Download The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download The á P ub lic P o licy an d Native Americans in Nort h Caro lina: Issues for the '80s Conference Proceedings Edited by Susan M. Presti Published by the North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research, Inc. Board of Directors Thad L. Beyle, Chairman Virginia Ann Foxx, Vice Chairman Walter DeVries, Secretary V. B. (Hawk) Johnson, Treasurer Thomas L. Barringer Daniel T. Blue, Jr. James S. Ferguson Charles Z. Flack, Jr. Joel L. Fleishman Karen E. Gottovi R. Darrell Hancock William G. Hancock, Jr. Watts Hill, Jr. Mary Hopper SandraL. Johnson Walter T. Johnson, Jr. Betty Ann Knudsen Thelma Lennon Hugh Morton Roy Parker, Jr. Donald D. Pollock Betty Chafin Rash Grace Rohrer McNeill Smith Robert W. Spearman Alfred W. Stuart Patricia H. Wagner Alfreda Webb Harrison Wellford Cameron West Betty H. Wiser Copyright 1981 by the North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research, 336 Fayetteville Street Mall, Room 412, Post Office Box 430, Raleigh, N.C. 27602. Typesetting by SeledIype; printing by Theo Davis Sons, Inc. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the individual members of the Center's Board of Directors. TABLE OF CONTENTS Conference Program ii Executive Summary 1 Keynote Address 4 Education 10 Health 26 Luncheon Address 45 Recognition 49 Economic Status 65 Conference Conclusions and Recommendations 82 Appendices 88 PREFACE On April 24, 1981 the North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research sponsored a conference, "Public Policy and Native Americans in North Carolina: Issues for the '80s," which focused on the subjects of health, education, recognition, and economic status. The conference brought together approximately 100 Indians, policymakers, educators, and members of the press to discuss the effects of existing policies on Indians, how such policies could be made more responsive to the needs of Indians, and how policies could be initiated to better address problems of special importance to native Americans. Each panel session included panelist presentations and open discussions. This document reports the proceedings of the conference. The presentations of each panelist, as they appear in this text, have been edited to make them more readable, not to distort their meaning in any way. Following the presentations are summaries of the discussions held in the panel sessions. The final chapter provides a summary of the major points and recommendations that emerged from the conference. Also included are the remarks given by Adolph Dial in reaction to the general tenor and substance of the conference. Both the conference and this publication were funded in part by a grant from the North Carolina Humanities Committee, a state-based program of the National Endowment for the Humanities. i CONFERENCE PROGRAM 8:45 REGISTRATION 9:15 INTRODUCTORY SESSION Keynote Address: Adolph Dial, Chairman, Department of American Indian Studies, Pembroke State University 10:15 EDUCATION HEALTH Betty Mangum , Director, Division of Cherry Beasley , Professor, University Indian Education, N.C. Department of Tennessee College of Nursing of Public Instruction Carolyn Emanuel , Executive Director, Arnold Richardson , Economic Develop- Pembroke Medical Services ment Specialist, Haliwa-Saponi Wes Halsey, Chief of Urban Programs, Tribe, Inc. Division of Indian Community Helen Scheirbeck , Director of Program Development, U.S. Indian Health Development, White House Conference Service for Children and Youth; Project Co- Ronald Levine , Deputy Director, Division ordinator, Indian Information Project of Health Services, N.C. Department Joyce Wasdell , Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources for Instruction, Durham County Moderator: William Flash , Professor, Schools School of Public Health, University of Moderator: Earl Oxendine , Director of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Compensatory Education, Hoke County Schools; member, State Board of Education 12:15 LUNCHEON Luncheon Address: James Abourezk , former U.S. Senator and Chairman, American Indian Policy Review Commission 2:00 RECOGNITION ECONOMIC STATUS Jeanne Chastain , Lumbee River Legal Norman DeWeaver, Economic Develop- Services ment Specialist, Center for Community Jo Jo Hunt , U.S. Senate Select Com- Change mittee on Indian Affairs Kenneth Maynor , Executive Director, Arlinda Locklear , Native American Guilford Native American Association Rights Fund Gary Shope, Director, Small Community Horace Locklear , N.C. State Repre- Economic Development, N.C. Depart- sentative (Robeson County) ment of Commerce Moderator: Sandra Wurth- Hough, Moderator: John G. Peck, Professor, Professor, Department of Political Department of Sociology and Anthro- Science, East Carolina University pology, North Carolina State University 3:40 PLENARY SESSION Summations: Panel Moderators Reaction: Adolph Dial 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The conference on "Public Policy and Native Americans in North Carolina: Issues for the '80s" examined many of the problems facing the state's Indians in the areas of education, health, economic status and recognition, and proposed remedial actions for some of the most pressing problems. In the area of education, Indians often perform poorly in school and frequently end their educations before completing high school. The discrimination many Indians encounter from teachers, administrators, and students does little to encourage them to continue their educations or to improve their educational performance. The conference participants agreed that, in order to enhance the educational environment for Indian students, teachers and administrators must demonstrate more respect for and understanding of Indian students. In addition, multi-ethnic studies, an essential ingredient for a complete education, must no longer be denigrated to the role of the mini-course. Minority education units must be integrated into the social studies and language arts curricula at all grade levels. Before this can happen, however, the conference participants agreed that Indians and other minorities must work to develop appropriate instructional materials, since existing textbooks frequently distort the history and culture of minorities. In the area of health, the North Carolina Indian fares more poorly than does his white counterpart. Although accurate statistics are difficult to obtain (because the 1970 Census grossly undercounted the North Carolina Indian population), it appears that North Carolina's Indian population has at least a 30 percent higher incidence of the following maladies than does the general North Carolina population: leukemia, arteriosclerosis, diabetes, kidney disease, motor vehicle and other accidents, and homicides. The Indian's health problems are compounded by his rurality (83 percent of the state's 1970 Indian population lived in rural areas) and his failure to utilize existing health services, especially those offered by the county health departments. This underutilization is the result of a number of factors. Indians are often unaware of the services available to them, too poor to pay for such services, unable to find transportation to health departments, and - perhaps most importantly - suspicious of the health providers' attitudes towards Indians. For their part, health department staffs frequently do not employ Indian personnel, are unaware of the number of Indians in their area, do not conduct effective outreach efforts to inform Indians of available health services, and harbor prejudicial attitudes towards Indians. The Indian's heritage and life-style provide him with a number of strengths upon which he can draw to improve his health status, among them his extended family support system, holistic view of health, and the ever increasing number of Indian health professionals. The conference participants feel that Indians will need to build on these strengths if they are to improve their chances of leading long and healthy lives. Similarly, Indians will have to draw on local resources and local capital to improve their socioeconomic status in the future. Although most Indians have traditionally farmed, more and more are being forced to abandon their small landholdings. Because of their low levels of education and their rural backgrounds, Indians lack the rudimentary skills necessary to secure and maintain high- paying jobs. Migrating Indians also face numerous difficulties in adjusting to the depersonalized atmosphere of cities. 1 Indians have formed a number of organizations, or Indian centers, to help address the socioeconomic needs of native Americans. These centers, such as the Guilford Native American Association and the Lumbee Regional Development Association, have worked to improve the Indian's economic opportunities, help native Americans gain access to social welfare programs, and provide a supportive atmosphere for Indians alienated from the majority society that surrounds them. These centers, however, have survived largely on federal funding and will have to develop self-sustaining, locally initiated programs if they are to continue in the future. Perhaps no other issue is as emotion-laden for North Carolina's Indians as the subject of recognition. Inconsistent policies at the state and federal levels have left many Indian tribes in this state unrecognized by either the federal or state governments. This has meant that North Carolina's Indians have lost millions of dollars in federal programs designed for federally or state recognized tribes. Recently, however, both the United States and North Carolina have attempted to clarify their recognition processes. At the federal
Recommended publications
  • HON. JESSE HELMS ÷ Z 1921–2008
    im Line) HON. JESSE HELMS ÷z 1921–2008 VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:01 May 15, 2009 Jkt 043500 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6686 Sfmt 6686 H:\DOCS\HELMS\43500.TXT CRS2 PsN: SKAYNE VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:01 May 15, 2009 Jkt 043500 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6686 Sfmt 6686 H:\DOCS\HELMS\43500.TXT CRS2 PsN: SKAYNE (Trim Line) (Trim Line) Jesse Helms LATE A SENATOR FROM NORTH CAROLINA MEMORIAL ADDRESSES AND OTHER TRIBUTES IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES E PL UR UM IB N U U S VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:01 May 15, 2009 Jkt 043500 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 H:\DOCS\HELMS\43500.TXT CRS2 PsN: SKAYNE congress.#15 (Trim Line) (Trim Line) Courtesy U.S. Senate Historical Office Jesse Helms VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:01 May 15, 2009 Jkt 043500 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6688 H:\DOCS\HELMS\43500.TXT CRS2 PsN: SKAYNE 43500.002 (Trim Line) (Trim Line) S. DOC. 110–16 Memorial Addresses and Other Tributes HELD IN THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES TOGETHER WITH A MEMORIAL SERVICE IN HONOR OF JESSE HELMS Late a Senator from North Carolina One Hundred Tenth Congress Second Session ÷ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2009 VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:01 May 15, 2009 Jkt 043500 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6686 H:\DOCS\HELMS\43500.TXT CRS2 PsN: SKAYNE (Trim Line) (Trim Line) Compiled under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:01 May 15, 2009 Jkt 043500 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 H:\DOCS\HELMS\43500.TXT CRS2 PsN: SKAYNE (Trim Line) (Trim Line) CONTENTS Page Biography .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesse Young Voting Record
    Jesse Young Voting Record Manish purchase healthily while intravascular Costa overvalue disregarding or ricks peaceably. Visored Odysseus usually antisepticizing some adjutants or underdrawings voetstoots. Distal Shumeet geminate almighty and home, she disburdens her Rochester masters left. Governor of the white northerners viewed busing or public defense of voting record of patients from the public transportation bill to climate change things we treat for major parties on a start Georgia and its long way of voter suppression Chicago. Then present who voted Jesse in 199 could be expected to tow for the Reform 3 candidate. She also cited record turnout in some offer today's contests. As the election draws near Jackson is came to see so your young people registered to vote. Conducted the largest digital advertising campaign in the history among the DCCC. View Jesse Young's Background history Record Information. Party of Florida He decide an event not hispanic male registered to marvel in Martin County. Comparing Jesse L Jackson Jr's Voting Record News Apps. Endorsements Vote Jesse Johnson. Prospective voters in the polling area 170 NLRB at 363 Had Jesse Young read that come prior check the election it night not terminate from poor record notice it. Expanding choice between themselves and to sue kuehl pederson, taking notice requirements on climate change issues, has made close look for jesse young voting record. Jesse Ferguson Consultant & Democratic Strategist Jesse. Where say the Jesse Voter Gone Creighton University. Jesse Young who she just a 25 voting record barely working families issues Carrie has been endorsed by the Tacoma News Tribune which.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks for Vice President Joe Biden Soles Lecture, University of Delaware 9.16.2011
    Remarks for Vice President Joe Biden Soles Lecture, University of Delaware 9.16.2011 Dr. Harker, it is an honor to be back on the campus that played such a role in shaping my life. During my years on campus, some of the most transformative events of my generation took place. It was here that I listened to JFK warn us of an impending showdown with Russia during the Cuban Missile Crisis. One year and one month later, standing on the steps of Hullihen Hall, I learned of his death. With my friends in the lounge at Harter Hall, I remember debating the drumbeat of impending war in Vietnam. When I came back here in 1972 as a 29 year-old candidate for the US Senate – embraced by my old faculty and supported by my university, I said: “Our failure… has not been the failure of the people to meet the challenges placed before them, but rather the failure of both our great political parties to place those challenges honestly and courageously before the people.” I was unaware that my career would play out against the most extraordinary period of change in American history. The great Irish poet Yeats once described his country with a phrase that I think describes America today – he wrote “All is changed, changed utterly; a terrible beauty has been born.” That was driven home starkly when I was asked by President Roselle to address the student body at “The Bob” one week after the attacks of September 11th. At the time, I said, we “will not… cannot… must not change our way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Funk, Sherman M
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project SHERMAN M. FUNK Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: July 14, 1994 Copyright 201 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in Ne York US Army, WWII Army Specialized Training Program Wounded Prisoner of War Teacher, Fort Yukon, Alaska Harvard University Classmates Finances )p.7, Columbia University Work in father.s toy manufacturing business Marriage 0arly professional career Catskill, Ne York1 Teacher University of Arizona1 Teacher of 2overnment Arizona history class Student body Faculty Sputnik Washington, DC1 United States Air Force 145871470 Management Intern Program 09amination 2overnment7 ide Operations State Department Logistic War Plans Ballistic Missile Program Money aste President Johnson.s Cost Reduction Program 1 President Ni9on Black Capitalism Program Washington, DC1 The White House; Office of Minority Business, 147071481 Assistant Director for Planning and 0valuation Operations Minority franchises Congressional interest Black caucus FBI Inspector 2eneral Act, 1478 Background Billie Sol 0stes Department of Agriculture White House objections D2 appointment by President Function, po ers and authority Inspector 2eneral of the Department of Commerce 148171487 Appointment Operations Justice Department International Narcotics Census Bureau Administration change Foreign Commercial Service Audit Intervie s at State Department Trade and diplomatic activity Personal relations ith White House Claiborne Pell AS0AN
    [Show full text]
  • Withdrawing from Congressional- Executive Agreements with the Advice and Consent of Congress
    WITHDRAWING FROM CONGRESSIONAL- EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS WITH THE ADVICE AND CONSENT OF CONGRESS Abigail L. Sia* As President Donald J. Trump withdrew the United States from one international agreement after another, many began to question whether these withdrawals required congressional approval. The answer may depend on the type of agreement. Based on history and custom, it appears that the president may unilaterally withdraw from agreements concluded pursuant to the treaty process outlined in the U.S. Constitution. However, the United States also has a long history of concluding international agreements as congressional-executive agreements, which use a different approval process that does not appear in the Constitution. But while academics have spilled ink on Article II treaties for decades, the congressional-executive agreement has received relatively little attention. It is neither clear nor well settled whether the president has the constitutional authority to withdraw unilaterally from this type of agreement. This Note proposes applying Justice Robert H. Jackson’s tripartite framework, first articulated in a concurring opinion to Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (Steel Seizure), to determine whether or not a president may constitutionally withdraw from a congressional-executive agreement without Congress’s consent. However, in certain dire emergency situations or when Congress is physically unable to convene and vote, the president should be permitted to eschew the framework and withdraw the United States from a congressional-executive agreement without waiting for Congress’s consent—so long as the president reasonably believes that withdrawal is in the country’s best interest. To support this approach, this Note also calls for a new reporting statute, similar in structure to the War Powers Resolution, to address the significant information asymmetries between the executive and legislative branches.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • When African-Americans Were Republicans in North Carolina, the Target of Suppressive Laws Was Black Republicans. Now That They
    When African-Americans Were Republicans in North Carolina, The Target of Suppressive Laws Was Black Republicans. Now That They Are Democrats, The Target Is Black Democrats. The Constant Is Race. A Report for League of Women Voters v. North Carolina By J. Morgan Kousser Table of Contents Section Title Page Number I. Aims and Methods 3 II. Abstract of Findings 3 III. Credentials 6 IV. A Short History of Racial Discrimination in North Carolina Politics A. The First Disfranchisement 8 B. Election Laws and White Supremacy in the Post-Civil War South 8 C. The Legacy of White Political Supremacy Hung on Longer in North Carolina than in Other States of the “Rim South” 13 V. Democratizing North Carolina Election Law and Increasing Turnout, 1995-2009 A. What Provoked H.B. 589? The Effects of Changes in Election Laws Before 2010 17 B. The Intent and Effect of Election Laws Must Be Judged by their Context 1. The First Early Voting Bill, 1993 23 2. No-Excuse Absentee Voting, 1995-97 24 3. Early Voting Launched, 1999-2001 25 4. An Instructive Incident and Out-of-Precinct Voting, 2005 27 5. A Fair and Open Process: Same-Day Registration, 2007 30 6. Bipartisan Consensus on 16-17-Year-Old-Preregistration, 2009 33 VI. Voter ID and the Restriction of Early Voting: The Preview, 2011 A. Constraints 34 B. In the Wings 34 C. Center Stage: Voter ID 35 VII. H.B. 589 Before and After Shelby County A. Process Reveals Intention 37 B. Facts 1. The Extent of Fraud 39 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesse Helms Part 07 of 07
    I , FD-36Q.» RSV.B-26-82! <Q>® 7 FBI &#39;:_ , TFIANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: I11 Teletype Immediate III TOPSECRET El Facsimile [XL Priority E] SECRET III iii I] Routine III CONFIDENTIAL III UNCLAS E F T O IX] UNCLAS Date We 93/ Z FM wnsnznemon FIELD l75NEW! P! TO ,DIRECTOR,FBI PRIORITY!¬%%$>92_ BT UNCLAS UNSUB,BLACK AKA ISMMTHREAT , THE PRESIDENT AGAINST ASSISTANTOF SECRETARY STATE[::::::::;:::fi::]SENATOR JESSE b6 §§pM§vxcwxms, - FOO?/§26§TS,CI§NTf,INC._AND SAFEWAY b/C PI VICTIMS, PPSAKA;CCSCAKA, EXTORTION,TCP, OO: WASHINGTON FIELD FOR THEINFORMATION THE OF BUREAU,[:::::::::::]SUMMER INTERN, WJLA-TV, ABC AFFILIATE , 4433 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W. , WASHINGTOND , .C . WDC!f , TELEPHONENUMBER 364-7715, ADVISED THATAT APPROXIMATELYlO:092OON AUGUST 5,A.M. 1985,£/ HE REGA-BLEDA CALL OF THE NEWS ROOMFROM AN INDIVIDUAL WHOS IDENTIFIED HIMSELF AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BLACK ISLAMIC JIHAD. THIS INDIVIDUAL STATEDTHAT HADA STATEMENT TO I UJNKUQ@;Wmo 64&#39;I §nT6FArCII I TI3B:sgt$"ék! 1%/L/n/92@f!II>W92¢3<fL6>9235DJU 8%IQI / 9275/$»~ Approved:I V I umber!/ e!M NIT, P:,!_»»:;:»__;_I- I I FD-36 Rev. a-2s-a2! FBI $ TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: III Teletype III Immediate III TOP SECRET EI Facsimile III Priority III SECRET U ___i____ CI Routine III CONFIDENTIAL III UNCLAS E F T O III UNCLAS Date PAGE TWO DE WF #0007 UNCLAS READ WHICH WAS AS FOLLOWS: "IF BY SUNDAY, AUGUST ll, 1985 I THE STATE QF EMERGENCY IN SOUTH AFRICA IS NOT LIFTED THERE WILL BE A HOLOCOSTIN WHITE AMERICA INTHE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REPUBLICAN PARTY's MARCH to the RIGHT Cliff Checs Ter
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 29 | Number 4 Article 13 2002 EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT Cliff checS ter Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Accounting Law Commons Recommended Citation Cliff cheS cter, EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT, 29 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1663 (2002). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol29/iss4/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT Cover Page Footnote Cliff cheS cter is a political consultant and public affairs writer. Cliff asw initially a frustrated Rockefeller Republican who now casts his lot with the New Democratic Movement of the Democratic Party. This article is available in Fordham Urban Law Journal: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol29/iss4/13 EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT by Cliff Schecter* 1. STILL A ROCK PARTY In the 2000 film The Contender, Senator Lane Hanson, por- trayed by Joan Allen, explains what catalyzed her switch from the Grand Old Party ("GOP") to the Democratic side of the aisle. During her dramatic Senate confirmation hearing for vice-presi- dent, she laments that "The Republican Party had shifted from the ideals I cherished in my youth." She lists those cherished ideals as "a woman's right to choose, taking guns out of every home, campaign finance reform, and the separation of church and state." Although this statement reflects Hollywood's usual penchant for oversimplification, her point con- cerning the recession of moderation in Republican ranks is still ap- ropos.
    [Show full text]