An Ecological Assessment of Russian Olive in Western Canada: Predicted Distribution Across Its Invaded Range and Insect Associations in Southern BC

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Ecological Assessment of Russian Olive in Western Canada: Predicted Distribution Across Its Invaded Range and Insect Associations in Southern BC An ecological assessment of Russian olive in western Canada: Predicted distribution across its invaded range and insect associations in southern BC by LIANA KELSEY DIANE COLLETTE B.Sc. (with Great Distinction), University of Lethbridge, 2012 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFULLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Biology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Okanagan) AUGUST 2014 © Liana Kelsey Diane Collette, 2014 Abstract Russian olive is a small tree or large multi-stemmed shrub that was introduced to Canada and the United States (US) from Eurasia in the early 1900s. It was provisioned in large numbers during the last century to prairie farmers as a shelterbelt plant, and remains a popular and widely-available ornamental. Now invasive within some riparian ecosystems in the western US, Russian olive has been declared noxious in the states of Colorado and New Mexico. With traits including high shade tolerance and a symbiotic association with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, Russian olive has the potential to dominate riparian vegetation, and thus radically transform riparian ecosystems. Despite its naturalization in many parts of Canada, especially in the south-west, little is known about its potential invasion range or impact within Canadian ecosystems. In this thesis, I conducted a 3 part ecological assessment of Russian olive in Canada. First, I critically evaluated the potential for Russian olive to become invasive and problematic within riparian ecosystems in Canada. Second, I predicted the potential distribution of Russian olive in North America through ecological niche modeling, building substantially upon previous work by using ecologically relevant predictors and North American occurrence records. I found that Russian olive has not yet filled its potential range within North America, including riparian zones along economically important salmon-bearing rivers and streams in southern British Columbia. Third, I conducted the first standardized assessment of insect assemblages on Russian olive in comparison to two co-occurring native shrubs species, Woods’ rose and Saskatoon. I found that the insect family richness, diversity, community composition and community variance were no different from that of co-occurring native shrubs. These findings are consistent with a neutral response of insects to Russian olive compared to co-occurring native shrubs. The findings of this research will help guide management plans for Russian olive in Canada. ii Preface The research in this thesis was designed, performed, analyzed, and written by me, Liana Collette, in collaboration with my supervisory committee, Drs. Jason Pither, Robert Lalonde, and Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate. Insect and Russian olive occurrence data were collected with the help of Emma Walker and Prairie Shelterbelt Program Russian olive planting data were obtained from Darren Bruhjell (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada). iii Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................... ii Preface ................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................x Chapter 1: Introduction ..........................................................................................................1 1.1 General introduction ......................................................................................................1 1.2 Russian olive biology ......................................................................................................2 1.3 Russian olive distribution: past and present................................................................5 1.4 Ecological impacts ........................................................................................................10 1.5 Potential for management and control .......................................................................14 1.6 Anticipated impacts and future research needs ........................................................15 1.7 Summary .......................................................................................................................20 1.8 Research outline and objectives ..................................................................................20 Chapter 2: Predicting the potential invasion range of Russian olive in North America .22 2.1 Background ...................................................................................................................22 2.2 Methods and Materials ................................................................................................25 2.3 Results ...........................................................................................................................35 2.4 Discussion ......................................................................................................................45 Chapter 3: Insect assemblages associated with the exotic riparian shrub Russian olive, and co-occurring native shrubs ............................................................................................53 3.1 Background ...................................................................................................................53 3.2 Methods and Materials ................................................................................................57 3.3 Results ...........................................................................................................................62 3.4 Discussion ......................................................................................................................67 Chapter 4: Conclusion ...........................................................................................................73 4.1 General discussion ........................................................................................................73 4.2 Applications ..................................................................................................................74 4.3 Assumptions and limitations .......................................................................................75 iv 4.4 Future directions ..........................................................................................................77 Works Cited ............................................................................................................................80 Appendices ............................................................................................................................102 Appendix A – Supplementary figures and tables for Russian olive ecological niche modeling ............................................................................................................................102 Appendix B – Insect assemblages on Russian olive, Rose, and Saskatoon .................107 v List of Tables Table 1.1 Ecozones, natural habitats and habitat requirements of Russian olive and its confamilials in Canada .......................................................................................3 Table 2.1 Sources of georeferenced Russian olive locations in Canada and the US .......26 Table 2.2 Predictor variables used to derive the total and US dataset models ................31 Table 2.3 The average results for the Maxent ENMs showing the test AUC, the AUC standard deviation, the 10 percentile training presence test omission rate, the 10 percentile training presence threshold, and the amount of area predicted suitable and unsuitable for both models...........................................................43 Table 3.1 Site descriptions and number of host plant types sampled per site. Longitude and latitude are decimal degree values (WGS 1984 datum) ............................59 Table 3.2 Comparison of insect families unique to Russian olive in this study to insect families found on Russian olive in the Pendleton et al. (2011) study ..............69 Table A1 Pearson correlation coefficient (r) matrix of all predictors considered for ENM modeling...............................................................................................102 Table B1 Insect families found solely on each plant type .............................................107 Table B2 Abundance of adult insect orders and families found on each plant type during each sampling period (June, July, and August) .......................... 108-110 vi List of Figures Figure 1.1 Phylogenetic tree of the order Rosales...............................................................2 Figure 1.2 Number of Russian olive seedlings planted through the Prairie Shelterbelt Program ..............................................................................................................7 Figure 1.3 The years in which Russian olive was planted through the Prairie Shelterbelt Program ..............................................................................................................8
Recommended publications
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, DUPONT VIEWPOINT HERBICIDE, 09/19/2013
    C l(lb UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION Rebecca M. Ashley DuPont Crop Protection P.O. Box 30 bhP 19 Z013 Newark, DEI 9714 Subject: Notification; Per PR-Notice 98-10 DuPont Viewpoint Herbicide EPA Reg. No. 352-847 Date Submitted: September 16, 2013 Dear Ms. Ashley: The Agency is in receipt of your Application for Pesticide Notification under Pesticide Registration Notice (PRN) 98-10 dated September 16, 2013 for the product referenced above. The Registration Division (RD) has conducted a review of this request for its applicability under PRN 98-10 and finds that the action requested falls within the scope of PRN 98-10. The label submitted with the application has been stamped "Notification" and will be placed in our records. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (703) 306-0415 or [email protected]. Sincerely, Kable Bo Davis Product Manager 25 Herbicide Branch Registration Division (7505P) Ptemse read instructions on r»vor*» baton completing form. Form Approved. OMB No. 2070-0060. Approval expires 05-31-98 United States Registration OPP Identifier Number c/EFA Environmental Protection Agency Amendment Washington, DC 20460 Other xxxxxx Application for Pesticide - Section I 1. Company/Product Number 2. EPA Product Manager 3. Proposed Classification 352-847 Kable Davis I X I None I I Restricted 4. Company/Product (Name) PM* DuPont™ Viewpoint® Herbicide 25 5. Name and Address of Applicant (Include ZIP Code) 6. Expedited Review. In accordance with FIFRA Section 3(c)(3) E.
    [Show full text]
  • (GISD) 2021. Species Profile Lespedeza Cuneata. Available F
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Lespedeza cuneata Lespedeza cuneata System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Plantae Magnoliophyta Magnoliopsida Fabales Fabaceae Common name Chinese bush-clover (English), Chinese lespedeza (English), perennial lespedeza (English), sericea lespedeza (English), silky bush-clover (English), lesp?d?za soyeux (French), Japanischer Klee (German), lespedeza perenne (Spanish), Himalayan bushclover (English), hairy lespedeza (English) Synonym Anthyllis cuneata , Dum. Cours. Aspalathus cuneata , D. Don Hedysarum sericeum , Thunb. Lespedeza juncea , var. sericea Forbes & Hemsl. Lespedeza sericea , Benth. Lespedeza sericea , Miq. Lespedeza juncea , subsp. sericea (Maxim.) Steenis Lespedeza juncea , var. sericea Maxim. Similar species Summary Lespedeza cuneata is a long-lived perennial that grows well in grasslands, pastures, along roadsides, drainage areas, fencerows and in other disturbed areas. It is often found as a weed in cultivated areas, fallow and abandoned fields, meadows and marshes. It is adapted to a wide range of climatic conditions and is tolerant of drought. Lespedeza cuneata can survive freezing winter temperatures, but is often damaged by late spring freezes. Lespedeza cuneata grows best in deep soils, such as deep sands with organic matter or sandy loams with clay loam subsoil. It will also grow on strongly acidic to neutral soils. Dispersal is aided by animals that consume the fruits then pass the seeds; autumn dispersal is aided by the collection of hay in infested fields. view this species on IUCN Red List Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021. Species profile Lespedeza cuneata. Pag. 1 Available from: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=270 [Accessed 05 October 2021] FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Lespedeza cuneata Species Description Remaley (1997) states that L.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Indicator Shrubs and Herbs in Riparian Zones on National Forests of Central Oregon
    United States Department of Major Indicator Shrubs and Agriculture Herbs in Riparian Zones on Forest Service National Forests of Pacific Northwest Central Oregon. Region by Bernard L. Kovaichik William E. Hopkins and Steven J. Brunsfeld Major Indicator Shrubs and Herbs in Riparian Zones on National Forests of Central Oregon By Bernard L. Kovaichik, Area IV Riparian Ecologist William E. Hopkins, Area IV Area Ecologist and Steven J. Brunsfeld, University of Idaho June, 1988 1988 USDA - Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region R6-ECOL-TP-005-88 I Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank all those who kindlydonated their time to this publication. Thanks to Bill Hopkins and Rob Rawlings for blazingthe trail with their "Major indicator shrubs and herbson National Forests in eastern Oregon" (Hopkins and Rawlings, 1985). They developedthe format for this style of guide."Major indicator shrubs and herbs on National Forests of western Oregon and southwestern Washington"(Halverson and others, 1986) follows a similar format andwas another resource for developing this guide. Thanks to Carl Burke for illustrating some of thesketches in the glossary and Nancy Halverson, Linda Newman and Nancy Shaw forediting the document.Thanks to David Mattson for his sketch of eastwood willow. Photo credits: Bernard L. Kovalchik Steven J. Brunsfeld Wayne D. Padgett Line drawings used by permission from: Hitchcock, C. L., A. Cronquist, M. Ownberg and J. W. Thompson.1977. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Vol. 1-5. Univ. of Washington Press. Seattle. 2978p. Brunsfeld, S. J. and F. D. Johnson. 1985. Field guide to thewillows of east-central Idaho. Forest, Wildlife, and Range Experiment Station Bull.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiranthes Diluvialis Survey, 2004
    Spiranthes diluvialis Survey, 2004 Final ROCKY REACH HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC Project No. 2145 December 1, 2004 Prepared by: Beck Botanical Services Bellingham, WA Prepared for: Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County Wenatchee, Washington Rocky Reach Spiranthes diluvialis TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2: METHODS......................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 3: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.......................................................................... 2 3.1 Chelan Falls Population .................................................................................................................................3 3.2 Howard Flats Population................................................................................................................................4 3.3 Gallagher Flats Population .............................................................................................................................5 SECTION 4: CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 5 SECTION 5: REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 6 Spiranthes diluvialis SurveyFinal Report Rocky Reach Project No. 2145 December 1, 2004 Page i SS/8504 Rocky Reach Spiranthes diluvialis LIST OF TABLES Table 1: General comparison of
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Materials Tech Note
    United States Department of Agriculture NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Plant Materials Plant Materials Technical Note No. MT-33 September 1999 PLANT MATERIALS TECH NOTE DESCRIPTION, PROPAGATION, AND USE OF SILVERBERRY Elaeagnus commutata. Introduction: Silverberry Elaeagnus commutata Bernh. ex. Rydb is a native shrub with potential use in streambank stabilization, wildlife habitat, windbreaks, and naturalistic landscaping projects. The purpose of this bulletin is to transfer information on the identification, culture, and proper use of this species. FIGURE 1 FRUIT STEM FOLIAGE I. DESCRIPTION Silverberry is a multi-stemmed, deciduous shrub ranging from 1.5 to 3.6 m (5 to 12 ft.) tall. In Montana, heights of 1.5 to 2.4 m (5 to 8 ft.) are most common. It has an erect, upright habit with slender and sometimes twisted branches. The new stems are initially a light to medium brown color, the bark becoming dark gray, but remaining smooth, with age. The leaves are deciduous, alternate, 38 to 89 mm (1.5 to 3.5 in.) long and 19 to 38 mm (0.75 to 1.5 in.) wide (see Figure 1). The leaf shape is described as oval to narrowly ovate with an entire leaf margin. Both the upper and lower leaf surfaces are covered with silvery white scales, the bottom sometimes with brown spots. The highly fragrant, yellow flowers are trumpet-shaped (tubular), approximately 13 mm (0.5 in.) in length, and borne in the leaf axils in large numbers in May or June. The fruit is a silvery-colored, 7.6 mm (0.3 in.) long, egg-shaped drupe that ripens in September to October.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains
    United States Department of Agriculture Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-335 November 2016 Bergdahl, Aaron D.; Hill, Alison, tech. coords. 2016. Diseases of trees in the Great Plains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-335. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 229 p. Abstract Hosts, distribution, symptoms and signs, disease cycle, and management strategies are described for 84 hardwood and 32 conifer diseases in 56 chapters. Color illustrations are provided to aid in accurate diagnosis. A glossary of technical terms and indexes to hosts and pathogens also are included. Keywords: Tree diseases, forest pathology, Great Plains, forest and tree health, windbreaks. Cover photos by: James A. Walla (top left), Laurie J. Stepanek (top right), David Leatherman (middle left), Aaron D. Bergdahl (middle right), James T. Blodgett (bottom left) and Laurie J. Stepanek (bottom right). To learn more about RMRS publications or search our online titles: www.fs.fed.us/rm/publications www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/ Background This technical report provides a guide to assist arborists, landowners, woody plant pest management specialists, foresters, and plant pathologists in the diagnosis and control of tree diseases encountered in the Great Plains. It contains 56 chapters on tree diseases prepared by 27 authors, and emphasizes disease situations as observed in the 10 states of the Great Plains: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. The need for an updated tree disease guide for the Great Plains has been recog- nized for some time and an account of the history of this publication is provided here.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Identification of Salix (Willows) in Alberta
    A Guide to the identification of Salix (willows) in Alberta George W. Argus 2008 Devonian Botanical Garden Workshop on willow identification Jasper National Park, Alberta 2 Available from: George W. Argus 310 Haskins Rd, Merrickville R3, Ontario, Canada K0G 1N0 email: [email protected] http://aknhp.uaa.alaska.edu/willow/index.html 3 CONTENTS Preface............................................................................................................................... 5 Salicaceae ...........…………………...........……........................................……..........…. 8 Classification ..........……………….…..….................................................….............…. 9 Some Useful Morphological Characters .......................................................….............. 11 Key to the Species.............................................................................................................13 Taxonomic Treatment .........................................................…..……….………............ 18 Glossary .....………………………………………....…..................………...........….... 61 Cited and Selected References ......................................................................................... 64 Salix Web Sites ...................……..................................……..................……............…. 68 Distribution Maps ............................................................................................................ 69 TABLES Table 1. Comparison of Salix athabascensis and Salix pedicellaris ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List by Hardiness Zones
    Plant List by Hardiness Zones Zone 1 Zone 6 Below -45.6 C -10 to 0 F Below -50 F -23.3 to -17.8 C Betula glandulosa (dwarf birch) Buxus sempervirens (common boxwood) Empetrum nigrum (black crowberry) Carya illinoinensis 'Major' (pecan cultivar - fruits in zone 6) Populus tremuloides (quaking aspen) Cedrus atlantica (Atlas cedar) Potentilla pensylvanica (Pennsylvania cinquefoil) Cercis chinensis (Chinese redbud) Rhododendron lapponicum (Lapland rhododendron) Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (Lawson cypress - zone 6b) Salix reticulata (netleaf willow) Cytisus ×praecox (Warminster broom) Hedera helix (English ivy) Zone 2 Ilex opaca (American holly) -50 to -40 F Ligustrum ovalifolium (California privet) -45.6 to -40 C Nandina domestica (heavenly bamboo) Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (bearberry - zone 2b) Prunus laurocerasus (cherry-laurel) Betula papyrifera (paper birch) Sequoiadendron giganteum (giant sequoia) Cornus canadensis (bunchberry) Taxus baccata (English yew) Dasiphora fruticosa (shrubby cinquefoil) Elaeagnus commutata (silverberry) Zone 7 Larix laricina (eastern larch) 0 to 10 F C Pinus mugo (mugo pine) -17.8 to -12.3 C Ulmus americana (American elm) Acer macrophyllum (bigleaf maple) Viburnum opulus var. americanum (American cranberry-bush) Araucaria araucana (monkey puzzle - zone 7b) Berberis darwinii (Darwin's barberry) Zone 3 Camellia sasanqua (sasanqua camellia) -40 to -30 F Cedrus deodara (deodar cedar) -40 to -34.5 C Cistus laurifolius (laurel rockrose) Acer saccharum (sugar maple) Cunninghamia lanceolata (cunninghamia) Betula pendula
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment in Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Other Relevant Federal and State Laws and Regulations
    United States Department of Environmental Agriculture Forest Assessment Service June 2007 Buck Bald Ocoee/Hiwassee and Tellico Ranger Districts, Cherokee National Forest Polk and Monroe Counties, Tennessee For Information Contact: Janan Hay 250 Ranger Station Road Tellico Plains, TN 37385 423-253-8405 southernregion.fs.fed.us/cherokee The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Document Structure .................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose and Need
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of Gus Engeling Wildlife Management Area, Anderson County, Texas
    2003SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 2(3):347–368 THE VASCULAR FLORA OF GUS ENGELING WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS 1 2,3 2 JASON R. SINGHURST , JAMES C. CATHY , DALE PROCHASKA , 2 4 5 HAYDEN HAUCKE , GLENN C. KROH , AND WALTER C. HOLMES ABSTRACT - Field studies in the Gus Engeling Wildlife Management Area, which consists of approximately 4465.5 ha (11,034.1 acres) of the Post Oak Savannah of Anderson County, have resulted in an annotated checklist of the vascular flora corroborating its remarkable species richness. A total of 930 taxa (excluding family names), belonging to 485 genera and 145 families are re- corded. Asteraceae (124 species), Poaceae (114 species), Fabaceae (67 species), and Cyperaceae (61 species) represented the largest families. Six Texas endemic taxa occur on the site: Brazoria truncata var. pulcherrima (B. pulcherrima), Hymenopappus carrizoanus, Palafoxia reverchonii, Rhododon ciliatus, Trades- cantia humilis, and T. subacaulis. Within Texas, Zigadenus densus is known only from the study area. The area also has a large number of species that are endemic to the West Gulf Coastal Plain and Carrizo Sands phytogeographic distribution patterns. Eleven vegetation alliances occur on the property, with the most notable being sand post oak-bluejack oak, white oak-southern red oak-post oak, and beakrush-pitcher plant alliances. INTRODUCTION The Post Oak Savannah (Gould 1962) comprises about 4,000,000 ha of gently rolling to hilly lands that lie immediately west of the Pineywoods (Timber belt). Some (Allred and Mitchell 1955, Dyksterhuis 1948) consider the vegetation of the area as part of the deciduous forest; i.e., burned out forest that is presently regenerating.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Trees and Shrubs for Montana
    Conservation Trees and Shrubs for Montana Montana mt.nrcs.usda.gov Introduction When you are contemplating which tree or shrub species to plant, your first thought might be, “Will this plant thrive here?” You will want to know if the plant will tolerate the temperatures, moisture, and soil conditions of the area. This publication focuses on identifying and describing trees and shrubs capable of tolerating Montana’s severe climatic and environmental conditions, the site conditions where they are best adapted to grow, and some of the benefits each tree and shrub provides. When looking at each of the provided attributes, consider these two points. First, these characteristics and traits are approximations, and variability within a species is quite common. Second, plant performance varies over time as a plant grows and matures. For example, even “drought tolerant” species require adequate moisture until their root systems become well established. Landowners and managers, homeowners, and others plant trees and shrubs for many reasons, including: windbreaks for livestock protection and crop production, shelterbelts for homes and farmsteads to reduce wind speed and conserve energy usage, living snow fences to trap and manage snow, hedgerows as visual and noise screens, landscaping for beautification around homes and parks, wildlife habitat and food, blossoms for pollinators such as bees, streamside and wetland restoration, reforestation following timber harvest or wildfire, and fruit and berries for human use to name just a few. Montana encompasses 93.3 million acres with temperature extremes ranging from -50 degrees F in northeast Montana, to 110 degrees F in summer in southcentral Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza Cuneata) Invasion
    SERICEA LESPEDEZA (LESPEDEZA CUNEATA) INVASION: IMPLICATIONS FOR A SMALL MAMMAL COMMUNITY AND THE INFLUENCE OF LOCAL FIRE HISTORY By JEFFREY M. HOWARD Bachelor of Science in Fish and Wildlife Biology Northeastern State University Tahlequah, OK 1998 Master of Science in Biology Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, TN 2000 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 2013 SERICEA LESPEDEZA (LESPEDEZA CUNEATA) INVASION: IMPLICATIONS FOR A SMALL MAMMAL COMMUNITY AND THE INFLUENCE OF LOCAL FIRE HISTORY Dissertation Approved: Kristen A. Baum, Ph.D. Dissertation Adviser Barney Luttbeg, Ph.D. Samuel D. Fuhlendorf, Ph.D. Janette A. Steets, Ph.D. ii Name: JEFFREY M. HOWARD Date of Degree: DECEMBER 2013 Title of Study: SERICEA LESPEDEZA (LESPEDEZA CUNEATA) INVASION: IMPLICATIONS FOR A SMALL MAMMAL COMMUNITY AND THE INFLUENCE OF LOCAL FIRE HISTORY Major Field: ZOOLOGY Abstract: Lespedeza cuneata [(Dumont) G. Don] is a perennial legume first introduced to North America from eastern Asia in 1896 and is now widespread and well established across much of the eastern and central United States. Possible impacts of invasion and mechanisms of spread however are poorly understood. I assessed the influence of three L. cuneata cover classes (i.e., < 5%, 15 – 20%, and > 25% per m2) on a small mammal community in eastern Oklahoma (February 2010 to December 2011). I also examined the relationship between local fire history and L. cuneata cover and also considered the effect of plant invasion on the vegetation community in these same areas. My results indicate small mammal community diversity decreased with increasing L.
    [Show full text]