Mapping the Assembly of Muslim Exceptionality and Exceptional Muslims in Colonial Modernity Ismaili Muslim Encounters Through Di

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mapping the Assembly of Muslim Exceptionality and Exceptional Muslims in Colonial Modernity Ismaili Muslim Encounters Through Di Mapping the Assembly of Muslim Exceptionality and Exceptional Muslims in Colonial Modernity Ismaili Muslim Encounters through Discourses, Bodies and Space in the Canadian Colonial Nation By Salima Bhimani A thesis in conformity with the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Education Graduate Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto © Copyright by Salima Bhimani 2013 Mapping the Assembly of Muslim Exceptionality and Exceptional Muslims in Colonial Modernity Ismaili Muslim Encounters through Discourses, Bodies and Space in the Canadian Colonial Nation Salima Bhimani Doctor of Philosophy of Education Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto 2013 Abstract What is produced through the encounters with specific “modern Muslims” in the Canadian colonial nation state? In the last decade in Canada there have been efforts to engage in a demarcation between Muslims and other racialized groups in order to define some bodies as part of the nation whilst others outside of the national imaginary. This is particularly important in the nation-building project of Canada in retaining a tolerant, liberal and multiculturally celebrated society. This critical feminist ethnography makes visible the encounters and present economies of sociopolitical currents in which the Ismailis, as a Muslim community and gendered ethnicized bodies, move and animate in Canada as a settler colonial race formation as well as in a broader geography of Muslim social and cultural politics. It is in the constitutions and movements of their collective subjectivities as a religious community and in their ethnicized gender, race, and class difference that they locate and engage in interlocking systems of power rooted in nation, empire, colonialism, modernity, and religion. This thesis aims to show that in order to make sense of Ismaili ii encounters it is necessary to map multiple pasts and multiple presents, which they are part of and that shape them. Different from most studies on the Ismailis in Canada, I also place Ismailis’ entrance and settlement in Canada within a broader dynamic of colonial power and management of racialized peoples and within current shaping of Muslims as racial constructs. This thesis argues that Ismailis are becoming Muslims of “exceptionality.” First, through their high level public encounter with the colonial settler Canadian nation state; second through their intersecting encounters with other Muslims and non-Muslims in Canada; and third in their encounters with each other as Afghan, Pakistani, and Indian Ismailis. These three encounters intervene the discourse of pluralism of which the Ismailis are becoming advocates and Canada its global exemplar. It is through seeing what is produced between these “bodies” in specific moments of their meeting in Canada that, bodily, spatial and discursive practices of social relationship making emerge. These show the paradoxical outcomes of embodying modern coloniality and Muslim exceptionality. iii Acknowledgements We begin by remembering the sound and feeling of the One Being, The well spring of Love. We affirm that the next thing we experience shimmers with the light of the whole universe. - Sufi Saying - This thesis is a labour of mind, body, and spirit. It is in service of the world and to the Divine. To say that it “takes a village” to raise a PhD is no exaggeration. I must begin then, with my thesis committee-community, Ruben, Heather and Sarfaroz, through whom I have grown tremendously. I have come to see myself as a scholar because of their willingness to bring their best to me. As an integral part of this community a great supervisor is one who understands the whole person in the student they mentor. Dr. Ruben Gaztambide-Fernandez’s steadiness, wisdom, insight, and incisive intellectual nudging provided the right balance of belief in me when I waivered and trust that there were some things I needed to figure out on my own in the puzzle of this thesis and PhD life. Mentorship is not limited to the thesis and so all the opportunities to learn the different aspects of what it means to be an academic that works in the world, I owe largely to Ruben. Being a whole person in academia also means that our emotional, intellectual, spiritual and political being is interconnected. Dr. Heather Sykes is a mentor that not only understands but has the presence, leadership and acute insight to show how to be an ally, an intellectual guide, a teacher of human relationships, a being who hears deeply and is infinitely capable of helping one see the many hues in any given situation. These lessons, particularly as women in academia, have made me a better teacher and academic, something only Heather could have taught me. There are other wonderful professors who have given me opportunities to teach and to be in generative conversations that have shaped me greatly. Dr. John Portelli has taught me much about living theory as your practice and making the practice, your theory. Thank you also Tara Goldstein, Lance McCready, Roland Sintos Coloma, Kathy Bickmore, Kathy Broad, and Usha James for your gifts to me. Also, thank you to the administrative staff, Cheryl, Danny, Terry-Louise, Karolina, amongst others for your help vi throughout the years. Finally I want to thank my thesis defence committee and in particular Sunera Thobani, the external examiner, whose insightful feedback and necessary intellectual challenges provided a dialogue with the thesis and me that I had been longing for. A thesis is not simply words on a page or research in narrative form. In this thesis it is the very lives of people that are present. Without the participants’ generous sharing this thesis would not be what it is. Thank you for your honesty, trust and willingness to voice the complexity of your experiences. Thank you also to the Ismaili community for giving me a space to do such work. The friendships made while in academia are possibly quite unique as it is rather difficult for those not in the throws of PhD life to really understand its many nuances, grooves, tensions, joys, struggles and opportunities. Kirk and Jaddon made coming to OISE an event that was always uplifting. They managed to transform an office space into a home away from home. I am tremendously grateful to have had a community of powerful women - up and coming scholars who were my embodied academic sisters in solidarity: Sameena, Christina, Zahra and Chandni. Christina, Zahra and Chandni provided the intellectual circle where I could walk in my work through their questions, readings of draft chapters, and feedback only these brilliant women could provide. You were integral in helping me see how to put the puzzle together in those early stages. After years of writing and coming to the last sentence of the thesis, it is hard to always know whether in fact one is saying anything of value. Thank you Zahra, Fayaz, Chandni and Shaira for reading my thesis and helping me see it for what it is and for asking questions that reminded me of the gaps, silences and gems. Sometimes in this academic circle, one also needs someone who will firmly hold your hand and remind you of where you want to go, no matter what. Chandni has been that person, without whom that last year of the PhD would not have been what it was. My friends outside of OISE have carried the weight of this process for me and with me as well. Thank you to Zainab, Samira and Amina. Finally, to my sister Shaira, who is not only one of the most amazing women in my family lineage but is also my teacher, my friend, my intellectual partner, and the centre of my soul. Not having to leave home to bring home the excitement and challenge of the intellectual journey reminded me that this is the work of our family, not just my own. Thank you for this very special space you made available to me. When we write and create from a place of producing ripples in the world, one inevitably reflects on the impact this can have on family. Thank you, (Zainab, Alikhan, Sherrise, Riaz, Mo, Murad, Munir, Rahim, Didar Mama, Amina Mami, Parin Mami, and Fui’s and Fua’s) for standing vii by me, even when you didn’t always understand what I was doing and for “having my back.” To my sisters, Ferenaz and Nimira, I know I can always count on you and know that I will be held in love and confidence. You have done this and more, for me, throughout this process. To my nieces and nephews, Amy, Jenna, Imaan, Noah, Maya and Azaan this work is as much for you and your future, as it is for this moment. I hope the courage of this work will continue to inspire and feed your own incredible spirits and life purpose. Thank you to the McMonagles – Michelle, Uncle Fionn, Greta, Melinda and Kevin for showering me with that special McMonagle laughter and love that sustained me through these years. I grew up with my mom telling me that a child’s joys, sorrows and successes belong to the parents, as much as they are the child’s. All of who I am and what this work is I owe to my parents. Thank you for the tiniest to universe-enveloping bits of love, understanding, dedication and generosity of every kind. Dad, you taught me to work hard and to do what you need to in life. It’s a lesson I carry with me all the time. Mom, you are one of the greatest inspirations in my life. You never asked me to leave myself or be to anyone less than who I am.
Recommended publications
  • City of London
    300 Oufferin Avenue P.O. Box 5035 London, ON N6A4L9 London CANADA December 6,2005 Chair and Members Board of Control RE: Meeting of the National Board of Directors - Federation Canadian Municipalities Ottawa, Ontario - December I-3,2005 We are very pleased to provide the following summary and a copy of the FCM's election strategy for the Board of Control's information: INTRODUCTION Overview FCM's National Board of Directors met in Ottawa, December 1-3, 2005, for its regular meeting. With the January 23 federal election as a backdrop, the Board called on all federal parties to clarify where they stand on key municipal issues. Of specific concern during the course of the campaign, the Board identified the need to secure a long-term legislated commitment to eliminating the infrastructure deficit, as well as the need to secure the quick transfer of money for affordable housing and transit contained in Bill C-48, and to develop a strong partnership between the Government of Canada and the municipal sector. As part of this call, the Board urged the broadcasters' consortium that will organize the four scheduled leader's debates to guarantee municipal issues would be discussed (see attached news release). Televised debate In keeping with its proactive strategy, the Board kicked off the proceedings with a nationally broadcast town-hall meeting with representatives of the Liberal, Conservative and New Democratic parties to discuss and debate where the three parties stand on municipal issues. Board members heard and questioned John Godfrey, Minister of State for Infrastructure and Communities, and opposition critics Rahim Jaffer of the Conservative Party of Canada and David Christopherson of the New Democratic Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Safeguarding Asylum - Sustaining Canada's Commitments to Refugees
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA SAFEGUARDING ASYLUM - SUSTAINING CANADA'S COMMITMENTS TO REFUGEES Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration Norman Doyle, M.P. Chair MAY 2007 39th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION The Speaker of the House hereby grants permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part for use in schools and for other purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary. Any commercial or other use or reproduction of this publication requires the express prior written authorization of the Speaker of the House of Commons. If this document contains excerpts or the full text of briefs presented to the Committee, permission to reproduce these briefs, in whole or in part, must be obtained from their authors. Also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire: http://www.parl.gc.ca Available from Communication Canada — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 SAFEGUARDING ASYLUM - SUSTAINING CANADA'S COMMITMENTS TO REFUGEES Report of the Standing Committee on CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Norman Doyle, M.P. Chair MAY 2007 39th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION STANDING COMMITTEE ON CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION CHAIR Norman Doyle, M.P. VICE-CHAIRS Hon. Andrew Telegdi, M.P. Meili Faille, M.P. MEMBERS Omar Alghabra, M.P. Dave Batters, M.P. Barry Devolin, M.P. Raymond Gravel, M.P. Nina Grewal, M.P. Jim Karygiannis, M.P. Ed Komarnicki, M.P. Bill Siksay, M.P. Blair Wilson, M.P. OTHER MEMBERS WHO PARTICIPATED Johanne Deschamps, M.P. Raymonde Folco, M.P. Rahim Jaffer, M.P. CLERKS OF THE COMMITTEE Samy Agha Bill Farrell LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Parliamentary Information and Research Service Andrew Kitching Jennifer Bird iii THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION has the honour to present its FIFTEENTH REPORT Pursuant to its mandate under Standing Order 108(2), your Committee has conducted a study on Refugee Issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Contesting Citizenship and Faith: Muslim Claims-Making in Canada and the United States, 2001-2008 Sara Nuzhat Amin Department Of
    Contesting Citizenship and Faith: Muslim claims-making in Canada and the United States, 2001-2008 Sara Nuzhat Amin Department of Sociology McGill University, Montreal July 2010 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of PhD in Sociology Copyright © Sara Nuzhat Amin 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ 5 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1: CONTESTING CITIZENSHIP AND FAITH: RESEARCH QUESTIONS, HYPOTHESES, DESIGN AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .............................................. 9 1.1 GOALS AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS ................................................................................. 13 1.2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: COLLECTIVE IDENTITY AND THE ROLE OF POLITICAL CONTEXT, COMPETING DISCOURSES, AND BIOGRAPHY IN ITS CONSTRUCTION .............................................. 16 1.2.1 Collective Identity Processes ............................................................................ 17 1.2.2 Citizenship as collective identity: political context and competing discourses 20 1.3 COMPETING DISCOURSES FACED BY MUSLIM ACTORS REGARDING FAITH AND CITIZENSHIP ........ 24 1.3.1 Competing Discourses in Liberal Democratic Citizenship ................................. 25 1.3.1.1 Rights: Individual vs. Collective Rights ...................................................... 27 1.3.1.2 Practice: The place
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson Office of the Ethics Commissioner Parliament of Canada P.O
    Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson Office of the Ethics Commissioner Parliament of Canada P.O. Box 16, Centre Block 22nd Floor, 66 Slater Ottawa, Ontario KlA 046 Fax: 613-995-7308 May 4, 2012 RE: Petition for investigations of, and rulings on, situations involving Conservative government representatives and Rahim Jaffer Dear Commissioner Dawson, After reviewing research conducted by the reputable group Democracy Watch, I am filing this letter to petition for, under the provisions of the federal Conflict of Interest Act (Act), an investigation of and ruling on the actions of Conservative government representatives. I submit this petition as the Member of Parliament for Saanich-Gulf Islands. According to thorough research by Democracy Watch, Rahim Jaffer communicated and/or met with various representatives of the Conservative government on behalf of various companies in 2009 and 2010, and in one case his associate Patrick Glémaud attended a meeting. Democracy Watch believes these representatives are covered by the Act and I tend to agree. Documents totalling 68 pages were disclosed on Wednesday April 28, 2010 to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Government Operations and after review, I agree with Democracy Watch's opinion that the documents provide reason to believe that the representatives of the Conservative government gave the companies and people preferential treatment because Mr. Jaffer was representing the companies and people. Democracy Watch has made available the collection of documents at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/jaffer-documents.pdf Below, Democracy Watch provides opinions regarding the situations that provide reasons to believe that preferential treatment was given to the companies and people because Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 207 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, May 5, 2015 (Part A) Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 13425 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, May 5, 2015 The House met at 10 a.m. who have asked our government to give serious consideration to offering protection to Christians who are being the special targets of persecution in Iraq by putting in place a special program to bring these Christians into Canada if they would like to come. Prayers SEX SELECTION Mr. Leon Benoit (Vegreville—Wainwright, CPC): Mr. Speaker, ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS the second petition is to do with gender selection abortion. The Ï (1005) petitioners ask Parliament to condemn the practice of discrimination [English] against girls through gender selection abortion. GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS PUBLIC TRANSIT Hon. Greg Rickford (Minister of Natural Resources and Mr. Matthew Kellway (Beaches—East York, NDP): Mr. Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Speaker, I am very pleased to rise today to present three petitions Northern Ontario, CPC): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order to the House. The first petition calls for a national public transit 36(8) I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the strategy noting that Canada is the only OECD country that does not government's response to 12 petitions. have such a strategy and it calls upon the House to provide a *** permanent investment plan to support public transit in Canada. ANTI-TERRORISM ACT, 2015 THE ENVIRONMENT Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..52 Committee
    Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage CHPC Ï NUMBER 074 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 42nd PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Wednesday, September 27, 2017 Chair The Honourable Hedy Fry 1 Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Wednesday, September 27, 2017 The second point is that the motion condemns all forms of religious discrimination and calls upon the government to advance Ï (1540) initiatives to better reflect the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I note [English] that freedom of religion and conscience is the first fundamental The Chair (Hon. Hedy Fry (Vancouver Centre, Lib.)): The freedom enumerated in our charter. I welcome a robust embrace of meeting is called to order. Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), this religious freedom, but note that it is often the government, through committee is studying systemic racism and religious discrimination. legislation and regulation, that impinges upon religious freedom. That is true for Jews and Christians as well as for Muslims. To focus We have a group of witnesses scheduled in our first hour, which is therefore on one particular religion would be, I think, unwise. from 3:30 to 4:30. This means, because we started late, that we may have to go a little beyond 4:30 with the first group. We have, as an individual, Raymond J. de Souza; the International Christian Voice, A renewed culture of religious freedom is to be welcomed, Peter Bhatti, chairman; and the Justice Centre for Constitutional especially in a political culture in which often all religious belief and Freedoms, Jay Cameron, barrister and solicitor. Welcome. practice is accorded second-class status.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CIVIL CONVERSATION E-NEWSLETTER of CIVITAS CANADA January 2020 Edition
    THE CIVIL CONVERSATION E-NEWSLETTER OF CIVITAS CANADA January 2020 Edition IN THIS ISSUE EDITOR'S NOTE William Brooks PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Miles Smit ESSAY: A RESPONSE TO OPPONENTS OF FREE EXPRESSION ON CAMPUS Mark Mercer DIALECTIC ON IMMIGRATION POLICY Ezra Levant debates Rahim Mohammed AND ANOTHER THING Growing interest in our organization – Speakers’ Forums across Canada - An appeal for grassroots support …and more. Editor: William Brooks Format Editor: Pamela Workman, PuBlication Manager: Melanie Harvie Editorial Advisory Board: Jackson Doughart, Janice Fiamengo, William Gairdner, Omid Ghoreishi, Brianna Heinrichs-Morris, Marco Navarro-Genie and Stephen Perrott. Founding Editor: Rory Leishman ContriButions: We encourage members to submit essays and other contributions. Essays of any reasonable length are welcome. Submissions to “And Another Thing!” are limited to about 300 words but may include links to longer articles. Any submission may be edited for length and clarity. All correspondence should be sent to [email protected]. The Civil Conversation is published three times a year by the Civitas Society of Canada. EDITOR'S NOTE William Brooks In this first edition of The Civil Conversation for the 20s readers will find a heartfelt encouragement for organizational renewal by current Civitas President, Miles Smit. Your follow- up on our President’s call to action could make an enormous difference for the growth of the Civitas Society over the coming decade. Our featured essay by Mark Mercer, PhD, Department of Philosophy, Saint Mary’s University and President of The Society for Academic Freedom and Scholarship, is a must read for those troubled by the expanding opposition to free expression in Canadian schools and institutions of higher learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaders' Debates Commission Names Debates Producer Dated July 31, 2019
    Court File No. FEDERAL COURT B E T W E E N : ANDREW JAMES LAWTON and TRUE NORTH CENTRE FOR PUBLIC POLICY Applicants - and - CANADA (LEADERS’ DEBATES COMMISSION/COMMISSION DES DEBATS DES CHEFS) and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents - and - B E T W E E N : REBEL NEWS NETWORK LTD. Applicant - and - CANADA (LEADERS’ DEBATES COMMISSION/COMMISSION DES DEBATS DES CHEFS) and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents RESPONDING MOTION RECORD OF THE RESPONDENT, LEADERS’ DEBATES COMMISSION October 6, 2019 BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP Barristers and Solicitors Bay Adelaide Centre, East Tower 22 Adelaide St. W Toronto, ON M5H 4E3 Ewa Krajewska (LSO #57704D) Tel: (416) 367-6244 Fax: (416) 367-6749 Email : [email protected] Ashley Thomassen (LSO #73361M) Tel: (416) 367-6509 Fax: (416) 367-6749 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Respondent, Leaders’ Debates Commission TO: THE REGISTRAR Federal Court of Canada 180 Queen Street W., Suite 200 Toronto, ON M5V 3L6 AND TO: CASSELS BROCK & BLACKWELL LLP 2100 Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, ON M5H 3C2 Jessica L. Kuredjian (LSO #68794N) Tel: (416) 815-4251 Fax: (416) 640-3020 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Applicants, Andrew James Lawson and True North Centre for Public Policy AND TO: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Department of Justice 120 Adelaide Street West Suite 400 Toronto, ON M5H 1T1 John Provart Tel: (647) 256-0842 Fax: (416) 954-8982 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Respondent, The Attorney General of Canada INDEX TAB DESCRIPTION A. Affidavit of Michel Cormier affirmed October 6, 2019 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Electing a Diverse Canada
    Electing a Diverse Canada Edited by Caroline Andrew, John Biles, Myer Siemiatycki, and Erin Tolley Electing a Diverse Canada The Representation of Immigrants, Minorities, and Women © UBC Press 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of the publisher, or, in Canada, in the case of photocopying or other reprographic copying, a licence from Access Copyright (Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency), www.accesscopyright.ca. 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in Canada on ancient-forest-free paper (100 percent post-consumer recycled) that is processed chlorine- and acid-free, with vegetable-based inks. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Electing a diverse Canada: the representation of immigrants, minorities, and women / edited by Caroline Andrew ... [et al.]. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7748-1485-0 1. Minorities – Canada – Political activity. 2. Immigrants – Canada – Political activity. 3. Women in politics – Canada. 4. Political participation – Canada. 5. Representative government and representation – Canada. 6. Canada – Politics and government – 2006-. I. Andrew, Caroline, 1942- JL186.5.E44 2008 324’.08900971 C2008-903463-5 UBC Press gratefully acknowledges the financial support for our publishing program of the Government of Canada through the Book Publishing Industry Development Program (BPIDP), and of the Canada Council for the Arts, and the British Columbia Arts Council. This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, through the Aid to Scholarly Publications Programme, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • When Do Religious Minorities' Grievances Lead to Peaceful Or
    Inclusion of a paper in the Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should limit in any other venue. Copyright remains with the authors. Inclusion of a paper in the Working Papers serve to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior publicaton encourage exchange ideas and academic debate. Working GIGA GIGA Research Programme: Peace and Security ___________________________ When Do Religious Minorities’ Grievances Lead to Peaceful or Violent Protest? Evidence from Canada’s Jewish and Muslim Communities Christopher Huber and Matthias Basedau No 313 September 2018 www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers GIGA Working Papers 313/2018 Edited by the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Leibniz‐Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien The GIGA Working Papers series serves to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior to publication in order to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presenta‐ tions are less than fully polished. Inclusion of a paper in the GIGA Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should not limit publication in any other venue. Copy‐ right remains with the authors. GIGA Research Programme “Peace and Security” Copyright for this issue: © Christopher Huber and Matthias Basedau Editorial Assistance and Production: Silvia Bücke All GIGA Working Papers are available online and free of charge on the website <www.giga‐hamburg.de/workingpapers>. For any requests please contact: <workingpapers@giga‐hamburg.de> The GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this Working Paper; the views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, March 20, 2001
    CANADA VOLUME 137 S NUMBER 032 S 1st SESSION S 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1869 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, March 20, 2001 The House met at 10 a.m. and asked me about the interview. At first I covered for my assistant, a man who has competently and loyally worked for me _______________ and our constituency from the beginning. I told the producer that it was actually me on the radio. I lied. Prayers D (1005) _______________ It was wrong for my assistant to appear on the radio claiming to D (1000) be me and it was wrong for me to cover that up. [English] My assistant and I have since telephoned the show to apologize PRIVILEGE and my assistant has resigned. He is sorry for pretending to be me. I am sorry for trying to gloss over his error. MEMBER FOR EDMONTON-STRATHCONA Mr. Rahim Jaffer (Edmonton—Strathcona, Canadian Al- I have already apologized to Peter Warren, the host of the show, liance): Mr. Speaker, I have been doing a lot of soul-searching over and to all of his listeners across Canada. Today, Mr. Speaker, I the past three days and would like to share my thoughts. would like to offer to you, as the Speaker of this legislature and my friend, my apologies for not living up to the standards of the House.
    [Show full text]