DOCSLIB.ORG

Pierre De Gigord Collection of Photographs of the Ottoman Empire and the Republic of Turkey, 1852-1950

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pierre De Gigord Collection of Photographs of the Ottoman Empire and the Republic of Turkey, 1852-1950 http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt038nd8h9 No online items INVENTORY OF THE PIERRE DE GIGORD COLLECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY, 1852-1950 Finding aid prepared by Paul Arenson. INVENTORY OF THE PIERRE DE GIGORD 96.R.14 1 COLLECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND THE REPUBLIC O... Descriptive Summary Title: Pierre de Gigord collection of photographs of the Ottoman Empire and the Republic of Turkey Date (inclusive): 1852-1950 Number: 96.R.14 Creator/Collector: Gigord, Pierre de Physical Description: 72.0 linear feet Repository: The Getty Research Institute Special Collections 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California, 90049-1688 (310) 440-7390 Abstract: Over 6,000 photographs collected by Pierre de Gigord document the Ottoman Empire and its transformation into the Republic of Turkey, ca. 1852-1950. Included are pamphlets and offprints regarding photography in the Ottoman Empire. Request Materials: Request access to the physical materials described in this inventory through the catalog record for this collection. Click here for the access policy . Language: Collection material is in English Biographical/Historical Note Pierre de Gigord, a French business man who has lived and worked in Asia, assembled his photograph collection over a period of more than 12 years. Access Open for use by qualified researchers. The collection is partially cataloged. Publication Rights Contact Library Reproductions and Permissions . Preferred Citation Pierre de Gigord collection of photographs of the Ottoman Empire and the Republic of Turkey, The Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles, Accession no. 96.R.14. Acquisition Information Acquired from Pierre de Gigord, 1995-1996. A supplement of 53 photographs, including 16 cartes-de-visite and 12 views of Istanbul by James Robertson, was received as a donation from Gigord in late 1996. Scope and Content of Collection Over 6,000 photographic images form a visual archive of the Ottoman Empire and Republic of Turkey, ca. 1831-1950. The collection focuses on cultural and urban images, mainly of Istanbul, but also of other cities and towns in Turkey, with a few images from Egypt, Greece, and India. The collection is supported by pamphlets and offprints regarding photography in the Ottoman Empire. The collection comprises photographic images in various sizes and formats, including cartes-de-visites, cabinet cards, stereographs, glass plates, and panoramas. Many photographic prints are mounted in albums, others are on loose pages. Photographic techniques include albumens, autochromes, collotypes, ferrotypes, opaltypes, salted paper prints, as well as gelatin silver prints. Photographers include Ali Sami, Hamdi Bey, A. Svoboda, Sébah & Joaillier, Pascal Sébah, Amadeo Preziosi, Abdulluh frères, Apollon (Firm), the Scottish photographer James Robertson, Pierre Trémaux, Ernest de Caranza, the archaologist Jules Delbert, A. de Moustier, and Ferrier, among others. Note: Collection is cataloged at the item level through most of Series II, through half of Box 81*. Series III-XI are partially and minimally cataloged. Arrangement note The collection is arranged in 11 series, by lot numbers (and size) as received from Gigord: Series I. Albums, large format, 1852-1920Series II. Photographs on loose mounts, ca. 1870-1920Series III. Albums, various formats, 1880-1935Series IV. Panoramas, 1854-1890Series V. Pièces particulières (individual items), 1854-1929Series VI. Cabinet cards and cartes-de-visite, 1860-1940Series VII. Glass plates, 1850s-1915Series VIII. Stereographs, 1850s-1910Series IX. Miscellaneous collections, 1890-1950Series X. DocumentationSeries XI. Supplement, ca. 1865-1900 INVENTORY OF THE PIERRE DE GIGORD 96.R.14 2 COLLECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND THE REPUBLIC O... Subjects - Corporate Bodies Ayasofya Müzesi Topkapi Palace (Istanbul, Turkey) Subjects - Topics Architecture, Bysantine--Turkey--Istanbul Architecture, Islamic--Turkey Architecture--Egypt Architecture--India Architecture--Turkey Cities and towns--Egypt Cities and towns--Turkey Men--portraits Mosques--India Mosques--Turkey Railroads--Turkey--Buildings and structures Tobacco industry--History--Turkey Veils Women--portraits Subjects - Places Bombay (India) Bosporus (Turkey) Ephesus (Extinct city) Hierapolis (Turkey : Extinct city) Istanbul (Turkey) Izmar (Turkey) Laodicea ad Lycum (Extinct city) Genres and Forms of Material Albumen prints Autochromes Cabinet cards Cartes-de-visite Dry collodion negatives Gelatin silver prints Panoramas Photographic prints Photographs, Original Photolithographs Salted paper prints Stereographs Contributors Abdullah frères Ali Sami, 1866-1936 Apollon (Firm) Berggren, G. (Guillaume), 1835-1920 Caranza , Ernest de Delbet, Jules Ferrier, Claude Marie, 1811-1889 Goupil & Cie INVENTORY OF THE PIERRE DE GIGORD 96.R.14 3 COLLECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND THE REPUBLIC O... Kargopoulo, Basil Lékégian, G. Léon & Levy (Firm) Moustier, A. de Photoglob Co. Preziosi, Amadeo, 1816-1882 Robertson, James, 1813-1888 Sebah & Joaillier Svoboda, A. (Alex) Sébah, J. Pascal Trémaux, P. (Pierre) Series I. Albums, large format, 1852-1920. Physical Description: 40 albums Scope and Content Note Albums contain between 10 and 137 photographs. Most hold images of Turkey, and of Istanbul in particular. Two albums document railroad construction in the region. Arranged by lot number and size, Lots -. Individual photographs are identified by lot number, volume number if the lot consists of more than one album (V), and folio (F), i.e., page number. Folio recto and verso are designated with a and b respectively. Box 1 Lot A1 Caranza, Ernest de. Photographies Constantinople, 1852. Physical Description: 12.0 photographic prints1 album : salted paper; 34.5 x 48 cm. Scope and Content Note Album notes: Detached brown skin boards embossed in gold; leaves disbound and loose, in fragile condition. On verso of front cover, stamped notes read "Discarded" and "Tercüman Gazetesi Kitapliği". Box 1 A1.F01 Caranza, Ernest de. Fontaine à Eiaub, 1852. Physical Description: 1 photographic print: salted paper print ; 21 x 17 cm., on mount 34 x 46 cm. Fountains; Eyüp (Istanbul, Turkey)Published in: PG, p. 66 Scope and Content Note In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 01 Box 1 A1.F02 Caranza, Ernest de. Coteau du Maggiar (Péra), [1852]. Physical Description: 1 photographic print: salted paper print ; 16 x 22.5 cm., on mount 34 x 46 cm. Landscape; Dwellings; Cities and towns; Beyoğlu (Istanbul, Turkey) Scope and Content Note In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 02 Box 1 A1.F03 Caranza, Ernest de. Maisons turques au petit champ des morts (Péra), 1852. Physical Description: 1 photographic print: salted paper print; 17 x 22.5 cm., on mount 34 x 46 cm. Dwellings; Beyoğlu (Istanbul, Turkey) Scope and Content Note In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 03 INVENTORY OF THE PIERRE DE GIGORD 96.R.14 4 COLLECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND THE REPUBLIC O... Series I.Albums, large format, 1852-1920. Box 1 A1.F04 Caranza, Ernest de. Fontaine de Ste. Sophie (Constantinople), 1852. Physical Description: 1 photographic print: salted paper; 17 x 22 cm., on mount 34 x 46 cm. Fountains; Ayasofya Müzesi; Ayasofya Şadırvanı (Istanbul, Turkey) Scope and Content Note [Saint Sophia, Sainte Sophie, Hagia Sophia, Haghia Sophia] In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 04 Box 1 A1.F05 Caranza, Ernest de. Rue à Eioub, [1852]. Physical Description: 1 photographic print: salted paper; 16 x 22.3 cm., on mount 34 x 46 cm. Streets; Mausoleums [?]; Gates; Domes; Eyüp (Istanbul, Turkey) Scope and Content Note In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 05 Box 1 A1.F06 Caranza, Ernest de. Tombeau du Sultan Suleyman (Constantinople), 1852. Physical Description: 1 photographic print: salted paper; 16.5 x 22 cm., on mount 34 x 46 cm. Mausoleums; Sultan Süleyman Türbesi (Istanbul, Turkey) Scope and Content Note Tomb of Sultan Suleyman In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 06 Box 1 A1.F07 Caranza, Ernest de. Quartier d'Aga Djami (Péra) et coteau de Latavola [?], [1852]. Physical Description: 1 photographic print: salted paper; 16.5 x 22 mm. on mount 34 x 46 cm. Landscape; Dwellings; Cities and towns; Beyoğlu (Istanbul, Turkey) Scope and Content Note In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 07 Box 1 A1.F08 Caranza, Ernest de. Constantinople: Arsenal Kassim Pacha, [1852]. Physical Description: 1 photographic print : salted paper; 17 x 22.2 cm., on mount 34 x 46 cm. Arsenals; Landscape; Cities and towns; Dwellings; Kasımpaşa (Istanbul, Turkey); Bosporus (Turkey) Scope and Content Note In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 08 Box 1 A1.F09 Caranza, Ernest de. Coté S. O. de la Mosquée de Sultan Suleyman (Constantinople), 1852. Physical Description: 1 photographic print: salted paper; 17 x 22.5 cm., on mount 34 x 46 cm. Mosques; Süleymaniye Camii (Istanbul, Turkey) Scope and Content Note Côté sud-ouest de la Mosquée de Sultan Suleyman = Southwest corner of Süleymaniye Mosque In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 09 Box 1 A1.F10 Caranza, Ernest de. Arnäaut Keuie (Bosphore), [1852]. Physical Description: 1 photographic print: salted paper; 17 x 22.2 cm., on mount 34 x 46 cm. Landscape; Cities and towns; Arnavutköy (Istanbul, Turkey); Bosporus (Turkey) Scope and Content Note In album: Photographies: Constantinople, folio: 10 Box 1 A1.F11 Caranza, Ernest de. Porte principale du palais impérial de Dolma baktché, [1852].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Sustainable View to Fener ‐ Balat District
    Papers A Sustainable View to Fener ‐ Balat District Kishali E. Politecnico di Milano, Building Environment Science Technology (BEST) [email protected] Grecchi M. Politecnico di Milano, Building Environment Science Technology (BEST) [email protected] TRADITIONAL TECHNIQUES AND DISTRICT REHABILITATION Sustainable rehabilitation and preservation strategies in historic quarters Industrialisation, started with Industrial Revolution in mid 18th century by the invention of machines but advanced fast in early 19th century by establishing factories in large areas, has changed various aspects of life in terms of economy, architecture, design, and construction, rate of production, social life and politics. However one aspect, the nature, became very important in architecture field when there have been various and serious problems on four basic elements of planet: earth, air, water and fire. All these elements have been influenced badly after industrialisation period due to high demand for rapid and heavy construction regarding the all aspects above. Nowadays, in architecture it is inevitable to find a link between nature and construction, engineering and design to preserve the resources of life which can be called sustainability. This link is very essential in today's new architectural designs to sustain environment but it is more interesting and difficult to find the sustainable link for historical buildings which were constructed during economical revolutions. The structures were constructed with peculiar technology, serviceability in its own environment and definite district, as the time passes the possibility to withstand changing environment conditions would become complicated. In this paper, historical residential buildings, constructed in 19th century in Fener – Balat Istanbul, Turkey, an important example of cultural heritage district, will be analysed in terms of three different views.
    [Show full text]
  • Blessing-Mahperi-Belleten.Pdf
    WOMEN PATRONS IN MEDIEVAL ANATOLIA AND A DISCUSSION OF MĀHBARĪ KHĀTŪN’S MOSQUE COMPLEX IN KAYSERI PATRICIA BLESSING* At the center of Kayseri, facing the well-preserved citadel stands a large architectural complex, consisting of a mosque, madrasa, mauso- leum, and the ruins of a double bathhouse [See figure 1]. The building, known locally as the Hunad Hatun or Huand Hatun Complex, was built in the second quarter of the thirteenth century. Inscriptions on both por- tals of the mosque date to 1237-38, while the other parts of the complex remain undated. At the time of construction, the patron of the complex, Māhbarī Khātūn, was the mother of the ruling Sultan Ghiyāth al-Dīn Kaykhusraw II (R 1237-46) and of the widows of the Sultan ‘Alā’ al-Dīn Kayqubād (R 1219-37).1 With her intervention in Kayseri and the con- struction of two caravanserais near Tokat and Yozgat, Māhbarī Khātūn is one of the most prolific female patrons in medieval Anatolia, and the one who is best documented inmonumental inscriptions, although not in much detail in other written sources of the period, such as chronicles and hagiographies. * Dr., Stanford Humanities Center, Stanford University, 424 Santa Teresa Street, Stan- ford, CA 94305, USA; [email protected]. 1 In modern Turkish, the name is more commonly spelled as Mahperi Hatun. Huand Hatun appears as a Turkish adaptation of the titles Khwand Khātūn. Another wife of the Sultan ‘Alā’ al-Dīn Kayqubād was Iṣmat al-Dunyā wa’l-Dīn al-Malika al-‘Ādila, a daughter of the Ayyubid ruler of Syria, al-Malik al-Ashraf Abū Bakr b.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny
    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottomans | Court Life
    The Ottomans | Court Life ‘The Topkap# Palace was the governmental centre and residence of the imperial family.’ The Topkap# Palace was the governmental centre and residence of the imperial family. It was founded on an area of the Istanbul peninsula which commands views of the Golden Horn on one side, and the Bosphorus Strait and the Sea of Marmara, on the other. It is a complex of buildings in three parts (birun, enderun and harem) situated within large gardens. The birun is between the first gate, Bab-# Hümayun (Imperial Gate), and the third gate, Babü’s-Saade (Gate of Felicity). The first courtyard accommodated the service buildings, the imperial mint, military barracks, ministries and other governmental offices. The second courtyard was called Alay Meydan# and housed the Divan-# Hümayun – also called ‘Under the Dome’ – the treasury, the kitchens, stables and the entrance to the harem. Ceremonies, for instance enthronement, the royal hearing in case of emergencies known as Alay Divan# (Assembly on Foot) and the celebration of feasts, were made in front of the Gate of Felicity. The sultan’s throne was also placed near the Gate; and the Holy Flag (Sancak-# #erif), the very symbol of the Ottoman Sultan as Caliph, was raised here when it was taken out of the Pavilion of the Holy Mantel on ceremonial occasions. Name: Topkap# Palace Dynasty: Construction began in hegira 9th century / AD 15th century, during the reign of Sultan Mehmed II (his second reign: AH 855–86 / AD 1451–81); the last addition was made under Sultan Abdülmecid ['Abd al-Majid] (r.
    [Show full text]
  • European Journal of Turkish Studies, 19 | 2014, « Heritage Production in Turkey
    European Journal of Turkish Studies Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey 19 | 2014 Heritage Production in Turkey. Actors, Issues, and Scales - Part I Producing an Official Heritage in a Time of "Neo-Ottomanism": Critical Approaches La fabrique du patrimoine en Turquie. Acteurs, enjeux, échelles - Partie I Le patrimoine officiel au prisme du « néo-ottomanisme » : approche critique Muriel Girard (dir.) Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4930 DOI: 10.4000/ejts.4930 ISSN: 1773-0546 Publisher EJTS Electronic reference Muriel Girard (dir.), European Journal of Turkish Studies, 19 | 2014, « Heritage Production in Turkey. Actors, Issues, and Scales - Part I » [Online], Online since 17 December 2014, connection on 28 March 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4930 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.4930 This text was automatically generated on 28 March 2020. © Some rights reserved / Creative Commons license 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Ce que nous apprend le patrimoine de l’État et de la société turcs : vue d’ensemble sur ce numéro double English version also available Muriel Girard 1.a. Making of categories, setting-up the instruments Le discours sur la protection du patrimoine en Turquie des Tanzimat à nos jours Stéphane Yerasimos Heritagisation of the “Ottoman/Turkish House” in the 1970s: Istanbul-based Actors, Associations and their Networks Ipek Türeli Insurmountable Tension? On the Relation of World Heritage and Rapid Urban Transformation in Istanbul Vivienne Marquart 1.b. Ottoman heritage as narratives and assets Re-creating history and recreating publics: the success and failure of recent Ottoman costume dramas in Turkish media. Josh Carney Civil Society’s History: New Constructions of Ottoman Heritage by the Justice and Development Party in Turkey Gizem Zencirci 1.c.
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSICAL TURKEY Archaeology and Mythology of Asia Minor Wednesday, June 12Th - Wednesday, June 26Th (14 Nights, 15 Days)
    CLASSICAL TURKEY Archaeology and Mythology of Asia Minor Wednesday, June 12th - Wednesday, June 26th (14 Nights, 15 Days) On this trip guests are guided through an in-depth examination of the Greco-Roman civilization in Western Asia Minor. The Aeolian and Ionian cities along the west coast of Anatolia were founded around 1000 B.C. while the Eastern Greek world made its first cultural gains at the beginning of the 7th century BC. We see first hand that Eastern Greek art and culture owe a considerable debt to their long-standing contact with the indigenous Lydian, Lycian and Carian cultures in Anatolia, not forgetting the Phrygians. The Ionian civilization was thus a product of the co-existence of Greeks with the natives of Asia Minor. The voyage of Jason and the Argonauts, legend of the Hellespont, the Iliad of Homer, Alexander the Great’s pilgrimage to Troy, Cleanthes of Assos, the Library of Pergamum, the legend of Asclepius, Coinage & Customs of the Lydians, the wealth of Croesus, the Temple of Diana, and the Oracle at Didyma will assist us in comprehending the creativity and inspiration of the period. Day 1 Istanbul Special category (4-star) hotel Guests are met by the tour director at the Atatürk Airport and are then taken to the hotel and assisted through check-in. Group participants meet each other and staff with a welcome drink before sitting down to dinner. (D) Day 2 Istanbul Special category (4-star) hotel This morning we visit the Istanbul Archaeology Museum (main building). The facade of the building was inspired by the Alexander Sarcophagus and Sarcophagus of the Mourning Women, both housed inside the Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Karaman Hatuniye Medresesi
    IDA: International Design and Art Journal ISSN: 2687-5373 Volume: 2, Issue: 1 / 2020 Received: 08.05.2020 / Accepted: 31.05.2020 YENİDEN KULLANILAMAYAN ANITSAL BİR YAPI: KARAMAN HATUNİYE MEDRESESİ Dr. Öğr. Üyesi S. Armağan GÜLEÇ KORUMAZ∗ Konya Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi Mimarlık Bölümü [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0003-2547-3085 Hatice Mirac AYHAN Konya Teknik Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Öğrencisi [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0001-5413-6753 Özet Sahip olunan kültür mirasını gelecek nesillere aktarmaya yönelik çabaların en önemlilerinden biri de uygun bir fonksiyon ile yapıyı kullanmaktır. Tarihi yapının sahip olduğu değerlerin farkına varılarak kullanılması, kültürel mirasın yaşam sürecini uzatan bir yaklaşımdır. Bu yaklaşımın tersi olarak kültür mirasının sahip olduğu değerleri koruyamayan yeniden kullanım önerileri ise tarihi yapıların özgün kimliklerine zarar vermekte, bazı durumlarda ise geri dönülmez hasarlara sebep olmaktadır. Karaman il merkezinde yer alan, Karamanoğulları Beyliği dönemine ait Hatuniye Medresesi (Melek Hatun, Nefise Hatun) uzun yıllar yeniden kullanım çalışmalarına konu olmuştur. Yapı için önerilen fonksiyonlar kısa süreli işlevsel olmuşsa da kalıcı bir fonksiyon seçilememiş ve farklı nedenlerden dolayı yapı verimli bir şekilde kullanılamamıştır. Her fonksiyon sonrasında yapı kullanılmadan bekletilmiş ve değişik şekillerde zarar görmüştür. Bu makale kapsamında, medrese yapısının tarihi önemine ve geçirdiği müdahalelere yönelik toplu bilgi verilerek, yeniden kullanım olanaklarına yönelik değerlendirmeler yapılmıştır. Araştırma konusu yapının yeniden kullanımına yönelik morfolojik, teknik, fonksiyon ve stratejik değerlendirmelerden oluşmaktadır. Yapının yeniden işlevlendirilmesine yönelik analitik sonuçlar elde edebilmek için SWOT analizi yapılmış, yapının yeniden kullanımında güçlü yönler ile tehditlerin ağırlıklı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Hatuniye Medresesi özelinde anıt eserlerin yeniden kullanım olanaklarına yönelik bir yaklaşım paylaşılmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Cilt 6, Sayı 2
    LIMNOFISH-Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research 6(2): 88-99 (2020) Trophic State Assessment of Brackish Bafa Lake (Turkey) Based on Community Structure of Zooplankton Atakan SUKATAR1 , Alperen ERTAS1* , İskender GÜLLE2 , İnci TUNEY KIZILKAYA1 1Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 35100 Bornova, İzmir, TURKEY 2Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, Burdur, TURKEY ABSTRACT ARTICLE INFO Zooplankton abundance and composition are one of the most important factors RESEARCH ARTICLE which affect the food web in aquatic ecosystems. The purpose of this study was to determine the water quality of Bafa Lake in Turkey, based on zooplankton Received : 25.01.2020 communities. As the study case, Bafa Lake is one of the biggest lake in Turkey, Revised : 15.03.2020 and the lake is quite rich in terms of biodiversity. Bafa Lake is the under effects Accepted : 15.04.2020 of domestic, agricultural and industrial wastes that accumulate and cause the deterioration of ecology in the lake by Büyük Menderes River. With this purpose, Published : 27.08.2020 8 sampling sites were determined and zooplankton samples were collected DOI:10.17216/LimnoFish.680070 monthly for two years. TSINRot index and various versions of diversity indices were used to determine the water quality and ecological status of Bafa Lake. To determine similarities between the stations, the stations were clustered by using * CORRESPONDING AUTHOR UPGMA based on zooplankton fauna. By applying Pearson Correlation, [email protected] correlations between the indices based on zooplankton fauna were assessed. With Phone : +90 506 586 37 92 the identification of collected zooplankton, a total of 73 taxa which belong to groups of Rotifera, Cladocera, Copepoda, and Meroplankton were detected.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcadius 8; (Column
    index INDEX 319 Arcadius 8; (column of) 184 Balat 213–14 Archaeological Museum 93ff Baldwin, Count of Flanders 15 Argonauts, myth of 259, 263, 276 Balıklı Kilisesi 197–98 Major references, in cases where many are listed, are given in bold. Numbers in italics Armenian, Armenians 25, 189, 192, Balkapanı Han 132 are picture references. 193, 241–42, 258, 278; (Cemetery) Baltalimanı 258 268; (Patriarchate) 192 Balyan family of architects 34, 161, 193; Arnavutköy 255 (burial place of) 268 A Alexander, emperor 67 Arsenal (see Tersane) Balyan, Karabet 34, 247 Abdülaziz, sultan 23, 72, 215, 251; Alexander the Great 7; (sculptures of) 96 Ashkenazi Synagogue 228 Balyan, Kirkor 34, 234 (burial place of) 117 Alexander Sarcophagus 94, 95 Astronomer, office of 42 Balyan, Nikoğos 34, 246, 247, 249, Abdülhamit I, sultan 23, 118; (burial Alexius I, emperor 13, 282 At Meydanı (see Hippodrome) 252, 255, 274, 275 place of) 43 Alexius II, emperor 14 Atatürk 24, 42, 146, 237, 248; Balyan, Sarkis 34, 83, 247, 258, 272, Abdülhamit II, sultan 23, 251, 252, Alexius III, emperor 14 (Cultural Centre) 242; (Museum) 243; 267 278; (burial place of) 117 Alexius IV, emperor 15 (statue of) 103 Bank, Ottoman 227 Abdülmecit I, sultan 71, 93, 161, 164, Alexius V, emperor 15 Atik Ali Pasha 171; (mosque of) 119 Barbarossa, pirate and admiral 152, 247; (burial place of) 162 Ali Pasha of Çorlu, külliye of 119–20 Atik Mustafa Paşa Camii 216 250, 250; (burial place of) 250; Abdülmecit II, last caliph 24 Ali Sufi, calligrapher 157, 158 Atik Sinan, architect 130, 155, 212; (ensign
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing at the Galata Bridge, Đstanbul, in 2011-2012
    J. Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment Vol. 18, No.2: 223-237 (2012) RESEARCH ARTICLE Fishing at the Galata Bridge, Đstanbul, in 2011-2012 Nao Iwano 1,2 *, Ayaka Amaha Öztürk 2,3 1Faculity of Marine Science, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Minato-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN 2Faculty of Fisheries, Istanbul University, 34470, Laleli-Istanbul, TURKEY 3Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TUDAV), 34820, Beykoz-Istanbul, TURKEY *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The Galata Bridge, located at the entrance of the Gulf of Golden Horn, Istanbul, is famous for many fishermen fishing from the bridge. The Bridge was visited regularly to collect the information on the fish species and amount caught, fishing equipment, and number of fishermen from March 2011 to March 2012. Trachurus spp. , Spicara spp. and Mugil spp. were typically seen throughout the year. In addition, with seasonal change, 20 fish species were observed. The average number of fishermen was 203 per day, and the estimated total fish catch amount at the Galata Bridge was about 64 tonnes in a year. Number of fishermen found at the Galata Bridge was constant throughout the year. Fishing materials such as fishing rods, fishing lines, baits and fishing weight, were found easily available at the bridge. This is the first systematic study on the fishing and related activities at the Galata Bridge. Keywords: Galata Bridge, Golden Horn, amateur fishing, Istanbul Introduction Generally speaking, Turkish people do not consume much fish compared to the average fish consumption of the world although Turkey is surrounded by the Black Sea, Aegean Sea and Mediterranean Sea, which is a good position to consume various fish and sea food.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hagia Sophia in Its Urban Context: an Interpretation of the Transformations of an Architectural Monument with Its Changing Physical and Cultural Environment
    THE HAGIA SOPHIA IN ITS URBAN CONTEXT: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE TRANSFORMATIONS OF AN ARCHITECTURAL MONUMENT WITH ITS CHANGING PHYSICAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of İzmir Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Architecture by Nazlı TARAZ August 2014 İZMİR We approve the thesis of Nazlı TARAZ Examining Committee Members: ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology _____________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ___________________________ Dr. Çiğdem ALAS 25 August 2014 ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Supervisor, Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ____ ___________________________ ______________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şeniz ÇIKIŞ Prof. Dr. R. Tuğrul SENGER Head of the Department of Architecture Dean of the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Assist.Prof.Dr.Zeynep AKTÜRE for her guidance, patience and sharing her knowledge during the entire study. This thesis could not be completed without her valuable and unique support. I would like to express my sincere thanks to my committee members Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM, Dr. Çiğdem ALAS, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdem ERTEN and Assist. Prof. Dr. Zoltan SOMHEGYI for their invaluable comments and recommendations. I owe thanks to my sisters Yelin DEMİR, Merve KILIÇ, Nil Nadire GELİŞKAN and Banu Işıl IŞIK for not leaving me alone and encouraging me all the time. And I also thank to Seçkin YILDIRIMDEMİR who has unabled to sleep for days to help and motivate me in the hardest times of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Uskudar and Sarayburnu with Tubular Passage Way from Abdulhamit II
    27178 Gul Akdeniz et al./ Elixir His. Preser. 74 (2014) 27178-27188 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Historic Preservation Elixir His. Preser. 74 (2014) 27178-27188 Connecting uskudar and sarayburnu with tubular passage way from abdulhamit II. Period Gul Akdeniz 1, Mehmet Cercis Eri şmi ş1,* and Ahmet Ozan Gezerman 2 1Yildiz Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Istanbul, Turkey. 2Yildiz Technical University, Faculty of Chemical- Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The idea of passing the bosphorus under the sea with a tubular structure is evaluated for the Received: 9 April 2013; period in question. The evidence of the pocess of driling ground between Üsküdar and the Received in revised form: side across is analysed in detail as a proof indicating that this Project was thought to be 15 September 2014; realized. Main questions of the research is as follows. What is the current situation of these Accepted: 25 September 2014; projects. Why was there a need for a tubular passage way? Who were the contactors? What are the Project alternatives? What was the details of design proposals? Why were these Keywords cancelled? What kind of a perspective do these projects supply for today and tomorrow? The Abdülhamit, initial hypothesis before the study is that these projects were a part of governmental renewal Tubular Passage Way, program, these were developed as a solution for the problems of the city and cancelled due Transportation, to war or financial reasons, method is genetic and pragmatic historical research. Up to now, Railway, the subject has not been explained in such detail with the agreement text analysed and Project, sources used.
    [Show full text]