Ekalaka Germplasm Bur Oak Selected Class Pre-Varietal Release

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ekalaka Germplasm Bur Oak Selected Class Pre-Varietal Release • .., NOTICE OF RELEASE OF EKALAKA GERMPLASM BUR OAK SELECTED CLASS PRE-VARIETAL RELEASE Joseph D Scianna and James S Jacobs A Selected Class pre-varietal release of bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa Michx. [Fagaceae]) designated as Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak has been released for use in the Northern Great Plains and Intermountain West for windbreaks, shelter- belts, riparian forest buffers, wildlife habitat plantings, Xeriscapes®, and other conservation plantings. This selection is a bulk of 9 indigenous seed sources from Montana, North Ekalaka Gerrnplasrn bui oak orchard tree. .. .. Dakota, and South Dakota selected for superior percentage survival, rate of height growth, and vigor rating compared with other seed sources tested at Bridger, Montana. Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak can be used in many conservation appli- cations in place of Russian-olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L. [Elaeagnaceae]) and green ash (Fraxinuspennsylvanica Marsh. [Oleaceae}) given adequate soil aeration and low salinity. Scianna ID, Jacobs IS. 2010. Notice of release of Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak selected class pre-varietal release. Native Plants journal 11(1):77-78, 80-82. KEY WORDS Quercus macrocarpa, Fagaceae NOMENCLATURE USDA NRCS (2009) COLLABORATORS USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Bridger Plant Materials Center, Bridger, Montana; Montana Agricultural Experiment Stations, Montana State University, Bozeman; Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Stations, and the Universi- ty of Wyoming, Laramie. 77 NATIVEPLANTS 1 11 1 1 1 SPRING 2010 -- Species I Quercus macrocarpa Michx. Common Name I bur oak .I Plant Symbol I QUMA2 - Accession Number I 9087712 Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak (Quercus originates from a bulk of several Great attributes including strong branches, macrocarpa Michx. [Fagaceae]), a Plains seed sources, it should prove drought tolerance, winter hardiness, Selected Class pre-varietal release, is well adapted to the conditions in the and freedom from serious insect or dis- now available for use in the Northern intended geographic area of use. ease problems. Great Plains and Intermountain valleys Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak was Bur oak is capable of growing over a of Montana and Wyoming for numer- selected for superior seedling survival, wide range of soil conditions. It is ous woody plant conservation prac- rate of height growth, and vigor rating, found growing well on rocky hillsides, tices. As a Selected Class release, this relative to other bur oak individual limestone soils, droughty soils, clayey selection will be referred to as Ekalaka trees and seed sources tested. Ekalaka sites, and other marginal locations given Gerrnplasm bur oak, USDA Natural Germplasm bur oak can also be used in full sun conditions. Bur oak is intoler- Resources Conservation Service other conservation applications such as ant of flooding and prolonged soil satu- (NRCS) accession number 9087732. reforestation, Xeriscapingn, and woody ration. A combination of high water use draw restoration. efficiency and a fast-growing tap root enable this species to withstand the dry, JUSTIFICATION COLLECTION SITE windy conditions characteristic of the INFORMATION northern plains. Most references list bur Justification for alternative release is oak as hardy to USDA Winter Hardiness based on an urgent need for well-adapt- The original Ekalaka Germplasm bur Zone 4, although bur oak grows well in ed plant materials for windbreaks, shel- oak seed collections were made in var- many locations in Montana in Hardi- terbelts, riparian forest buffers, and ious locations across the Great Plains ness Zone 3. wildlife plantings in the Great Plains and (Table 1) in support of a bur oak seed On good sites, bur oak has a spread- Intermountain West. In addition, the provenance study. Wildland bur oak ing habit with a broad crown; massive emergence of the emerald ash borer seed collections were made in 1991 and bole; and low, large branches. In Mon- (Agrilus planipennis) will create a press- 1992 from individual trees demon- tana and Wyoming, anticipated maxi- ing demand for medium- to tall-stature strating superior phenotypic character- mum mature height of bur oak will be deciduous trees to replace green ash istics. These characteristics included approximately 15 in (50 Et). By 10 y of (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh single, straight stems with strong apical age, Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak aver- [Oleaceae]) in numerous conservation dominance, well-formed crowns, at aged 29 cm (11 in) of annual height practices. A move toward discontinuing least 30 y of age, and the production of growth, although some individual trees the use of Russian-olive (Elaeagnus abundant crops of sound acorns. grew as much as 85 cm (33 in) per year. angustifolia L. [Elaeagnaceae]) as a con- No serious insect and disease prob- servation species, even to the point of lems have been observed on Ekalaka removing and limiting existing plantings DESCRIPTION Germplasm bur oak, although aphids and habitats iii some circumstances, will are a common nuisance pest at Bridger, create a need for well-adapted alterna- Ekalaka Germplasni bur oak maintains Montana. Oak wehworm, oak skele- tives. A lack of tested and adapted the same general botanical (floral, tonizer, leaf miner, variable oakleaf germplasm and the potential use of non- foliage, fruit, and seed) attributes as the caterpillar, oak lacebug, and June beetles adapted seed sources further support species. It is a medium- to tall-stature are listed as pests of bur oak. 78 Selected Class release. Given this release deciduous tree with several desirable NATIVEPLANTS 1 11 1 1 1 SPRING 2010 EKALAKA GERMPLAS M TABLE 1 Bur oak seed source origin, Bridger Plant Material Center, Bridger, Montana. Initial NRCS Number of Number of trees selected for Accession number County of origin State trees tested Ekalaka Germplasm 9076042 McKenzie North Dakota 12 0 9076043 Griggs North Dakota 16 0 / 9076044 Burleigh North Dakota 15 6 9076045 Pennington South Dakota 14 5 9076046 Bottineau North Dakota 15 0 9076047 Oliver North Dakota 16 0 9076048 Dunn North Dakota 14 0 9076049 Carter Montana 16 0 9076050 Emmons North Dakota 14 7 9076051 Bottineau North Dakota 16 0 9076052 Stark North Dakota 16 0 9076053 Oliver North Dakota 16 9 9076054 McKenzie North Dakota 14 0 9076055 Burleigh North Dakota 16 11 9076056 Burleigh North Dakota 16 0 9076057 Sioux North Dakota 16 9 9076058 Morton North Dakota 16 0 9076059 Morton North Dakota 16 0 9076060 Emmons North Dakota 16 0 9076061 Carter Montana 16 6 9076062 Carter Montana 16 7 9076063 Carter Montana 16 7 9076064 Carter Montana 16 0 9076065 Carter Montana 16 0 Total: 370 67 METHOD OF SELECTION field review of each tree within a family tamed 80 and 84% survival, respectively. (seed source), and statistical analyses. In Percentage survival among selected seed Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak is released general, seed sources with mean per- sources ranged from 75 to 94%. Select- as a "Natural—Track" germplasm, that is, centage survival, height growth, and ed trees averaged 29 cm (11 in) of height it is being increased without purposeful vigor rating at or above overall popula- growth in 2003, with individual tree manipulation. This selection resulted tion means were considered. Additional- annual growth as high as 85 cm (33 in). from field testing of 24 bur oak seed ly, individual trees within a selected seed Mean annual height growth by seed sources from Montana, North Dakota, source that did not meet established source ranged from 7 cm (3 in) to 37 cm and South Dakota. All seed sources were mean criteria or that did not appear (15 in). Selected trees averaged 339 cm field tested for 10 y in a replicated dry- suitable based on the field inspection (134 in) in height in 2003, whereas non- land study at Bridger, Montana, prior to were omitted. A total of 67 trees from 9 selected and all trees measured 230 cm selection. Selection was based on a com- seed sources from 3 states (Montana, (90 in) and 253 cm (100 in), respective- bination of descriptive statistics (per- North Dakota, and South Dakota) were ly. Plant vigor rating of selected trees in centage survival, rate of height growth, selected. Selected seed sources main- 2003 averaged 2.9 ("1" is best), whereas and vigor rating at or above the overall tained 90% survival until 2003, whereas non-selected and all trees averaged 4.1 80 population mean), a visual (subjective) non-selected and all seed sources main- and 3.8, respectively. NATIVEPLANTS 1 11 1 1 1 SPRING 2010 EKALAKA GERMPLASM ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak is a long-lived deciduous tree Hartland Nursery native to Montana and Wyoming. At reproductive maturity it is Specializing in California a prolific seed producer, but is not considered weedy. Bur oak Native Plants and stands readily perpetuate themselves through seed shatter, but Low-Maintenance Ornamentals the seedlings are sensitive to grazing, flooding, and fire. The species is very tolerant of cold temperatures. Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak passes all criteria for potential weediness in the NRCS Plant Materials Program, Environmental Evaluation of Plant Materials Releases. ANTICIPATED CONSERVATION USE Ekalaka Germplasm bur oak has numerous potential conserva- Hart RestoratIon, Inc. tion applications. It can be used as a medium- to tall-stature tree Providing Practical Approaches in windbreak and shelterbelt systems. It provides food for numer- to Complex Ecological Problems ous forms of wildlife, as well as nesting, loafing, and roosting sites for many species of birds including turkeys. It
Recommended publications
  • Spiranthes Diluvialis Survey, 2004
    Spiranthes diluvialis Survey, 2004 Final ROCKY REACH HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC Project No. 2145 December 1, 2004 Prepared by: Beck Botanical Services Bellingham, WA Prepared for: Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County Wenatchee, Washington Rocky Reach Spiranthes diluvialis TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2: METHODS......................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 3: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.......................................................................... 2 3.1 Chelan Falls Population .................................................................................................................................3 3.2 Howard Flats Population................................................................................................................................4 3.3 Gallagher Flats Population .............................................................................................................................5 SECTION 4: CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 5 SECTION 5: REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 6 Spiranthes diluvialis SurveyFinal Report Rocky Reach Project No. 2145 December 1, 2004 Page i SS/8504 Rocky Reach Spiranthes diluvialis LIST OF TABLES Table 1: General comparison of
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains
    United States Department of Agriculture Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-335 November 2016 Bergdahl, Aaron D.; Hill, Alison, tech. coords. 2016. Diseases of trees in the Great Plains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-335. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 229 p. Abstract Hosts, distribution, symptoms and signs, disease cycle, and management strategies are described for 84 hardwood and 32 conifer diseases in 56 chapters. Color illustrations are provided to aid in accurate diagnosis. A glossary of technical terms and indexes to hosts and pathogens also are included. Keywords: Tree diseases, forest pathology, Great Plains, forest and tree health, windbreaks. Cover photos by: James A. Walla (top left), Laurie J. Stepanek (top right), David Leatherman (middle left), Aaron D. Bergdahl (middle right), James T. Blodgett (bottom left) and Laurie J. Stepanek (bottom right). To learn more about RMRS publications or search our online titles: www.fs.fed.us/rm/publications www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/ Background This technical report provides a guide to assist arborists, landowners, woody plant pest management specialists, foresters, and plant pathologists in the diagnosis and control of tree diseases encountered in the Great Plains. It contains 56 chapters on tree diseases prepared by 27 authors, and emphasizes disease situations as observed in the 10 states of the Great Plains: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. The need for an updated tree disease guide for the Great Plains has been recog- nized for some time and an account of the history of this publication is provided here.
    [Show full text]
  • Plantlists BMP Manual- April 30, 2008
    Appendix B Charlotte-Mecklenburg Invasive and Exotic Plant List Infests Hydrologic Form Zone(s) 1 Scientific Name Common Name Family Wetland Indicator Status Invasive Exotic Tree 5, 6 Acer platanoides Maple, Norway Aceraceae NI 3, 4, 5, 6 Ailanthus altissima Tree of heaven Simaroubaceae NI 4, 5, 6 Albizia julibrissin Mimosa; Silk tree Fabaceae NI 3, 4, 5, 6 Broussonetia papyrifera Mulberry, Paper Moraceae NI 5, 6 Melia azedarach Chinaberry Meliaceae NI 4, 5, 6 Morus alba Mulberry, White or Common Moraceae FACU- 3, 4, 5, 6 Morus papyrifera (See Broussonetia papyrifera ) Moraceae NI 4, 5, 6 Paulownia tomentosa Empress or Princess tree Scrophulariaceae FACU 4, 5, 6 Populus balsamifera ssp. balsamifera Poplar, Balsam or Balm of Gilead Salicaceae FAC 5, 6 Quercus acutissima Oak, Sawtooth Fagaceae NI Invasive Exotic Shrub 4, 5, 6 Berberis thunbergii Barberry, Japanese Berberidaceae UPL Elaeagnus angustifolia Olive, Russian Oleaceae FAC Elaeagnus pungens Olive, Thorny Oleaceae NI Elaeagnus umbellata Olive, Autumn Oleaceae NI Eleutherococcus pentaphyllus Ginseng shrub; Fiveleaf Aralia Araliaceae NI Euonymus alata Spindletree, Winged or Burning Bush Celastraceae NI Euonymus fortunei Wintercreeper or Climbing Euonymus Celastraceae NI Ligustrum obtusifolium Privet, Border or Blunt-leaved Oleaceae NI Ligustrum sinense Privet, Chinese Oleaceae FAC Ligustrum villosum (See Ligustrum sinense ) Oleaceae NI Ligustrum vulgare Privet, European or Common Oleaceae NI Lonicera x bella Honeysuckle, Whitebell or Bell's Caprifoliaceae NI Lonicera fragrantissima
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn Olive Elaeagnus Umbellata Thunberg and Russian Olive Elaeagnus Angustifolia L
    Autumn olive Elaeagnus umbellata Thunberg and Russian olive Elaeagnus angustifolia L. Oleaster Family (Elaeagnaceae) DESCRIPTION Autumn olive and Russian olive are deciduous, somewhat thorny shrubs or small trees, with smooth gray bark. Their most distinctive characteristic is the silvery scales that cover the young stems, leaves, flowers, and fruit. The two species are very similar in appearance; both are invasive, however autumn olive is more common in Pennsylvania. Height - These plants are large, twiggy, multi-stemmed shrubs that may grow to a height of 20 feet. They occasionally occur in a single-stemmed, more tree-like form. Russian olive in flower Leaves - Leaves are alternate, oval to lanceolate, with a smooth margin; they are 2–4 inches long and ¾–1½ inches wide. The leaves of autumn olive are dull green above and covered with silvery-white scales beneath. Russian olive leaves are grayish-green above and silvery-scaly beneath. Like many other non-native, invasive plants, these shrubs leaf out very early in the spring, before most native species. Flowers - The small, fragrant, light-yellow flowers are borne along the twigs after the leaves have appeared in May. autumn olive in fruit Fruit - The juicy, round, edible fruits are about ⅓–½ inch in diameter; those of Autumn olive are deep red to pink. Russian olive fruits are yellow or orange. Both are dotted with silvery scales and produced in great quantity August–October. The fruits are a rich source of lycopene. Birds and other wildlife eat them and distribute the seeds widely. autumn olive and Russian olive - page 1 of 3 Roots - The roots of Russian olive and autumn olive contain nitrogen-fixing symbionts, which enhance their ability to colonize dry, infertile soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Olive (Elaeagnus Angustifolia L.) Plant Guide
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Guide RUSSIAN OLIVE Elaeagnus angustifolia L. Plant Symbol = ELAN Common Names: Oleaster, trebizond-date Scientific Names: Synonyms are Elaeagnus angustifolia var. orientalis Description General: Russian olive is a large, thorny, perennial deciduous tree New stems and leaves of Russian olive are covered with silvery-gray or small shrub that usually grows 10 to 25 feet tall. It is a non- hairs; older stems are smooth and reddish brown; immature fruits are native, invasive species. The alternately arranged leaves are 1 to 4 silver. Photo by NRCS. inches long and 0.5 to 1.5 inches wide with smooth edges. The upper leaf surface is green-gray while the lower surface is silver. The numerous thorns are 1 to 2 inches long and arranged alternately on stems. The flowers have four yellow sepals that resemble petals. They appear bell-shaped and are arranged in clusters (USDA, NRCS, 2019). New stem growth is covered with hairs that give it a silvery-gray appearance. Stems become smooth and reddish brown with age. Mature trunks can have a circumference up to 20 inches with dark gray, ridged bark. Roots can grow to depths of 40 feet. Russian olive has clusters of 0.5 inch, hard, olive-shaped fruit that each contain one seed. Immature fruits are silver and ripen to tan or brown. Distribution: Russian olive is native to Europe and western Asia. It was introduced to the United States in the early 1900s and became widely distributed due to its extensive use as an ornamental species in drier regions of the Great Plains and Rocky Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide for Managing Russian Olive in the Southwest
    United States Department of Agriculture Field Guide for Managing Russian Olive in the Southwest Forest Southwestern Service Region TP-R3-16-24 September 2014 Cover Photos Top left: Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org Top right: J. S. Peterson, USDA-NRCS Plants Database Bottom: USDA-NRCS Plants Database The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) Oleaster family (Elaeagnaceae) Russian olive is widespread throughout the United States • Clusters of small, hard, olive-like, yellowish to red- as a tree and is listed as a noxious weed in New Mexico. brown fruits (drupes, 0.5 inch long) with a dusting of This field guide serves as the U.S. Forest Service’s silver scales; fruit matures August to October. recommendations for management of Russian olive in • Reproduces primarily by seed, although sprouting forests, woodlands, and rangelands associated with its from buds at the root crown and suckers from lateral Southwestern Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Elaeagnus Angustifolia - Russian Olive (Elaeagnaceae) ------Russian-Olive, Oleaster, Or Narrow-Leafed Oleaster Is Twigs Grown for Its Silvery Gray Foliage
    Elaeagnus angustifolia - Russian Olive (Elaeagnaceae) ------------------------------------------------------------- Russian-olive, oleaster, or narrow-leafed oleaster is Twigs grown for its silvery gray foliage. The tree prefers a -young branches thin, silvery sunny location and is tolerant of most soil types, but -stems sometimes thorny, covered in scales can be affected by various diseases. It has become a -older branches develop a shiny light brown color problem invasive plant in some areas. -buds are small, silvery-brown and rounded, covered with 4 scales FEATURES Trunk Form grayish-brown older bark -a deciduous large shrub or tree, 20' tall x 20' USAGE spread Function - over 15' tall and wide- -used as a hedge or screen, but may be an accent plant spreading in the border or entranceway because of silvery foliage -rounded habit -may be a foundation shrub -fast growth rate (12-18" -can be massed along highways or seacoasts per year) Texture Culture -fine to medium texture -very adaptable to a wide range of environmental Assets conditions; thrives in alkaline soils and in sandy flood -silvery foliage plains -adaptability and growth in poor sites -able to fix nitrogen so can grow on very poor soils Liabilities -tolerates cold, drought, salt sprays -from a landscape perspective: Canker, Verticillium -easily transplanted wilt and leaf spot destroy that silvery silhouette by -grows most vigorously in full sun killing many branches -does not do well in wet sites or -thorns may be present under dense shade -from an environmental perspective: troublesome -susceptible to foliar and stem invasive that creates heavy shade and suppresses diseases, but affected by few pests plants that require direct sunlight in areas such as -it may invade grasslands and fields, prairies, open woodlands and forest edges.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian-Olive
    Russian-olive slide 47b 360% slide 47c slide 47d 380% 360% III-93 Russian-olive Environmental Requirements (Elaeagnus Soils Soil Texture - Adapted to a wide variety of soils. angustifolia) Soil pH - 5.5 to 8.0. Tolerates alkaline and saline soils. Windbreak Suitability Group - 1, 1K, 2, 2K, 3, 4, 4C, 5, 6D, General Description 6G, 8, 9C, 9W, 9L. Small tree, sometimes referred to as a large shrub, intro- Cold Hardiness duced from Russia. Tolerates saline/alkaline soils. May USDA Zone 2. invade unmanaged bottomlands and moist pastures. Thorny. Silvery leaf color. Leaves retained very late into Water fall. The largest tree in North Dakota is 43 feet tall with Drought resistant. Does not withstand ponding. a canopy spread of 63 feet. Light Leaves and Buds Full sun. Bud Arrangement - Alternate. Bud Color - Gray-brown, rounded, oblong, with 4 silvery Uses scales. Bud Size - 1/8 inch. Conservation/Windbreaks Small tree for farmstead and field windbreaks. Seed is Leaf Type and Shape - Simple, oblong-lanceolate to linear. spread prolifically by birds and may overrun unmanaged Leaf Margins - Entire. areas, especially saline sites. Leaf Surface - Scaly. Leaf Length - 1 to 3 inches. Wildlife Excellent for wildlife, over 50 species use it for food and Leaf Width - 1/4 to 5/8 inch. cover. Leaf Color - Upper surface scaly, grayish-green; undersurface silvery-scaled. Agroforestry Products Wood - Beautiful wood for small woodwork pieces. Flowers and Fruits Flower Type - Flowers are perfect. Urban/Recreational Flower Color - Silvery or whitish outside, yellow inside, Can be used as specimen plant for its color accent, or as an fragrant.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond Fork and Sixth Water Creeks Ute Ladies
    DiamondDiamond Fork Fork and and Sixth Sixth Water Water Creeks Creeks UteUte Ladies’-tresses Ladies’-tresses FinalFinal 2008 2008 Monitoring Monitoring Report Report APRIL 2009 SUBMITTEDBY: SUBMITTED TO: BIO-WEST, Inc. Utah ReclamationMitigation and Conservation Commission 1063 West 1400 North 230 South 500 East Suite 230 Logan, Utah 84321 Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 TOC-i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1-1 1.1 Watershed Description ......................................... 1-1 1.2 History of the Colorado River Storage Project Act (CRSP), Central Utah Project (CUP), and Central Utah Project Completion Act (CUPCA)..... 1-4 1.3 Impacts to the Diamond Fork System ............................. 1-5 1.4 Vegetation Issues............................................. 1-6 1.5 Ute Ladies’-tresses along Diamond Fork Creek ..................... 1-7 1.6 Previous Studies of Ute Ladies’-tresses in the Diamond Fork Watershed .................................................. 1-8 1.7 Purpose of and Need for Monitoring.............................. 1-8 1.8 Scope of Work for Riparian Vegetation Monitoring.................. 1-9 2.0 UTE LADIES’-TRESSES SURVEYS .................................. 2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................. 2-1 2.2 Methods .................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Data Collection ........................................ 2-1 2.2.2 Habitat Known to be Occupied by Ute Ladies’-tresses .......... 2-1 2.2.3 Habitat Suitable for Ute Ladies’-tresses Occupation ............ 2-2 2.2.4 Occupied and Suitable Ute Ladies’-tresses Habitat ............. 2-2 2.3 Results..................................................... 2-2 2.3.1 Known Ute Ladies’-tresses Surfaces ........................ 2-2 2.3.2 New Ute Ladies’-tresses-Occupied Sites .................... 2-11 2.4 Discussion ................................................. 2-11 3.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION ...................................... 3-1 3.1 Ute Ladies’-tresses Surveys....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Distribution of Populus Trichocarpa on an Alluvial Flood Plain in Northwestern Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2001 Growth and distribution of Populus trichocarpa on an alluvial flood plain in northwestern Montana Mary J. Harner The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Harner, Mary J., "Growth and distribution of Populus trichocarpa on an alluvial flood plain in northwestern Montana" (2001). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 6885. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/6885 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission )( No, I do not grant permission __________ Author's Signature: Date: Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. 8/98 Growth and Distribution ofPopulus trichocarpa on an Alluvial Flood Plain in Northwestern Montana By Mary J. Hamer B.S. Tulane University, 1997 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science The University of Montana Spring, 2001 rerson >ean, Graduate School O Date UMI Number: EP37686 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist Logan Canyon
    Checklist of Woody Plants of Logan Canyon and Surrounding Mountains Mike Kuhns, USU Extension Forester, February 2005 This is an attempt to list every woody plant (tree, shrub, or vine) growing in Logan Canyon and the adjacent mountains. Plants are listed alphabetically by genus & species within families. All are native to the area unless otherwise noted. For corrections or additions e-mail Mike Kuhns at [email protected]. GYMNOSPERMS Pinaceae – Pine Family Abies concolor (white or concolor fir); T Abies lasiocarpa (subalpine fir); T Picea engelmannii (Engelmann spruce); T Picea pungens (Colorado blue spruce); T Pinus contorta var. latifolia (lodgepole pine); T Pinus edulis (pinyon); T; Rare Pinus flexilis (limber pine); T Pinus monophylla (singleleaf pinyon); T; Rare Pinus ponderosa (ponderosa pine); T Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir); T Cupressaceae – Cypress Family Juniperus communis (common juniper); S Juniperus osteosperma (Utah juniper); T Juniperus scopulorum (Rocky Mountain juniper); T ANGIOSPERMS Aceraceae – Maple Family Acer glabrum (Rocky Mountain maple); T, S Acer grandidentatum (canyon maple); T, S Acer negundo (boxelder); T †Acer platanoides (Norway maple); T Anacardiaceae – Cashew Family Rhus glabra (smooth sumac); S Rhus trilobata (aromatica) (fragrant sumac); S Toxicodendron rydbergii (western poison-ivy); S Asteraceae – Aster Family Artemisia arbuscula (low sagebrush); S Artemisia cana (silver sagebrush); S Artemisia frigida (fringed sagebrush); S Artemisia nova (black sagebrush); S Artemisia
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Olive
    FACT SHEET: RUSSIAN-OLIVE Russian-Olive Elaeagnus angustifolia L. Oleaster family (Elaeagnaceae) NATIVE RANGE Southeastern Europe and Western Asia DESCRIPTION Russian-olive is a small, usually thorny shrub or small tree that can grow to 30 feet in height. Its stems, buds, and leaves have a dense covering of silvery to rusty scales. Leaves are egg or lance-shaped, smooth margined, and alternate along the stem. At three years of age, plants begin to flower and fruit. Highly aromatic, creamy yellow flowers appear in June and July and are later replaced by clusters of abundant silvery fruits. ECOLOGICAL THREAT Russian-olive can outcompete native vegetation, interfere with natural plant succession and nutrient cycling, and tax water reserves. Because Russian- olive is capable of fixing nitrogen in its roots, it can grow on bare, mineral substrates and dominate riparian vegetation where overstory cottonwoods have died. Although Russian-olive provides a plentiful source of edible fruits for birds, ecologists have found that bird species richness is actually higher in riparian areas dominated by native vegetation. DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES Russian-olive is found primarily in the central and western U.S., as well as in the East (e.g., Virginia to Pennsylvania), where it occurs with its exotic partner, autumn-olive (Elaeagnus umbellata). In the West, Russian-olive occurs mainly in the Great Basin Desert region at 800-2000 feet elevation and is also abundant in riparian zones of the Great Plains, for example, the Platte River in Nebraska. HABITAT IN THE UNITED STATES Russian-olive is found along streams, fields and open areas.
    [Show full text]