EUROCONTROL
Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - FRANCE
Level 1 - Implementation Overview
Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for France
Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/18 Date of Edition 24/05/2018 Jean‐Jacques Blanchard ‐ jean‐jacques.blanchard@aviation‐ LSSIP Focal Point civile.gouv.fr LSSIP Contact Person Jorge Pinto – [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/lssip
Reference
Documents
LSSIP Documents http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/lssip LSSIP Guidance http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/lssip Material Master Plan Level http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐ 3 – Plan Edition implementation‐plan 2017 Master Plan Level http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐ 3 – Report Year implementation‐report 2016 European ATM https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ Portal STATFOR http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/statfor Forecasts Acronyms and http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/glossaries abbreviations National AIP https://www.sia.aviation‐civile.gouv.fr/ https://www.fabec.eu/images/user‐pics/pdf‐ FAB Performance downloads/performance_plan/FAB%20EC%20FAB%20RP2%20Performance%20Plan%20b Plan ody_Revised_V3.0_complete%20PDF%20Format.pdf
LSSIP Year 2017 France Released Issue
APPROVAL SHEET
The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan -Edition 2017 (also known as the ESSIP Plan).
Stakeholder/ Name Position Signature Organisation
Directi�n du Transport Marc BOREL Aerien
Direction des Services Maurice GEORGES de la Navigation Aerlenne
Direction de la BG*• Pierre REUTTER Circulation Aerlenne Militaire
LSSIP Year 2017 France Released Issue
CONTENTS
1. National ATM Environment ...... 9 1.1. Geographical Scope ...... 9 1.2. National Stakeholders ...... 11 2. Traffic and Capacity ...... 23 2.1. Evolution of traffic in France ...... 23 2.2. Bordeaux ACC ...... 24 2.3. Brest ACC ...... 28 2.4. Marseille ACC ...... 31 2.5. Paris ACC ...... 34 2.6. Reims ACC ...... 37 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ...... 40 4. Implementation Projects ...... 41 4.1. National projects ...... 41 4.2. FAB projects ...... 53 4.3. Regional projects ...... 55 5. Cooperation activities ...... 56 5.1. FAB Co‐ordination ...... 56 5.2. Regional cooperation ...... 56 6. Implementation Objectives Progress ...... 61 6.1. State View...... 61 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ...... 69
Annexes
LSSIP Year 2017 France Released Issue
Executive Summary
National ATM Context
Leading stakeholders involved in ATM in France are the Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of Environment, Energy and the Sea, respectively through French Military Air Traffic Management Directorate (DIRCAM ‐ Direction de la Circulation Aérienne Militaire) and French Civil Aviation Authority (DGAC ‐ Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile). Air Transport Directorate (DTA ‐ Direction du Transport Aérien) and Civil Aviation Safety Directorate (DSAC ‐ Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile), both belonging to DGAC but functionally separated, are defined as national supervisory authorities (NSA) : DTA for charging and performance and DSAC for safety oversight in air navigation services and air traffic management, including in particular changes oversight and interoperability. For services provided to general air traffic, DIRCAM exercises the national supervisory functions within Defence on behalf of DSAC, according to national decrees. Main civil ATM ANSP includes DSNA (Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne), the French air navigation services provider certified and designated for ATM services (as well as for CNS and AIS) and 65 stakeholders, providing Aerodrome Flight Information Service (AFIS) for GAT on 66 aerodromes. In addition seven military ANSPs providing services to general air traffic and covering ATC, CNS and AIS services, are certified in France. Among them four are designated since December 2011 as military air traffic service provider for the benefit of general air traffic. Météo‐France is certified and formally designated as the only one national MET provider since 20th December 2011. Moreover, major airports (Paris Roissy‐CDG, Paris Orly, Nice Côte d’Azur, Lyon Saint Exupéry, Toulouse Blagnac, and Marseille Provence) operators contribute to reporting. France is member state of the FABEC together with Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, The Netherlands and Switzerland. In the course of 2011, two performance plans have been established for the first reference period (2012‐2014) and submitted to the European Commission in compliance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 of 29th July 2010 and agreed according to Commission Recommendation 2012/C 228/01 of 29th July 2012. Those first national and FABEC RP1 performance plans addressed safety, capacity, flight efficiency and military mission effectiveness through complementary Key Performance indicators (KPI, with targets) and Performance Indicators (PI, for monitoring purposes without targets). In addition, the national plan addressed cost efficiency performance indicators. For the 2nd reference period the FABEC Performance Plan for 2015 – 2019 has been delivered to the Commission 30th June 2014 in compliance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 and 391/2013 of 3rd May 2013 ; a first revised version has been submitted 2nd July 2015 and a final one 30th January 2017 is still under assessment. It sets safety, en route and terminal capacity, flight efficiency and cost efficiency targets. There is no more national French performance plan as such, as for RP1 but national chapters of the FABEC performance plan address targets set at national level. More over the DSAC is involved in the agreement on the cooperation of the FABEC national supervisory authorities and a manual for their common activities of has been issued in 2012.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 1 Released Issue
Traffic and Capacity
Traffic in France increased by 4 % during summer 2017 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2016. Regarding the 2018‐2023 period the STATFOR medium‐term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual increase between 0.3% and 3.5% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.0%. Regarding the current capacity plan of 5 French ACC between 2018 and 2022: - Bordeaux ACC: a small capacity gap is expected for 2018 and 2019. - Brest ACC: There will be a capacity gap in Brest ACC in 2018 and 2019. The traffic increase in Brest ACC was high in 2017 (+7.6%), and the high capacity increase of 10% was not sufficient to close the capacity gap. For 2018, a high traffic increase is expected, and the planned capacity increase of +12% will not be sufficient to close the capacity gap. - Marseille ACC: the current capacity gap should be closed in 2019. The capacity increases in 2018 and 2019 should mainly come from the flexible rostering implementation. The national agreement is validated, and the local agreement is under negotiation. - Paris ACC: no capacity gap is expected for the planning period. - Reims ACC: a capacity gap is expected in Reims in 2018 and 2019.
Progress per SESAR Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase. Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011‐2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.
Pre‐SESAR 2010 2019 Implementation 82%
PCP 2015 2023 Implementation 41%
LSSIP Year 2017 France 2 Released Issue
Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.
Advanced Air Enabling Aviation Optimised ATM Traffic Services High Performing Infrastructure Network Services Airport Operations
92% 79% 84% 70% 52% 48%
12% 18%
PCP PCP PCP PCP SESAR SESAR SESAR SESAR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Pre Pre Pre Pre
ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6.1.3.
2010 2018 83% Block 0
LSSIP Year 2017 France 3 Released Issue
ATM Deployment Outlook
● State objectives
‐ OAT and GAT handling Deployed in 2016‐2017: [AOM13.1] 100% progress ‐ ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 100% progress ‐ Direct Routing [AOM21.1] 100% progress ‐ Ground‐Based Safety Nets [ATC02.8] 100% progress ‐ Mandatory Coordination & Transfer [ITY‐COTR] 100% progress
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
‐ TCAS II v7.1 ‐ Runway excursions ‐ Surveillance Performance ‐ Aircraft Identification [ATC16] 100% progress [SAF11] 96% progress & Interoperability [ITY‐ACID] 90% progress ‐ STAM Phase 1 ‐ Traffic Complexity [ITY‐SPI] 83% progress ‐ Data Link [FCM04.1] 97% progress [FCM06] 80% progress ‐ Voice over IP [ITY‐AGDL] 81% progress ‐ AMAN to en‐route [COM11] 80% progress ‐ AMAN to further en‐route [ATC15.1] 78% progress ‐ eTOD [ATC15.2] 73% progress ‐ APV Procedures [INF07] 51% progress ‐ ASM/ATFCM process [NAV10] 78% progress [AOM19.3] 70% progress ‐ AMHS ‐ Real‐Time Airspace Data [COM10] 76% progress [AOM19.2] 70% progress ‐ FMTP ‐ MTCD & CORA [ITY‐FMTP] 65% progress [ATC12.1] 36% progress ‐ Collaborative Flight ‐ 8,33 kHz below FL195 Planning [ITY‐AGVCS2] 29% progress [FCM03] 62% progress ‐ Aeronautical Information [ITY‐ADQ] 28% progress ‐ STAM Phase 2 [FCM04.2] 28% progress ‐ Coordination and transfer [ATC17] 25% progress ‐ Free Route Airspace [AOM21.2] 21% progress ‐ Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 17% progress ‐ NewPENS [COM12] 7% progress ‐ Extended Flight Plan [FCM08] 5% progress
LSSIP Year 2017 France 4 Released Issue
● Airport objec ves ‐ LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry
‐ Airport CDM Deployed in 2016‐2017: [AOP05] 100% progress ‐ Initial Airport Operations Plan [AOP11] 100% progress
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
‐ CCOs [ENV03] 80% progress ‐ A‐SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 20% progress
● Airport objec ves ‐ LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur
‐ A‐SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) Deployed in 2016‐2017: [AOP04.2] 100% progress
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
‐ CCOs ‐ Initial Airport Operations [ENV03] 80% progress Plan ‐ Airport CDM [AOP11] 21% progress [AOP05] 70% progress ‐ Airport Safety Nets [AOP12] 5% progress ‐ Surface Movement Planning & Routing [AOP13] 0% progress
● Airport objec ves ‐ LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport
Deployed in 2016‐2017:
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
‐ Remote Tower ‐ Initial Airport Operations ‐ Airport Safety Nets [AOP14] % progress Plan [AOP12] 23% progress ‐ CCOs [AOP11] 30% progress ‐ Surface Movement [ENV03] 80% progress Planning & Routing [AOP13] 0% progress
LSSIP Year 2017 France 5 Released Issue
● Airport objec ves ‐ LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport
‐ Airport CDM Deployed in 2016‐2017: [AOP05] 100% progress
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
‐ CCOs ‐ Initial Airport Operations ‐ Airport Safety Nets [ENV03] 80% progress Plan [AOP12] 23% progress [AOP11] 30% progress ‐ Surface Movement Planning & Routing [AOP13] 0% progress ‐ Time‐Based Separation [AOP10] 0% progress
● Airport objec ves ‐ LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence
Deployed in 2016‐2017:
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
‐ CCOs ‐ A‐SMGCS Surveillance ‐ Initial Airport Operations [ENV03] 80% progress (former Level 1) Plan [AOP04.1] 16% progress [AOP11] 0% progress ‐ A‐SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 3% progress
● Airport objec ves ‐ LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac
Deployed in 2016‐2017:
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
‐ CCOs ‐ A‐SMGCS Surveillance [ENV03] 80% progress (former Level 1) [AOP04.1] 40% progress ‐ A‐SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 33% progress
LSSIP Year 2017 France 6 Released Issue ● Airport objec ves ‐ LFBP ‐ PAU‐PYRENEES
Deployed in 2016‐2017:
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
‐ Remote Tower [AOP14] % progress
● Airport objec ves ‐ LFMD ‐ CANNES‐MANDELIEU
Deployed in 2016‐2017:
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
‐ Remote Tower [AOP14] % progress
LSSIP Year 2017 France 7 Released Issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years.
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players ‐ civil and military ‐ and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;
Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;
Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;
Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;
Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high‐level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017. In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.
The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 8 Released Issue
1. National ATM Environment
1.1. Geographical Scope
International Membership
France is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since ECAC 16th, December, 1955 EUROCONTROL 13th, December, 1960 European Union 18th, April, 1951 EASA 15th, July, 2002 ICAO 7th, December, 1944 NATO 4th, April 1949 ITU 1st, January 1866
Geographical description of the FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses the BREST, PARIS, REIMS, BORDEAUX and MARSEILLE FIRs / UIRs.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 9 Released Issue
Upper Airspace: ACC in UIR France (above FL 285)
LSSIP Year 2017 France 10 Released Issue
Airspace Classification and Organisation
CURRENT APPLICATION OF AIRSPACE CLASSIFICATIONS UP TO FL 660 - v1
FL or Alt Band France Upper Limit 660 410 285 C* 195 195 D 115 115 3K* - 115 G SFC - 3K*
Major TMA A C D E* Minor TMA C D E CTA/ Awy D E CTR A D* LTA* D E
Legend A B C D E F G Unclassified or N/A No Reply
C* = Class C with VFR restrictions, implemented above FL 195 in November 2004 3K* = FL55/ Alt 1,000 /1,500 /2,000 /2,500 /3,000 /3,500 /5,000 (ft AGL/AMSL) E* = marginal portions of TMA or week-end periods; D* = all CTR are class D except for Paris . LTA* = special arrangements for mountainous regions and high seas which are classified E . In France, Class A is only applied for Paris CTR and TMA.
1.2. National Stakeholders
Civil aviation in France is under the responsibility of the “Ministère de l’Environnement, de l’Energie et de la Mer” (Ministry of Environment, Energy and Sea) which represents France in the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council together with its military counterpart on behalf of the “Ministère de la Défense” (Ministry of Defence).
The stakeholders involved in ATM/ANS in France are the following: • Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy; • Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile (DGAC), for the: • “Direction du transport aérien” (DTA), responsible for the rule‐making of air navigation under general air traffic rules and National Supervisory Authority for the charging and performance regulation (liaising with DSAC for safety performance); • “Direction de la sécurité de l’aviation civile” (DSAC), the National Supervisory Authority except for charging and performance regulation (see above); • “Direction des services de la navigation aérienne” (DSNA), as the main provider of Air Navigation Services. • “Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses pour la sécurité de l'aviation civile” (BEA) is an independent body responsible for accident and serious incident investigations reporting directly to the Ministry of Environment, Energy and Sea. • “Météo France”, for the provision of meteorological services. • “Ministry of Defence (MoD)
LSSIP Year 2017 France 11 Released Issue • “Direction de la Circulation Aérienne Militaire” (DIRCAM): Military Air Traffic Management Directorate which is the regulator for all traffic flying under operational air traffic rules, and also for the provision of air traffic services to GAT in some parts of the French national airspace. DIRCAM performs oversight activities on behalf of DSAC, French national supervisory authority, regarding military providers providing air navigation services to general air traffic; • CFA: Air Force Command, for the provision of air navigation service (ATS & CNS) in particular for the benefit of MIL aircraft and ANS providers; • ALAVIA: Navy Aviation , for the provision of air traffic services, it should be certified for CNS; • COMALAT: Army Aviation, for the provision of air traffic services, it should be certified for CNS also mid 2017; • DGA/EV: Test and Acceptance Centre, for the provision of air traffic services; • DIRISI: Defence network communication and information systems directorate, for the provision of ground ‐ ground communication; • DIA: Aeronautical Division Information for provision aeronautical information services for OAT only. • In addition, in FIRs managed by France: • 65 independent air navigation service providers provide AFIS for GAT on 66 aerodromes; • the ESSP (European Satellite Services Providers), the members of which are AENA (ENAIRE), DFS, DSNA, ENAV, NATS , NAV and Skyguide, is in charge of the provision of the EGNOS Open Service (OS) and Safety of Life (SoL) Service. Since November 2012, EASA is competent authority for the certification and oversight of ESSP;
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Main organisation charts are given in annex B.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 12 Released Issue Ministry of Defence Ministry in charge of Transport (MoD) (MoT)
State Aviation Safety Authority General Directorate for Civil Aviation (DSAÉ) (DGAC)
Military Air Traffic Air Transport Air Navigation Civil Aviation Management Directorate Services Safety Directorate High‐Level Airspace Policy Board Directorate Directorate (DTA) (DSNA) (DSAC) (DIRCAM)
Operations Technical & Directorate Innovation Directorate (DO) (DTI)
ACCs, APPs, TWRs, Operational System, AIS R&D
LSSIP Year 2017 France 13 Released Issue Note: Apart from the civil BEA, a BEAD Air (Defence Air Accident Investigation Board) has been created in the same way in order to provide accidents and serious incidents involving State aircraft with investigations. This defence organism is placed under the direct surveillance of the Ministry of Defence. The BEAD Air is coordinating with the BEA in some cases but remains independent
Civil Regulator(s)
General Information
The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The DGAC is further detailed in the following sections.
Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule‐making Direction du Transport Arrêté of July, 9th, 2008 on the organisation of the aérien (DTA) MEEDDAT – Article 6.1.8 (NOR: DEVK0815773A) Safety Oversight Direction de la Sécurité Arrêté of December, 19th, 2008 on the organisation of de l’Aviation civile (DSAC) the DSAC (NOR: DEVA0828132A) Enforcement actions in case of DSAC sets the corrective measures or operational non‐compliance with safety restrictions to be taken. DSAC regulatory requirements Enforcement actions have different meanings, not used in our regulation on oversight. Airspace Arrêté of July, 9th, 2008 on the organisation of the DTA MEEDDAT‐ Article 6.1.8 (NOR: DEVK0815773A) Economic Arrêté of July, 9th, 2008 on the organisation of the DTA MEEDDAT – Article 6.1.7 (NOR: DEVK0815773A) Environment Arrêté of July, 9th, 2008 on the organisation of the DTA MEEDDAT‐ Article 6.1.1 (NOR: DEVK0815773A) Security DTA th DSAC assists DTA with Arrêté of July, 9 , 2008 on the organisation of the technical expertise MEEDDAT – Article 6.1.5 regarding regulatory (NOR: DEVK0815773A) activities, monitoring and Arrêté of December, 19th, 2008 on the organisation of application of the Civil the DSAC – Article 10 Aviation Security Quality (NOR: DEVA0828132A) Control National Program Accident investigation
LSSIP Year 2017 France 14 Released Issue DTA
In France the Regulator is composed of different directorates of DGAC which belongs to the Ministry in charge of Transport: DTA and DSAC. They are functionally separated from DSNA which is also part of DGAC. The “Direction du Transport Aérien” (DTA) is entrusted with the Environment, Security, Economic regulation (airlines, airports, ANS, passenger rights) Social law issues within the industry, International matters and relationships, as well as airspace management, ATM/ANS safety rule‐making and policy. Within DTA, a dedicated unit, the “Mission Ciel Unique” (MCU), is responsible for the Single European Sky matters, and with Airspace organisation, ATM/ANS rule‐making (except ANS staff training and licensing issues) and performance regulation.
Single European Sky Unit and Air Navigation Rulemaking Gilles Mantoux Deputy: Luc Lapène
Air Navigation Rulemaking Single European Sky and Airspace Jean‐Jacques Blanchard Philippe Mesquida
DSAC
Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile (DSAC) is the national supervisory authority set up by the French order of the 7th December 2015.
DSAC, as French supervisory authority is in charge of ensuring compliance with international standards applicable to civil aviation, European regulations, and national legal provisions regarding safety, environment and security. As a consequence, DSAC has national authority for supervising, in particular, ATM/ANS safety, interoperability and security. DSAC includes five central technical directorates addressing European cooperation and safety regulation, flight crews, airworthiness and operations, airports and air navigation and security. The national supervisory authority revolves around a central directorate in Paris and regional offices located throughout mainland France, overseas departments and territories of the Antilles‐Guyana, and in the Indian Ocean region.
Annual Report published: Y The last 2016 Annual Report is available and can be downloaded: https://www.ecologique‐ solidaire.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/RapportDSAC_2016_FR_Web.pdf
LSSIP Year 2017 France 15 Released Issue DSNA
Service provided
“Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne” (DSNA) was created by decree of 28th February 2005. DSNA is the single civil ANSP that provides ATC for en‐route, TMA and aerodromes in FIR France. It is state‐owned and is an entity of DGAC. Functional separation is achieved between rule‐making, oversight activities and service provision activities. Both DSNA and DSAC have a specific status called “service à compétence nationale” (nation‐wide competence office) defined by Decree of 9th May 1997.
Governance: State Ownership: 100% State Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en‐route Y Exclusive designated civil ANSP ATC approach Y Exclusive designated civil ANSP ATC Aerodrome(s) Y Exclusive designated civil ANSP AIS Y Exclusive designated civil ANSP CNS Y MET N METEO FRANCE is the only certified MET provider, and was designated on 20th December 2011. ATCO training Y Initial training is provided by ENAC (French Civil Aviation School) Others Y AFIS providers are generally aerodrome operators, except Miquelon, done by DSNA Additional information: Provision of services in Y Existing ATS services through letters of agreement where appropriate other State(s): Annual Report published: Y https://www.ecologique‐solidaire.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/DSNA‐DGAC‐RA‐ 2016‐FR.pdf
For more information see civil aviation website http://www.developpement‐durable.gouv.fr/politiques/aviation‐civile
ATC systems in use
DACOTA Thales Air systems V8 (2016) IRMA Sogeti High Tech V8 (2016) ODS Cap Gemini 6.2.7.4 (2016) OMEGA Sogeti High Tech V9 (2016) STIP Thales Services I 27 (2016) STPV Thales Services V29 (2016) S.Erato V5.0
LSSIP Year 2017 France 16 Released Issue
Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 Y DSNA/ENAV
FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: STIP/STPV: Thalès Services Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? N Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2020 ATC Unit
SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: ARTAS, EUROCONTROL (CAMOS) Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? N Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? N/A ATC Unit
ATC Units
The en‐route ATC units in the French airspace which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:
ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En‐route TMA BORDEAUX ACC 20 ‐ LFBB BREST ACC 18 ‐ LFRR MARSEILLE ACC 28 ‐ LFMM PARIS ACC 21 ‐ LFFF REIMS ACC 19 ‐ LFEE
1Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))
LSSIP Year 2017 France 17 Released Issue A total of 44 TMAs are managed in the French mainland airspace (excluding overseas regions) by APPs located at the principal airports. Most important of them are:
ATC Unit Number of approach Associated FIR(s) Remarks positions En‐route TMA PARIS CDG ‐ 15 IFR LFFF PARIS ORLY ‐ 7 IFR LFFF BÂLE – 6 IFR ‐ LFEE MULHOUSE + 2 VFR 4 IFR BORDEAUX ‐ LFBB + 1 VFR LILLE ‐ 4 IFR LFFF 8 IFR LYON ‐ LFMM + 2 VFR 6 IFR MARSEILLE ‐ LFMM + 2 VFR 4 IFR MONTPELLIER ‐ LFMM + 1 VFR 3 IFR NANTES ‐ LFRR + 1 VFR 9 IFR NICE ‐ LFMM + 4 VFR STRASBOURG ‐ 5 IFR + 1 VFR LFEE TOULOUSE ‐ 6 IFR + 1 VFR LFBB
Airports
General information
In addition to aerodromes operated by “Aéroports De Paris” (ADP), eleven major airports (11), whose land belongs to the state, are operated by companies under concession by DGAC. This concession tasks the Airport Operator to manage not only the land side and the air terminals but also the air side (that includes signs and markings, lighting). Regional airports property has been transferred to regional communities. These communities delegate the operation to airport operators under “statement of work”. DSAC certification addresses all tasks of the aerodrome operator including SMS (Safety Management System), structures, lighting on the runway and taxiways. Each year, the number of aerodrome operators that need a certification is increased in order to phase the process. UAF (Union des Aéroports Français – www.aeroport.fr) is the association of the Airport Operators. An airport slot coordinator COHOR (Association pour la Coordination des Horaires – www.cohor.org), a different entity independent from State, airlines and airports, is responsible for the airport slot allocation for the airlines or any aircraft operator, for any operation at French coordinated airports, based on the EU Regulation 95/93 as amended.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 18 Released Issue
Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives.
So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP:
‐ Paris Roissy ‐ Charles de Gaulle (LFPG) ‐ Paris Orly (LFPO) ‐ Nice Côte d’Azur (LFMN) ‐ Lyon Saint Exupéry (LFLL) ‐ Marseille Provence (LFML) ‐ Toulouse Blagnac (LFBO)
Military Authorities
The defence activities encompass the functions of regulator, ANSP, airport operator, airspace user, aircraft operator, aeronautical information provider (only for OAT), for all the traffic flying OAT and also for the provision of air traffic services to OAT and GAT flights in some parts of national airspace and around some airports. Regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.
Regulatory role
DIRCAM (Military Air Traffic Management Directorate) is the defence authority responsible for providing regulation of air navigation under operational air traffic rules. DIRCAM is embedded inside the State Aviation Safety Authority (DSAÉ), which deals with regulation and oversight for ATM and airworthiness, and also aircrew training and aircraft operations. To ensure safety of air navigation in the whole French airspace, regulatory activities are coordinated between DIRCAM and DTA under the High‐Level Airspace Policy Board (“Directoire de l’Espace Aérien”).
In the same way than DGAC organisation, military ATM safety regulatory functions have been separated in two parts, under the authority of the Director of the DIRCAM, which encompasses three sub‐directorates: ‐ Airspace sub‐directorate (SDEA) in charge of airspace and relevant rulemaking; ‐ Regulatory sub‐directorate (SDR) in charge of Air navigation, Airspace and Aerodromes regulation; ‐ Surveillance and Audit sub‐directorate (SDSA) in charge of military ANSPs supervisory activities, on behalf of DSAC for the services provided for GAT, approval of military aerodromes for the need of State aviation. Therefore, DIRCAM is organized as follows:
LSSIP Year 2017 France 19 Released Issue DIRCAM Director BG** Pierre REUTTER Deputy: COL Marc LAPIERRE
SDEA SDR SDSA LTC Luc ANTOON LCL François CLEMENT COL Vianney CAZELLE
Regulatory framework and rule‐making
OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed Y national legal provisions? by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Decrees in State council or Level of such legal provision: Decree in State council or Prime minister level. DIRCAM Regulation prime minister level Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister Minister of Defence These provisions cover: These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y ATCO Training N ATCO Training Y ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing N ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Y Aircrew Training N ESARR applicability Y Aircrew Licensing N Additional Information: Crews and controllers are both Additional Information ATCO licences are delivered by DSAC trained and licensed by relevant Defence Authorities but and trained in a military school certified by DSAC most of them have a civil licence too. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: about these provisions: National AIP Y National AIP Y National Military AIP Y National Military AIP Y EUROCONTROL eAIP Y EUROCONTROL eAIP Y Other: Other:
LSSIP Year 2017 France 20 Released Issue
Oversight
OAT GAT National oversight body for OAT: NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: The DIRCAM French National Supervisory Authority for GAT services provided by military ANSPs OAT oversight has been launched in is the DSAC. Some military ANSPs supervisory activities are performed by DIRCAM, September 2012. on behalf of DSAC, through a national decree and an operational letter of Actually it encompasses the oversight agreement. Oversight methods used by DIRCAM are supervised by DSAC. Military of training organisations, military ATCO training oversight and licensing are performed by DSAC. ATCO licenses and OAT providers. Additional information: Additional information:
Service Provision role
MoD organizations are providing ATS to general air traffic in some parts of the airspace. DIRCAM is responsible for providing aeronautical information at national level for OAT.
Ministry of Defence
Army Navy DGA EMA Air Force DIRCAM COMALAT ALAVIA ATS/CNS DGA/EV DIRISI DIA CFA
OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En‐Route Y If not provided by MIL specify En‐Route N who does provide this service Approach/TMA Y “ Approach/TMA Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y “ Airfield/TWR/GND Y AIS Y “ AIS Y MET Y For observations and forecasting, MET Y data are provided by METEO FRANCE and military services under METEO FRANCE supervision, and tools are METEO FRANCE devices SAR Y SAR Y TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y Other: Other: Additional Information: Additional Information:
LSSIP Year 2017 France 21 Released Issue
Military ANSP providing GAT Y If YES, since: 17/12/15 Duration of the 6 services SES certified? 13/06/17 Certificate: 6 17/12/15 6 5/12/17 6 25/09/15 5 Certificate issued by: DSAC If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information:
User role
State Aviation Authority
Department of Homeland Department of Homeland Procurement Department of Army Navy Air Force Security Security Agency Finance COMALAT ALAVIA CFA Office of Public Safety Gendarmerie DGA/EV CUSTOMS
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y fly?
If Military fly OAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing N Within specific corridors only Y Within the regular (GAT) national route network N Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service N
If Military fly GAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y Others: Flow and capacity exemptions are only authorized for some governmental and prioritized flights.
Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
Military in France applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y
FUA Level 1 implemented: Y
FUA Level 2 implemented: Y
FUA Level 3 implemented: Y
LSSIP Year 2017 France 22 Released Issue 2. Traffic and Capacity
2.1. Evolution of traffic in France
France - Annual IFR Movements 4.500.000
4.000.000
3.500.000
3.000.000
2.500.000
2.000.000 IFR flightsIFR IFR movements - Actuals 1.500.000 IFR movements - Baseline forecast
1.000.000 IFR movements - High forecast
500.000 IFR movements - Low forecast
0 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F
A = Actual | F = Forecast
EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017) IFR flights yearly growth 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F H 4.3%5.2%3.3%4.0%2.4%2.4%2.3% France B 1.6%1.5%4.4%3.9%3.2%2.0%1.8%1.3%1.5%1.4% L 3.5% 1.4% -0.3% 0.3% -0.2% 0.1% 0.0% ECACB 1.7%1.6%2.8%4.5%2.8%2.1%1.9%1.5%1.7%1.7%
LSSIP Year 2017 France 23 Released Issue 2017 Traffic in the France increased by 4.0 % during Summer 2017 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2016.
2018‐2022
The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.3% and 3.5% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.0%.
2.2. Bordeaux ACC Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022
LFBBALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
4000 1.0
0.9 3500 0.8 3000 0.7 2500 0.6
2000 0.5
0.4
IFR flights (Daily Average) (Daily flights IFR 1500
0.3 flight) per (minutes Delay Enroute 1000 0.2 500 0.1
0 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Peak Day Traffic 3066 3183 3197 3394 3570 Summer Traffic 2615 2668 2744 2936 3097 Yearly Traffic* 2238 2282 2349 2476 2738 Summer Traffic Forecast 3190 3259 3314 3369 3422 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 3257 3369 3488 3592 3692 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 3133 3128 3133 3140 3142 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.51 0.34 0.34 0.79 0.63 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.30 0.23 0.34 0.70 0.54
*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017
LSSIP Year 2017 France 24 Released Issue Performance summer 2017
En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap + 5.5 % 207 (+3%) 0.20 0.63 Yes The average en‐route delay per flight decreased from 0.79 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.63 minutes per flight during the same period in 2017. 45% of the delays were due to ATC Capacity, 21% due to Industrial action,17% due to Weather, 9% due to Other, 3% due to Equipment, 2% due to Special Events, 2% due to ATC Staffing, 1% due to Airspace Management and 1% due to ATC Routing Capacity Plan +14% Achieved Comments Some DCTs implemented, a new stepped Partially FRA Step 2: H24 DCTs with military activity FRA implementation plan is developed Improved Airspace Management / FUA Yes FUA TSA 10 Yes “New TSA 6” (more dynamic ASM) Yes Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes CDM processes and procedures Yes MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Yes “New TSA 6” Yes Yes New interface to be reviewed – capacity SWFAB/FABEC Barcelona interface GIROM‐OKABI decrease in LFBB 5th layer in R&L sectors No Postponed to 1st March 2018 Flexible rostering Partially ERATO (stripless, MTCD) Yes Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Re‐evaluation of sector capacities Yes Maximum configuration: 21 UCESO No 20 sectors opened Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed with ACCESS/Reverse CASA to be at 207. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 217 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 204.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 25 Released Issue Planning Period 2018‐2022
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Profiles 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline 2018 2019 H 236 14% 246 4% Ref. 230 11% 236 3% LFBB 207 L 225 9% 228 1% Open 230 11% 236 3% C/R 226 9% 232 3% Summer Capacity Plan 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 FRA Free Route Airspace implementati on Airspace Management Improved Airspace Management / FUA Advanced FUA FUA TSA 34 Airport & TMA Network
Integration Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Cooperative Traffic CDM processes and procedures Management MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) ESSO project including new Change of DFL Madrid‐ between
Bordeaux upper and Airspace interface lower airspace (BAMBI) 5th layer in
R&L sectors Procedures Staffing Flexible rostering Enhanced Technical Mode S Re‐evaluation Capacity of sector capacities Training Significant Events 4Flight Max sectors 21 UCESO 21 UCESO 21 UCESO 21 UCESO 20 UCESO Planned Annual Capacity 7%* 4% 2% 2% 1% Increase Reference profile Annual % 11% 3% N/A N/A N/A Increase Difference Capacity Plan v. ‐3.9% ‐2.5% N/A N/A N/A Reference Profile Annual Reference Value (min) 0.13 0.12 N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) 0.21 0.20 N/A N/A N/A * The capacity increase is mainly coming from the implementation of ERATO and the Additional information flexible rostering.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 26 Released Issue The charts below show the average opening of sectors planned for Summer 2018. On busy days, up to 21 sectors could be open if necessary.
Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐ WD Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐ WE 20 20 18 18 16 16 14 14 12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00
LFBBCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 300
250 hour) 200 per
150 (movements
profile
100 Capacity
50
0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 230 236 Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 230 236 Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 226 232 Capacity Profile ‐ High 236 246 Capacity Profile ‐ Low 225 228 Capacity Baseline 201 207 2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 221 230 235 240 242
2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook A small capacity gap is expected for 2018 and 2019.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 27 Released Issue 2.3. Brest ACC Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022
LFRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
4500 2.0
4000 1.8
3500 1.6 1.4 3000 1.2 2500 1.0 2000 0.8 IFR flights (Daily Average) (Daily flights IFR 1500
0.6 per flight) (minutes Delay Enroute
1000 0.4
500 0.2
0 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Peak Day Traffic 3345 3550 3429 3632 3977 Summer Traffic 2850 2980 2975 3169 3409 Yearly Traffic* 2457 2559 2538 2697 3036 Summer Traffic Forecast 3540 3604 3659 3718 3776 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 3598 3734 3846 3975 4084 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 3476 3465 3470 3472 3474 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.50 0.63 1.04 1.60 1.05 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.35 0.53 1.41 1.76 0.98
*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017
Performance summer 2017
En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap +7.6 % 224 (+10%) 0.17 1.05 Yes The average en‐route delay decreased from 1.60 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 1.05 minutes per flight over the Summer period in 2017. 70% of the delays were due to the reason ATC Capacity, 14% due to Industrial Actions, 7% due to ATC Staffing, 5% due to Weather, 1% due to Equipment, 1% due to ATC Routeing, 1% due to Airspace Management, 1% due Special Events and 1% due to Other. Capacity Plan +13% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes “New TSA 6” (more dynamic ASM) Yes Improvement of ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes CDM processes and procedures Yes MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Yes Reorganisation of airspace below FL145 No Postponed to Autumn 2018 “New TSA 6‐8‐9” Yes Flexible rostering Yes Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Re‐evaluation of sector capacities Yes Maximum configuration: 18 UCESO Yes 19 sectors were opened
LSSIP Year 2017 France 28 Released Issue Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 224, 10% higher than in 2016. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 247 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 227.
Planning Period 2018‐2022
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Profiles 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline 2018 2019 H 276 23% 286 4% Ref. 268 20% 273 2% LFRR 224 L 253 13% 256 1% Open 268 20% 273 2% C/R 262 17% 267 2% Summer Capacity Plan 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Free route Lisboa/Madri
d/ Free Route Airspace Brest FRA implementati on Airspace Management Improved airspace management / FUA Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network
Integration Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Cooperative Traffic CDM processes and procedures Management MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Reorganisatio n of airspace below FL145 Airspace Reorganisatio n of airspace
Brest, Jersey, London Procedures Staffing Flexible rostering Enhanced Technical Mode S Capacity Training Significant Events 4Flight Max sectors 18 UCESO 18 UCESO 18 UCESO 18 UCESO 17 UCESO Planned Annual Capacity 12%* 3% 1% 2% 1% Increase Reference profile Annual % 20% 2% N/A N/A N/A Increase Difference Capacity Plan v. ‐6.3% ‐5.1% N/A N/A N/A Reference Profile Annual Reference Value (min) 0.10 0.11 N/A N/A N/A
LSSIP Year 2017 France 29 Released Issue Summer reference value (min) 0.17 0.18 N/A N/A N/A * The capacity increase is mainly coming from the implementation of the flexible Additional information rostering.
Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐ WD Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐ WE 18 18 16 16 14 14 12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00
LFRRACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 350
300
250 hour)
per
200 (movements
150 profile
100 Capacity
50
0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 268 273 Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 268 273 Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 262 267 Capacity Profile ‐ High 276 286 Capacity Profile ‐ Low 253 256 Capacity Baseline 204 224 2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 251 259 262 267 270
2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook There will be a capacity gap in Brest ACC in 2018 and 2019. The traffic increase in Brest ACC was high in 2017 (+7.6%), and the high capacity increase of 10% was not sufficient to close the capacity gap. For 2018, a high traffic increase is expected, and the planned capacity increase of +12% will not be sufficient to close the capacity gap.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 30 Released Issue 2.4. Marseille ACC Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022
LFMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
5000 2.0
4500 1.8
4000 1.6
3500 1.4
3000 1.2
2500 1.0
2000 0.8 IFR flights (Daily Average) (Daily flights IFR
1500 0.6 flight) per (minutes Delay Enroute
1000 0.4
500 0.2
0 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Peak Day Traffic 3999 4032 4030 4178 4253 Summer Traffic 3271 3269 3270 3456 3619 Yearly Traffic* 2746 2730 2743 2871 3154 Summer Traffic Forecast 3733 3814 3879 3945 4011 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 3808 3977 4122 4262 4406 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 3661 3653 3662 3662 3666 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.72 0.86 0.19 0.46 1.61 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.44 0.57 0.20 0.44 1.24
*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017
Performance summer 2017
En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap +4.7 % 239 (‐4%) 0.24 1.61 Yes The average en‐route delay increased from 0.46 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 1.61 minutes per flight in Summer 2017. 60% of the delays were due to the reason ATC Capacity, 19% due to Weather, 14% due to Industrial Actions, 4% due to Staffing 1% due to Airspace Management and 1% due to Equipment. Capacity Plan +12% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes Airspace management procedures for D54 during Summer Yes season Improvement of ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes CDM Processes and procedures Yes MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Yes Flexible rostering No Planned before Summer 2018 Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Maximum configuration: 28 UCESO Yes 28 sectors open Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed with REVERSE CASA to be at 239, 4% lower compared to Summer 2016. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 263 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 252.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 31 Released Issue Planning Period 2018‐2022
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Profiles 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline 2018 2019 H 285 19% 296 4% Ref. 278 16% 283 2% LFMM 239 L 270 13% 273 1% Open 278 16% 283 2% C/R 282 18% 287 2%
Summer Capacity Plan 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Implementati Free Route Airspace on of FRA Airspace Management Improved airspace management / FUA Advanced FUA Airspace management procedures for D54 during Summer season Airport & TMA Network
Integration Improved ATFM procedures and STAM Cooperative Traffic CDM Processes and procedures Management MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Reorganisatio n of lower airspace and delegation of LFKJ interface ATS to APP units below Airspace FL145 IAM project DFL changes in (Interface WW and MM LFML) sectors IAG project (Interface Geneva) Procedures SMART SKI Staffing Flexible rostering 4flight (new Enhanced ATM system) Technical Mode S implementatio n Capacity Training for 4Flight (Autumn Significant Events 2018 to end 2020) 25 UCESO 28 UCESO 28 UCESO (tbd in 28 UCESO 28 UCESO Max sectors (15+13) (15+13) transition (15+13) (15+13) plan) Planned Annual Capacity 12%* 10%* 0% 1% 6% Increase Reference profile Annual % 16% 2% N/A N/A N/A Increase Difference Capacity Plan v. ‐3.6% 4.2% N/A N/A N/A Reference Profile
LSSIP Year 2017 France 32 Released Issue Annual Reference Value (min) 0.15 0.15 N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) 0.23 0.23 N/A N/A N/A * The capacity increases are mainly coming from the flexible rostering. The national Additional information agreement is already validated, and the local agreement is under negotiation. LFMMACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 350
300
250 hour)
per
200 (movements
150 profile
100 Capacity
50
0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 278 283 Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 278 283 Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 282 287 Capacity Profile ‐ High 285 296 Capacity Profile ‐ Low 270 273 Capacity Baseline 248 239 2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 268 295 295 298 316
2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook The capacity gap should be closed in 2019. The capacity increases in 2018 and 2019 are mainly coming from the flexible rostering. The national agreement is already validated, and the local agreement is under negotiation.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 33 Released Issue 2.5. Paris ACC Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022
LFFFALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
4500 1.0
4000 0.9
3500 0.8 0.7 3000 0.6 2500 0.5 2000 0.4 IFR flights (Daily Average) (Daily flights IFR
1500 flight) per (minutes Delay Enroute 0.3
1000 0.2
500 0.1
0 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Peak Day Traffic 3863 3904 3925 4122 4022 Summer Traffic 3309 3353 3502 3574 3595 Yearly Traffic* 3107 3125 3205 3266 3395 Summer Traffic Forecast 3631 3699 3760 3809 3864 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 3708 3775 3946 3998 4041 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 3567 3556 3556 3551 3548 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.17 0.20 0.17 0.40 0.17 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.34 0.13
*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017
Performance summer 2017
En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap +0.6 % 283 (+1%) 0.19 0.17 No The average en‐route delay decreased from 0.40 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.17 minutes per flight over the same period in 2017. 67% of the delays were due to the reason Weather, 15% due to ATC Capacity, 14% due to Industrial Action, 3% due to Equipment and 1% to Special Events. Capacity Plan +12% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM / GF project Yes GF project is part of iStream CDM Processes and procedures Yes MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Yes Flexible rostering Partially Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Maximum configuration: 21 UCESO Yes 20 sectors were sufficient Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed with ACCESS to be at 283, 1% higher than in Summer 2016. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 272 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 252.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 34 Released Issue
Planning Period 2018‐2022 The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Profiles 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline 2018 2019 H 284 0% 287 1% Ref. 283 0% 285 1% LFFF 283 L 283 0% 283 0% Open 283 0% 285 1% C/R 283 0% 285 1% Summer Capacity Plan 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 LMH project FRA Free Route Airspace FRA above Implementatio FL345 n Airspace Management Improved airspace management / FUA Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network
Integration Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM / GF project Cooperative Traffic xStream Management CDM Processes and procedures MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Reorganisatio Reorganisatio Reorganisatio n of lower n of lower n of lower airspace and airspace and airspace and delegation of delegation of delegation of Airspace ATS to APP ATS to APP ATS to APP units below units below units below FL115 (South FL115 (North FL115 (North of FIR) West of FIR) East of FIR) Procedures SMART SKI Staffing Flexible rostering Enhanced Technical Mode S Capacity Training for 4Flight Significant Events (autumn 2021 to end 2022) 20 UCESO 20 UCESO 20 UCESO 20 UCESO 18 UCESO Max sectors (10+10) (10+10) (10+10) (10+10) (9+9) Planned Annual Capacity 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% Increase Reference profile Annual % 0% 1% N/A N/A N/A Increase Difference Capacity Plan v. 1.1% 1.4% N/A N/A N/A Reference Profile Annual Reference Value (min) 0.14 0.14 N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) 0.18 0.18 N/A N/A N/A
Additional information
LSSIP Year 2017 France 35 Released Issue Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐ WD Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐ WE 10 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00
LFFFACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 350
300
250 hour)
per
200 (movements
150 profile
100 Capacity
50
0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 283 285 Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 283 285 Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 283 285 Capacity Profile ‐ High 284 287 Capacity Profile ‐ Low 283 283 Capacity Baseline 281 283 2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 286 289 292 295 295
2018 – 2022 Planning Period Outlook There will be no capacity gap in Paris ACC for the planning period.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 36 Released Issue 2.6. Reims ACC Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022
LFEEACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
4000 1.0
0.9 3500 0.8 3000 0.7 2500 0.6
2000 0.5
0.4
IFR flights (Daily Average) (Daily flights IFR 1500
0.3 flight) per (minutes Delay Enroute 1000 0.2 500 0.1
0 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Peak Day Traffic 3030 3193 3267 3377 3480 Summer Traffic 2719 2832 2899 3021 3096 Yearly Traffic* 2430 2522 2574 2668 2839 Summer Traffic Forecast 3168 3224 3264 3310 3354 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 3220 3337 3445 3536 3613 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 3122 3109 3106 3101 3092 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.47 0.60 0.66 0.40 0.38 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.31 0.42 0.55 0.26 0.28
*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017
Performance summer 2017 En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap + 2.5 % 215 (+8%) 0.25 0.38 Yes The average en‐route delay slightly decreased from 0.40 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.38 minutes per flight in Summer 2017. 64% of the delays were due to ATC Capacity, 20% due to Weather, 10% due to Industrial Action, 3% due to Staffing, 2% due to Airspace management, and 1% due to Special Event. Capacity Plan +12% Achieved Comments Additional DCTs Partially Work in progress Improved airspace management / FUA Yes FABEC XMAN Yes Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes CDM Processes and procedures Yes MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Yes Flexible rostering Yes Enhanced Mode S No Postponed to Spring 2018 Maximum configuration: 19 UCESO No 18 sectors Summer 2017 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 215. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 224 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 207.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 37 Released Issue Planning Period 2018‐2022
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Profiles 2017 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline 2018 2019 H 234 9% 245 5% Ref. 229 7% 234 2% LFEE 215 L 224 4% 227 1% Open 229 7% 234 2% C/R 226 5% 230 2% Summer Capacity Plan 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 FRA Free Route Airspace implementati on Airspace Management Improved airspace management / FUA Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network FABEC XMAN Integration Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM Cooperative Traffic CDM Processes and procedures Management MAC (Collaborative ATFCM Measures) Airspace YB sector Procedures Staffing Flexible rostering 4flight (new Enhanced ATM system) Technical Mode S implementati on Capacity Training for 4Flight (Autumn Significant Events 2018 to end 2020) Max sectors 19 UCESO 19 UCESO 18 UCESO 19 UCESO 19 UCESO Planned Annual Capacity 4% 3% 0% 1% 6% Increase Reference profile Annual % 7% 2% N/A N/A N/A Increase Difference Capacity Plan v. ‐2.2% ‐1.3% N/A N/A N/A Reference Profile Annual Reference Value (min) 0.18 0.17 N/A N/A N/A Summer reference value (min) 0.25 0.24 N/A N/A N/A
Additional information
The charts below show the average opening of sectors planned for Summer 2018. On busy days, up to 19 sectors could be open if necessary.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 38 Released Issue Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐ WD Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐ WE 16 16 14 14 12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00
LFEEACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 300
250 hour) 200 per
150 (movements
profile
100 Capacity
50
0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 229 234 Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 229 234 Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 226 230 Capacity Profile ‐ High 234 245 Capacity Profile ‐ Low 224 227 Capacity Baseline 199 215 2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 224 231 231 233 247
2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook There will be a capacity gap in Reims in 2018 and 2019.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 39 Released Issue 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions
Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to France for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.
Conclusion Applicable to VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT All State that are ROUTING. implementing THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS. AOM21.1 and (page 14 of the Report) AOM21.2
AOM21.1 is completed and AOM21.2 is well on track within FABEC context.
Conclusion Applicable to ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY All States + EC CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) The French regulator (DTA) is working in coordination with the French NSA (DSAC) in order to implement ADQ‐ IR in France. Discussions with DSNA and aerodrome operators have allowed assessing French state of compliance with the regulation. Work remains to be done considering the number of parties involved, including parties outside the scope of the oversight of the NSA. The modification of the aeronautical information management regulatory framework the 23rd of March 2015 and the issuance of an ADQ‐IR enforcement roadmap the 16th of June 2015 will support the momentum already initiated towards compliance.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 40 Released Issue 4. Implementation Projects
4.1. National projects
Main national projects are listed below.
4‐FLIGHT Defence Organisation(s): DSNA (FR), Mil. Authority (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2016‐2020 Status: Procurement is under final discussion for defence. Description: Implementation of a new standardized ATS system for Enroute in both civilian and military centers Link and references ATM MP links: L3: ATC07.1, ATC12.1, ITY‐AGDL Other links: ‐ Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Safety and capacity improvement through both advanced decision support tools available and better coordination process for the Air Traffic Controllers. Interoperability between military and civilian centers. Environment: ‐ Capacity: Safety and capacity improvement through both advanced decision support tools available and better coordination process for the Air Traffic Controllers. Interoperability between military and civilian centers. Cost‐efficiency: ‐ Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 41 Released Issue
AMAN. (‐) Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2018‐2023 Status: Procurement has been awarded a few years ago. AMAN is operational in version 1. A new more complete version will be implemented in 2015‐2016. Description: To replace legacy AMAN system (MAESTRO), a new AMAN tool has been deployed and is operational at LFFF since mid‐2014 for sequencing and metering the flow of traffic inbound the Paris terminal area. This new AMAN system has been implemented as well in the South East of France for the benefit of Lyon and Nice TMA and will be extended to LFMM in 2016 . Link and references ATM MP links: L3: ATC15.1 Other links: ASBU : B0‐RSEQ Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: ‐ Environment: Less fuel burnt through reduced speed and optimized trajectories. Capacity: Increasing of capacity and reduction of holdings in TMA area. Cost‐efficiency: ‐ Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 42 Released Issue
Aéroport du Grand Ouest à Notre‐Dame‐des‐ Landes (NDDL) (‐) Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: A 6 month mission has been given to Mr ROL‐TANGUY, from the Cour des Comptes, to build the transportation strategy for the region, in collaboration with the local communities. Status: Cancelled Description: A political decision was taken on the 17th of January 2018 to cancel the project of a future airport and maintain and develop Nantes‐Atlantique airport that is located very close to the city with a final approach 21 that flies over the city center. The upgrade of the current airport will comprise: extended RWY, precision approaches, new terminal,… Link and references ATM MP links: ‐ Other links: ‐ Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: ‐ Environment: ‐ Capacity: ‐ Cost‐efficiency: To be determined Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 43 Released Issue
CSSIP Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2012‐2019 Status: AMHS COM Centre is now operational IP‐WAN is now operational VoIP for telephony and radio is now operational Description: Migration of all networks for data and voice communications to Internet Protocol (IP) : LAN, IP‐WAN, AMHS COM Centre. Link and references ATM MP links: L3: COM10 Other links: ASBU : B1‐SWIM Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: ‐ Environment: ‐ Capacity: ‐ Cost‐efficiency: Cost efficiency improvement through up to date technology Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 44 Released Issue
Geographic Database ‐ AIM tool Organisation(s): DSNA (FR), Groupe ADP (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2016 to 2020 Status: Specifications are under writing. Description: Creation of database including aeronautical information and geographical data (eTOD and AMDB). DSNA will use the database for their respective needs (procedure design, cartography...).
Link and references ATM MP links: ‐ Other links: ‐ Project included in RP2 NA Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in Y Name/Code in DP2016: SESAR DP AF 1.2.2 DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: The systems developed and the use of eTOD and AMDB will ensure a more relevant information at airspace users Environment: ‐ Capacity: ‐ Cost‐efficiency: ‐ Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 45 Released Issue
ILS rationalization Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 30 ILS have been decommissioned, 13 have been transferred to the airport operators. Status: ‐ Description: Within its navigation strategy, France equipped every instrument runway end with APV procedures and has defined the associated ILS decommissioning. Link and references ATM MP links: ‐ Other links: NAV06 ASBU : B0‐APTA Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: A safety benefit by implementing APV at every IFR runway ends. Environment: An environmental benefit by implementing APV at every IFR runway ends. Capacity: ‐ Cost‐efficiency: Cost efficiency by decommissioning ILS system. Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 46 Released Issue
New Project4‐FLIGHT Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: The contract has been awarded in October 2011. Complete implementation scheduled between 2017 and 2024 : step 1: implementation is planned end of 2020 in Reims and Marseille ACC; step 2 implementation in Paris ACC end 2022; implementation is planned 2024 in Brest and Bordeaux ACC. Status: Procurement has been awarded in October 2011 Initial trials performed successfully in December 2012 . First partial planned operational use performed in two pilots ACC Commissioning is planned in pilot ACCs by 2020 Description: The objective of 4‐FLIGHT is the procurement of the next generation of the ATM system in order to prepare SESAR convergence. This new generation of ATM system will be based on an existing supplier line of product in 2 steps: the first one with a new architecture and very advanced functions, and the second one fully compliant with the SESAR CONOPS Link and references ATM MP links: L3: ATC07.1, ITY‐AGDL Other links: AUO‐0301, TS‐0102 ASBU : B0‐RSEQ B0‐TBO Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environmental performance improvement through enhanced flight plan and trajectory management. Environment: ‐ Capacity: Capacity performance improvement through enhanced flight plan and trajectory management. Cost‐efficiency: Better cost efficiency through shared development and maintenance costs Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 47 Released Issue
PBN APV Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2012‐2018 Status: Publication of 200 RNAV approach procedures (156 LPV 81 baro‐VNAV) for 220 instrument runway ends. Description: Publication of APV procedures on every instrument runway ends (according to ICAO resolution A37‐11) Link and references ATM MP links: L3: NAV10 Other links: ASBU: B0‐APTA Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Safety improvement by providing vertical guidance on all runway ends Environment: ‐ Capacity: ‐ Cost‐efficiency: Cost efficiency by reducing the conventional equipment network Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 48 Released Issue SEPIA Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2017 to 2022 Status: Specifications are under writing. Cft issued at the beginning of 2019.
Description: Replacement of AIM system : AIXM 5 data exchange, enhanced process for collection of originated data, fabrication of AIM products and data sets. SEPIA is a SOFIA related project. Link and references ATM MP links: L3: ITY‐ADQ Other links: ASBU : B0‐DATM Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: DP AF 5.3.1 (Compliance with SESAR DP2016: interoperability standards are required) Performance contribution Safety: Ensuring quality and integrity of aeronautical data. Environment: ‐ Capacity: ‐ Cost‐efficiency: ‐ Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 49 Released Issue
SOFIA Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2016 to 2022 Status: Consolidation of users needs and, elaboration of service implementation roadmap. Management for launching related projects for implement new services.
Description: Umbrella project for modernizing aeronautical information data chain and processes in order to provide added‐value services meeting with customer requirements. Link and references ATM MP links: L3: ITY‐ADQ Other links: ASBU B0‐DATM Project included in RP2 NA Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in Y Name/Code in DP2016: AF 5.3.1 (Compliance with SESAR DP2016: interoperability standards are required) Performance contribution Safety: Indirect contribution to safety. This project is an enabler for DSNA. Environment: ‐ Capacity: ‐ Cost‐efficiency: ‐ Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 50 Released Issue
SOFIA BRIEFING Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: 2017 to 2019 Status: User needs consolidated. Initial operation : end of 2018 Description: Replacement of the actual briefing tool.
SOFIA BRIEFING is a SOFIA related project Link and references ATM MP links: ‐ Other links: ESSIP INF04 ASBU : B0‐DATM Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Safety improvement by better general aviation flight planning Environment: ‐ Capacity: ‐ Cost‐efficiency: ‐ Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 51 Released Issue
SYSAT (Systems for APP and TWR) Organisation(s): DSNA (FR) Type of project: National Schedule: From 2017 to 2021 Status: Procurements started in 2014. First order was made in April 2015. Negotiation is in progress, purchase will be done in autumn 2016. Paris CDG implementation in 2019, then Paris Orly and Le Bourget in 2020 and Nice TMA mid 2021. Description: Replacement of ATM system in all DSNA mainland TWRs and in major APPs. Link and references ATM MP links: ‐ Other links: HUM03.1 ICAO ASBU: B0‐RSEQ, B0‐SURF, B0‐ACDM, B0‐APTA, B0‐FICE, B0‐ ASEP SESAR: Compliance with SESAR interoperability standards are required Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Safety through improved back‐up. Environment: ‐ Capacity: Capacity through better automation Cost‐efficiency: Cost efficiency through sharing of cost and up to date technology Operational efficiency: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 52 Released Issue 4.2. FAB projects
There are two main FABEC projects ongoing: XMAN (Extended Arrival Manager) FRA (Free Route Airspace)
Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: Extended Arrival Belgocontrol (BE), DFS The XMAN project envisages three development and The FABEC XMAN Basic L3: ATC07.1, Management (XMAN) (DE), DSNA (FR), LVNL ‐ implementation steps: Step has already been ATC15.1 Luchtverkeersleiding 1. Basic Step ‐ From 2012 to 2024 implemented at several L2: TS‐0102, TS‐ Nederland (NL), MUAC The Basic Step uses the currently available systems and ACCs for several airports. 0305 ANSP (MAS), Skyguide technologies in order to establish cross‐centre arrival The implementation phase (CH) management in the airspace controlled by Belgocontrol, DFS, of the Basic Step will DSNA, LVNL, MUAC and skyguide. continue until 2024. 2. Advanced Step ‐ From 2013 to 2024 The Milestone 3 (solution The Advanced Step takes into account validated SESAR design) of the Advanced results in order to improve the en‐route part of cross‐centre Step was formally arrival management in the overall FABEC airspace. This step approved in September requires enhanced data exchange between ACC/UAC in order 2017. The first to support a delay sharing strategy. Additional planning operational information related to departures and airborne flights will be implementations are provided by Airport‐CDM and Network Management. This expected in the second step has an impact on all FABEC ACCs. half of 2018. 3. Optimised Step ‐ From 2018 to 2024 The Optimised Step is The Optimised Step will take into account further validated planned to start in July SESAR results and will optimise the cooperation between 2018. arrival management and Airport‐CDM, Aircraft Operators and Network Management in order to widely share Arrival Management (AM) information between all partners and to process and to apply Arrival Management information where needed. This Optimised Step has been put on hold until needs beyond the Advanced Step become more apparent.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 53 Released Issue Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links: Free Route Airspace Belgocontrol (BE), DFS The FABEC FRA project was launched in 2011 with the DFS, DSNA, MUAC and L3: AOM21.1, (FRA) (DE), DSNA (FR), LVNL ‐ objective of setting up a FABEC Free Route Airspace with skyguide have already AOM21.2 Luchtverkeersleiding Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace (A‐FUA) at FL 365 (and implemented several L2: AOM‐0401, Nederland (NL), MIL lower when and where possible) in a stepped approach by direct routes and will AOM‐0402, AOM‐ (DE), MUAC ANSP (MAS), the end of RP2. continue to implement 0500, AOM‐0501, Mil. Authority (BE), Mil. In 2015, the project has been aligned with the requirements further direct routes in the AOM‐0505, AOM‐ Authority (FR), Militaire of the Pilot Common Project requirements. This induced an coming years. 0506, CM‐0102‐A Luchtvaart Autoriteit implementation of FABEC Free Route Airspace at FL310+ by On 7 December 2017, (NL), Skyguide (CH), 2022. MUAC has achieved its Swiss Air Force (CH) In 2016, the project was organised into two work streams first FRA implementation 1. National and cross‐border Direct Routes (DCT) including successfully (Full FRA at Long Range Direct Routings; night). 2. Free Routing. All Free Route initiatives conducted locally, bilaterally or within a FABEC framework are under the FABEC FRA umbrella. Implementation activities are managed at ACC or national level using local management processes and are monitored at FABEC level. In December 2017 the Project Management Plan version 4.0 has been approved. The project is now further supporting and monitoring the direct routing implementations and full FRA implementations. Next to this, the project team is also working on specific tasks like e.g. horizontal flight efficiency improvement of most‐penalized city pairs.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 54 Released Issue 4.3. Regional projects
Main regional project is the French Italian DSNA/ENAV COFLIGHT system, which will be the new generation of ATM FDP system with electronic environment and fully compliant with ATM Master Plan.
COFLIGHT Organisation(s): DSNA (FR), ENAV (IT) Type of project: Regional Schedule: Procurement has been awarded in October 2011. Commissioning is planned in pilot ACCs between 2019 and 2021. Status: Initial trials performed successfully in December 2012. First deployment in pilot ACCs in June 2016 and associated first operation trial in Q1 2017‐ Description: New generation ATM FDP system COFLIGHT, electronic environment and fully compliant with ATM Master Plan Link and references ATM MP links: L3: ATC07.1, ITY‐AGDL Other links: ASBU : B0‐RSEQ B0‐TBO Project included in RP2 ‐ Name/Code in RP2 ‐ Performance Plan: Performance Plan: Project included in ‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐ DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: ‐ Environment: Environmental performance improvement through enhanced flight plan and trajectory management. Capacity: Capacity performance improvement through enhanced flight plan and trajectory management. Cost‐efficiency: Better cost efficiency through shared development and maintenance costs Operational efficiency: ‐ Cooperation Activities: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 55 Released Issue 5. Cooperation activities
5.1. FAB Co‐ordination
FAB Europe Central (FABEC) consists of the following states: Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The FABEC Feasibility Phase (2006‐2008) led to the conclusion that FABEC is feasible. The Implementation Phase (2008‐2013) demonstrated that the FABEC structure was compliant with SES regulations. After the ratification of the FABEC Treaty by all FABEC States, FABEC formally entered into force on the 1st of June 2013. This means that FABEC is now operational. FABEC intends to deliver on the goals set by SES II and as laid down in the FABEC Performance Plan. FABEC intends to provide capacity, solve bottlenecks, reduce costs and emissions, make flying more efficient and ensure military mission effectiveness, while maintaining the high safety standards that exist over Europe.
5.2. Regional cooperation Regional cooperation initiatives
Continuous cooperation relating to coordination and transfer procedures, airspace and route planning, etc., normally takes place between adjacent States, in accordance with ICAO SARPs and PANS. This cooperation is, among other issues, focused towards implementation of the ECAC Objectives and is complementary to the work undertaken for implementation of the European ATM Master Plan. More specific cooperation/coordination arrangements, which may be useful in coordinating Local Actions between adjacent States, are highlighted below. The ATM Master Plan, its level 3 ESSIP components and the Pilot Common Project provide the main framework on which these Regional Plans rely. In addition to the involvement in the FABEC initiative, the bilateral or multilateral coordination arrangements already set up by DSNA are the following: Joint AEFMP Harmonization Plan (Algeria‐Spain‐France‐Morocco‐Portugal) (2002), which replaced the formers EFP Harmonization Plan (1991) and AEFMP Harmonization Plan (1996), Member of A6 (ENAIRE, DFS, DSNA, ENAV, NATS, PANSA, COOPANS), Coordination with the 6‐States/EUROCONTROL (Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, United Kingdom), SOUTH‐WEST AXIS, to improve ATM capacity and reduce delays in the area of Switzerland, Northern‐ Italy, Northern Eastern Spain, France and United Kingdom with EUROCONTROL collaboration, Member of ESSP (European Satellite Service Provider) EGNOS, Member of the SESAR JU, Member of ANSPs cooperations for system developments such as New Voice Communication System implementation and ATM system developments, Member of the SESAR Deployment Alliance that drive the Deployment of SESAR as “SESAR Deployment Manager”.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 56 Released Issue DSNA, ENAV and various other partnerships DSNA is involved in two major projects in partnership with ENAV: The aim of COFLIGHT is to implement with ENAV a new FDP system that will be compliant to SES interoperability regulation. Following the definition phase, the realization of the COFLIGHT software has started in 2006, and several versions have been delivered to the Customer. Based on Coflight, DSNA and its partners ENAV, skyguide and Malta Air Traffic Service has launched the “Coflight Cloud Services” (formerly known as “Coflight As a service” project in 2014. The objective is to rely on the Coflight product to provide FDP remotely service and system’s maintenance to other ANSPs. The objective of 4‐FLIGHT is the specification with ENAV of the next generation of the ATM system in order to prepare SESAR convergence. This new generation of ATM system will be based on an existing supplier line of product in 2 steps: the first one with a new architecture and very advanced functions, and the second one fully compliant with the SESAR CONOPS. Step 1: implementation is planned in 2020 Step 2: implementation is planned in 2024. The contract has been awarded in October 2011. Common specification and procurement with Maastricht ACC (MUAC) of a next generation VCS (Voice Communications System). o In 2008, a working group of FABEC members developed the specifications for a new VCS (Voice Communication System) taking into account the needs of the FABEC ANSPs as well as the evolutions towards new common functional needs such as the management of the radio and the telephone on the same VCS or to technological evolutions such as the transport of the voice communications under IP. o Following the preparation of these specifications, DSNA and MUAC/EUROCONTROL (Maastricht ACC Center) decided to collaborate to conduct a tender procedure for the development, supply and maintenance of New VCS (NVCS Project). A cooperation agreement has been drawn up between MUAC and DSNA to determine the rules for collaboration between the two organizations. One of the characteristics of this cooperation agreement was that a 20‐year framework agreement would be awarded in partnership between MUAC and DSNA and that the tendering procedure would be carried out by DSNA, according to the rules of the French Public Procurement Code. o The framework agreement offers the possibility for other FABEC ANSPs, if they wish, to integrate the cooperation agreement and to benefit rapidly of a NVCS system “ready for use”, compliant with European regulation and using state of the art technologies as well as from all the services offered by Framework agreement under the same conditions as the DSNA and MUAC. o The NVCS project enable DSNA, MUAC to satisfy the following objectives: . Purchasing of NVCS primary and backup systems under a common framework contract . Implement an advanced Voice Communications System capable of delivering voice services over any possible telecom infrastructure in the foreseeable future. . Support a coordinated transition from TDM (Time Division Multiplexing) based switching to Voice over IP (VoIP) among different Air Navigation Services Providers (ANSPs). . Increased cost‐effectiveness of the ANSP’s investments as a result of scale effects in the acquisition process as well as during the maintenance phase. o The perimeter of NVCS project in DSNA is to replace main and backup radio/ telephone chains eof th five French ACC and also replace Back up VCS for CDG airport. o Brest ACC will be the first of five DSNA area control centers (ACCs) to be equipped with Main and Backup NVCS. Implementation is planned for 2020. o Bordeaux ACC project was launched in 2017; contract has been notified on November 2017. Aix‐en‐Provence, Reims and Paris ACCs will follow.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 57 Released Issue o NVCS Backup will replace current radio and telephone backup at CDG Airport. Radio backup functionalities will be taken into service in 2018. Full operational capabilities (radio and telephone) are planned for 2019.
Even for smaller projects DSNA gives more importance to partnership with European ANSPs: Development of a common Safety Nets Product with DFS; Interconnection with the SETINET Network with Skyguide; Common specification and procurement with Skyguide of an AMHS compliant message switching system (MESANGE: MESsagerie Aéronautique de Nouvelle GEnération) leading to system implementation in 2016;
ESSP DSNA is a shareholder of the ESSP SAS Company established in Toulouse in 2009, along with other European ANSPs (DFS, ENAIRE, ENAV, NATS, NAV‐P, skyguide). The main aim of the cooperation between these seven ANSPs is having ESSP operating the EGNOS infrastructure and delivering several services, in particular the EGNOS Safety of Life service used by aviation to provide LPV approaches over Europe. The governance of the ESSP is ensured by a Board of Directors where shareholders are represented. The Board of Directors meets on a quarterly basis and it is supported by the CEO of the company, as well as by the financial and strategic direction. ESSP has won in 2014 the EGNOS operating contract for 8 years, following a competitive call for tender managed by GSA, the European GNSS Agency. ESSP is now an established and a key player in Europe in the field of satellite navigation services. ESSP is also developing business and consulting activities in several areas, ranging from expanding EGNOS services and user communities, to managing pan European networks
A6 Alliance The “A6 Alliance” was set up informally in 2007 between the ANSPs interested in accession to SJU membership, i.e.: - ENAIRE, the Spanish ANSP; - DFS, the German ANSP; - DSNA, the French ANSP; - ENAV, the Italian ANSP; - NATS, the British ANSP; - NORACON, (the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium).
After the successful cooperation for accession to SJU membership, it was decided to formalize the A6 Alliance through a Memorandum of Cooperation which was concluded in June 2011.
The aim of the cooperation and coordination between the 6 parties was to provide customer value through improving the ATM performance at a European Network Level and increasing the pace of delivering the Single European Sky. The main areas of cooperation relate to general fields of mutual interest (e.g. best practice, harmonized strategy etc.), the SESAR R&D phase and SESAR deployment phase.
The governance of the A6 Alliance is ensured by a Steering Board composed of CEOs which meets on a quarterly basis and is supported by a Strategy Board composed of senior managers. An R&D Working Group and a Deployment Working Group organize co‐operation at expert level.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 58 Released Issue The A6 Alliance quickly became an important player and a key stakeholder of the Single European Sky and has made significant and remarkable contributions to the SESAR JU, for example on the occasion of the ATM Master Plan Updates (editions 2012 and 2015).
PANSA became then a full member of the A6 Alliance, which also developed a close partnership with the COOPANS3 ANSPs, and a strong relationship with the A4 (Airlines) and the SDAG (airports) which has resulted in the setup of an industry led consortium (SESAR Deployment Alliance (SDA)). On December, 5th 2014, the European Commission tasked the SDA with the setup of the SESAR Deployment Manager, thus strengthening its legitimacy in actively contributing to SESAR deployment.
This partnership between ANSPs led to the formal integration of COOPANS into the A6 Alliance for SESAR Deployment Manager activities in 2015 and, strengthened by its wide membership, the A6 Alliance members has been able since then to provide significant support either in logistics or in human resources to the SESAR Deployment Manager.
The A6 Alliance leads European‐wide technical activities validated and co‐funded by the EC for their consistency with the SES framework. Through the EC Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) financial program, successive proposals and actions driven by the SESAR Deployment Manager allowed significant contributions to ATM industry implementation projects within SESAR Common Projects deployment priority (currently only Pilot Common Project – PCP).
Moreover, in the context of SESAR2020, the B44 Consortium joined the A6 Alliance in 2015 and, after having been associated through an agreement established with A6 Alliance in order to authorize exchanges between their experts in the domain of R&D, Skyguide became by the end 2017 a full member of A6 through an ad‐hoc consortium agreement with DSNA.
Finally the A6, associated for the purpose to ROMATSA (Romanian ANSP) and HungaroControl (Hungarian ANSP) and in cooperation with its A4 and SDAG partners, prepared in 2017 the establishment of SDA consortium into an AISBL5 that became effective on 01/01/2018, for the benefit of the whole ATM industry and their end customers.
Regional AEFMP Framework
The AEFMP initiative was set up in 1996 in order to harmonize and optimize the air navigation operations among Algeria, Spain, France, Morocco and Portugal. It aims at promoting the establishment of common regional convergence objectives in order to increase safety and achieve a high operational efficiency in the provision of services. The collaboration was renewed in 2002 with the signature of a Joint AEFMP Plan. After 14 years of fruitful cooperation among the five countries, the AEFMP MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) was signed in January 2016, and publicly ratified during the WAC (World ATM Congress) held in Madrid, in March 2016, with the attendance of representatives of the European Commission. The renewed framework of cooperation includes updated leading principles and reinforced cooperation to face current and future ATM (Air Traffic Management) developments steaming from the SES (Single European Sky) framework evolution. During 2017, the AEFMP celebrated the 15th Anniversary of this long lasting initiative and all the members took the opportunity to highlight the regional ATM institutional environment evolutions achieved during AEFMP’s life.
3 ACG, Croatia Control, IAA, LFV and Naviair together form the COOPANS Alliance Innovative Network 4 PANSA, ANS CR, LPS SR and Oro Navigacija together form the B4 Consortium 5 “Association Internationale Sans But Lucratif », under Belgian law
LSSIP Year 2017 France 59 Released Issue AEFMP is particularly focused on harmonization of procedures, improvement of interoperability and management of implementation of new systems. Accordingly, the main AEFMP objectives are to: • coordinate and collaborate on the operational and technical enablers’ alignment; • harmonize and optimize the deployment timeline of the operational and technical enablers; • push towards more interoperable systems; • optimize the traffic flows across the AEFMP area; and • interconnect ATM systems, share data stemming from AEFMP facilities and systems.
The main achievements of the AEFMP have been the result of the collaboration in the following areas: • Optimum use of Technical Systems: technical optimization is considered essential to provide the users with systems aimed at improving or maintaining performance through synchronized interoperable technology deployment. Likewise, the main general objectives are to: o establish systems and common protocols allowing a reliable, quick and effective exchange of information between operational centres; o share data stemming from technical premises between cross‐border units, when pertinent; o share technical knowledge and experience between AEFMP ANSPs and propose new technical ways of improving CNS/ATM systems.
• Optimum use of Airspace: common methods and procedures as well as operational changes have been and shall be assessed considering the impact on global performance and in order to optimize the use of the AEFMP airspace by its users. Also, some of the general objectives are to: o study and elaborate common working methods for the area, as well as establishing support systems necessities; o establish common criteria for airspace organization and co‐ordination of adjacent units in order to avoid bottlenecks; o analyse delays in the AEFMP area and propose joint measures in order to reduce delays in the area.
AEFMP areas of work include inter‐FAB and other non AEFMP countries collaboration activities, with the aim to promote SES objectives to EU neighbouring airspaces in Western Mediterranean. It is worth to highlight the close cooperation of AEFMP with OACA (Air Navigation Service Provider of Tunisia) whose representatives were welcomed and attended the AEFMP Working Groups and Sub Groups meetings as observers during years 2016 and 2017, witnessing OACA willingness to join AEFMP membership.
For further information on AEFMP please consult our website: www.aefmp‐atm.org.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 60 Released Issue 6. Implementation Objectives Progress
6.1. State View
Overall Objective Implementation
2; 2% 2; 2% Completed
Ongoing
25; 28% 35; 38% Planned
Late
No Plan 6; 7% 21; 23% Not Applicable
Country related objectives
The status of compliance, achievements and main points of concerns for ESSIP objectives applicable to France can be summarized as follows regarding country related 34 applicable objectives:
10 objectives are already completed:
- AOM13.1, Harmonise Airt Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling - AOM19.1, ASM Support Tools to support Advanced FUA (AFUA) - AOM21.1, Direct Routing - ATC02.2, Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 - ATC02.8, Ground‐based Safety Nets - ATC2.9, Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (SCTA) for TMAs - FCM01, Implement enhanced tactical flow management services - INF04, Implement integrated briefing - ITY‐COTR, Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes - NAV03, RNAV 1
LSSIP Year 2017 France 61 Released Issue
16 objectives are considered as late:
- AOM19.2, ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data - ATC15.1, Information Exchange with En‐Route Support of AMAN - ATC16, ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 - ATC17, Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer - COM12 New Pan‐European Network Service (NewPENS) - FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning - FCM4.1, Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1 - FCM08, Extended Flight Plan - INF07, Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) - ITY‐ACID, Aircraft identification - ITY‐ADQ, Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information - ITY‐AGDL, Initial ATC air‐ground data link services - ITY‐AGVCS2, 8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL195 - ITY‐FMTP, Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) - NAV10, APV procedures - SAF11, Improve Runway Safety Preventing Runway Excursions
Delays impacting the full achievement of these objectives are linked to two ongoing major national projects and investments for the renewal of legacy systems: CSSIP program for deployment of a new network infrastructure enabling for voice and data over IP, and 4‐Flight for transition to a new SESAR compliant ATM system including final Data‐Link capabilities (as from 2018), for which a new implementation plan has been presented by DSNA to the Users and to the Commission. Regarding ADQ, AGVCS2 and eTOD implementations, delays are mainly due to the complexity of implementation and the coordination of the numerous stakeholders (airports operators for example with the necessary revision of current working agreements).
1 objective has no plan (NAV3.2, RNP 1 in TMA Operations). This is due to the fact the performance of reversion in case of GNSS failure should be studied further before planning the implementation of RNP1 + RF.
The 10 remaining objectives are ongoing or planned and are progressing according to the implementation milestones.
Airports related objectives
All airports operators of the four coordinated French airports (Paris Roissy‐CDG, Paris Orly, Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry, Nice‐Côte d’Azur) have provided data together with DTA, DSAC, DSNA and DIRCAM. Compliance has also been assessed for the two other LSSIP French airports involved (Toulouse‐Blagnac, Marseille‐Provence).
The two environmental objectives are completed (CDAs planned or in place in these six airports, environmental management in place between all involved stakeholders of those airports).
AMAN tools and procedures are implemented according to the related objective in the 3 concerned French airports (Paris‐Orly, Paris‐Roissy‐CDG and Nice‐Côte d’Azur).
LSSIP Year 2017 France 62 Released Issue
Paris Roissy‐CDG is labelled A‐CDM since November 2010 (FUM process implementation in February 2013 and procedures in adverse conditions including de‐icing prior to end 2013). Paris‐Orly CDM has been implemented 17th November 2016. Lyon‐Sain‐Exupéry is labelled A‐CDM since November 2016 and A‐CDM at Nice‐Côte d’Azur has an implementation scheduled end 2018 (Advanced Tower Concept implemented in 2017). No A‐ CDM implementation is planned in Toulouse‐Blagnac and Marseille‐Provence airports but The Advanced Tower Concept implementation is under study.
A‐SMGCS level 1 and level 2 objectives are completed for both major Paris airports but, A‐SMGCS level 1 is also implemented at Nice‐Côte d’Azur and Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry airports but, due to the level of required investments (mainly surveillance systems), achievement of the A‐SMGCS level 1 is late for other airports. Nevertheless the projects are ongoing and full implementation is planned in 2019.
Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing, Initial Airport Operations Plan objectives are planned and are progressing according to the implementation milestones.
Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring objective is late at Paris and Nice‐Côte d’Azurs due to the deployment of SYSAT (new ATM system for TMAs) expected mid‐2021.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 63 Released Issue
Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature
Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C.
Legend:
## % = Expected completion / % Progress = ESSIP Timeline (different colour per KF)
100% = Objective Completed = Completion beyond ESSIP Timeline
Optimised ATM Network Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and 100% AOM13.1 General Air Traffic (GAT) handling 100% AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA
70% AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data
Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM 70% AOM19.3 (PCP) Information Sharing 100% FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services
62% FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning
97% FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1
28% FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2
17% FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP
80% FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment
LSSIP Year 2017 France 64 Released Issue
Advanced Air Traffic Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
100% AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing
21% AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace
Local objective AOP14 Remote Tower Services
LFBP ‐ PAU‐PYRENEES 0%
LFMD ‐ CANNES‐MANDELIEU 0%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 0%
100% ATC02.2 STCA En‐Route
100% ATC02.8 Ground‐Based Safety Nets
100% ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs
ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures
LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 100%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 100%
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 100%
Automated Support for Conflict Detection, 36% Resolution Support Information and Conformance ATC12.1 Monitoring Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of 78% ATC15.1 AMAN Arrival Management Extended to En‐route 73% ATC15.2 (PCP) Airspace 100% ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance 25% ATC17 to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Local objective ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T n/a
ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac 100% (Outside Applicability Area) LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry 100%
LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence 100%
LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 100%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 100%
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 100%
Local objective ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations
LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac 80%
LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry 80%
LFML ‐ MARSEILLE‐PROVENCE 80%
LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 80%
LFPG ‐ PARIS‐CHARLES DE GAULLE 80%
LFPO ‐ PARIS‐ORLY 80%
Ground‐Ground Automated Co‐ordination 100% ITY‐COTR Processes 100% NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations
0% NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 65 Released Issue <15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
78% NAV10 APV procedures
Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Local objective NAV12 n/a Rotorcraft
High Performing Airport Operations
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1
LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac 40%
LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry 100%
LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence 16%
LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 100%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 100%
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 100%
AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2
LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac 33%
LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry 20%
LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence 3%
LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 100%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 100%
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 100%
AOP05 Airport CDM LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac n/a (Outside Applicability Area) LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry 100%
LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence n/a (Outside Applicability Area) LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 70%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 100%
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 100%
AOP10 (PCP) Time‐Based Separation
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 0%
AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan
LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac ‐ 0%
LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry 100%
LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence 0%
LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 21%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 30%
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 30%
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC
AOP12 (PCP) Clearances Monitoring LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 5%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 23%
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 23%
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface
AOP13 (PCP) Movement Planning and Routing LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 0%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 0%
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 0%
LSSIP Year 2017 France 66 Released Issue <15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management
LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac 100%
LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry 100%
LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence 100%
LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur 100%
LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport 100%
LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport 100%
Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway 96% SAF11 Excursions
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
76% COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS
Voice over Internet Protocol 80% COM11 (VoIP) 7% COM12 (PCP) NewPENS
5% FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan
100% INF04 Integrated Briefing
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle 51% INF07 Data (eTOD) 90% ITY‐ACID Aircraft Identification
Ensure Quality of Aeronautical 28% ITY‐ADQ Data and Aeronautical Information Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link 81% ITY‐AGDL Services
8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice ITY‐AGVCS2 29% Channel Spacing below FL195
Common Flight Message Transfer 65% ITY‐FMTP Protocol Surveillance Performance and 83% ITY‐SPI Interoperability
LSSIP Year 2017 France 67 Released Issue ICAO ASBU Implementation
The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).
Legend:
= Completed (during 2017 or before) = Missing planning date
= Not applicable = Progress achieved in 2017
<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
100% B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 89%
100% B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2) 68%
Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and 100% B0‐FICE Capacity through Ground‐Ground 63% Integration
100% B0‐DATM Service Improvement through Digital 64% Aeronautical Information Management 100% B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements
100% B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets
100% B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through 92%
100% B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) 89%
100% B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories
100% B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through 81% Planning based on a Network‐Wide view 100% B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 83%
100% B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in
Descent Profiles (CDO) Improved Safety and Efficiency through 100% B0‐TBO the initial application of Data Link En‐ 81% Route
LSSIP Year 2017 France 68 Released Issue
6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress
Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C.
Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: Completed No Plan Ongoing Not Applicable Planned Missing Data Late
Main Objectives
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling AOM13.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 ‐ Current harmonization OAT/GAT rules is completed through close civil‐military cooperation at strategic and tactical levels. New release of RCAM was published 1st november 2016. Any 31/12/2016 further update of EUROAT will be analysed and implemented when relevant. French regulation includes RCA4 Decree aiming at defining rules ensuring compatibility between GAT and OAT. REG (By:12/2018) Mil. Global harmonization OAT/GAT process is well advanced Completed ‐ 100% Authority with close civil‐military cooperation. 31/12/2011 The global harmonization process is well advanced, due Completed to permanent dialogue between State aviation and Civil aviation authorities, in order to apply as far as possible DGAC ‐ 100% common principles. It is formalized inside OAT rules 01/11/2016 (RCAM) and OAT/GAT compatibility rules (RCA/4). RCAM was published 1st November 2016 ASP (By:12/2018) The trials conducted in Reims ACC in 2013 were Completed DSNA ‐ 100% successful, and a "type II CMCC" has been implemented. 31/12/2016 Mil. The trials conducted in Reims ACC in 2013 were Completed ‐ 100% Authority successful, and a "type II CMCC" has been implemented. 31/12/2012 MIL (By:12/2018) The global harmonization process is well advanced, due Completed to permanent dialogue between State aviation and Civil Mil. aviation authorities, in order to apply as far as possible ‐ 100% Authority common principles. It is formalized inside OAT rules 01/09/2016 (RCAM) and OAT/GAT compatibility rules (RCA/4). RCAM was published 1st November 2016
LSSIP Year 2017 France 69 Released Issue ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: AOM19.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 ‐ French AMC (called CNGE) is using its own appropriate support systems (e.g. COURAGE, ...). Moreover, LARA is used since February 2017 but some major software issues are not sold and 01/02/2017 significant evolution is needed. ASP (By:12/2018) French AMC (called CNGE) is using its own appropriate Completed support systems (e.g. COURAGE ...). Moreover, LARA is used since February 2017 but some major software issues are not sold and significant evolution is needed. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA ‐ 100% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 01/02/2017 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: AOM19.2 70% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 ‐ 4FLIGHT system will exchange data directly with NM. Exchanges with local ASM systems are 31/12/2024 not yet precisely identified. ASP (By:12/2021) 4Flight system will exchange data directly with NM. Late Exchanges with local ASM systems are not yet precisely identified. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 70% 31/12/2024 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 70 Released Issue
Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: AOM19.3 70% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 ‐ LARA will support the ASM/ATFCM process in France. For improving rolling process, NM 31/12/2021 system misses implementation of permanent Procedure 3. ASP (By:12/2021) LARA supports the ASM/ATFCM process in France. For Ongoing improving rolling process, NM system misses implementation of permanent Procedure 3. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 70% 31/12/2021 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
Direct Routing Timescales: AOM21.1 100% Completed Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 ‐ Full implementation on the objective is done through the deployment of ERATO in Brest and Bordeaux. Current systems in other French ACCs allows implementation of direct routings. 31/12/2016 4FLIGHT system is expected to be deployed in Marseille, Reims and Paris allowing further application of DRA concept. ASP (By:12/2017) Many DCTs have been published and are operated daily. Completed It's a permanent action to increase their amount and availability. The deployment status and planning of this Free Route DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Airspace 31/12/2016 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 71 Released Issue
Free Route Airspace Timescales: AOM21.2 21% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 ‐ Free Route Airspace Implementation is being studied in the FABEC framework. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) Free Route Implementation is being studied in the Ongoing FABEC framework and in collaboration with NM. The project Free Route Airspace is ongoing. The deployment status and planning of this Free Route DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 21% Airspace 31/12/2021 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 40% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac System planned for operations by 30/09/2019 30/09/2019 REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL Late have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A‐ SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline DGAC ‐ 10% for future regulation if deemed necessary. 30/09/2019
Acceptable Means of Compliance with Interoperability Regulation (EC 552/2004) is provided through the ETSI Community Specification EN 303 213‐1 for A‐SMGCS Level1 ASP (By:12/2011) The surface movement radar (SMR) is available Late Mode S multi‐lateration software and hardware is installed. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 63% 30/09/2019 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) Aéroport de Late Toulouse‐ System planned for operations by 31/05/2019 ‐ 37% 31/05/2019 Blagnac
LSSIP Year 2017 France 72 Released Issue Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry A‐SMGCS Level 1 was declared operational in Lyon in september 2014 30/09/2014 REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL Completed have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A‐ SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline for future regulation if deemed necessary.
DGAC However a basis is French RCA 3, 10.4.2.1.3 ‐ 100% 30/09/2014 (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder).
Local order (arrêté de police) mandates the carriage of required aircraft equipment.
An AIC has been published (AIC 16/13) regarding multilateration procedures validation at Lyon. ASP (By:12/2011) SMR is already available. A‐SMGCS Level 1 using Mode S Completed multilateration has been installed in Lyon. System is in operational use since september 2014. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 100% 30/09/2014 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) Aéroports Completed A‐SMGCS Level 1 done by DSNA September 2014. ‐ 100% de Lyon 30/09/2014
LSSIP Year 2017 France 73 Released Issue
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 16% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence System planned for operations mid 2019 30/06/2019 REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL Not have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations Applicable in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A‐ SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline for future regulation if deemed necessary. Acceptable Means of Compliance with Interoperability Regulation (EC 552/2004) is provided through the ETSI Community DGAC Specification EN 303 213‐1 for A‐SMGCS Level1. ‐ % ‐ However a basis is French RCA 3, 10.4.2.1.3 (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder).
Local order (arrêté de police) will mandate the carriage of required aircraft equipment.
AIP procedures publication will be done in due time. ASP (By:12/2011) The surface movement radar (SMR) has been installed in Late 2012 and was in service in 2015. System with ModeS multilateration is planned for full operations by end 2019. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA ‐ 0% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 30/06/2019 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) Aéroport de Late Marseille System planned for operations in 2016 ‐ 37% 30/06/2019 Provence
LSSIP Year 2017 France 74 Released Issue
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur Completed in 2015 30/10/2015 REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL Completed have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A‐ SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline for future regulation if deemed necessary. DGAC ‐ 100% 30/10/2015 However a basis is French RCA 3, 10.4.2.1.3 (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder).
Local order (arrêté de police) mandates the carriage of required aircraft equipment. ASP (By:12/2011) The surface movement radar (SMR) and Multilateration Completed ModeS have been installed in 2013 and in service in April 2015. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 100% 30/04/2015 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) Aéroports Completed de Nice‐ Completed in 2015 ‐ 100% 30/10/2015 Côte d'Azur
LSSIP Year 2017 France 75 Released Issue
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport A‐SMGCS Level 1 implementation ongoing at CDG.
31/12/2009 This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL Completed have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A‐ SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline DGAC ‐ 100% for future regulation if deemed necessary. However a 31/12/2009 basis is French RCA 3, 10.4.2.1.3 (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder). Procedures have been published in the AIP ARR/DEP chapter 10.2. An AIC was also been published for multilateration in 2004 (AIC 02/04). ASP (By:12/2011) A‐SMGCS Level 1 implementation ongoing at CDG Completed This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 100% 31/12/2002 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) A‐SMGCS Level 1 is in operation at CDG airport since Completed 2002.
Groupe ADP This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned ‐ 100% 31/12/2002 with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 76 Released Issue
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport A‐SMGCS Level 1 implemented at Orly since 2007.
31/12/2007 This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. REG (By:12/2010) At this stage neither ICAO nor EASA or EUROCONTROL Completed have produced consistent provisions and/or regulations in all the areas impacted by the introduction of A‐ SMGCS, especially with regard to aerodromes. Need for improved guidelines are recognized and ongoing work within ICAO groups and EASA could provide a baseline for future regulation if deemed necessary. DGAC ‐ 100% 31/12/2007 However a basis is French RCA 3, 10.4.2.1.3 (requirement for equipment and activation of mode S transponder).
Local order (arrêté de police) mandates the carriage of required aircraft equipment. ASP (By:12/2011) A‐SMGCS Level 1 already in service at Orly since 2007. Completed The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also ‐ 100% 31/12/2007 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2010) A‐SMGCS Level 1 implemented at Orly since 2007. Completed
This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned Groupe ADP ‐ 100% with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting 31/12/2007 regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 77 Released Issue
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐ SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 33% Late Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac A‐SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Toulouse end 2019 30/09/2019 ASP (By:12/2017) Due to existing experience in operational use of SMR, a Late direct transition to level 2 is planned. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 33% Common Project is redundant because it is also 30/09/2019 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) Aéroport de Not A‐SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Toulouse Toulouse‐ ‐ % Applicable May 2019 Blagnac ‐
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐ SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 20% Late Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry A‐SMGCS Level 2 will be put in operation at Lyon in 2018 30/06/2018 ASP (By:12/2017) A‐SMGCS Level 2 will be put in operation at Lyon by end Late of Q2 2018 after retrofit of the existing A‐SMGCS Level 1 and upgrade of system up to level 2. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 20% 30/06/2018 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) Not Aéroports A‐SMGCS Level 2 equipment will be operational in Lyon ‐ % Applicable de Lyon end 2017 ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 78 Released Issue
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐ SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 3% Late Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence A‐SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Marseille by end of 2019 31/12/2019 ASP (By:12/2017) A‐SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Marseille by Late end of 2019. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 3% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2019 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) Aéroport de Not A‐SMGCS Level 2 planned for operation in Marseille by Marseille ‐ % Applicable end of 2019 Provence ‐
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐ SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 100% Completed Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur A‐SMGCS Level 2 in operation. 30/06/2017 ASP (By:12/2017) The deployment status and planning of this Completed implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also DSNA ‐ 100% provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and 30/06/2017 included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) Aéroports Completed A‐SMGCS Level 2 planned for operations in Nice at the de Nice‐ ‐ 100% mid‐2017. 31/03/2016 Côte d'Azur
LSSIP Year 2017 France 79 Released Issue
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐ SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 100% Completed Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport A‐SMGCS Level 2 implemented at CDG since 2003.
Note that the project has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP 31/12/2003 monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting.
ASP (By:12/2017) A‐SMGCS Level 2 already operational at CDG. Completed The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also ‐ 100% 31/12/2003 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) A‐SMGCS Level 2 implementation ongoing at CDG. Completed
This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned Groupe ADP ‐ 100% with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting 31/12/2003 regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 80 Released Issue
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐ SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 100% Completed Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport A‐SMGCS Level 2 implementation ongoing at ORLY
30/11/2009 This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. ASP (By:12/2017) A‐SMGCS Level 2 operational at Orly. Completed The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also ‐ 100% 30/11/2009 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2017) A‐SMGCS Level 2 implementation ongoing at ORLY Completed
This activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned Groupe ADP ‐ 100% with PCP objectives and DP monitoring: reporting 30/11/2009 regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 81 Released Issue
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Not AOP05 Timescales: % Applicable ‐ not applicable ‐ LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac (Outside Applicability Area) Aéroport de Toulouse aims to implement an Advanced ATC Tower CDM with TOBT, FUM & DPI messages. ‐ Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding this implementation plan. ASP (By:12/2016) Aéroport de Toulouse aims to implement an Advanced Not ATC Tower CDM with TOBT, FUM & DPI messages. Applicable Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding this implementation plan. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA ‐ % implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) Aéroport de Toulouse aims to implement an Advanced Not ATC Tower CDM with TOBT, FUM & DPI messages and Applicable will carry out a call for tender for an assistance of Aéroport de specifications on the 2018 first quarter; goal is to Toulouse‐ develop a CDM web interface with network connection ‐ % Blagnac in the end of 2018. ‐
Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding the implementation plan.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: AOP05 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry The airport has been certified by the Network Manager. 14/11/2017 ASP (By:12/2016) The airport has been certified by Network Manager on Completed 14/11/2017. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 14/11/2017 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) The project has been launched on the 22nd of March Completed Aéroports 2011. It has been frozen in 2013 due to budget ‐ 100% de Lyon constraints at DSNA, and the implementation took place 07/02/2017 on 07/02/2017.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 82 Released Issue Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Not AOP05 Timescales: % Applicable ‐ not applicable ‐ LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence (Outside Applicability Area) Marseille‐Provence is willing to implement ACDM level 1 (or Advance Tower) end 2018. ‐ Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding the implementation plan. ASP (By:12/2016) Marseille‐Provence is willing to implement ACDM level 1 Not (or Advance Tower) end 2018. Applicable Ongoing discussion with DSNA regarding the implementation plan. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA ‐ % implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) Aéroport de During the AMP AODB modification project (in Not Marseille progress), AMP plans to reach ACDM level 1 (or Advance ‐ % Applicable Provence Tower). Target end 2018 ‐
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: AOP05 70% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur Implementation of CDM at Nice is ongoing in cooperation with Nice‐Côte d’Azur. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2016) Implement of the CDM concept at Nice is ongoing at Late DSNA, in cooperation with Nice‐Côte d’Azur. The system will be available on 31/12/2018 and the certification by NM is expected by 30/06/2019. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA ‐ 69% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2018 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) Nice‐Côte d’Azur has planned to implement the CDM Late Aéroports concept. It should be implemented by 31/12/2018: de Nice‐ deployment of the PDS and KPIs is planned in 2017 to be ‐ 71% 31/12/2018 Côte d'Azur continued in 2018 and connection with the DMAN by end 2018.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 83 Released Issue
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: AOP05 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport CDG airport is labellized "Airport‐CDM" since 16th November 2010; CDM procedures in adverse condition implemented 02/2013; FUM process implemented by end 2013 .
30/09/2014 However, this activity has been reviewed in order to be aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring. DPI activities will be updated accordingly to the conclusions of the 3 task forces launched in 2017: A‐CDM HTF, DPI WG & IATA AACG. First outcomes expected in mid‐2018: reporting regarding new actions on PCP project is reported through SDM/DM reporting. ASP (By:12/2016) CDG airport is "Airport‐CDM" since 16th November Completed 2010. The predeparture sequencing tool is under the responsibility of the Airport Operator. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 100% 28/02/2013 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) CDG airport is labellized "Airport‐CDM" since 16th Completed November 2010; CDM procedures in adverse condition implemented 02/2013; FUM process implemented by end 2013 . Groupe ADP However, this activity has been reviewed in order to be ‐ 100% 30/09/2014 aligned with PCP objectives and DP monitoring. DPI activities will be updated accordingly to the conclusions of the 3 task forces launched in 2017 : A‐CDM HTF, DPI WG & IATA AACG. First outcomes expected in mid‐2018
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: AOP05 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport Orly airport has been certified as a CDM airport on November 15th, 2016. 15/11/2016 ASP (By:12/2016) Paris‐Orly airport is Airport‐CDM since November 15th Completed 2016. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 15/11/2016 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2016) Paris‐Orly airport is Airport‐CDM since November 15th Completed Groupe ADP ‐ 100% 2016. 15/11/2016
LSSIP Year 2017 France 84 Released Issue
Time‐Based Separation Timescales: AOP10 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport Work in progress in its definition phase 31/12/2023 REG (By:12/2023) Need for AMAN evolution V3 to be planned: in the Planned DGAC ‐ 0% definition phase. 31/12/2023 ASP (By:12/2023) Because of the higher efficiency it would have, DSNA Planned proposed to deploy TBS in CDG instead of Orly in the PCP revision. No progress has been made in Orly in that perspective. Need for AMAN evolution V3 and SYSAT systems to be planned: in the definition phase. DSNA ‐ 0% The deployment status and planning of this 31/12/2023 implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: AOP11 0% No Plan Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac Implementation of the objective under study. ‐ ASP (By:12/2021) AOP deployment is not yet planned at LFBO: No Plan Implementation of the objective under study. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 0% Common Project is redundant because it is also ‐ provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Aéroport de No Plan Implementation of the objective under study with Toulouse‐ ‐ 0% DSNA. ‐ Blagnac
LSSIP Year 2017 France 85 Released Issue
Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: AOP11 100% Completed Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry DSNA and Aeroports de Lyon provide AOP information thanks to CDM implemention. 14/11/2017 ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA provides initial AOP information to ADL within Completed CDM deployment project. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 14/11/2017 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Aéroports Aeroports de Lyon provides AOP information within Completed ‐ 100% de Lyon CDM deployment project 14/11/2017
Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: AOP11 0% Planned Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence Implementation of the objective under study 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) AOP deployment is not yet planned at LFML: No Plan Implementation of the objective under study. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 0% Common Project is redundant because it is also ‐ provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Aéroport de Planned Marseille Implementation of the objective under study with DSNA ‐ 0% 31/12/2021 Provence
LSSIP Year 2017 France 86 Released Issue
Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: AOP11 21% Ongoing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur A part of AOP information will be provided within CDM deployment project. 31/12/2021 Nice‐Côte d’Azur plans to integrate the relevant information to AOP by end 2021. ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA will provide initial AOP to ACA information within Ongoing CDM deployment project. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 50% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2018 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) A part of AOP information will be provided within CDM Ongoing Aéroports deployment project. de Nice‐ ‐ 12% Nice‐Côte d’Azur plans to integrate the relevant 31/12/2021 Côte d'Azur information to AOP by end 2021.
Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: AOP11 30% Ongoing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport Initial Airport Operations Plan has been launched in 2016. This project is currently under a Call INEA decision. A close coordination will be taken in place with all concerned stakeholders 31/12/2020 Groupe ADP. The full functionalities should be fully implemented by the end of 2020. ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA already provides initial AOP information within Completed CDM systems. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 28/02/2013 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Initial Airport Operations Plan project has been Ongoing Groupe ADP launched in 2016. The FOC is expected by the end of ‐ 7% 31/12/2020 2020.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 87 Released Issue
Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: AOP11 30% Ongoing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport Initial Airport Operations Plan project has been launched in 2016. The FOC is expected by the 31/12/2020 end of 2020. ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA already provides initial AOP information within Completed CDM systems. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 15/11/2016 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Initial Airport Operations Plan project has been Ongoing Groupe ADP launched in 2016. The FOC is expected by the end of ‐ 7% 31/12/2020 2020.
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP12 5% Late Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with the new system SYSAT planned to be 31/12/2022 implemented by the end of 2022 in Nice‐Côte d’Azur. ASP (By:12/2020) The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with Late the new system SYSAT planned to be implemented by the end of 2022 in Nice‐Côte d’Azur. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 7% 30/09/2022 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2020) Aéroports Late de Nice‐ Under DSNA responsibility ‐ 0% 31/12/2022 Côte d'Azur
LSSIP Year 2017 France 88 Released Issue
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP12 23% Late Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with the new system SYSAT planned to be 30/06/2021 implemented at mid‐2021 in Paris CDG Airport. ASP (By:12/2020) The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with Late the new system SYSAT planned to be implemented at mid‐2021 in Paris CDG Airport. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 30% 30/06/2021 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2020) Planned Groupe ADP Under DSNA responsibility ‐ 0% 30/06/2019
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP12 23% Late Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with the new system SYSAT planned to be 30/06/2022 implemented for summer 2022 at Paris Orly Airport. ASP (By:12/2020) The ATC clearances monitoring will be supported with Late the new system SYSAT planned to be implemented for summer 2022 in Paris Orly Airport. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 30% 30/06/2022 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2020) Planned Groupe ADP Under DSNA responsibility ‐ 0% 30/06/2020
LSSIP Year 2017 France 89 Released Issue
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing AOP13 Timescales: 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. 31/12/2023 Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. REG (By:12/2023) Planned DGAC ‐ ‐ 0% 31/12/2023 ASP (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. DSNA ‐ 0% The deployment status and planning of this 31/12/2023 implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing AOP13 Timescales: 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. 31/12/2023 Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. REG (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part DGAC of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of ‐ 0% 31/12/2023 the SYSAT DSNA program. Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. ASP (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. DSNA The deployment status and planning of this ‐ 0% 31/12/2023 implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 90 Released Issue
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing AOP13 Timescales: 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. 31/12/2023 Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. REG (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part DGAC of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of ‐ 0% 31/12/2023 the SYSAT DSNA program. Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. ASP (By:12/2023) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Planned Movement Planning and Routing is foreseen to be part of SYSAT, the new French ATM systems for APPs, part of the SYSAT DSNA program. Commissioning dates for SYSAT are not fully consolidated yet. DSNA The deployment status and planning of this ‐ 0% 31/12/2023 implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
Ground‐Based Safety Nets Timescales: ATC02.8 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 ‐ France has developed and implemented its own APW on 17 APPs. 31/12/2016 ASP (By:12/2016) France has developed and implemented its own APW on Completed 17 APPs. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2016 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 91 Released Issue
Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: ATC02.9 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 ‐ Enhanced STCA were implemented in France end 2011 30/12/2011 ASP (By:12/2020) DSNA long‐standing concerns about safety in terminal Completed areas led to the early development and commissioning of safety nets in the most relevant TMAs. According to local business needs, DSNA TMAs within the scope of the STCA implementation, along with the implementation date, are the following: ‐ LFPG CDG, 2002 DSNA ‐ LFPO ORY, 2002 ‐ 100% 30/12/2011 ‐ LFLL Lyon, 2008 ‐ LFSB Bâle‐Mulhouse, 2009 ‐ LFBO Toulouse, 2009 ‐ LFMN Nice, 2009 ‐ LFML Marseille, 2010 ‐ LFBD Bordeaux, 2010 ‐ LFST Strasbourg, 2011
AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ATC07.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur France has already implemented this tool in Paris‐CDG, Paris‐Orly, Lyon and Nice. 22/06/2015 ASP (By:12/2019) France has implemented this tool in Paris‐CDG, Paris‐ Completed 4Flight / Orly and Lyon‐Saint‐Exupérys and TMAs. Extra 4Flight deployment has been achieved at Nice in June 2015. Defence / The deployment status and planning of this COFLIGHT / DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot 100% Extended 22/06/2015 Common Project is redundant because it is also Arrival provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and Managemen included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring t View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 92 Released Issue
AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ATC07.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport France has already implemented this tool in Paris‐CDG, Paris‐Orly, Lyon and Nice. 31/03/2012 ASP (By:12/2019) The arrival management tools have been implemented 4Flight / Completed at the CDG Airport. 4Flight The deployment status and planning of this Defence / implementation objective as related to the Pilot COFLIGHT / DSNA 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also Extended 31/03/2012 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and Arrival included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring Managemen View. t
AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ATC07.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport France has already implemented this tool in Paris‐CDG, Paris‐Orly, Lyon and Nice. 31/03/2012 ASP (By:12/2019) Arrival management tools are implemented at Orly 4Flight / Completed Airport. 4Flight The deployment status and planning of this Defence / implementation objective as related to the Pilot COFLIGHT / DSNA 100% Common Project is redundant because it is also Extended 31/03/2012 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and Arrival included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring Managemen View. t
LSSIP Year 2017 France 93 Released Issue
Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring ATC12.1 Timescales: 36% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 ‐ The implementation of this objective is planned together with the deployments of ERATO in 2015 and 2016 in Brest ACC and Bordeaux ACC and 4FLIGHT in Paris ACC, Reims ACC and 31/12/2021 Marseille ACC before end 2021. ASP (By:12/2021) The scenario for commissioning of automated support Ongoing within DSNA ACCs is as such: Brest and Bordeaux ACCs to be provided with ERATO (including MTCD and MONA) between 2015 and 2016. Reims, Marseille and Paris ACCs to be provided with 4‐ FLIGHT (including MTCD, MONA and TCT) later on, but 4Flight DSNA before 31/12/2021. 36% Defence 31/12/2021 The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN Timescales: ATC15.1 78% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 ‐ MAESTRO is already compliant to use in En‐Route and is a level1 system, already implemented in the Paris ACC to support AMAN operations of CDG and Orly. Implementation is being 31/12/2018 considered in Marseille ACC for Lyon and Nice TMA by end 2018. ASP (By:12/2017) DSNA has already implemented MAESTRO in Paris ACC Late to support AMAN operations of CDG and Orly TMA for many years (1999). Implementation is being considered AMAN. / in Marseille ACC for Lyon and Nice TMA by end 2018. Extended The deployment status and planning of this DSNA Arrival 78% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2018 Managemen Common Project is redundant because it is also t provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 94 Released Issue
Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace Timescales: ATC15.2 73% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 ‐ The objective should be fully implemented by the end of 2023 31/12/2023 ASP (By:12/2023) ‐ Reims UAC: "4Me" system is ready to accommodate Ongoing any XMAN data provided via webservice. It already serves XMAN LHR and XMAN ZRH, XMAN EGKK is planned in 2018. ‐ Paris ACC: the current situation (Paris CDG/ORY AMAN extended into Paris ACC) is already compliant with the PCP and the operational needs. For Milano, Paris ACC is a potential candidate. Concerning Brussels, planning for definition of implementation schedule is not yet completed by Belgocontrol ‐ Marseille ACC: the deployment of AMAN2SE in Marseille ACC guarantees PCP compliance except for the flow coming from North‐East via Milano ACC. Milano and Roma, Palma de Mallorca and Barcelona: Marseille ACC is a potential candidate. Contact with ENAIRE and ENAV has been established Q4/2016 under the umbrella of FABEC XMAN. ‐ Brest ACC: London LHR: Brest ACC is planned for 2018. DSNA ‐ 73% ‐ Bordeaux ACC: ‐ Palma de Mallorca and Barcelona: 31/12/2023 Bordeaux ACC is a potential candidates. Contact with ENAIRE has been established Q4/2016 under the umbrella of FABEC XMAN. ‐ Paris CDG/ORY APP: DSNA considers that the current situation (AMAN extended into Paris ACC) is already compliant with the PCP and the operational needs. ‐ Nice APP: the deployment of AMAN2SE in Marseille ACC guarantees PCP compliance, except for the flow coming from North‐East via Milano ACC. Initiation of an XMAN project with ENAV is ongoing to cover this North‐ East flow. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 95 Released Issue
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC17 Timescales: 25% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 ‐ Based on implementation of 4‐FLIGHT and ERATO by end of 2021 31/12/2022 ASP (By:12/2018) Due date in: Late 2018 for BREST ACC and BORDEAUX ACC (ERATO). 2020 for REIMS ACC and MARSEILLE ACC (4‐FLIGHT), 2022 for PARIS ACC (4‐FLIGHT), The deployment status and planning of this DSNA ERATO 25% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2022 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: COM10 76% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 ‐ French ANSP: Migration from AFTN to extended AMHS achieved through MESANGE system commissioned by end of 2016. 31/12/2018 Gateways on the Algerian side planned mid‐2019. ASP (By:12/2018) Basic and extended ATSMHS capabilities are available in Completed DSNA MESANGE system procured jointly with Skyguide. CSSIP 100% 31/12/2017 Gateways on the Algerian side planned mid‐2019. Following the civil aviation, Defence will implement the Ongoing Mil. CADAS software, accessing to MESANGE. Procurement ‐ 48% Authority has been launched in summer 2013, implementation 31/12/2018 should be quick.
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: COM11 80% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 ‐ Process of implementation of VoIP has started in order to be fully compliant before end of 31/12/2020 2020. Implemented by DSNA end 2016. ASP (By:12/2020) VoIP implemented by DSNA in main ATS units end 2016. Completed The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also ‐ 100% 31/12/2016 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. Mil. For the military, deployment is planned with Ongoing ‐ 60% Authority implementation of Descartes tool 31/12/2020
LSSIP Year 2017 France 96 Released Issue
New Pan‐European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: COM12 7% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020 ‐ DSNA is associated to NewPENS procurement. CDG will be connected to NewPENS before 2024. 31/12/2024 ASP (By:12/2024) DSNA is associated to NewPENS procurement. Ongoing The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA Common Project is redundant because it is also ‐ 5% 30/11/2019 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2024) Ongoing Groupe ADP ‐ ‐ 10% 31/12/2024
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ENV01 Timescales: 100% Completed ‐ not applicable ‐ LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac (Outside Applicability Area) CDA implemented in Toulouse since 2010. 31/12/2013 ASP (By:12/2013) CDA are completed and in force at LFBO ATCC. Statistics Completed available since 12/2012 and radar vectored CDO with DTG completed. Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1‐ Close path design with AIP publication 2‐ Open path design (This is the main reason for which DSNA LSSIP France is green ‐ ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields ‐ 100% 31/12/2013 with statistics reporting) 3‐ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) Aéroport de Completed Toulouse‐ CDO implementation managed by DSNA ‐ 100% 31/12/2012 Blagnac Completed DSNA ‐ ‐ 100% 31/12/2012
LSSIP Year 2017 France 97 Released Issue Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry CDA implemented in Lyon since 2011. 31/12/2012 ASP (By:12/2013) CDO are in force at LFLL ATCC PansOps procedures in Completed AIS Radar vectored CDO with DTG completed. Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1‐ Close path design with AIP publication 2‐ Open path design (This is the main reason for which LSSIP France is green ‐ ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields DSNA ‐ 100% with statistics reporting) 31/12/2012 3‐ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP. APO (By:12/2013) Aéroports Completed CDO implementation Managed by DSNA. ‐ 100% de Lyon 31/12/2012 Completed DSNA ‐ ‐ 100% 31/12/2012
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence CDA implemented in Marseille since 2011. 31/12/2013 ASP (By:12/2013) CDA are completed and in force at LFML ATCC Completed Statistics available since 12/2012 and radar vectored CDO with DTG completed. Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1‐ Close path design with AIP publication 2‐ Open path design (This is the main reason for which DSNA LSSIP France is green ‐ ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields ‐ 100% 31/12/2013 with statistics reporting) 3‐ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) Completed DSNA ‐ ‐ 100% 31/12/2012 Aéroport de Completed Marseille CDO implementation managed by DSNA ‐ 100% 31/12/2012 Provence
LSSIP Year 2017 France 98 Released Issue
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur CDO are implemented in Nice since 2011. 31/12/2013 ASP (By:12/2013) Radar vectored CDO with DTG completed at LFMN ATCC Completed Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1‐ Close path design with AIP publication. 2‐ Open path design (This is the main reason for which LSSIP France is green ‐ ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields DSNA with statistics reporting). ‐ 100% 31/12/2013 3‐ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication. Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) Completed DSNA CDO implementation managed by DSNA. ‐ 100% 31/12/2012 Aéroports Completed de Nice‐ ‐ ‐ 100% 31/12/2012 Côte d'Azur
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport CDA implemented AT CDG since 2011. 31/12/2012 ASP (By:12/2013) 3 Pans‐Ops CDA under development STAR LORNI in AIS Completed Radar vectored CDA with DTG completed at LFPG ATCC‐ Performance indicators reported Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1‐ Close path design with AIP publication 2‐ Open path design (This is the main reason for which DSNA LSSIP France is green ‐ ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields ‐ 100% 31/12/2012 with statistics reporting) 3‐ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) Completed DSNA CDO implementation Managed by DSNA. ‐ 100% 31/12/2012 Completed Groupe ADP ‐ ‐ 100% 31/12/2011
LSSIP Year 2017 France 99 Released Issue
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport CDA implemented at Orly since 2010. 31/12/2012 ASP (By:12/2013) Pans‐Ops CDA under development for RWY 26 CDA Completed ODRAN ILS 06 in AIS ‐ Radar vectored CDA with DTG completed at LFPG ATCC Performance indicators reported Regarding CDO, accordingly with ICAO Doc 9931, DSNA/ATCC have adopted three CDO design option: 1‐ Close path design with AIP publication 2‐ Open path design (This is the main reason for which DSNA ‐ 100% LSSIP France is green ‐ ATCO perfom CDO at all airfields 30/06/2012 with statistics reporting) 3‐ Path stretching method, Point Merge with AIP publication Option 1 is available when traffic demand is low or upon request during period of time, accordingly with AIP Option 2 is available 24/24 depending of traffic load Option 3 is available 24/24 at ACC Paris sector TP APO (By:12/2013) Completed Groupe ADP ‐ ‐ 100% 31/12/2010 Completed DSNA CDO implementation managed by DSNA. ‐ 100% 31/12/2012
LSSIP Year 2017 France 100 Released Issue
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ENV02 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de 31/12/2012 l'Environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFBO ATCC active participation in formal partnership Completed and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2012 associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 101 Released Issue APO (By:12/2016) LFBO active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local Aéroport de unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of Toulouse‐ ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/10/2012 Blagnac associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 102 Released Issue
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ENV02 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de 31/12/2012 l'Environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFLL ATCC active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2012 associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 103 Released Issue APO (By:12/2016) LFLL active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local Aéroports unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of ‐ 100% de Lyon municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2009 associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 104 Released Issue
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ENV02 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFML ‐ Marseille‐Provence Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de 31/12/2009 l'Environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFML ATCC active participation in formal partnership Completed and controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2009 associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 105 Released Issue APO (By:12/2016) LFML active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local Aéroport de unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of Marseille ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2009 Provence associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 106 Released Issue
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ENV02 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de 31/12/2009 l'Environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFMN active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2009 associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 107 Released Issue APO (By:12/2016) LFMN active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local Aéroports unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of de Nice‐ ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2009 Côte d'Azur associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 108 Released Issue
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ENV02 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFPG ‐ Paris CDG Airport Objective achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de 31/12/2009 l'Environnement" ASP (By:12/2016) LFPG ATCC active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2009 associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 109 Released Issue APO (By:12/2016) LFPG active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of Groupe ADP ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2009 associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 110 Released Issue
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ENV02 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LFPO ‐ Paris Orly Airport Objective mainly achieved through formally established "Commission Consultative de 31/12/2013 l'Environnement". ASP (By:12/2016) LFPO active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of DSNA ‐ 100% municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ 31/12/2009 associations and representatives of associations for the protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 111 Released Issue APO (By:12/2016) LFPO active participation in formal partnership and Completed controllers training completed. According to French law 11th July 1985 regarding Urban Planning in the vicinity of airports, article 2, an Advisory Committee on the Environment (Commission Consultative de l'Environnement) has been created for the airport. Its composition has been set by a prefectural decree and a permanent committee has been established. It is competent for any matters regarding the airport activities impact on environment. Representatives of the airport operator, of the airport users, of the local unions, of neighboring municipalities and regions, of municipalities impacted by airport noise, of residents‐ Groupe ADP ‐ 100% associations and representatives of associations for the 31/12/2013 protection of the environment affected by the airport environment are official members of these committees. The Committee is chaired by a State representative and DGAC experts are involved. At least one meeting a year is required and also ad‐hoc meeting on request. In addition, legal ‐Public Inquiries‐ consultations have been established since 2004 decree for each change or creation of an ATC procedure. Nevertheless, when a public inquiry is not mandatory, an additional information process is run. Creation of a prototype "Filter Marsh" for a bio‐filtration of the deicing contaminated waters since end 2013.
Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: FCM03 62% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 ‐ France participates to this objective for those tasks which are already completed. Processing of FPLs derived from RPLs, of APL and ACH messages already implemented. Full implementation 30/06/2018 of the objective is planned with the new version of ATC system June 2018. ASP (By:12/2017) Processing of FPLs derived from RPLs, of APL and ACH Late messages is already implemented. Some messages are completed but the sending of them has been suspended because of validation issues with CFMU. Implementation of AFP is implemented in new version of ATC system that will be installed in Q1/2018 and DSNA subsequently activated progressively during Q2/2018. ‐ 62% 30/06/2018 The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 112 Released Issue
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1 Timescales: FCM04.1 97% Late Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/10/2017 ‐ Full implementation is expected in all ACCs by October 2018 (Marseille ACC). 31/10/2018 ASP (By:10/2017) Process is completed in 4 ACCs, and work is ongoing in Late the last one. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 97% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/10/2018 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2 Timescales: FCM04.2 28% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 ‐ DSNA has launched a program named SALTO to cover the need of local tool. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) DSNA has launched a program named SALTO to cover Ongoing the need of local tool. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 28% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2021 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 113 Released Issue
Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: FCM05 17% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 ‐ Practical implementation of this ESSIP objective by all concerned stakeholders is ongoing. However, the provision of AOP to NM to perform the integration of the AOP with the NOP is 31/12/2021 only planned in a second phase for 2021. ASP (By:12/2021) Mil. No Plan ‐ ‐ 0% Authority ‐ The deployment status and planning of this Ongoing implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also DSNA ‐ 25% provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and 31/12/2021 included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. APO (By:12/2021) Aéroport de Not Marseille ‐ ‐ % Applicable Provence ‐ Aéroports Planned ‐ ‐ 0% de Lyon 31/12/2021 Aéroports Aéroports de la Côte d’Azur is advanced ATC Tower Planned de Nice‐ since 2016 and will be CDM by end 2018. Moreover, at ‐ 0% 31/12/2021 Côte d'Azur this stage AOP/NOP integration is planned for end 2021 Aéroport de Not Toulouse‐ Within the CDM study project framework (see AOP05). ‐ % Applicable Blagnac ‐ Ongoing Groupe ADP ‐ ‐ 55% 31/12/2021
Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: FCM06 80% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 ‐ Implemented through the framework of SALTO project. 31/12/2019 ASP (By:12/2021) To be implemented through the framework of SALTO Ongoing project. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot DSNA ‐ 80% Common Project is redundant because it is also 31/12/2019 provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 114 Released Issue
Extended Flight Plan Timescales: FCM08 5% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 ‐ Strategical discussions are ongoing in DSNA as to define FF‐ICE implementation projects wrto the new versions of ATM systems: En‐route (4Flight), Approaches (SYSAT) and continental and 31/12/2024 overseas ATM systems & ARO tools. ASP (By:12/2021) Strategical discussions are ongoing in DSNA as to define Late FF‐ICE implementation projects wrto the new versions of ATM systems: En‐route (4Flight), Approaches (SYSAT) and continental and overseas ATM systems & ARO tools. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA ‐ 5% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2024 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: INF07 51% Late Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 ‐ The French regulator has already defined a national TOD policy and translated it into a national regulation for all parties to implement. 31/12/2020 The tools for the provision of collected TOD to third‐parties in compliance with data exchange regulatory requirements will be implemented as from January 2019. REG (By:05/2018) The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in Late DGAC two orders relating to aeronautical information which ‐ 50% 31/12/2018 were published the 23rd of March 2015. ASP (By:05/2018) DSNA defined years ago a roadmap related to current Late DSNA ‐ 70% national TOD policy requirements. 01/01/2019 APO (By:05/2018) Aéroport de Letters of Agreements between SNA‐SSE and AMP has Ongoing Marseille been signed during December 2017 / Requirements and ‐ 70% 31/05/2018 Provence adjustments implementation in progress. The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in Late Aéroports two orders relating to aeronautical information which de Nice‐ were published the 23rd of March 2015. Agreements ‐ 0% 31/12/2018 Côte d'Azur between airports and DSNA are being regularly updated accordingly. The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in Late two orders relating to aeronautical information which Aéroports were published the 23rd of March 2015. Agreements ‐ 0% de Lyon 31/12/2018 between airports and DSNA are being regularly updated accordingly.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 115 Released Issue The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in Late two orders relating to aeronautical information which Groupe ADP were published the 23rd of March 2015. Agreements ‐ 55% 31/12/2020 between airports and DSNA are being regularly updated accordingly. The French TOD regulatory framework is embedded in Late Aéroport de two orders relating to aeronautical information which Toulouse‐ were published the 23rd of March 2015. Agreements ‐ 50% 31/12/2018 Blagnac between airports and DSNA are being regularly updated accordingly.
Aircraft Identification Timescales: ITY‐ACID 90% Late Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 ‐ Main implementation completed mid 2017 31/01/2025 ASP (By:01/2020) Downlinked aircraft identification is in operational use in Completed DSNA ‐ 100% the 5 ACCs. 01/06/2017 Mil. Late Deferred compliance will be achieved in 2025 ‐ 70% Authority 31/01/2025
Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: ITY‐ADQ 28% Late 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 ‐ The French regulator (DTA) is working in coordination with the French NSA (DSAC) in order to implement ADQ‐IR in France. Discussions with DSNA and aerodrome operators have allowed assessing French state of compliance with the regulation. Work remains to be done considering the number of parties involved, including parties outside the scope of the oversight of the NSA. 31/07/2022 The modification of the aeronautical information management regulatory framework the 23rd of March 2015 and the issuance of an ADQ‐IR enforcement roadmap the 16th of June 2015 will support the momentum already initiated towards compliance. REG (By:06/2017) The French regulator (DTA) is working in coordination Late with the French NSA (DSAC) in order to implement ADQ‐ IR in France. Discussions with DSNA and aerodrome operators have allowed assessing French state of compliance with the regulation. Work remains to be done considering the number of parties involved, DGAC ‐ 10% including parties outside the scope of the oversight of 31/12/2021 the NSA. The modification of the aeronautical information management regulatory framework the 23rd of March 2015 and the issuance of an ADQ‐IR enforcement roadmap the 16th of June 2015 support the momentum already initiated towards compliance. Mil. Late Partially compliant with the requirements of July 2013. ‐ 75% Authority 30/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 France 116 Released Issue ASP (By:06/2017) The deployment status and planning of this Late implementation objective as related to the Pilot FABEC AIM Common Project is redundant because it is also DSNA Task Force / 41% provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and 31/07/2022 SOFIA included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. Late
The French regulatory framework complementing IR ADQ related to the implementation or revision of the requirements required a national consultation of the concerned parties run during 2014. The complexity of Mil. the regulation has led to multiple understanding, more ‐ 47% Authority harmonized understanding is expected, and meanwhile 31/12/2018 the EASA is addressing the subject. The system supporting the ADQ requirement must be upgraded or changed with a significant financial, human and technical impact. The two previous points show that the planning aiming at the full compliance was note achieved in July 2017 as scheduled. More delay seems to be needed. No deadline at the moment. APO (By:06/2017) FABEC AIM Late DSNA ‐ Task Force / 10% 31/12/2020 SOFIA Aéroport de Late APO's conformity with ADQ‐IR depends closely on the Toulouse‐ ‐ 10% conformity of French AISP. 31/12/2020 Blagnac Aéroports Late APO's conformity with ADQ‐IR depends closely on the de Nice‐ ‐ 10% conformity of French AISP. 31/12/2020 Côte d'Azur Aéroports APO's conformity with ADQ‐IR depends closely on the Late ‐ 10% de Lyon conformity of French AISP. 31/12/2020 Aéroport de Late APO's conformity with ADQ‐IR depends closely on the Marseille ‐ 10% conformity of French AISP. 31/12/2020 Provence APO's conformity with ADQ‐IR depends closely on the Late Groupe ADP ‐ 10% conformity of French AISP. 31/12/2020
LSSIP Year 2017 France 117 Released Issue
Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services Timescales: ITY‐AGDL Entry into force: 06/02/2009 81% Late ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 ‐ A revised scenario for phased deployment of the DLS in DSNA airspace has been constructed jointly with the European Commission, EUROCONTROL and DSNA Clients (airlines). 31/12/2022 Full capability will be achieved through the commissioning of new French ATM system (4‐ Flight) from 2018 (including ACL availability in all centers) to 2022. REG (By:02/2018) The change related to the introduction of DLS is Ongoing DGAC reviewed by DSAC but must take into account the last ‐ 62% 05/02/2018 DSNA plan of implementation. ASP (By:02/2018) A revised scenario for phased deployment of the DLS in Late DSNA airspace has been constructed jointly with the European Commission, EUROCONTROL and DSNA Clients (airlines). This revised scenario, finalized in June 2013, was based on the legacy system upgrade, the new 4‐Flight system development and implementation program and the results of a costs‐benefit analysis. Because of technical difficulties both in on‐board and ground equipment, the dates planned in the IR 29/2009 were not able to be kept in a general way in Europe. A technical report asked by the European Commission from EASA has led to propose a new date for the DLS: 4Flight / February 2018. 4Flight DSNA 91% DSNA will provide Data Link Service from FL195 and Defence / 31/12/2022 above. An initial set of AGDL services (DLIC, AMC, ACM) COFLIGHT has been commissioned for partial compliance at the end of 2015 in western ACCs and extended to the entire airspace since May 2016. Full compliance (addition of ACL service) will begin end of 2018 (Western ACCs) and will be completed with the 4‐Flight implementation. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View. MIL (By:01/2019) According to IR EC 29/2009, DLS equipage is not Not Mil. 4Flight mandatory for State aircraft. Next aircraft equipped % Applicable Authority Defence with a DLS will be compliant VDL2 ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 118 Released Issue 8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 ITY‐AGVCS2 29% Late Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 ‐ Compliance with the requirements on 8,33 kHz frequency conversions is scheduled. 01/03/2026 REG (By:12/2018) Mil. Late ‐ ‐ 38% Authority 31/12/2025 Process is ongoing for ensuring compliance with the Late DGAC requirements on 8,33 kHz frequency conversion by ‐ 70% 31/12/2025 2026. ASP (By:12/2018) Mil. Late ‐ ‐ 0% Authority 31/12/2025 Late DSNA Upgrading of radio stations is scheduled. ‐ 34% 01/03/2026 MIL (By:12/2020) In accordance with IR EC 1079/2012, some State aircraft Ongoing Mil. and equipment will be upgraded. ‐ 5% Authority Some military frequencies will remain on 25kHz 31/12/2020 according on art 6 paragraph10b. APO (By:12/2018) Aéroport de Ongoing Toulouse‐ ‐ ‐ 7% 31/12/2018 Blagnac Aéroports Planned ‐ ‐ 0% de Lyon 31/12/2018 Aéroports Planned de Nice‐ ‐ ‐ 0% 31/12/2018 Côte d'Azur Ongoing Groupe ADP ‐ ‐ 67% 31/12/2018 Mil. Late The process is ongoing ‐ 13% Authority 31/12/2025 Aéroport de Ongoing Marseille ‐ ‐ 3% 31/12/2018 Provence
LSSIP Year 2017 France 119 Released Issue
Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 ITY‐FMTP 65% Late All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 ‐ Full compliance to the FMTP is expected by end 2018 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2014) Ongoing work within the French program CSSIP. Late The current migration is organized in coordination with the neighboring centers and formalized by means of Letters of Agreement notified to the EC. The new transmission protocol is operational with all DSNA the neighboring centers from first quarter 2016. ‐ 63% 31/12/2018 For security reasons, it is considered preferable to first carry out the transition of all PLN messages from the TDM networks (e.g. SETINET Swiss network) to PENS before carrying out the transition of all PLN messages using PENS from IPv4 format to IPv6 format. IR FMTP doesn't apply to the Military. Nevertheless, Late technical system has been updated to IP in 2013. Mil. Military are compatible to IPV6, and all new equipment ‐ 58% Authority 31/01/2018 is IPv6 compatible. Full migration will be completed 31 January 2018. MIL (By:12/2014) IR FMTP doesn't apply to the Military. Nevertheless, Late technical system has been updated to IP in 2013. Mil. Military are compatible to IPV6, and all new equipment ‐ 75% Authority 31/01/2018 is IPv6 compatible. Full migration will be completed 31st January 2018.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 120 Released Issue
Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 ITY‐SPI 83% Ongoing EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 ‐ Surveillance performance and interoperability implementation is planned in France and is 07/06/2020 progressing accordingly with the Implementing Rule schedule. REG (By:02/2015) As far as the oversight of interoperability is concerned, Completed DSAC applies its own ANSP IOP oversight procedure. DSAC monitors the implementation of each IR through the oversight of DSNA IR synthesis file, DSAC has initially DGAC requested DSNA for a SPI synthesis file for 04/2013. ‐ 100% 22/01/2015 DSNA addressed SPI synthesis file and its conformity plan in 10/2013. IR SPI conformity has been accordingly reviewed by DSAC and the final result has been transmitted to DSNA 22nd January 2015. ASP (By:02/2015) Mil. Ensuring safety of Radar data is one of the highest Completed ‐ 100% Authority priorities for DSNA and DIRCAM. 31/10/2013 Ensuring safety of Radar data is one of the highest Completed priorities for DSNA and DIRCAM. Technical agreements have been in force with our partners from a long time ago for the most critical sensors. A standardized document, (Memorandum of Cooperation between ANSPs) merging all technical agreements dealing with DSNA data exchanges, studied within AEFMP group, was ‐ 100% 31/10/2013 signed in 2012 between ENAIRE (Ex AENA) and DSNA and updated and signed June 2014 to comply with IR SPI. Thanks to close cooperation with DFS, an improved document was signed end‐2015 between DFS and DSNA. Work is in progress to sign such agreements with others neighbors. MIL (By:06/2020) Mil. Equipage is in progress, following the SPI‐IR Ongoing ‐ 53% Authority requirements. 07/06/2020
LSSIP Year 2017 France 121 Released Issue
RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: NAV03.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 ‐ Arrival and departures procedures based on RNAV have been established on main airports. 31/12/2011 For relevant aircraft, implementation of RNAV1 is considered as achieved. ASP (By:12/2023) Mil. Completed ‐ ‐ 100% Authority 31/12/2011 Arrival and departures procedures based on RNAV have Completed been established on major airports. Overall implementation is a continuous action. Military aerodromes are not concerned by congestion. Military aircraft are progressively equipped, following national equipage plans. However equipage is not mandatory. Implementation of RNAV procedures on some military DSNA airbases is an ongoing progress. So for military part, this ‐ 100% 31/12/2011 item can be considered as completed. The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective as related to the Pilot Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: NAV03.2 0% No Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 ‐ The performance of reversion in case of GNSS failure should be studied further before planning ‐ the implementation of RNP1 + RF ASP (By:12/2023) The performance of reversion in case of GNSS failure No Plan should be studied further before planning the implementation of RNP1 + RF. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA implementation objective as related to the Pilot ‐ 0% ‐ Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 122 Released Issue
APV Procedures Timescales: NAV10 78% Late Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 ‐ National deployment plan of APV/SBAS (supported by EGNOS) and APV/Baro has been launched and is ongoing. Consistency with ICAO 3711 has been reached end 2016. This 31/12/2018 implementation Phase ending 2016 has enabled full consistency with ICAO 3711. Full deployment, strictly speaking, of remaining APV will be finished by end 2018. REG (By:04/2016) Completed DGAC EASA material applied to regulatory activities ‐ 100% 30/11/2011 ASP (By:12/2016) In line with the ICAO 37th assembly resolution, a Late national deployment plan at all IFR runways has been set up, and is in progress. Full implementation by the end of 2018. The deployment status and planning of this DSNA PBN APV 70% implementation objective as related to the Pilot 31/12/2018 Common Project is redundant because it is also provided to the SESAR Deployment Manager and included in the Deployment Programme Monitoring View.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 123 Released Issue
Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: SAF11 96% Late Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 ‐ The applicable recommendations have been disseminated to the concerned parties in the end 31/12/2019 of 2013 and will be monitored through the regular reviews of the State Safety Plan REG (By:01/2018) Through its State Safety Plan, DGAC analyzed in early Ongoing 2013 the applicability of the action plan in order to decide the actions to implement, with associated timeframe to monitor. The applicable measures related to ATM/ANS and airport operators’ domains have been DGAC already implemented. The applicable recommendations ‐ 100% 31/01/2018 have been disseminated to the concerned parties in the end of 2013 and will be monitored through the regular reviews of the State Safety Plan. However, no oversight activities are planned for the time being to ensure the implementation of the applicable measures. ASP (By:12/2014) Mil. Completed ‐ ‐ 100% Authority 31/12/2014 EAPPRE was approved in January 2013 by DSNA CEO. Completed For the military, through DGAC's State Safety Plan, as far DSNA as relevant, Armed Forces take account EAPPRE only for ‐ 100% 31/12/2014 military airfield with civilian traffic through the regular reviews of DSAC. APO (By:12/2014) Aéroports Completed ‐ ‐ 100% de Lyon ‐ Late Groupe ADP ‐ ‐ 38% 31/12/2019 Aéroports Completed de Nice‐ ‐ ‐ 100% 31/12/2013 Côte d'Azur Aéroport de Completed Toulouse‐ ‐ ‐ 100% 31/12/2014 Blagnac
LSSIP Year 2017 France 124 Released Issue
Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations ATC02.2 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 ‐ STCA implemented in the five ACCs and majors TMAs. Implementation in smaller TMAs is also a 31/12/2010 major program. ASP (By:01/2013) STCA is implemented in all ACCs and 9 major APPs. Completed DSNA Implementation in smaller APPs is under consideration ‐ 100% 31/12/2010 for the next generation of ATM systems.
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: ATC16 100% Late Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 ‐ Objective has been implemented for DSNA. For the military, equipage is in progress for aircraft 30/12/2018 that should be still in service after 2020 (older aircraft are not planned to be equipped). REG (By:12/2015) Handled through aircraft operators continuous Completed DGAC ‐ 100% oversight. 31/12/2015 ASP (By:03/2012) A monitoring system of the performance of ACAS is in Completed place for many years. Each TCAS occurrence is recorded DSNA ‐ 100% and analyzed. If necessary, pilots/companies are 30/11/2011 informed in case of a non‐conformity. MIL (By:12/2015) Equipage of ACAS II will be conducted for modern Late Mil. transport‐type aircraft. However, aircrews are trained to ‐ 100% Authority 30/12/2018 react, using or not ACAS.
Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: FCM01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 ‐ France participates to the ETFMS programme. Main goals of this objective have been achieved. 31/12/2006 ASP (By:07/2014) Transmission of CPR and FSA messages implemented. Completed FSA messages for route changes are implemented. DSNA There is no intention to implement FSA messages for ‐ 100% 31/12/2006 holding and FDPA re‐routing updates. DPI messages at LFPG since 2010.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 125 Released Issue Implement integrated briefing Timescales: INF04 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 ‐ Integrated briefing functions are available for aircrews 31/01/2003 ASP (By:12/2012) Integrated briefing called OLIVIA is available and Completed compliant with Level 4 (application integration).
Mil. For the military, on airbases, integrated briefing function ‐ 100% Authority is available for military crews. ‐ On airbases receiving civil air traffic, only MET information is proposed to civilian aircraft, ensured by Meteo France. Completed DSNA ‐ ‐ 100% 31/01/2003
Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and ITY‐COTR initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 100% Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 ‐ Compliance to the COTR Implementing Rule is globally achieved (only one minor non‐ compliance is identified and cannot be done in the legacy system, mainly due to lack of 30/06/2016 specification), except for compliance regarding 29/2009 which is addressed under ITY ‐ AGDL ASP (By:12/2012) Completed for the original set of processes, and planned Completed for LOF and NAN processes. Fully compliant with COTR Implementing Rule (except DSNA ‐ 100% for compliance regarding 29/2009 which is addressed 30/06/2016 under ITY‐AGDL) with all neighbors when operationally relevant and when their system‐capability is achieved. MIL (By:12/2012) Mil. Completed Flight data process is done. ‐ 100% Authority 31/12/2012
LSSIP Year 2017 France 126 Released Issue
Local Objectives
Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area. Remote Tower Services AOP14 % Planned Applicability and timescale: Local LFBP ‐ PAU‐PYRENEES A digital advanced tower concept will be implemented at Pau‐Pyrénées airport (LFBP) in order to facilitate a better coordination for approach ATS with departures from Tarbes‐Pyrénées 31/12/2020 (LFBT) airport where a camera network will be implemented.
Remote Tower Services AOP14 % Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local LFMD ‐ CANNES‐MANDELIEU In order to better accommodate local helicopters traffic increase at Cannes Héliport Quai du Large (LFTL), a Digital Advanced Tower concept has been developed and the implementation 31/08/2019 phase has been launched end 2017 at Cannes‐Mandelieu airport (LFMD) in order to visualize and manage heliport movements directly from Cannes‐Mandelieu (LFMD) tower.
Remote Tower Services AOP14 % Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local LFVM ‐ Miquelon Airport
Project has been launched in 2016 and implementation date is 31/10/2018. 31/10/2018
Miquelon traffic will be handled directly from Pointe Blanche at the end of the project.
Multi‐Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Not ATC18 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local ‐ No MSP implementation planned. ‐
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 80% Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local LFBO ‐ Toulouse‐Blagnac CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 80% Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local LFLL ‐ Lyon‐Saint‐Exupéry CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 80% Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local LFML ‐ MARSEILLE‐PROVENCE CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard.
LSSIP Year 2017 France 127 Released Issue
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 80% Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local LFMN ‐ Nice‐Côte d’Azur CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 80% Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local LFPG ‐ PARIS‐CHARLES DE GAULLE CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 80% Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local LFPO ‐ PARIS‐ORLY CCO is an aircraft operating technique (Doc 9993) enabled by DSNA on a daily basis by tactical ATCo instructions and clearances. Performance assessments are done on a regular basis and 31/12/2018 reported in performance dashboard.
Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Not NAV12 % Applicable Applicability and timescale: Local ‐ No Optimised Low‐Level IFR routes in TMA for Rotorcraft implementation plan to report. ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 France 128 Released Issue
ANNEXES
ANNEX A ‐ Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process
LSSIP Co‐ordination
LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name
LSSIP National Focal Point for France DTA Jean‐Jacques BLANCHARD Jean‐Jacques BLANCHARD LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA DTA Stéphane LAFOURCADE LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP DSAC Bérioska MARCHANT LSSIP Focal Point for Airport DSNA Eric LIEUTAUD LSSIP Focal Point for Military DSAÉ Yann PICHAVANT
EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support
Function Directorate Name
LSSIP Contact Person for France DECMA/PEPR Jorge PINTO
LSSIP Year 2017 France 129 Released Issue
Implementation Objectives
Implementation EUROCONTROL PEPR EUROCONTROL Objective National Stakeholder Objective Objective Coordinator Owners Specialist
AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI Estelle LE GUILCHER G. ACAMPORA / AOM19.1 O. ALFARO Estelle Le GUILCHER O. MROWICKI G. ACAMPORA / AOM19.2 O. ALFARO Estelle Le GUILCHER O. MROWICKI G. ACAMPORA / AOM19.3 O. ALFARO Fabrice ETARD O. MROWICKI AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Jérôme DUFOSSEZ AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Jérôme DUFOSSEZ AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Frédéric CHUPEAU AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Frédéric CHUPEAU AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE Erwan PAGE Ravo AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM RANDRIA AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE Erwan PAGE AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Ravo RANDRIA AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Frédéric CHUPEAU AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE Erwan PAGE ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Frédéric CHUPEAU ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Frédéric CHUPEAU ATC07.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Ali SAHI ATC12.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Yannick MESTON ATC15.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Ali SAHI ATC15.2 L. DELL’ORTO P. HOP Gérald REGNIAUD ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO S. MORTON Bruno SPYCKERELLE ATC18 L. DELL’ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI Bruno SPYCKERELLE COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU Philippe KERLIRZIN COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU Philippe KERLIRZIN COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS Daniel LENNON ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN Alain BOURGIN ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY Alain BOURGIN ENV03 A‐P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN Alain BOURGIN C. BOUMAN/I. FCM03 O. CIOARA Olivier GELARD PENDACHANSKI FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Estelle Le GUILCHER FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Estelle Le GUILCHER I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. FCM05 O. CIOARA Estelle LE GUILCHER PENDACHANSKI
LSSIP Year 2017 France 130 Released Issue FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Estelle Le GUILCHER FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI Olivier TEYSSANDIER INF07 A‐P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY Sébastien TANGUY ITY‐ACID O. CIOARA pending Bruno SPYCKERELLE ITY‐ADQ A‐P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER Sébastien TANGUY ITY‐AGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC Sylvie CHAMBON ATY‐AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET Daniel LENNON ITY‐FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU Philippe KERLIRZIN ITY‐SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY Ravo RANDRIA NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Sophie BARANES NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Sophie BARANES NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH Sophie BARANES NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET Sophie BARANES SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending Hervé FORESTIER
LSSIP Year 2017 France 131 Released Issue ANNEX B ‐ National Stakeholders Organisation charts
LSSIP Year 2017 France 132 Released Issue
LSSIP Year 2017 France 133 Released Issue
LSSIP Year 2017 France 134 Released Issue ORGANIGRAMME DIRCAM
DIRCAM Director BG** Pierre REUTTER Deputy: COL Marc LAPIERRE
SDEA SDR SDSA LTC Luc ANTOON LCL François CLEMENT COL Vianney CAZELLE
LSSIP Year 2017 France 135 Released Issue ANNEX C – Implementation Objectives’ Applicability
SESAR ICAO ASBU Objective European ATM Masterplan Level 3 Applicability area Key Feature B0 All ECAC States except Albania, Latvia, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and AOM13.1 ‐ Moldova. All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Malta, Luxembourg, and AOM19.1 B0‐FRTO Moldova AOM19.2 ‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova
AOM19.3 ‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova
AOM21.1 B0‐FRTO 25 ECAC States
All ECAC States except Azerbaijan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the AOM21.2 ‐ Netherlands
AOP04.1 B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports
AOP04.2 B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports
AOP05 B0‐ACDM 25 PCP airports, 21 non‐PCP airports
AOP10 ‐ 16 PCP Airports
AOP11 ‐ 24 PCP airports, 15 non‐PCP airports
AOP12 ‐ 25 PCP airports
AOP13 ‐ 25 PCP airports
AOP14 ‐ Local: Low to medium complexity aerodromes, subject to local needs
Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all ECAC States that did ATC02.2 B0‐SNET not yet implement it ATC02.8 B0‐SNET All ECAC States except the Netherlands
ATC02.9 B0‐SNET TMAs, according to local business needs
ATC07.1 B0‐RSEQ 23 PCP Airports, 8 non‐PCP airports
ATC12.1 ‐ All ECAC States except Luxembourg
EU States except Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovak ATC15.1 B0‐RSEQ Republic, Slovenia. Plus: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maastricht UAC, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey ACCs within the extended AMAN horizon, including those adjacent to ATC15.2 ‐ TMAs serving/associated to PCP airports Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that ATC16 B0‐ACAS did not yet implement it ATC17 B0‐FICE All ECAC States except Ireland, Slovak Republic and Ukraine
ATC18 ‐ Local: Subject to local needs and complexity
COM10 ‐ All ECAC States
COM11 ‐ All ECAC States
LSSIP Year 2017 France 136 Released Issue ‐ Area 1 (ANSPs signatories of the NewPENS Common Procurement Agreement): 33 ANSPs COM12 ‐ ‐ Area 2 (Other stakeholders): Stakeholders from all ECAC States not part of Area 1 ENV01 B0‐CDO 59 Airports
ENV02 ‐ 47 Airports
ENV03 B0‐CCO Local: Aerodromes subject to local needs and complexity
Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that FCM01 B0‐NOPS did not yet implement it FCM03 B0‐NOPS All ECAC States
Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, FCM04.1 B0‐NOPS Spain, Switzerland FCM04.2 B0‐NOPS All EU+ States
All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC FCM05 B0‐NOPS and Moldova FCM06 B0‐NOPS All EU+ States
FCM07 ‐ All EU+ States
FCM08 ‐ All ECAC States
FCM09 ‐ All ECAC States
Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that INF04 B0‐DATM did not yet implement it INF07 ‐ All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC
INF08.1 ‐ All EU+ States
INF08.2 ‐ All EU+ States
ITY‐ACID ‐ All EU+ States
ITY‐ADQ B0‐DATM All EU+ States except FYROM, Georgia and Maastricht UAC
ITY‐AGDL B0‐TBO All EU+ States except Georgia, Luxembourg and Netherlands
ITY‐AGVCS2 ‐ All EU+ States except Georgia and Moldova
Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all EU+ States that did ITY‐COTR B0‐FICE not yet implement it ITY‐FMTP B0‐FICE All ECAC States
ITY‐SPI B0‐ASUR All EU+ States
B0‐CDO, NAV03.1 All ECAC States except Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Slovak Republic B0‐CCO Mandatory for TMAs listed in section 1.2.1 of the Annex of the PCP NAV03.2 ‐ Regulation. For all other ECAC TMAs, according to local business needs NAV10 B0‐APTA All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC
NAV12 ‐ Local: TMAs subject to local needs and complexity
SAF11 ‐ All ECAC States except Malta
LSSIP Year 2017 France 137 Released Issue
Legend:
Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:
Optimised ATM Network Services High Performing Airport Operations
Advanced Air Traffic Services Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
LSSIP Year 2017 France 138 Released Issue ANNEX D ‐ Glossary of Abbreviations
This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP France. Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in http://www.EUROCONTROL.int/articles/glossaries
Term Description
ADP Aéroports de Paris AF ATM Functionality AEFMP Algeria‐Spain‐France‐Morocco‐Portugal (Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegación Aérea) Former name of ENAIRE as AENA from 05/07/2014 ALAVIA Etat‐major de l’Aviation Navale AMHS ATS Message Handling System ANA Personnel Office BEA Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses pour la sécurité de l'aviation civile Coordonnateur AUtomatique du TRafic Aérien (automatic air traffic CAUTRA coordination system) CEV Centre d’Essai en Vol Commandement des Forces Aériennes / Brigade Aérienne de Contrôle de CFA / BACE l'Espace CNA Certification of ANSP Office COHOR Association pour la COordination des HORaires COMALAT Commandement de l'Aviation Légère de l'Armée de Terre CRNA Centre en Route de la Navigation Aérienne CSSIP Communications Sol‐Sol Internet protocole DGAC Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile DIA Division Information Aéronautique DIRCAM Direction de la Circulation Aérienne Militaire Direction Interarmées des Réseaux d'Infrastructure et des Systèmes DIRISI d'Information DSAC Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile DSAÉ Direction de la Sécurité Aéronautique d'État DSNA Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne DTA Direction du Transport Aérien ENAIRE (Ex AENA) Spanish ANSP ERATO En Route Air Traffic Organizer FAP Future ATM Profile FT Fast Track CDG Aéroport de Paris Roissy ‐ Charles De Gaulle Moyen d'Aide à l'Ecoulement Séquencé du Trafic avec Recherche MAESTRO d'Optimisation MCU Mission Ciel unique
LSSIP Year 2017 France 139 Released Issue MoD Ministry of Defence MoT Ministry of Transport MOR Mandatory Occurrence Reporting PCP Pilot Common Project DP Deployment Programme NAS National Airspace System S‐AF Sub ATM Functionality SDEA Airspace sub‐directorate SDSA Surveillance and Audit sub‐directorate SDR Regulatory sub‐directorate SETINET Skyguide ENAV International Network SOCRATE (Inter‐army voice and data network) UAF Union des Aéroports Français
LSSIP Year 2017 France 140 Released Issue