Afmadow District Detailed Site Assessment Lower Juba Region, Somalia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Afmadow district Detailed Site Assessment Lower Juba Region, Somalia Introduction Location map The Detailed Site Assessment (DSA) was triggered in the perspectives of different groups were captured2. KI coordination with the Camp Coordination and Camp responses were aggregated for each site. These were then Management (CCCM) Cluster in order to provide the aggregated further to the district level, with each site having humanitarian community with up-to-date information on an equal weight. Data analysis was done by thematic location of internally displaced person (IDP) sites, the sectors, that is, protection, water, sanitation and hygiene conditions and capacity of the sites and the humanitarian (WASH), shelter, displacement, food security, health and needs of the residents. The first round of the DSA took nutrition, education and communication. place from October 2017 to March 2018 assessing a total of 1,843 sites in 48 districts. The second round of the DSA This factsheet presents a summary of profiles of assessed sites3 in Afmadow District along with needs and priorities of took place from 1 September 2018 to 31 January 2019 IDPs residing in these sites. As the data is captured through assessing a total of 1778 sites in 57 districts. KIs, findings should be considered indicative rather than A grid pattern approach1 was used to identify all IDP generalisable. sites in a specific area. In each identified site, two key Number of assessed sites: 14 informants (KIs) were interviewed: the site manager or community leader and a women’s representative, to ensure Assessed IDP sites in Afmadow4 Coordinates: Lat. 0.6, Long. 41.78 1.DSA targeted IDP locations in each of the assessed districts, For each target location, the area was divided into 1km2 grids. Enumerator teams then visited each grid to verify whether an IDP site was present. By visiting all grids teams were able to determine the total number of sites in each location. 2.Where KI responses were significantly divergent, these were verified with the respective KIs with a higher reliability attached to the response provided by the site manager or community leader. 3.Please note that this factsheet gives data on all accessible IDP sites in xx District and does not cover IDPs who may be living outside of sites, such as settlements with a majority of non-displaced households. 4.1km2 grids were created within the city and outskirt of the city, previous sites locations and locations mentioned by partners. Due to changing levels of access, and fluidity in creation and closure of sites, in some cases, sites outside the proposed grids were captured. Funded by European Union For more information on this profile please contact: Civil Protecon and CCCM Cluster: [email protected] Humanitarian Aid CCCM CLUSTER REACH: [email protected] SUPPORTING DISPLACED COMMUNITIES www.cccmcluster.org Afmadow district Detailed Site Assessment Lower Juba Region, Somalia Site Information Food Security 12 spontaneous sites 10,307 estimated number of individuals Market was the primary source of food reported in the sites. 2 planned sites 1,755 estimated number of households 50% of the sites were reported to have access to a market to purchase food. 21% of the sites were reported to have safe access to a market. 64% of the sites had reached full capacity. 43 Minutes is the average walking time to the nearest food market. 65% of the sites had a responsible Local authority. Food distribution types reported in the 3 months prior to data collection (% of 5 57% of the sites had not adequate space to walk between shelters and other sites): structures. 0+0+0 In kind food distributed 0% of the sites were reported to have shared community spaces. 14% Cash for food distributed 0% 7% of the sites were reported to have designated space for women ang girls. Meals distributed 0% 7% of the sites were reported to have child friendly spaces (CFS). Top three committees reportedly established (% of sites): Health and Nutrition 43+29+7 Elders committees 43% 14% of the sites had women most commonly giving birth with skilled Women committees 29% personnel. Residents committees 7% 29% of the sites were reported to have access to a health facility. 14% of the sites were reported to have safe access to a health facility. Protection 41 Minutes is the average walking time to the nearest health facility. Top three reported means to pay for rents (% of sites): 29% of the sites were reported to have access to nutrition services. 100+0+0 No rent 100% 35 Minutes is the average walking time to the nearest nutrition centre. NA 0% NA 0% WASH Top three forms of land tenure reported (% of sites): Total number of toilets and bathing facilities available: 43+36+21 None 43% Male toilets 0 Informal 36% Female toilets 0 Don’t know 21% Non-gendered toilets 161 Bathing facilities 0 43% of sites have been constructed on land owned by None. Percentage of sites by proportion of toilets/showers with light, 0% of the sites were reported to have public lighting. locks, and handwashing facilities: of the sites were reported to be at risk of eviction in the coming three months. 29% Most of Some Few of None 29% of the sites reported cases of eviction in the 3 months prior the data collection. them of them them of them of the sites reportedly had a fire in the 6 months prior to data collection that Handwashing 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% destroyed more than 3 shelters. facilities 0% of the sites reportedly had frictions between the IDPs and host communities. Toilets/showers 0% 0% 0% 100% 43% of the sites were reported to have women representation groups that can with light influence settlement/sites management. Toilets with locks 0% 0% 0% 100% Frequency of solid waste removal (% of sites): Displacement 71+14+7 Never 71% 140 was the number of families estimated to have arrived in the 3 months More than Month 14% prior to data collection. Weekly/Monthly 7% L/Juba was the most common region of origin of people in the sites. 57% of the sites reportedly had potable water sources available to M/Juba was the second most region of origin of people in the sites. residents. 100% of the sites were reported to have functioning water sources. 22 Minutes is the average walking time to the nearest water source. Shelter and Non-Food Items (NFIs) Education Top three shelter types reported (% of sites): 100+29+7 Buul 100% 29% of the sites were reported to have access to education facilities. Wattle Adobe 29% is the average walking time to the nearest school. Brick 7% 35 Minutes 21% of the sites were reported to have humanitarian agencies providing Communication shelter support to the IDPs living in the sites. 21% of the sites were reported to have access to a market selling NFIs 7% of the sites were reported to receive sufficient humanitarian information. and building materials. of the sites were reported to have access to feedback or complaints of the sites were reported to have a safe access to a NFI market. 14% 14% mechanisms. 51 Minutes is the average walking time to the nearest NFI market. Somali was reported as the most common language spoken. 5. Based on enumerators’ observations on whether there was enough space to walk through, such as roads and footpaths. Funded by European Union For more information on this profile please contact: Civil Protecon and CCCM Cluster: [email protected] Humanitarian Aid CCCM CLUSTER REACH: [email protected] SUPPORTING DISPLACED COMMUNITIES www.cccmcluster.org Baardheere district Detailed Site Assessment Gedo Region, Somalia Introduction Location map The Detailed Site Assessment (DSA) was triggered in the perspectives of different groups were captured2. KI coordination with the Camp Coordination and Camp responses were aggregated for each site. These were then Management (CCCM) Cluster in order to provide the aggregated further to the district level, with each site having humanitarian community with up-to-date information on an equal weight. Data analysis was done by thematic location of internally displaced person (IDP) sites, the sectors, that is, protection, water, sanitation and hygiene conditions and capacity of the sites and the humanitarian (WASH), shelter, displacement, food security, health and needs of the residents. The first round of the DSA took nutrition, education and communication. place from October 2017 to March 2018 assessing a total of 1,843 sites in 48 districts. The second round of the DSA This factsheet presents a summary of profiles of assessed sites3 in Baardheere District along with needs and priorities took place from 1 September 2018 to 31 January 2019 of IDPs residing in these sites. As the data is captured assessing a total of 1778 sites in 57 districts. through KIs, findings should be considered indicative rather A grid pattern approach1 was used to identify all IDP than generalisable. sites in a specific area. In each identified site, two key Number of assessed sites: 3 informants (KIs) were interviewed: the site manager or community leader and a women’s representative, to ensure Assessed IDP sites in Baardheere4 Coordinates: Lat. 2.1, Long. 41.7 1.DSA targeted IDP locations in each of the assessed districts, For each target location, the area was divided into 1km2 grids. Enumerator teams then visited each grid to verify whether an IDP site was present. By visiting all grids teams were able to determine the total number of sites in each location. 2.Where KI responses were significantly divergent, these were verified with the respective KIs with a higher reliability attached to the response provided by the site manager or community leader.