Fifth-Century Horoi on Aigina 233

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fifth-Century Horoi on Aigina 233 HESPERIA 78 (2OO9) FIFTH-CENTURY HOROI Pages 231-267 ON AIGINA A Reevaluation ABSTRACT In this article, the author reexamines the 14 known horos inscriptions from new Aigina in connection with the discovery of four horoi, published here for the firsttime. These additional horoi lend new support to the arguments? debated by many scholars?for the date (431-404 B.C.), occasion (Athenian occupation ofAigina during thePeloponnesianWar), authorship (Athenian), and purpose (markers of agricultural estates) of theAiginetan horoi. The article presents a fresh view ofAthenian motivations for the introduction of to on agricultural temene dedicated the gods Aigina and in other conquered territoriesduring theAthenian Empire. INTRODUCTION Fourteen ancient boundary inscriptions, each including the word opoq are as (horos), currently registered in the epigraphic corpora having been at on found various locations the island of Aigina (Fig. 1, Table l).1 These horoi never as a (1-14) have been discussed group.2 The date and as as authorship of these inscriptions, well theirmeaning and purpose, are amatter of are s debate.3 Beyond dispute the horoi Attic dialect and script,4 and theirAiginetan provenance. In this intriguing confluence of facts lies to 1.A detailed discussion of thefind this work, and the epimelete of Ai (1990) included 13, but not 1 and 14, of the horoi is below. Helen for her assis in spots presented gina, Papastavrou, his study. Iwould like to thankMerle tance. All illustrations and translations 3. vol. Lang Furtwangler 1906, 1, p. 6; are don, Robert Parker, Molly Richardson, my own, unless otherwise indicated. IG IV 29-38;Welter 1954, col. 35; Bar Ron and Thomas as 2. Horoi and 13 are not ron Stroud, Figueira, 2,12, 1983;Mattingly 1996, p. 7; Smar well as the reviewers of in anonymous included IGIV; Barron (1983) did czyk 1990, pp. 109-129; Figueira 1991, for at not Hesperia, theirhelpful feedback discuss 1 (mistakingit for2), 13, pp. 115-120; Hornblower 1992, p. 183; different in the or stages preparation of 14; the editorsof IG I3 considered Parker 1996, pp. 144-145; Osborne this article. Thanks are also due to the 1 2 to same and possiblybe the horos 2000, p. 110;Mylonopoulos 2003, former director of the 2nd comment on Ephorate (see 1481), and missed pp. 49-52. the29th ofClassical 13 and 14. most scholars (now Ephorate) Subsequently, 4. IG IV, p. 10; Barron 1983, p. 10; Antiquities, George Steinhauer, for reliedon Barron 1983 and IG I3 and IGY 1481-1490. me to out were not aware of granting permission carry omissions; Smarczyk ? The American School of Classical Studies at Athens 232 IRENE POLINSKAYA ??>-^<okkalaki \ r~S M2 ) \ Aphaia Sanctuary / / A V ^/^^ Mesagros {? Pa,ai0Ch0ra \ /-^ktmpos n? / KolonnayZsC_/-v ^_?^ Afi Marina ^Aigina Ay.Asomatoi (Ay. V VlichadaS ^^vMarathonas As ( \\ fZeus Hellanios Sanctuary C (my \ Oros Moni jJ \y J C^^^y CC^^^jf Sphendouri A Apollo/Poseidon Horoi /Mena ^ Figure 1. Known findspots of AnonymousAiginetan horoi 1-9,12, and 13, and _Ipossible locations of 10. H. Walda themain interest of theAiginetan horoi for historians of ancient Greece. The present reevaluation is called for by recent developments in the field new of 5th-century Attic epigraphy and epigraphic and archaeological on findings Aigina, including four newly discovered horoi, 15-18 (Table 1). new Study of these examples supports the original interpretation of the Aiginetan horoi proposed byAdolf Furtwangler in 1906, namely, that the were horoi installed by Athenians during their occupation of the island in 431-404 B.C. tomark the bounds of newly created agricultural temene. a new on The present study also offers perspective Athenian motivations on as as for introducing temene Aigina, well in other foreign territories, during theAthenian Empire. Athenian horoi used tomark the bounds of temene have been identi case fied in several other locations besides Aigina,5 but Aiginas is of special historical interest.To appreciate the depth of intrigue presented by Attic on one boundary markers Aigina, must recall the history of relations be tween the two states.During theArchaic and Classical periods, Athens and were at times and at times enemies on the economic, Aigina rivals, outright 5. IG I3 1491-1499, and 1502, political, and ideological fronts: they represented different ethnic identities discussed below. and different 6. For on relations be (Ionic and Doric, respectively) political systems (democracy bibliography tween Athens and see Kehne and oligarchy), and they competed formarine trading routes, naval power, Aigina, 1998, pp. 48-49; and Figueira 1981, and influence in the Panhellenic arena.6The rivalrybetween the two states with references to earlier was acute to as 1991,1993, particularly due their geographic position: neighbors in the bibliography,to which shouldbe added Saronic had to share In this Gulf, they navigational space. regard,Aiginas De Ste. Croix 2004 (althoughwritten themiddle of the Saronic Gulf advantageous position?in opposite Piraeus, in 1965 or 1966, thispaper was pub to lished in 1988. the main harbor ofAthens?enabled theAiginetans obstruct the flow only 2004); Jennings FIFTH-CENTURY HOROI ON AIGINA 233 TABLE 1. CATALOGUE OF AIGINETAN HOROI Hons Text IGYV2 IGV Barron 1983 IGIV ^ _ _ \ g02 37 xejievoc 2 h6p?q 803 14811 t?u?voc *6p??rl3 804 1482238 hopoq xeuivoc 4 AttoMcov- 798 1483433 [o]c, IIogei 5covoc, fropoc, 5 799 148434 t?^?4 3 nooei5covoc hopoq xeuivo[c] 6 AtioUcov- 800 1485535 [o]c. noa[ei] 8covo<; [hopoq xeuivoc] 7 Ati6U[cov]- 801 USSMs6 36 [o]qnoa[ei] 5covoc, #6poc. 8 xeuivoc 792 1486729 AGevoaac. hopOC, 9 xeuivoc 793 1487 30 10 AOevaiac hopoq xeuevoc10 794 14881131 AOevouac ^6po[c] 11 xeuevoc 796 14898 32 AOevaiec #6poc 12 xeuivoc 797 14909 ? ABevoueq Wopoq ?? ? 13 xeuivoc 795 AGevcaac, 14 . opoc_1074_?_?_1592 15 opoc 16 opoc; 17 opoc, 18 opoc. The texts are of horoi 1-14 cited from IG IV2 (2007). For ease of reference, the horos numbers in IG F Barron and IG IV are (fasc. 2,1994), 1983, (1902) also supplied. 234 IRENE POLINSKAYA to of traffic Athens at will, leading theAthenians to regard the island as "an eyesore of Piraeus."7 This situation became increasingly intolerable for as more theAthenians they came to rely and more, especially in the course on of the 5th century B.C., the supply of grain and other necessities of life two from overseas.8 Given the persistent animosity between the states, the on presence Aigina of Attic horoi, presumptive signs of land ownership, come raises two questions: when and how could the Athenians have to manage properties in the territoryof their bitter enemy? a The only known time when the Athenians had free hand in the was management ofAiginetan territorial affairs the period of the Pelopon was nesianWar. According toThucydides (2.27), theAiginetan population summer were sent removed fromAigina in the of 431, and Athenian settlers to in their place shortly afterward (ox>noXkG)).9 The first scholars publish on the horoi connected their presence Aigina with the activities ofAthenian settlers during the occupation of the island in 431-404 B.C.10This inter was on pretation prevailed until 1983, when it challenged epigraphic to move grounds by John Barron, who argued for the need the dates of some use the inscriptions back to the 450s because Aiginetan horoi three on barred sigmas and tailed rhos.11This redating of the Aiginetan horoi scenarios to epigraphic grounds prompted the invention of questionable in to the explain Athenian interference Aiginetan territorial affairs prior on arrival ofAthenian settlers the island.12The epigraphic principles that Barron used to support his dating of theAiginetan horoi have since been now cannot be sustained.13 challenged, and many epigraphists agree that they the The date of theAiginetan horoi and the related questions concerning are horoi's purpose and meaning therefore due for reexamination. to war so andAmit 47 7. A famous remark attributed upon them. Besides, Aigina lies pp. 115-120) (1973, pp. near it Barron's Perikles (Plut. Per. 8.7), and alterna the Peloponnese, that seemed 48) accepted dating. to to send of their own to 12.Amit Barron tivelyto Demades (Ath. 3.99d): xhy safer colonists 1973, p. 48; 1983; xou the 437. Aiywav coc,^n.unv UEipaiEcoc, aye hold it, and shortly afterwards Figueira 1991, pp. 115-120; 1998, p. see were sent R. Craw 13. On the use of the three-barred Xexv keXevooli. On this phrase, settlers out" (trans. in furtherAmit 1973, p. 36. On Periklean ley,London 1993). sigma in late-5th-century Attic see 10. This was the see Chambers, Gallucci, and actions against Aigina, Figueira original explanation scriptions, Chambers 1991, pp. 111-113. offeredby Furtwangler (1906, vol. 1, Spanos 1990; 1992-1993, 8.Hopper (1979, pp. 71-92, esp. p. 6) and IGIV 29-39; followedby Wel 1993,1994; Figueira 1998, p. 442, n. Mat p. 73 with referenceto Hdt. 7.147) ter (1954, col. 35) andMattingly (1996, 41; Tsirigoti-Drakotou 2000; was in of thaiou Stroud 34-35. suggests that Aigina control p. 7), and restatedby Smarczyk (1990, 2004; 2006, pp. trade from the Pontus after 494/3 B.C. pp. 118-119). For criticism of Chambers's dating of reservations ex IG the so-called Decree, 9. Thuc. 2.27: Aveomaav 5e icai 11. In spite of the I311, Egesta to 418/7 B.C., see Alyivnxac, Tcp amcp Gepei xowcp e^ Ai pressed byMattingly (1996, pp. 6-7; Henry 1992,1993, xe was Lewis 1993. Cer yivr\q 'A0T\vaioi, amove, Kai rcaTSac, the relevant chapter originally pub 1995,1998,2001; Kai yovaiKac,, E7UKaA,Eaavx?<; oux lished in 1961) on the soundnessof tainly,Figueira's (1998, pp. 431-465) as a sure indication of an automatic downdat riKiaxa xou 7ioXejio\) acpiaiv aixiouc using letter forms warning against to the420s or 410s of all the in Eivai.
Recommended publications
  • The Higher Aspects of Greek Religion. Lectures Delivered at Oxford and In
    BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIET OF Henirg m. Sage 1891 .A^^^ffM3. islm^lix.. 5931 CornelJ University Library BL 25.H621911 The higher aspects of Greek religion.Lec 3 1924 007 845 450 The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924007845450 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES 1911 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES THE HIGHER ASPECTS OF GREEK RELIGION LECTURES DELIVERED AT OXFORD AND IN LONDON IN APRIL AND MAY igii BY L. R. FARNELL, D.Litt. WILDE LECTURER IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD LONDON WILLIAMS AND NORGATE GARDEN, W.C. 14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT 1912 CONTENTS Lecture I GENERAL FEATURES AND ORIGINS OF GREEK RELIGION Greek religion mainly a social-political system, 1. In its earliest " period a " theistic creed, that is^ a worship of personal individual deities, ethical personalities rather than mere nature forces, 2. Anthrqgomorphism its predominant bias, 2-3. Yet preserving many primitive features of " animism " or " animatism," 3-5. Its progress gradual without violent break with its distant past, 5-6. The ele- ment of magic fused with the religion but not predominant, 6-7. Hellenism and Hellenic religion a blend of two ethnic strains, one North-Aryan, the other Mediterranean, mainly Minoan-Mycenaean, 7-9. Criteria by which we can distinguish the various influences of these two, 9-1 6. The value of Homeric evidence, 18-20. Sum- mary of results, 21-24. Lecture II THE RELIGIOUS BOND AND MORALITY OF THE FAMILY The earliest type of family in Hellenic society patrilinear, 25-27.
    [Show full text]
  • Philokleon's Court
    PHILOKLEON'SCOURT (PLATE 32) - . GO KaOCECo-avr?wv Oapp&v KbTEV- KOPT5AIO0 oV'8EIJirwEtcrW p,Mq8E'v &Et &XX' 3XrTW-(TE (a,.EvoL rott TrarpcpotL OEO'TLV. NDIAOKAES2N - c AvKE 8&r7oroma, YELTCOV -qpCo0 0v yap OLO7TEp E)'W KEXap??loFa rOUt& &aKpV-OLftV TCOVVckovYVTcov aIE KaL Tots o0Xovpp/.LOZ*K71)aaS Y7v E7lrt7r?8E Ka3OVX j ov EvTavOra vwa ravr aKpOqO 7 pvc Trapa rov KXaovTa ~ ~ a OX OVVV TOVqOa1YOt) 7cOVO ~T' TL"wov KX1J7 T KaO7TaOa. EXEaOV7T)toxopov7Tcooov Kat vvt rov KOVuavrov TOTE (0OV lrapa TaS Kavvas OVp?)cT) fUq8 aITro7rap&o. Aristophanes, Wasps, 387-394 T is possiblethat a topographicalreference can be enucleatedfrom Philokleon's prayer, but first the currents of humor in these lines must be charted and reliable elements in traditional " information " about Lykos isolated. This essay is divided into three sections: 1) an analysis of ancient reports concerning Lykos, 2) an inter- pretation of Aristophanes, Wasps, 387-394, 3) a suggestion as to the location of Philokleon's law court. LYKOS Although the name was not rare, the particular Lykos of Aristophanes, Wasps, 387-394 has not been plausibly identified with any of the rivers, heroes or mortals who were also called Lykos.' In fact, despite the elaborations of scholarship, early and late, almost everything that can confidently be said of him has its source in the lines quoted at the head of this paper. From these lines, we can extract the following information: 1) Lykos is a hero, 2) his heroon is in or near a law court, and 3) his ' Under the heading " Lykos " in R.E., 1927, cols.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divinity of Hellenistic Rulers
    OriginalverCORE öffentlichung in: A. Erskine (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World,Metadata, Oxford: Blackwell citation 2003, and similar papers at core.ac.uk ProvidedS. 431-445 by Propylaeum-DOK CHAPTKR TWENTY-FIVE The Divinity of Hellenistic Rulers Anßdos Chaniotis 1 Introduction: the Paradox of Mortal Divinity When King Demetrios Poliorketes returned to Athens from Kerkyra in 291, the Athenians welcomed him with a processional song, the text of which has long been recognized as one of the most interesting sources for Hellenistic ruler cult: How the greatest and dearest of the gods have come to the city! For the hour has brought together Demeter and Demetrios; she comes to celebrate the solemn mysteries of the Kore, while he is here füll of joy, as befits the god, fair and laughing. His appearance is majestic, his friends all around him and he in their midst, as though they were stars and he the sun. Hail son of the most powerful god Poseidon and Aphrodite. (Douris FGrH76 Fl3, cf. Demochares FGrH75 F2, both at Athen. 6.253b-f; trans. as Austin 35) Had only the first lines of this ritual song survived, the modern reader would notice the assimilaüon of the adventus of a mortal king with that of a divinity, the etymo- logical association of his name with that of Demeter, the parentage of mighty gods, and the external features of a divine ruler (joy, beauty, majesty). Very often scholars reach their conclusions about aspects of ancient mentality on the basis of a fragment; and very often - unavoidably - they conceive only a fragment of reality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cult and the Temple of Athena Nike
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2018 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2018 Victorious Athena: The Cult and The Temple of Athena Nike Brynlie-Sage Johnston Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2018 Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, and the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Johnston, Brynlie-Sage, "Victorious Athena: The Cult and The Temple of Athena Nike" (2018). Senior Projects Spring 2018. 229. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2018/229 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Victorious Athena: The Cult and The Temple of Athena Nike Senior Project Submitted to The Division of the Language & Literature of Bard College by Brynlie-Sage Johnston Annandale-on-Hudson, New York May 2018 2 Dedicated to the late Ralph Waynard Lowe. Thank you for introducing me to Greece. Peculiar travel suggestions are like dancing lessons from God.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ENDURING GODDESS: Artemis and Mary, Mother of Jesus”
    “THE ENDURING GODDESS: Artemis and Mary, Mother of Jesus” Carla Ionescu A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HUMANITIES YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO May 2016 © Carla Ionescu, 2016 ii Abstract: Tradition states that the most popular Olympian deities are Apollo, Athena, Zeus and Dionysius. These divinities played key roles in the communal, political and ritual development of the Greco-Roman world. This work suggests that this deeply entrenched scholarly tradition is fissured with misunderstandings of Greek and Ephesian popular culture, and provides evidence that clearly suggests Artemis is the most prevalent and influential goddess of the Mediterranean, with roots embedded in the community and culture of this area that can be traced further back in time than even the arrival of the Greeks. In fact, Artemis’ reign is so fundamental to the cultural identity of her worshippers that even when facing the onslaught of early Christianity, she could not be deposed. Instead, she survived the conquering of this new religion under the guise of Mary, Mother of Jesus. Using methods of narrative analysis, as well as review of archeological findings, this work demonstrates that the customs devoted to the worship of Artemis were fundamental to the civic identity of her followers, particularly in the city of Ephesus in which Artemis reigned not only as Queen of Heaven, but also as Mother, Healer and Saviour. Reverence for her was as so deeply entrenched in the community of this city, that after her temple was destroyed, and Christian churches were built on top of her sacred places, her citizens brought forward the only female character in the new ruling religion of Christianity, the Virgin Mary, and re-named her Theotokos, Mother of God, within its city walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Gifts Given to Delian Apollo During the Greek Archaic Period
    Spectacular Gifts: Gifts Given to Delian Apollo During the Greek Archaic Period Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bonnie McCutcheon Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee Greg Anderson, Advisor Nathan Rosenstein Timothy E. Gregory 1 Copyrighted by Bonnie McCutcheon 2018 2 Abstract Delos, birthplace to the gods Apollo and Artemis, was home to a significant sanctuary to Apollo in the Greek Archaic Period. Apollo and his sanctuary received many spectacular gifts which stand out in the historical record, including world-premiere works of art, such as the Nikandre kore. The turannos of Samos, Polycrates, notably gave to Apollo the neighboring island of Rheneia, which he attached to Delos with a chain. These and other gifts include elements of the spectacular which make them stand out. To understand the role played by elements of spectacle in gifts at Delos, we must examine these gifts as a discourse. Only by putting them in context with one another can we fully understand the messages that each gift was meant to communicate. Ultimately, I will argue that this is a discourse about establishing and performing identity as xenoi (guest- friends) of the gods and as megaloprepes (magnificent or great men). iii Dedication For Russ, who always believed in me, even when I did not. iv Acknowledgments The composition of this dissertation has spanned over a decade of my life, and could not have been completed without the support of my family and mentors at the Ohio State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Artemis: Goddess of Conservation Author(S): J
    Artemis: Goddess of Conservation Author(s): J. Donald Hughes Source: Forest & Conservation History, Vol. 34, No. 4 (Oct., 1990), pp. 191-197 Published by: Forest History Society and American Society for Environmental History Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3983705 . Accessed: 07/05/2014 23:17 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Forest History Society and American Society for Environmental History are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Forest &Conservation History. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Wed, 7 May 2014 23:17:35 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Artemis Goddess of Conservation J. Donald Hughes w The ancientGreeks represented the -I- ancientGreece resulted from the trans- spiritof conservationin the shape formationof a generaltype that had of a formidableprotectress of ani- existed for millennia. The mistressof mals and plants, the goddess Artemis. game was believedto protectwild ani- In the Louvreone can view a striking mals in general,or certain species, and statueof Artemis(or as the Romans to exact retributionfrom huntersin called her, Diana) in a runningpose, cases of disrespector improperinjury known as the Diana of Versailles,a or killing.
    [Show full text]
  • Demeter and Persephone As Temenos: a Perspective of Understanding Postpartum Depression
    Mythological Studies Journal 5 (2014) / 31-38 Demeter and Persephone as Temenos: A Perspective of Understanding Postpartum Depression Stephanie Zajchowski Abstract Bringing life into the world is an awe inspiring endeavor. Few walk away from the experience unchanged. Yet, the transformation of the feminine body mirrors the transformation of the feminine psyche, what occurs physically also occurs instinctually. One does not develop without affecting the other. Often these ripples of change can tear open the psyche causing a loss of self that is labeled as postpartum depression, anxiety, or depression. This article explores a postpartum loss of self and the personal experience of postpartum depression through the myth of Demeter and Persephone. There is an unaided search for meaning in motherhood that is explored in this article through myth. It aims to pursue a deeper understanding of women through a conversation of the feminine soul. Keywords Demeter, Persephone, postpartum depression, motherhood, women’s studies, mothers groups “Once you shave your legs, you can not go back.” Wise words spoken from a knowing mother watching her daughter “lingering on the borders of Hades [...]” (Jung and Kerényi 108). Many events in life hold this truth - the death of a loved one, the submission of our body to the pleasure of another, the birth of a child. Events such as these alter us. And though the decision to descend is sometimes our own, the descent never feels completely willing. “The ego still yearns for the status quo, but further down the price has been paid, and we can’t go back” (Luke 195).
    [Show full text]
  • The Kingdom of Mycenae
    THE KINGDOM OF MYCENAE To my parents and my brother The Kingdom of Mycenae A Great Kingdom in the Late Bronze Age Aegean by Jorrit M. Kelder CDL Press Bethesda, Maryland 2010 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Kelder, Jorrit M. The kingdom of Mycenae : a great kingdom in the late Bronze Age Aegean / by Jorrit M. Kelder. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-934309-27-8 1. Mycenae (Extinct city) 2. Aegean Sea Region--Antiquities. 3. Bronze age--Aegean Sea Region. 4. Historic sites--Aegean Sea Region. 5. Excavations (Archaeology)--Aegean Sea Region. 6. Aegean Sea Region-- History, Local. 7. Aegean Sea Region--History. I. Title. DF221.M9K45 2010 938'.01--dc22 2010000179 © 2010. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publisher, CDL Press. ISBN 978-1934309-278 — CONTENTS — List of Maps vi Acknowledgments vii Prologue viii Introduction 1 The Textual Evidence 7 The Linear B Tablets 1 Ahhiyawa and Western Anatolia 21 The Egyptian Perception 35 Iconography 40 The Mycenaean World according to the Texts 44 The Archaeological Evidence 49 Mycenaean Artefacts on the Anatolian West Coast 49 Ahhiyawa in Western Anatolia 61 Mycenaean Artefacts in Egypt 62 Tanaju, the Kingdom of Mycenae and Ahhiyawa 85 Search for the Heartland 85 Thebes or Mycenae? 88 Archaeology of Empire 99 Archaeology of the Mycenaean
    [Show full text]
  • From Polis to Borders: Demarcation of Social and Ritual Space in the Sanctuary of Poseidon at Kalaureia, Greece1
    From Polis to Borders: Demarcation of Social and Ritual Space in the 1 Sanctuary of Poseidon at Kalaureia, Greece PETRA PAKKANEN The Kalaureia Research Programme Abstract This article focuses on three interrelated themes in the study of an- cient Greek religion, looked at through the material evidence from the sanctuary of Poseidon at Kalaureia on the island of Poros, Greece. First, I look at the so-called polis model and its applicability to an interpretation of Kalaureian material related to the cultic life of the sanctuary from the point of view of the ‘historiography’ of Greek religion. I then discuss the historical context of the archaeological material, with particular emphasis on the topic of the sanctuary as a known place of asylum particularly during the Hellenistic period. Thirdly, I examine the archaeological material related to eating and dining and its potential connection to the demarcation between sacred and profane activities and between sacralised and profane space in the sanctuary, with special interpretative attention to the significance of border(s) and boundaries. Drawing attention to these issues may help us understand the dynamics and interplay between ‘official’ and ‘private’ aspects of ancient Greek religion, within both the tradi- tion of the scholarship of ancient Greek religion and the so-called ‘archaeology of cult’. Keywords: Ancient Greek religion, Greek city-state, Kalaureia, archaeology of cult, demarcating sacred In this article I discuss the interpretation of the archaeological material re- lated to religion and cult at the sanctuary of Poseidon at Kalaureia, on the island of Poros, Greece. My approach encompasses three distinct but inter- related aspects for studying the social and physical demarcation of ritual and sacred space at the sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    Temenos AG Annual Report and Accounts 2020 MAKING BANKING BETTER, TOGETHER Over 3,000 firms across the globe, including 41 of the world’s top 50 banks, rely on Temenos to process the client interactions and daily transactions of more than 1.2 billion banking customers. Overview At a glance THE WORLD’S #1 BANKING SOFTWARE COMPANY Temenos software is proven to enable its top-performing clients to achieve cost-income ratios of 26.8%, half the industry average, and returns on equity of 29%, three times the industry average. 1.2 bn Individuals, families and businesses rely on Temenos. That’s 30% of the world’s banked population 41 Our 3,000 banks include 41 of the top 50 global banks Cloud-native and SaaS-ready The APIs can be accessed via a development portal for Temenos solutions are cloud native and SaaS-ready. documentation and testing purposes, and allow banks #1 This means that the software can run natively on cloud to rapidly make changes to their solutions and overall They rely on the world’s infrastructure, taking full advantage of cloud-native operational environment in an insulated and clearly defined capabilities like dynamic scalability and in-built resilience. way using modern technology and design approaches #1 cloud-native intelligent This materially reduces the operational cost of running which shorten the time needed to accomplish this. Some banking platform the technology infrastructure, allowing the bank to scale banks with legacy systems struggle to decompose and operations up or down as needed. Our software is also modernize their core banking solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Mysteries
    GREEK MYSTERIES Mystery cults represent the spiritual attempts of the ancient Greeks to deal with their mortality. As these cults had to do with the individual’s inner self, privacy was paramount and was secured by an initiation ceremony, a personal ritual that estab- lished a close bond between the individual and the gods. Once initiated, the indi- vidual was liberated from the fear of death by sharing the eternal truth, known only to the immortals. Because of the oath of silence taken by the initiates, a thick veil of secrecy covers those cults and archaeology has become our main tool in deciphering their meaning. In a field where archaeological research constantly brings new data to light, this volume provides a close analysis of the most recent discoveries, as well as a critical re-evaluation of the older evidence. The book focuses not only on the major cults of Eleusis and Samothrace, but also on the lesser-known Mysteries in various parts of Greece, over a period of almost two thousand years, from the Late Bronze Age to the Roman Imperial period. In our mechanized and technology-oriented world, a book on Greek spirituality is both timely and appropriate. The authors’ inter-disciplinary approach extends beyond the archaeological evidence to cover the textual and iconographic sources and provides a better understanding of the history and rituals of those cults. Written by an international team of acknowledged experts, Greek Mysteries is an important contribution to our understanding of Greek religion and society. Michael B. Cosmopoulos is the Hellenic Government–Karakas Foundation Profes- sor of Greek Studies and Professor of Greek Archaeology at the University of Missouri-St.
    [Show full text]