DOCSLIB.ORG

Petition for Declaratory Relief and in Alternative Informal Request for Commission Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) ) UINTAH BASIN ELECTRONIC ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC ) D/B/A STRATA NETWORKS ) ) To: The Commission PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND IN ALTERNATIVE INFORMAL REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION NORTHWEST BAND OF SHOSHONE NATION SKULL VALLEY BAND OF GOSHUTE INDIANS Stephen Díaz Gavin RIMON, P.C. 1717 K Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 871-3772 [email protected] Their Counsel Dated: March 27, 2020 Summary Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”) provides that Native American tribes be afforded the opportunity to be consulted regarding the means by which adverse effects on historic property will be considered before the construction of the undertaking.1 In the context of antenna towers and communications facilities, the Commission has made clear that applicants and licensees are required to assess whether certain proposed facilities may significantly affect the environment, as defined in Section 1.1307 of the Rules, specifically including construction that might disturb Native American religious sites. In re Sprint Corporation (Consent Decree), 33 FCC Rcd 3440 (Enforcement Bur. 2018). See also In re Nationwide Agreement Regarding the Section 106 [NHPA] Review Process (Section 106 Agreement), 20 FCC Rcd 1073 (2004). The D.C. Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals has only recently reiterated that the Commission has a binding legal duty under the NHPA to consider the impact of radio tower constructions on sites of historical, cultural and religious importance to the Native American tribes. United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Okla. v. FCC, 933 F.3d 728 (D.C. Cir. 2019). At no point since the enactment of the NHPA (in 1966) has the FCC not required historic-preservation review of wireless facilities. Id. at 736. Uintah Basin Electronic Telecommunications, LLC d/b/a Strata Networks (“Strata”), licensee of cellular radio station KNKN236, has constructed no fewer than five antenna tower sites without first submitting the towers to review pursuant to Section 106 of the NHPA. Strata through its agents has made a series of TCNS filings, which demonstrate that Strata constructed a series of antenna towers beginning in 2001 without submitting them to Section 106 review. 1 54 U.S. Code § 306102(b)(5). ii The Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation and the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Utah (collectively the “Tribes”), pursuant to Section 5(d) of the Administrative Procedures Act and Section 1.2 of the Commission’s Rules, request a Declaratory Ruling from the Commission that the radio antenna towers used by Strata for its cellular system have been constructed in violation of the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”) and consequently should (a) be ordered to cease operation immediately, (b) be deenergized and (c) ordered to have their radio station antennas removed as a result of the violation of federal law. In the alternative, and pursuant to Section 1.41 of the Commission’s Rules, the Tribes request that the Commission investigate the facts and circumstances under which these towers were originally built and then determine whether it should order Strata immediately cease operating the radio facilities located on the towers and/or determine what remedial efforts can possibly be made so that the towers have been brought into compliance with the NHPA iii Table of Contents Item Page No. I. Background 2 II. Parties and Interest 4 Northwestern Band of Shoshone Nation 5 Skull Valley Band of Goshute 7 The Interest of the Tribes 9 III. The Strata Towers Were Constructed without Undergoing Section 106 10 Review IV. The Commission Must Follow its Own Rules and Sanction Strata for its 12 Failure to Comply with the NHPA iv Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) ) UINTAH BASIN ELECTRONIC ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC ) D/B/A STRATA NETWORKS ) ) To: The Commission PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND IN ALTERNATIVE INFORMAL REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION THE NORTHWEST BAND OF SHOSHONE NATION (“Shoshone”) and THE SKULL VALLEY BAND OF GOSHUTE INDIANS (“Goshute”) (together Shoshone and Goshute the “Tribes”), through counsel and pursuant to Section 5(d) of the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”)1 and Section 1.2(a) of the Commission’s Rules,2 hereby request a Declaratory Ruling from the Commission that the radio antenna towers used by the cellular radio facilities licensed to Uintah Basin Electronic Telecommunications, LLC d/b/a Strata Networks (“Strata”) have been constructed in violation of the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”)3 and consequently should (a) be ordered to cease operation immediately, (b) be deenergized and (c) ordered to have their radio station antennas removed as a result of the violation of federal law. In the alternative, and pursuant to Section 1.41 of the Commission’s Rules4, the Tribes request that the Commission investigate the facts and circumstances under which these towers were originally built and then determine whether it should order Strata immediately cease operating the radio facilities located on the towers and/or determine what remedial 1 5 U.S.C. § 554(e). 2 47 C.F.R. § 1.2(a). 3 54 U.S.C. § 300101, et seq. 4 47 C.F.R. § 1.41. efforts can possibly be made so that the towers have been brought into compliance with the NHPA. In support whereof, the following is respectfully set forth.5 I. Background 1. Strata is the holder of cellular radio station license KNKN236 issued by the Commission. Strata has built and operates towers at least as far back in time as 2001 to provide service authorized by its license that were constructed without having undertaken its responsibilities under Section 106 of the NHPA, as listed in Exhibit 1 to this Petition. These towers cannot simply be dismissed as so-called “Twilight Towers” for which Strata and the Commission should not bear any responsibility6. The fact is that those towers were erected in violation of the NHPA. 2. Although in the Twilight Towers notice the Commission initiated a further proceeding to consider a Program Comment to address the issue of Twilight Towers, the Tribes note that nearly 2 ½ years later, the Program Comment has still not been finalized at the FCC itself, much less formally presented to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (“ACHP”). Indeed, like so much in WT Docket 17-79, the Commission’s proceeding is completely at a standstill. On August 9, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated in principal part and remanded the Commission’s Second 5 The Tribes have previously filed a Petition to Deny the renewal of Strata’s license. See File No. 0008814164. The issues raised herein relate substantially to that Petition to Deny. Accordingly, this Petition should be associated with that file. 47 C.F.R. § 1.2(b). 6 The Tribes are aware that the Commission has proposed a draft Program Comment that would effectively result in “grandfathering” towers constructed in the period 2001-05 without demonstrating compliance with the NHPA. See Public Notice, “Comment Sought on Draft Program Comment for the Federal Communications Commission’s Review of Collocations on Certain Towers Constructed without Documentation of Section 106 Review” in WT Docket No. 17-79, 33 FCC Rcd 10715 (2017) (“Twilight Towers Notice”). Therein, the Commission noted that “FCC will not take enforcement action relating to the construction of Twilight Towers based on the failure to follow any particular method of considering historic preservation issues or otherwise based on the good faith deployment of Twilight Towers.” Id., at 10718. - 2 - Report and Order in WT Docket 17-79. See United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Okla. v. FCC, 933 F.3d 728 (D.C. Cir. 2019). More than seven months later, however, essentially nothing has happened in the proceeding, other than the Commission’s acknowledging, as directed by the vacatur of the Second Report and Order in WT Docket 17-79, that like all wireless undertakings, “deployments of small wireless facilities are subject to review to the same extent as larger wireless facilities pursuant to the [NHPA] and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.”7 Despite the vacatur and remand, the Commission has taken no further action to date.8 3. Thus, the present state of the law is clear: At the time of the Strata constructions, the Commission’s environmental rules did then and still require licensees and applicants to evaluate whether proposed facilities may affect historic properties under the NHPA. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(a)(4). Thus, there should have been a determination made of the Strata sites under the NHPA prior to their initial construction. Strata failed to do so when they constructed the towers. 4. Section 106 of the NHPA provides that a federal agency “having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed Federal or federally assisted undertaking … prior to the issuance of any license, shall take into account the effect of the undertaking on any historic property.” A federal undertaking includes “a project, activity or program” that is “carried out by or on behalf of the Federal agency,” “carried out with Federal financial assistance,” or that requires “a Federal permit, license, or approval.” 54 U.S.C. § 300320(3); 36 C.F.R. § 16(y). In reviewing the NHPA, the courts have read this definition broadly, stating that “Congress intended to expand the definition of an 'undertaking'—formerly limited 7 In the Matter of Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment (Order), 34 FCC Rcd 9366, 9367 (Wireless Tel. Bur. 2019). 8 47 U.S.C. § 402(h). - 3 - to federally funded or licensed projects—to include projects requiring a federal 'permit' or merely federal 'approval’”9 such as cellular telephone license.
Recommended publications
  • Oregon-California Trails Association Convention Booklet

    Oregon-California Trails Association Convention Booklet

    Oregon-California Trails Association Thirty-Sixth Annual Convention August 6 – 11, 2018 Convention Booklet Theme: Rails and Trails - Confluence and Impact at Utah’s Crossroads of the West \ 1 | P a g e Table of Contents Page 2 Invitation & Contact Info 3 Registration Information 4 Acknowledgement of Risk 5 Menu 7 Mail in Form 9 Schedule & Daily Events 11 Activity Stations/Displays 12 Speakers 14 Activity Station Presenters 16 Tour Guides 17 Pre-& Post-Convention Tour Descriptions 20 Convention Bus Tour Descriptions 22 Special Events 22 Book Room, Exhibits, & Authors Night 23 Accommodations (Hotels, RV sites) 24 State Parks 24 Places to Visit 26 Suggested Reading List, Sun & Altitude & Ogden-Eccles Conference Center Area Maps 2415 Washington Blvd. Ogden, Utah 84401 27-28 Convention Center Maps An Invitation to OCTA’s Thirty-Sixth Annual Convention On behalf of the Utah Crossroads Chapter, we invite you to the 2018 OCTA Convention at the Eccles Convention Center in Ogden, Utah. Northern Utah was in many ways a Crossroads long before the emigrants, settlers, railroad and military came here. As early as pre-Fremont Native Americans, we find evidence of trails and trade routes across this geographic area. The trappers and traders, both English and American, knew the area and crisscrossed it following many of the Native American trails. They also established new routes. Explorers sought additional routes to avoid natural barriers such as the mountains and the Great Salt Lake. As emigrants and settlers traveled west, knowledge of the area spread. The Crossroads designation was permanently established once the Railroad spanned the nation.
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
  • THREE SACRED VALLEYS): an Assessment of Native American Cultural Resources Potentially Affected by Proposed U.S

    THREE SACRED VALLEYS): an Assessment of Native American Cultural Resources Potentially Affected by Proposed U.S

    Paitu Nanasuagaindu Pahonupi (THREE SACRED VALLEYS): An Assessment of Native American Cultural Resources Potentially Affected by Proposed U.S. Air Force Electronic Combat Test Capability Actions and Alternatives at the Utah Test and Training Range Item Type Report Authors Stoffle, Richard W.; Halmo, David; Olmsted, John Publisher Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Download date 01/10/2021 12:00:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/271235 PAITU NANASUAGAINDU PAHONUPI(THREE SACRED VALLEYS): AN ASSESSMENT OF NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL RESOURCES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY PROPOSED U.S. AIR FORCE ELECTRONIC COMBAT TEST CAPABILITY ACTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES AT THE UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DRAFT INTERIM REPORT By Richard W. Stoffle David B. Halmo John E. Olmsted Institute for Social Research University of Michigan April 14, 1989 Submitted to: Science Applications International Corporation Las Vegas, Nevada TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Description of Study Area 2 Description of Project 2 Site Specific Assessment 3 Tactical Threat Area 3 Threat Sites and Array 4 Range Maintenance Facilities 4 Programmatic Assessment 5 Airspace and Flight Activities Effects 5 Gapfiller Radar Site 5 Future Programmatic Assessments 5 Commercial Power 5 Fiber -optic Communications Network 5 Project - Related Structures and Activities on DOD lands 5 CHAPTER TWO ETHNOHISTORY OF INVOLVED NATIVE AMERICAN GROUPS 7 Ethnic Groups and Territories 7 Overview 7 Gosiutes 9 Pahvants 12 Utes 13 Early Contact, Euroamerican Colonization,
  • The SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTES and the NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE CONTROVERSY TEACHER BACKGROUND

    The SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTES and the NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE CONTROVERSY TEACHER BACKGROUND

    Timponogos - Ute Deep Creek Mountains - Goshute THE GOSHUTES the SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTES AND THE NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE CONTROVERSY TEACHER BACKGROUND The Skull Valley Band of Goshute Reservation, located approximately forty-five miles southwest of Monument Valley - Navajo Salt Lake City, was established by executive order in 1912 and covers 17,248 acres. With limited land holdings in a sparse, secluded landscape, the Skull Valley Band has struggled to develop a viable economic base. In the 1990s, the nation’s executive council undertook efforts to locate a temporary nuclear waste storage site on the reservation. The history of this controversial issue highlights the OGoshutes’BJectiV Estruggle for sovereignty, economic independence, and environmental security. - The student will be able to comprehend how tribal sovereignty is complicated by disagreements over land use, economic development, and state vs. federal control. They will also understand the econom ic and ecological variables that have shaped the Skull Valley Band of Goshute’s attempted acquisition of a nuclear waste storage facility. Teacher Materials At a Glance: We Shall Remain: The Goshute Goshute Sovereignty and the Contested West Desert Student Materials (chapter 4, 18:37–22:05)TIME Frame - Versatile Debate: Should the Goshutes Build a Temporary Two block periods with homework Nuclear Waste Storage Site on the Skull Valley Three standard periods with homework Reservation? YES: Forrest Cuch NO: Margene Bullcreek Procedure Using information from At a Glance: from We Shall Remain: The Goshute Goshute Sovereignty and the Contested West Desert and clips , teach your students about the controversy over nuclear waste storage on the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Reservation.
  • Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Wah Wah Valley Solar Energy Zone

    Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Wah Wah Valley Solar Energy Zone

    Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Wah Wah Valley Solar Energy Zone Ethnography and Ethnographic Synthesis For Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Solar Energy Study Areas in Portions of Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah Participating Tribes Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Ibapah, Utah Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, Cedar City, Utah By Richard W. Stoffle Kathleen A. Van Vlack Hannah Z. Johnson Phillip T. Dukes Stephanie C. De Sola Kristen L. Simmons Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology School of Anthropology University of Arizona October 2011 Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 1 WAH WAH VALLEY The proposed Wah Wah Valley solar energy zone (SEZ) is located in the southwestern portion of Utah and is outlined in red below (Figure 1). The proposed Wah Wah Valley SEZ sits in Beaver County, approximately 50 miles northwest of Cedar City and 34 miles east of the Utah/Nevada state line. State-route 21 runs through the length of the northern portion of the SEZ and provides access to the area. Figure 1 Google Earth Image of Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian Study Area The greater Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian study area lies in the Utah Basin and Range province within the Wah Wah Valley. The larger SEZ American Indian study area extends beyond the boundaries of the proposed SEZ because the presence of cultural resources extends into the surrounding landscape. The Wah Wah Valley SEZ American Indian study area includes plant communities, geological features, water sources, and trail systems located in and around the SEZ boundary.
  • California-Nevada Region

    California-Nevada Region

    Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives California Nevada Introduction Page Introduction Page Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Beginning of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the U.S. Government and the Kahwea, San Luis Rey, and Cocomcahra Indians. Signed at the Village of Temecula, California, 1/5/1852. National Archives. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/55030733 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities California Native Communities To perform a search of more general records of California’s Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog, use Advanced Search. Enter California in the search box and 75 in the Record Group box (Bureau of Indian Affairs). There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of California, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites. Type California into the main search box for both. Related state agencies and universities may also hold records or information about these communities. Examples might include the California State Archives, the Online Archive of California, and the University of California Santa Barbara Native American Collections. Historic California Native Communities Federally Recognized Native Communities in California (2018) Sample Document Map of Selected Site for Indian Reservation in Mendocino County, California, 7/30/1856. National Archives: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/50926106 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic California Native Communities For a map of historic language areas in California, see Native Languages.
  • Native American Records on Microfilm

    Native American Records on Microfilm

    Native American Indian midwestgenealogycenter.org Records on Microform Access Your History 12602 NATIVE AMERICAN RECORDS Roll listings may be found in American Indians: A Select Catalog of National Archives Microfilm Publications Apache Apache Film Drawer 57 Camp McDowell: 1905-1909, 1911-1912 M595 Roll 15 Apache and Mojave Film Drawer 57 Camp Verde: 1915-1927 M595 Roll 15 White Mountain Apache Film Drawer 59 Fort Apache: 1898-1927, 1929-1939 M595 Rolls 118-125 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Caddo, and Wichita and Affiliated Indians Film Drawer 60 1895-1913 M595 Rolls 211-213 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Caddo, and Apache Prisoners of War or Fort Sill Apache Film Drawer 60 1914-1930 M595 Rolls 214-218 Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, Fort Sill Apache, Wichita and Caddo, and Delaware Film Drawer 60 1931-1939 (with Birth and Death Rolls: 1924-1932) M595 Rolls 219-223 Pima, Apache, and Mohave-Apache of the Camp Verde, Fort McDowell, and Salt River Reservations Film Drawer 62 Phoenix: 1928-1933 (with Birth and Death Rolls: 1924-1932) M595 Rolls 344-345 Pima, Papago, Maricopa and Mojave-Apache of the Fort McDowell, Gila River, Maricopa or Ak Chin, and Salt River Reservations Film Drawer 62 1934-1939 (Supplemental Rolls only) M595 Rolls 358-361 Jicarilla Apache Film Drawer 62 1892, 1893-1895, 1897-1899 M595 Rolls 399-400 Apache, Mohave, and Yuma Film Drawer 63 San Carlos: 1887-1890, 1892-1902, 1904-1912, 1914-1939 M595 Rolls 461-470 Shivwits or Shebits and Kaibab, Ute and Jicarilla Apache Film Drawer 64 Southern Utah: 1897-1905; Southern Ute: 1885-1892 M595
  • Oregon and California National Historic Trails

    Oregon and California National Historic Trails

    National Park Service National Trails Intermountain Region News U.S. Department of the Interior Oregon and California National Historic Trails Horseshoe Spring Crossroads Chapter - California National Historic Trail Oregon-California Trails Association Hastings Cutoff National Trails System Bureau of Land Management National Park Service What’s New? Spring 2011 Department of the Interior The Great Emigrant Flood off 1849-1854 We are excited to provide this istorians often compare the 1848 discovery of gold in American Indians especiallyly susufferedffered ffromrom the streaminstreamingg HCalifornia to the effect high octane fuel has on a fire. onslaught of “forty-niners”” across the western landscape. For update on activities since OCTA’s Within the next few years more than 250,000 gold-seekers centuries, native peoples hadad lived in the West and farmers scrambled across the Sierra-Nevada in search of without outside competitionon fforor fortune or a new life. resources. However, the floodood ooff last meeting in August 2010 in pioneers and the additionalal The road to California was not a single route. It followed rivalry for food sources, the established Oregon Trail to Fort Bridger before splitting land, water, and Elko, Nevada. either toward Salt Lake City or to Fort Hall, and eventually space threatened to the Sierra-Nevada, where it further split into several interior destroy their way of life. valley destinations. One of the routes through Utah, known as the Hastings Cutoff, rejoined the main California Trail at the Wagon ruts and traces can Humboldt River in northeastern Nevada. still be found in the vast undeveloped West — Travel conditions on the cutoff during most years were reminders of the triumphs,, generally harsh.
  • Great Basin Region Revised 2020

    Great Basin Region Revised 2020

    Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History Repatriation Office Case Report Summaries Great Basin Region Revised 2020 Great Basin Bannock, 1992 INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT OF NATIVE AMERICAN HUMAN Paiute, REMAINS FROM THE WESTERN GREAT BASIN, NEVADA Shoshone, SECTOR, IN THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Washoe This is the first of two reports that will document the human remains in the National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) from the Great Basin region. This report focuses on the western half of the Great Basin, providing an inventory and assessment of the skeletal remains in the museum from the region circumscribed by the modern political boundaries of the state of Nevada. Documentation of the human remains from the western Great Basin was initiated in November 1991 in response to an earlier request from the Pyramid Lake Paiute of northwestern Nevada for the return of any historic Paiute skeletal remains and associated artifacts from their territory. In addition to the Pyramid Lake Paiute, other native peoples potentially affected by the findings of this report include other sub-groups of the Northern Paiute, the Shoshone, the Bannock, and the Southern Paiute. A total of 56 sets of remains in the Physical Anthropology division of the NMNH were identified as having come from the western half of the Great Basin, which is defined for purposes of this report as the state of Nevada. Forty of these skeletal lots were determined to date to the historic period, while 16 sets of remains are prehistoric in origin. In compliance with Public Law 101-185, these remains were evaluated in terms of their probable cultural affiliation.
  • Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Escalante Valley Solar Energy Zone

    Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Escalante Valley Solar Energy Zone

    Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Escalante Valley Solar Energy Zone Participating Tribes Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Ibapah, Utah Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, Cedar City, Utah Ethnography and Ethnographic Synthesis For Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Solar Energy Study Areas in Portions of Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah By Richard W. Stoffle Kathleen A. Van Vlack Hannah Z. Johnson Phillip T. Dukes Stephanie C. De Sola Kristen L. Simmons Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology School of Anthropology University of Arizona October 2011 Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 1 ESCALANTE VALLEY The proposed Escalante Valley solar energy zone (SEZ) is located in Iron County, Utah (Figure 1). It is approximately four miles south of Lund, Utah and ten miles east of Beryl, Utah. The SEZ is situated in the Escalante Valley, which is a large, southwest-northeast trending valley in the south-central portion of the Escalante Desert. Figure 1 Google Earth Image of the Escalante Valley SEZ Outlined in Red and SEZ American Indian Study Area The Escalante Valley SEZ American Indian study area extends beyond the boundaries of the SEZ because of the existence of cultural resources in the surrounding landscape. The Escalante Valley SEZ American Indian study area includes plant and animal communities, geological features, water sources, historic events and the trails that would have connected these features. Southern Paiute and Goshute representatives maintain that, in order to understand Numic connections to the SEZ, it must be placed in context with neighboring connected places including the Milford Flats South and Wah Wah Valley SEZs and their associated cultural resources found in the larger study areas.
  • Li .. FISH SPRINGS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Dugway, Utah

    Li .. FISH SPRINGS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Dugway, Utah

    li .. FISH SPRINGS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Dugway, Utah ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1985 U. S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEW AND APPROVALS FISH SPRINGS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Dugway, Utah ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1985 Refuge Manager--. Date Refuge Supervisor Review Date Regional Office Approval Date INTRODUCTION Fish Springs National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1959 at the southern end of the Great Salt Lake Desert in western Utah. It encom­ passes 17,992 acres between two small mountain ranges. Warm, saline springs flow from the base of the Fish Springs mountains to supply water for a 10,000 acre marsh. It is located in Juab County, 78 miles northwest of Delta and 105 miles west and south of Tooele. Postal and commissary services are available at Dugway Proving Ground, a military base, 52 miles northeast of the refuge. There is evidence of continued Indian use of the area before the 19th century. Jedediah Smith visited the area in 1827. The Central Over­ land Stage, Pony Express, transcontinental telegraph, and Lincoln High­ way followed within less than 100 years and left their marks within the present refuge boundary. The native Utah chub inhabits the warm springs and the small fish is apparently responsible for the name of the area. The small gambusia mosquito fish was introduced just prior to acquisition. There are no other fish species present. The refuge was established for the primary purpose to provide a water­ fowl nesting and resting area in the Pacific Flyway. Five major springs and several lesser ones flow from the base of the eastern front of the Fish Springs Range.
  • A Route for the Overland Stage

    A Route for the Overland Stage

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2008 A Route for the Overland Stage Jesse G. Petersen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Part of the Creative Writing Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Petersen, J. G. (2008). A route for the overland stage: James H. Simpson's 1859 trail across the Great Basin. Logan: Utah State University Press. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 6693-6_OverlandStageCVR.ai93-6_OverlandStageCVR.ai 5/20/085/20/08 10:49:4010:49:40 AMAM C M Y CM MY CY CMY K A Route for the Overland Stage Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. Colonel James H. Simpson shown during his Civil War service as an offi cer of the Fourth New Jersey infantry. A Route for the Overland Stage James H. Simpson’s 1859 Trail Across the Great Basin Jesse G. Petersen Foreword by David L. Bigler Utah State University Press Logan, Utah Copyright ©2008 Utah State University Press All rights reserved Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322-7800 www.usu.edu/usupress Manufactured in the United States of America Printed on recycled, acid-free paper ISBN: 978-0-87421-693-6 (paper) ISBN: 978-0-87421-694-3 (e-book) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Petersen, Jesse G.