DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Protest On- and Offline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Protest On- and Offline RUSSIAN PROTEST 98 ON- AND OFFLINE THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE MOSCOW OPPOSITION DEMONSTRATIONS IN DECEMBER 2011 Markku Lonkila FIIA BRIEFING PAPER 98 • February 2012 ULKOPOLIITTINEN INSTITUUTTI UTRIKESPOLITISKA INSTITUTET THE FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS RUSSIAN PROTEST ON- AND OFFLINE THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE MOSCOW OPPOSITION DEMONSTRATIONS IN DECEMBER 2011 Markku Lonkila Principal Investigator Department of Social Research FIIA Briefing Paper 98 University of Helsinki February 2012 • Social media played an important role in the Moscow opposition demonstrations in December 2011, functioning both as an alternative arena for public debate and as a tool for mobilising the protests. In a matter of months, the political atmosphere in the country changed and the legitimacy of the Russian power vertical was called into question. • Even before the Duma elections in 2011, social media had turned into an alternative forum for political debate in Russia. These media frayed the image of United Russia and Vladimir Putin, politicised new audiences, and helped to form both a collective ‘anti’ identity and networks among the protesters. • The reports of the falsification of the Duma elections circulated through social media channels and exploded into anger on the part of the betrayed voters. Social media were put to good effect when making the practical arrangements for the protests, such as financing the street demonstrations and recruiting participants. • Albeit crucial in mobilising discontent, social media is less well-suited to building lasting political structures. In the longer run, the conflict-torn opposition has to transform the protests into offline organisations and decide, among other things, who can represent the street protesters in negotiations with the power-holders. • Imposing strict internet control in Russia does not seem likely since the Russian urban middle class is accustomed to seeking information and expressing itself freely on the net. Removing this freedom would lead to an increase in anti-government sentiments and the intensification of protests in big Russian cities. The EU's Eastern Neighbourhood and Russia research programme The Finnish Institute of International Affairs ULKOPOLIITTINEN INSTITUUTTI UTRIKESPOLITISKA INSTITUTET THE FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Even the well-known children's animated character Cheburashka demanded honest elections. Photo: Person Behind The Scenes / Flickr.com. Introduction the December demonstrations. This focus on social media excludes Russian independent professional This paper discusses the events leading up to the print and web media, despite their importance for large street demonstrations against the falsification the protests.2 of the Russian Duma elections in Moscow on 10 and 24 December 2011. The sudden emergence of the pro- The main claim of this paper is that the emergence tests caught prime minister Vladimir Putin’s regime and mobilisation of the street demonstrations was by surprise and revealed its inability to understand greatly facilitated by social media, which functioned both the degree of discontent among the Russian both as an arena for discussion and debate and as urban population and the growing power of social a tool for organising the protests. I maintain that media. Within just a few months, the stagnated social media paved the way for the December street political atmosphere in Russia was electrified and the demonstrations by diffusing alternative information legitimacy of the Russian ruling elite was called into on political events in the country, fraying the image question.1 of the immunity of Vladimir Putin, creating a collec- tive identity against United Russia – dubbed a ‘party This paper centres on the role of social media in of swindlers and thieves’ – and building networks organising the opposition protests in Russia, where between civic actors. When the falsification of the the leeway for civic activism has been on the wane Duma elections was revealed, again through social under the Putin-Medvedev tandem. By social media media, these networks could be used to mobilise I refer to interactive internet and mobile commu- mass protests. nication technologies with user-generated content. I focus in particular on Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, its Russian clone Vkontakte, and the Russian-lan- guage segment of LiveJournal (Zhivoi Zhurnal), all of 2 For studies of social media, politics and civil society in Rus- which were paramount in preparing and organising sia, see e.g. http://blogs.helsinki.fi/lonkila/; Bruce Etling et al. (2010) Public Discourse in the Russian Blogosphere: Map- ping RuNet Politics and Mobilization. Berkman Center Research 1 I would like to thank Risto Alapuro, Angelina Davydova,­ Publication, Harvard University. Available at: http://cyber.law. Vladimir Gel’man, Arkady Moshes, Katri Pynnöniemi, Teija harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Public_Dis- Tiilikainen, Philip Torchinsky, Dmitry Yagodin and the members course_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere_2010.pdf, accessed 8 Feb- of Helsinki Research Group for Political Sociology for their com- ruary 2012; Florian Töpfl (2011) Managing public outrage: Power, ments on earlier versions of this paper. I remain responsible for scandal, and new media in contemporary Russia, New Media & the conclusions and any factual errors in the text. Society, 13(8), 1301–1319. The Finnish Institute of International Affairs 3 Particularities of the Russian-language internet It became, however, extremely popular among the first generation of Russian internet users to Understanding the role of social media and the sud- the extent that it was synonymous with the word den emergence of the Moscow protests warrants a weblog in the Russian language for a long time. In look at the specific features of the Russian-language 2011, Russians were still the second largest group of internet. One of the most important of these fea- LiveJournal users worldwide and Zhivoi Zhurnal had tures is the strong recent and ongoing growth in become a permanent fixture in the Russian blogo- internet and mobile communications, which poses sphere, urban culture, and political debate. a challenge to broadcasts by the state-controlled national TV channels. This growth is illustrated by In terms of civic and political activism, LiveJour- the increase in the daily internet audience among nal’s built-in networking functions are particularly adult Russians from 22% in 2009 to 35% in 2011, and important: the user can link their blog both to those by the increase in the weekly audience from 32% to of other users and to the innumerable Zhivoi Zhurnal 44%.3 This growth has coincided with an explosion in communities, whose topics cover a wide spectrum the use of mobile communication resulting, among of issues from art and hobbies to politics. Thanks to other things, in the important role played by Twitter this networked structure, a political Zhivoi Zhurnal in the December protests. Despite the strong growth, blogger in Russia runs less risk of drowning in the internet use is divided according to age, geographical endless ocean of individual, isolated blogs. Instead, location, and socio-economic factors. It is no coin- the blogger is included in a virtual community cidence that the protests were strongest in the big which embraces an important part of the Russian Russian cities, notably in Moscow, where internet intelligentsia within one interconnected technical penetration is at its highest. platform. Second, the Russian-language internet is relatively Zhivoi Zhurnal has also been an important tool for isolated from the global internet. Despite the com- the practical organisation of resistance: several monly held belief, the internet is not a homogeneous opposition demonstrations have been mobilised sphere where everyone may freely communicate through Zhivoi Zhurnal communities, which have with everyone else. Rather, internet use in Russia also published accounts, photos and videos of the and elsewhere is conditioned by its historical devel- violent harassment of demonstrators by the Russian opment, language barrier, and political and cultural law enforcement agencies. In the December 2011 context. This development has shaped the Russian demonstrations, however, the organising role of blogosphere into a relatively closed cultural commu- Zhivoi Zhurnal was challenged by the newer social nity of Russian citizens and Russian-speaking dias- network sites such as Facebook and Vkontakte, as pora around the world. The inward-oriented nature will be described in the fourth section in this paper. of this community is illustrated by the fact that the Russian-language internet is commonly dubbed Finally, Russia is one of the few countries in the ‘Runet’ by its users (imagine Finnish internet users world where Facebook is not the leading social calling the internet ‘Finnet’). network site. Instead, its lookalike Russian clone Vkontakte (In contact) was a clear leader with 27.8 The third specificity of Runet is the significance of million visitors in 2010, followed by Odnoklassniki the Russian-language segment of the LiveJournal (16.7 million), whereas Facebook, despite its blogging platform and social network site (Zhivoi impressive growth figure, was only fifth with 4.5 Zhurnal or ZhZh in Russian), both for Russian urban million visitors.4 Many users have accounts both in culture in general and for civic activism in particular. Vkontakte and Facebook, but the popularity of the LiveJournal was one of the first
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Organized Crime 1.1 Gaizer’S Criminal Group
    INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER I. ORGANIZED CRIME 1.1 Gaizer’s Criminal Group ..................................................................................6 1.2 Bandits in St. Petersburg ............................................................................ 10 1.3 The Tsapok Gang .......................................................................................... 14 Chapter II.CThe Corrupt Officials 2.1 «I Fell in Love with a Criminal» ................................................................20 2.2 Female Thief with a Birkin Bag ...............................................................24 2.3 «Moscow Crime Boss».................................................................................29 CONTENTS CHAPTER III. THE BRibE-TAKERS 3.1 Governor Khoroshavin’s medal «THE CRIMINAL RUSSIA PARTY», AN INDEPENDENT EXPERT REPORT «For Merit to the Fatherland» ..................................................................32 PUBLISHED IN MOSCOW, AUGUST 2016 3.2 The Astrakhan Brigade ...............................................................................36 AUTHOR: ILYA YASHIN 3.3 A Character from the 1990s ......................................................................39 MATERiaL COMPILING: VERONIKA SHULGINA HAPTER HE ROOKS TRANSLATION: C 4. T C EVGENia KARA-MURZA 4.1 Governor Nicknamed Hans .......................................................................42 GRAPHICS: PavEL YELIZAROV 4.2 The Party
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media and Civil Society in the Russian Protests, December 2011
    Department of Informatics and Media Social Science – major in Media and Communication Studies Fall 2013 Master Two Years Thesis Social Media and Civil Society in the Russian Protests, December 2011 The role of social media in engagement of people in the protests and their self- identification with civil society Daria Dmitrieva Fall 2013 Supervisor: Dr. Gregory Simons Researcher at Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies 1 2 ABSTRACT The study examines the phenomenon of the December protests in Russia when thousands of citizens were involved in the protest movement after the frauds during the Parliamentary elections. There was a popular opinion in the Internet media that at that moment Russia experienced establishment of civil society, since so many people were ready to express their discontent publically for the first time in 20 years. The focus of this study is made on the analysis of the roles that social media played in the protest movement. As it could be observed at the first glance, recruiting and mobilising individuals to participation in the rallies were mainly conducted via social media. The research analyses the concept of civil society and its relevance to the protest rhetoric and investigates, whether there was a phenomenon of civil society indeed and how it was connected to individuals‘ motivation for joining the protest. The concept of civil society is discussed through the social capital, social and political trust, e- democracy and mediatisation frameworks. The study provides a comprehensive description of the events, based on mainstream and new media sources, in order to depict the nature and the development of the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Presents a Film by Lise Birk Pedersen
    presents A Film by Lise Birk Pedersen 2011 / Denmark-Russia / 85 min. / Color / Russian with English subtitles A Kino Lorber Release from Kino Lorber, Inc. 333 West 39 St., Suite 503 New York, NY 10018 Publicity Contact: Rodrigo Brandao Director of Publicity Kino Lorber, Inc. [email protected] (212) 629-6880 ext. 12 CREDITS Special thanks to Maria Drokova & Oleg Kashin Director Lise Birk Pedersen Producer Helle Faber Cinematographer Lars Skree Editors Janus Billeskov Jansen Steen Johannessen Sound design Peter Albrechtsen Music Tobias Hylander Production managers (Copenhagen) Mathilde Hvid Lippmann, Nanna Van Elk Production manager (Moscow) Sergey Brovkin Local assistants (Moscow) Maria Pistunova, Yana Lebedikhina, Dmitry Saltykovsky Translations Sergey Brovkin Maria Pistunova Yana Lebedikhina Graphics Kasper Soderlund/Electric Parc Colorgrading Lasse Marcussen/Cameo Film Technical coordinator Adam Bendixen Jonas Abildgaard Produced by Monday Production in association with made in copenhagen in co-production with DR2/Mette Hoffmann Meyer & ITVS International/EP Sally Jo Fifer with the support from The Danish Film Institute/Jesper Jack Media Slatefunding Nordic Film & TV Fund/Karolina Ledin Danish Ministry of Education NRK UR YLE DBS/YES VPRO A Kino Lorber Release SYNOPSIS Nashi is an increasingly popular political youth organization with direct ties to the Kremlin. Officially, its goal is to support the current political system by creating a future elite among the brightest and most loyal Russian teenagers. But their agenda is also to keep the political opposition from spreading their views among the Russians. We meet 19-year-old Masha, a Nashi commissar and spokesperson. Masha is a middle class girl and her family lives, like any other average Russian, in a small flat in the outskirts of Moscow.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaten up for Speaking
    BEATEN UP FOR SPEAKING OUT AttAcks oN hUmAN RIghts dEfENdERs IN thE RUssIAN fEdERAtIoN Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal declaration of human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2011 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson house 1 Easton Street London Wc1X 0dW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2011 Index: EUR 46/038/2011 English Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo : People hold portraits of journalist and environmental activist mikhail Beketov as they take part in a protest against a November 2008 attack in Khimki by unknown assailants in which he was severely beaten and left for dead. he spent three weeks in a coma, had one leg amputated and lost his ability to speak.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of the Putin Consensus Ben Judah and Andrew Wilson
    M P o e L M i CY The end of The o PuTin Consensus Ben Judah and Andrew Wilson Since December, Russia has been rocked by mass protests SU The “Putin consensus” of the 2000s is over. demanding clean elections and an end to the culture of Although Prime Minister Vladimir Putin is immunity on corruption. After a decade of over-control, certain to win a hollow victory in the Russian Russia is undergoing a process of re-politicisation. After presidential elections in March, the current the financial crisis exposed Russia’s chronic governance MMARY electoral cycle has weakened his authority and crisis and its dashed dreams of being a rising economic shown the fragility of his regime. Russia is undergoing a process of re-politicisation and is power, as ECFR argued in Dealing with a Post-BRIC entering a phase of “late Putinism” that is likely Russia, the “Putin consensus” has broken down and to be characterised by elite divisions, continued the “Putin majority” in society has decayed.1 However, protests and a gradual ebbing away of popular although Russia is restless, it is not yet revolutionary. support. The protest movement that erupted There is still a passive Putin plurality, largely drawn from after the falsified vote in the parliamentary the older, poorer and more provincial parts of society election in December has not yet challenged that are frightened of change and see no alternative to Putin’s grip on power but is nevertheless a symptom of an increasingly unstable Russia. Putin. The protest movement remains a minority, but it is concentrated in the country’s most dynamic demographics The European Union should see the current – particularly among Muscovites the new middle classes, crisis as a clear signal that the Putin system will the young and the cultural elites.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia 2015 Human Rights Report
    RUSSIA 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Russian Federation has a highly centralized, authoritarian political system dominated by President Vladimir Putin. The bicameral Federal Assembly consists of a directly elected lower house (State Duma) and an appointed upper house (Federation Council), both of which lacked independence from the executive branch. The State Duma elections in 2011, the presidential election in 2012, and the regional elections during the year were marked by accusations of government interference and manipulation of the electoral process. Security forces generally reported to civilian authorities, although in some areas of the North Caucasus, especially Chechnya, civilian authorities did not maintain effective control over the security forces. During the year the occupation and purported “annexation” of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in March 2014 continued significantly and negatively to affect the human rights situation. The government continued to train, equip, and supply pro- Russian forces in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of eastern Ukraine, who were joined by numerous fighters from Russia. International monitors and human rights nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) attributed thousands of civilian deaths and injuries, as well as widespread human rights abuses, to combined Russian- separatist forces in the Donbas region and the Russian occupation authorities in Crimea (for details see the Country Reports on Human Rights for Ukraine). Russian law has de facto applied in Ukraine’s Crimea since the occupation and purported “annexation” of the peninsula in March 2014. The government utilized the conflict to stoke nationalism and stifle dissent domestically. On February 27, opposition politician and former deputy prime minister Boris Nemtsov was shot and killed near the Kremlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Youth
    Putin’s Youth: Nashi and the Pro-Regime Youth Movement in Russia, 2000-2012 Angela Lee Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in History May 2013 © 2013 Angela Lee Table of Contents page I. Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………………iii II. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………1 III. Background: The Komsomol, 1918-1991 ……………………….………………...…………4 IV. Chapter 1: Idushchie Vmeste, 2000-2005……………………………………...……………17 V. Chapter 2: Nashi Emerges, 2005-2008………………………………….…………………..31 VI. Chapter 3: Nashi Recedes, 2008-2012…………………………….………………………...55 VII. Conclusion.…………………………………………………………………………………..66 VIII. Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………69 ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Nina Tumarkin for her patience, sound guidance, and endlessly good humor. I would also like to thank all my History professors at Wellesley for their dedication to teaching and their passion for the subject, and also to the Russian Language Department for making the process of learning Russian a joy during this past year. I am grateful to those who were part of the History Honors Thesis Seminar for the rich discussions and thought-provoking questions. I am thankful to Professors Mark Kramer, Ivan Kurilla, Valerie Sperling, and Elizabeth Wood for their willingness to direct me to the right sources for my research. And finally, I am indebted to the love and support of my parents and siblings for all these years. iii Introduction “The question for Russia now is what to do next. How can we make the new, market
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Background and U.S. Policy
    Russia: Background and U.S. Policy Cory Welt Analyst in European Affairs August 21, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44775 Russia: Background and U.S. Policy Summary Over the last five years, Congress and the executive branch have closely monitored and responded to new developments in Russian policy. These developments include the following: increasingly authoritarian governance since Vladimir Putin’s return to the presidential post in 2012; Russia’s 2014 annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region and support of separatists in eastern Ukraine; violations of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty; Moscow’s intervention in Syria in support of Bashar al Asad’s government; increased military activity in Europe; and cyber-related influence operations that, according to the U.S. intelligence community, have targeted the 2016 U.S. presidential election and countries in Europe. In response, the United States has imposed economic and diplomatic sanctions related to Russia’s actions in Ukraine and Syria, malicious cyber activity, and human rights violations. The United States also has led NATO in developing a new military posture in Central and Eastern Europe designed to reassure allies and deter aggression. U.S. policymakers over the years have identified areas in which U.S. and Russian interests are or could be compatible. The United States and Russia have cooperated successfully on issues such as nuclear arms control and nonproliferation, support for military operations in Afghanistan, the Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs, the International Space Station, and the removal of chemical weapons from Syria. In addition, the United States and Russia have identified other areas of cooperation, such as countering terrorism, illicit narcotics, and piracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Decoding the Wagner Group: Analyzing the Role of Private Military Security Contractors in Russian Proxy Warfare
    November 2019 Decoding the Wagner Group: Analyzing the Role of Private Military Security Contractors in Russian Proxy Warfare Candace Rondeaux Last edited on November 05, 2019 at 11:41 a.m. EST Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Peter Bergen and It is worth noting that some of the best research Daniel Rothenberg, co-directors of the New America/ produced about the Wagner Group and Russian Arizona State University Future of War project for private military security contractors has been their support throughout the production of this paper. produced by anonymous open source intelligence A deep debt of gratitude is owed to David Sterman researchers, human rights activists and investigative for applying his sharp editorial eye to the text and journalists in Ukraine, Russia, Syria, and elsewhere. sharing his analytical intuition throughout the This paper would not be what it is without their brave research for this report. I also benefited greatly efforts to hold power to account and the extensive Sergey Sukhankin’s research on Russian military advice and help of so many people, many of whom affairs and the Wagner Group and his direct could not be named here due to security concerns. contributions to the historical sections of this report All errors of fact or interpretation are, of course, the covering Moscow’s Cold War strategy in the Middle author’s alone. East elevated the analysis greatly. Navvar Saban’s research on private security contractors and pro- Assad militias likewise helped answer critical questions about Russia’s influence over local proxy forces in Syria. Christopher Miller, Mike Eckel, and many other long-time Russia hands who have spent time living and covering the Kremlin and the conflict in Ukraine were essential sounding boards and critical pillars of support throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksandr Dugin's Neo-Eurasianism and the Russian-Ukrainian
    Chapter 9 Aleksandr Dugin’s Neo-Eurasianism and the Russian-Ukrainian War Anton Shekhovtsov The Russian-Ukrainian war1 began in late February 2014, when Russian troops and special-operation units started the military occupation of Ukraine’s Autonomous Republic of Crimea. The occupation was a covert operation: Moscow denied any involvement, arguing that these were native, that is, Crimean, insurgents who seized regional governmental buildings and blocked the work of official Ukrainian offices, police and military bases. The whole process of foreign occupation was described by Moscow as an indigenous political development.2 The occupation forces installed their own “authori- ties” of Crimea and held an illegitimate referendum on the separation of Crimea from Ukraine on 16 March 2014 in a move that was interpreted by the Council of the European Union as “clear breach of the UN Charter and the OSCE Helsinki Final Act, as well as of Russia’s specific commitments to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity under the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 and the bilateral Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership of 1997.”3 A month later, on 17 April, Russia’s president Vladimir Putin admitted the deployment of Russian troops in this Ukrainian republic.4 The initial denial of Russia’s military involvement in Crimea was important: not only did it confuse the international community – although few Western, let alone Ukrainian, leaders actually doubted this involvement – but it also bought Russia time to swiftly replace the Ukrainian authorities with Russian or Russia-controlled ones. The Crimean operation can be described as an act of Russia’s hybrid warfare – that is, blending conventional and irregular approaches – against Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Presents a Film by Lise Birk Pedersen
    presents A Film by Lise Birk Pedersen 2011 / Denmark-Russia / 85 min. / Color / Russian with English subtitles A Kino Lorber Release from Kino Lorber, Inc. 333 West 39 St., Suite 503 New York, NY 10018 Publicity Contact: Rodrigo Brandao Director of Publicity Kino Lorber, Inc. [email protected] (212) 629-6880 ext. 12 CREDITS Special thanks to Maria Drokova & Oleg Kashin Director Lise Birk Pedersen Producer Helle Faber Cinematographer Lars Skree Editors Janus Billeskov Jansen Steen Johannessen Sound design Peter Albrechtsen Music Tobias Hylander Produced by Monday Production in association with made in copenhagen in co-production with DR2/Mette Hoffmann Meyer & ITVS International/EP Sally Jo Fifer with the support from The Danish Film Institute/Jesper Jack Media Slatefunding Nordic Film & TV Fund/Karolina Ledin Danish Ministry of Education NRK UR YLE DBS/YES VPRO A Kino Lorber Release SYNOPSIS Nashi is an increasingly popular political youth organization with direct ties to the Kremlin. Officially, its goal is to support the current political system by creating a future elite among the brightest and most loyal Russian teenagers. But the organization also works to prevent the political opposition from spreading their views among young people. Nineteen-year-old Masha, a Nashi commissar and spokesperson, is a middle class girl who lives with her family in a small flat in the outskirts of Moscow. Young and ambitious, she joined Nashi at the age of 16 and quickly moved to the very top of the organization, becoming the protege of Russia's Minister of Youth. According to the opposition, Masha belongs to a well-mannered and democratic faction of Nashi.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin.War-Eng
    An Independent Expert Report Foreword The assassination of Boris Nemtsov February 27, 2015 Boris’ report, “Winter Olympics in the Sub-Tropics: was both shocking and not shocking at the same time. To Corruption and Abuse in Sochi,” detailed allegations of know that the life of someone whom you liked and respected rampant corruption in preparation for the 2014 Sochi Winter so much was taken violently and suddenly was a shock. At Olympics. I had the privilege of appearing with Boris and the same time, knowing how the Putin regime has demonized several other brave Russians in a panel discussion on that Russian opposition figures and critics – describing them as report in May 2013 in Washington, DC. I participated part of a “fifth column”, or enemy of the state, seeking to knowing I lived in the safety of the United States; they were overthrow the government and using nationwide television to returning home to Russia, with an uncertain future ahead of blacken their reputations – it is no surprise that Boris paid the them. ultimate price. Indeed, the environment that Putin has Boris’ last project was one, tragically, that he did not live created condones, if not encourages, violence against anyone to see come to fruition. “Putin. War” compiles information bold enough to criticize the country’s leaders. and evidence on Putin’s war on and in Ukraine (which the Few were more relentless and courageous than Boris in Russian leader, of course, denies). It exposes the exposing abuses of the party in power. While we may never involvement of Russian forces in the fighting in Ukraine, know who was behind his assassination, we do know that he tallies Russian casualties, calculates the economic and persevered in reporting on the corruption and human rights financial costs of the war for Russia, describes the atrocities violations of the Putin regime despite threats to his liberty committed by Russian-supported fighters, and reveals the and ultimately to his life.
    [Show full text]