DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Paper Example 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Paper Example 1 SUSTAINING THELessons learned GARDEN from city planning rootedCITY in social change and the appreciation of nature Figure 2 Artist Spencer Gore depicts the experience of ARTHIST 369R The Architect + the City walking through the greenbelt of a Garden City. Word Count: 3127 [source: The Art of Building a Garden City] he twenty-first century can be In 1898, Ebenezer Howard published transformational impact of art and nature characterized by a growing To-morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform, on human well-being, placing emphasis on awareness of the problems that in which he described the Garden City socialist and anarchist ideas about the fair both plague humanity and are as the “town-country,” incorporating the distribution of land and practical solutions Tcreated as a result of our very existence. best features of urbanism and ruralism in to transportation and sanitation needs [1] In particular, interdisciplinary research into such a way that the people would choose (Figure 2). chronic illnesses, age-related diseases, and it over the traditional “town” or “country” In 1902, Howard’s book was reissued as cancer has attributed the root causes— (Figure 1). The Garden City plan consists of Garden Cities of Tomorrow, foreshadowing inflammation and oxidative stress—to the a constellation of radial, interconnected, the renowned influence that both Howard symbiotic relationship between public self-sustaining communities surrounded and his Garden City would have on twentieth health and the environment. In an effort by greenbelts and containing designated century urban planning, especially in to both encourage healthy lifestyles and areas for housing, industry, recreation, and justifying housing developments that are combat climate change, city-planning has agriculture. Designed as an antithesis to at best loosely built on the core ideals and come upon a recent trend to revisit and urban sprawl and overcrowding in cities, properties outlined in the original theory. reimagine the Garden City. Howard created a method to suggest the For instance, Römerstadt—the primary 1 The social context of the Garden we can extrapolate four key principles City movement of building new communities: (1) take a In order to best understand the core long-term, holistic approach, (2) spatial values of the Garden City, it is necessary patterns of growth matter—towns must to first explore the social atmosphere have a “stop”, (3) ensure that the profits that prompted its inception. The history from development benefit everyone, and of utopian tradition dates back to the (4) nurture social sustainability through sixteenth century when Thomas More meaningful public participation and long- wrote Utopia, detailing how communities term stewardship [10]. would eventually develop into egalitarian The first practical application of these societies that opposed the British ruling principles can be found at Letchworth, class. This triggered a movement to located thirty-eight miles north of London. A create spaces that promoted land reform, true Garden City, two-thirds of Letchworth’s social equality, and democracy [4]. In the acreage is dedicated to an agricultural belt eighteenth century, industrialization and the for the production of local food and only enclosure of commons by private landlords one tree from the original landscape was characterized cities as places of universal removed to build the residential areas which poverty inhabited by the working class [5]. currently house approximately 33,000 As a counter to the overcrowded, unsanitary inhabitants—meeting Howard’s goal of conditions of urban life, the Arts and a highly-populated yet accommodating Crafts movement arose in the nineteenth development [11]. The settlement was century out of the belief that well-designed planned by architects Raymond Unwin developments complemented nature and Barry Parker, who successfully Figure 1 Howard described the Garden as opposed to destroying it [6]. Howard adapted the Garden City ideals to the City as a “Town-Country” which blends appears to have been heavily influenced unique topography of Letchworth. Like the best aspects of both the “Town” and by these ideas because he writes in To- Howard, Unwin and Parker believed that the “Country” such that it will naturally morrow that the Garden City is “designed the city grows out of community and that for humanity at large” and that its primary creativity is derived from an imaginative attract the people to it. objective is to facilitate improvements to understanding of the past [12]. Unwin, who [source: Garden Cities of Tomorrow] the lifestyles of the working class [7]. In was a labor organizer and member of the developing his plan, Howard considered Fabian society, prioritized in his architecture achievement of the post-World War I “Das energy, local food, access to green spaces, many of the utopian values upon which Neue Frankfurt” urban expansion and and healthcare; he also proposed that part the Garden City was conceptualized. In housing program—is often referred to as of the substantial increase in values that his writings, he criticized the haphazard the modern Garden City (Figure 3). Though arise from the development of land should growth of British industrial cities. Unwin the initiative re-housed over ten percent of always be reinvested into the community pushed for the consideration of people Frankfurt’s population and was instrumental for the benefit of all [8]. Furthermore, in urban planning as opposed to profit in addressing the housing shortage and Howard emphasizes the “absence of and above all else hoped to create more overall lack of attention to city planning in plan” to illustrate the autonomy that the open spaces that increased the circulation Frankfurt between 1913 and 1924, these residents of the Garden City should have in of light and air. In doing so, he hoped to new settlements do no meet Howard’s determining how their community should bring artistry (and therefore beauty) back criteria for a Garden City [2]. evolve over time [9]. From these ideals, to city building, which at the time had run Among other reasons, Römerstadt was both conceptualized and realized Figure 3 Romerstadt was the primary as a satellite city whose residents are still reliant on the main city for jobs and all achievement of the “Das Neue Frankfurt” but immediate shopping needs and the urban expansion and housing program. bare necessities of daily life [3]. That said, [source: Journal of Urban History] there appears to be a correlation worth studying between the development of Frankfurt am Main, which was heavily inspired by the Garden City, and the fact that modern-day Frankfurt is one of the most environmentally-conscious cities in the world, according to the Arcadis Sustainable Cities Index. By comparing the Garden City—both through Howard’s vision for city planning and Letchworth as an example of the first true Garden City— to Römerstadt and other settlements that have been erroneously characterized as garden cities, the aspects of Howard’s plan that best predict success with regard to social reformation can be pinpointed and applied to the development of sustainable cities in the twenty-first century. 2 rampant with the production of row after back to the home in order to promote the museum, town hall, concert hall, and row of stock-planned houses. Ultimately, nuclear family and a feeling of communal theatre. The next outermost ring consists what Unwin instilled in his interpretation of ownership of the land in which everybody of a Central Park, around which the Crystal the Garden City was the desire to create a would become entrepreneurs to support Palace—essentially a shopping complex— “new local patriotism” among the residents the economy, as Howard had planned [19]. facilitates the sale of manufactured goods. of Letchworth that had previously been This however did not happen because Residential spaces broken up by gardens perceived to be lost once people moved unlike Unwin, May embodied the German can be found further out, with factories out of the main city [13]. paradox of social development that was at the periphery and pastures and farms Römerstadt too, was built as the result rooted in the belief that planning was to located at the outskirts (Figure 5). As of a call for progressive social reforms in reflect the perceived needs of the citizenry per this definition, garden suburbs like post-war Germany. The development of rather than considering their specific tastes the settlement orchestrated by Unwin in Das Neue Frankfurt correlates to the era of and desires [20]. As will be mentioned later, Hampstead are not examples of Garden the Weimar Republic in Germany. Despite this is but only one of the many ways in Cities because they lack industry, targeting the fact that this period was plagued which the theory upon which Römerstadt instead middle class commuters to the with hyperinflation caused by economic was built arguably deviates from the true main city [21]. recession and political extremism [14], a Garden City model. In order to facilitate community-building working class movement was on the rise; among residents, some groups of houses in addition to other labor restrictions, the Situating differences between were designed with common gardens and work week was capped at forty-eight hours, cooperative kitchens. The need for cars is health insurance coverage was increased, theory and reality minimized due to both the radial nature and the income tax was raised drastically. In When comparing the Garden City model of the plan and the fact that no inhabitant particular, there was a push for large-scale to settlements built using Garden City of the city is more than 660 yards from the social housing developments due to the principles, it is important to understand railway, which is used for both passengers lack of city-building for a decade after the that theory does not always translate in and goods [22].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Garden Cities Located in What Now Are the Suburbs of Berlin
    focus | 2009 | volume VI 53 GAR D EN CITIES: LESSONS FROM GERMANY Kar L ECKE R T Karl Eckert is a senior at Ebenezer Howard’s lessons and the Garden City movement spread throughout Europe the BCRP program, City between the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. In this article, Karl Eckert and Regional Planning Department, Cal Poly. discusses the origins of the movement and the translation of the concept to Germany. During a recent trip, he visited and studied tSiemensstadt and Britz, two garden cities located in what now are the suburbs of Berlin. In reading the book Cities of Tomorrow by Sir Peter Hall, one comes to realize the profession of planning is a relatively new field of expertise. Modern day city planning stems from the early 1900’s when the societies of the developing world were dealing with the menace of the urban slum, a new phenomenon spurred by industrial forces and a rise in migratory populations to major city centers for employment. Developing ideas that would counter-attack this dire urban condition would soon define and establish what is known today as city planning. Life in the Slums Peter Hall’s Cities of Tomorrow elaborates on how, during the period of 1880 to 1920, major cities such as London, Berlin, Paris and New York experienced complications with slum populations. These cities exhibited high concentrations of poor residents within areas defined by the lack of physical maintenance, crowded conditions, disregard for sanitation, and general social decline. Andrew Figure 1 Mearns, a pamphlet writer of the time, described the slums of London with clarity: The Siemens factory, which was the main employment outlet “Few who read these pages have any conception of what these pestilential human rookeries for those living in are, where tens of thousands are crowded together amidst horrors which call to mind what we Seimensstadt.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Garden City Movement Onwards
    From the Garden City Movement Onwards Utopianism in British Garden Cities Rick William Moerman Department of Human Geography Examiner: Mads Barbesgaard SGEM08 Supervisor: Anders Lund Hansen Spring 2020 2 Abstract With the publication of Garden Cities of To-Morrow in 1898, Ebenezer Howard gave the go-ahead to the Garden City Movement. Howard’s concept of the garden city arose from his anti-capitalist critiques. Many industrial cities in the United Kingdom were facing urbanization problems, leading to the working class living in terrible circumstances in the suburban areas. This process caused a poor quality of life, housing shortages, polluted air and water and a lack of access to nature. At the same time, the countryside lacked career opportunities and a lack of (cultural) amusement. Howard proposed the garden city as a new alternative to both ways of living. A garden city would have a green character and a blooming cultural life. Surrounding greenbelts and enough job opportunities would make the city self-sustainable. The reactions to Howard’s utopian ideas were mainly positive, leading to the construction of two garden cities in the United Kingdom. Letchworth and Welwyn Garden City were located close to London and offered a way of living as proposed by Howard. These projects were considered successful, leading to the establishment of the related New Town Movement. This movement eventually led to the creation of 28 new and self-sustaining towns all over the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, the two original garden cities had developed into rich commuter towns which had become too expansive for the working class population.
    [Show full text]
  • OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY of HISTORIC RESOURCES
    OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES II. HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT A. Torrance and Garden City Movement: The plan for the original City of Torrance, known as the Olmsted Tract, owes its origins to a movement that begin in England in the late 19th Century. Sir Ebenezer Howard published his manifesto “Garden Cities of To-morrow" in 1898 where he describes a utopian city in which man lives harmoniously together with the rest of nature. The London suburbs of Letchworth Garden City and Welwyn Garden City were the first built examples of garden city planning and became a model for urban planners in America. In 1899 Ebenezer founded the Garden City Association to promote his idea for the Garden City ‘in which all the advantages of the most energetic town life would be secured in perfect combination with all the beauty and delight of the country.” His notions about the integration of nature with town planning had profound influence on the design of cities and the modern suburb in the 20th Century. Examples of Garden City Plans in America include: Forest Hills Gardens, New York (by Fredrick Law Olmsted Jr.); Radburn, New Jersey; Shaker Heights, Ohio; Baldwin Hills Village, in Los Angeles, California and Greenbelt, Maryland. Fredrick Law Olmsted is considered to be the father of the landscape architecture profession in America. He had two sons that inherited his legacy and firm. They practiced as the Olmsted Brothers of Brookline Massachusetts. Fredrick Law Olmsted Junior was a founding member of The National Planning Institute of America and was its President from 1910 to 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifts in Modernist Architects' Design Thinking
    arts Article Function and Form: Shifts in Modernist Architects’ Design Thinking Atli Magnus Seelow Department of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Sven Hultins Gata 6, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden; [email protected]; Tel.: +46-72-968-88-85 Academic Editor: Marco Sosa Received: 22 August 2016; Accepted: 3 November 2016; Published: 9 January 2017 Abstract: Since the so-called “type-debate” at the 1914 Werkbund Exhibition in Cologne—on individual versus standardized types—the discussion about turning Function into Form has been an important topic in Architectural Theory. The aim of this article is to trace the historic shifts in the relationship between Function and Form: First, how Functional Thinking was turned into an Art Form; this orginates in the Werkbund concept of artistic refinement of industrial production. Second, how Functional Analysis was applied to design and production processes, focused on certain aspects, such as economic management or floor plan design. Third, how Architectural Function was used as a social or political argument; this is of particular interest during the interwar years. A comparison of theses different aspects of the relationship between Function and Form reveals that it has undergone fundamental shifts—from Art to Science and Politics—that are tied to historic developments. It is interesting to note that this happens in a short period of time in the first half of the 20th Century. Looking at these historic shifts not only sheds new light on the creative process in Modern Architecture, this may also serve as a stepstone towards a new rethinking of Function and Form. Keywords: Modern Architecture; functionalism; form; art; science; politics 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfers of Modernism: Constructing Soviet Postwar Urbanity
    Transfers of Modernism: Constructing Soviet Postwar Urbanity The housing shortage during the postwar period has brought a new surge in the development of prefabrication technologies, especially in 1950s East Germany, France and the Soviet Union— the countries that suffered significant physical damage from the war. Although the prefabrication building techniques were evidently not an invention of the MASHA PANTELEYEVA 1950s and there has been a long tradition of similar types of construction and experi- Princeton University mentation in building culture, the need for a new and improved efficiency in construction rapidly emerged in the situation of an extreme postwar housing crisis. Formed by the multiple geopolitical and economic aspects of the postwar architectural context, the new method focused on the construction with large concrete panels prefabricated offsite, which allowed cutting down production costs and significantly reducing time of construc- tion. This development was inseparable from architecture’s political and social context: most of the building associated with the new typology in the reconstruction period was subsidized by the state, characterized by the intense involvement of political figures. Originally developed in France with the initiative of the Ministry of Reconstruction and Urbanism in the late 1940s, the large-panel system building experienced a rapid adapta- tion across Europe: its aesthetic and technological qualities underwent “back-and-forth” cultural alterations between the countries, and eventually determined the failure of the system in the West, and its long-lasting success in Eastern Europe. The technological basis of most European prefabricated buildings was developed in European states with stable social-democratic policies, particularly in Scandinavia, Great Britain, and France.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Modern American City Planning
    FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN AMERICAN CITY PLANNING Most historians agree that modern American city planning began in the late 1800’s. Some affix the date to 1893 and the Columbian Exposition in Chicago, though there is less orthodoxy regarding this moment than 15 years ago. In contrast to the earlier Colonial planning period (Philadelphia, Savannah, Williamsburg, etc.) wherein plans preceded development, planning in the 1800s generally responded to the urbanization stimulated by the industrial revolution in existing and haphazardly developing cities. The American Industrial Revolution occurred in two waves, the first in 1820-1870 and the second in 1870-1920. The U.S. grew from 7% urban in 1820 to 25% urban in 1870 and 50% urban in 1920. Several social movements categorized as precursors to modern American city planning (public health, sanitary reform, settlement house and housing reform, parks planning) responded to the challenges and consequences of chaotic urbanization prior to modern planning’s beginnings. The City Beautiful movement was a fifth response at about the same time that modern planning began. The Garden Cities Movement simultaneously commenced in England and was imported soon after. American planning grew out of and hoped to provide a broader, more comprehensive vision to these movements. Five interrelated and overlapping 1. Sanitary Reform Movement movements of the 19th Century have 2. Parks Planning/Parks Systems Movement profound effect on the first half of 3. Settlement House/Housing Reform Movement the 20th Century 4. Garden City Movement 5. City Beautiful Movement Movement Attributes Sanitary Reform (extensive overlap An outgrowth and response to the accelerating with and sometimes referred to as urbanization of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Späten Ernst-May-Siedlungen in Hessen
    Die späten Ernst-May-Siedlungen in Hessen Maren Harnack Paola Wechs Julian Glunde Die späten Ernst-May-Siedlungen in Hessen Schelmengraben Klarenthal Parkfeld Kranichstein Die späten Ernst-May-Siedlungen in Hessen Eine Untersuchung von Prof. Dr.-Ing. Maren Harnack, MA Paola Wechs und Julian Glunde In Zusammenarbeit mit dem .andesamt fØr DenkmalRƃege Hessen Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences Fachbereich 1 Architektur, Bauingenieurwesen, Geomatik Nibelungenplatz 1 60318 Frankfurt am Main [email protected] Gestaltung Elmar Lixenfeld / www.duodez.de ISBN 978-3-947273-20-1 © 2019 Maren Harnack Inhalt 7 Einleitung 9 Kriterien für die Beschreibung und Bewertung von Siedlungen der Nachkriegsmoderne Planerisches Konzept / Geschichtliche Bedeutung / Städtebauliche Struktur / Architektur / Freiraumstruktur / Freiraumgestaltung / Erschließungsstruktur / Einbindung in die Umgebung 19 Fallstudien 20 Schelmengraben Wiesbaden Beschreibung Bewertung 66 Klarenthal Wiesbaden Beschreibung Bewertung 110 Parkfeld Wiesbaden Beschreibung Bewertung 148 Kranichstein Darmstadt Beschreibung Bewertung 190 Prinzipien für die Weiterentwicklung von Siedlungen der Nachkriegsmoderne Allgemeingültige Prinzipen Wiesbaden / Schelmengraben / Klarenthal / Parkfeld / Darmstadt Kranichstein 233 Wie weiterbauen? 235 Quellen Literatur / Bildnachweis Einleitung 7 Deutschlandweit herrscht in den prosperierenden Ballungsräumen ein Mangel an günstigem Wohnraum. Viele Großstädte verfügen kaum noch über Baulandreserven, und neu auszuweisendes Bauland konkurriert mit
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Theory
    Responses to the Industrial City Planning, Social Theory & Policy Industrial City (1870-1920) Population Change: Multiplier Effect Social Change: Immigrants & Class Issues Technological & Environmental Change Restructuring the City Chicago as ‘Shock City’ Multiplier Effect Population Growth: 1840 - 4,470 1870 – 298,977 1900 – 1,698,575 1930 – 3,376,438 Social Change ‘New Immigrants’ (1880 – 1920) – *Eastern European *Southern European Industrial Workers – strikes & violence New Land Use Patterns Central Business District Industrial Districts Residential Districts Commuter Suburbs Industrial Suburbs [Burgess’ Concentric Zone Model] Central Business District Skyscrapers --steel frame --elevator Department Stores Mass Market of Housing Rise of Real Estate Developer Example: S.E. Gross – ‘Friend of the Working Man’ New York’s Zoning “ . Restrictions on land use are constitutional because they enable city government to carry out their duties of protecting the health, safety, morals and general welfare of their citizens.” 1) Separate land uses into appropriate zones; 2) Restrict building heights 3) Limit lot coverage Environmental Controls Emergence of Zoning Laws/Building Codes Parks Movement City Beautiful Movement City Beautiful Movement Goals “beauty, order, system & harmony” Middle & upper-class effort to refashion the city into beautiful, functional entities Focus on civic improvements & parks Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City Howard’s vision Life’s experience: Homesteading, Chicago – before 1871 Town/Country Ebenezer Howard no training in
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 AICP Review Course HISTORY and THEORY
    2011 AICP Review Course HISTORY AND THEORY February 2011 Kelly O’Brien, AICP, PP, LEED AP Professional Development Officer of Exam Prep American Planning Association – New Jersey Chapter MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY History and Theory (and Law) 15% • History of planning • Planning law • Theory of planning • Patterns of human settlement MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY Primary functions of planning • improve efficiency of outcomes • counterbalance market failures - balance public and private interests • widen the range of choice - enhance consciousness of decision making • civic engagement - expand opportunity and understanding in community MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY Professionalization of Planning 1901 NYC: “New Law” regulates tenement housing 1907 Hartford: first official & permanent local planning board 1909 – Washington DC: first planning association – National Conference on City Planning – Wisconsin: first state enabling legislation permitting cities to plan – Chicago Plan: Burnham creates first regional plan – Los Angeles: first land use zoning ordinance – Harvard School of Landscape Architecture: first course in city planning MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY Pre-modern to New Urban Form 1682 Philadelphia plan Grid system & William Penn neighborhood parks Thomas Holme 1695 Annapolis plan Radiocentric Francis Nicholson 1733 Savannah Ward park system Oglethorpe 1790 Washington Grand, whole city plan Pierre L’Enfant 1852-1870 Paris Model for “City Beautiful” Napoleon III; Haussmann 1856 Central Park First major purchase of F L Olmsted Sr parkland 1869 Riverside, IL Model curved street FL Olmsted Sr “suburb” Calvert Vaux 1880 Pullman, IL Model industrial town George Pullman MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY Philosophies and Movements Agrarian Philosophy 1800’S – Belief that a life rooted in agriculture is the most humanly valuable.
    [Show full text]
  • Bodies and Nature in International Garden City Movement Planning, 1898-1937
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: ACTS OF LIVELIHOOD: BODIES AND NATURE IN INTERNATIONAL GARDEN CITY MOVEMENT PLANNING, 1898-1937 Samuel M. Clevenger Doctor of Philosophy, 2018 Dissertation directed by: Professor David L. Andrews Department of Kinesiology Urban planning and reform scholars and policymakers continue to cite the “garden city” community model as a potential blueprint for planning environmentally sustainable, economically equitable, humane built environments. Articulated by the British social reformer Sir Ebenezer Howard and his 1898 book To-Morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform, the model represented a method for uniting the benefits of town and country through a singular, pre-planned, “healthy” community, balancing spaces of “countryside” and “nature” with affordable, well-built housing and plentiful cultural attractions associated with city life. The book catalyzed an early twentieth-century international movement for the promotion and construction of garden cities. Howard’s garden city remains a highly influential context in the history of town planning and urban public health reform, as well as more recent environmentally-friendly urban design movements. To date, while historians have long examined the garden city as an agent of social and spatial reform, little analysis has been devoted to the role of prescribed embodiment and deemed “healthy” physical cultural forms and practices in the promotion and construction of garden cities as planned communities for “healthy living.” Informed by recent scholarship in Physical Cultural Studies (PCS), embodied environmental history, cultural materialism, and theories of modern biopower, this dissertation studies the cultural history of international garden city movement planning in early twentieth century Britain and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    www.frankfurt-tourismus.de Press Release “New Frankfurt” – Between the Skyline and the Römerberg Older than the city’s banking high-rises, newer than the old town centre: Frankfurt has the Bauhaus movement of the 1920s to thank for its very first high-rise … and the fitted kitchen. The Bauhaus style is widely regarded as one of the world’s most significant architectonic movements, influencing modern architecture, art and design far beyond Germany’s borders. The fundamental idea behind Bauhaus was to harmoniously combine architecture, art and handcraft, resulting in a single structural masterpiece. Walter Gropius founded the Bauhaus School of Architecture in Weimar, Germany, in 1919. It remained there until 1925, when it was moved to Dessau. In 1932, the school moved to Berlin, closing only a year later because of pressure put on its leadership by the National Socialist regime. But how much did the Bauhaus movement influence Frankfurt? Locals and visitors are of course familiar with the city’s modern skyline and the Römerberg old town centre. But do they know of “New Frankfurt”? This housing programme was equally important in shaping the cityscape of the metropolis on the River Main. It was the architect duo of Ernst May and Martin Elsaesser who implemented the ideas of “New Objectivity”, which were taught at the Bauhaus School, in various Frankfurt districts between 1925 and 1930, thereby creating what became known as “New Frankfurt”. Bauhaus-styled residential estates include, for example, Estate Westhausen, Estate Praunheim, Estate Höhenblick, Estate Bruchfeldstraße, Estate Am Bornheimer Hang and Estate Hellerhof. The Römerstadt and the Ernst May Show-House – home of the world’s very first series-produced fitted kitchen – are two further, particularly interesting examples of the Bauhaus style.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Garden City': the Suitability of Its Principles As a Model To
    ‘Garden City’:The Suitability of Its Principles as a Model to The Contemporary Planning (Evalina Z dan Husnus S) ‘GARDEN CITY’: THE SUITABILITY OF ITS PRINCIPLES AS A MODEL TO THE CONTEMPORARY PLANNING Evalina Z. dan Husnus Sawab Jurusan Arsitektur Universitas Syiah Kula Banda Aceh [email protected] & [email protected] ABSTRACT. Garden City is an urban planning concept that adopted from of Ebenezer Howard who developed the idea of garden cities as a way towards a better and brighter civilization. This article discuss the Garden City concept as associated to planning evolution and describes the later changes in approach to planning better cities in current circumstances. Based on arguments from some experts and evidence derived from practice, Garden City is the novel idea that has a unique presentation because of its simplicity and range of details which consist of three main elements including decentralization, garden and city or in simple terms are location, physical design and community ownership. These days, while in some extent the Garden City idea is still attractive especially in terms of the idea of green design and social city model, the appropriateness of the Garden City idea to contemporarycopyright planning seems invalid. The Garden City concepts such as decentralization, low density, self-containment communities, new settlements and proportion of population to land are not anymore fit with current situation which is urban population growth rapidly imbalance with land availability. Urban concept today tends to consider environmental approach in order to gain sustainable goals such as ‘compact city’ concept in planning the better city. The Garden City has a valuable contribution to evolution of urban and regional planning approach, but it is not entirely relevant to the contemporary planning approach.
    [Show full text]