DOCSLIB.ORG

A Sustainable View to Fener ‐ Balat District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Sustainable View to Fener ‐ Balat District Papers A Sustainable View to Fener ‐ Balat District Kishali E. Politecnico di Milano, Building Environment Science Technology (BEST) [email protected] Grecchi M. Politecnico di Milano, Building Environment Science Technology (BEST) [email protected] TRADITIONAL TECHNIQUES AND DISTRICT REHABILITATION Sustainable rehabilitation and preservation strategies in historic quarters Industrialisation, started with Industrial Revolution in mid 18th century by the invention of machines but advanced fast in early 19th century by establishing factories in large areas, has changed various aspects of life in terms of economy, architecture, design, and construction, rate of production, social life and politics. However one aspect, the nature, became very important in architecture field when there have been various and serious problems on four basic elements of planet: earth, air, water and fire. All these elements have been influenced badly after industrialisation period due to high demand for rapid and heavy construction regarding the all aspects above. Nowadays, in architecture it is inevitable to find a link between nature and construction, engineering and design to preserve the resources of life which can be called sustainability. This link is very essential in today's new architectural designs to sustain environment but it is more interesting and difficult to find the sustainable link for historical buildings which were constructed during economical revolutions. The structures were constructed with peculiar technology, serviceability in its own environment and definite district, as the time passes the possibility to withstand changing environment conditions would become complicated. In this paper, historical residential buildings, constructed in 19th century in Fener – Balat Istanbul, Turkey, an important example of cultural heritage district, will be analysed in terms of three different views. First part is devoted to traditional construction techniques, materials and performances of them in building and urban scale in Fener ‐ Balat , the buildings were counted as hybrid structures due to its various materials and techniques during late 19th century, the streets were designed for pedestrians and coaches. The renovation and intervention strategies on performances will be discussed under this title. Second part is the obstacles and solutions for preservation of the area in order to have continuity of historical structure. Consistency of material, shape, architectural details of structures in broad sense urban tissue has been changing by new constructions in the area, occupying the old tissue of district like cancer cell. Besides physical destruction the area has faced another problem, social aspect caused by gentrification. Finally, rehabilitation and sustainability projects to preserve the historical area and consolidate buildings have been done until now are the third issue which will be analysed. Besides, the performances of structural and pathological intervention will be elucidated. In conclusion, possible sustainable suggestion in building and area scale will be listed for the area. 1 Papers 1. INTRODUCTION In 18th century, the entire world have been affected by “Industrial Revolution”, which have continued to 19th and to 20th century with alterations on technological, economical, social and political dimensions of cities. Like every city, Istanbul, capital city of Ottoman Empire underwent an intense phase of economic, socio‐political and urban transformation aimed at the modernization of the old system. Ottoman Government had followed what was happening about the international industry developments and decided to bring the new technologies to country. Especially in the 19th century, many industrial buildings in almost all working branches were constructed in the Ottoman Empire by the government and the private sector (1). As a result of industrial revolution, economic and political developments marked important turning points in the history of the empire. Without any doubt first and important rearrangement law, is done by sultan not by public, unlike in French revolution (2). Political, social and economic changes in Istanbul inevitably result in demographic growth and different urbanisation methodology opposite to vernacular one. Construction methods were carefully detailed in order to reduce the possibility of fires; in 1864, the government decreed that henceforth all construction in the capital was to be in stone or brick and with 1875 regulation divided the capital into primary and secondary zones. In the primary zones, timber construction was forbidden, while in the secondary zones, it was occasionally allowed provided that masonry fire walls were built (2). The 19th century residential buildings, constructed during the reforms to adopt European practices, show different construction techniques, use of functions, material and also bring a new concept of row‐ houses to country, in other words in 19th century residential building constructed with different way: row houses, multi‐storey masonry apartments and multi‐houses around a closed courtyard. In Istanbul, it can be observed that in many districts masonry residential buildings were constructed in 19th century. These construction systems showing minor differences of architecture style and details could be observed in Kuzguncuk, Üsküdar, Kadiköy (Yeldeğirmeni) in Asian part of Istanbul, Fatih (Fener – Balat – Ayvansaray), Galata, Beyoglu, Ortaköy, Şişli in European part of city. Among these districts aforementioned, Fener – Balat region and historic structures were chosen for research on sustainable renovation due to several reasons. First of all, among the districts of Istanbul where 19th century masonry residential buildings are observed, Fener – Balat is the special district in terms of many aspects. In the area, homogenous architectural tissue have been preserved better than the other areas though these 19th century housings had been faced to be destroyed due to fast economic, social and politic changes like in other districts. Second reason of going ahead the research with case of studies from Fener – Balat Rehabilitation Programme is that all interventions were elaborated to be done carefully according to international charters. Next, choosing case studies from Fener – Balat ensure to analyze the conditions of residential buildings before and after rehabilitation programme. Buildings may show different behaviours after they had been undergone structural interventions compared to previous state which provides good occasion to propose future suggestions of sustainable development. Therefore, Fener – Balat, an important example of cultural heritage district, will be analysed in terms of three different views. First part is devoted to traditional construction techniques, materials and performances of them in building and urban scale in Fener ‐ Balat. Second part is the obstacles and solutions for preservation of the area in order to have continuity of historical structure with possible green habitats. Finally, rehabilitation and sustainability projects to preserve the historical area and consolidate buildings have been done until now are the third issue which will be analysed. 2 Papers 2. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT AREA 2.1 Brief History The area had been an important residential and place of resort by Genoese, Venetians and Europeans traders before 1453 when Istanbul was concurred by Fatih Sultan Mehmet. During the first years of Ottoman Empire, demographic changes can be observed in the area that some of local inhabitants left area whereas owing to settlement policy followed by Ottoman Empire in 15th century, Muslim Ottomans and Ottoman minorities such as Armenians and especially Greeks were settled in Fener area (3). The 17th century brought the Hagios Georgios Church, seat of the Greek patriarchy, which results in development and changes in terms of economy and architecture; as for Balat, the neighbourhood was inhabited by Jews to a large extent and by Venetians, Genoese and Armenians to a small extent in that period (4). Moreover, 19th century residential buildings constructed during the reforms for adopting European practices, show different construction techniques, use of functions, material and bring a new concept of row‐houses (2). Therefore, the residential buildings as row housings in Fener – Balat were constructed in th th 19 century with technique of masonry, yet floors designed with timber materials. In 20 century, the most influential migration however occurred after the establishment of the state of Israel; one fourth of the Balat population left the neighbourhood. Despite the move of the prosperous families from the site, Fener preserved its character as a Greek neighbourhood until the 1960s when most of the Greek inhabitants left Istanbul in large numbers due to political reasons. Because of job prospects and low rents, the site became an important destination for new immigrants, mainly the people from the Black Sea region settled down in the area (4). 2.2 Characteristics and Rehabilitation of Area Fener – Balat area, located in historical peninsula are surrounded by Golden Horn, transit road and Byzantine city walls in north; the buildings which were built recently in south; Greek Orthodox patriarch and important monuments of historical peninsula such as Bulgarian church in east; the church, mosque and recent building in west. During last twenty years, recent developments decision have been taken to improve the social and physical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advocacy Planning in Urban Renewal: Sulukule Platform As the First Advocacy Planning Experience of Turkey
    Advocacy Planning in Urban Renewal: Sulukule Platform As the First Advocacy Planning Experience of Turkey A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Community Planning of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning by Albeniz Tugce Ezme Bachelor of City and Regional Planning Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Turkey January 2009 Committee Chair: Dr. David Varady Submitted February 19, 2014 Abstract Sulukule was one of the most famous neighborhoods in Istanbul because of the Romani culture and historic identity. In 2006, the Fatih Municipality knocked on the residents’ doors with an urban renovation project. The community really did not know how they could retain their residence in the neighborhood; unfortunately everybody knew that they would not prosper in another place without their community connections. They were poor and had many issues impeding their livelihoods, but there should have been another solution that did not involve eviction. People, associations, different volunteer groups, universities in Istanbul, and also some trade associations were supporting the people of Sulukule. The Sulukule Platform was founded as this predicament began and fought against government eviction for years. In 2009, the area was totally destroyed, although the community did everything possible to save their neighborhood through the support of the Sulukule Platform. I cannot say that they lost everything in this process, but I also cannot say that anything was won. I can only say that the Fatih Municipality soiled its hands. No one will forget Sulukule, but everybody will remember the Fatih Municipality with this unsuccessful project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hagia Sophia in Its Urban Context: an Interpretation of the Transformations of an Architectural Monument with Its Changing Physical and Cultural Environment
    THE HAGIA SOPHIA IN ITS URBAN CONTEXT: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE TRANSFORMATIONS OF AN ARCHITECTURAL MONUMENT WITH ITS CHANGING PHYSICAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of İzmir Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Architecture by Nazlı TARAZ August 2014 İZMİR We approve the thesis of Nazlı TARAZ Examining Committee Members: ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology _____________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ___________________________ Dr. Çiğdem ALAS 25 August 2014 ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Supervisor, Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ____ ___________________________ ______________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şeniz ÇIKIŞ Prof. Dr. R. Tuğrul SENGER Head of the Department of Architecture Dean of the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Assist.Prof.Dr.Zeynep AKTÜRE for her guidance, patience and sharing her knowledge during the entire study. This thesis could not be completed without her valuable and unique support. I would like to express my sincere thanks to my committee members Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM, Dr. Çiğdem ALAS, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdem ERTEN and Assist. Prof. Dr. Zoltan SOMHEGYI for their invaluable comments and recommendations. I owe thanks to my sisters Yelin DEMİR, Merve KILIÇ, Nil Nadire GELİŞKAN and Banu Işıl IŞIK for not leaving me alone and encouraging me all the time. And I also thank to Seçkin YILDIRIMDEMİR who has unabled to sleep for days to help and motivate me in the hardest times of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fener Greek Patriarchate
    PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS March - May 1998 Volume III - Number 1 THE FENER GREEK PATRIARCHATE A. SUAT BİLGE Dr. A. Suat Bilge is Professor of International Relations and Ambassador (retired). A controversy concerning the Fener Greek Patriarchate started in Turkey in 1997. It was stated that the Patriarchate could be used both for and against the interests of Turkey. On the one hand, it was claimed that the Patriarchate had intentions to establish itself as an ecumenical church and become a state like the Vatican; that the Orthodox world was trying to gain power in Turkey. On the other hand, some people stated that Turkey could benefit from the prestigious position of the Patriarchate and suggested an improvement in its status. First of all, I want to stress that the Patriarchate no longer enjoys the importance it once possessed in Greek-Turkish relations. Today, the Patriarchate is trying to become influential in Turkish-American relations. The Fener Greek Patriarchate is a historical religious institution. After the division of the Roman Empire, it became the church of the Byzantine Empire and obtained the status of an ecumenical church. With the collapse of the Byzantine Empire, the Patriarchate became the church of the Greeks living within the Ottoman Empire. Besides its functions as a religious institution, the Patriarchate was also granted the right to act as a ministry of Greek affairs by Mehmet II. He granted increased authority and privileges to the Patriarch. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the Fener Greek Patriarchate became the church of the Greeks living within the Republic of Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Destination: Turkey
    Destinations / JOURNEY 066-071 Dest.JOURNEY.0517.indd 66 4/10/17 12:22 PM At the crossroads of the world, the layers of history offer an almost impossible list of things to do and see. BY MELANIE HAIKEN 066-071 Dest.JOURNEY.0517.indd 67 4/10/17 12:22 PM Destinations / JOURNEY ’M BLINKING IN the bright sunlight of Taksim ISTANBUL Square, squinting down at a small piece of note- I had a head start here, as Linnea, studying abroad at world- book paper covered with my daughter Linnea’s renowned Boğaziçi University, had already been in Turkey cramped but tidy writing. On one side, an almost for a jam-packed six weeks and had charted a distraction- ridiculously long list of things she says I absolutely free course for me to follow. And thanks to her adventurous Imust do during my time in Istanbul, divided carefully (read: risk-taking) tendencies, I found myself following her into neighborhoods and itineraries. And on the other suggestions to visit places most other tourists miss. side of the paper, step-by-step instructions for catching Take the colorful streets, mosques and cafes of Fener, the funicular and M1 tram that will take me down to the Balat and Fatih, some of Istanbul’s most traditional city’s oldest — and ridiculously picturesque — neigh- Islamic neighborhoods, where chador-clad women borhood, Sultanahmet. On today’s list alone: the Blue throng the markets and men play chess and gossip in the Mosque (officially Sultan Ahmed), multiple museums, cafe-lined squares. Instead of beelining to Chora Church Topkapi Palace with its grand gardens, and the Basilica to see its splendid Byzantine mosaics and frescoes depict- Cistern, the eerie sixth-century underground water ing the life of Christ, I took a ferry to Balat and zigzagged system of Constantinople.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIT NEWSLETTER American Research Institute in Turkey Number 55, Spring 2013
    ARIT NEWSLETTER American Research Institute in Turkey Number 55, Spring 2013 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT President A. Kevin Reinhart Last spring the Council of American Overseas Research Centers (CAORC, based at the Smithson- Immediate Past President ian) kindly provided ARIT the services of a “fund-raising consultant” – Nanette Pyne, an old friend G. Kenneth Sams of mine, as it turns out, from back in my Cairo (ARCE) days. She generously and patiently worked Vice President with Nancy Leinwand and me to teach us the ways of fundraisers. We hope it will bear fruit this year. Nicolas Cahill ARIT was fortunate to receive a grant through the National Endowment for the Humanities, Divi- Secretary sion of Preservation of Access ($40,000) to assist in planning the management of the archives of the Linda Darling American Board of Missions (ABM) that we obtained last year. The American Board was a Protestant Treasurer mission agency founded in 1810 that dispatched missionaries around the world for religious ends Maria deJ. Ellis chiefly, but also to pursue general altruistic labors, including founding schools and medical facilities. Directors Bülent Gültekin Between 1820 when the American Board’s first personnel arrived in Izmir and 1920, at the start of Gottfried Hagen the Turkish Republic, the ABM organization established more than 20 mission stations, 50 boarding Nina J. Köprülü and high schools, and ten colleges in Anatolia and its surrounding areas. Unquestionably, the ABM Kathleen Lynch Beatrice Manz was the most significant American presence in the region during this era. Over the year archivist and Catherine Millard librarian Diane Ryan will twice visit Istanbul to determine the cataloging protocols for the archive, Sylvia Önder and to help set conservation priorities for the materials still in bundles (some still tied with string, Christopher Roosevelt sitting in the climate-controlled vaults of SALT).
    [Show full text]
  • City Relaunch Explore Template V0.1
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 106 Western Districts Neighbourhood Top Five 1 Admiring the exquisite 3 Visiting the Greek Or- 5 Exploring the streets mosaics and frescoes adorn- thodox Patriarchal Church around the Yavuz Sultan ing the interior of one of of St George (p112), one Selim Mosque (p111) in İstanbul’s Byzantine treas- of Turkey’s major pilgrim- the fascinating Çarşamba ures, the Kariye Museum age destinations. district. (Chora Church; p108). 4 Sampling dishes en- 2 Taking a ferry up the joyed by Süleyman the Golden Horn to visit Eyüp Magnificent and other (p113), home to İstanbul’s sultans at Asitane (p115) most important Islamic restaurant. shrine. 111 111 F 11 K 111 a B hr a a 111 h 111 i r 11 a a 111 0400 m K r or a e# C iy Jahudi 00.2 miles Eyüp111ad utür# ğ 11 2 e SÜTLÜCE a 11Mezarlığ1ı Stadı C ç k a C 11 d ad HALICIOĞLU l u B Golden Horn Ku n m a Bridge ba HASKÖY lt EYÜP r u F ah S e (Haliç a s n p h Köprüsü) e ü a C y n a E e d C a d Ay AYVANSARAY H van a sar s TOPÇULAR ay k C ö ad y 1 Old C 1 a d 11 Galata lu o 11 Bridge Y 11 re 111NİŞANC11111İ v111 AVCI 11111 111Çe 11 BEY Sakızağaçi l G 11111111u 111 o l d 11Hava Şe1111111hitlig1 i 111nb 11 BALAT d e ta A n s a y 11111E 111 111İ 111 1 KASIM v dir C a H 1111111ne1 11111 r GÜNANİ n o k a s r 111 111ap 111 1 l a n ı R k r ( 11111111 111am 11a a H i C v y a 111 111a 111 a 1 C li Edirnekapı d S DRAMAN a ç) 11111111 11111 d 111Şehi111tligi 1 1#â# HIZIR FENER 1111111 d ÇAVUŞ a # 111 1111C 4 Ü# ı 3# 1111111p EDİRNEKAPI a F 111 111k 1 et e F KARAGÜMRÜK hiy 1111111n e e C ir v z Karagümrük a d i d E P k d ı SULUKULE a Stadium s S p ş u Ca 11 a a 5#ß# n k BEYCEĞİZ ÇARŞAMBA yu ç 11Topkap1 11ı 1 C k li p a a o d b 11Mezarl11ığı 1 T Ta Ha For more detail of this area see Map p252 A 107 Lonely Planet’s Explore: Western Districts Top Tip It’s a great shame that so few visitors head to this fas- If you plan to visit Fatih, try cinating part of town.
    [Show full text]
  • Ayasofya Müzesi Yilliği Annual of Hagia Sophia Museum
    Ayasofya Müzesi Yayınları: XVII AYASOFYA MÜZESİ YILLIĞI ANNUAL OF HAGIA SOPHIA MUSEUM No:14 İstanbul 2014 AYASOFYA MÜZESİ YAYINLARI: XVII AYASOFYA MÜZESİ YILLIĞI ANNUAL OF HAGIA SOPHIA MUSEUM No: 14 İstanbul 2014 AYASOFYA MÜZESİ YAYINLARI Yayın No:17 Aralık 2014 – İSTANBUL Tasarım ve Uygulama: Nuray Erden Baskı-Cilt: Yılmazlar Basım Adres: Topkapı - İstanbul Tel: 0212 565 56 82 Ön Kapak: Ayasofya “Şehnâme-i Selim Hân” adlı eserden Nakkaş Osman ve Ali Nakkaş 6 Zilhicce 988 (Ocak 1581) Minyatür, 27 x 19 cm İstanbul, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi A.3595, y. 156a. Arka Kapak: Ayasofya Külliyesi- Fotoğraf: Güngör Özsoy - 2005 Yayın Kurulu Prof. Dr. Zeynep AHUNBAY Prof. Dr. Selçuk MÜLAYİM Prof. Dr. Asnu Bilban YALÇIN Ayasofya Müzesi Yıllığı Yazışma Adresi: Ayasofya Müzesi Müdürlüğü Sultanahmet/İstanbul-Türkiye e-posta: [email protected] Adress for Correspondence: Directore of Hagia Sophia Museum Sultanahmet / Istanbul-Turkey e-mail: [email protected] Copyright© Yıllığın bu baskısı için Türkiye’deki yayın hakları AYASOFYA MÜZESİ ’ne aittir. Her hakkı saklıdır. Hiçbir bölümü ve paragrafı kısmen veya tamamen ya da özet halinde fotokopi, faksimile veya başka herhangi bir şekilde çoğaltılamaz, dağıtılamaz. Normal ve kanuni iktibaslarda kaynak gösterilmesi zorunludur. Yıllıktaki makalelerden yazarları sorumludur. AYASOFYA MÜZESİ YILLIĞI ANNUAL OF HAGIA SOPHIA MUSEUM İÇİNDEKİLER Önsöz Yerine Hayrullah CENGİZ, Ayasofya Müzesi Müdür Vekili . 7 Ayasofya İçin Bibliyografya Denemesi Prof. Dr. Selçuk MÜLAYİM . 13 Aya İrini Kilisesi Deprem Performans Değerlendirmesi ve Güçlendirme Projesi Hazırlanması Prof. Dr. Mustafa ERDİK . 50 Tarihi Kaynaklar Işığında Aya Sofya’nın Altıncı Yüzyıl Süslemesine Dair Bazı Notlar Asnu-Bilban YALÇIN . 94 Ayasofya’nın Aydınlatma Analizi Doç. Dr. Mehlika İNANICI .
    [Show full text]
  • Visibility Model of Tangible Heritage. Visualization of the Urban Heritage Environment with Spatial Analysis Methods
    heritage Article Visibility Model of Tangible Heritage. Visualization of the Urban Heritage Environment with Spatial Analysis Methods Elif Sarihan Department of Civil Engineering, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary; [email protected] Abstract: The methodological approach of the study proposes an innovative yet adaptive way to define and preserve heritage sites and their elements. In the case study, the proposed methodology guides the design/planning research of heritage sites by linking the perceptual behaviour with the information of the built environment. Visibility is the tool to measure the level of exposure of specific urban elements from a particular perspective. While isovist analyses define visibility in the built environment, fields of view from the periphery of heritage sites are applied to calculate visible or invisible areas by the observer. The purpose of the current study is the evaluation of the identification of the elements to be protected, by modelling both the heritage environment and the heritage elements according to the visibility criteria. For this purpose, I illustrate my approach by using visibility analyses and Space syntax analysis in the case of the Sulukule neighbourhood, the leading renewal project, in Istanbul. This area used to have notably cultural–historical assets–historic land walls, the lifestyle of Roma people—but now the renovation works carried out in the Sulukule case study site have affected the identity of the “visible” and “known” space of the historic quarter. Keywords: visibility analysis; isovist; field of view; urban heritage; built environment; Istanbul Citation: Sarihan, E. Visibility Model of Tangible Heritage. Visualization of the Urban Heritage Environment with Spatial Analysis Methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conflicted City Hypergrowth, Urban Renewal and Mass Urbanization in Istanbul
    The Conflicted City Hypergrowth, Urban Renewal and Mass Urbanization in Istanbul The Conflicted City Hypergrowth, Urban Renewal and Mass Urbanization in Istanbul Carrie Sturts Dossick Liz Dunn Ian Fishburn Natalie Gualy Kathryn Rogers Merlino Jason Twill The Runstad Fellows wish to express sincere appreciatiation to the following individuals for their supportof this research program: Daniel Friedman, George Rolfe, Suzanne Cartwright, Runstad Center Board of Directors, Melissa Best, AP Hurd, Julia Levitt, Peter Steinbrueck, Reşat Kasaba, Orhan Esen, Ipek Akpinar, Ulas Akin, Haluk Sur, Tuna Kuyucu, Yaren Türkoglu, Ibrahim Baz, Leyla Turanalp, Asu Aksoy, Murat Guvenc, Omer Kanipak Copyright © 2012 PREFACE 06 INTRODUCTION 08 THE CONFLICTED BUILT CITY: OLD CITY /NEW CITY 14 THE SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL DEMOLITION OF ISTANBUL’S INNER CITY NEIGHBORHOODS The 21st Century Republic and the Gecekondu 16 A Selective Seismic Law 18 The Case of Sulukule 19 Tarlabasi, Fener, and Balat 20 ‘Starchitects’ and ‘City Planning’ within Cities 22 THE CONFLICTED ECOLOGICAL CITY: GROWTH CITY / SUSTAINABLE CITY 24 SUSTAINABILITY IN ISTANBUL: “THE ISSUE IS THAT THERE IS NO ISSUE” The Systems of the City 25 Perspectives on Sustainability 28 THE CONFLICTED SOCIO-ECONOMIC CITY: GLOBAL CITY / LOCAL CITY 30 WHAT’S THE ROLE OF REAL ESTATE IN NURTURING “CREATIVE CULTURE” AND LOCAL ENTREPRENEURISM? Istanbul to Foreign Investors 31 The Creative Class of Istanbul 33 CONCLUSION: CITY AT A CROSSROADS 36 REFERENCES 40 ENDNOTES 42 PREFACE In September 2011 the Runstad Center for Real Estate Studies at the University of Washington selected a research fellows group to focus on themes of urbanism, real estate and sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • ISTANBUL the Ancient Constantinople the Ancient Constantinople
    ISTANBUL the ancient Constantinople DAY 1 / Khartoum – Istanbul by night flight and city sightseeing Departure from Khartoum airport with Turkish Airline. Arrival at Istanbul airport, meet and greet with your local guide and transfer to your hotel. Breakfast and city tour. You will proceed discovering the treasures of this amazing city, gateway to the Western and Eastern world. You will visit first the Basilica Cistern , an extraordinary subterranean cistern featuring a wildly atmospheric forest of columns (336 to be exact), vaulted brick ceilings, mysterious carved Medusa-head capitals and ghostly patrols of carp. This amazing building is a testament to the ambitious town planning and engineering expertise of the Byzantines. You will visit then Aya Sofya , a majestic Byzantine basilica. Built by order of the Emperor Justinian in the sixth century AD, its soaring dome, huge nave and glittering gold mosaic contribute to its reputation as one of the world’s most beautiful buildings, and its long and fascinating history as church, mosque and museum makes it the city’s most revealing time capsule. Looted by marauding Crusaders in the 13 th century, stormed by Ottoman invaders during the Conquest in 1453 and visited by millions of tourists since becoming a museum, it is Turkey’s greatest treasure. You will then visit Topkapi Palace , an opulent Ottoman palace complex occupying the promontory of Istanbul’s Old City. A series of mad, sad and downright bad sultans lived here with their concubines and courtiers between 1465 and 1830, and extravagant relics of their centuries of folly, intrigue, excess, patronage, diplomacy and war are everywhere you look.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Fener Balat Historical District in Istanbul
    D. Erbey & A.E. Erbas, Int. J. Sus. Dev. Plann. Vol. 12, No. 3 (2017) 498–507 THE CHALLENGES ON SPATIAL CONTINUITY OF URBAN REGENERATION PROJECTS: THE CASE OF FENER BALAT HISTORICAL DISTRICT IN ISTANBUL D. ERBEY & A.E. ERBAS Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Faculty of Architecture, City and Regional Planning Department, Istanbul, Turkey. ABSTRACT Urban regeneration projects in Turkey are the most important urban issues discussed and have social, economic and environmental aspects. In the last 10 years, many legislative regulations have been cre- ated by the national government in order to achieve urban regeneration. Today, urban space is produced by urban regeneration projects in Istanbul as it is in many other cities in Turkey. Urban regeneration practices are prepared not only for the former brownfield areas of the city but also for the historical urban environment. This raises heritage conservation issues for urban regeneration. The Fener and Balat district is one of the heritage sites located in the historical peninsula of Istanbul. This historical district has important features such as cultural enrichment, maintaining the urban identity and unique urban patterns. The EU-supported ‘District Fener Balat Rehabilitation Program’ was developed for the district after the 1996 Habitat II Conference in Istanbul. Urban regeneration projects have also been prepared for this historic district since 2006. In this paper, the urban regeneration projects for Fener Balat district will be analyzed, and the results will be discussed based on the technical expertise reports of administrative court proceedings and related to some results of the graduate theses supervised by the authors in the last 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey 2007 Robert Phipps I Set Off from London Late on the Evening Of
    Turkey 2007 Robert Phipps I set off from London late on the evening of the 22nd of July and after a transfer in Zurich arrived in the small hours of the morning into Istanbul. Armed with a rough idea of how to get to the hostel I had booked I wasn’t wildly confident, but by chance I met a Turkish student who had been on the same flight. Engin literally walked me the length of Istiklal Caddesi (one of the main shopping streets in Istanbul) to a taxi driver and then promptly haggled and agreed the price for me. This was a kind deed in itself but given the fact it was nearly 4:00am I felt my newly found friend Engin had gone beyond the call of duty. However his kindness was something that I experienced often and throughout the whole of Turkey (a combination of ineptitude on my part with directions and Turkish friendliness) being led to my destination was a common occurrence and was symptomatic of a hospitality that was completely unexpected and contributed to making my five weeks in Turkey. During our late night stroll down Istiklal Caddesi Engin asked me on first impressions how I felt Turkey was different from Europe. The street we were walking down struck me as remarkably European, wide, with a tramline running down its middle and peppered with immediately recognisable shops such as Starbucks and Adidas. However as we turned off the main street onto one of the narrower side shopping streets the shops changed to music stores, not HMV or Virgin Megastore but smaller independently owned shops selling musical instruments as opposed to CDs and computer games.
    [Show full text]