DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Single Sky Implementation LSSIP 2017 - FRANCE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Single Sky Implementation LSSIP 2017 - FRANCE EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - FRANCE Level 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for France Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/18 Date of Edition 24/05/2018 Jean‐Jacques Blanchard ‐ jean‐jacques.blanchard@aviation‐ LSSIP Focal Point civile.gouv.fr LSSIP Contact Person Jorge Pinto – [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/lssip Reference Documents LSSIP Documents http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/lssip LSSIP Guidance http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/lssip Material Master Plan Level http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐ 3 – Plan Edition implementation‐plan 2017 Master Plan Level http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐ 3 – Report Year implementation‐report 2016 European ATM https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ Portal STATFOR http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/statfor Forecasts Acronyms and http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/glossaries abbreviations National AIP https://www.sia.aviation‐civile.gouv.fr/ https://www.fabec.eu/images/user‐pics/pdf‐ FAB Performance downloads/performance_plan/FAB%20EC%20FAB%20RP2%20Performance%20Plan%20b Plan ody_Revised_V3.0_complete%20PDF%20Format.pdf LSSIP Year 2017 France Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan -Edition 2017 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). Stakeholder/ Name Position Signature Organisation Directi�n du Transport Marc BOREL Aerien Direction des Services Maurice GEORGES de la Navigation Aerlenne Direction de la BG*• Pierre REUTTER Circulation Aerlenne Militaire LSSIP Year 2017 France Released Issue CONTENTS 1. National ATM Environment ............................................................. 9 1.1. Geographical Scope .............................................................................................9 1.2. National Stakeholders ...................................................................................... 11 2. Traffic and Capacity ....................................................................... 23 2.1. Evolution of traffic in France ............................................................................ 23 2.2. Bordeaux ACC ................................................................................................... 24 2.3. Brest ACC .......................................................................................................... 28 2.4. Marseille ACC ................................................................................................... 31 2.5. Paris ACC ........................................................................................................... 34 2.6. Reims ACC ......................................................................................................... 37 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 40 4. Implementation Projects ............................................................... 41 4.1. National projects .............................................................................................. 41 4.2. FAB projects ..................................................................................................... 53 4.3. Regional projects .............................................................................................. 55 5. Cooperation activities .................................................................... 56 5.1. FAB Co‐ordination ............................................................................................ 56 5.2. Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 56 6. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................. 61 6.1. State View......................................................................................................... 61 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 69 Annexes LSSIP Year 2017 France Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Leading stakeholders involved in ATM in France are the Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of Environment, Energy and the Sea, respectively through French Military Air Traffic Management Directorate (DIRCAM ‐ Direction de la Circulation Aérienne Militaire) and French Civil Aviation Authority (DGAC ‐ Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile). Air Transport Directorate (DTA ‐ Direction du Transport Aérien) and Civil Aviation Safety Directorate (DSAC ‐ Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile), both belonging to DGAC but functionally separated, are defined as national supervisory authorities (NSA) : DTA for charging and performance and DSAC for safety oversight in air navigation services and air traffic management, including in particular changes oversight and interoperability. For services provided to general air traffic, DIRCAM exercises the national supervisory functions within Defence on behalf of DSAC, according to national decrees. Main civil ATM ANSP includes DSNA (Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne), the French air navigation services provider certified and designated for ATM services (as well as for CNS and AIS) and 65 stakeholders, providing Aerodrome Flight Information Service (AFIS) for GAT on 66 aerodromes. In addition seven military ANSPs providing services to general air traffic and covering ATC, CNS and AIS services, are certified in France. Among them four are designated since December 2011 as military air traffic service provider for the benefit of general air traffic. Météo‐France is certified and formally designated as the only one national MET provider since 20th December 2011. Moreover, major airports (Paris Roissy‐CDG, Paris Orly, Nice Côte d’Azur, Lyon Saint Exupéry, Toulouse Blagnac, and Marseille Provence) operators contribute to reporting. France is member state of the FABEC together with Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, The Netherlands and Switzerland. In the course of 2011, two performance plans have been established for the first reference period (2012‐2014) and submitted to the European Commission in compliance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 of 29th July 2010 and agreed according to Commission Recommendation 2012/C 228/01 of 29th July 2012. Those first national and FABEC RP1 performance plans addressed safety, capacity, flight efficiency and military mission effectiveness through complementary Key Performance indicators (KPI, with targets) and Performance Indicators (PI, for monitoring purposes without targets). In addition, the national plan addressed cost efficiency performance indicators. For the 2nd reference period the FABEC Performance Plan for 2015 – 2019 has been delivered to the Commission 30th June 2014 in compliance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 and 391/2013 of 3rd May 2013 ; a first revised version has been submitted 2nd July 2015 and a final one 30th January 2017 is still under assessment. It sets safety, en route and terminal capacity, flight efficiency and cost efficiency targets. There is no more national French performance plan as such, as for RP1 but national chapters of the FABEC performance plan address targets set at national level. More over the DSAC is involved in the agreement on the cooperation of the FABEC national supervisory authorities and a manual for their common activities of has been issued in 2012. LSSIP Year 2017 France 1 Released Issue Traffic and Capacity Traffic in France increased by 4 % during summer 2017 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2016. Regarding the 2018‐2023 period the STATFOR medium‐term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual increase between 0.3% and 3.5% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.0%. Regarding the current capacity plan of 5 French ACC between 2018 and 2022: - Bordeaux ACC: a small capacity gap is expected for 2018 and 2019. - Brest ACC: There will be a capacity gap in Brest ACC in 2018 and 2019. The traffic increase in Brest ACC was high in 2017 (+7.6%), and the high capacity increase of 10% was not sufficient to close the capacity gap. For 2018, a high traffic increase is expected, and the planned capacity increase of +12% will not be sufficient to close the capacity gap. - Marseille ACC: the current capacity gap should be closed in 2019. The capacity increases in 2018 and 2019 should mainly come from the flexible rostering implementation. The national agreement is validated, and the local agreement is under negotiation. - Paris ACC: no capacity gap is expected for the planning period. - Reims ACC: a capacity gap is expected in Reims in 2018 and 2019. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase. Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aviation Finance & Leasing
    GETTING THROUGH THE DEAL Aviation Finance & Leasing Aviation Finance & Leasing Finance Aviation Contributing editor Mark Bisset 2017 2017 © Law Business Research 2017 Aviation Finance & Leasing 2017 Contributing editor Mark Bisset Clyde & Co LLP Publisher Law The information provided in this publication is Gideon Roberton general and may not apply in a specific situation. [email protected] Business Legal advice should always be sought before taking Research any legal action based on the information provided. Subscriptions This information is not intended to create, nor does Sophie Pallier Published by receipt of it constitute, a lawyer–client relationship. [email protected] Law Business Research Ltd The publishers and authors accept no responsibility 87 Lancaster Road for any acts or omissions contained herein. The Senior business development managers London, W11 1QQ, UK information provided was verified between May and Alan Lee Tel: +44 20 3708 4199 June 2017. Be advised that this is a developing area. [email protected] Fax: +44 20 7229 6910 Adam Sargent © Law Business Research Ltd 2017 Printed and distributed by [email protected] No photocopying without a CLA licence. Encompass Print Solutions First published 2014 Tel: 0844 2480 112 Dan White Fourth edition [email protected] ISSN 2055-7256 © Law Business Research 2017 CONTENTS Global overview 5 Japan 87 Mark Bisset Katsu Sengoku and Kentaro Miyagi Clyde & Co LLP Nishimura & Asahi Aircraft operating
    [Show full text]
  • FRANCE LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview
    LSSIP 2020 - FRANCE LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for France Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/63 Date of Edition 17/03/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Stéphane Lafourcade - DGAC [email protected] LSSIP Contact Person Goran Pavlović - EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS [email protected] LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://www.sia.aviation-civile.gouv.fr/ FAB Performance Plan https://www.fabec.eu/performance/performance-plan LSSIP Year 2020 France Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. Organisation Name Signature Direction du Transport Aérien Marc BOREL Direction des Services de la Maurice GEORGES Navigation Aérienne Direction de la Circulation BG** Etienne Aérienne Militaire HERFELD LSSIP Year 2020 France Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A to My Wife and Children
    A To my wife and children ProQuest Number: 10673044 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10673044 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 POLITICS AND ASPECTS OF L\<6H<\'s THE DEVELOPMENT OF .AIK TRANSPORT SYSTEMS 'TR 13=©^: A GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS AMIN BASHIR DAABAJ MARGHANI Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies. u-'X i ABSTRACT The aim of this thesis is to analyse the developments of Libya's air transport systems and infrastructures by analysing the evolution of these spatial organisations. Certain underlying factors are examined in order to ex­ plain these developments including the political ele­ ment influencing the changing flows in, and structures of, the networks. The Study emphasises the need to ex­ amine similar systems in other developing countries in the light of internal political forces, and the impact of the policies of the major suppliers of air transport technology. The Preface defines the subject matter ana methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Data, Data Analysis and Recommendation on Collection of Data in the Field of General Aviation in Europe
    RCHIVE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT STATISTICAL DATA, DATA ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION ON COLLECTION OF DATA IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL AVIATION IN EUROPE FINAL REPORT WORK ORDER: MOVE/E4/SER/2014-757 DECEMBER 2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT STATISTICAL DATA, DATA ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION ON COLLECTION OF DATA IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL AVIATION IN EUROPE FINAL REPORT WORK ORDER: MOVE/E4/SER/2014-757 DECEMBER 2015 STATISTICAL DATA, DATA ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATUION ON COLLECTION OF DATA IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL AVIATION IN EUROPE CONTENTS List of acronyms 1 1 Executive Summary 4 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Methodology developed for the study 5 1.3 Availability of data 6 1.4 Main findings 7 1.5 Main recommendations 8 1.6 Conclusion 10 2 Introduction 11 2.1 Objectives of the study 12 2.2 Domains covered by the data analysis 12 2.3 Scope of the report 13 2.4 Document structure 13 3 Methodology to conduct the study 14 3.1 Overall Methodology 14 3.2 Methodology for data collection 14 3.3 Methodology for data analysis 20 3.4 Methodology for database development 21 4 Data availability and quality 24 4.1 Statistics related to air safety 24 4.2 Economic data 26 4.3 Environment data 28 4.4 Summary of data available 29 4.5 Cost/effort of data collection 30 5 Main findings 32 5.1 Overview of GA in Europe 32 5.2 Safety related data 33 5.3 Economic analysis 40 5.4 Environment 42 5.5 Issues identified 44 6 Recommendations 47 6.1 Recommendations regarding data collection 47 6 STATISTICAL DATA, DATA ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATUION
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report 2019
    Activity Report 2019 French civil aviation safety directorate National oversight authority Ministry of Ecology Transition www.ecologie.gouv.fr foreword by Patrick Cipriani French Civil Aviation Safety Director Contents At the time of publication of this report, As you will discover throughout this report, the the world is having to confront the COVID-19 theme of this tenth year was modernisation Highlights ................................................................................ 2 pandemic. through the launch of the METEOR application, which unifies and simplifies exchanges between Results of the 2018-2019 satisfaction survey This crisis of exceptional magnitude and DSAC and its partners and operators, as well as conducted with operators ...................................................... 3 consequences, is hitting domestic aviation very mainly European regulatory action in which hard: the sector is experiencing historically low DSAC plays a major role. Assessing and improving safety ............................................. 4 traffic and prospects for a return to normal are low, given that signs of fragility could already Another theme of 2019 was drones, with the be seen in the pre-crisis context. DSAC supports publication of the new European regulatory Resource management ........................................................... 6 companies in the domestic aviation sector by framework for aircraft and operations and making derogations to allow private flights or the development in France of increasingly European cooperation and safety regulations ........................ 10 extraordinary use, strengthen the resilience of varied uses. DSAC is supporting the sector in its players during this period of low activity and transition towards this new framework, which Aircrews .................................................................................. 14 facilitate the subsequent recovery. It adapts its is inspired by our national framework and for oversight methods without ever losing sight of its which France has been a frontrunner.
    [Show full text]
  • Cahier De La
    Air Security of the Homeland in 2030 Benoît D’A BOVILLE , ADER7 Extract from the ADER working group report, January 2019. (1) he growth of air traffic in Europe has direct implications on overflights of our territory, making adaptation of our current structures for controlling airspace T more urgent. The common objective of the Single European Sky (SES) is the defragmentation of national airspaces and optimisation of air pathways, both civil and military. Future management of the Permanent security posture ( Posture permanente de sécurité —PPS ), which is the responsibility of the Air Force, will inevitably be affected by it and will have to take into account the growing threats from drones and terrorism. To respond to these issues, a new ‘policy for the sky’ needs to be established, which includes space aspects as well as those arising from the new arrangements for air traf - fic management to be effective by 2025. The Permanent security posture—a developing mission for the Air Force The Permanent security posture is a mission for military aviation and is essential for the air security of our territory. It is a truly permanent function, and a demanding one too, operating 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, wholly operationally and financially undertaken by the Air Force in collaboration with the Directorate general of civil avia - tion ( Direction générale de l’aviation civile —DGAC ). It is extremely reactive, able to respond to the requirement of rapid decision-making and to obtain in a very short time the political authorisation to act, including from the level of the Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • FRANCE Local Single Sky Implementation Level 1 - Implementation Overview
    of ATM Implementation Reporting EUROCONTROL 25YEARS in Europe LSSIP 2018 - FRANCE Local Single Sky ImPlementation Level 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2018 for France Infocentre Reference 19/02/05/16 Date of Edition 23/04/19 LSSIP Focal Point Jean-Jacques Blanchard – jean-jacques.blanchard@aviation- civile.gouv.fr LSSIP Contact Person Jorge Pinto – [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip Reference Documents LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip LSSIP Guidance http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip Material Master Plan Level 3 – http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3- Plan Edition 2018 implementation-plan Master Plan Level 3 – http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3- Report Year 2018 implementation-report European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor Acronyms and https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official- abbreviations documents/guidance/Glossaries.pdf National AIP https://www.sia.aviation-civile.gouv.fr/ LSSIP Year 2018 France Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2018 document and their signature confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aviation
    ^»Wr.«lli»Hiltei.M.IWii»MiLhl DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: T|lil™ilPw ^^mm^'10^' Jip-"W * "WWW Approved for Public Release ■ Distribution Unlimited Military Aviation Air University Press Team Chief Editor Emily Adams Copy Editor Lula Barnes Cover Art and Book Design Steven C. Garst Composition and Prepress Production Maty P. Ferguson Quality Review Joan Dawson Print Preparation Joan Hickey Distribution Diane Clark Military Aviation by CLEMENT ADER Edited and Translated by LEE KENNETT Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama July 2003 20030929 092 Air University Library Cataloging Data Ader, Clement, 1841-1925. Military aviation / by Clement Ader ; edited and translated by Lee Kennett. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references. Originally published Paris : Berger-Levrault, 1909. ISBN 1-58566-118-X 1. Aeronautics, Military. 2. Aeronautics, Military—FYance. I. Title. II. Keimett, LeeB. 358.4—dc21 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Air Force, the De- partment of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribu- tion unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil Contents Page DISCLAIMER n ABOUT THE EDITOR AND TRANSLATOR v BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE vii FOREWORD ix ABOUT THE AUTHOR—CLEMENT ADER, 1841-1925 xi THE ORIGINAL BOOK Introduction 3 Letters Cited in the Introduction 13 Note No. 1, Airplanes 19 Note No. 2, Bases 31 Note No. 3, Naval Airplanes 35 Note No. 4, Vertical Artillery 41 Note No. 5, Air Lanes 45 Note No.
    [Show full text]
  • National Oversight Authority
    ACTIVITY REPORT NATIONAL OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY MINISTÈRE DE LA TRANSITION ÉCOLOGIQUE ET SOLIDAIRE www.ecologique-solidaire.gouv.fr DSAC ACTIVITY REPORT FOREWORD CONTENTS 2016: a year of new opportunities The terrorist attacks that struck Brussels and Istanbul airports, The DSAC made a signifi cant contribution to progress regar- and other targets, in 2016, prompted the sector to further ding UAVs, such as the law on UAVs, the preparation of the strengthen its security measures, while air safety continued to future European regulations and the improvement of existing ORGANISATION CHART ........................ 4 improve at the same time. national measures. After 2015, 2016 was the second safest year ever for air travel and The sta at the DSAC worked very hard on the preparation the one of the best years of all time in terms of air safety on a world- future European regulations, with some very positive results, HIGHLIGHTS .......................................... 6 wide scale. From the perspective of technical and operational including the development of the future basic regulation on safety, aviation continues to become an ever safer industry. European air safety, for which France’s position was defended While 2016 did not see a single fatal accident involving passen- with success, or the ongoing work on changes to more de- ASSESSING gers carried by French airlines, on 16 May 2016, French victims tailed regulations. Notable examples include the medical mo- AND IMPROVING SAFETY ...................... 8 perished in the crash of Egyptair fl ight MS804 from Paris-CDG nitoring of pilots mental health in response to the crash of the to Cairo, the causes of which remain unexplained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for Control of American Military Aviation
    THE STRUGGLE FOR CONTROL OF AMERICAN MILITARY AVIATION by PAUL HARRIS LARSON B.A., Auburn University Montgomery, 2000 M.A., Texas State University, 2002 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2016 Abstract The United States Army activated the Aeronautical Division, United States Signal Corps, on August 1, 1907. The men of the Aeronautical Division faced hardships and challenges from the very beginning as they tried to build the nation’s first air force prior to World War I. The U.S. Army, the War Department, Congress, and even the American people, really did not know what aircraft could do beyond simple flight. American airmen tried to demonstrate what air power was capable of, but the response to their achievements never met their expectations. Using an abundance of primary and secondary sources on American air power, this dissertation demonstrates that airmen’s struggle for a separate service was not something that developed slowly over the course of decades. Instead, this dissertation shows that airmen wanted independence from the U.S. Army from the start. From their point of view, the U.S. Army, the War Department, and Congress never really appreciated or understood air power. As a result, airmen became more and more alienated with each passing year until they achieve want they wanted—independence. THE STRUGGLE FOR CONTROL OF AMERICAN MILITARY AVIATION by PAUL HARRIS LARSON B.A., Auburn University Montgomery, 2000 M.A., Texas State University, 2002 A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2016 Approved by: Major Professor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Th June, 2019
    18th – 20th June, 2019 The Royal Danish Embassy in Paris and Danish Aviation Group are pleased to invite you to a 3-day program in France - one of Europe’s largest aviation industries with activities expected to double within the next 20 years. The program will include three days filled with in-depth meetings with opportunities to meet with distributors, agents and important buyers and industry leaders from the largest airports and airlines in France. Tentative programme June 18 • Market briefings by local authorities and experts • Meetings with airport officials and product pitch at Aéroport de Lille • Meetings with airport officials and product pitch at Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport • Dine, learn and network with industry leaders June 19 • Visit to Paris Air Show 2019 • Prepared individual B2B meetings at the show with airports and e.g. airlines • Networking reception at Maison du Danemark June 20 • Meeting with VINCI Airport Group • Additional individual B2B meetings The content of the final program will depend on the interests and characteristics of the companies that sign up. The embassy in Paris will engage in direct dialogue with each participating company to understand their specific interest in the French market. Practical information Price Danish Aviation Group members: 12.935 DKK Non-members: 15.920 DKK For up to two participants per company. The price excludes flights, accommodation and outlays for joint transportation and networking reception. Sign up before 20th April by sending an email to Amalie Albertsen at [email protected]. For more information, contact Michela Berling at [email protected] or Amalie Albertsen at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Aviation Law Review
    The Aviation Law Review Editor Sean Gates Law Business Research The Aviation Law Review Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in The Aviation Law Review,1st edition (published in August 2013 – editor Sean Gates). For further information please email [email protected] The Aviation Law Review Editor Sean Gates Law Business Research Ltd THE LAW REVIEWS THE Mergers AND ACQUISITIONS REVIEW THE RESTRUCTURING REVIEW THE PRIVATE COmpetITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION REVIEW THE EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW THE PUBLIC COmpetITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE BANKING REGULATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION REVIEW THE Merger CONTROL REVIEW THE TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVIEW THE INWARD INVESTMENT AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION REVIEW THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REVIEW THE CORPORATE IMMIGRATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW THE PROJECts AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKets REVIEW THE REAL ESTATE LAW REVIEW THE PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW THE ENergY REGULATION AND MARKets REVIEW THE INTELLECTUAL PROpertY REVIEW THE ASSET MANAGEMENT REVIEW THE PRIVATE WEALTH AND PRIVATE CLIENT REVIEW THE MINING LAW REVIEW THE EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION REVIEW THE ANTi-BRIBERY AND ANTi-CORRUPTION REVIEW THE CArtels AND LENIENCY REVIEW THE TAX DISPUTES AND LITIGATION REVIEW THE LIFE SCIENCES LAW REVIEW THE INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE LAW REVIEW THE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT REVIEW THE DOMINANCE AND MONOPOLIES REVIEW THE AVIATION LAW REVIEW www.TheLawReviews.co.uk
    [Show full text]