Apollo and the Archaic Temple at Corinth 403

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Apollo and the Archaic Temple at Corinth 403 HESPERIA 73 (2004) APOLLO AND THE Pages 40z-426 ARCHAIC TEMPLE AT CORINTH ABSTRACT After a detailed examination of the literary,epigraphic, and archaeological evidence, the authors argue that the prominent Archaic Doric temple at Corinth was dedicatedto Apollo. It is this temple with its bronze statue that Pausanias(2.3.6) saw on his right as he left the areaof the forum, taking the road to Sikyon. In furthersupport of this identification,the authorspresent a previously unpublished Archaic terracottapinax, possibly inscribed with a dedication to Apollo. The plaquewas found duringexcavations at Corinth in 1902 and is now, apparently,lost. The Archaic Doric temple that stands on the hill above the Roman forum at Corinth is the single most imposing monument to that city's earlygreat- ness.' Visible since the middle of the sixth century B.C.when it was built, the temple has served as a beacon and focus for early travelers, the first excavatorsof Corinth, and visitors to the site. Nevertheless, the identifica- tion of this major monument has remained a matter of debate.2 In 1886, the first excavator,Wilhelm Dbrpfeld, stated that the temple's dedication was unknown, although some had attributedit to Athena Chali- nitis.3 In the earliest excavation reports of the American School of Classi- cal Studies at Athens, it appearsas the "Old Temple."4With the discovery of the theater in 1897 and the Fountain of Peirene in 1898, however, the excavated site of Corinth could be related to the description of Pausanias, and by 1898 Rufus B. Richardson had identified the Old Temple as the Temple of Apollo.5 It was published as such by Richard Stillwell6 and, in 1. We aregrateful to Benjamin Scahillfor help with the plans;and of nomenclaturethan that of the old Millis,Elizabeth G. Pemberton,Chris- KarenSoteriou and Martin Sedaghat temple at Corinth."A centuryof topherPfaff, Helen C. Stroud,Rudolf fortheir drawings of Figs.4 and5, scholarshiphas yet to effect a satisfac- Wachter,and Charles K. Williams II respectively.All translationsare by tory cure. for readingan earlierdraft of thispaper R. S. Stroud. 3. D6rpfeld 1886, p. 305. andsubstantially improving it. Com- 2. Fora usefuldiscussion of the his- 4. Richardson1897. mentsfrom the two anonymousHes- toryof thisproblem, see Powell1905, 5. Richardson1898, p. 236. peria readershave also been very help- p. 44, who observedthat, "No ruin in 6. CorinthI, pp. 115-134. ful.We thankJames Herbst and David Greece has sufferedmore on the score American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to Hesperia ® www.jstor.org 402 NANCY BOOKIDIS AND RONALD S. STROUD 1905, Benjamin Powell asserted that "subsequentexcavations have made this [identification] practically certain and from the evidence given by Dr. Richardson we may rest assured that this was truly the Temple of Apollo."'7This statement, however, has not found universal assent.8A re- cent rediscovery of an inscribed clay plaque from the 1902 excavations takes on greater significance as possible additional evidence for the identi- fication of the temple. Before presenting this important new find, we first review the literary, epigraphic, architectural,and archaeological evidence for the identity of the Archaic temple, which, as far as we know, has never been thoroughly examined in one place.9 LITERARY EVIDENCE We begin with the particularpassage in Pausaniasthat relates to this issue, 2.3.6-2.4.5. Here, and elsewhere in his description of Corinth, the perie- getes10uses the word &dyopodfor the large, open, paved area to the south of Temple Hill, which we will call the "forum"of the Roman city of Corinth. 8X~ ELX0COVOC V 'Eeo'Pcv E? CX&yopoCYZTV-S7t epXojlvotSGL aStLV Ev xcxi xci 3s•@ -i0 6806 vcx6; 0yCycxXhXopxoiv 'AT6?hXX0vo; 6XL- yov -r;ainpcoxtpqve XaCXoyotuvv yop -cowa6r-'vkppytnv rFoad,6xl" - oxCixqv,I ;XyoUom, -cov Mr-s•xa FScOoOaLCpaxp0CXCov 68bop voEtioGoap oiblCc. to7c•Q za6znt) v TcoeroqaTcL-V axtvelv xolen xcbon0-a 3o O C 11vov 'Q0E?ov,70CpOC CO'ZC6vi4t6 oa-CL-COL;Mr1s8Fxq 0;Tcowtv.... [2.3.7]Xpoavuoe oof-rop Oo0u•t le i -croaoCfoi ••~TLo0LX0~oYCGqoCV t xorit.As4toC t•h-irCOf. oniro tav 1 xOaCS; hrsL Xl -coat, yuova - to B xob ier epov o6vl 7_otYLesv .... [2.4.1] -cobcdpvqizo pof3•pcts B~es-vt oi r6meo Xatcvtheso;nri 'A0ov& ie~ 6v.... [2.4.5] -6 ~ spoi6v c c Tcf 'AO-qv&; Xcc;Xtv6CtoL 7cp6g oupqotv oa-cv. ;. Or6-upq. the another the one toward Upon leaving agora by road, Sikyon, 7. Powell 1905, p. 53. it is possible to see on the right of the road a temple and a bronze 8. The observationof Frazerin his statue of Apollo and a little further on a fountain named for Glauke. first edition of 1897, basicallyun- For it was into this fountain that she threw herself, as they say, changed in the second edition of 1913, vol. "There is no believing that its water would cure Medea's poisons. Beyond this 3, p. 37, absolutely evidence to what or ratherdeities fountain has also been constructed what is known as the Odeion. deity the temple was dedicated,"and his Beside it is a memorial to the sons of Medea.... In [2.3.7] response omission of any mention of a temple to the god's oracle, they (the Corinthians) established annual sac- and statue of Apollo from his commen- rifices to them and a monument ofTerror was erected. This in fact tary on Pausanias2.3.6 have to be seen in of the fact that he wrote with- still survives to our day, an image of a woman of dreadful appear- light out any referenceto the excavationsof ance.... [2.4.1] Not far from the monument is the Sanctuary of the American School. Athena Chalinitis.... [2.4.5] The Sanctuary of Athena Chalinitis is 9. Reichert-Siidbeck2000, pp. 183- near their theater. 205, has a valuablediscussion of the evidence as it pertainsto the worship This passage follows Pausanias'sdescription of the monuments in the fo- of Apollo at Corinth. rum (2.2.6-3.1) and those along the road leading to the harborof Lechaion 10. We apply this nontechnical, (2.3.2-5). In 2.3.6, he returns to the west end of the forum and leaves on a descriptiveterm to Pausaniasin light of road leading to Sikyon. Here he finds a temple and bronze statue of Apollo the excellent discussionby Jones (2001). APOLLO AND THE ARCHAIC TEMPLE AT CORINTH 403 Figure 1. Plan of Corinth, on the side of the road.A little beyond this is the Fountain of Glauke, ca. A.D.150: A. Fountainof Glauke; right which has survived as the rock-cut structure at A in B. Odeion;C. Theater;D. TempleG; probably prominent 1. The Odeion which is identified, lies E. TempleK; F. PeribolosofApollo; Figure (Fig. 1:B), firmly beyond still on the road toward Another G. Templeof Apollo. C. K.Williams II, Glauke, Sikyon. conspicuous structure, CorinthExcavations the theater (Fig. 1:C), indicates that all the monuments described in this passage by Pausanias must have been located between it and the gate by which he leaves the northwest corner of the forum. Convincing identifica- tions for the memorial to Medea's children, the statue of Terror, and the Sanctuary of Athena Chalinitis have yet to be established, although many theories have been proposed." We return to this passage below. Further evidence for an image of Apollo in Roman Corinth is pro- vided by Pausanias in 2.2.8, where he mentions a statue of KlarianApollo in the forum near a fountain of Poseidon. A possible representationof this statue exists on a coin of Septimius Severus from Corinth.12 The proto- type of the god seated, semidraped, on a throne with his lyre next to him 11. For the mnema,see Anth. Pal. chora,we preferto follow the view of Jones (2003) has well explainedthem, 7.354. For an introductionto the Papachatzis(1976, p. 75), that Pausa- we are not preparedto follow Osanna problemsof the monument of Medea's nias'sverb e'reCo (2.3.7) ties the (2001, p. 198), who rejectsthe seven children and the statue of Terror,with statue to the mnemat.le that is located next topographicdesignations in this citation of sourcesand earlierbibliogra- to the Odeion and not far from the passage and arguesthat the organizing phy, see Johnston 1997, who, however, Sanctuaryof Athena Chalinitis. On principle here is a kind of thematic errs in stating (pp. 46, 48) that Pausa- the latter,see Novaro-Lefevre2000, associationof legends ratherthan "una nias placed these monuments "in the pp. 60-62. On the mnema,see also guida, topograficamentecoerente." agora."Regarding her proposal(pp. 49, Bookidis, forthcoming. 12. Imhoof-Blumer and Gardner 60) that the statue of Terrorstood in While alert to recent interest in 1964, p. 156, no. 25, pl. FF:14. the Sanctuaryof Hera Akraia in Pera- Pausanias's"principles of choice,"as 404 NANCY BOOKIDIS AND RONALD S. STROUD apparentlygoes back to the first half of the second century B.C.13Flashar's association of a corresponding figure on Augustan monuments celebrat- ing the victory at Actium might give some support for an Augustan date for the statue at Corinth. In his suggestion that this statue was housed in Temple G (Fig. 1:D), Charles K. Williams II definitely set it in the Ro- man period.14Scranton attempted to place the statue of Apollo Klarios in Temple K (Fig. 1:E), which he then identified as the Temple of Apollo from Pausanias2.3.6 (see below, p. 414).15A connection between Corinth and the Oracle of Apollo at Klarosis attested in an inscription from Klaros that records a delegation of 10 Corinthian hymnodoisent to Klaros in the reign of Hadrian.16It is important to distinguish the small Roman temple in Pausanias's agora that housed the statue of Apollo Klarios from the Temple of Apollo in 2.3.6 that stood outside the agora on the right side of the road leading toward Sikyon.
Recommended publications
  • Pantheon Piazza Della Rotonda, 00186 Near Piazza Novanametro: 9 AM – 7:30 PM (Mon – Sat)
    Pantheon Piazza della Rotonda, 00186 Near Piazza NovanaMetro: 9 AM – 7:30 PM (Mon – Sat) 9 AM – 6 PM (Sunday) The Roman Pantheon is the most preserved and influential building of ancient Rome. It is a Roman temple dedicated to all the gods of pagan Rome. As the brick stamps on the side of the building reveal it was built and dedicated between A.D 118 and 125. The emperor Hadrian (A.D 117-138) built the Pantheon to replace Augustus’ friend and Commander Marcus Agrippa’s Pantheon of 27 B.C. which burnt to the ground in 80 A.D. When approaching the front of the Pantheon one can see the inscription above still reads in Latin the original dedication by Marcus Agrippa. The inscription reads: "M. AGRIPPA.L.F.COSTERTIUM.FECIT” “Marcus Agrippa son of Lucius, having been consul three times made it”. Despite all the marvelous building projects that the emperor Hadrian produced during his reign, he never inscribed his name to any, but one, the temple of his father Trajan. That is why the Roman Pantheon bears the inscription of Marcus Agrippa, and not the emperor Hadrian. The pediment (the triangle section above the inscription) is blank today, but there would have been sculpture that acted out the battle of the Titans. Great bronze doors guard the entrance to the cella and would have been covered in gold, but it has long since disappeared. The original use of the Pantheon is somewhat unknown, except that is was classified as a temple. However, it is unknown as to how the people worshipped in the building, because the structure of the temple is so different from other traditional Roman temples such as in the Roman Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • And Rome's Legacies
    Christianity AND ROME’S LEGACIES Old Religions New Testament MARK MAKES HIS MARK NOT SO SIMPLE TEMPLES IN PARTNERSHIP WITH christianity_FC.indd 1 3/6/17 3:32 PM 2 Religions in Rome The earliest Romans saw their gods as spirits or powerful forces of nature. These gods did not have personalities or emotions or act in any other way like human beings. However, as Rome began to build an empire, the Romans were exposed to new ideas. Through contact with the Greeks, the Romans’ idea of gods and goddesses changed. The Greeks believed in gods and god- desses who behaved very much like human beings. Their gods could be jeal- ous, angry, passionate, kind, foolish, or petty. The Romans borrowed this idea u THE ROMANS People did not go to and honey, burned honored their gods a temple to worship sweet-smelling from the Greeks. They even borrowed by building temples. the god. Rather, a incense, and sac- some of the Greek gods and goddesses. Inside each temple temple was where rificed animals to No longer were the Roman gods spir- was a statue of a priests made honor the god. god or goddess. offerings of cakes its or forces of nature. They were now divine and human at the same time. u UNTIL THE in private people 300s CE, the Roman were free to think u THE ROMANS wisdom. During festival day, priests ticular, no legal religion was a and say what they honored their gods Cerealia, Romans performed rituals work was allowed. state religion. wanted to. Over with more than 100 honored the god- and sacrifices Celebrations includ- The emperor was time, the emperor festivals every year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Higher Aspects of Greek Religion. Lectures Delivered at Oxford and In
    BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIET OF Henirg m. Sage 1891 .A^^^ffM3. islm^lix.. 5931 CornelJ University Library BL 25.H621911 The higher aspects of Greek religion.Lec 3 1924 007 845 450 The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924007845450 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES 1911 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES THE HIGHER ASPECTS OF GREEK RELIGION LECTURES DELIVERED AT OXFORD AND IN LONDON IN APRIL AND MAY igii BY L. R. FARNELL, D.Litt. WILDE LECTURER IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD LONDON WILLIAMS AND NORGATE GARDEN, W.C. 14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT 1912 CONTENTS Lecture I GENERAL FEATURES AND ORIGINS OF GREEK RELIGION Greek religion mainly a social-political system, 1. In its earliest " period a " theistic creed, that is^ a worship of personal individual deities, ethical personalities rather than mere nature forces, 2. Anthrqgomorphism its predominant bias, 2-3. Yet preserving many primitive features of " animism " or " animatism," 3-5. Its progress gradual without violent break with its distant past, 5-6. The ele- ment of magic fused with the religion but not predominant, 6-7. Hellenism and Hellenic religion a blend of two ethnic strains, one North-Aryan, the other Mediterranean, mainly Minoan-Mycenaean, 7-9. Criteria by which we can distinguish the various influences of these two, 9-1 6. The value of Homeric evidence, 18-20. Sum- mary of results, 21-24. Lecture II THE RELIGIOUS BOND AND MORALITY OF THE FAMILY The earliest type of family in Hellenic society patrilinear, 25-27.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Pantheon Through Time Caitlin Williams
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2018 A Study of the Pantheon Through Time Caitlin Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Caitlin, "A Study of the Pantheon Through Time" (2018). Honors Theses. 1689. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/1689 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Study of the Pantheon Through Time By Caitlin Williams * * * * * * * Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of Classics UNION COLLEGE June, 2018 ABSTRACT WILLIAMS, CAITLIN A Study of the Pantheon Through Time. Department of Classics, June, 2018. ADVISOR: Hans-Friedrich Mueller. I analyze the Pantheon, one of the most well-preserVed buildings from antiquity, through time. I start with Agrippa's Pantheon, the original Pantheon that is no longer standing, which was built in 27 or 25 BC. What did it look like originally under Augustus? Why was it built? We then shift to the Pantheon that stands today, Hadrian-Trajan's Pantheon, which was completed around AD 125-128, and represents an example of an architectural reVolution. Was it eVen a temple? We also look at the Pantheon's conversion to a church, which helps explain why it is so well preserVed.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMAN ARCHITEXTURE: the IDEA of the MONUMENT in the ROMAN IMAGINATION of the AUGUSTAN AGE by Nicholas James Geller a Dissertatio
    ROMAN ARCHITEXTURE: THE IDEA OF THE MONUMENT IN THE ROMAN IMAGINATION OF THE AUGUSTAN AGE by Nicholas James Geller A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Basil J. Dufallo, Chair Associate Professor Ruth Rothaus Caston Professor Bruce W. Frier Associate Professor Achim Timmermann ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of many people both within and outside of academia. I would first of all like to thank all those on my committee for reading drafts of my work and providing constructive feedback, especially Basil Dufallo and Ruth R. Caston, both of who read my chapters at early stages and pushed me to find what I wanted to say – and say it well. I also cannot thank enough all the graduate students in the Department of Classical Studies at the University of Michigan for their support and friendship over the years, without either of which I would have never made it this far. Marin Turk in Slavic Languages and Literature deserves my gratitude, as well, for reading over drafts of my chapters and providing insightful commentary from a non-classicist perspective. And I of course must thank the Department of Classical Studies and Rackham Graduate School for all the financial support that I have received over the years which gave me time and the peace of mind to develop my ideas and write the dissertation that follows. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………ii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………………iv ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………....v CHAPTER I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pantheon (Temple of All the Gods)
    The Pantheon (temple of all the gods) is a former Roman temple and since the year 609 a Catholic church in Rome, Italy, on the site of an earlier temple commissioned by Marcus Agrippa during the reign of Augustus (27 BC – 14 AD). It was rebuilt by the emperor Hadrian and probably dedicated 126 AD. Its date of construction is uncertain, because Hadrian chose not to inscribe the new temple but rather to retain the inscription of Agrippa's older temple, which had burned down. The building is cylindrical with a portico of large granite Corinthian columns (eight in the first rank and two groups of four behind) under a pediment. A rectangular vestibule links the porch to the rotunda, which is under a coffered concrete dome, with a central opening (oculus) to the sky. Almost two thousand years after it was built, the Pantheon's dome is still the world's largest unreinforced concrete dome. The height to the oculus and the diameter of the interior circle are the same, 142 feet. It is one of the best-preserved of all Ancient Roman buildings, in large part because it has been in continuous use throughout its history and, since the 7th century, the Pantheon has been in use as a church dedicated to "St. Mary and the Martyrs" but informally known as "Santa Maria Rotonda". The square in front of the Pantheon is called Piazza della Rotonda. The Pantheon is a state property, managed by Italy's Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities and Tourism. In 2013, it was visited by over 6 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome
    HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY Ancient Julius Caesar Rome Reader Caesar Augustus The Second Punic War Cleopatra THIS BOOK IS THE PROPERTY OF: STATE Book No. PROVINCE Enter information COUNTY in spaces to the left as PARISH instructed. SCHOOL DISTRICT OTHER CONDITION Year ISSUED TO Used ISSUED RETURNED PUPILS to whom this textbook is issued must not write on any page or mark any part of it in any way, consumable textbooks excepted. 1. Teachers should see that the pupil’s name is clearly written in ink in the spaces above in every book issued. 2. The following terms should be used in recording the condition of the book: New; Good; Fair; Poor; Bad. Ancient Rome Reader Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free: to Share—to copy, distribute, and transmit the work to Remix—to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution—You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation (www.coreknowledge.org) made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial—You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike—If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus As a Case of Etruscan Influence on Roman Religious Architec
    HPS: The Journal of History & Political Science 5 Caput Mundi: An Analysis of the HPS: The Journal of History & Political Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus Science 2017, Vol. 5 1-12 as a Case of Etruscan Influence on © The Author(s) 2017 Roman Religious Architecture Mario Concordia York University, Canada While Roman architecture is often generalized as being primarily of Greek influence, there are important periods where other influences can be clearly identified. This paper considers the Etruscan, Greek, and Villanovan influence on Roman religious architecture through an examination of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maxmius, also known as the Capitolium, and argues that the temple is ultimately of primarily Etruscan influence. Introduction Religious temple architecture was a dynamic, evolving tradition throughout the entire span of Roman history. From its founding, customarily dated at 753 BCE with the mythical tale of Romulus and Remus, until the eventual fall of the Western Empire in the 5th century CE, temples were a central piece of the majesty of Roman architecture. But, like all construction fashion, what was dominant and popular in one period would inevitably change over time. As Becker indicates in his work, “Italic Architecture of the Earlier First Millennium BCE,” many scholars believe that Roman temple architecture is completely indebted to Greek advancements and influence, and that historians should be looking at Classic Greek models when considering Roman architecture,1 but this is hardly a complete answer. While it is true that Rome began to steer toward a more Hellenistic aesthetic some time around the Late Republic to Early Empire Period, there is an entire period before that which cannot be understood in this simple way.
    [Show full text]
  • Philokleon's Court
    PHILOKLEON'SCOURT (PLATE 32) - . GO KaOCECo-avr?wv Oapp&v KbTEV- KOPT5AIO0 oV'8EIJirwEtcrW p,Mq8E'v &Et &XX' 3XrTW-(TE (a,.EvoL rott TrarpcpotL OEO'TLV. NDIAOKAES2N - c AvKE 8&r7oroma, YELTCOV -qpCo0 0v yap OLO7TEp E)'W KEXap??loFa rOUt& &aKpV-OLftV TCOVVckovYVTcov aIE KaL Tots o0Xovpp/.LOZ*K71)aaS Y7v E7lrt7r?8E Ka3OVX j ov EvTavOra vwa ravr aKpOqO 7 pvc Trapa rov KXaovTa ~ ~ a OX OVVV TOVqOa1YOt) 7cOVO ~T' TL"wov KX1J7 T KaO7TaOa. EXEaOV7T)toxopov7Tcooov Kat vvt rov KOVuavrov TOTE (0OV lrapa TaS Kavvas OVp?)cT) fUq8 aITro7rap&o. Aristophanes, Wasps, 387-394 T is possiblethat a topographicalreference can be enucleatedfrom Philokleon's prayer, but first the currents of humor in these lines must be charted and reliable elements in traditional " information " about Lykos isolated. This essay is divided into three sections: 1) an analysis of ancient reports concerning Lykos, 2) an inter- pretation of Aristophanes, Wasps, 387-394, 3) a suggestion as to the location of Philokleon's law court. LYKOS Although the name was not rare, the particular Lykos of Aristophanes, Wasps, 387-394 has not been plausibly identified with any of the rivers, heroes or mortals who were also called Lykos.' In fact, despite the elaborations of scholarship, early and late, almost everything that can confidently be said of him has its source in the lines quoted at the head of this paper. From these lines, we can extract the following information: 1) Lykos is a hero, 2) his heroon is in or near a law court, and 3) his ' Under the heading " Lykos " in R.E., 1927, cols.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divinity of Hellenistic Rulers
    OriginalverCORE öffentlichung in: A. Erskine (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World,Metadata, Oxford: Blackwell citation 2003, and similar papers at core.ac.uk ProvidedS. 431-445 by Propylaeum-DOK CHAPTKR TWENTY-FIVE The Divinity of Hellenistic Rulers Anßdos Chaniotis 1 Introduction: the Paradox of Mortal Divinity When King Demetrios Poliorketes returned to Athens from Kerkyra in 291, the Athenians welcomed him with a processional song, the text of which has long been recognized as one of the most interesting sources for Hellenistic ruler cult: How the greatest and dearest of the gods have come to the city! For the hour has brought together Demeter and Demetrios; she comes to celebrate the solemn mysteries of the Kore, while he is here füll of joy, as befits the god, fair and laughing. His appearance is majestic, his friends all around him and he in their midst, as though they were stars and he the sun. Hail son of the most powerful god Poseidon and Aphrodite. (Douris FGrH76 Fl3, cf. Demochares FGrH75 F2, both at Athen. 6.253b-f; trans. as Austin 35) Had only the first lines of this ritual song survived, the modern reader would notice the assimilaüon of the adventus of a mortal king with that of a divinity, the etymo- logical association of his name with that of Demeter, the parentage of mighty gods, and the external features of a divine ruler (joy, beauty, majesty). Very often scholars reach their conclusions about aspects of ancient mentality on the basis of a fragment; and very often - unavoidably - they conceive only a fragment of reality.
    [Show full text]
  • THIASOS Rivista Di Archeologia E Architettura Antica
    THIASOS rivista di archeologia e architettura antica 2020, n. 9.2 IN SOLO PROVINCIALI Sull’architettura delle province, da Augusto ai Severi, tra inerzie locali e romanizzazione a cura di Giuseppe Mazzilli «THIASOS» Rivista di archeologia e architettura antica Direttore: Giorgio Rocco Comitato di Direzione: Monica Livadiotti (vice-Direttore), Roberta Belli Pasqua, Luigi Maria Caliò Redazione: Davide Falco, Antonello Fino, Chiara Giatti, Antonella Lepone, Giuseppe Mazzilli, Valeria Parisi, Rita Sassu Anno di fondazione: 2011 Alka Starac, The Oldest Forum Temple of Pola. A New Approach Il contenuto risponde alle norme della legislazione italiana in materia di proprietà intellettuale ed è di proprietà esclusiva dell'Editore ed è soggetta a copyright. Le opere che figurano nel sito possono essere consultate e riprodotte su supporto cartaceo o elettronico con la riserva che l'uso sia strettamente personale, sia scientifico che didattico, escludendo qualsiasi uso di tipo commerciale. La riproduzione e la citazione dovranno obbligatoriamente menzionare l'editore, il nome della rivista, l'autore e il riferimento al documento. Qualsiasi altro tipo di riproduzione è vietato, salvo accordi preliminari con l'Editore. Edizioni Quasar di Severino Tognon s.r.l., via Ajaccio 41-43, 00198 Roma (Italia) http://www.edizioniquasar.it/ ISSN 2279-7297 Tutti i diritti riservati Come citare l'articolo: A. Starac, The Oldest Forum Temple of Pola. A New Approach, in G. Mazzilli (a cura di), In solo provinciali, Sull’architettura delle province, da Augusto ai Severi, tra inerzie locali e romanizzazione, Thiasos 9.2, 2020, pp. 19-32. Gli articoli pubblicati nella Rivista sono sottoposti a referee nel sistema a doppio cieco.
    [Show full text]
  • Paganism in the Roman Church
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by OpenSIUC ^be ©pen Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE 2)evote& to tbe Science ot IReltgton, tbe IReU^ton of Science, ant) tbe Bxtensfon ot tbe "Keligious jparltament ITDea Editor: Dr. Paul Carus, ^- ^- Heoblbr. • J Assoda t es. -i^ Asiittant Editor: T. J. McCormack. Mary Carus. VOL. XIII. (no. 6) June, 1899. NO. 517 CONTENTS: Frontispiece. Condorcet. Paganism in the Roman Church. The Rev. Th. Trede, Pastor of the Evan- gelical Church of Naples . , 321 French Philosophy at the End of the Eighteenth Century— Condorcet. Prof. L. L6vy-Bruhl, Maitre de Conferences at the Sorbonne, Paris . 340 Intermediate Forms of Abstraction. A Study in the Evolution of General Ideas. Th. Ribot, Editor of the Revue Philosophique and Professor in the College de France, Paris 349 Peace on Earth. A Problem of Practical Diplomacy. A Suggestion to the Members of the International Peace Commission. Editor . 360 Plato and the Cross. With Illustrations. Editor 364 Internat'ional Good- Will. 373 The Filipino Question 375 Henry Clarke Warren. Obituary 376 Manilal N. Dvivedi. Obituary 378 A Further Note on the Buddhist Nativity Sutta 379 A Practical Introduction to English Literature 380 Book Reviews, Notes, etc 380 CHICAGO ®be ©pen Court publisbing Companie LONDON : Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Single copies, 10 cent^ (6d.). Annually, $1.00. in the U. P. U., 5s. 6d. Copyright. 1899, by Tbe Op«n Court Poblishinj; Co. Bantered at the CbicaKO Post Office as Second-Class Matter. Jp^ : ^be ©pen Gourt A MONTHLY MAGAZINE 2)evotc& to tbe Science of IReltgton, tbe IReliGton ot Science, an^ tbe Bitension ot tbe IReligious parliament 1[C)ea Editor: Dr.
    [Show full text]