DOCSLIB.ORG

Native American Records on Microfilm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Native American Indian midwestgenealogycenter.org Records on Microform Access Your History 12602 NATIVE AMERICAN RECORDS Roll listings may be found in American Indians: A Select Catalog of National Archives Microfilm Publications Apache Apache Film Drawer 57 Camp McDowell: 1905-1909, 1911-1912 M595 Roll 15 Apache and Mojave Film Drawer 57 Camp Verde: 1915-1927 M595 Roll 15 White Mountain Apache Film Drawer 59 Fort Apache: 1898-1927, 1929-1939 M595 Rolls 118-125 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Caddo, and Wichita and Affiliated Indians Film Drawer 60 1895-1913 M595 Rolls 211-213 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Caddo, and Apache Prisoners of War or Fort Sill Apache Film Drawer 60 1914-1930 M595 Rolls 214-218 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Fort Sill Apache, Wichita and Caddo, and Delaware Film Drawer 60 1931-1939 (with Birth and Death Rolls: 1924-1932) M595 Rolls 219-223 Pima, Apache, and Mohave-Apache of the Camp Verde, Fort McDowell, and Salt River Reservations Film Drawer 62 Phoenix: 1928-1933 (with Birth and Death Rolls: 1924-1932) M595 Rolls 344-345 Pima, Papago, Maricopa and Mojave-Apache of the Fort McDowell, Gila River, Maricopa or Ak Chin, and Salt River Reservations Film Drawer 62 1934-1939 (Supplemental Rolls only) M595 Rolls 358-361 Jicarilla Apache Film Drawer 62 1892, 1893-1895, 1897-1899 M595 Rolls 399-400 Apache, Mohave, and Yuma Film Drawer 63 San Carlos: 1887-1890, 1892-1902, 1904-1912, 1914-1939 M595 Rolls 461-470 Shivwits or Shebits and Kaibab, Ute and Jicarilla Apache Film Drawer 64 Southern Utah: 1897-1905; Southern Ute: 1885-1892 M595 Roll 543 Walapai, Havasupai, Yavapai, and Camp Verde Apache Film Drawer 65 Truxton Canon: 1930-1939 M595 Roll 580 Arapaho Cheyenne and Arapaho Film Drawer 57 Catonment: 1903-1927; Carlisle School: 1911 M595 Rolls 16-17 Cheyenne and Arapaho Film Drawer 58 1887-1888, 1891-1894, 1895-1939 M595 Rolls 27-32 06-0245 12/2019 Cheyenne and Arapaho Film Drawer 64 Seger: 1903-1912, 1914-1927 M595 Roll 479 Shoshoni and Arapaho Film Drawer 64 Shoshoni: 1885, 1890-1893, 1895-1937; Siletz: 1885-1925 M595 Rolls 498-506 Shoshoni and Arapaho and Winnebago Film Drawer 66 Wind River: 1938-1939 (Supplemental Rolls); Winnebago: 1904-1907, 1909 M595 Roll 663 Arikara Arikara, Grosventre and Mandan Film Drawer 59 Fort Berthold: 1889-1893, 1895-1902, 1903-1939 M595 Rolls 132-136 Assiniboine Flathead, Kutenai, Pend d’Oreille, Kalispel and Grosventre and Assinboin Film Drawer 59 Fort Belknap: 1885-1909, 1911-1939 M595 Rolls 126-131 Sioux and Assinboine Film Drawer 59 Fort Peck: 1885-1897, 1906-1912, 1923-1939; Fort Shaw: 1910 M595 Rolls 151-160 Bannock Shoshoni and Bannock Film Drawer 59 Fort Hall: 1885-1887, 1890, 1894-1939 M595 Rolls 138-144 Shoshoni, Bannock, and Sheepeater Film Drawer 60 Lemhi: 1885, 1887-1906 M595 Roll 248 Blackfeet Tribe Blackfeet Tribe Film Drawer 57 Blackfeet Agency: 1890, 1897-1939 M595 Rolls 3-11 Bloomfield Seminary Bloomfield Seminary Film Drawer 57 1924 M595 Roll 12 Caddo Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Caddo, and Wichita and affiliated Indians Film Drawer 60 1895-1913 M595 Rolls 211-213 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Caddo, and Apache Prisoners of War or Fort Sill Apache Film Drawer 60 1914-1930 M595 Rolls 214-218 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Fort Sill Apache, Wichita and Caddo, and Delaware Film Drawer 60 1931-1939 (with Birth and Death Rolls 1924-1932) M595 Rolls 219-223 Camp McDowell Camp McDowell, Lehi, and Salt River Film Drawer 63 Salt River: 1913-1917 M595 Roll 460 2 Cayuse Cayuse, Umatilla, and Wallawalla Film Drawer 65 Umatilla: 1886-1894, 1896, 1898-1905, 1910-1929 M595 Rolls 616-620 Cayuse, Umatilla, Wallawalla, and other Indians Film Drawer 65 1930-1939 M595 Rolls 621-622 Chehalis Skokomish, Clallam, Chehalis, Squaxin Island, Nisqualli, Muckleshoot, Quinaielt, Queet, and Georgetown Indians Film Drawer 58 Cushman: 1910, 1913, 1915-1920 M595 Roll 93 Puyallup, Skokomish, Nisqualli, Squaxon, Sklallam, and Chenhalis Film Drawer 61 Nisqually and Skokomish: 1885-1887 M595 Roll 302 Chehalis, Clallam or Sklallam, Nisqualli, Puyallup, Quinaielt, Skokomish, Squaxon, and other Indians Film Drawer 63 Puyallup: 1888-1909 M595 Rolls 407-409 Quinaielt, Chehalis, Nisqualli, Skokomish, Squaxin Island Film Drawer 65 Toholah: 1915-1925 M595 Roll 564 Chehalis, Nisqually, Quileute, Quinaielt, Skokomish, Squaxin Island, Ozette, Makah, Squaxin Island Reservations Film Drawer 65 Toholah: 1926-1939 M595 Rolls 565-569 Chemehuevi Mahave, Chemehuevi, and Walapai (Colorado River) Film Drawer 58 1885-1893, 1895-1905 M595 Roll 46 Mohave, Chemehuevi, and other Indians Film Drawer 58 1906-1929 M595 Roll 47 Mohavem, Cheehuevi, Cocopa, Yuma, and other Indians Film Drawer 58 1930-1940 M595 Roll 48 Chenhalis Puyallup, Skokomish, Nisqualli, Squaxon, Sklallam, and Chenhalis Film Drawer 61 Nisqually and Skokomish: 1885-1887 M595 Roll 302 Cherokee Census Roll of the Cherokee East of the Mississippi and Index to the Roll, 1835 Film Drawer 47 (Henderson Roll) T496 Cherokee Annuity Payment Roll (Drennen Roll), 1852 Film Drawer 67 7RA01 Cherokee-Delaware, Census Roll and Index, 1867 Film Drawer 67 7RA73-1 3 Records of the Cherokee Indian Agency in Tennessee, 1801-1835 (not indexed) Film Drawer 47 Correspondence and miscellaneous records: roll 1, 1801-1902; roll 2, 1803-1804; roll 3, M208 1805-1807; roll 4, 1808-1809; roll 5, 1810-1812; roll 6, 1813-1815; roll 7, 1816-1818; roll 8, 1819-1820; roll 9, 1821-1823; roll 10, Agency Letter books 30 Dec 1822 – 27 Dec 1827 and 6 Feb 1832 – 2 Dec 1835; roll 11, Fiscal records, 1801-1820, comprising (1) copies of accounts, receipts, and disbursements, 1801-1820; (2) Cherokee journals, 1801-1811; roll 12, Fiscal records 1801-1834, comprising Cherokee day books; roll 13, fiscal records 1801-1817, comprising (1) receipt book, 1801-1802, (2) journal and account book 1801-1817, (3) ledger 1801-1809, and (4) passbook 1801-1804; roll 14, Records of the Agent for the Department of War in Tennessee, 1800-1815, and records of Joseph McMinn, Agent for Cherokee Removal, 1817-1821 Cherokee Census of 1880, Residents of Cherokee Nation Film Drawer 47 Roll 1: Index 7RA07 Roll 2: Schedule 1, part 1 Canadian – Flint Districts Roll 3: Schedule 1, part 2 Going Snake – Sequoyah Districts Roll 4: Schedules 2-6 Cherokee Census of 1890 / Cherokee National Records Film Drawer 47 CHN3 Canadian District: Schedule 1 in 4 volumes CHN3-7 CHN4 Cooweescoowee District: Schedule 1, Volumes 1-9 Microform Guide CHN5 Cooweescoowee District: Schedule 1,Volumes 10-11; Delaware District: #130 Schedule 1, Volume 1; Flint District: Schedule 1, Volumes 1-4; Going Snake District: Schedule 1, Volumes 1-5 CHN6 Illinois District: Schedule 1, Volumes 1-5; Saline District: Schedule 1, Volumes 1-2; Sequoyah District: Schedule 1, Volumes 1-2; Tahlequah District: Schedule 1, Book 1 CHN7 Tahlequah District Schedule 1, Volumes 2-7 Cherokee, Payment Rolls, and Index (Starr Role), 1894 Film Drawer 47 Roll 1- Canadian, Coowekoowe, and Index 7RA38 Roll 2 – Delaware, Flint, Going Snake, and Illinois Roll 3 – Saline, Sequoyah, and Tahlequah Roll 4 – Copy of Cooweskoowe, Delaware, and Flint Roll 5 – Going Snake, Illinois, Saline, Sequoyah, and Tahlequah; Orphans and Supplemental ‘Old Settler’ Cherokee Census Roll, 1895, and Index to Payment Roll, 1896, 1895-1896 Film Drawer 47 T985 Eastern Cherokee Applications to the U.S. Court of Claims, 1906-1909 (Guion Miller Film Drawers 52-57 Roll Applications) M1104 Oklahoma Territorial Census, 1890 Film Drawer 87 Census taken by the Cherokee Government, not the Federal Government; we have XIII-334 roll 76 only. Cherokee (North Carolina) Film Drawers 57-58 1898-1899, 1904, 1906, 1909-1912, 1914-1939 M595 Rolls 22-26 4 Cherokee Tompkins Rolls, 1867; Cherokee Census 1867, v. 1-4 Film Drawer 67 7RA04-1 Records Relating to Enrollment of Eastern Cherokee by Guion Miller, 1908-1910 (index Film Drawer 57 is on roll #1). *Also on Ancestry LE and Fold3LE. Roll #12 contains: M685 (a) Index to Chapman and Drennen Rolls of 1851 (b) Chapman Rolls of Eastern Cherokee (c) Drennen Roll of Western Cherokee (d) Supplement to Siler Roll by Act of Congress, July 31, 1854 (e) Index to “Old Settler” (f) Old Settler Roll (g) Hester Roll of 1884 – Eastern Cherokee Enrollment Cards for the Five Civilized Tribes, 1898-1914 (Dawes Rolls): Cherokee, Film Drawers 47-49 Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole tribes. Index is on Roll 1. M1186 *Also on AncestryLE and Fold3LE Applications for Enrollment of the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes (Dawes Film Drawers 49-52 Rolls Applications). The applications contain additional information not on the census M1301 cards. The applications are grouped first according to tribe, then by relationship such as “by blood” or “minor,” and then numerically. The application number can be obtained from the census card in M1186. *Also on AncestryLE and Fold3LE Cheyenne Cheyenne and Arapaho Film Drawer 57 Cantonment: 1903-1927; Carlisle School: 1911 M595 Rolls 16-17 Cheyenne and Arapaho Film Drawer 58 1887-1888, 1891-1894, 1895-1939 M595 Rolls 27-32 Sioux and Cheyenne Film Drawer 62 Pine Ridge: 1886, 1887-1888, 1890, 1891 (Summary only), 1892-1893, 1894-1905, M595 Rolls 362-369 1907, Letters for 1909 Cheyenne Indians and Pauite Film Drawer 63 Red Moon: 1909-1912, 1914-1916; Reno: 1922-1924 (with Letters 1915, 1917-1920) M595 Roll 425 Cheyenne and Arapaho Film Drawer 64 Seger: 1903-1912, 1914-1927 M595 Roll 479 Northern Cheyenne Film Drawer 65 Tongue River: 1886, 1888-1939 M595 Rolls 574-579 Chickasaw Enrollment Cards for the Five Civilized Tribes, 1898-1914 (Dawes Rolls) Cherokee, Film Drawers 47-49 Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole Tribes. *Index is on roll 1. M1186 *Also on AncestryLE and Fold3LE 5 Applications for Enrollment of the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes (Dawes Roll Film Drawers 49-52 Applications).
Recommended publications
  • UMNP Mountains Manual 2017

    UMNP Mountains Manual 2017

    Mountain Adventures Manual utahmasternaturalist.org June 2017 UMN/Manual/2017-03pr Welcome to Utah Master Naturalist! Utah Master Naturalist was developed to help you initiate or continue your own personal journey to increase your understanding of, and appreciation for, Utah’s amazing natural world. We will explore and learn aBout the major ecosystems of Utah, the plant and animal communities that depend upon those systems, and our role in shaping our past, in determining our future, and as stewards of the land. Utah Master Naturalist is a certification program developed By Utah State University Extension with the partnership of more than 25 other organizations in Utah. The mission of Utah Master Naturalist is to develop well-informed volunteers and professionals who provide education, outreach, and service promoting stewardship of natural resources within their communities. Our goal, then, is to assist you in assisting others to develop a greater appreciation and respect for Utah’s Beautiful natural world. “When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” - Aldo Leopold Participating in a Utah Master Naturalist course provides each of us opportunities to learn not only from the instructors and guest speaKers, But also from each other. We each arrive at a Utah Master Naturalist course with our own rich collection of knowledge and experiences, and we have a unique opportunity to share that Knowledge with each other. This helps us learn and grow not just as individuals, but together as a group with the understanding that there is always more to learn, and more to share.
  • Kokoro Kara Heart Mountain Wyoming Foundation

    Kokoro Kara Heart Mountain Wyoming Foundation

    Fall 2016 KOKORO KARA HEART MOUNTAIN WYOMING FOUNDATION •”A Song of America:” 2016 Heart Mountain Pilgrimage •Exhibit Preview: Ansel Adams Meets Yoshio Okumoto The Walk Family: Generous Heart Mountain Champions All cover photographs from HMWF Okumoto Collection • Compassionate Witnesses: Chair Shirley Ann Higuchi “It was a miserably cold day and the documented the Heart Mountain journey, HMWF a Leadership in History Award people looked terribly cold. They got on and our longtime supporter Margot Walk, from the American Association for State the train and went away. My sister and I also provided tremendous emotional and Local History. He also brought in discovered we were crying. It wasn’t the support and compassion. more than $500,000 in grants to facilitate wind that was making us cry. It was such Executive Director Brian Liesinger, new programs, preserve buildings and a sad sight,” recalls 81-year-old LaDonna who came to us with lasting ties to Heart create special exhibitions. He has fostered Zall, one of our treasured board members Mountain, has also become one of those partnerships with the National Park who saw the last train of incarcerees leave individuals we esteem as a compassionate Service, the Japanese American National Heart Mountain in 1945. A pipeliner’s witness. When his World War II veteran Museum, the Wyoming Humanities daughter and our honorary Nisei, she grandparents acquired rights to collect Council and the Wyoming State Historic remembers the camp’s materials from the Preservation Office. Thank you, Brian, for eight-foot fence and camp, they crafted their all you have done to advance our mission guard towers and homestead from one of and your continued commitment to help continues to advocate the hospital buildings.
  • Case Studies of the Early Reservation Years 1867-1901

    Case Studies of the Early Reservation Years 1867-1901

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1983 Diversity of assimilation: Case studies of the early reservation years 1867-1901 Ira E. Lax The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Lax, Ira E., "Diversity of assimilation: Case studies of the early reservation years 1867-1901" (1983). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5390. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5390 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished manuscript in which copyright sub­ s i s t s . Any further r e p r in t in g of it s contents must be approved BY THE AUTHOR, Mansfield Library University of Montana Date : __JL 1 8 v «3> THE DIVERSITY OF ASSIMILATION CASE STUDIES OF THE EARLY RESERVATION YEARS, 1867 - 1901 by Ira E. Lax B.A., Oakland University, 1969 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1983 Ap>p|ov&d^ by : f) i (X_x.Aa^ Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate Sdnool Date UMI Number: EP40854 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
  • Tribal Perspectives on the Hohokam

    Tribal Perspectives on the Hohokam

    Bulletin of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center Tucson, Arizona December 2009 Number 60 Michael Hampshire’s artist rendition of Pueblo Grande platform mound (right); post-excavation view of compound area northwest of Pueblo Grande platform mound (above) TRIBAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE HOHOKAM Donald Bahr, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Arizona State University The archaeologists’ name for the principal pre-European culture of southern Arizona is Hohokam, a word they adopted from the O’odham (formerly Pima-Papago). I am not sure which archaeologist first used that word. It seems that the first documented but unpublished use is from 1874 or 1875 (Haury 1976:5). In any case, since around then archaeologists have used their methods to define and explain the origin, development, geographic extent, and end of the Hohokam culture. This article is not about the archaeologists’ Hohokam, but about the stories and explanations of past peoples as told by the three Native American tribes who either grew from or replaced the archaeologists’ Hohokam on former Hohokam land. These are the O’odham, of course, but also the Maricopa and Yavapai. The Maricopa during European times (since about 1550) lived on lands previously occupied by the Hohokam and Patayan archaeological cultures, and the Yavapai lived on lands of the older Hohokam, Patayan, Hakataya, Salado, and Western Anasazi cultures – to use all of the names that have been used, sometimes overlappingly, for previous cultures of the region. The Stories The O’odham word huhugkam means “something that is used up or finished.” The word consists of the verb huhug, which means “to be used up or finished,” and the suffix “-kam,” which means “something that is this way.” Huhug is generally, and perhaps only, used as an intransitive, not a transitive, verb.
  • Overlooked No More: Ralph Lazo, Who Voluntarily Lived in an Internment Camp - the New York Times

    Overlooked No More: Ralph Lazo, Who Voluntarily Lived in an Internment Camp - the New York Times

    11/24/2019 Overlooked No More: Ralph Lazo, Who Voluntarily Lived in an Internment Camp - The New York Times Overlooked No More: Ralph Lazo, Who Voluntarily Lived in an Internment Camp About 115,000 Japanese-Americans on the West Coast were incarcerated after Pearl Harbor, and Lazo, who was Mexican-American, joined them in a bold act of solidarity. July 3, 2019 Overlooked is a series of obituaries about remarkable people whose deaths, beginning in 1851, went unreported in The Times. By Veronica Majerol When Ralph Lazo saw his Japanese-American friends being forced from their homes and into internment camps during World War II, he did something unexpected: He went with them. In the spring of 1942, Lazo, a 17-year-old high school student in Los Angeles, boarded a train and headed to the Manzanar Relocation Center, one of 10 internment camps authorized to house Japanese-Americans under President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s executive order in the wake of Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor a few months earlier. The camps, tucked in barren regions of the United States, would incarcerate around 115,000 people living in the West from 1942 to 1946 — two-thirds of them United States citizens. Unlike the other inmates, Lazo did not have to be there. A Mexican-American, he was the only known person to pretend to be Japanese so he could be willingly interned. What compelled Lazo to give up his freedom for two and a half years — sleeping in tar-paper-covered barracks, using open latrines and showers and waiting on long lines for meals in mess halls, on grounds surrounded by barbed-wire fencing and watched by guards in towers? He wanted to be with his friends.
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793

    79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793

    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
  • Tribal Lands

    Tribal Lands

    ArizonA indiAn GAminG AssociAtion • AnnuAl report FY 2008 TRIBAL LANDS PAGE San Juan Kaibab-Paiute Tribe Southern Paiute Tribe Navajo Nation Havasupai Hopi Tribe Tribe Hualapai Tribe KINGMAN FLAGSTAFF Fort Mojave Tribe CAMP VERDE Yavapai-Apache Nation Zuni Tribe PRESCOTT Yavapai Prescott Tribe PAYSON Tonto Apache Colorado River Tribe Indian Tribes White Mountain Fort McDowell Apache Tribe Yavapai Nation PHOENIX San Carlos Salt River Apache Tribe Pima-Maricopa Gila River Indian Community Fort Yuma- Indian Quechan Tribe Community Ak-Chin Indian Community YUMA Cocopah Tribe Tohono TUCSON O’odham Pascua Yaqui Tribe Nation Ak-Chin Indian Community Havasupai Tribe San Juan Southern Harrah's Ak-Chin Casino Paiute Tribe Hualapai Tribe Cocopah Tribe Tohono O’odham Nation Cocopah Casino Hopi Tribe* Desert Diamond Casino I & II and Golden Ha’San Casino Colorado River Indian Tribes* Kaibab-Paiute Tribe Blue Water Casino Tonto Apache Tribe Mazatzal Casino Fort McDowell Navajo Nation Yavapai Nation White Mountain Apache Tribe Fort McDowell Casino Pascua Yaqui Tribe Hon Dah Casino Casino of the Sun Fort Mojave Indian Tribe Casino Del Sol Yavapai-Apache Nation Spirit Mountain Casino Cliff Castle Casino Valley, Avi Resort Casino Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Yavapai Prescott Tribe* Casino Arizona at Salt River Fort Yuma-Quechan Tribe Yavapai Gaming Center Casino Arizona at Talking Stick Paradise Casino & Bucky’s Casino San Carlos Apache Tribe Gila River Indian Community Apache Gold Casino Zuni Tribe Gila River Casinos at Wild Horse Pass, Lone Butte and Vee Quiva *Not a member of AIGA Letter From The Chairwoman It is with pleasure that we present our fifth Annual Report for the Arizona Indian Gaming Association (AIGA).
  • THREE SACRED VALLEYS): an Assessment of Native American Cultural Resources Potentially Affected by Proposed U.S

    THREE SACRED VALLEYS): an Assessment of Native American Cultural Resources Potentially Affected by Proposed U.S

    Paitu Nanasuagaindu Pahonupi (THREE SACRED VALLEYS): An Assessment of Native American Cultural Resources Potentially Affected by Proposed U.S. Air Force Electronic Combat Test Capability Actions and Alternatives at the Utah Test and Training Range Item Type Report Authors Stoffle, Richard W.; Halmo, David; Olmsted, John Publisher Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Download date 01/10/2021 12:00:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/271235 PAITU NANASUAGAINDU PAHONUPI(THREE SACRED VALLEYS): AN ASSESSMENT OF NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL RESOURCES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY PROPOSED U.S. AIR FORCE ELECTRONIC COMBAT TEST CAPABILITY ACTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES AT THE UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DRAFT INTERIM REPORT By Richard W. Stoffle David B. Halmo John E. Olmsted Institute for Social Research University of Michigan April 14, 1989 Submitted to: Science Applications International Corporation Las Vegas, Nevada TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Description of Study Area 2 Description of Project 2 Site Specific Assessment 3 Tactical Threat Area 3 Threat Sites and Array 4 Range Maintenance Facilities 4 Programmatic Assessment 5 Airspace and Flight Activities Effects 5 Gapfiller Radar Site 5 Future Programmatic Assessments 5 Commercial Power 5 Fiber -optic Communications Network 5 Project - Related Structures and Activities on DOD lands 5 CHAPTER TWO ETHNOHISTORY OF INVOLVED NATIVE AMERICAN GROUPS 7 Ethnic Groups and Territories 7 Overview 7 Gosiutes 9 Pahvants 12 Utes 13 Early Contact, Euroamerican Colonization,
  • COMANCHE COUNTY Oklahoma

    COMANCHE COUNTY Oklahoma

    COMANCHE COUNTY Oklahoma COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT Initial Release December 2016 . Revised September 2017 Contents Section One Community Contributors 1 Introduction 2 Mobilizing for Action Through Planning and Partnerships MAPP 3 Section Two Community Description and Demographics 4 Mortality and Leading Causes of Deaths 5 Social Determinants of Health 5 Education, and Income 6 Section Three MAPP Assessments: Community Health Status 7 Community Themes and Strengths 8 Forces of Change 9 Local Public Health System 11 Section Four Five Priority Elements Mental Health 12 Poverty 13 Obesity 14 Violence and Crime 15 Substance Abuse (Tobacco, Alcohol, Drugs) 16 Next Steps 17 Resources References Cited Works R1 Appendix A Comanche County Demographics, US Census Bureau A1 Appendix B Comanche County State of the County Report B1 Appendix C 2014 State of the State’s Health, page 66 C1 Appendix D County Health Ranking and Roadmaps D1 Appendix E Kids Count Report E1 Appendix F Comanche County Community Themes and Strengths Survey Results F1 Appendix G Comanche County Forces of Change Survey Results G1 Appendix H Comanche County Local Public Health System Results H1 Appendix I Comanche County Asset Mapping I1 CHA Updated September 2017 Contents Continued Resources Added – Revised September 2017 Appendix J 500 Cities Project J1 Appendix K Comanche County State of the County Health Report K1 Appendix L Lawton Consolidation Plan L1 Appendix M Lawton Consolidation Plan Aerial View M1 CHA Updated September 2017 Comanche County Community Health Assessment Section 1—page 1 Community Contributors A special thank you to all the Community Contributors who volunteer their time and energy.
  • The SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTES and the NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE CONTROVERSY TEACHER BACKGROUND

    The SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTES and the NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE CONTROVERSY TEACHER BACKGROUND

    Timponogos - Ute Deep Creek Mountains - Goshute THE GOSHUTES the SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTES AND THE NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE CONTROVERSY TEACHER BACKGROUND The Skull Valley Band of Goshute Reservation, located approximately forty-five miles southwest of Monument Valley - Navajo Salt Lake City, was established by executive order in 1912 and covers 17,248 acres. With limited land holdings in a sparse, secluded landscape, the Skull Valley Band has struggled to develop a viable economic base. In the 1990s, the nation’s executive council undertook efforts to locate a temporary nuclear waste storage site on the reservation. The history of this controversial issue highlights the OGoshutes’BJectiV Estruggle for sovereignty, economic independence, and environmental security. - The student will be able to comprehend how tribal sovereignty is complicated by disagreements over land use, economic development, and state vs. federal control. They will also understand the econom ic and ecological variables that have shaped the Skull Valley Band of Goshute’s attempted acquisition of a nuclear waste storage facility. Teacher Materials At a Glance: We Shall Remain: The Goshute Goshute Sovereignty and the Contested West Desert Student Materials (chapter 4, 18:37–22:05)TIME Frame - Versatile Debate: Should the Goshutes Build a Temporary Two block periods with homework Nuclear Waste Storage Site on the Skull Valley Three standard periods with homework Reservation? YES: Forrest Cuch NO: Margene Bullcreek Procedure Using information from At a Glance: from We Shall Remain: The Goshute Goshute Sovereignty and the Contested West Desert and clips , teach your students about the controversy over nuclear waste storage on the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Reservation.
  • Yavapai County County Seat: Prescott

    Yavapai County County Seat: Prescott

    County Profile for Yavapai County County Seat: Prescott Yavapai County, one of the state’s oldest counties, was among the original four created when Arizona was still a territory. Although Yavapai County originally encompassed more than 65,000 square miles, it now covers only 8,125 square miles, but is still as large as the state of New Jersey. It was called the "Mother of Counties," from which Apache, Coconino, Gila, Maricopa and Navajo counties were all formed. The provisional seat of the territorial government was established at Fort Whipple in Chino Valley on Jan. 22, 1864. Nine months later it was moved 20 miles away to the little mining community of Prescott. In 1867, the capital was moved to Tucson where it remained for 10 years. Then the capital was shifted back to Prescott, where it remained until 1889, when it was permanently relocated to Phoenix. Prescott is now the county seat of Yavapai County. Yavapai County offers many local attractions ranging from natural to cultural to educational. Scenic pine forests provide yeare-round recreational opportunities, and museums, monuments and rodeos reflect Arizona’s tribal and territorial past. Institutions of higher learning include two colleges and an aeronautical university. The county has experienced tremendous growth in recent years, with the population up by more than 30 percent since 1990. The U.S. Forest Service owns 38 percent of the land in Yavapai County, including portions of Prescott, Tonto and Coconino national forests, while the state of Arizona owns an additional 25 percent. Twenty-five percent of land in the county is owned by individuals or corporations, and 12 percent is the property of the U.S.