DOCSLIB.ORG

An Open Letter on Science to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Open Letter on Science to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper An Open Letter on Science to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper October 21, 2014 The Right Honourable Stephen Harper Office of the Prime Minister 80 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON Canada K1A 0A2 Dear Prime Minister Harper, As scientists outside of Canada committed to international cooperation in confronting threats to the planet and human health, we urge you to remove excessive and burdensome restrictions and barriers to scientific communication and collaboration faced by Canadian government scientists. Meeting today's complex environmental and public health challenges requires the full participation of scientists around the globe. But recent reports (i, ii, iii) highlight a rapid decline in freedoms and funding extended to Canadian government scientists, which make it more difficult for them to continue research, communicate scientific information and expertise, and collaborate internationally. A recent New York Times editorial, referencing the rapid development of the Alberta oil sands, went so far as to describe new communications restrictions on government scientists as "an attempt to guarantee public ignorance." Canada's leadership in basic research, environmental, health, and other public science is in jeopardy. We urge you to restore government science funding and the freedom and opportunities to communicate these findings internationally. Sincerely, [815 scientists from 32 countries listed below] (i) The Big Chill: Silencing Public Interest Science, A Survey. 2013. The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada. Available online at http://www.pipsc.ca/bigchill. (ii) Vanishing Science: The Disappearance of Canadian Public Interest Science. 2014. The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada. Available online at http://www.pipsc.ca/vanishingscience. (iii) Muzzling Government Scientists: A Threat to Democracy. Democracy Watch and University of Victoria Environmental Law Clinic. Available online at http://democracywatch.ca/wp-content/uploads/OpenGovReportJan2113.pdf. ARGENTINA Alejandro Bianchi, Ph.D. research Director, Hydrographic Office and University of Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Val Hindle, M.D. SMO, GEBA Buenos Aires Ana Malizia, Ph.D. Professor, Mar del Plata National University Mar Del Plata Virginia Palastanga, Ph.D. CONICET-UBA Buenos Aires AUSTRALIA Beth Fulton, Ph.D. Head of ecosystem modeling, CSIRO Lucaston Lance Hill, Ph.D. Professor, UPNG Cairns, Old Joanna Jones (Kain) Visiting Fellow, Australian National University Canberra, Act Michael Nordstrom, Ph.D. Associate Professor, University of Adelaide Wayville Dominique Roche, Ph.D. Postdoc, Australian National University Canberra Karen Wilson, M.S. Senior Research Scientist, National Herbarium of NSW Sydney Trevor Wilson, Ph.D. Doctor, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust Petersham AUSTRIA Bano Mehdi, Ph.D. candidate PhD Candidate, McGill University Vienna BANGLADESH M. Zahidul Haque, M.S. Professor, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University Dhaka Mahfuja Parven Parven, M.S. Secretriate/Assistant Director of Asia, IHRC/GWO/IYC Dhaka BELGIUM Filip Volckaert, Ph.D. Professor and lab director, University of Leuven Leuven BRAZIL Orlando Necchi Jr, Ph.D. Professor, Sao Paulo State University S. Jose Rio Preto CHILE Francisco Matus, Ph.D. Professor, La Frontera University Temuco Jorge Medina, Ph.D. candidate Universidad de La Frontera Temuco Mauricio Molina, Ph.D. Researcher, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria Santiago CHINA Liuming Hu, Ph.D. Deputy Executive officer, East China Normal University Shanghai CROATIA Ognjen Culic, Ph.D. University of Zagreb Zagreb CZECH REPUBLIC Pavel Kram, Ph.D. Ph.D., Czech Geological Survey Prague Jaroslav Vrba, Ph.D. Professor, University of South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice DENMARK Chelsea Chisholm, M.S. PhD Candidate, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Jannik Hansen, M.S. Scientific officer, Aarhus University Copenhagen EGYPT Naglaa Abdallah, Ph.D. Professor and Head Department of Genetic, Faculty of Agriculture Cairo Essam Hassan Mohamed Ahmed, Ph.D. Director, EEAA Cairo FRANCE Patrice Guillotreau, Ph.D. Professor, Université de Nantes Nantes Marta Coll, Ph.D. Professor, IRD Sete Fritz Schuster Agrobase-Logigram St Julien En Genevois Isabelle Veissier, Ph.D. Research director, INRA Saine-Genes-Champanelle GERMANY Hans-Peter Grossart, Ph.D. Professor, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology Stechlin Bernd Hezel, Ph.D. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Res Potsdam Jens Kattge, Ph.D. Max Planck Institute Jena Clara Mendoza-Lera, M.S. PhD Candidate, BTU-Cottbus Senftenberg Cottbus Ryan North, Ph.D. Research Scientist, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geestacht Hamburg Dietrich Schwaegerl Prof. em., Munich University of Applied Sciences Ottobrunn GUINEA Ibrahima Diallo, M.D. Researcher, CNSHB Conakry INDIA Nagamani Sukumar, Ph.D. Professor, Shiv Nadar University Dadri ISRAEL Dror Angel, Ph.D. University of Haifa Haifa ITALY Gabriele Guidi, Ph.D. Professor, Politecnico di Milano Milano, MI Günther Seufert, Ph.D. Senior scientist, EC Joint Research Centre Gemonio LIBYA Almahdi Aliaitwish, Ph.D. Professor, non-governmental organization Tripoli, LA MEXICO Pablo De La Mora, Ph.D. Researcher, Facultad de Ciencias Antonio F. Sarmiento Galan, Ph.D. Professor, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Cuernavaca, Morelos NETHERLANDS Peter Verhaert, Ph.D. Professor, Delft University of Technology Delft NEW ZEALAND Michael Atkinson, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Otago University Dunedin Robert Hickman, M.S. Aquaculture Scientist, National Institute of Water & Atmosphere Wellington Peter Hollings, Ph.D. Retired, Cancer Society of New Zealand Wellington NORWAY Bjørn Ådlandsvik, Ph.D. Principal Scientist, Institute of Marine Research Bergen Heleen De Wit, Ph.D. Senior research scientist, Norwegian institute for Water Research Oslo Kenneth Drinkwater, Dr. P.H. Senior Scientist, Institute of Marine Research Bergen Godtfred Anker Halvorsen, M.S. Research scientist, Uni Research Bergen Jeppe Kolding, Ph.D. A/professor, University of Bergen Bergen Einar Lilleeng, Ph.D. Formulation manager, BioMar Group Haugesund Lisa Maddison, M.S. IMBER Bergen Geir Ottersen, Ph.D. Principal scientist, Institure of Marine Research Oslo Karin Pittman, Ph.D. Professor, University of Bergen Bergen S LOVAK REPUBLIC Miroslav Hain, Ph.D. head of department, IMS Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Juraj Kubica, Ph.D. Research Coordinator, Slovak University of Technology Bratislava SOUTH AFRICA Neil Griffin, Ph.D. Dr, Rhodes University Grahamstown Moenieba Isaacs, Ph.D. Professor, University of Western Cape Cape Town Astrid Jarre, Ph.D. Prof, University of Cape Town Rondebosch Lynne Shannon, Ph.D. Chief Research Officer, Marine Research Institute Cape Town Martin Smit, M.S. Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch SPAIN Jose Babarro, Ph.D. Scientist, CSIC Vigo Joan Cerda, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist, IRTA-CSIC Barcelona Daniel Gil-Pérez, Ph.D. Professor, Universitat de València Alboraia Manuel Manchado, Dr. P.H. Researcher, IFAPA El Pto Sta Maria Gonzalo Martinez-Rodriguez, Ph.D. Researcher, Spanish Council for Scientific Research Puerto Real - Cadiz Francesc Piferrer, Ph.D. Professor, Institute of Marine Sciences-CSIC Barcelona Jeroen Steenbeek, M.S. IT system architect, Ecopath International Initiative Sant Cugat Del Valles Manuel Yufera, Ph.D. Professor, Spanish National Research Council Puerto De Santa Maria SWEDEN Georg K.S. Andersson, Ph.D. Researcher, Lund University Dalby Mirco Bundschuh, Ph.D. Assistant Prof, Swedish University of Agricultural Science Uppsala Jens Fölster, Ph.D. Associate professor, Swedish University of Agricultural Science Uppsala Nike Henriksson, M.S. University of Gothenburg Goteborg Richard Johnson, Ph.D. Professor, SLU Uppsala SWITZERLAND Tim Haye, Ph.D. Section Head, CABI Delémont Marco Moretti, Ph.D. Researcher, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Bellinzona Marie-Eve Randlett, Ph.D. candidate PhD candidate, ETH Zurich Zurich TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Caleb Lewis, M.P.H. candidate MPhil candidate, University of the West Indies Chagaunas UNITED KINGDOM Sara Bárrios, M.S. candidate Royal botanic gardens Kew London Neeltje Boogert, Ph.D. Research Fellow, University of St. Andrews Cambridge Kathryn Elmer, Ph.D. Lecturer, University of Glasgow Glasgow Christopher Hassall, Ph.D. Lecturer in Animal Biology, University of Leeds Leeds Claire Henderson, Ph.D. Clinical Senior Lecturer, King's College London London Sheila Heymans, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer and Head of Ecology, Scottish Association for Marine Science Oban Jennifer Houle, Ph.D. Research Fellow, Queen's University Belfast Belfast Trevor Hughes, Ph.D. Dr & Higher Education Tutor, Luton Sixth Form College Luton Brian Moss, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor, University of Liverpool Liverpool Tim Woolmington, B.A./B.S. Senior Research Engineer, BP Wells Chris Illidge, Ph.D. Principal Scientist Amersham Crispin Jordan Edinburgh UNITED STATES William Scott Armbruster, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist, University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, AK Russell Hocproft, Ph.D. Professor, University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK Olivia Lee, Ph.D. , University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, AK Martha K. Raynolds, Ph.D. Dr., University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, AK Michael Stekoll, Ph.D. Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, AK Benjamin Williams, Ph.D. candidate Ph.D. candidate, University of Alaska Fairbanks Anchorage, AK Douglas Brooks, M.S. Microbiological Curtor, The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL Janna Y. Owens, Ph.D. Environmental Scientist, Chaac Water
Load more

Recommended publications
  • [Relief of Citizens of Oregon, Idaho, and Washington.]
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 12-14-1893 [Relief of Citizens of Oregon, Idaho, and Washington.] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation S. Rep. No. 110, 53d Cong., 2nd Sess. (1894) This Senate Report is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 53D CONGRESS,} SENATE. REPORT ,'Jd Session. { No.110. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. DECEMBER 14, 1893.-0rdered to be printed. Mr. MANDERSON (on behalf of Mr. DAVIS), from the Committee on Military Affairs, submitted the following REPORT: [To accompany S. 743.] The Committee on Military Affairs, to whom was referred the bill (S. 743) for the relief of the citizens of the States of Oregon, Idaho, and Washington, who served with the United States troops in the war against the Nez Perces and Bannock and Shoshone Indians, and for the relief of the heirs of those killed in such service, having duly con­ sidered the same, respectfully report: This biJI is identical in terms with the amended bill before the com­ mittee at the last Congress, and which, as amended, received the favor­ able report of the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Benefit Society Secretary of the Treasury.—Wil­ the Most Ol and with Such Apparent Success As the World Seldom Sees
    credit to our State. All *orts of ex­ ft 001) ItfVEIl TIMES pedients have been resorted to to raise | * NOTICE. RAII-Et. IDAHO. money and to get work done. There is no denying that unusual business Milwaukee, F tb r u a x y 1£>, 1389. FHIDS?..................................................... M ARCH 8. >(ts» tact o f a certain kind has been dis­ played, but it has not been of a cred­ To All to Wliom This Shall Coma: This is to certify that Mr. William J . Knight itable sort. Too many men have THE CABINET. has been appointed tho general superintendsnt SECURITY been ruined by trying to fulfill con­ and manager of all the property of the Champlain President Harrison has sent in to tracts and too many times men have Mining and Prospecting Company. B oarding S chool the Senate the names of the members lmd to shave their vouchers down to And all persons having in possession any of the a low figure to get something for hard property of said company are hereby directed to of his Cabinet. They were promptly forthwith surrender the possession thereof to him. labor performed for this cotnpanv. confirmed, as follows: And allot the employes of this company are They hail little else to work with but hereby directed to look to Mr. Knight only for Girls Young Ladies Secretary of State. — Janies G. not overvaluable laud grants and over­ instructions, and to follow his direction In all o f Blaine, of Maine. sharp wits, and these they have made the business of this company, so long as they are SALT LAKE CITY.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Government
    Federal Government US Capitol Building Photo courtesy of Architect of the Capitol Congressional Districts 46 IDAHO BLUE BOOK U.S. Congress Article I of the U.S. Constitution states agencies to determine if they are following that, “All legislative Powers herein granted government policy, and may introduce new shall be vested in a Congress of the United legislation based on what they discover. States, which shall consist of a Senate and Bills accepted by both houses of Con- a House of Representatives.” This bicam- gress and by the President become law. eral legislature (a governing body with two However, the President may veto a bill and houses) is the primary lawmaking body in return it to Congress. Congress then reviews the U.S. government. To solve problems, the reasons for the rejection but may still Federal Members of Congress introduce legislative act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution proposals called bills or resolutions. After allows Congress to override the President’s considering these proposals Members vote veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both to adopt or to reject them. Members of the House and the Senate. Congress also review the work of executive Members of Congress Members of the Senate and of the House elected for a period of six years, while of Representatives are known respectively representatives are elected for a period as senators and representatives. Each of two years. Furthermore, senators and Member of Congress is elected by representatives must meet the following receiving the greatest number of votes minimum requirements: in the general election.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Warren, Idaho: Mining, Race, and Environment
    A HISTORY OF WARREN, IDAHO: MINING, RACE, AND ENVIRONMENT by Cletus R. Edmunson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Boise State University August 2012 © 2012 Cletus R. Edmunson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Cletus R. Edmunson Thesis Title: A History of Warren, Idaho: Mining, Race, and Environment Date of Final Oral Examination: 15 June 2012 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Cletus R. Edmunson, and they evaluated his presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. Todd Shallat, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Jill Gill, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Lisa Brady, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by Todd Shallat, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved for the Graduate College by John R. Pelton, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College. DEDICATION This thesis is the culmination of my own journey back into Warren’s past and is dedicated to the man who started me on this journey, my dad, John H. Edmunson. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support of many people. The author wishes to express his deepest gratitude to all of the members of the History Department at Boise State University. The author acknowledges the inherent difficulties in helping someone attain their degree when they choose a rather circuitous route.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Delegation
    CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Boise Depot Tower Photo courtesy of: Boise Convention & Visitors Bureau CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 39 Congressional Districts 40 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Qualifi cations Method of Offi cer Selection Qualifi cation Term of Offi ce United Elected by greatest 30 years of age, US Six years States number of votes in citizen for at least 9 Senator general election years and an Idaho resident United Elected by greatest 25 years of age, US Two years States number of votes in citizen for at least 7 Congressman general election years and an Idaho resident Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress will consist of two separate houses. A lawmaking body with two houses is called a bicameral legislature. The two houses that make up the U.S. Congress are the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress is the primary lawmaking body in the U.S. government. To solve problems, Members of Congress introduce legislative proposals called bills or resolutions. After considering these proposals, Members vote to adopt or to reject them. Members of Congress also review the work of executive agencies to determine if they are following government policy, and may introduce new legislation based on what they discover. Bills accepted by both houses of Congress and by the President become law. When the President vetoes a bill and returns it to Congress, Congress reviews the reasons for the rejection but may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override the President’s veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both the House and the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Avalanche / 05/21/03
    WEDNESDAY, MAY 21, 2003 Established 1865 Memorial Day Monday, May 26 VOLUME 19, NUMBER 21 HOMEDALE, OWYHEE COUNTY, IDAHO SEVENTY-FIVE CENTS High school Strike campground closed rodeo action Sports through holiday weekend page 12 pages 9-10-11 page 3 School district mulls Accident decreases due to claims life of mother and economic woes daughter Homedale School District 2003-2004 budget is being pro- discussed the possibilities of posed. An accident near Bruneau making cutbacks in several ar- The district carries a fund claimed the life of a 33-year- eas to help with state economic balance from year to year, old mother and her eight-year- cuts during a school board which Lisonbee now says is old daughter last Friday after- meeting last week, which could dropping quickly. noon. include cuts to supplies, ac- “We will be going into the Julie Ann Prior and daugh- tivities, building care and next budget with about $612 ter Marrisa Thomas, Boise, wages. thousand dollars,” Lisonbee were pronounced dead at the School District Superinten- explained. “By the end of the scene, according to a spokes- dent Bob Lisonbee said Tues- next year we could be down to person for the Idaho State Po- day after Monday’s meeting around $200 thousand dollars.” lice, who investigated the ac- that several things will be taken Lisonbee said a huge chunk cident. into consideration over the next of money has been taken from A 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada few months by the board as the the district with the state bud- was heading south on the get cutbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Study Report Outline
    HISTORIC SURVEY REPORT A Reconnaissance Survey of the Old Hailey Town Site Prepared for: The City of Hailey and the Hailey Historic Preservation Commission 115 South Main Street Hailey, Idaho 83333 Prepared by: Claudia Taylor Walsworth, M.A. Walsworth and Associates Cultural Resource Consultants P.O. Box 1248 Ketchum, Idaho 83340 June 15, 2006 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION .........................................................................................................................................1 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................................................1 4.0 PROJECT SETTING..............................................................................................................................................4 5.0 GENERAL CULTURAL SETTING.....................................................................................................................6 6.0 RESEARCH DESIGN ...........................................................................................................................................9 6.1 PRE-FIELD RESEARCH.......................................................................................................................................10 6.2 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS STUDIES ....................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • ILHS Newsletter 4
    APRIL 2010 VOLUME II, ISSUE 2 PoorPoor house,house, poorpoor farmfarm Idaho’sIdaho’s poorhousepoorhouse LawsLaws the U.S. as the county poorhouse system was well established in first session of the Idaho Territorial Uç à{x Ätàx DLà{ vxÇàâÜç y of caring for the poor to its county a means of caring for society’s indigents. The very nt, cost effective ways to provide relief to Legislature in 1863 assigned the legal responsibilit of the bad habits that were thought to have commissioners. Poorhouses were planned to be efficie special authority for poor farms, the first the poor, as well as an opportunity to reform them led them to poverty. Four Idaho counties were givensed an act requiring Ada County to purchase a of which was Shoshone County. e of the poor in Ada County: In 1883, the Idaho Territorial Legislature pas he Poor-farm poor farm of 80 to 160 acres to provide for the car se. The said farm when so purchased shall be known as t of Ada County and the house thereon as the Poor-hou The 160-acre Ada County Poor Farm was established in a rural area in what is now northwest Boise, north of State Street. Poor farm occupants originally worked there to repay Calendar their debt to society. ILHS History Display As time passed poorhouses became May 24, 2010 primarily nursing homes Open House: Chambers of Idaho County’s poor farm. for impoverished elderly Judge Randy N. Smith, S people. OVER THE HILL TO THE POOR-HOU E Over the hill to the poor-house I'm trudgin' my weary way--- Pocatello, Idaho For example, the I, a woman of seventy, and only a trifle gray--- Twin Falls County poor July 15, 2010 I, who am smart an' chipper, for all the years I've told, farm, that operated from As many another woman that's only half as old.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaine County Comprehensive Plan - Introduction
    Blaine County Comprehensive Plan - Introduction Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Blaine County Timeline .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Appendix - Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Eagle Creek Canyon in Fall - Carol Waller Introduction Vision We are a world-class rural resort county that protects our pristine natural features as one of our highest priorities. We treasure our open undeveloped hillsides, agricultural lands, clean air and water, wildlife, and unparalleled recreational opportunities. We are proud of our success in directing new growth into our cities, keeping the County rural in nature. We will continue to build on our high quality of life for our permanent and visiting population by providing efficient and effective public services, and maintaining state-of-the- art standards for new growth. We will succeed in retaining and growing our diversified economy, which includes partnerships with the cities for job and housing opportunities. We have a strategic eye on the future, and are nimble in responding to a changing world
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Delegation
    CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Blacks Creek Road overlooking the south fork of the Boise River. Photo courtesy of: Rachel “Annie” Cuellar CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 37 Congressional Districts 38 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Qualifications Method of Officer Selection Qualification Term of Office United Elected by greatest 30 years of age, US Six years States number of votes in citizen for at least 9 Senator general election years and an Idaho resident United Elected by greatest 25 years of age, US Two years States number of votes in citizen for at least 7 Congressman general election years and an Idaho resident Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress will consist of two separate houses. A lawmaking body with two houses is called a bicameral legislature. The two houses that make up the U.S. Congress are the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress is the primary lawmaking body in the U.S. government. To solve problems, Members of Congress introduce legislative proposals called bills or resolutions. After considering these proposals, Members vote to adopt or to reject them. Members of Congress also review the work of executive agencies to determine if they are following government policy, and may introduce new legislation based on what they discover. Bills accepted by both houses of Congress and by the President become law. When the President vetoes a bill and returns it to Congress, Congress reviews the reasons for the rejection but may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override the President’s veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both the House and the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lemhi Shoshones and the Salmon River Country up to the Present by Focusing on the Contempo- Rary Lemhi Campaign for Land Restoration and Recognition
    Sacajawea’s People [First Page] [-1], (1) Lines: 0 to 22 ——— * 468.596pt PgVar ——— Normal Page * PgEnds: PageBreak [-1], (1) KimE — University of Nebraska Press / Pagei/February.25.2004 / Sacajawea’s People / Mann [-2], (2) Lines: 22 to 24 ——— 0.0pt PgVar ——— Normal Page PgEnds: TEX [-2], (2) KimE — University of Nebraska Press / Page ii / February . 25 . 2004 / Sacajawea’s People / Mann Sacajaweas’ People The Lemhi Shoshones [-3], (3) and the Lines: 24 to 107 ——— Salmon River Country 3.91325pt PgVar ——— Normal Page * PgEnds: PageBreak [-3], (3) John W. W. Mann university of nebraska press lincoln and london KimE — University of Nebraska Press / Page iii / February . 25 . 2004 / Sacajawea’s People / Mann Publication of this volume was assisted by the Charles Redd Center for Western Studies. © 2004 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America ⅜ϱ Set in Minion by Kim Essman. Designed by Ray Boesche. Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mann, John W. W. Sacajawea’s people : the Lemhi Shoshones and [-4], (4) the Salmon River country / John W. W. Mann. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-8032-3241-1 (cloth : alk. paper) Lines: 107 to 193 1. Shoshoni Indians—Idaho—Salmon River Region— ——— History. 2. Shoshoni Indians—Idaho—Salmon River Region—Land tenure. 3. Shoshoni Indians—Idaho * 208.188pt PgVar —Salmon River Region—Government relations. ——— 4. Lemhi Indian Reservation (Idaho)—History. Normal Page 5. Sacagawea. 6. Lewis and Clark Expedition * PgEnds: PageBreak (1804–1806). I. Title.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONG WAIT for STATEHOOD Why It Took Washington 36 Years and Idaho 26 Years to Achieve Their Goals by Merle Wells Columbia Magazine, Fall 1988: Vol
    WashingtonHistory.org THE LONG WAIT FOR STATEHOOD Why it Took Washington 36 Years and Idaho 26 years to Achieve Their Goals By Merle Wells Columbia Magazine, Fall 1988: Vol. 2, No. 3 Washington waited 36 years For statehood aFter it was created as a territory and Idaho waited 26 years. Why did it take so long? Next year are their centennials, coming along belatedly. They could have occurred much sooner had it not been For an unusual set oF circumstances involving political considerations on the national scene and prolonged wrangling among those who lived in Eastern Washington and what became Idaho over boundaries and the location of capitals. The settlers in northern Oregon who petitioned Congress in 1851 and again in 1852 For a separate territory asked only For that part oF northern Oregon lying west oF the Cascades—now known as Western Washington. But when Congress acted and created the territory, it was not the Cascades but the Rockies that became the eastern boundary. And when Oregon achieved statehood in 1859, Washington's southern border, instead oF being a line extending eastward from the Columbia River along the 46th parallel, was established 280 miles to the south, on a line parallel with California's northern border. Thus Washington at one time included the Bitterroot Valley, as well as territory that later became part of Glacier Park in Montana, the area of South Pass, much of what became Wyoming, and all oF present southern Idaho. This region oF the West was largely uninhabited and parts oF it were even unexplored.
    [Show full text]