DOCSLIB.ORG

Chicago to St. Louis 220 Mph High Speed Rail Alternative Corridor Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Chicago to St. Louis 220 mph High Speed Rail Alternative Corridor Study Volume 1 – Infrastructure & Cost Revised October 8, 2009 Prepared by: Prepared for: 222 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 2320 Chicago, IL 60606 P: 312-669-9601 F: 312-669-9606 www.transystems.com In association with: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Initiation and Need ......................................................................................... 3 1.2 Key Findings .............................................................................................................. 4 2.0 Design Criteria ............................................................................................................... 7 3.0 Task 1: Evaluation of Corridors ...................................................................................10 3.1 Background ...............................................................................................................10 3.2 Approach ..................................................................................................................10 3.3 Alternatives Review ...................................................................................................13 3.4 Western Routing .......................................................................................................13 3.5 Eastern Routing ........................................................................................................13 3.6 Regulatory Environment ............................................................................................15 3.6.1 Signals ......................................................................................................................15 3.6.2 Track .........................................................................................................................15 3.6.3 FRA Vehicle Compliance ..........................................................................................16 3.6.4 Implications for the Chicago-St. Louis route ..............................................................16 4.0 Task 2: Analysis and Recommendations ...................................................................17 4.1 Geographically Segmented Approach .......................................................................17 4.2 Descriptions of Rural Area Concepts.........................................................................17 4.2.1 Using the Existing Railroad Corridor .........................................................................17 4.2.2 Using the Interstate Highways Corridors ...................................................................18 4.2.3 Developing New Corridors ........................................................................................19 4.3 Descriptions of Urban Area Concepts .......................................................................19 4.3.1 Chicago .....................................................................................................................19 4.3.2 Kankakee ..................................................................................................................21 4.3.3 Champaign................................................................................................................21 4.3.4 Decatur .....................................................................................................................22 4.3.5 Springfield .................................................................................................................22 4.3.6 St. Louis/Metro East ..................................................................................................22 5.0 Task 3: Proposed Running Times – Simulation Model ..............................................24 5.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................24 5.2 Key Finding ...............................................................................................................24 5.3 Model Components ...................................................................................................24 CHICAGO TO ST. LOUIS HIGH SPEED RAIL ALTERNATIVE CORRIDOR STUDY - 1 - 5.4 Key Model Assumptions ............................................................................................26 6.0 Conceptual Level Cost Estimate .................................................................................27 6.1 Assumptions .............................................................................................................27 6.2 Primary Cost Elements..............................................................................................27 6.2.1 End to End Costs ......................................................................................................27 6.2.2 Rural Farmland – Template Costs .............................................................................27 6.2.3 Small Villages – Template Costs ...............................................................................27 6.2.4 Urban – Elements Counted .......................................................................................27 CHICAGO TO ST. LOUIS HIGH SPEED RAIL ALTERNATIVE CORRIDOR STUDY - 2 - 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Project Initiation and Need In March 2009 TranSystems was retained by The Midwest High Speed Rail Association (MHSRA) to conduct a limited alternative corridor feasibility study for a high speed passenger rail route from Chicago to St. Louis via Kankakee, Champaign, Decatur, and Springfield. In August 2009 MHSRA authorized enhancing the project corridor study area by extending it to Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport This volume consists of the following elements: 1. A comparison of reasonable alternative alignments to the existing Union Pacific corridor between Chicago and St. Louis via Joliet and Springfield and a “fatal flaw” analysis of the proposed corridor via Champaign and Decatur. 2. An evaluation of the proposed alignment via Champaign and Decatur examining the suitability of the existing railroad rights-of-way to support a 220 mph maximum speed high speed rail operation using an approximately two hour schedule between Chicago and St. Louis. 3. Development of expected train running times using a railroad operations simulator for the proposed corridor with expected running times for each of the intermediate segments. 4. Development of a conceptual level cost estimate for infrastructure improvements between O’Hare and St. Louis to allow for approximately two hour service between downtown Chicago and St. Louis. 5. A phasing plan showing the running time and capital costs for each logical segment. Additional tasks also authorized In August include: 6. A sketch planning exercise to develop a ridership estimate sufficient to complete an initial calculation of project benefits and train fleet requirements needed to meet the estimated demand. 7. An economic benefits analysis that shows the economic impact of the proposed project. 8. An environmental benefits analysis that describes the general impacts of the proposed project on the environment along the corridor. These reports are contained in Volume 2. CHICAGO TO ST. LOUIS HIGH SPEED RAIL ALTERNATIVE CORRIDOR STUDY - 3 - 1.2 Key Findings This study generated the following key findings: 1. No other suitable railroad corridor exists between Chicago and St. Louis other than the existing corridor via Joliet and Springfield and the proposed corridor via Champaign and Decatur. The proposed corridor does not contain any “fatal flaws” that would eliminate its use as a high speed rail passenger line based on bifurcating the existing railroad rights-of-way. Any railroad property acquisition would of course be subject to negotiation and, if successful, expected payment of compensation to the owning carrier. 2. The proposed corridor via Champaign and Decatur has the alignment and grade to support 220 mph operating speed, with the addition of complete grade separation and fencing of the right-of-way. Between Springfield and St. Louis a route using a combination of existing rail lines which do not currently have passenger service could be used instead of the existing Amtrak route (via the Union Pacific Railroad). The existing Amtrak route is constrained by numerous horizontal curves which limit maximum speeds to approximately 70-90 mph. Additionally, the alternate corridor would provide for a shorter travel distance and a new and more centrally located station stop on the Illinois side of the Mississippi River. 3. Simulation runs show that express trains using the proposed corridor, stopping only at Champaign and Springfield, could operate between downtown Chicago and downtown St. Louis in 1 hour 52 minutes while operating at least once an hour in each direction. Trains stopping at McCormick Place, Kankakee, Champaign, Decatur, Springfield, and Metro East could complete the run in 2 hours 4 minutes. 4. The infrastructure for the high speed rail passenger line between Chicago O’Hare and St. Louis could be built for a cost of $12.6 Billion in 2012 dollars. This estimate includes the track, bridges, signals, electrification, grade separations, fencing and other civil work, as well design and construction management fees, and a contingency allowance. It does not include rolling stock, maintenance facilities, stations, or other program costs. 5. Table
Recommended publications
  • CP in Minnesota

    CP in Minnesota

    CP+KCS: THE BETTER OPTION FOR CHICAGO A CP+KCS COMBINATION PROVIDES BOTH THE FLEXIBILITY TO BYPASS CHICAGO AND THE ABILITY TO IMPROVE OPERATIONS IN THE CITY, WHICH WILL BE OF ENORMOUS BENEFIT TO CP AND KCS CUSTOMERS. With CP’s network through Iowa and KCS’ connection in Kansas City, our customers would benefit from improved flows between Canada and the U.S. Upper Midwest with Mexico, Texas and Louisiana. We would also create additional capacity for growth in Chicago while unlocking positive environmental benefits through reduced emissions in the city. By contrast, Canadian National Railway’s proposed KCS combination would fail to create these benefits and instead result in increased traffic and congestion for Chicago. FUTUREFORFREIGHT.COM IMPROVED SERVICE & CP’s Chicago Facilities CONNECTIVITY Strategically located northwest of By running south to Chicago and Kansas City – through the Twin downtown Chicago, CP's intermodal Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota, and through facilities at Bensenville and Schiller Park Milwaukee – CP offers a direct, single-carrier route between near O’Hare Airport provide direct western Canada and the U.S. Midwest, providing access to Great access to Chicago, northern Illinois, Lakes and Mississippi River ports. southern Wisconsin and eastern Iowa. From La Crosse, Wisconsin, the Central Corridor continues south toward Kansas City via the Quad Cities (Davenport and Three major highways surrounding the Bettendorf in Iowa, and Rock Island and Moline in Illinois), intermodal yards help move cargo to its providing an efficient route for traffic destined for southern U.S. destination faster, while keeping it out and Mexican markets via KCS' network from Kansas City of downtown Chicago.
  • Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States

    Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States

    Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 First Printing 2013 Copyright © 2013, Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, mechanical (including photocopying), recording, taping, or information or retrieval systems—without permission of the pub- lisher. Published by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, New York 10119 Graphics Database: V212 CONTENTS FOREWORD XV PREFACE XVII PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH 3 1.1 Unprecedented Support for High Speed Rail in the U.S. ....................3 1.2 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the U.S. .....4 1.3 Research Objectives . 6 1.4 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Participants ...........................6 1.5 Host Manufacturers and Operators......................................7 1.6 A Snapshot in Time .................................................10 CHAPTER 2 HOST MANUFACTURERS AND OPERATORS, THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 11 2.1 Overview . 11 2.2 Introduction to Host HSR Manufacturers . 11 2.3 Introduction to Host HSR Operators and Regulatory Agencies .
  • Interaction of Lifecycle Properties in High Speed Rail Systems Operation

    Interaction of Lifecycle Properties in High Speed Rail Systems Operation

    Interaction of Lifecycle Properties in High Speed Rail Systems Operation by Tatsuya Doi M.E., Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Tokyo, 2011 B.E., Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Tokyo, 2009 Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2016 © 2016 Tatsuya Doi. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: ____________________________________________________________________ Institute for Data, Systems, and Society May 6, 2016 Certified by: __________________________________________________________________________ Joseph M. Sussman JR East Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Certified by: __________________________________________________________________________ Olivier L. de Weck Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: _________________________________________________________________________ John N. Tsitsiklis Clarence J. Lebel Professor of Electrical Engineering IDSS Graduate Officer 1 2 Interaction of Lifecycle Properties In High Speed Rail Systems Operation by Tatsuya Doi Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society on May 6, 2016 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering Systems ABSTRACT High-Speed Rail (HSR) has been expanding throughout the world, providing various nations with alternative solutions for the infrastructure design of intercity passenger travel. HSR is a capital-intensive infrastructure, in which multiple subsystems are closely integrated. Also, HSR operation lasts for a long period, and its performance indicators are continuously altered by incremental updates.
  • Transit Drives Business Decisions

    Transit Drives Business Decisions

    Metroplanning.org/transitmeansbusiness Introduction: Transit Drives Business Decisions McDonald's. Caterpillar. Motorola Solutions. These Chicago region-based companies have many things in common: Table of Contents They employ thousands, help drive our region’s economy, Introduction: Transit Drives Business and cite transit as a key factor in their location and Decisions 3 recruitment strategy. Transit Has a Net Economic Benefit 5 Talent Prefers Transit 7 Businesses throughout the region rely on and benefit from metropolitan Chicago’s transit system. Transit Delivers Talent 10 However, the critical connection between transit investments and our ability to recruit and retain business in metropolitan Chicago is not broadly understood. With Transit Means Business, the Job Creation is Accelerated Near Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC) is bringing together business leaders, transit leadership and state Transit 12 and local government to advocate for stronger investments in our region’s transit system. Transit Fosters Economic Resiliency 14 The reasons to mobilize now are clear. Businesses are betting on transit, but without sufficient Transit Delivers Value to Business 15 investment the competitive advantage our system provides is eroding and will start to fail. Our metropolitan-wide research shows: Case Studies 17 - Businesses are choosing to locate near transit to access larger labor pools; End Notes & Acknowledgements 47 - Locations near transit offer businesses increased resiliency; - Transit-accessible locations outperform the regional average on job growth, especially near rail. This report dives into the data to reveal how transit supports businesses, and profiles companies who are making transit-based decisions that benefit their bottom line. A growing and thriving transit system means a growing and thriving economy.
  • SPEEDLINES, HSIPR Committee, Issue

    SPEEDLINES, HSIPR Committee, Issue

    High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail SPEEDLINES JULY 2017 ISSUE #21 2 CONTENTS SPEEDLINES MAGAZINE 3 HSIPR COMMITTEE CHAIR LETTER 5 APTA’S HS&IPR ROI STUDY Planes, trains, and automobiles may have carried us through the 7 VIRGINIA VIEW 20th century, but these days, the future buzz is magnetic levitation, autonomous vehicles, skytran, jet- 10 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES packs, and zip lines that fit in a backpack. 15 MAGLEV » p.15 18 HYPERLOOP On the front cover: Futuristic visions of transport systems are unlikely to 20 SPOTLIGHT solve our current challenges, it’s always good to dream. Technology promises cleaner transportation systems for busy metropolitan cities where residents don’t have 21 CASCADE CORRIDOR much time to spend in traffic jams. 23 USDOT FUNDING TO CALTRAINS CHAIR: ANNA BARRY VICE CHAIR: AL ENGEL SECRETARY: JENNIFER BERGENER OFFICER AT LARGE: DAVID CAMERON 25 APTA’S 2017 HSIPR CONFERENCE IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIR: PETER GERTLER EDITOR: WENDY WENNER PUBLISHER: AL ENGEL 29 LEGISLATIVE OUTLOOK ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER: KENNETH SISLAK ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER: ERIC PETERSON LAYOUT DESIGNER: WENDY WENNER 31 NY PENN STATION RENEWAL © 2011-2017 APTA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SPEEDLINES is published in cooperation with: 32 GATEWAY PROGRAM AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION 1300 I Street NW, Suite 1200 East Washington, DC 20005 35 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS “The purpose of SPEEDLINES is to keep our members and friends apprised of the high performance passenger rail envi- ronment by covering project and technology developments domestically and globally, along with policy/financing break- throughs. Opinions expressed represent the views of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of APTA nor its High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Committee.” 4 Dear HS&IPR Committee & Friends : I am pleased to continue to the newest issue of our Committee publication, the acclaimed SPEEDLINES.
  • (HSIPR) Program

    (HSIPR) Program

    Track 1a – FD/Construction and/or Track 4 OMB No. 2130-0583 Project Name: Date of Submission: Version Number: High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program Application Form Track 1a–Final Design (FD)/Construction & Track 4–FY 2009 Appropriations Projects Welcome to the Track 1a Final Design (FD)/Construction and Track 4 Application for the Federal Railroad Administration’s High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program. Applicants for Track 1a FD/Construction and/or Track 4 are required to submit this Application Form and Supporting Materials (forms and documents) as outlined in Section G of this application and in the HSIPR Guidance. We appreciate your interest in the program and look forward to reviewing your application. If you have questions about the HSIPR program or this application, please contact us at [email protected]. Instructions: Please complete the HSIPR Application electronically. See Section G for a complete list of the required application materials. In the space provided at the top of each section, please indicate the project name, date of submission (mm/dd/yy) and the application version number. The distinct Track 1a and/or Track 4 project name should be less than 40 characters and follow the following format: State abbreviation-route or corridor name-project title (e.g., HI-Fast Corridor-Track Work IV). For each question, enter the appropriate information in the designated gray box. If a question is not applicable to your FD/Construction Project, please indicate “N/A.” Narrative questions should be answered concisely within the limitations indicated. Applicants must upload this completed application and all other application materials to www.GrantSolutions.gov by August 24, 2009 at 11:59pm EDT.
  • Multiple Use of Space and Railway Infrastructure

    Multiple Use of Space and Railway Infrastructure

    RAIL ESTATE MULTIPLE USE OF SPACE AND RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE Sebastiaan de Wilde Rail Estate Multiple Use of Space and Railway Infrastructure Sebastiaan de Wilde Rail Estate Multiple Use of Space and Railway Infrastructure Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof.dr.ir. J.T. Fokkema, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 12 december 2006 om 15.00 uur door Theodoor Sebastiaan DE WILDE civiel ingenieur en doctorandus in de bedrijfskunde geboren te Amsterdam Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotoren: Prof.dipl.-ing. J.N.J.A. Vambersky Prof.dr. E.F. Nozeman Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Rector Magnificus, voorzitter Prof.dipl.-ing. J.N.J.A. Vambersky, Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor Prof.dr. E.F. Nozeman, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, promotor Prof.dr. D.B. Needham, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen Prof.ir. A.C.W.M. Vrouwenvelder, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof.ir. H. de Jonge, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof.ir. H.H. Snijder, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven ir. L.I. Vákár, Movares, Utrecht Publisher: Movares Nederland B.V. Postbus 2855, 3500 GW Utrecht [email protected] / www.movares.nl ISBN 10: 90-77221-06-9 ISBN 13: 978-90-77221-06-9 Text editing: S.W. Rawcliffe Graphic design: S.P.M. Reinaerdts, Movares Nederland B.V. Print: Drukkerij Mercurius, Wormerveer © 2006, Th.S. de Wilde All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used and/or reproduced in any manner without written permission from the author, except in the context of reviews.
  • JRTR No.64 Topics

    JRTR No.64 Topics

    Topics January–July 2014 January 23— Kawasaki Heavy Industries announced delivery of three trainsets (33 carriages) including first sets of new subway cars (R188) to New York City Transport from Kawasaki’s 1— Single-engine light aircraft made emergency landing on local US affiliate (KRC); delivery included 23 new and 10 highway in Bronx, New York, USA, injuring pilot and three refurbished cars as part of 2011 contract option for 103 passengers new and 370 refurbished cars to be delivered in stages 5— Small two-engine jet aircraft crashed and burned on by late 2015 landing at Aspen Airport in Colorado, USA, killing one 24— Industry group composed of Itochu Trading, Kinki Rolling person and injuring two others Stock and Kawasaki Heavy Industries announced order 5— Saudi Arabian Airways 767 landed safely on one set of worth ¥14.8 billion from Hong Kong MTR for refurbishment undercarriage wheels at Medina Airport, Saudi Arabia, of 348 existing cars and supply of 36 new passenger cars injuring 29 people onboard to extend new routes using existing and new tracks to new specifications 6— Japanese National Police Agency announced 13th consecutive annual drop in 2013 road deaths to 4373 24— MLIT announced supervisory order based on Act on (down 38 year-on-year) but increase in road deaths to Passenger Railway Companies and Japan Freight 2303 of people aged 65 and over (up 39 year-on-year) Railway Company as well as business improvement order for the first time in 12 years following Railway Business Act targeting JR Hokkaido following exposure
  • 12.09 High Speed Rail to Heathrow

    12.09 High Speed Rail to Heathrow

    IARO report 12.09 High Speed Rail at Heathrow: an international perspective © IARO 2009 1 May 2009 IARO Report 12.09: High Speed Rail at Heathrow: an international perspective Editor: Andrew Sharp Published by International Air Rail Organisation 6th Floor, 50 Eastbourne Terrace London W2 6LX Great Britain Published with grateful thanks to those members who contributed to this report. Telephone +44 (0)20 8750 6632 Fax +44 (0)20 8750 6615 website www.iaro.com, www.airportrailwaysoftheworld.com email [email protected] ISBN 1 903108 10 1 © International Air Rail Organisation 2009 £250 to non-members Our mission is to spread world class best practice and good practical ideas among airport rail links world-wide. © IARO 2009 2 May 2009 Contents Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 List of abbreviations and acronyms --------------------------------------------- 5 1 The options ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 2 National and international parallels --------------------------------------- 12 3 The importance of non-airport traffic-------------------------------------- 30 4 Railway technology, local geography and traffic ------------------------ 32 5 Could the Heathrow Express tunnels be used?-------------------------- 40 6 Cargo --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 43 7 Other resources --------------------------------------------------------------- 44 8 Conclusions--------------------------------------------------------------------
  • The World of Metro Rail in Pictures

    The World of Metro Rail in Pictures

    THE WORLD OF METRO RAIL IN PICTURES "Dragon Boat Architecture" at Jiantan Metro Station, Taipei, Taiwan By Dr. F.A. Wingler, Germany, July 2020 Dr. Frank August Wingler Doenhoffstrasse 92 D 51373 Leverkusen [email protected] http://www.drwingler.com - b - 21st Century Global Metro Rail in Pictures This is Part II of a Gallery with Pictures of 21st Century Global Metro Rail, with exception of Indian Metro Rail (Part I), elaborated for a book project of the authors M.M. Agarwal, S. Chandra and K.K. Miglani on METRO RAIL IN INDIA . Metros across the World have been in operation since the late 1800s and transport millions of commuters across cities every day. There are now more than 190 Metro Installations globally with an average of about 190 million daily passengers. The first Metro Rail, that went underground, had been in London, England, and opened as an underground steam train for the public on 10st January 1863: llustration of a Train at Praed Street Junction near Paddington, 1863; from: History Today, Volume 63, Issue 1, January, 2013 Vintage London Underground Steam Train; Source “Made up in Britain” 1 Thed worl over, the 21st Century observed the opening of many new Metro Lines, the extension o f existing Metro Systems and the acquisition of modern Rolling Stocks, mostly in Asian Countries. In the last decades Urban Rail Transits in China developed fastest in the world. Urban Rail Transit in the People's Republic of China encompasses a broad range of urban and suburban electric passenger rail mass transit systems including subway, light rail, tram and maglev.
  • Towards a Single and Innovative European Transport System

    Towards a Single and Innovative European Transport System

    7RZDUGVD6LQJOHDQG,QQRYDWLYH (XURSHDQ 7UDQVSRUW6\VWHP ,QWHUQDWLRQDO$VVHVVPHQWDQG$FWLRQ3ODQV RIWKH)RFXV$UHDV )LQDO5HSRUW -XO\ mmmll European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport Directorate B – Investment, Innovation & Sustainable Transport Unit B3 – Innovation and Research Contact e-mail: [email protected] Authors: Angelos Bekiaris, Centre of Research and Technology Hellas, CERTH Oliver Lah, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy Matina Loukea, Centre of Research and Technology Hellas, CERTH Gereon Meyer, VDI/VDE Innovation + Technik GmbH Beate Müller, VDI/VDE Innovation + Technik GmbH Shritu Shrestha, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy Sebastian Stagl, VDI/VDE Innovation + Technik GmbH Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 ISBN 978-92-79-71640-9 DOI: 10.2832/006045 Catalogue: MI-01-17-866-EN-N © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. ii Towards a Single and Innovative European Transport System International Assessment and Action Plans of the Focus Areas Final Report July 2017 iii Final Report – International Assessment and Action Plans of the Focus Areas Abstract The study “Towards a Single and Innovative European Transport System” is developing action plans for the establishment of an integrated transport system in Europe.

  • Illinois Missouri Train Schedule November 2011

    Amtrak service in ILLINOIS NOVEMBER 7, 2011 and Effective MISSOURI SM Enjoy the journey. CHICAGO - SPRINGFIELD - ST. LOUIS JEFFERSON CITY - KANSAS CITY And intermediate stations 1-800-USA-RAIL CHICAGO - GALESBURG - QUINCY Call And intermediate stations CHICAGO - CHAMPAIGN/URBANA CENTRALIA - CARBONDALE And intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form W21–125M–11/7/11 Stock #02-3214 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI ROUTES-Southbound #HICAGOs3PRINGFIELDs3T,OUISs*EFFERSON#ITYs+ANSAS#ITY Missouri Missouri Service on Illinois and Lincoln Lincoln Texas Lincoln Lincoln Train Name River River Service Service Eagle Service Service Missouri Route Trains Runner Runner R Coaches: Reservations 4RAIN.UMBER 311 301 303 313 21^¢ 305 307 required. B Business class service. Normal Days of Operation Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily s Sleeping cars: R B R B R B R B R s R B R B - Amtrak Metropolitan On Board Service Lounge available in Chicago y y y y r l y y for Sleeping car service Mile 3YMBOL passengers. r Chicago, IL b Rockford, (CT) 0 ∑w- Dp 7 00A 9 25A l1 45P 5 15P 7 00P Dining –Cross Country Madison—see back Café: Casual service offering Summit, IL 12 > 9 48A 5 37P 7 22P complete meals on Trains 21 Joliet, IL 37 ∑v 7 57A 10 15A R2 40P 6 05P 7 50P and 22. y Dwight, IL 74 > 10 49A 6 39P 8 24P Café: Sandwiches, snacks and 92 >v 11 06A 3 27P 6 56P 8 41P beverages.