DOCSLIB.ORG

Fleet Rules Homeworld Systems Ships Follow All of the Rules Found in the Battlefleet Gothic Core Rulebook, Except for Where Specified Below

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fleet Rules Homeworld Systems Ships Follow All of the Rules Found in the Battlefleet Gothic Core Rulebook, Except for Where Specified Below Fleet Rules Homeworld Systems ships follow all of the rules found in the Battlefleet Gothic core rulebook, except for where specified below: Minimal Crew Homeworld Systems ships have little in the way of crew, as the majority of their ships are automated and AI-driven. Combined with a lack of training, this makes their crew distinctly incapable of taking the fight to the enemy in-person. Unless otherwise specified, Homeworld Ships may never perform Boarding Actions, nor Hit and Run actions. They may still defend against such actions, if applicable. Crippled Status Homeworld ships rely heavily on automation and redundant systems, causing them to continue fighting at a higher level than one would expect, even as they sustain crippling damage. Homeworld ships, when reduced to 50% of their starting Hit Points, suffer the following effects: -Speed reduced by 5cm -Mass Driver battery strength reduced by 25% -Ion Beams are not effected by crippling Otherwise, their ships are unaffected by Crippled Status. Wide-Band Sensors Ships of the Homeworld Systems mount numerous banks of extremely advanced sensor systems, a holdover from their days of wandering the galaxy, looking for a home. These sensors are extremely adept at picking out the smallest fluctuation in space, and greatly assist the ship in both maneuvering and combat. This has proven extremely useful when dealing with the profusion of astrological phenomena, and the more slippery opponents like the Eldar. These have the following benefits: -All Homeworld ships apply a -1 modifier to any roll on either the Eldar Holofield or Dark Eldar Shadowfield chart, when rolling to see if their weapons have struck the target. This includes Mass Drivers, Ion Beams and Guided Missile Systems. -Homeworld Ships without shields do not suffer damage when moving through Blast Markers, and can make a leadership check to avoid damage from Gas Clouds. Escorts and Frigates may reroll that check. Mass Drivers The denizens of the Homeworld Systems use Mass Drivers as their primary kinetic weapon. Utilizing super conductive layered cylinders of heavy elements, they generate a powerful electromagnetic field to accelerate projectiles to an incredibly rapid speed. While the projectile itself is small compared to the types of weapons used by their enemies, the speed with which they impact their target is more than sufficient to cause severe damage. This speed, and the generally superior targeting systems available to the denizens of Homeworld space, makes hitting any target in range a relatively simple function. In Battlefleet Gothic, Mass Drivers function as Weapons Batteries, with the following exception: -Mass Drivers never use the gunnery chart – the dice listed on the weapons profile are the dice rolled against the target, regardless of range. Determine the to-hit number based upon the target’s armor value as normal, but do not modify the number of dice used based upon range, column shifts, firing through blast markers, etc. -Mass Drivers are treated as Lances when used against Eldar Holofields and Dark Eldar Shadowfields, modified by the ‘Wide-Band Sensors” rule above. -Critical Hits: Mass Drivers require two 6’s to be rolled per one roll on the critical hit chart. For example, a Skaal-Tel rolls 6 dice and scores 4 hits. Checking for critical damage, the player rolls those 4 dice, and two of them are 6’s. Therefore, only one roll is made on the critical hit chart, instead of the usual two. This is to represent the small- caliber nature of the rounds being fired. Ion Beam Weaponry Through the use of an accelerated particle beam, Ion weapons can bore through even the toughest capital ship armor. Requiring large amounts of power and space aboard a vessel to function, these weapons are limited to only a limited selection of ships. An Ion beam can be maintained for far longer, and over a greater distance, than the average Lance weapon utilized by other races, at the cost of striking power. In Battlefleet Gothic, Ion Beams function as lances in all respects, except for the rules for Crippling as listed above. Fleet Defense Batteries Fleet Defense Batteries are a combination of Mass Driver and Fleet Defense Turret. The Fleet Defense Battery may be fired in the shooting phase as a standard Mass Driver battery OR used in the Ordnance phase to support a friendly ship within 15cm in their Defensive Fire against enemy Torpedoes or Attack Craft. If the weapon fires in the shooting phase, it MAY NOT be used in the Ordnance phase for Defensive Fire purposes. If used in the Ordnance phase, it contributes +3 to the turret count of the target friendly vessel. Otherwise Fleet Defense Batteries follow the same rules for standard Mass Driver weapons. Ordnance The Homeworld Systems fleets places an extremely high level of importance on the production and use of Strike Craft, to the point of basing fleet doctrine around their application. This belief, coupled with the fact that the majority of their carrier craft have their own manufacturing facilities, means that an enemy will often times find himself inundated with hostile fighters, bombers, and corvettes to the point of absurdity. Launch Bays and Strike Craft -Homeworld Systems ships with launch bays never needs to issue the Reload Ordnance special order – it is considered to pass automatically. -Homeworld System launch bays come equipped automatically with Light and Heavy corvettes (excluding the Somtaaw, they have their own craft). Their rules are as follows: -Light Corvettes: Light Corvettes are not as nimble as the fighter craft of other races, but their omni-directional weaponry and intrinsic toughness sustain them well over extended combat. When Light Corvettes remove another Ordnance marker by contacting it, roll a dice. On a roll of 4, 5 or 6 do not remove the Light Corvettes, they remain in play. Note: a Light Corvette can only remove one enemy marker per Ordnance phase. Against Ordnance with this same ability, it is possible that neither marker will end up being removed. If this happens, either marker is free to move away next turn, or may stay in place and attempt to remove the enemy marker again. -Heavy Corvettes: Heavy Corvettes carry a pair of large Mass Drivers that would not be out of place on an Escort-Class warship, packing a serious punch against anything they target. When a Heavy Corvette squadron makes an attack against a warship, each squadron that survives defensive turret fire inflicts 3D3 attacks minus the turret count of the enemy vessel. -Any Homeworld Systems (Somtaaw excluded) ship with Launch bays may purchase additional types of Corvettes to launch, at the points cost listed below. These do not replace the existing Light and Heavy Corvettes, but instead add another option to launch. -Repair Corvettes, Speed 20cm, +15pts per launch bay: A squadron of Repair Corvettes provides +1d6 to the End Phase critical damage repair rolls for any ship whose base it contacts. This bonus is cumulative among multiple squadrons, but each squadron can only affect one ship per turn. The squadron is removed once their repair roll bonus is used, but may be launched again next turn as normal. -Minelayer Corvettes, Speed 25cm, +20pts per launch bay: At the beginning of your Ordnance phase, you may replace a Minelayer Corvette squadron with an Orbital Mine token. Mines move 10cm per ordnance phase directly toward the nearest enemy ship, and roll 4D6 against any enemy ship that it contacts. Minelayer Corvettes removed in this manner may be launched again next turn. Guided Missile Weapons Used only on a few vessels, Guided Missile Weapons are nonetheless a critical part of Homeworld fleet doctrines. Equally viable against capital ships and escort squadrons thanks to its cluster munitions, few fleets leave their home port without a dedicated missile ship in tow – their ability to manufacture their own munitions makes them excellent for long campaigns in dangerous territory. In Battlefleet Gothic, Guided Missile Weapons require a number of special rules: -A Homeworld ship with Guided Missile Bays never needs to issue the Reload Ordnance special order – it is considered to pass automatically. -A Homeworld ship with Guided Missile Bays can launch a spread of missiles, using torpedo tokens, equal to the strength of each Missile Bay every turn. Missile spreads move 35cm per Ordnance Phase and are allowed to make one 45 degree turn at any point in their movement, but only once per phase. However, due to the short burn time of the missile’s notably smaller engines, roll a dice after each spread of Guided Missiles has moved or attacked – on a roll of 6, the spread has exhausted its fuel and is removed from play. -Missile Spreads DO NOT ignore shields, unlike torpedoes, but are still subject to defensive fire. -Unless mentioned above, Missile Spreads follow the same rules as torpedoes in all other regards. Escorts and Frigates (Whole section needs to be re-written, because I can’t write worth a shit) The ships of the Homeworld systems are, compared to their enemies, of a vastly different scale – what the Taiidan consider their most powerful vessel, the Qwaar-Jet Heavy Cruiser, is barely up to the standards of a traditional Battlecruiser to the rest of the galaxy. The reason for this is simple – until coming into contact with the other races of the galaxy, they simply had no need for vast, kilometer’s long ships. Nowhere is this failing more evident than in their Frigate-class vessels. Considered a mainstay of almost every fleet in the Homeworld Systems, frigates are the most numerous class of vessel produced by the various factions in that sector of space. However the basic line frigate of, for example, the Taiidan Empire is roughly half the size of the smallest escort available to the Imperium, the Cobra Destroyer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternative Naval Force Structure
    Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills Unmanned­Centric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org
    [Show full text]
  • The Taiidan Empire Fleet Rules
    1 The Taiidan Empire Fleet Rules Homeworld Systems ships follow all of the rules found in the Battlefleet Gothic core rulebook, except for where specified below: Minimal Crew Homeworld Systems ships have little in the way of crew, as the majority of their ships are automated and AI-driven. Combined with a lack of training, this makes their crew distinctly incapable of taking the fight to the enemy in-person. -Unless otherwise specified, Homeworld Ships may never perform Boarding Actions, nor Hit and Run actions. They may still defend against such actions, if applicable. Crippled Status Homeworld ships rely heavily on automation and redundant systems, causing them to continue fighting at a higher level than one would expect, even as they sustain crippling damage. Homeworld ships, when reduced to 50% of their starting Hit Points, suffer the following effects: -Speed reduced by 5cm -Mass Driver battery strength reduced by 25% -Ion Beams are not effected by crippling Otherwise, their ships are unaffected by Crippled Status. Wide-Band Sensors Ships of the Homeworld Systems mount numerous banks of extremely advanced sensor systems, a holdover from their days of wandering the galaxy, looking for a home. These sensors are extremely adept at picking out the smallest fluctuation in space, and greatly assist the ship in both maneuvering and combat. This has proven extremely useful when dealing with the profusion of astrological phenomena, and the more slippery opponents like the Eldar. These have the following benefits: -All Homeworld ships apply a -1 modifier to any roll on either the Eldar Holofield or Dark Eldar Shadowfield chart, when rolling to see if their weapons have struck the target.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battlefleet Gothic Additional Ships Compendium the Battlefleet
    THE BATTLEFLEET GOTHIC ADDITIONAL SHIPS COMPENDIUM - 1 The Battlefleet Gothic Additional Ships Compendium Additional rules published in White Dwarf, BFG Magazine and other Black Library books. Compiled by Thibault JABOULEY Imperial Ramilies Class Star Fort 875 pts.............................................................................3 Imperial Apocalypse Class Battleship 375 pts ......................................................................7 Imperial Invincible Class Fast Battleship 290 pts..................................................................8 Imperial Nemesis Class Fleet Carrier 400 pts.......................................................................9 Imperial Oberon Class Battleship 335 pts...........................................................................10 Imperial Vanquisher Class Battleship 340 pts.....................................................................11 Imperial Victory Class Battleship 360 pts............................................................................12 Imperial Avenger Class Grand Cruiser 220 pts...................................................................13 Imperial Exorcist Class Grand Cruiser 230 pts ...................................................................14 Imperial / Chaos Furious Class Grand Cruiser 265 pts......................................................15 Imperial / Chaos Vengeance Class Grand Cruiser 230 pts................................................17 Imperial Armaggedon Class Battlecruiser 235 pts ..............................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • The London of TUESDAY, the Zgth of JULY, 1947 by Finfyotity Registered As a Newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE of MATAPAN
    (ftumb. 38031 3591 THIRD SUPPLEMENT TO The London Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. 4. The disposition originally ordered left the The following Despatch was submitted to the cruisers without support. The battlefleet could Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty on the if necessary have put to sea, but very nth November, 1941, by Admiral Sir inadequately screened. Further consideration Andrew B. Cunningham, G.C.B., D.S.O., led to the retention of sufficient destroyers to Commander-in-Chief, Mediterranean Station. screen the battlefieet. The moment was a lucky one when more destroyers than usual Mediterranean, were at Alexandria having just returned from ntffe November,. 1941. or just awaiting escort duty. Be pleased to lay before Their Lordships the 5. It had already been decided to take the attached reports of the Battle of Matapan, 27th- battlefleet to sea under cover of night on the 30th March, 1941. Five ships of the enemy evening of the 27th, when air reconnaissance fleet were sunk, burned or destroyed as per from Malta reported enemy cruisers steaming margin.* Except for the loss of one aircraft eastward p.m./27th. The battlefleet accordingly in action, our fleet suffered no damage or proceeded with all possible secrecy. It was casualties. well that it did so, for the forenoon of the 28th 2. The events and information prior to the found the enemy south of Gavdo and the Vice- action, on which my appreciation was based, Admiral, Light Forces (Vice-Admiral H.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Is the Order of Battle for the Commonwealth, Known in Shorthand As an ORBAT
    This document is the Order of Battle for the Commonwealth, known in shorthand as an ORBAT. Once you have agreed the points limit for your Encounter, each player must consult the ORBAT for their chosen Faction. This ORBAT allows a player to create a Force for the Commonwealth in games of Dystopian Wars. We have also made Unit cards available too, for quick reference in games. Important: For the avoidance of doubt, the rules presented in the latest version of the ORBAT always take precedence over any Unit or Battlefleet rules presented elsewhere. Each Commonwealth Force must include one or more Battlefleets. A Battlefleet is a group of Units that are always led by a Flagship. There are a number of Battlefleets available to the Commonwealth each with an array of Units to choose from and some even with additional rules or benefits. Based on the work of the infamous Troika, the Commonwealth uses electromagnetic force to launch hyper velocity projectiles. Because of these efforts, the Commonwealth Forces have the following Quality on some weapons: RAIL: The Citadel of the Initial Target receives a -2 against Attacks with this Quality. When making an attack against Aerial Units with this Quality, the Attack Dice Pool gains receives +1 Action Dice. When making an attack against Submerged Units with this Quality the Attack Dice Pool gains receives -1 Action Dice. Some Units in the Commonwealth have special rules that are different to those found in the rulebook. Units that have one or more of these rules will have them detailed in their Unit profiles in this ORBAT.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Navy Fleet Problems and the Development of Carrier
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M Repository UNITED STATES NAVY FLEET PROBLEMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARRIER AVIATION, 1929-1933 A Thesis by RYAN DAVID WADLE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2005 Major Subject: History UNITED STATES NAVY FLEET PROBLEMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARRIER AVIATION, 1929-1933 A Thesis by RYAN DAVID WADLE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, James Bradford Committee Members, R.J.Q. Adams James Olson Head of Department, Walter Buenger August 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT United States Navy Fleet Problems and the Development of Carrier Aviation, 1929-1933. (August 2005) Ryan David Wadle, B. A., Iowa State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. James Bradford The U.S. Navy first took official notice of aviation in 1910, but its development of carrier aviation lagged behind Great Britain’s until the 1920s. The first American aircraft carrier, the Langley, commissioned in 1919, provided the Navy with a valuable platform to explore the potential uses of carrier aviation, but was usually limited to scouting and fleet air defense in the U.S. Navy’s annual interwar exercises called fleet problems. This began to change in 1929 with the introduction of the carriers Lexington and Saratoga in Fleet Problem IX.
    [Show full text]
  • The Combat Utility of the U.S. Fleet Aircraft Carrier in the Post-War Period1
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 16, ISSUE 4 (2016) Studies The combat utility of the U.S. fleet aircraft carrier in the post-war period1 Ben Ho Wan Beng2 Introduction The fleet aircraft carrier possesses a number of attributes that make it the United States National Command Authorities’ platform of choice to deal with a crisis or war. These attributes are namely, territorial independence, mobility that allows it to deploy as a “first-responder” to a troubled spot, and flexibility provided by the vessel’s air wing that allows it to handle different and evolving scenarios. Nevertheless, it must be noted that the relatively successful and unencumbered application of American sea-based airpower in the post-war period has been significantly aided by the benign environments in which the carriers have operated. To illustrate, during Operations Desert Storm and Enduring Freedom, U.S. carriers came up against adversaries with few or no anti- access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities such as submarines and missiles. In other words, 1 This paper is adapted from the author’s master’s degree in strategic studies dissertation on a similar topic at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore. 2 Senior Analyst, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2016 ISSN : 1488-559X JOURNAL OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES American carriers have so far only proven their worth in situations located on the lower end of the combat spectrum. Indeed, they last met an opponent of a substantial standing – the Japanese navy – in 1944, and questions abound over their ability to do so credibly should the opportunity presents itself in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Alliance-ORBAT.Pdf
    This document is the Order of Battle for the Alliance, known in shorthand as an ORBAT. Once you have agreed the points limit for your Encounter, each player must consult the ORBAT for their chosen Faction. This ORBAT allows a player to create a Force for the Alliance in games of Dystopian Wars. We have also made Unit cards available too, for quick reference in games. Important: For the avoidance of doubt, the rules presented in the latest version of the ORBAT always take precedence over any Unit or Battlefleet rules presented elsewhere. Each Alliance Force must include one or more Battlefleets. A Battlefleet is a group of Units that are always led by a Flagship. There are a number of Battlefleets available to the Alliance each with an array of units to choose from and some even with additional rules or benefits. Some Units in the Alliance have special rules that are different to those found in the rulebook. Units that have one or more of these rules will have them detailed in their Unit profiles in this ORBAT. The rules unique to the Alliance are listed here: COORDINATED SUPPORT: This Model may add +3 to its Aerial and Submerged Defences if it is within 10” of one or more friendly Units with the Flagship trait. DEFENSIVE PILOTS: Friendly SRS Tokens provide +2 ADV and +2 Action Dice to the Defending the Citadel Dice Pool of this Unit rather than the usual +1. REINFORCED WATERLINE: Attacks with the Submerged Quality gain a single Hit from a Heavy Hit result rather than the usual two when attacking this Model.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany and the U-Boat: How Naval Ineptitude and Politicking Crushed the Hope of Its Greatest Weapon
    GERMANY AND THE U-BOAT: HOW NAVAL INEPTITUDE AND POLITICKING CRUSHED THE HOPE OF ITS GREATEST WEAPON Michael Scafide History 489 April 2009 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin Eau Claire with the consent of the author. Table of Contents ABSTRACT 3 INTRODUCTION 4 The Dreadnought Race 5 The Development of the U-Boat 14 The First Test of the U-Boat 19 The U-Boat Terror 23 The Lusitania Incident 32 One Missed Opportunity After Another 37 Trying to Break the Camel's Back 43 Conclusion 49 APPENDIX A 50 APPENDIX B 51 WORKS CITED 55 WORKS CONSULTED 56 2 Abstract Germany entered World War One engaged in a heated naval race with Great Britain. The introduction of the Dreadnought by Great Britain in 1906 made Germany focus almost completely on the creation of a battleship fleet, instead of her fledgling U- Boat program. This paper follows the course of the dreadnought race, the early advancement of the U-Boat, the history of Handelskrieg, and three situations in which Germany was poised to harm either the British battle fleet or take the island nation completely out of the war with the destruction of its mercantile shipping. This paper looks at the important events of the U-Boat campaigns against Great Britain during World War One and analyzes just how close Germany came to victory on numerous occasions, relying solely on the U-boat. 3 Introduction Germany spent the decade leading up to World War One in a heated naval race with Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • USS Midway Museum Library Online Catalog 01/01/2020
    USS Midway Museum Library Online Catalog 01/01/2020 Author Title Pub Date Object Name Stevenson, James P. $5 Billion Misunderstanding, The : The Collapse of the Navy's A-12 Stealth Bomber 2001 Book Program Ross, Donald K. 0755 : The Heroes of Pearl Harbor 1988 Paperback Winkowski, Fredric 100 Planes, 100 Years : The First Century of Aviation 1998 Book Shores, Christopher 100 Years of British Naval Aviation 2009 Book Myers, Donald E. 101 Sea Stories : Those Tales Marines, Sailors and Others Love to Tell 2005 Paperback Bishop, Chris (ed) 1400 Days : The Civil War Day by Day 1990 Book Daughan, George C. 1812 : The Navy's War 2011 Book Werstein, Irving 1914-1918 : World War I Told with Pictures 1964 Paperback Hydrographic Office, Secretary of Navy 1931 International Code of Signals (American Edition), Vol. I - Visual 1952 Book Hydrographic Office, Secretary of Navy 1931 International Code of Signals (American Edition), Vol. II - Radio 1952 Book United States Naval Academy 1937 : The Sixty-Three Year Fix 2000 Paperback Kershaw, Andrew (ed) 1939-1945 War Planes 1973 Paperback Groom, Winston 1942 : The Year That Tried Men's Souls 2005 Book Naval Air Systems Command 2.75 Inch Airborne Rocket Launchers 1996 Manual Naval Air Systems Command 20-MM Aircraft Gun MK12 Mod 4 1980 Manual Naval Air Systems Command 20-MM Barrel Erosion Gage Kit M10(T23) 1976 Manual Merry, John A. 200 Best Aviation Web Sites 1998 Book Robinson, C. Snelling (Charles Snelling) 200,000 Miles Aboard the Destroyer Cotten 2000 Book Powell, Dick 20th Century Fox Studio Classics : 75 years, Disc 1 : On the Avenue 2006 DVD Grable, Betty 20th Century Fox Studio Classics : 75 years, Disc 2 : Pin Up Girl 2005 DVD Miranda, Carmen 20th Century Fox Studio Classics : 75 years, Disc 3 : Something for the Boys 2008 DVD Cooper, Gary 20th Century Fox Studio Classics : 75 years, Disc 4 : You're in the Navy Now 2006 DVD Murdock.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Navy and the Dreadnought Revolution
    ..... 1...._.~111~1111111 THE UNITED STATES NAVY AND THE DREADNOUGHT REVOLUTION: AN HISTORICAL CRITIQUE OF THE CAPITAL SHIP THEORY OF SEAPOWER By JEFFREY MICHAEL McKEAGE \\ Bachelor of Arts University of Southern Maine Portland, Maine 1980 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of f'1ASTER OF ARTS May, 1987 ~----- ,v·~~.Ji 0 MA s,._ fa+:- ~/. UNIVERSITY «' LIBRARY THE UNITED STATES NAVY AND THE REVOLUTION: AN HISTORICAL CRITIQUE OF THE CAPITAL SHIP THEORY OF SEAPOWER Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College ii 127~689 PREFACE In the winter of 1889-90, Secretary of the Navy Benjamin Franklin Tracy altered the basic naval strategy of the United States, a change unique in American history. Since the Revolutionary War the Navy had been devoted to protecting the coasts and raiding ene.rny co.rn.rnerce, although the emphasis of this policy had varied. In the ·1aaos a group of young naval officers, who advocated a fleet in the style of the European powers, advanced to co.rn.rnand ranks. Two of their leaders, Admiral Stephen B. Luce and Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan, convinced Tracy to begin the con­ struction of a squadron of American capital ships, a course last seriously contemplated during the War of ·15·12. ·1 Since that winter, the capital ship has evolved fro.rn battleships and armored cruisers to nuclear aircraft carriers and ballistic .missile submarines, but American naval policy has remained firmly centered on the battlefleet. The complete victory of Tracy's battleships at the Battle of Santiago apparently vindicated this new policy, but only seven years later, the Navy's unwavering adherence to the capital ship strategy caused it to become increas­ ingly impotent as a consideration in international strat- egy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Nemesis – the Complilation of the Best Battlefleet Gothic Rules We Have Published on the Cypra Probatii Portal
    Imperial patrol fleet [photo by RIP] Schismatic class light cruiser in Steffenrith's Nebula (Segmentum Pacificus) [photo by MKG] EDITOR'S NOTE After a few months of hard team-work, I can proudly present the Book of Nemesis – the complilation of the best Battlefleet Gothic rules we have published on the Cypra Probatii portal. Most of them were extensively playtested during a few events and uncounted number of home games. The idea of this publication was born at the 'Charkov System' event in July 2007. We created and accepted at our events such a number of additional rules that I realised that they should be compiled in one place to avoid confusion. The Nemesis sector itself was invented in the Spring of 2006, when I was preparing the for first BFG event in Poland - 'War in Nemesis Sector'. In the next year, piece by piece, I created its history, starting from loose beer discussions to methodical work, and soon this region of the WH40k universe gained its final shape. Although we tried to make The Book as balanced as possible, remember that the rules presented here are unofficial and you should consult your oppontent or event organiser to check that you can use them. I would like to thank to all Book's co-authors for their fine job, to Iain 'Cybershadow' Werry for proof reading, and to Andy Hall for giving me the motivation and allowing me to use GW owned graphics. And finally, last but not least, one technical note: the Book of Nemesis is designed for 2- page printing.
    [Show full text]