DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Public Transportation Authority Scottsdale Road/Rural

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Public Transportation Authority Scottsdale Road/Rural Regional Public Transportation Authority Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis Study Draft Final Report Prepared for: RPTA Prepared by: In Association with: URS Corporation March, 2011 Draft Final Report Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis Study March 2011 Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Problem Definition .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Background ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Study Corridor ................................................................................................. 1 1.1.3 Study Objectives .............................................................................................. 3 1.2 Previous Planning for the Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Corridor ............................................ 3 1.3 Existing Transportation Conditions and Future Changes ...................................................... 5 1.3.1 Roadway System .............................................................................................. 5 1.3.2 Existing Average Daily Traffic ............................................................................. 5 1.3.3 Level of Service ................................................................................................ 7 1.4 Existing Fixed Transit Routes and Services ........................................................................ 7 1.5 Transit Passenger Facilities ........................................................................................... 16 1.6 Demand Responsive Transit .......................................................................................... 16 1.7 Current and Short-Term Transit Deficiencies ................................................................... 16 1.8 Bicycle and Pedestrian Ways ......................................................................................... 19 1.9 Programmed and Planned Improvements ....................................................................... 19 1.9.1 Current Capital Improvement Programs ............................................................. 19 1.9.2 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) ................................................ 22 1.9.3 Planned RTP Transit Improvements ................................................................... 23 1.9.4 Other Planned and Proposed Improvements ....................................................... 24 1.10 Land Use and Community Development ......................................................................... 24 1.10.1 Existing Land Use Characteristics ...................................................................... 24 1.10.2 Zoning .......................................................................................................... 24 1.10.3 Planned Land Use Characteristics ...................................................................... 24 1.10.4 Transit-Oriented Development Plans and Policies ................................................. 28 1.10.5 Activity Centers and Development Proposals ....................................................... 29 1.11 Transit Demand Indicators ........................................................................................... 29 1.11.1 Population and Employment ............................................................................. 29 1.11.2 Existing Ridership Characteristics and Trends ...................................................... 36 1.12 Issues, Opportunities and Constraints ............................................................................ 40 Chapter 2 - Travel Demand Characteristics and Forecasts ....................................................... 42 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 42 2.2 MAG 2030 Regional Travel Demand Model ...................................................................... 42 2.2.1 2030 No-Build Roadway Network Assumptions .................................................... 43 2.2.2 2030 No-Build Roadway Travel Forecasts ........................................................... 43 2.2.3 2030 No-Build Transit Network Assumptions ....................................................... 43 2.2.4 MAG 2030 No-Build Transit Travel Forecasts ....................................................... 45 2.2.5 MAG 2030 No-Build Route 72 Demand Characteristics .......................................... 45 2.3 Regional Transit Framework Study (MAG) ....................................................................... 47 2.4 ASU Travel Demand Analysis (METRO) ........................................................................... 48 Page i Draft Final Report Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis Study March 2011 2.5 RPTA Origin-Destination Studies .................................................................................... 49 2.6 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................... 50 Chapter 3 - Purpose and Need ................................................................................................. 51 3.1 Statement of Purpose .................................................................................................. 51 3.2 Need for the Proposed Project ....................................................................................... 51 Chapter 4 - Development of Transit Investment Alternatives .................................................. 53 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 53 4.2 Proposed Corridor Segments ......................................................................................... 53 4.2.1 Detailed Corridor Schematics ............................................................................ 56 4.3 Three Dimensions of Potential Transit Investments .......................................................... 56 4.3.1 Possible Transit Modes ..................................................................................... 58 4.3.2 Alternatives for Sharing Lanes and On-Street Placement ...................................... 60 4.4 Results of Multi-Agency Alternatives Workshop: June 15, 2010 ......................................... 61 4.5 Proposed Corridor-Length Alternatives for Evaluation ....................................................... 64 4.5.1 Community Meetings (First Round) .................................................................... 66 4.6 Refinements to Alternatives .......................................................................................... 68 4.6.1 Proposed Locations for Bus Stops or Stations ...................................................... 68 4.6.2 Candidate Intersections for Queue Jumpers and Signal Prioritization ...................... 73 4.7 Travel Time Savings Analysis ........................................................................................ 76 4.7.1 Baseline Condition .......................................................................................... 76 4.7.2 Alternative 1 – Limited Stop Bus ....................................................................... 77 4.7.3 Alternative 2 – BRT with Shared Lanes............................................................... 77 4.7.4 Alternative 3a, 3b, 3c – BRT with BAT Lanes ....................................................... 77 4.7.5 Alternative 4 – Exclusive Median Transit Lanes .................................................... 77 4.7.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 77 Chapter 5 - Evaluation of Transit Investment Alternatives ...................................................... 80 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 80 5.1.1 Alternatives ................................................................................................... 80 5.2 Evaluation Methodology ............................................................................................... 81 5.2.1 Tier 1 Evaluation Methodology .......................................................................... 81 5.2.2 Tier 2 Evaluation Methodology .......................................................................... 82 5.3 Evaluation of Alternatives ............................................................................................. 86 5.3.1 Tier 1 Evaluation ............................................................................................ 86 5.3.2 Tier 2 Evaluation ............................................................................................ 86 5.4 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................. 101 5.4.1 Conclusions .................................................................................................. 101 5.4.2 Study Recommendations ................................................................................ 102 Chapter 6 - Project Finance ................................................................................................... 104 6.1 Federal Funding for Capital Costs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ED439719.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 439 719 IR 057 813 AUTHOR McCleary, Linda C., Ed. TITLE Read from Sea to Shining Sea. Arizona Reading Program. Program Manual. INSTITUTION Arizona Humanities Council, Phoenix.; Arizona State Dept. of Library, Archives and Public Records, Phoenix. PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 414p. PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC17 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Cooperative Programs; Games; Learning Activities; *Library Planning; Library Services; *Reading Motivation; *Reading Programs; State Programs; Youth Programs IDENTIFIERS *Arizona ABSTRACT This year is the first for the collaborative effort between the Arizona Department of Library, Archives and Public Records, and Arizona Humanities Council and the members of the Arizona Reads Committee. This Arizona Reading Program manual contains information on program planning and development, along with crafts, activity sheets, fingerplays, songs, games and puzzles, and bibliographies grouped in age specific sections for preschool children through young adults, including a section for those with special needs. The manual is divided into the following sections: Introductory Materials; Goals, Objectives and Evaluation; Getting Started; Common Program Structures; Planning Timeline; Publicity and Promotion; Awards and Incentives; Parents/Family Involvement; Programs for Preschoolers; Programs for School Age Children; Programs for Young Adults; Special Needs; Selected Bibliography; Resources; Resource People; and Miscellaneous materials.(AEF) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. rn C21 Read from Sea to Shining Sea Arizona Reading Program Program Manual By Linda C. McCleary, Ed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND Office of Educational Research and Improvement DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION BEEN GRANTED BY CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization Ann-Mary Johnson originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context: a Modern Dynamic City – Scottsdale City Planning, Public Buildings and Development, 1961‐1979
    Approved 11/8/12 by HPC; Revised 12/19/12 Historic Context: A Modern Dynamic City – Scottsdale City Planning, Public Buildings and Development, 1961‐1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 NATIONAL TRENDS 1 DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC TRENDS 2 MAJOR FEDERAL LAWS AND POLICIES FROM THE ERA 5 SUPREME COURT DECISIONS WITH MAJOR IMPACTS 10 Public School Decisions 10 Other Important Cases on Segregation and Rights 11 MAJOR POLITICAL GROUPS AND WELL‐KNOWN NATIONAL MOVEMENTS 12 Civil Rights Movement 12 Anti‐War Protests and Peace Movement 13 Women’s Movement 14 Conservative Political Movement 15 Counter‐Cultural Movement and Hippies 16 Urban Race Riots of the 1960s 17 Extremist Groups 17 Environmental Movement 18 Modern Architecture Movement 19 COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES INCLUDING PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS 21 ARIZONA AND REGIONAL TRENDS IMPACTING SCOTTSDALE 23 RAPID GROWTH IN THE REGION 23 BLACKS, HISPANICS AND NATIVE AMERICANS IN THE METRO AREA 24 RACE AND CIVIL RIGHTS IN ARIZONA AND PHOENIX 26 DEMAND FOR WATER AND FLOODING PROBLEMS 27 DECLINE OF PHOENIX’S CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT BY THE STUDY ERA 28 SCOTTSDALE TRENDS AND MAJOR PUBLIC DEVELOPMENTS FROM 1961‐1979 28 CIVIC CENTER MALL AND GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT 29 PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33 ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 37 ANNEXATIONS 38 INDIAN BEND WASH 41 MCCORMICK‐STILLMAN RAILROAD PARK 43 SCOTTSDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 44 PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN THE SCOTTSDALE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 46 APPENDICES 48 A. TIMELINE OF MAJOR EVENTS FROM 1961‐1979 48 B. SIGNIFICANT PEOPLE IN THE NEWS AND THEIR PUBLICATIONS 51 REFERENCES FOR A MODERN DYNAMIC CITY 54 A Modern Dynamic City – Scottsdale City Planning, Public Buildings and Development, 1961‐1979 Prepared by Don Meserve, Historic Preservation Officer, City of Scottsdale, 2012 INTRODUCTION This historic context describes a very important era in our nation’s history for the emerging modern dynamic city of Scottsdale, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Scottsdale Page 1 of 90 April 14, 2015 Regular Council Meeting Closed Caption Transcript
    CITY OF SCOTTSDALE PAGE 1 OF 90 APRIL 14, 2015 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CLOSED CAPTION TRANSCRIPT This document was created from the closed caption transcript of the April 14, 2015 City Council Regular Meeting and has not been checked for completeness or accuracy of content. A copy of the agenda for this meeting, including a summary of the action taken on each agenda item, is available online at: http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/Assets/Public+Website/council/Council+Documents/2015+Agendas/0414 15RegularAgenda.pdf An unedited digital video recording of the meeting, which can be used in conjunction with the transcript, is available online at: http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/citycable11/channels/council15 . For ease of reference, included throughout the transcript are bracketed “time stamps” [Time: 00:00:00] that correspond to digital video recording time. For more information about this transcript, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 480-312-2411. CALL TO ORDER [Time: 00:00:02] Mayor Lane: Good afternoon. I would like to call to order the April 14th, 2015 City Council meeting. We'll start with a roll call, please. ROLL CALL [Time: 00:00:08] City Clerk Carolyn Jagger: Mayor Jim Lane. Mayor Lane: Present. City Clerk Carolyn Jagger: Vice Mayor Linda Milhaven. Vice Mayor Milhaven: Here. City Clerk Carolyn Jagger: Councilmember Suzanne Klapp. Councilwoman Klapp: Here. City Clerk Carolyn Jagger: Virginia Korte. CITY OF SCOTTSDALE PAGE 2 OF 90 APRIL 14, 2015 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CLOSED CAPTION TRANSCRIPT Councilmember Korte: Here. City Clerk Carolyn Jagger: Kathy Littlefield. Councilwoman Littlefield: Here. City Clerk Carolyn Jagger: Guy Phillips.
    [Show full text]
  • September 1974
    ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY September 1974 An Employment Security Publication PREFACE The purpose and objective of this semiannual publication is to provide useful economic and manpower information on the Phoenix Area (Maricopa County) to business and government decision-makers, and to the general public. This report covers developments for the area as a whole, and for specific sections within the area. Your cornments and suggestions are invited so that we may make any improvements that our readers feel are essential. Letters and comments may be addressed to: Phoenix Area Manpower Review, Research and Statistics Bureau, P.O. Box 6l23, Phoenix, Arizona 85005. ' .} HIGHLIGHTS Since the 1970 census, Maricopa County's population has increased by 21% to an estimated 1,173,000. (See Pages 2 and 27.) The Phoenix area civilian labor force reached 503,600 in July; the labor force participation rate declined for the first time in 12 years. (See Pages 5 and 26.) Manufacturing and trade industries continue as the area's major employers, ac­ counting for nearly half the total nonagricultural wage and salary employment. (See Pages 5 and 6.) Federal Manpower programs are being decentralized and decategorized under the recently enacted Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA). As of this date, almost $9,700,000 has been granted to Maricopa County and the City of Phoenix, (See Pages 7 and 8,) The economic outlook for the Phoenix area calls for a continued slow upward move­ ment for the rest of the year. (See Page 11.) Twenty-two building business activities announced or started during the first six months of 1974 are listed on Page 12.
    [Show full text]
  • January 14, 2021
    January 14, 2021 Dear Reader, In 2004, Arizona State University was actively Foundation recognized the importance of a long- seeking a location where the university could term, fully vested real estate expert, and selected make its technology commercialization and Arizona firm Plaza Companies as the master entrepreneurial efforts more accessible to local and developer. The Plaza relationship grew to that of an global markets. The goal was unique in academic investor and managing member as the team moved circles. The university actively sought opportunities forward to revitalize the corner of Scottsdale and to advance discovery and favorably impact the McDowell roads. economic well-being of the region through Today, 16 years after the initial partnership, integrated collaborations with private industry. SkySong has become one of the major economic At the same time, the City of Scottsdale was engines in the Greater Phoenix area. With nearly searching for community benefiting redevelopment 850,000 sq. ft. of office buildings, housing and concepts for a failed mall site in the heart of the parking decks developed and near full capacity; city. To pursue both mission-driven objectives, the more than 3,000 people are employed by the more university and the City of Scottsdale partnered with than 50 businesses at SkySong. When completed, the ASU Foundation and its real estate affiliate, the 40-acre mixed-use development will include University Realty LLC, to create SkySong, The ASU more than 1.3 million sq. ft. of office buildings, Scottsdale Innovation Center. ASU and the ASU retail, hotels, and apartments. To measure the community benefit achieved thus far, University Realty, LLC and the Plaza Companies engaged Elliott D.
    [Show full text]
  • AHS-Ephemera Collection
    TITLE: Arizona Historical Society – Papago Park Ephemera Collection DATE RANGE: Territorial Arizona – present CALL NUMBER: PP-EPH PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 135 linear feet (216 document boxes; 8 flat file drawers) PROVENANCE: From 2012-2014 all ephemeral and vertical file materials from multiple donors and locations were evaluated and consolidated to form a unified ephemera collection that could grow into the future. Recognition should be given to the thousands of donors and thousands of volunteer hours who collected and organized these materials. COPYRIGHT: Copyright varies RESTRICTIONS: None CREDIT LINE: Ephemera Collection, PP-EPH, Box/Folder #, Arizona Historical Society – Papago Park PROCESSED BY: Michelle Bickert, 2012-2014; updated 2018 HISTORICAL NOTE: The Ephemera Collection is an active, artificial collection featuring donations from multiple sources. The Ephemera Files donated to AHS by the Arizona Historical Foundation (AHF) comprise the core of this collection. Files from the AHS vertical files and Small Manuscripts collection were integrated during the process of removing duplicates, combining files, and evaluating the physical condition of these materials. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE: The Ephemera Collection is the largest ready reference collection in the AHS-Papago Park archives, containing approximately ten thousand items. Ephemeral materials were created for immediate rather than long-term use such as pamphlets, brochures, advertisements. It represents a wide range of social, economic, cultural and ethnic communities reflecting the spectrum of human activity, past and present, with an emphasis on mid-20th century Phoenix. The folder contents vary widely between one document and several. The files contain both primary and secondary sources, originals and photocopies, including but not limited to: newspaper clippings, programs, reports, fliers, promotional materials, tickets, brochures, advertisements, and articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Speaker's Bios Here
    David Bentler Manager, Statewide Economic Development Department Arizona Public Service David Bentler is the Manager of the APS Statewide Economic Development Department. David believes strongly in the “Arizona Team” concept: working in unity with all Arizona economic development organizations such as Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA), Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC), and other public and private economic development agencies towards the common goal of the recruitment of quality jobs into Arizona. David received his Bachelor and Master degree from Truman State and is a graduate of the Economic Development Institute in Norman, Oklahoma. David is Past President of the Electric Utilities Economic Development Association (UEDA), on the Board of Directors for the Economic Collaborative of Northern Arizona (ECONA), on the Board of Directors for the Scottsdale Area Chamber of Commerce, and Past President for the Arizona Association for Economic Development (AAED) and on the Board of Directors for Pinal Alliance for Economic Development. He was honored by AAED as the Arizona Economic Developer of the year in 2003, received the Distinguished Service Award from GPEC in 2009, and in 2016 was honored with the William Lampkin Long Term Excellence in Economic Development Award. Aric H. Bopp, CEcD Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Office of Economic Development City of Mesa, AZ Aric Bopp joined the City of Mesa in August of 2016 as the Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives in the Office of Economic Development. One of his major roles is to help develop the Gateway region of Mesa that includes Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport, ASU-Poly, and approximately thirty-two square miles of development potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Mesa Strategic Development Plan Mesa, Arizona
    Southeast Mesa Strategic Development Plan Mesa, Arizona Current Trends Economic Base Memorandum Prepared For: The City of Mesa Prepared By: Elliott D. Pollack & Company 7505 East Sixth Avenue, Suite 100 Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 In Partnership With: Lee & Associates October 2007 Task 2d: Current Trends Economic Base Memorandum TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary i 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Regional Demographics and Economic Outlook 6 3.0 General Commercial Market Trends – Metro Phoenix 23 4.0 Local Competition for Business Locations 56 5.0 Examples of Development Sequencing 81 6.0 Perceptions of the Development Community 97 7.0 Analysis of Reliever Airports 105 8.0 Summary and Conclusions 121 TOC Task 2d: Current Trends Economic Base Memorandum Executive Summary Elliott D. Pollack & Company has been retained to provide an economic evaluation of the development potential of the area surrounding Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport in Mesa, Arizona. The study area that is the focus of this analysis is referred to as the Land Use Evaluation Area and includes approximately 33 square miles of land. Because of its large scale, the implementation of a successful development plan will be of benefit not just to the City of Mesa residents, but to the broader region as well. Analytical Framework This analysis begins with a macroeconomic assessment of the overall commercial real estate market in Metro Phoenix. The study then narrows in focus and includes an evaluation of recently released population and employment projections from the Maricopa Association of Governments on the more proximate region. This analysis concludes with the development of alternative scenarios of growth in the Southeast Valley and, more specifically, to the market area surrounding Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Lesbian List (ALL)
    r W omen’s C entral N ews ’náb U&4biCm dew ípúper NUM BER 3 VOLUM E XXVII April 1999 W CN’s Last Issue A M essage From the President Dear Friends: The Women’s Center, Inc. became a non-profit corporation in 1973 and, with a physical space, served mainly as an information and referral service for women. In 1977 they began to publish a newsletter to assist in providing out-reach to low income and working class women. In 1984 their physical space closed but the newsletter continued. Since then a large number of volunteer women have worked tirelessly to make the Women’s Center, Inc. newsletter a shining success. These lesbians did such an outstanding job that our little W CI newsletter grew and became the respected professional newspaper you now hold in your hand. Unfortunately, the workload required to accomplish all the tasks involved can no longer be maintained by Publication volunteers. Many of the current volunteer staff have worked on the paper for a half dozen years or more and now need, and want, to devote their spare time to other pursuits. Though the Women's Central News will cease to exist, the Women's Center, Inc. will go on and find other ways to serve the lesbian community. It has been a time of great reflection and soul searching for us all. We care deeply about the lesbian community and realize that the demise of the newspaper will leave women without a connection. The calendar of events and activities in each monthly issue has been a lifeline for many lesbians.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Range Transit Plan for the Phoenix Urbanized Area
    National Transportation Library Section 508 and Accessibility Compliance The National Transportation Library (NTL) both links to and collects electronic documents in a variety of formats from a variety of sources. The NTL makes every effort to ensure that the documents it collects are accessible to all persons in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 (29 USC 794d), however, the NTL, as a library and digital repository, collects documents it does not create, and is not responsible for the content or form of documents created by third parties. Since June 21, 2001, all electronic documents developed, procured, maintained or used by the federal government are required to comply with the requirements of Section 508. If you encounter problems when accessing our collection, please let us know by writing to [email protected] or by contacting us at (800) 853- 1351. Telephone assistance is available 9AM to 6:30PM Eastern Time, 5 days a week (except Federal holidays). We will attempt to provide the information you need or, if possible, to help you obtain the information in an alternate format. Additionally, the NTL staff can provide assistance by reading documents, facilitate access to specialists with further technical information, and when requested, submit the documents or parts of documents for further conversion. Document Transcriptions In an effort to preserve and provide access to older documents, the NTL has chosen to selectively transcribe printed documents into electronic format. This has been achieved by making an OCR (optical character recognition) scan of a printed copy. Transcriptions have been proofed and compared to the originals, but these are NOT exact copies of the official, final documents.
    [Show full text]
  • MORRISON INSTITUTE for PUBLIC POLICY / SCHOOL of PUBLIC AFFAIRS / COLLEGE of PUBLIC PROGRAMS Principal Authors
    Which Way MARCH 2003 Scottsdale? MORRISON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY / SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS / COLLEGE OF PUBLIC PROGRAMS Principal Authors Mary Jo Waits Morrison Institute for Public Policy William Fulton Solimar Research Group, Inc. Research Team Tim Hogan With Assistance From Mary Jo Waits Director Karen Heard Associate Director Center for Business Research, ASU Chalk Design Morrison Institute for Public Policy William Fulton Alice Willey Suzanne Taylor President Morrison Institute for Public Policy Senior Management Research Analyst Solimar Research Group, Inc. Morrison Institute for Public Policy Karen Leland Susan Weaver Morrison Institute for Public Policy Rebecca Gau Research Associate Senior Management Research Analyst Solimar Research Group, Inc. Cherylene Schick Morrison Institute for Public Policy Morrison Institute for Public Policy Linda E. Hollis Richard Heffernon Senior Research Associate Nielle McCammon Senior Management Research Analyst Solimar Research Group, Inc. Morrison Institute for Public Policy Morrison Institute for Public Policy Citizen Survey Sean Borzea Joel Wright Cover Artwork ©2003 Noah Woods Graduate Assistant Wright Consulting Services Morrison Institute for Public Policy Tom Rex Maps ©2003 by the Arizona Board of Regents Research Manager Information Technology Research for and on behalf of Arizona State University Center for Business Research, ASU Support Lab – GIS Services, ASU and its Morrison Institute for Public Policy. Funders of Which Way Scottsdale? “Intrigued by the Morrison Institute for Public Policy report, Five Shoes Waiting to Drop on Arizona’s Future, we retained the Institute to conduct a similar research-driven look at Scottsdale’s past, present and future.” Barrett-Jackson Car Auction Discount Tire Company Scottsdale Insurance Compass Bank General Dynamics Southwest Jets DMB Associates Scottsdale Area Chamber of Commerce The Dial Corporation Desert Mountain Properties Scottsdale Healthcare Wells Fargo Bank Which Way Scottsdale? To borrow a phrase from the software world, “Scottsdale 1.0” was a great success.
    [Show full text]
  • Papago Plaza 6-ZN-2018
    Item 24 cnYMNai REPORT Meeting Date: December 12, 2018 General Plan Element: Land Use General Plan Goal: Create a sense of community through land uses ACTION Papago Plaza 6-ZN-2018 Request to consider the following: 1. Adopt Ordinance No. 4377 approving a Zoning District Map Amendment from Highway Commercial (C-3) to Planned Community (P-C) District zoning, utilizing the P-C comparable Planned Regional Center (PRC) District, including adopting a development plan and amended PRC development standards on a +/-H-acre site located on the southwest corner of McDowell and Scottsdale Road (APN: 129-12-OOlY and 129-12-OOlK). 2. Adopt Resolution No. 11326 declaring the document titled "Papago Plaza Rezoning and Development Plan" to be a public record. Goal/Purpose of Request The applicant seeks approval to rezone the subject site from C-3 to P-C, utilizing the P-C comparable PRC zoning district to regulate development, to allow for redevelopment of the site into a mixed- use project. Key Items for Consideration • P-C District Findings • Compliance with Southern Scottsdale Character Area Plan (SSCAP) Goals and Policies • Redevelopment and revitalization of an underutilized site within a General Plan designated Growth Area i: • Use mix includes pad buildings for destination SliTiE restaurants and a neighborhood grocer, both I identified as needs by the surrounding community I E • Significant frontage (approximately 850 feet) along itmietta iSkysong the City's signature corridor (Scottsdale Road) street K • Amendments to PRC development standards
    [Show full text]