Podiform Chromite at Voskhod, Kazakhstan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Podiform Chromite at Voskhod, Kazakhstan PODIFORM CHROMITE AT VOSKHOD, KAZAKHSTAN Caroline Johnson Submitter in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. November, 2012 Somewhat unconventionally, this thesis is for me. Caroline Johnson “I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.” Douglas Adams (1952-2001) Abstract The Voskhod podiform chromitite is one of more than 30 chromitite deposits that collectively form the Main Ore Field (MOF) within the Kempirsai Massif, in Kazakhstan. The MOF is the largest podiform chromitite ore-field in the world. The Voskhod deposit, encased in a serpentinised dunite halo, is situated within harzburgite units that comprise the mantle sequence of the Kempirsai ophiolite. This study arose from a unique opportunity to work on drill core samples through an un-mined podiform chromite deposit and investigate its internal structure, composition and genesis. The 18Mt ore-body has a strike of 600 m, is 170 m to 360 m wide and has an average thickness of 39 m. It has an immediate dunite halo between 1 m and 5 m thick. The ore body is made up of multiple stacked chromitite layers. Mineralised layers are separated by barren dunite or by weakly disseminated dunite lenses ranging from <1 m to 50 m. The style of mineralization varies throughout the ore body; the central region is dominated by thick (>5 – 45 m) units of massive chromite (>80% chromite), with progression towards the south west disseminated chromite (10 – 40% chromite) becomes increasingly abundant. Drill core logging and cross- section profiling of the internal structure of the ore body has identified an intricately connected network of what appear to be chromite-filled channel-ways. Outside of the halo the host rocks are inter-layered harzburgite and dunite. Accessory chromite in harzburgite has an average Cr# of 0.31 compared to Cr# 0.49 in the dunite. The harzburgites are depleted, having formed from intermediate degrees of partial melting (~15 – 18 %) of a fertile mantle source at a mid-ocean ridge (MOR) setting. The dunite units have transitional geochemical fingerprints that imply they formed from the interaction of MOR mantle harzburgite with both mid ocean ridge baslt-melt and an arc derived-melt. They are not the products of extremely high degrees of partial melting. The encasing dunite halo is extensively serpentinised (>80%). Chromite is only present as an accessory phase having an average Cr# of 0.62. The dunite has a geochemical signature indicating that it formed by reaction between residual harzburgite and a boninite melt in supra- subduction zone (SSZ) tectonic setting. A variety of geochemical fingerprints have been identified; residual MOR harzburgite, reacted- MOR dunite, reacted-SSZ dunite and harzburgite, indicating that the mantle section has had a i polygenetic tectonic evolution, recording both ocean basin opening (MOR setting) and closing (SSZ setting) events. Trace element and REE whole rock geochemistry of the chromitites and associated host rocks provide evidence of depletion and a later-stage LREE-enrichment event. LREE-enrichment is most intense within and immediately adjacent to the chromitite. Chromites from the ore zone are at the Cr-rich extreme for podiform chromites (Cr# ave. 0.80- 0.85) and are TiO2 poor (ave. 0.16 wt%), similar to chromite in boninite worldwide and nearby. Al/Ti ratios have been used to calculate the composition of the parent melts from which the Voskhod podiform chromitite crystallised: compositions that are synonymous with a boninite melt composition. Chemical variation in chromite is systematic and on a much smaller scale than was anticipated. Even variations in a single thin section provide key evidence for different magmatic processes. An apparent melt-rock reaction in harzburgite has been examined in freeze-frame. The chromite chemistry has been investigated at 50 cm, 1 cm and 1 mm scales. Compositional differences were identified on the basis of MgO% and FeO(t)% compositions. Diagrams FeO- Fe2O3 and Cr# - Mg# were used to demonstrate the variations and identify relationships. Broad cryptic layering on a 50 cm scale has been found as well as fine-cryptic layering on a 1 – 8 cm scale. The variations are interpreted to reflect differences in the mineral phases crystallised from the melt; periods when on chromite only crystallised are distinguished from periods when both chromite with olivine crystallised. It seems likely that the deposit is made up of thousands of episodes of chromite accumulation that formed in an intermittently replenished open-system. It also seems likely that the conduit was never a single melt-filled cavity; instead melt flow was focused through the mantle over an extended period. The conduit appears to be comprised of multiple branches, as chromite (± olivine) crystallised from the melt the channel-way became blocked and the melt was forced to deviate and make a new pathway through the mantle. As time elapsed the process resulted in the formation of stacked chromitite lenses, creating an orebody that has an internal arrangement of chromitite and dunite unites which resemble a stacked braided 'delta'. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Sincere thanks to Iain McDonald for his patience, time and encouragement. Thank you to my supervisors, Chris Neary, Julian Pearce and Hazel Prichard as well as my industry mentor Nic Barcza for their help and advice. I owe a large debt of gratitude to; Nic Barcza, Chris Powers, Matt Boyes, Simon Apps, Kevin Alexander and Lisa Pereira for all their technical help, logistical support and kindness – it was a pleasure to work with you. Without their efforts this project would not have been possible. Peter Fisher has been of invaluable assistance and equally patient during the long periods of time I have spent on the SEM. Lawrence Badham and Peter Greatbatch were responsible for making hundreds of polished thin sections between them. Iain McDonald and Ley Woolley were efficient at running many sample solutions on the mass spectrometers at Cardiff and very kind to teach me the methods for sample preparation in the geochemistry laboratory. A big thank you to Ian Parkinson and Andy Tindle, who supervised my use of the EMP at the Open University. Extra thanks to Millie and Anna, who “on-the-day” agreed to accommodate me during my time at the O.U and were really very lovely. Thank you to; Matthew Minifie, Tracy Aze, Tom Gregory, Alan Hastie, Bryan Hatton, Sarah Dare, Freddie Spyre, Aggie Georgeopoulou, Ruth Liley, Namaste Nicolai and David Thornalley for your unending moral support and more importantly - the laughter. Thanks is also expressed to my magma process group officemates Chris Brough, Kerry Howard and Iain Neill. I acknowledge the funding for this project from Cardiff University, Oriel Resources Plc. and an additional annual contribution from SRK. Travel grants from the SEG, GSSA, MDSG and IOM3 Andrew Carnegie fund to attend conferences and field trips have been greatly appreciated. Finally, thank you to my parents, Geoffrey and Gillian as well as to my sisters, Bertie and Minnie, who have been gracious enough to express continual faith in my ability. iii Table of Contents Page Abstract i Acknowledgements iii Contents iv Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Ophiolites 3 2.1 Ophiolite stratigraphy 4 2.1.1 Crustal units 5 2.1.2 Mantle units 6 2.1.3 Chromite in the ophiolite sequence 7 2.2 Ophiolite formation and emplacement 8 2.2.1 Tectonic settings: Mantle and melt geochemistry 9 2.2.1.1 Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt (MORB) 11 2.2.1.2 Boninite 12 2.2.1.3 Island-Arc Tholeiite (IAT) and Calc-Alkaline Basalt (CAB) 13 2.2.2 Mantle peridotite types 14 2.2.2.1 Abyssal peridotite 14 2.2.2.2 Forearc Peridotite 15 2.2.3 Ophiolite mantle peridotite 15 2.2.4 Limitations relating mantle peridotites and crustal lavas 16 2.3 Geochemistry: A tool for tectonic reconstruction 17 2.3.1 Monogenetic and polygenetic tectonic settings 18 2.3.1.1 Melt-rock reaction within monogenetic tectonic settings 19 2.3.1.2 Melt-rock reaction within polygenetic tectonic settings 19 2.4 Ophiolite types 20 2.5 Ophiolites of the Urals 21 Chapter 3. Chromite 24 3.1 Chromium 24 3.1.1 Uses of chromium 25 3.2 Chromite deposits 26 3.2.1 Stratiform chromitite 27 3.2.1.1 Chromite crystallisation models: Stratiform chromitite 29 iv 3.2.2 Ophiolitic chromite 31 3.2.2.1 Ophiolite chromite: Crustal cumulates 32 3.2.2.2 Ophiolite chromite: Mantle hosted podiform chromitite 33 3.3 Podiform chromitite genesis models 38 3.3.1.1 The chromitite-dyke hypothesis 40 3.3.1.2 Mixing multistage-melts 42 3.3.1.3 The melt-rock reaction models 43 3.3.1.4 Water and chromite formation 46 3.4 Chromite geochemistry 47 3.4.1 Conditions that impact the composition of chromite crystallised from a melt 48 3.5 Geochemical variation and trends in chromite 55 3.5.1 The Fe-Ti Trend 56 3.5.2 The Cr-Al Trend 57 3.5.2.1 Sub-solidus re-equilibration between chromite and olivine 58 3.5.3 The Rhum Trend 58 3.5.4 Mg#-Cr# relationships and understanding chromite genesis 59 3.5.4.1 Trend A 60 3.5.4.2 Trend B 62 3.5.5 Cyclic layering and chromitite layers 63 3.6 Chromite alteration 63 3.6.1 Accessory chromite morphologies: Proposed mechanisms of formation 65 3.6.2 Silicate inclusions in chromite 65 3.6.3 Chromite ore types 66 3.6.4 Densification of chromite: Mechanisms and features 68 3.6.4.1 Mechanical separation: Drifting velocity 69 3.6.4.2 Overgrowth – Postcumulus reaction with a chrome-rich liquid 69 3.6.4.3 Post-cumulus reaction between chromite, plagioclase and a late-stage liquid 70 3.6.4.4 Compaction - Sintering 70 3.6.4.5 Deformation: Grain boundary features 72 Chapter 4.
Recommended publications
  • Orbital Debris: a Chronology
    NASA/TP-1999-208856 January 1999 Orbital Debris: A Chronology David S. F. Portree Houston, Texas Joseph P. Loftus, Jr Lwldon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas David S. F. Portree is a freelance writer working in Houston_ Texas Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ iv Preface ........................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... vii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ ix The Chronology ............................................................................................................. 1 1961 ......................................................................................................................... 4 1962 ......................................................................................................................... 5 963 ......................................................................................................................... 5 964 ......................................................................................................................... 6 965 ......................................................................................................................... 6 966 ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UK Military Hovercraft Trials Units
    Appendix 1 UK Military Hovercraft Trials Units Background When Christopher Cockerell was seeking support for the development of the hovercraft principle, it was the intervention of the late Earl Mountbatten that was of signifi cant help. With his background in Amphibious Warfare, he immediately saw the potential for this new concept, so much so that it was initially classifi ed as Top Secret. Eventually, the Saunders Roe, SR.N1, was built and launched on 11 June 1959 to further evaluate the potential of the concept. This new vehicle attracted great pub- licity and interest in the UK. Military interest led to the formation of an Interservice Hovercraft Working Party in 1961 and the formation of the Interservice Hovercraft (Trials) Unit (IHTU) at HMS Ariel (later HMS Daedalus), at Lee-on-the-Solent just west of Portsmouth harbour. IHTU personnel were drawn from the Royal Navy, Royal Marines, Royal Air Force and the Army. The different Service backgrounds and training assisted both in routine maintenance and fault fi nding on these special craft. Additionally, after the traditional 3-year tour, personnel were drafted to active units and able to spread the message about the usefulness of amphibious hovercraft. Figure A1.1 shows the Unit in the NHTU days with SR.N6, BH 7 and VT 2 craft present. The Early Days In order to evaluate hovercraft military potential, to start with craft were hired from their manufacturers and operated from Lee-on-the-Solent. These evaluations served the double purpose of enabling Service personnel to gain experience of hovercraft operations and assisting manufacturers in the development of their craft.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Manned Space Flights Spacecalc
    CBS News Manned Space Flights Current through STS-117 Table of Manned Space Flights SpaceCalc Total: 260 Crew Launch Land Duration By Robert A. Braeunig* Vostok 1 Yuri Gagarin 04/12/61 04/12/61 1h:48m First manned space flight (1 orbit). MR 3 Alan Shepard 05/05/61 05/05/61 15m:22s First American in space (suborbital). Freedom 7. MR 4 Virgil Grissom 07/21/61 07/21/61 15m:37s Second suborbital flight; spacecraft sank, Grissom rescued. Liberty Bell 7. Vostok 2 Guerman Titov 08/06/61 08/07/61 1d:01h:18m First flight longer than 24 hours (17 orbits). MA 6 John Glenn 02/20/62 02/20/62 04h:55m First American in orbit (3 orbits); telemetry falsely indicated heatshield unlatched. Friendship 7. MA 7 Scott Carpenter 05/24/62 05/24/62 04h:56m Initiated space flight experiments; manual retrofire error caused 250 mile landing overshoot. Aurora 7. Vostok 3 Andrian Nikolayev 08/11/62 08/15/62 3d:22h:22m First twinned flight, with Vostok 4. Vostok 4 Pavel Popovich 08/12/62 08/15/62 2d:22h:57m First twinned flight. On first orbit came within 3 miles of Vostok 3. MA 8 Walter Schirra 10/03/62 10/03/62 09h:13m Developed techniques for long duration missions (6 orbits); closest splashdown to target to date (4.5 miles). Sigma 7. MA 9 Gordon Cooper 05/15/63 05/16/63 1d:10h:20m First U.S. evaluation of effects of one day in space (22 orbits); performed manual reentry after systems failure, landing 4 miles from target.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Spring 2004 Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 57 Article 1 Number 2 Spring 2004 Full Spring 2004 Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2004) "Full Spring 2004 Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 57 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol57/iss2/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Full Spring 2004 Issue N A V A L W A R C O L L E G E NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW R E V I E W Spring 2004 Volume LVII, Number 2 Spring 2004 Spring N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O N L L U E E G H E T R I VI IBU OR A S CT MARI VI Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2004 1 Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Naval War College Review, Vol. 57 [2004], No. 2, Art. 1 Cover A Landsat-7 image (taken on 27 July 2000) of the Lena Delta on the Russian Arctic coast, where the Lena River emp- ties into the Laptev Sea. The Lena, which flows northward some 2,800 miles through Siberia, is one of the largest rivers in the world; the delta is a pro- tected wilderness area, the largest in Rus- sia.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Soviet Propaganda-Design Satellites
    ORBIT Early Soviet Propaganda-Design Satellites By Don Hillger and Garry Toth 2) One or two shark-like fins attached to the main body of the spacecraft. Sometimes only one of these fins is seen, This article examines a propaganda-design satellite that was with the other hidden on the opposite side of the widely used in the past as a substitute for the actual designs spacecraft; of some satellites launched by the USSR. This Soviet propaganda-design satellite is commonly shown in early 3) One or more sets of three radial antennas, with the space-age postal items. On many of the stamps that include three antennas in each set attached to the spacecraft body it, the text mentions various satellite names such as Kosmos, at a single point. Generally, one antenna in each set is Luna, Vostok (East), or Voskhod (Ascent). These satellites are perpendicular to the spacecraft body and the two others known to never have had the design shown; the propaganda are at about a 60 degree angle from the spacecraft body. design was used in lieu of realistic satellite images for both un-manned and manned missions. Most propaganda designs have all three design elements; some are missing one of them. The propaganda design may have been a compromise between the stamp and cachet designers, who wanted to Early history of the propaganda design depict the new spacecraft, and the Soviet censors, whose goal was to keep secret as many aspects as possible of their The first appearance of the early space programme The propaganda design was used to propaganda design generically represent various satellites, for lack of better (actually, a design variant) is images.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaceflight Now Current Space Demographic Data
    Spaceflight Now Current Space Demographics Updated through STS-101 Spaceflight Now Current Space Demographic Data Post STS-101 Data Rank Nation No. Records Days Flights Total Fliers 393 1 U.S. 245 Avdeyev 748 3 Men 357 2 USSR 72 V. Polyakov 679 2 Women 36 3 CIS 21 A. Solovyov 652 5 Total Tickets 840 4 Germany 9 Afanasayev 546 3 5 France 8 Manarov 541 2 United States 245 5 Canada 8 Viktorenko 489 4 US Men 217 6 Japan 5 Krikalev 484 4 US Women 28 7 Italy 3 Romanenko 430 3 Soviet Union 72 8 Bulgaria 2 Volkov 392 3 USSR Men 70 Afghanistan 1 V. Titov 387 4 USSR Women 2 Austria 1 Usachev 386 3 CIS 21 Belgium 1 Tsibliev 383 2 CIS Men 20 Britain 1 Kizim 375 3 CIS Women 1 Cuba 1 Serebrov 374 4 Others 55 Czechoslovakia 1 Ryumin 372 4 Other Men 50 East Germany 1 Solovyev 362 2 Other Women 5 Hungary 1 Kaleri 343 2 India 1 Musabayev 334 2 Men with 6 flights 5 Mexico 1 Women with 6 flights 0 Mongolia 1 YEARS 23 55 Men with 5 flights 10 Netherlands 1 Women with 5 flights 4 North Vietnam 1 U.S. Data Days Flights Men with 4 flights 37 Poland 1 Women with 4 flights 3 Romania 1 S. Lucid 188 5 Men with 3 flights 67 Saudi Arabia 1 Skylab 4 84 1 Women with 3 flights 9 Spain 1 S. Musgrave 54 6 All with 2 flights 94 Switzerland 1 John Young 35 6 Page 1 Spaceflight Now Current Space Demographics Updated through STS-101 All with 1 flight 164 Syria 1 Phase One 977 7 Slovakia 1 TOTAL 393 TOTALS 29 393 YEARS 3.67 13 Astronaut/Cosmonaut 1 Flight 2 Flights 3 Flights 4 Flights 5 Flights 6 Flights Name Flts Sex-Nation 164 94 76 40 14 5 Acton, Loren 1 M-US STS-51F Adamson, James 2 M-US STS-28 STS-44 Afanasyev, Viktor 3 M-USSR TM-11 TM-18 TM-29 Akers, Thomas 4 M-US STS-41 STS-49 STS-61 STS-79 Akiyama, Toyohiro 1 M-Japan TM-11 Aksenov, Vladimir 2 M-USSR Soyuz 22 Soyuz T2 Aldrin, Edwin 2 M-US Gemini 12 Apollo 11 Alexandrov, Alexander 2 M-USSR Soyuz T9 TM-3 Alexandrov, Alexander 1 M-Bulgaria TM-5 Allen, Andrew 3 M-US STS-46 STS-62 STS-75 Allen, Joseph 2 M-US STS-5 STS-51A AlSaud, Sultan 1 M-S.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Unseen Values Yıldırım Group AGENDA Yılmaden Holding
    YILMADEN HOLDING Discovering The Unseen Values Yıldırım Group AGENDA Yılmaden Holding Mining and Exploration Assets Strengths and Core Values Subsidiaries Social Responsibility Yıldırım Group Sectors Integrated Operations in Financial 9 Sectors Investments Port Management Construction Coal & Coke Inernational Fertilizer & Trade Chemicals Marine & Logistics Metals & Energy Mining Yıldırım Group Where we are RUSSIA LITHUANIA KAZAKHSTAN Across 5 SWEDEN BELGIUM FINLAND Continents NORWAY & 51 IRELAND UK Countries DENMARK CANADA NETHERLANDS UNITED STATES FRANCE SWITZERLAND UZBEKİSTANCHINA MEXICO HONDURAS SPAIN PORTUGAL TAIWAN COLOMBIA MOROCCO GUATEMALA TURKEY THAILAND COSTA RICA ITALY SERBIA VIETNAM MALTA ECUADOR ZAMBIA TANZANIA INDIA PERU GREECE SINGAPORE INDONESIA MALAWI CHILE ANGOLA BRAZIL BANGLADESH MOZAMBIQUE NAMIBIA URUGUAY ZIMBABWE SOUTH AFRICA ARGENTINA Yıldırım Group Overwiev Ranking Market Shares METALS & MINING FERTILIZERS & CHEMICALS COAL & COKE Turkey’s Turkey’s Turkey’s Chrome Ore CAN Producer Metallurgical #1 Producer #1 CAN Exporter #1 Coke Importer Ammonia Exporter World’s Turkey’s Turkey’s #1 High Quality Lumpy Fertilizer Sized Coal Chrome Ore #3 Trader #2 Importer Exporter Turkey’s PORT MANAGEMENT ENERGY High Quality Turkey’s Turkey’s #1 State-of-the-Art HC FeCr PRODUCER Environmentally Container Terminal #1 Friendly Operator #8 World’s Power Producer & #2 High Quality World’s Investor (3GW) HC Fecr PRODUCER International By 2025 #12 Container Terminal Operator World’s International #4 Top Chromium Player #10 Port Operator
    [Show full text]
  • ASTRO SPACE STAMP ORBIT Voshkod 1: the Most Absurd Adventure in Space Ever
    1 1 7 p GIBRALTAR Blühe beginning God a«c ASTRO SPACE STAMP ORBIT Voshkod 1: The most absurd adventure in space ever. Upon learning the news that the Americans at the end of 1963 had announced the launch of the Gemini project with two astronauts, Soviet Premier Khrushchev summons Korolyov and orders him to fly not two but three cosmonauts before November 7, the anniversary of the October Revolution: "If the Americans have a vehicle for two, we prove our superiority by flying three men." explains Umberto Cavallaro, Editor of our on-line sister journal (in Italy) AdAstra. Korolyov uselessly tries to explain that in a few months it is survival reserves and safety systems. impossible to prepare a new spacecraft and a new rocket Vostok is renamed Voskhod to simulate the construction, powerful enough. Khrushchev is not interested in these within a very short time, of a brand new spaceship, about implementation details. which it is absolutely forbidden to disseminate any information or drawing. What is important is the spectacular side: "to launch into space three Soviet citizens before the Americans can launch It becomes immediately clear that even by choosing the their two astronauts." The threat is clear: if Korolyov is smallest of cosmonauts, it is impossible to compress three unable to fulfill the "task entrusted to him by the party and people within the Voskhod. the government" the task will be passed to another person in position to do so. Once again the shadow of Chelomei lingers Konstantin Feoktistov, the chief engineer of the department around.
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSIC FAST FERRIES Is Being Published As Two Separate Editions, Numbered 7 and 8
    C L A S S I C O C T O F A S T B E R 2 0 3 F E R R I E S Models, Models, Models First Westamaran revisited C L A S I F T E R C L A S S I C F A S T O C T O B E R 2 0 0 3 THE ONLY PERIODICAL ABOUT THE HEYDAY OF PASSENGER HYDROFOILS, HOVERCRAFT & CATAMARANS – AS WELL F E R R I E S AS RELEVANT NEWS n ISSUED IN PDF FORMAT. PLEASE CHECK OUR SITE ON THE WEB FOR NEXT ISSUE DETAILS: WWW.CLASSICFASTFERRIES.COM EDITOR/PUBLISHER: TIM TIMOLEON . ALL ARTICLES, ARTWORK & DESIGNS BY THE EDITOR, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED n SUBMITTALS OF MANUSCRIPTS AND PHOTOS, OLD AND NEW, AND RELEVANT NEWS ITEMS ARE ENCOURAGED! n EMAIL TO: CFF @ EMAIL.DK COPYRIGHT 2000/2003 C L A S S I C F A S T F E R R I E S COVER PHOTO : VOSKHOD PELEE FLYER 1 ABOUT TO TAKE OFF AT KINGSVILLE, ONTARIO, CANADA EARLIER THIS SUMMER. READ MORE ON PAGE 3 [JAN VAN DER DOE PHOTO] Voskhod La Alta Rapido in the old Fast Flying Ferries colors on a drizzly October day last year. The hydrofoil has since been sold and shipped to a company in Malaysia [ PIETER INPIJN photo ] Connexxion FFF sells Voskhod in Malaysia Dutch hydrofoil operator Connexxion Fast the Malaysian buyers at the end of Flying Ferries has sold one of its old August, La Alta Rapido was sitting in the Voskhod-2s, La Alta Rapido, to a company Metz shipyard at Urk receiving an in Malaysia which has renamed it Danga overhaul.
    [Show full text]
  • Yildirim Group of Companies
    YILDIRIM GROUP OF COMPANIES ANNUAL REPORT "shaping the future" 2019 ANNUAL REPORT "shaping the future" YILDIRIM GROUP OF COMPANIES 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 1 The name of the game was sustainability up until now but the rules of the game has changed to survivability.Only the strongest will endure in the next decade. Robert Yüksel Yıldırım YILDIRIM GROUP OF COMPANIES 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 3 CONTENTS GROUP OVERVIEW ................................................................................................ 6 46 CHAIRMAN'S MESSAGE ....................................................................................... 18 PRESIDENT AND CEO'S MESSAGE ................................................................. 20 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S MESSAGE ........................................................22 CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER'S MESSAGE ...................................................24 CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S MESSAGE ...........................................26 ECONOMIC REVIEW ............................................................................................28 YILMADEN HOLDING...........................................................................................30 COAL AND COKE ..................................................................................................48 SODA ASH AND DERIVATIVES ..........................................................................54 YILPORT HOLDING ..............................................................................................58 YILFERT HOLDING ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EBRD Mining Finance in Turkey – Tumad Case Study
    EBRD mining finance in Turkey – Tumad case study Turkish-Swedish Mining for Generations 18 February 2021 Content 1. EBRD at a glance 2. Natural Resources/Mining finance 3. Case Study – Tumad Gold, Turkey 2 EBRD Introduction An international financial institution supporting the development of sustainable well-functioning market economies 1991 Established 1992 Russia and 11 other members of Shareholding structure the former Soviet Union join UK 2007 The Czech Republic becomes the 8.6% first country to “graduate” from the Japan EBRD 8.6% 2012 Starts investing in Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia 1 2016 25th anniversary; US… EU 27 Countries China becomes 67th member 54.4% 2017 Lebanon became a country of operation and the Bank also Others commenced operations in West 10.1% Bank and Gaza EBRD 2018 India and San Marino become region excluding members EU 8.2% 2019 Libya becomes a member 1. Includes European Community and European Investment Bank (EIB) each at 3%. Among other EU countries: France, Germany and Italy each hold 8.6% 3 EBRD Largest investor in the region Since 1991, EBRD invested over €147 EBRD Top 10 investee countries in 2020 (€m) billion in more than 5,984 projects Highest credit rating 1 Turkey 1,675 14 160 (AAA/Aaa) 2 Egypt 1,046 140 12 Net Cumulative Bank €30 billion 3 Ukraine 812 120 10 capital base 0.4 Investment 4 Greece 797 0.7 0.4 0.2 100 1.3 0.8 8 0.9 1.2 Private sector 80 accounted for share of 5 Poland 789 6 79% 60 6 Morocco 742 9.2 8.2 8.5 8.5 4 7.5 7.7 7.9 Debt 6.9 40 84% 7 Serbia 679 2 20 Equity 8 Georgia 618 AnnualBusinessInvestment(ABI)
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Kazakhstan in 2013
    2013 Minerals Yearbook KAZAKHSTAN U.S. Department of the Interior December 2016 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF KAZAKHSTAN By Elena Safirova Kazakhstan produced a diverse range of mineral commodities measure would encourage investment in Kazakhstan’s mining and was the world’s leading producer of uranium (38% of and petroleum industries, especially in the remote areas of world output); the second-ranked producer of chromite (13% of the country. The Ministry of Industry and New Technologies world output); the fourth-ranked producer of titanium sponge (MINT) was also discussing the possibility of offering (6% of world output) and magnesium metal (3% of world companies mining licenses without going through the standard output); and the fifth-ranked producer of rhenium (5% of world competition procedures in exchange for companies agreeing output). The country was also a significant producer of barite, to make large investments in the mining projects. The MINT bauxite, cadmium, copper, gallium, sulfur, and zinc. The mineral also noted that, despite its rich mineral resources, Kazakhstan industry accounted for a significant share of the country’s gross attracted less than 1% of world investment in metallic deposits. domestic product (GDP) and export revenue; petroleum and The Ministry expected that legislation supporting the expedited natural gas were the leading commodities in terms of production procedures for issuing mining licenses could be written and value. Kazakhstan’s Government promoted the development adopted in 2013 (Mineral.ru, 2012; MinerJob.ru, 2013e). of the mineral industry and owned interests in a number of In September, the President suggested simplifying the system significant mineral-commodity-producing companies (Apodaca, of issuing exploration licenses and precluding speculative 2015; Bedinger, 2015; Bray, 2015a, b; Brininstool, 2015; resale of the mineral deposits.
    [Show full text]