expanding and . More service on all revitalizing Union lines Under construction: Partially in-service, Station, the heart of . Eglinton with remainder the regional network . Electric trains, Crosstown under construction: every 15 minutes . PRESTO now in use or better in both In procurement: . Viva in York across the Region directions, for most . Finch West Region GO customers . Hurontario . Mississauga . Hamilton Transitway .
    [Show full text]
  • Is Toronto Fiscally Healthy? a Check-Up on the City’S Finances
    IMFG No. 7 / 2014 perspectives The Pre-Election Series Is Toronto Fiscally Healthy? A Check-up on the City’s Finances Enid Slack and André Côté About IMFG The Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance (IMFG) is an academic research hub and non-partisan think tank based in the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto. IMFG focuses on the fiscal health and governance challenges facing large cities and city-regions. Its objective is to spark and inform public debate, and to engage the academic and policy communities around important issues of municipal finance and governance. The Institute conducts original research on issues facing cities in Canada and around the world; promotes high-level discussion among Canada’s government, academic, corporate and community leaders through conferences and roundtables; and supports graduate and post-graduate students to build Canada’s cadre of municipal finance and governance experts. It is the only institute in Canada that focuses solely on municipal finance issues in large cities and city-regions. IMFG is funded by the Province of Ontario, the City of Toronto, Avana Capital Corporation, and TD Bank Group. Authors Enid Slack is the Director of the IMFG. André Côté is the Manager of Programs and Research. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Paul Bedford, Richard Bird, Kyle Hanniman, Zac Spicer, and Zack Taylor for their thoughtful comments on the draft paper, and staff at the City of Toronto and Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for their assistance with data collection. The authors alone are responsible for the contents of the paper and the opinions expressed, which are not attributable to the IMFG or its funders.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Canada Railway Society the Cover
    Upper Canada Railway Society The Cover Rapid transit comes to tbe suburbs I A westbound TTC Bloor-Danforth train is sbown bere on tbe newly-opened eastern extension of tbe subway, between Warden and Victoria Park Stations. It is skirting Bell's Busb Park and tbe Massey Creek Ravine — scenery wbicb no doubt newsletter comes as a pleasant surprise to many commuters formerly used to traffic jams on their way to work. See page 55. Number 268 May, 1968 — Ted Wickson Published monthly by the Upper Canada Railway Society, Inc., Box 122, Terminal A, Toronto, Ont. Coming Events James A. Brown, Editor ^xo:OT•^x•:•x•>x•:•>^>^^^^:•:•^^^^:^^ Regular meetings of the Society are held on the third Friday of each month (except July and August) at 589 Mt. Pleasant Road, Authorized as Second Class Matter by the Post Office Department, Toronto, Ontario. 8.00 p.m. Ottawa, Ont. and for payment of postage In cash. Members are asked to give the Society at least five weeks notice June 1: Steam excursion to Stratford, leaves Toronto of address changes. (Sat) at 0815 EDT. FARES: Adult S9.75; Child S5.00; Infant $1.00. June 9: A visit to tbe OERHA property at Rockwood is (Sun) being arranged. Write tbe Entertainment Com• Please address NEWSLETTER contributions to the Editor at mittee for details. 3 Bromley Crescent, Bramalea, Ontario. No responsibility is June 13: NOTE CHANGE OF DATE! assumed for loss or nonreturn of material. (Tburs) Outdoor meeting: A visit to CN's new Express Terminal at Toronto Yard, Keele Street at Hwy All other Society business, including membership Inquiries, should 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Relocation "Newcomer Phone Directory" Toronto Ontario ______
    CANADIAN RELOCATION "NEWCOMER PHONE DIRECTORY" TORONTO ONTARIO ___________________________________ Print this handy directory and use it during your move to Toronto. ALL NUMBERS ARE AREA CODE (416) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. When dialing within Toronto add the area code to the number. A new area code - 647 - has been added to the same geographical area as 416, not to replace but to co-exist with it as an "overlay" providing more numbers to meet Toronto's growing needs. ACCOUNTANTS/LAWYERS The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario: 962-1841 The Law Society of Upper Canada: 947-3300 APARTMENT RENTAL http://relocatecanada.com/easyrent.html ART, ENTERTAINMENT, ACTVITIES Art Gallery of Ontario: 979-6648 CN Tower: 868-6937 Newcomers Club of Toronto: 760-3949 Ontario Science Centre, PH: 696-3145 Toronto Symphony OrchestraPH: 598-3375 The St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts: 366-7723 Royal Ontario Museum: 586-8000 The Second City Theatre: 343-0011 Canadian Opera Company:363-8231 FINANCIAL SERVICES Daniel Chan Clarica Travel & Life: 416-818-7376 or 905-763-8888 extension 230 Bank of Montreal: 867-5050 CIBC: 1-800-465-2422 HSBC: 868-8000 Laurentian Bank: 1-800 522-1846 Royal Bank: 974-7763 Scotia Bank: 932-2161 TD Canada Trust: 982-4364 City Savings & Credit Union: 225-7716 Metro Credit Union: 252-5621 Ontario Civil Service Credit Union: 314-6772 TORONTO BUSINESS The Toronto Board of Trade: 366-6811 Canadiana Flowers: 265-6867 Dove Cleaners: 413-7900 Greater Toronto Home Builders' Association: 391-3445 The Toronto Port Authority: 863-2000 Metro
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Firefighters' Wages in Neoliberal Times
    Braedley 129 A LADDER UP: ONTARIO FIREFIGHTERS’ WAGES IN NEOLIBERAL TIMES Susan Braedley Postdoctoral Fellow, CHSRF/CIHR Chair in Health Services Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada INTRODUCTION They deserve it. You can’t put a price on people that are in a profession of saving people’s lives…You cannot compare people who save lives to people who pick up garbage or cut grass. If they [the other unions] try to use that comparison, we will blow them out of the water. (Toronto City Councillor Rob Ford, quoted in Gray 2007, commenting on firefighters' wage increase). he seismic economic shifts that came to the surface in 2008, dumping thousands of workers out of private sector work. They Tare beginning to hit public sector workers, who are experiencing pressure to make concessions and apprehension that they will be next for lay- offs. Although some governments have shown willingness to accumulate debt in these times, public sector workers are bracing themselves for an expected round of re-structuring, justified by declining government revenues. As this economic crisis closes the curtain on rampant neoliberalism and opens on what, at first glance, looks like a “revisionist” neoliberal next act, it is worth considering how one public sector unionized occupation – professional firefighting 1 - has been able to adapt to neoliberalism better than other public sector occupations. How and why have firefighters been able to maintain and even strengthen their labour position during a neoliberal period characterized by attacks on public sector wages and working conditions? This paper contributes to discussions about labour inequities by investigating the relations that have supported this masculinized labour sectors’ position.
    [Show full text]