FRANCE Local Single Sky Implementation Level 1 - Implementation Overview
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
of ATM Implementation Reporting EUROCONTROL 25YEARS in Europe LSSIP 2018 - FRANCE Local Single Sky ImPlementation Level 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2018 for France Infocentre Reference 19/02/05/16 Date of Edition 23/04/19 LSSIP Focal Point Jean-Jacques Blanchard – jean-jacques.blanchard@aviation- civile.gouv.fr LSSIP Contact Person Jorge Pinto – [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip Reference Documents LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip LSSIP Guidance http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip Material Master Plan Level 3 – http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3- Plan Edition 2018 implementation-plan Master Plan Level 3 – http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3- Report Year 2018 implementation-report European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor Acronyms and https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official- abbreviations documents/guidance/Glossaries.pdf National AIP https://www.sia.aviation-civile.gouv.fr/ LSSIP Year 2018 France Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2018 document and their signature confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2018. LSSIP Year 2018 France Released Issue CONTENTS 1. National ATM Environment ............................................................ 8 Geographical Scope ............................................................................................ 8 National Stakeholders ...................................................................................... 11 2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 23 Evolution of traffic in France ............................................................................ 23 ACC Bordeaux ................................................................................................... 24 ACC Brest .......................................................................................................... 28 ACC Marseille ................................................................................................... 32 ACC Paris........................................................................................................... 39 ACC Reims ......................................................................................................... 44 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 48 4. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 50 National projects .............................................................................................. 50 FAB projects ..................................................................................................... 61 Regional projects .............................................................................................. 64 5. Cooperation activities .................................................................. 66 FAB Co-ordination ............................................................................................ 66 Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 66 6. Implementation Objectives Progress ........................................... 71 State View......................................................................................................... 71 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 78 Annexes Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for France National stakeholders’ organisation charts Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR, ICAO and DP Glossary of abbreviations Mature SESAR Solutions not associated to an Implementation Objective LSSIP Year 2018 France Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Leading stakeholders involved in ATM in France are the Ministry for the Armed Forces and the Ministry for the Ecological and Inclusive Transition, respectively through French Military Air Traffic Management Directorate (DIRCAM - Direction de la Circulation Aérienne Militaire) and French Civil Aviation Authority (DGAC - Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile). Air Transport Directorate (DTA - Direction du Transport Aérien) and Civil Aviation Safety Directorate (DSAC - Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile), both belonging to DGAC but functionally separated, are defined as national supervisory authorities (NSA) : DTA for charging and performance and DSAC for safety oversight in air navigation services and air traffic management, including in particular changes oversight and interoperability. For services provided to general air traffic, DIRCAM exercises the national supervisory functions within Defence on behalf of DSAC, according to national decrees. Main civil ATM ANSP includes DSNA (Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne), the French air navigation services provider certified and designated for ATM services (as well as for CNS and AIS) and 66 stakeholders, providing Aerodrome Flight Information Service (AFIS) for GAT on 67aerodromes. In addition seven military ANSPs providing services to general air traffic and covering ATC, CNS and AIS services, are certified in France. Among them four are designated since December 2011 as military air traffic service provider for the benefit of general air traffic. Météo-France is certified and formally designated as the only one national MET provider since 20th December 2011. Moreover, major airports (Paris Roissy-CDG, Paris Orly, Nice Côte d’Azur, Lyon Saint Exupéry, Toulouse Blagnac, and Marseille Provence) operators contribute to reporting. France is member state of the FABEC together with Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, The Netherlands and Switzerland. In the course of 2011, two performance plans have been established for the first reference period (2012-2014) and submitted to the European Commission in compliance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 of 29th July 2010 and agreed according to Commission Recommendation 2012/C 228/01 of 29th July 2012. Those first national and FABEC RP1 performance plans addressed safety, capacity, flight efficiency and military mission effectiveness through complementary Key Performance indicators (KPI, with targets) and Performance Indicators (PI, for monitoring purposes without targets). In addition, the national plan addressed cost efficiency performance indicators. For the 2nd reference period the FABEC Performance Plan for 2015 – 2019 has been delivered to the Commission 30th June 2014 in compliance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 and 391/2013 of 3rd May 2013 ; a first revised version has been submitted 2nd July 2015 and a final one 30th January 2017 is still under assessment. It sets safety, en route and terminal capacity, flight efficiency and cost efficiency targets. There is no more national French performance plan as such, as for RP1 but national chapters of the FABEC performance plan address targets set at national level. More over the DSAC is involved in the agreement on the cooperation of the FABEC national supervisory authorities and a manual for their common activities of has been issued in 2012. LSSIP Year 2018 France 1 Released Issue Traffic and Capacity Traffic in France increased by 2,1 % during summer 2018 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2017. Regarding the 2018-2023 period the STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual increase between 0.5% and 3.1% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.9%. Regarding the current capacity plan of 5 French ACC between 2019 and 2024: - Bordeaux ACC: a capacity gap up to 20% is expected throughout the entire planning period. - Brest ACC: a capacity gap of approximately 15% is expected throughout the entire planning period. - Marseille ACC: a capacity gap between 20 and 25% is expected throughout the entire planning period. - Paris ACC: a minor capacity gap might be experienced in Paris ACC for some years of the planning period. - Reims ACC: a capacity gap up to 18% is expected in Reims for most of the planning period. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ATM MP L3 Edition 2011-2017) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. Pre-SESAR 2010 2019 Implementation 85% PCP 2015 2023 Implementation 42% LSSIP Year 2018 France 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as