The Economic Basis for Continuity in Historic Western Shoshone Identities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Economic Basis for Continuity in Historic Western Shoshone Identities Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 3-14(1991). Seed-Eaters and Chert-Carriers: The Economic Basis for Continuity in Historic Western Shoshone Identities RICHARD O. CLEMMER, Dept. of Anthropology, Univ. of Denver, University Park, Denver, CO 80208. B•Y "historic Western Shoshone identities," I in an area around Jarbidge and Goose Creek refer to those I found in a short but intensive where there had lived, according to legend, a and productive six-week field season in summer race of giants that ate people and whose ghosts' of 1989. I call these identities historic, rather might still be encountered by the lone traveler; than contemporary, because they do not seem to Watatikka, 'seed-eaters'; Tokoitikka, 'snake- be products of contemporary political condi­ eaters.'' tions. Rather, they seem to either have arisen Steward (1938) made it quite clear that or persisted during the historic period, ca. 1880 throughout the Great Basin, groups of people to the present. Some might call this the "res­ living in specific areas were called by specific ervation period," but since less than 40% ofthe names, or identities, associated with the areas in Western Shoshone population was living on which they lived. These idenfities reflected reservations until well into the 1970s, that food sources, items of technology, or char­ designation is somewhat inappropriate. acteristics of specific areas. For example. These identities were aboriginal, but that is Steward (1938:71) noted that Railroad Valley not the point I wish to stress. Steward (1938: Shoshone called Southern Paiute ''Tavinai,'' 248) flatly denied these identities had any (Tapenii, 'sun-plural' or eastern-dwellers). significance. My purpose, then, is to ascertain Some of these names were applied to more than why they persisted during a period in which one group—for example, Tipattikka, 'pine-nut they would be expected to disappear, or why eaters.' This name was applied to Shoshones in they became more important when, if Steward the Reese River-Austin area, but it also was was right, they had not been so aboriginally. applied by Owens Valley Shoshone to the First of all, what were they? They are too Tubatulabal, and by people living north of the numerous to list here, but among them are Austin area to the Grouse Creek Shoshone in Goshute, or Kusiutta, named for the frequent northern Utah. Some, or perhaps most, of the dry dust storms in their territory and for their groups also applied the names to themselves, proximity to the Utes; Tosawihi, 'white knife although it is not clear from Steward's ethno­ carriers,' (White Knife Shoshone), named for graphy whether the custom was universal their use of white flint-like rock from the aboriginally (cf. Thomas et al. 1986:279-283). Tosawihi quarry area and for their frequent Although Steward was able to elicit much habitation of that area; TiPattikka, 'eaters of information on these identities and their pine-nuts,' so called for their heavy dependence parameters in the 1930s, there are any number on that food item as an important resource; of reasons for predicting their disappearance by Akaitikka, 'eaters of northern salmon'; that time. First of all, these identities, Niwitikka, 'people-eaters,' so named, not according to Steward, did not denote bands and because they ate people, but because they lived had no formal institutions associated with them. 4 JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA AND GREAT BASIN ANTHROPOLOGY Their bases were entirely geographic. In a nomic institutions that would subsume any pre­ sense, you were what you ate and where you existing identification with off-reservation areas. lived. Steward's insistence on the nonexistence Within a generation or two at the most, of bands and fixed territories among the Tosawihi, who constituted the bulk of Sho­ Western Shoshone has led to some lively shones at Duck Valley, would surely have debates (see Steward 1970; D. Fowler 1966; become "Sho-Pais"; Watatikka (Wata = Arte­ and C. Fowler 1982 for summaries). Never­ misia biennis seeds and other unidentified food theless, little additional information on the seeds [Steward 1938:21, 309]) in Ruby Valley nature of these food-named and area-named and along the South Fork of the Humboldt groups has been forthcoming, aside from C. would come to identify as "Temoke Sho­ Fowler's (1982) work with the Northern Paiute, shones," and so forth. An analogy with to be discussed below. Thus, Steward's asser­ another Basin group, the Southern Ute, tion that the identities were meaningless in terms strengthens this prediction: the Southern Utes of population units or political relationships did have bands with strong band leadership remains problematical but certainly is not to be (Clemmer 1989). The chiefs of the three south­ dismissed. There is every reason to believe that ern bands, the Weeminuche, Capote, and Tabe- with a shared culture and language, and a kin­ guache, along with their families, all settled at ship system that allowed for maximum flexibil­ Ignacio. But by the 1960s, band identification ity, these identities would be unstable, had become virtually nonexistent as a meaning­ amorphous, and ephemeral from the very start. ful factor in influencing the leadership or power Second, a hundred years of social, structure of the tribe (Johnson 1963:120). In economic, and political change would have the early 1980s, I encountered only one man, a made food- and area-named identities super­ little over a hundred years old, who identified fluous. Steward (1955:57-58) gave this assess­ himself with one of the bands (Capote). We ment of Western Shoshone culture change. would expect, then, that the dichotomy between reservation-based Western Shoshones and non- The Western Shoshoni were spared the more crucial difficulties experienced by Indians who reservation-based people would break apart any had a fairly tightly-woven fabric of community preexisting identities, and the conditioning of cuhure. When miners and ranchers entered lifestyles by either reservation situations or off- their country a century ago, individual families reservation, wage-labor situations would com­ readily attached themselves to white commun­ ities. When their native hunting and gathering plete the process. resources were depleted, they worked for wages sufficient to maintain their very low standard of THE CONSULTANTS living. Most Western Shoshoni . were only loosely tied to any definable locality or Imagine my surprise, then, when I found cohesive social group, for there were no these identities alive and well in 1989, community bonds beyond kinship and friend­ especially at Duck Valley, where the Tosawihi ship. Persons commonly wandered from place identity was known and proclaimed. I inter­ to place. Western Shoshoni acculturation has come about . through face-to-face viewed 52 individuals: 22 females and 30 association with whites. The individual males. The 40-50 age cohort yielded the largest families were quite free to adjust to changed number of interviewees (10) but the 50-60, circumstances. 60-70, and 70-80 age cohorts had nearly equal Third, it seems likely that persons who had representation. The largest number of inter­ reservation experiences would quickly become viewees was at Owyhee (17), with Battle integrated into reservation political and eco­ Mountain (10) and Lee (8) running close HISTORIC SHOSHONE IDENTITIES seconds. The greater frequency of interviewees Tosawihi individuals did see "Paiute" as over 40 years of age reflects the fact that submerging and denying every variety of Sho­ generally they knew more than those under 40 shone identity. In other words, you cannot be and referred me to others who tended to be in Paiute and also be Shoshone! No one claimed the same age cohort or older.' "Sho-Pai" or "Duck Valley Indian" as an For various reasons that I will detail here, identity. Two interviewees flatly denied the the research design focused on Tosawihi existence of the "Sho-Pai Tribe" as anything identity. Twelve interviewees identified them­ but a legal fiction. selves as Tosawihi. They, in turn, identified Other identities perceived by Tosawihi and another 10 interviewees as Tosawihi who did not consultants and applied to specific Shoshone identify themselves as such. In all, however, individuals were "Bruneau Shoshone"; more than half (55%) of those interviewees "Akaitikka" or "Fish Eaters"; "Tokoitikka" or identifiable as Tosawihi were self-identified as "Snake Eaters"; "Niwitikka," "Weiser Valley such. (Many more individuals whom I was not Paiute," "Northern Paiute," "McDermitt able to interview were identifiable as Tosawihi Paiute," "Paddy Cap Paiute," "Other Paiute," on the basis of known kin ties.) "Goshute," "Those Shoshones in Utah" (near The most frequent additional identities for Portage; most likely Akaitikka, Grouse Creek, self-identified Tosawihi were "Western Sho­ and Promontory Point Shoshones, cf. Madsen shone" and "Shoshone." Those Tosawihi not 1980:94-98; Clemmer and Stewart 1986:531), identifying themselves as Tosawihi most fre­ "Chinese," "Basco" (Basque), and quently identified themselves as "Indian" and "Bannock." One consultant said the Bannock second most frequently as "Western Sho­ also were called "Andavich," or "enemy." shone" or, simply, as "Shoshone." I found individuals self-identifying them­ Besides "Tosawihi," self-attributed eth­ selves in all categories except "Bruneau nicities were "Temoak Shoshone," "Amer­ Shoshone," "Northern Paiute," "McDermitt ican," and "Paiute," as well as what might be Paiute," or "Other Paiute," and I did not called other "old identities" such as interview any individuals identified by others as ''Watatikka," or "Tipattikka." One man "Chinese" or "Bannock." The four individ­ identified himself as "a person from Long- uals identified by others as various kinds of Mountain-Lying-Down," a former village near Paiute also identified themselves as Paiute, but Austin (Steward 1938:102), that Steward wrote without an area-specificity, aside from one as "Gu.vadakiiahunupi." Of a possible 10 that individual who identified himself as "Weiser might have had some claim to the label, only Valley" Paiute.
Recommended publications
  • WAU - Whereabouts Unknown Account Information
    WAU - Whereabouts Unknown Account Information WESTERN REGION 24 July 2018 Name Tribe EASTERN NEVADA FIELD OFFICE AHUMADA, SHARLENE G TE-MOAK WEST SHOSHONE (ELKO) ALVARADO, AMY A GOSHUTE INDIANS, UT ALVARADO, ROSIE S GOSHUTE INDIANS, UT ASTA, DELORES* GOSHUTE INDIANS, UT ATKINS, MARTIN DANIEL WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV BACON, LINDSEY D WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV BAIR, MARLENE GOSHUTE INDIANS, UT BAKER, TOBY* RUBY VALLEY RESERVATION BARNET, DARLENE A WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV BARREDO, BRENDA L TE-MOAK WEST SHOSHONE (ELKO) BEAR, GARTH GOSHUTE INDIANS, UT BEGAY, BETTY G GOSHUTE INDIANS, UT BENEVENTE, JOAN ROBERTA TE-MOAK WEST SHOSHONE (ELKO) BERAUN, CAROLONA P WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV BITT, ANITA J WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV BROADWAY, DEBORAH TE-MOAK WEST SHOSHONE (ELKO) BUFFALO, MERLE WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV BUFFALO, MIRINDA WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV CAMAS, EUGENE WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV CHARLEY, KENNETH TE-MOAK WEST SHOSHONE (ELKO) CHARLIE, LATIEA D TE-MOAK WEST SHOSHONE (ELKO) COFFEY LETONSA, DWAYNE MAX* WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV CONKLIN, JARED J TE-MOAK WEST SHOSHONE (ELKO) COTA, SELENE WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV DAVIS, TIMOTHY L WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV Page 1 of 5 WAU - Whereabouts Unknown Account Information WESTERN REGION 24 July 2018 Name Tribe DECKER, KEITH WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV DICK, CHARLENE L DUCKWATER SHOSHONE TRIBE DICK, THERESA MARGARET TE-MOAK WEST SHOSHONE (ELKO) DICK, VICKIE A WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV DIXON, MALANIE R WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, NV DOUGHERTY, SHAUN L TE-MOAK WEST
    [Show full text]
  • State and Private Forestry, Tribal Relations Regions 1 & 4 Tribes Of
    State and Private Forestry, Tribal Relations Regions 1 & 4 Tribes of Interest by State State Tribe(s) Idaho Coeur D’ Alene Tribe Idaho Nez Perce Tribe Idaho Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Idaho Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Montana Blackfeet Nation Montana Chippewa Tribe Montana/Wyoming Crow Nation Montana Fort Belknap Indian Community Montana Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes Montana Northern Cheyenne Tribe Montana Rocky Boys Chippewa Cree Montana Confederated Salish Kootenai Tribes Montana Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians Nevada Battle Mountain Band (Shoshone) Nevada/California Benton Paiute Nevada/California Bishop Colony (Paiute-Shoshone) Nevada/California Bridgeport Indian Colony (Paiute) Nevada Carson Colony (Washoe) Nevada Dresslerville Community (Washoe) Nevada Duckwater Shoshone Tribe Nevada Elko Band (Western Shoshone) Nevada Ely Shoshone Nevada Fallon Colony (Paiute and Shoshone) Nevada Fort McDermitt Nevada Las Vegas Paiute Nevada Lovelock Paiute Nevada Moapa Band of Paiute Nevada Pyramid Lake Paiute Nevada Reno-Sparks Colony (Washoe, Paiute, Shoshone) 1 State Tribe(s) Nevada Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Nevada South Fork Band Council Nevada Stewart Community Council Nevada Summit Lake Paiute Tribe Nevada Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Nevada/California Timbi-sha Shoshone Band Nevada Walker River Paiute Tribe Nevada/California Washoe Tribe: Includes: Carson, Dresslerville, Stewart, Washoe, Reno-Sparks, Woodsfords Colonies Nevada Wells Band Colony Nevada Winnemucca Colony Council (Paiute and Shoshone) Nevada/California Woodsfords
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • THREE SACRED VALLEYS): an Assessment of Native American Cultural Resources Potentially Affected by Proposed U.S
    Paitu Nanasuagaindu Pahonupi (THREE SACRED VALLEYS): An Assessment of Native American Cultural Resources Potentially Affected by Proposed U.S. Air Force Electronic Combat Test Capability Actions and Alternatives at the Utah Test and Training Range Item Type Report Authors Stoffle, Richard W.; Halmo, David; Olmsted, John Publisher Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Download date 01/10/2021 12:00:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/271235 PAITU NANASUAGAINDU PAHONUPI(THREE SACRED VALLEYS): AN ASSESSMENT OF NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL RESOURCES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY PROPOSED U.S. AIR FORCE ELECTRONIC COMBAT TEST CAPABILITY ACTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES AT THE UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DRAFT INTERIM REPORT By Richard W. Stoffle David B. Halmo John E. Olmsted Institute for Social Research University of Michigan April 14, 1989 Submitted to: Science Applications International Corporation Las Vegas, Nevada TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Description of Study Area 2 Description of Project 2 Site Specific Assessment 3 Tactical Threat Area 3 Threat Sites and Array 4 Range Maintenance Facilities 4 Programmatic Assessment 5 Airspace and Flight Activities Effects 5 Gapfiller Radar Site 5 Future Programmatic Assessments 5 Commercial Power 5 Fiber -optic Communications Network 5 Project - Related Structures and Activities on DOD lands 5 CHAPTER TWO ETHNOHISTORY OF INVOLVED NATIVE AMERICAN GROUPS 7 Ethnic Groups and Territories 7 Overview 7 Gosiutes 9 Pahvants 12 Utes 13 Early Contact, Euroamerican Colonization,
    [Show full text]
  • The SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTES and the NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE CONTROVERSY TEACHER BACKGROUND
    Timponogos - Ute Deep Creek Mountains - Goshute THE GOSHUTES the SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTES AND THE NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE CONTROVERSY TEACHER BACKGROUND The Skull Valley Band of Goshute Reservation, located approximately forty-five miles southwest of Monument Valley - Navajo Salt Lake City, was established by executive order in 1912 and covers 17,248 acres. With limited land holdings in a sparse, secluded landscape, the Skull Valley Band has struggled to develop a viable economic base. In the 1990s, the nation’s executive council undertook efforts to locate a temporary nuclear waste storage site on the reservation. The history of this controversial issue highlights the OGoshutes’BJectiV Estruggle for sovereignty, economic independence, and environmental security. - The student will be able to comprehend how tribal sovereignty is complicated by disagreements over land use, economic development, and state vs. federal control. They will also understand the econom ic and ecological variables that have shaped the Skull Valley Band of Goshute’s attempted acquisition of a nuclear waste storage facility. Teacher Materials At a Glance: We Shall Remain: The Goshute Goshute Sovereignty and the Contested West Desert Student Materials (chapter 4, 18:37–22:05)TIME Frame - Versatile Debate: Should the Goshutes Build a Temporary Two block periods with homework Nuclear Waste Storage Site on the Skull Valley Three standard periods with homework Reservation? YES: Forrest Cuch NO: Margene Bullcreek Procedure Using information from At a Glance: from We Shall Remain: The Goshute Goshute Sovereignty and the Contested West Desert and clips , teach your students about the controversy over nuclear waste storage on the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Reservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition for Declaratory Relief and in Alternative Informal Request for Commission Action
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) ) UINTAH BASIN ELECTRONIC ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC ) D/B/A STRATA NETWORKS ) ) To: The Commission PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND IN ALTERNATIVE INFORMAL REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION NORTHWEST BAND OF SHOSHONE NATION SKULL VALLEY BAND OF GOSHUTE INDIANS Stephen Díaz Gavin RIMON, P.C. 1717 K Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 871-3772 [email protected] Their Counsel Dated: March 27, 2020 Summary Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”) provides that Native American tribes be afforded the opportunity to be consulted regarding the means by which adverse effects on historic property will be considered before the construction of the undertaking.1 In the context of antenna towers and communications facilities, the Commission has made clear that applicants and licensees are required to assess whether certain proposed facilities may significantly affect the environment, as defined in Section 1.1307 of the Rules, specifically including construction that might disturb Native American religious sites. In re Sprint Corporation (Consent Decree), 33 FCC Rcd 3440 (Enforcement Bur. 2018). See also In re Nationwide Agreement Regarding the Section 106 [NHPA] Review Process (Section 106 Agreement), 20 FCC Rcd 1073 (2004). The D.C. Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals has only recently reiterated that the Commission has a binding legal duty under the NHPA to consider the impact of radio tower constructions on sites of historical, cultural and religious importance to the Native American tribes. United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Okla.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Wah Wah Valley Solar Energy Zone
    Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Wah Wah Valley Solar Energy Zone Ethnography and Ethnographic Synthesis For Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Solar Energy Study Areas in Portions of Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah Participating Tribes Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Ibapah, Utah Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, Cedar City, Utah By Richard W. Stoffle Kathleen A. Van Vlack Hannah Z. Johnson Phillip T. Dukes Stephanie C. De Sola Kristen L. Simmons Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology School of Anthropology University of Arizona October 2011 Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 1 WAH WAH VALLEY The proposed Wah Wah Valley solar energy zone (SEZ) is located in the southwestern portion of Utah and is outlined in red below (Figure 1). The proposed Wah Wah Valley SEZ sits in Beaver County, approximately 50 miles northwest of Cedar City and 34 miles east of the Utah/Nevada state line. State-route 21 runs through the length of the northern portion of the SEZ and provides access to the area. Figure 1 Google Earth Image of Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian Study Area The greater Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian study area lies in the Utah Basin and Range province within the Wah Wah Valley. The larger SEZ American Indian study area extends beyond the boundaries of the proposed SEZ because the presence of cultural resources extends into the surrounding landscape. The Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian study area includes plant communities, geological features, water sources, and trail systems located in and around the SEZ boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Temoke Hereditary Chief of the Western Shoshone
    Testimony of Frank Temoke Hereditary Chief of the Western Shoshone The following testimony is not written in Frank Temoke's own words, but rather as I interpret his meaning. Keep in mind that Frank was raised in a period when whites and Indians communicated in simple terms, a language often referred to as pigeon English. Having been raised among the native Shoshone People and having them a my playmates during my growing years, I must say that I am as comfortable with such language as any english, and believe that the following is very close to the language Frank would use if he had command of modern English. ~1Y~~ For the purpose of passing along testimony of how I remember things as they happened during my lifetime, and things told me by people who have gone before me, I am having the following put in writing. For background it is important that it's understood that although I was not born until 1903, many of the old ways remained during much of my lifetime. My people worked at jobs provided on ranches and mines, and even the railroad, but only for short periods. Much of the time we spent living in our old way. School to Indians seemed unimportant and neither my wife, Theresa, nor I ever learned to read. But not being educated has not stopped us from doing what we have felt was right, and learning all we could during our lives. I am proud that before I retired in 1972, I managed the Circle Bar Ranch for Charles and Peggy Evans here i~ Ruby Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • A Traditional Use Study of the Hagerman
    A TRADITIONAL USE STUDY OF THE I HAGERMAN FOSSIL BEDS NATIONAL MONUMENT L.: AND OTHER AREAS IN SOUTHERN IDAHO Submitted to: Columbia Cascade System Support Office National Park Service Seattle, Washington Submitted by: L. Daniel Myers, Ph.D. Epochs· Past .Tracys Landing, Maryland September, 1998 PLEASE RETURN TO: TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER DENVER SERViCE CENTER NATIONAL PARK SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ii List of Figures and Tables iv Abstract v CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION l OBJECTIVES l FRAMEWORK OF STUDY 2 STUDY AREAS 4 STUDY POPULATIONS 5 DESIGN OF SUCCEEDING CHAPTERS 5 CHAPTER TWO: PROTOCOL AND STRATEGIES. 7 OBJECTIVES 7 CONTACT WITH POTENTIAL CONSULTANTS 7 SCHEDULING AND APPOINTMENTS 8 QUESTIONNAIRE 8 INTERVIEW SPECIFICS 10 CHAPTER THREE: INTERVIEW DETAILS 12 OBJECTIVES 12 SELF, FAMILY, AND ANCESTORS 12 TRIBAL DISTRIBUTIONS AND FOOD-NAMED GROUPS 13 SETTLEMENT AND SUBSISTENCE 13 FOOD RESOURCES . 14 MANUFACTURE GOODS 15 INDIAN DOCTORS, MEDICINE, AND HEALTH 15 STORIES, STORYTELLING, AND SACRED PLACES 15 CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS AND ISSUES 16 CHAPTER FOUR: COMMUNITY SUMMARIES OF THE FIRST TIER STUDY AREAS 17 OBJECTIVES 17 DUCK VALLEY INDIAN RESERVATION 17 FORT HALL INDIAN RESERVATION 22 NORTHWESTERN BAND OF SHOSHONI NATION 23 CHAPTER FIVE: COMMUNITY SUMMARIES OF THE SECOND TIER STUDY AREAS 25 OBJECTIVES 25 DUCK VALLEY INDIAN RESERVATION 25 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Craters of the Moon 25 City of Rocks National Reserve and Bear River Massacre . 25 FORT HALL INDIAN RESERVATION 26 Craters of the Moon 26 City of Rocks . 28 Bear River Massacre ·28 NORTHWESTERN BAND OF SHOSHONI NATION 29 Craters of the Moon 29 City of Rocks . 29 Bear River Massacre 30 CHAPTER SIX: ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 31 OBJECTIVES 31 SUMMARY REVIEW 31 STUDY AREAS REVIEW 3 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 3 5 REFERENCES CITED 38 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 41 APPENDIX A 43 APPENDIX B 48 APPENDIX C 51 iii LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1: Map of Southern Idaho showing Study Areas 3 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • California-Nevada Region
    Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives California Nevada Introduction Page Introduction Page Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Beginning of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the U.S. Government and the Kahwea, San Luis Rey, and Cocomcahra Indians. Signed at the Village of Temecula, California, 1/5/1852. National Archives. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/55030733 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities California Native Communities To perform a search of more general records of California’s Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog, use Advanced Search. Enter California in the search box and 75 in the Record Group box (Bureau of Indian Affairs). There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of California, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites. Type California into the main search box for both. Related state agencies and universities may also hold records or information about these communities. Examples might include the California State Archives, the Online Archive of California, and the University of California Santa Barbara Native American Collections. Historic California Native Communities Federally Recognized Native Communities in California (2018) Sample Document Map of Selected Site for Indian Reservation in Mendocino County, California, 7/30/1856. National Archives: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/50926106 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic California Native Communities For a map of historic language areas in California, see Native Languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Records on Microfilm
    Native American Indian midwestgenealogycenter.org Records on Microform Access Your History 12602 NATIVE AMERICAN RECORDS Roll listings may be found in American Indians: A Select Catalog of National Archives Microfilm Publications Apache Apache Film Drawer 57 Camp McDowell: 1905-1909, 1911-1912 M595 Roll 15 Apache and Mojave Film Drawer 57 Camp Verde: 1915-1927 M595 Roll 15 White Mountain Apache Film Drawer 59 Fort Apache: 1898-1927, 1929-1939 M595 Rolls 118-125 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Caddo, and Wichita and Affiliated Indians Film Drawer 60 1895-1913 M595 Rolls 211-213 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Caddo, and Apache Prisoners of War or Fort Sill Apache Film Drawer 60 1914-1930 M595 Rolls 214-218 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Fort Sill Apache, Wichita and Caddo, and Delaware Film Drawer 60 1931-1939 (with Birth and Death Rolls: 1924-1932) M595 Rolls 219-223 Pima, Apache, and Mohave-Apache of the Camp Verde, Fort McDowell, and Salt River Reservations Film Drawer 62 Phoenix: 1928-1933 (with Birth and Death Rolls: 1924-1932) M595 Rolls 344-345 Pima, Papago, Maricopa and Mojave-Apache of the Fort McDowell, Gila River, Maricopa or Ak Chin, and Salt River Reservations Film Drawer 62 1934-1939 (Supplemental Rolls only) M595 Rolls 358-361 Jicarilla Apache Film Drawer 62 1892, 1893-1895, 1897-1899 M595 Rolls 399-400 Apache, Mohave, and Yuma Film Drawer 63 San Carlos: 1887-1890, 1892-1902, 1904-1912, 1914-1939 M595 Rolls 461-470 Shivwits or Shebits and Kaibab, Ute and Jicarilla Apache Film Drawer 64 Southern Utah: 1897-1905; Southern Ute: 1885-1892 M595
    [Show full text]
  • Payette National Forest Sawtooth National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Southwest Idaho Ecogroup Land Forest Service and Resource Management Intermountain Plans Region September Draft Supplemental 2008 Environmental Impact Statement Boise National Forest Payette National Forest Sawtooth National Forest Appendix D. American Indian Background Information Photos by David Ede The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326 - W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Appendix D American Indian Background Information Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... D-1 Nez Perce Tribe ................................................................................................................. D-1 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation, Idaho ....................................... D-3
    [Show full text]