Richard Steigmann-Gall. The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of , 1919-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 294 pp. $30,00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-521-82371-5.

Reviewed by John S. Conway

Published on H-German (June, 2003)

Richard Steigmann-Gall's lively and some‐ cause as theologically justifed as well as political‐ times provocative study of the relationship be‐ ly appropriate. tween and Christianity breaks new Nazism idealized, even idolized, the German ground. He takes issue with those, like this re‐ nation and Volk. Steigmann-Gall shows how this viewer, who argue that Nazism and Christianity tendency was already present in the newly-creat‐ were incompatible, both in theory and practice. ed Bismarckian Reich, and was greatly fostered by Instead he examines more closely the areas of the Protestant clergy. Their wartime in overlap and the consequent ambiguities in the 1914 asserted divine approval of Germany's cause minds of many leading Nazis. He rejects the view and called down damnation upon her enemies. that, when Nazi orators before 1933 made fre‐ After her defeat in 1918, the clergy provided the quent use of a Christian vocabulary, it was purely spiritual climate for an apocalyptic view of Ger‐ a tactical device to gain votes. Later on, such de‐ many's destiny, valiantly guarding itself against ceptive religiosity would be discarded as no the onslaughts of the evils of Marxism, , longer needed. Instead he shows the extensive Bolshevism and materialism. Such dualistic think‐ and consistent appreciation of Christianity as a re‐ ing both ran parallel to and nurtured the extrem‐ ligious system in the Nazi ranks, even among sev‐ ism of the radical political groups of the 1920s, out eral members of its hierarchy. Similarly he dis‐ of which Nazism emerged as the most successful. putes the claim that those who focked Nazism's most notorious characteristic was its to the Nazi cause were shallow-minded oppor‐ . Many observers have claimed that tunists, jumping on a popular political bandwag‐ the Holocaust was the culmination of centuries of on. Instead, he argues that the stressful conditions Christian intolerance and persecution. Church‐ of a defeated Germany led many sincere Chris‐ men, for their part, have sought to draw a line be‐ tians, particularly Protestants, to regard the Nazi tween earlier Christian theological anti-Judaism and the far more virulent Nazi racial anti‐ H-Net Reviews semitism. But Steigmann-Gall, following Uriel Tal, was only adopting the ideas of at least one ex‐ shows how easily both Catholic and Protestant treme wing of "German Christian" . could merge their religious antipathies Certainly, these "paganists," as Steigmann-Gall with the Nazis' political campaign. On the other calls them, exercised little control over Nazi poli‐ side, he shows how many Nazis believed in the re‐ cy. Hitler stoutly and consistently rejected any talk ligious basis of their hatred of , who formed a of an ersatz religion based on German myths or negative point of reference for an ideology of na‐ culminating in Valhalla. The "positive Christiani‐ tional-religious integration. Luther's stance ty" of such leaders as Goering continued to stress against the Jews could thus be supported, for the advantages of a national non-denominational more than merely tactical reasons. And Hitler's Christianity in such areas as education or social support of "" was an attempt welfare. And even strident anti-clericals such as to overcome confessional diferences in order to Goebbels or Streicher supported the idea of an concentrate Christian forces against their arch-en‐ Christianity as an admirable moral system. emy, the Jew. To be sure many leading Nazis were The fact that the churches were the only major in‐ anti-clerical. But this venom was principally di‐ stitutions which did not sufer rected against those priests and pastors who put shows, in Steigmann-Gall's view, "the fundamen‐ their institutional loyalties ahead of their national tally positive attitude of the Nazi state toward at ones. This did not prevent these Nazis from be‐ least the Protestant Church as a whole." For this lieving that their movement was in some sense reason, in 1934 Hitler refused to back the radicals Christian. It was on this basis that such Nazis as and in 1935 appointed an old crony and primitive Wilhelm Kube, the Bavarian Minister of Protestant, , to be Minister of Church Education, Hans Schemm, and Hanns Kerrl, the Afairs. The kind of Christianity Kerrl afrmed Prussian Minister of Justice who later became Re‐ was proclaimed in his speeches: " has ich Minister of Ecclesiastical Afairs, could seek an hammered the faith and fact of into the alliance with those elements in the churches, es‐ hearts of the German Volk.... True Christianity and pecially Protestants, who supported the Nazis' au‐ National Socialism are identical." But Kerrl, who thoritarian, anti-Marxist and antisemitic policies. was appointed to co-ordinate the rival Protestant This was not, Steigmann-Gall believes, a mere op‐ factions, failed. Thereupon, Steigmann-Gall notes, portunistic relationship on either side. Both be‐ Hitler turned against the churches and aban‐ lieved they were adopting a genuinely Christian doned institutional Protestantism once and for all. stance, "following a call to faith from God, which But even so, according to one source, he still ad‐ we hear in our Volk movement" (p. 73). hered to his original ideas and was of the opinion Following this interpretation, Steigmann-Gall that "Church and Christianity are not identical" fnds that even those Nazis most hostile to the (p. 188). churches could still have an ambivalent relation‐ The diferences between this interpretation ship to Christianity. For example, Alfred Rosen‐ and those put forward earlier are really only ones berg, in his book, The Myth of the Twentieth Cen‐ of degree and timing. Steigmann-Gall agrees that tury, made numerous positive references to Christ from 1937 onwards, Nazi policy toward the as a fghter and antisemite, and was even warmer churches became much more hostile. The infu‐ in praise of the noted mediaeval mystic Meister ence of such notable anti-clericals as Bormann Eckhart. If the Church could be purged of its Jew‐ and Heydrich grew exponentially and was re‐ ish and Roman accretions, Rosenberg could look strained only by the need for wartime compro‐ forward to a Nordic-western soul faith which mises. On the other hand, Steigmann-Gall argues would reincarnate a purer Christianity. In this he

2 H-Net Reviews persuasively that the 's 1924 program Note: and Hitler's policy-making speeches of the early [1]. As an example of the diferences between years were not just politically motivated or decep‐ Nazi leaders, the following anecdote is recorded. tive in intent. Agreeing with the view taken by On meeting Kerrl shortly after his appointment as Hitler's fellow-countryman, the Austrian theolo‐ Church Minister, told him, "I gian Friedrich Heer, Steigmann-Gall considers thought you were only acting piously hitherto, but these speeches to be a sincere appreciation of now I see you actually are pious. I shall treat you Christianity as a value system to be upheld. Yet he badly in the future." When the astonished Kerrl is not ready to admit that this Nazi Christianity asked why, the Reichsfuehrer SS answered, "Well, was eviscerated of all the most essential orthodox in your view, the worse you are handled here be‐ dogmas. What remained was the vaguest impres‐ low, the better marks you will receive later." sion combined with anti-Jewish prejudice. Only a Copyright (c) 2003 by H-Net, all rights re‐ few radicals on the extreme wing of liberal served. H-Net permits the redistribution and Protestantism would recognize such a mish-mash reprinting of this work for nonproft, educational as true Christianity. purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the Steigmann-Gall is perfectly right to point out author, web location, date of publication, originat‐ that there never was a consensus among the lead‐ ing list, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences ing Nazis about the relationship between the Par‐ Online. For other uses contact the Reviews editori‐ ty and Christianity. As later al staf: [email protected]. commented: "Of all the leading men in the Party whom I knew, everyone interpreted the party pro‐ gram diferently [...] Rosenberg mystically, Goer‐ ing and some others in a certain sense Christian" (p. 232). Ambiguities and contradictions were nu‐ merous.[1] Over the years hostility grew despite a lingering desire to uphold an ongoing Christian el‐ ement, combining antisemitism and nationalism in some kind of positive assessment. Steigmann-Gall's achievement is to have fully explored the extensive records of the Nazi era in order to illustrate these often conficting concep‐ tions of Christianity and to assemble the evidence in a carefully weighed evaluation. In so doing, he almost makes a convincing case. But his fnal view that, in light of the post-1945 ideological impera‐ tives, Nazism had to be depicted as an evil and unchristian empire seems overdrawn. Yet he is undeniably right to point out how much Nazism owed to German Christian, especially Protestant, concepts and how much support it gained from a majority of Christians in Germany. That is certain‐ ly a sobering lesson to be drawn from this inter‐ esting and well-reasoned account.

3 H-Net Reviews

If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-german

Citation: John S. Conway. Review of Steigmann-Gall, Richard. The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945. H-German, H-Net Reviews. June, 2003.

URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=7658

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

4