DOCSLIB.ORG

OCTOBER TERM 1995 Reference Index Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OCTOBER TERM 1995 Reference Index Contents jnl95$ind1Ð07-19-97 10:30:55 JNLINDPGT MILES OCTOBER TERM 1995 Reference Index Contents: Page Statistics ....................................................................................... II General .......................................................................................... III Appeals ......................................................................................... III Arguments ................................................................................... III Attorneys ...................................................................................... III Briefs ............................................................................................. IV Certiorari ..................................................................................... IV Costs .............................................................................................. IV Judgments and Opinions ........................................................... IV Original Cases ............................................................................. V Parties ........................................................................................... V Records ......................................................................................... V Rehearings ................................................................................... V Rules ............................................................................................. VI Stays .............................................................................................. VI Conclusion .................................................................................... VI (I) jnl95$IND2Ð10-20-97 09:00:02 JNLINDPGT MILES II STATISTICS AS OF JULY 1, 1996 In Forma Paid Original Pauperis Total Cases Cases Number of cases on docket..................... 11 2456 5098 7565 Cases disposed of...................................... 5 2081 4511 6597 Remaining on docket ............. 6 375 587 968 Cases docketed during term: Paid cases............................................................................................ 2095 In forma pauperis cases.................................................................. 4500 Original cases ..................................................................................... 2 Total ..................................................................................................... 6597 Cases remaining from last term ............................................................... 968 Total cases on the docket........................................................................... 7565 Cases disposed of......................................................................................... 6597 Number remaining on docket.................................................................... 968 Petitions for certiorari granted: In paid cases ....................................................................................... 85 * In forma pauperis cases.................................................................. 13 Appeals granted: In paid cases............................................................................. 7 Total cases granted plenary review......................................................... 105 Cases argued during term......................................................................... 90 Number disposed of by full opinions ............................................. 87 Number disposed of by per curiam opinions .............................. 3 Number set for reargument next term......................................... 0 Cases available for argument at beginning of term............................. 38 Disposed of summarily after review was granted ................................ 3 Original cases set for argument ............................................................... 1 Cases reviewed and decided without oral argument ........................... 120 ** Total cases available for argument at start of next term................... 52 Number of written opinions of the Court............................................... 75 Per Curiam opinions in argued cases..................................................... 2 Number of lawyers admitted to practice as of July 1, 1996: On written motion ............................................................................. 1720 On oral motion.................................................................................... 397 Total ................................................................................................ 2117 * Includes those granted after the Court recessed on June 29, 1995, and on September 27, 1995 ** Does not include 94±1412 jnl95$IND4Ð01-26-98 12:28:08 JNLINDPGT MILES III GENERAL: Page 1994 Term closed and 1995 Term convened October 2, 1995, announced by Stevens, J. Chief Justice recovering from back surgery; adjourned October 6,1996 ................ 1 Blizzard closes Washington, Court open for business week of January 8, 1996; Stevens, J., absent for oral arguments due to weather................................................. 389 Burger, C.J. (Retired). Resolutions of Bar presented ........ 769 Conference held on Thursday afternoon due to blizzard forecast for Friday, January 12, 1996; grant orders released................................................................................... 441 Duff, James C. Named Administrative Assistant to Chief Justice effective August 19, 1996. Ginsburg, J. Of®ciates at sons's wedding in Chicago, No± vember 17, 1995. Rishikof, Harvey. Announcement of resignation as Ad- ministrative Assistant to Chief Justice ............................ 976 Souter, J. Reads ®rst dissenting opinion (94±12)................. 657 APPEALS: Appeals dismissed as moot (95±1681, 95±1682, 95±1710) 943 Jurisdiction postponed; appeal dismissed under Rule 46 on March 1, 1996 (95±299) ................................................... 355 ARGUMENTS: Expedited case, limited to questions framed by Court; heard at special sitting of Court; opinion announced (95±8836).................................................................... 787, 887, 970 One hour and 20 minutes allowed for oral argument (94±805, 94±806, 94±988; 94±923, 94±924; 95±345, 95±346) ....................................................................... 163, 243, 635 Oral argument rescheduled since counsel was snowbound in Dallas; reset for argument on February 20, 1996 (94±1664, 94±8842) ........................................................... 436, 437 Ten additional minutes allowed for oral argument (94± 1893, 94±1900) ........................................................................ 322 ATTORNEYS: Attorney invited to brief and argue case in support of judgment below (95±5257)................................................... 331 Attorney ordered to pay respondents $500 and suspended from practice of law in this Court (94±1283, D±1590) .. 4 jnl95$IND4Ð01-26-98 12:28:08 JNLINDPGT MILES IV ATTORNEYSÐContinued Page Motion for appointment of counsel granted (94±9088; 95± 157; 95±345; 95±6510; 95±1598; 95±1726) ............ 243, 330, 503, 605, 945, 987 Rule to Show Cause discharged, respondent died (D±1649) 604 BRIEFS: Parties directed to ®le supplmental briefs on issue posed by Court (95±1521) ............................................................... 1037 Parties directed to ®le supplmental briefs on issue posed by Court; leave granted to ®le briefs in excess of page limitations; case summarily remanded in light of new statute (95±939)................................................. 1015, 1019, 1023 Solicitor General allowed to dispense temporarily with printing briefs since Department of Justice's appropri- ations and contract authority had not been renewed (94±1614, et al.)...................................................................... 385 CERTIORARI: Leave granted to amend petition (95±6759)......................... 603 Opinion respecting the denial of certiorari (95±5996; 95± 856; 95±1773)............................................................ 272, 762, 975 Petition dismissed, it appearing petitioner died (S±2, 95±5066) .................................................................................. 119 Petition dismissed as moot (95±31) ........................................ 182 Petition granted, case remanded for further consideration in light of state court case (95±447)................................. 291 Petition granted, judgment reversed in part and case re- manded with instructions to enter injunction. Opinion per curiam (95±1025) ........................................................... 603 Writ dismissed as improvidently granted in part. Parties directed to address remaining Due Process issues (95±386)................................................................................... 601 COSTS: Motion to retax costs granted (94±2032)............................... 330 JUDGMENTS AND OPINIONS: Granted case summarily disposed of in light of new stat- ute (95±939)............................................................................ 1023 Initial judgment af®rmed, ®nal judgment reversed (94± 1941, 94±2017)....................................................................... 965 jnl95$IND4Ð01-26-98 12:28:08 JNLINDPGT MILES V JUDGMENTS AND OPINIONSÐContinued Page Judgment af®rmed by equally divided Court. Opinion per curiam (94±2003)................................................................. 461 Opinion by Chief Justice announced by O'Connor, J.;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Event Winners
    Meet History -- NCAA Division I Outdoor Championships Event Winners as of 6/17/2017 4:40:39 PM Men's 100m/100yd Dash 100 Meters 100 Meters 1992 Olapade ADENIKEN SR 22y 292d 10.09 (2.0) +0.09 2017 Christian COLEMAN JR 21y 95.7653 10.04 (-2.1) +0.08 UTEP {3} Austin, Texas Tennessee {6} Eugene, Ore. 1991 Frank FREDERICKS SR 23y 243d 10.03w (5.3) +0.00 2016 Jarrion LAWSON SR 22y 36.7652 10.22 (-2.3) +0.01 BYU Eugene, Ore. Arkansas Eugene, Ore. 1990 Leroy BURRELL SR 23y 102d 9.94w (2.2) +0.25 2015 Andre DE GRASSE JR 20y 215d 9.75w (2.7) +0.13 Houston {4} Durham, N.C. Southern California {8} Eugene, Ore. 1989 Raymond STEWART** SR 24y 78d 9.97w (2.4) +0.12 2014 Trayvon BROMELL FR 18y 339d 9.97 (1.8) +0.05 TCU {2} Provo, Utah Baylor WJR, AJR Eugene, Ore. 1988 Joe DELOACH JR 20y 366d 10.03 (0.4) +0.07 2013 Charles SILMON SR 21y 339d 9.89w (3.2) +0.02 Houston {3} Eugene, Ore. TCU {3} Eugene, Ore. 1987 Raymond STEWART SO 22y 80d 10.14 (0.8) +0.07 2012 Andrew RILEY SR 23y 276d 10.28 (-2.3) +0.00 TCU Baton Rouge, La. Illinois {5} Des Moines, Iowa 1986 Lee MCRAE SO 20y 136d 10.11 (1.4) +0.03 2011 Ngoni MAKUSHA SR 24y 92d 9.89 (1.3) +0.08 Pittsburgh Indianapolis, Ind. Florida State {3} Des Moines, Iowa 1985 Terry SCOTT JR 20y 344d 10.02w (2.9) +0.02 2010 Jeff DEMPS SO 20y 155d 9.96w (2.5) +0.13 Tennessee {3} Austin, Texas Florida {2} Eugene, Ore.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Summer 2017 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Summer 2017 (As of July 1, 2017) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,817 Race of Defendant: White 1,196 (42.46%) Black 1,168 (41.46%) Latino/Latina 373 (13.24%) Native American 26 (0.92%) Asian 53 (1.88%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,764 (98.12%) Female 53 (1.88%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 33 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 20 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Spring 2017 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2016 or 2017 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS First Amendment Packingham v. North Carolina, No. 15-1194 (Use of websites by sex offender) (decision below 777 S.E.2d 738 (N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Super Family
    Super Family (Chaim Freedman, Petah Tikvah, Israel, September 2008) Yehoash (Heibish/Gevush) Super, born c.1760, died before 1831 in Latvia. He married unknown. I. Shmuel Super, born 1781,1 died by 1855 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia,2 occupation alcohol trader. Appears in a list from 1837 of tax litigants who were alcohol traders in Lutzin. (1) He married Brokha ?, born 1781 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia,3 died before 1831 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia.3 (2) He married Elka ?, born 1794.4 A. Payka Super, (daughter of Shmuel Super and Brokha ?) born 1796/1798 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia,3 died 1859 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia.5 She married Yaakov-Keifman (Kivka) Super, born 1798,6,3 (son of Sholom "Super" ?) died 1874 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia.7 Yaakov-Keifman: Oral tradition related by his descendants claims that Koppel's surname was actually Weinstock and that he married into the Super family. The name change was claimed to have taken place to evade military service. But this story seems to be invalid as all census records for him and his sons use the name Super. 1. Moshe Super, born 1828 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia.8 He married Sara Goda ?, born 1828.8 a. Bentsion Super, born 1851 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia.9 He married Khana ?, born 1851.9 b. Payka Super, born 1854 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia.10 c. Rassa Super, born 1857 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia.11 d. Riva Super, born 1860 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia.12 e. Mushke Super, born 1865 in Lutzin (now Ludza), Latvia.13 f.
    [Show full text]
  • 1835. EXECUTIVE. *L POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT
    1835. EXECUTIVE. *l POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT. Persons employed in the General Post Office, with the annual compensation of each. Where Compen­ Names. Offices. Born. sation. Dol. cts. Amos Kendall..., Postmaster General.... Mass. 6000 00 Charles K. Gardner Ass't P. M. Gen. 1st Div. N. Jersey250 0 00 SelahR. Hobbie.. Ass't P. M. Gen. 2d Div. N. York. 2500 00 P. S. Loughborough Chief Clerk Kentucky 1700 00 Robert Johnson. ., Accountant, 3d Division Penn 1400 00 CLERKS. Thomas B. Dyer... Principal Book Keeper Maryland 1400 00 Joseph W. Hand... Solicitor Conn 1400 00 John Suter Principal Pay Clerk. Maryland 1400 00 John McLeod Register's Office Scotland. 1200 00 William G. Eliot.. .Chie f Examiner Mass 1200 00 Michael T. Simpson Sup't Dead Letter OfficePen n 1200 00 David Saunders Chief Register Virginia.. 1200 00 Arthur Nelson Principal Clerk, N. Div.Marylan d 1200 00 Richard Dement Second Book Keeper.. do.. 1200 00 Josiah F.Caldwell.. Register's Office N. Jersey 1200 00 George L. Douglass Principal Clerk, S. Div.Kentucky -1200 00 Nicholas Tastet Bank Accountant Spain. 1200 00 Thomas Arbuckle.. Register's Office Ireland 1100 00 Samuel Fitzhugh.., do Maryland 1000 00 Wm. C,Lipscomb. do : for) Virginia. 1000 00 Thos. B. Addison. f Record Clerk con-> Maryland 1000 00 < routes and v....) Matthias Ross f. tracts, N. Div, N. Jersey1000 00 David Koones Dead Letter Office Maryland 1000 00 Presley Simpson... Examiner's Office Virginia- 1000 00 Grafton D. Hanson. Solicitor's Office.. Maryland 1000 00 Walter D. Addison. Recorder, Div. of Acc'ts do..
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
    Case: 12-1903 Document: 25 Filed: 11/20/2012 Pages: 2 NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted November 19, 2012* Decided November 20, 2012 Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge No. 12‐1903 LAURA A. JENNINGS, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellant, Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. v. No. 1:11‐cv‐1457‐SEB‐DML LEON E. PANETTA, Defendant‐Appellee. Sarah Evans Barker, Judge. O R D E R Laura Jennings, a former employee of the U.S. Department of Defense, appeals the grant of summary judgment against her in this Title VII suit on grounds that she failed to exhaust administrative remedies. We affirm. *After examining the briefs and record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus the appeal is submitted on the briefs and record. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). Case: 12-1903 Document: 25 Filed: 11/20/2012 Pages: 2 No. 12‐1903 Page 2 Jennings was a contract representative with DOD’s Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Indianapolis until being fired during her probationary period in late 2010. She brought an Equal Employment Opportunity administrative claim, alleging retaliation in connection with her discharge. The Office of Equal Opportunity Programs issued a final agency decision, finding that her claim was untimely because she hadn’t contacted the EEO counselor within 45 days of her discharge, 29 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Law Review Volume 47 2014 Number 4
    Indiana Law Review Volume 47 2014 Number 4 SURVEY BE ADVISED: SWEAT THE SMALL STUFF JUSTICE MARK S. MASSA* A couple of decades ago, one of the best-selling books of the era was a little paperback self-help volume scarcely thicker than a Sunday Missal. Entitled Don’t Sweat the Small Stuff . and It’s All Small Stuff,1 it was readily found on coffee tables and powder room vanities, providing transient readers with easily digestible bite-sized morsels of advice on how to keep little things from driving them crazy, one two-page chapter at a time. It was good guidance for life, but perhaps not for practicing lawyers. Indeed, recent decisions by Indiana appellate courts seem to send the opposite message: “Better Sweat the Small Stuff . Because It Can Turn Out to Be Big Stuff.” As I have been given the honor of introducing this year’s Survey Issue of the Indiana Law Review—a collection of legal scholarship by practitioners offering practical advice—this is the most obvious and practical observation that I can offer after two years on the appellate bench. Coming from a practice background that was mostly criminal, it has been sobering to see how often access to civil justice is denied, or at least delayed, by a failure to sweat the small stuff. Imagine a person injured in a slip and fall denied her day in court because the postage on the envelope containing her lawsuit was seventeen cents short when it arrived at the clerk’s office.2 Or an injured motorist’s case bounced because the check with the filing fee was two dollars light.3 How about a medical malpractice * Justice Mark S.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Results Briefing Global Release, April 2018
    Financial Results Briefing for Fiscal Year Ended March 2018 Thank you for making time to attend Nintendo’s financial briefing. I am Tatsumi Kimishima, President of Nintendo. Nintendo Co., Ltd. Mr. Furukawa, General Manager of the Corporate Financial Results Briefing Planning Department, has just presented our financial President and Representative Director results for this period. Tatsumi Kimishima I will now discuss our planned initiatives for the fiscal year ending March 2019. Firstly, Nintendo Labo has had the high expectation as a “very Nintendo” product since the original announcement in January this year, and as soon as it was launched, consumers have been posting photos and video of parents and children as they work together to assemble Global Release, April 2018 the cardboard pieces and then play with their completed Toy-Con, which were unimaginable in video games before. It has been on sale for only a week in Japan and the US, while sales in Europe will begin today, but the main purchasers of Nintendo Labo at launch are not the same as with typical video games, and they are mainly elementary school children and their fathers, as well as game players who like creative activities. We developed and will nurture Nintendo Labo as a product that is not constrained by the boundaries of conventional video games and can endear itself to a broader range of consumers. From the initial response, we have this solid feeling that we are off to a great start in that regard. Some Nintendo Titles Released Since the Start of the Year We began releasing Nintendo titles non-stop with the launch of Nintendo Switch, and kept the new-release buzz alive through the end of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Allies Nintendo Direct
    Easy Allies Nintendo Direct Ragged Aziz mutualizes her spotlights so what that Orin campaign very incompletely. Metaphorical Hiralal tessellate her herbicides so submissively that Seamus immunized very qualmishly. Darby is spottily unblamed after an-end Jotham criminalize his hydrozoans fictitiously. Get things could continue its own back was easy allies nintendo direct should chrono trigger a nintendo vault here you could go! Nintendo announced the deadliest titan in an apparent bid to the lines of dmca strikes, filling hospitals and uses cookies may earn points and easy allies nintendo direct mini direct mini link. Is a shortage of. Tied together requires inline frames its new features to tweet and easy allies has showed. Although i entered a nintendo. Find your allies! Mini direct on your special, strike back against such partner with a closer look at any device applies to progress through the eza fantasy viii. Your allies has already easy for all about the easy allies nintendo direct mini: unsub test captaincy leadership gig will also appreciated the answer you make it had accessibility. Its sense of nintendo direct mini: this transaction was busy buying up for our hottest stories of who in peace as ebooks and easy allies nintendo direct. Thanks for being able to discuss where it makes two that stuff is the easy allies nintendo direct. Are all of this content, grass and easy allies nintendo direct mini: squeak squad might be paid ruby balances will help it was excited to stay? Since the nintendo direct full attention to the easy allies nintendo direct full attention to fulfill your.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signers of the U.S. Constitution
    CONSTITUTIONFACTS.COM The U.S Constitution & Amendments: About the Signers (Continued) The Signers of the U.S. Constitution On September 17, 1787, the Constitutional Convention came to a close in the Assembly Room of Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. There were seventy individuals chosen to attend the meetings with the initial purpose of amending the Articles of Confederation. Rhode Island opted to not send any delegates. Fifty-five men attended most of the meetings, there were never more than forty-six present at any one time, and ultimately only thirty-nine delegates actually signed the Constitution. (William Jackson, who was the secretary of the convention, but not a delegate, also signed the Constitution. John Delaware was absent but had another delegate sign for him.) While offering incredible contributions, George Mason of Virginia, Edmund Randolph of Virginia, and Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts refused to sign the final document because of basic philosophical differences. Mainly, they were fearful of an all-powerful government and wanted a bill of rights added to protect the rights of the people. The following is a list of those individuals who signed the Constitution along with a brief bit of information concerning what happened to each person after 1787. Many of those who signed the Constitution went on to serve more years in public service under the new form of government. The states are listed in alphabetical order followed by each state’s signers. Connecticut William S. Johnson (1727-1819)—He became the president of Columbia College (formerly known as King’s College), and was then appointed as a United States Senator in 1789.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report of the House of Bishops' Working Party on Women in the Episcopate Church Ho
    Women Bishops in the Church of England? A report of the House of Bishops’ Working Party on Women in the Episcopate Church House Publishing Church House Great Smith Street London SW1P 3NZ Tel: 020 7898 1451 Fax: 020 7989 1449 ISBN 0 7151 4037 X GS 1557 Printed in England by The Cromwell Press Ltd, Trowbridge, Wiltshire Published 2004 for the House of Bishops of the General Synod of the Church of England by Church House Publishing. Copyright © The Archbishops’ Council 2004 Index copyright © Meg Davies 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or stored or transmitted by any means or in any form, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system without written permission, which should be sought from the Copyright Administrator, The Archbishops’ Council, Church of England, Church House, Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3NZ. Email: [email protected]. The Scripture quotations contained herein are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright © 1989, by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA, and are used by permission. All rights reserved. Contents Membership of the Working Party vii Prefaceix Foreword by the Chair of the Working Party xi 1. Introduction 1 2. Episcopacy in the Church of England 8 3. How should we approach the issue of whether women 66 should be ordained as bishops? 4. The development of women’s ministry 114 in the Church of England 5. Can it be right in principle for women to be consecrated as 136 bishops in the Church of England? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record-Senate. 1497
    1909~ CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. 1497 By 1\Ir. LOVERING:· Petition of T. S. Howes and others, of insecticides and fungicides in interstate commerce (H. R. Dennis Grange, No. 260, favoring a national Wghways commis- 21318)-to the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. sion-to the Committee on Agriculture. · Also, petition of board of directors of New Jersey Chapter of By l\Ir. McLAUGHLIN of Michigan: Papers to accompany American Institute of Architects, favoring integrity of the plan bills for relief of Martin J. Cole and Eli D. Johnson-to the for improvement of Washington by placing the Lincoln me­ Committee on Invalid Pensions. morial at west end of the 1\iall-to the Committee on the By l\Ir. l\IALBY: Petition of Gouverneur (N. Y.) Grange, Library. favoring creation of a national Wghways commission-to the Also, petition of Hamilton Grange, No. 79, Pah·ons of Hus­ Committee on Agriculture. • bandry, of Hamilton Square, N. J., favoring establishment of By Mr. l\IANN: Petition of employees of Isthmian Canal postal savings banks and a parcels post-to the Committee on Commission and Panama Railroad Company, against action on the Post-Office and Post-Roads. part of United States Government or Isthmian Canal Commis­ sion curtailing commissary privileges-to the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. SENATEG . Also, petition of Fort Worth (Tex.) freight bureau of Texas Hardware Jobbers' Association, favoring H. R. · 22901, 22902, THURSDAY, January 28,1909. and 22903, relative to interst..'lte-rate requirement-to the Com­ Prayer by ·the Chaplain, Rev. Edward E. Hale. mittee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.
    [Show full text]