Manitoba's Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Manitoba's Future Our Children’s Success: MANITOBA’S FUTURE Report of the Commission on K to12 Education March 2020 02 Report of the Commission on Kindergarten to Grade 12 Education LETTER TO THE MINISTER OF EDUCATION The Honourable Kelvin Goertzen Minister of Education Government of Manitoba 168 Legislative Building Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 0V8 Dear Minister Goertzen: We are pleased to submit to you the final report of the Commission on K to12 Education. We thank you for the opportunity to conduct this timely review by listening to the advice and good counsel of the widest possible cross-section of Manitobans. We thank all those who met with us, attended the public interactive workshops, provided submissions, presented briefs, and participated in discussions and online surveys. It was, indeed, a pleasant experience for us to see the passion and commitment of Manitobans who had one goal in common: to make the system even more effective, relevant, and engaging for all of Manitoba’s students. Our recommendations represent the consensus we have forged, and the conclusions reached after almost a year of hearings, research on successful practices in Canada and internationally, and careful and intense deliberations on what works to improve schools and to create a world-class education system. This report represents a comprehensive review of the province’s elementary and secondary education system – the first of its kind in decades. We sought input on key areas of focus including student learning, teaching, accountability for student learning, governance, and funding. In all, we received 62 briefs, 2,309 written submissions, 1,260 responses to the teacher survey and 8,891 to the public survey, as well as numerous phone calls, handwritten notes, and personal emails. It is clear that Manitobans are supportive of their school system. They appreciate its strengths and are also aware of the areas that require immediate attention. They want to have excellent schools wherever they choose to live in the province. We took your invitation to help shape our education system quite seriously. We are counting on you to implement our recommendations and to further enable and build the capacity of those who teach, lead, and govern to continue to do their best work. We are counting on all staff within our divisions to persist in working co-operatively to provide the avenues, tools, and pathways to success for all students, regardless of their backgrounds or personal circumstances. We encourage you to continue to engage parents, community, business, labour, and industry to create partnerships that further cement their support for our schools. Fortunately, the will to take the schools to higher levels of achievement exists across Manitoba. Respectfully, Clayton Manness Dr. Janice MacKinnon Commission Co-Chair Commission Co-Chair Report of the Commission on Kindergarten to Grade 12 Education 03 NAMES OF COMMISSIONERS, EXTERNAL CONSULTANT, AND SECRETARIAT STAFF Commissioners Terry Brown – Community Leader and CEO of Okimaw Community and HR Solutions Mark Frison – President of Assiniboine Community College J.D. Lees – Career Teacher Clayton Manness (Co-Chair) – President, Prairie Flour Mills and active farmer Dr. Janice MacKinnon (Co-Chair) – Professor of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan and Executive Fellow, University of Calgary Linda Markus – Kelsey School Division & University College of the North (June 2019 to February 2020) Jill Quilty – Criminal, divorce, and family lawyer (January to May 2019) Laurel Repski – Vice-President, Human Resources (retired) Denis Robert – Retired Principal and Career Teacher Ian Wishart – Legislative Assistant to the Minister of Education Consultant to the Commission Dr. Avis Glaze – International Education Adviser Secretariat Staff Dr. Jean-Vianney Auclair – Director Rhonda Shaw – Senior Policy Analyst Kim Topham – Administrative Assistant Paige Jaenen – Assistant to the Commission 04 Report of the Commission on Kindergarten to Grade 12 Education TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter to the Minister of Education ................................................................................................................3 Names of Commissioners, External Consultant, and Secretariat Staff ..................................................4 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................................7 Acknowledgments .........................................................................................................................................23 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................26 The Mandate of the Commission .................................................................................................................28 Organization of the Report ...........................................................................................................................28 Manitoba: A Vision for Improvement ...........................................................................................................29 How are Manitoba’s K to 12 Students Doing Academically? ...................................................................30 Education Spending and Student Outcomes .............................................................................................33 Manitoba Commission on Kindergarten to Grade 12 Education: The Focus Areas for the Review ..34 Public Consultation Process ........................................................................................................................35 Imperatives for Improvement .......................................................................................................................37 IMPERATIVE #1: Strengthen Educator Capacity to Improve Teaching and Learning ......................38 IMPERATIVE #2: Increase School Leadership Effectiveness ...............................................................49 IMPERATIVE #3: Improve Student Engagement and Well-being .........................................................55 IMPERATIVE #4: Close the Achievement Gap Between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Students .69 IMPERATIVE #5: Commit to Equitable Outcomes and Improved Achievement for All .....................78 IMPERATIVE #6: Ensure Quality Educational Programming in Rural, Remote, and Northern Communities ..............................................................................................................................................89 IMPERATIVE #7: Strengthen the Delivery of French Language Education ........................................93 IMPERATIVE #8: Expand Community Education and Strengthen Public Outreach and Alliances 97 IMPERATIVE #9: Improve Foundational Skills in Mathematics, Literacy, and Other Curricular Areas ..........................................................................................................................................................105 IMPERATIVE #10: Enhance the Effectiveness of Governance, Administrative, and Funding Structures .................................................................................................................................................. 119 Concluding Remarks: Our Path Forward ..................................................................................................129 Constructing Our Path Forward .............................................................................................................132 References ....................................................................................................................................................135 Additional Readings .....................................................................................................................................149 List of Recommendations ...........................................................................................................................154 Appendices ...................................................................................................................................................164 Appendix 1: Terms of Reference .............................................................................................................164 Appendix 2: Participants in the Consultations: Individuals and Organizations ..............................166 Appendix 3: Web Links to Consultation Summary Documents .........................................................176 Report of the Commission on Kindergarten to Grade 12 Education 05 06 Report of the Commission on Kindergarten to Grade 12 Education EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In January 2019, the Government of Manitoba reiterated its commitment to improve student outcomes by creating an education system that has high standards for educators, high expectations for student learning, relevant curriculum, excellence in governance, a sustainable fiscal framework, and enhanced public confidence in the education system. With the idea that Manitoba would become the most improved system in Canada, the government appointed a diverse team of commissioners to propose a renewed vision for K to 12 education, make bold recommendations to ignite change, and consider the continuum of early learning, post-secondary education, and labour market needs as part of an integrated lifelong learning system. There is a clarion call across the world to reform education systems. Many elected
Recommended publications
  • Community Colleges, Smes, and Innovation in Manitoba
    Collaborating for Innovation: Community colleges, SMEs, and innovation in Manitoba by Thomas Keith Edmunds A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in Rural Studies Guelph, Ontario, Canada © T. Keith Edmunds, 2015 ABSTRACT COLLABORATING FOR INNOVATION: COMMUNITY COLLEGES, SMES, AND INNOVATION IN MANITOBA Thomas Keith Edmunds Advisor: University of Guelph, 2015 Dr. Al Lauzon The importance of SMEs to the Canadian economy coupled with the significant role of innovation in ensuring the long-term viability of these businesses highlights the value of removing any barriers to innovation that may be experienced. Community colleges may provide a largely untapped resource for SMEs seeking to innovate. Focussing on Manitoba’s college system, this research was conducted utilizing interviews with key informants from three community colleges and surveys distributed widely throughout the province’s business community. A number of impressions were formed from this largely exploratory research project, including: (1) the conceptual model on which this research was largely based may not be ideally suited for all community college situations; (2) colleges and SMEs appear to have different operational definitions of “innovation”; (3) SMEs are largely unaware of the capacities of colleges to provide services regarding innovation; and (4) colleges have often developed bureaucratic roadblocks to the provision of services to SMEs. iii Acknowledgements This project could not have been completed without the support of many people. I gratefully acknowledge the following individuals: My advisor, Al Lauzon, who tolerated both long delays in activity and frantic barrages of emails asking for advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Manitoba's Post-Secondary System
    POST-SECONDAY PATHWAYS IN MANITOBA Pathways to Education and Work Centre for the Study of Canadian and International Higher Education Qualifications: The Link Between Educational and Occupational Pathways and Labour Market Outcomes is a project funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The four-year project investigates the nature of pathways within postsecondary education, and between postsecondary education and the labour market. As part of this project, the Provincial Pathways profile series lays the groundwork for further inquiry contrasting and comparing educational and occupational pathways in Canadian provinces and territories. Manitoba: Overview The degree of coordination of postsecondary education in Manitoba has fluctuated over the course of its history. An initial system of a single university governing a constellation of denominational colleges (Gregson, 1996) has evolved into a system of autonomous institutions, linked through an array of coordinating endeavors. The province’s present post-secondary system supports both English and French language learners. Manitoba’s large and expanding Indigenous populations are an impetus for innovation as traditionally structured institutions partner with Indigenous communities and educators to develop programs and institutional structures that provide “culturally sensitive” and place based education in the province’s North. (University College of the North, 2005). Manitoba’s Post-Secondary System Manitoba’s post-secondary education system is governed by the Advanced Learning Division of the province’s Education and Training Department. The system is comprised of Four universities Four public colleges and institutes Private, degree-granting religious institutes Private vocational training schools The system began with one university and an affiliated college system (Gregor, 1997).1 The Universities Establishment Act (1967) converted two of these colleges into universities in their own right: Brandon University (Brandon College) and the University of Winnipeg (United College).
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Racism-Free Schools Through Critical/Courageous Conversations on Race
    Creating Racism-Free Schools through Critical/Courageous Conversations on Race Manitoba Education and Training Indigenous Inclusion Directorate 2017 Creating Racism-Free Schools through Critical/Courageous Conversations on Race Manitoba Education and Training Cataloguing in Publication Data Creating racism-free schools through critical/courageous conversations on race Includes bibliographical references. ISBN: 978-0-7711-7520-6 (pdf) 1. Racism—Prevention—Study and teaching—Manitoba. 2. Race discrimination—Prevention—Study and teaching—Manitoba. 3. Indigenous peoples—Study and teaching—Manitoba. 4. Aboriginal peoples—Study and teaching—Manitoba. I. Manitoba. Manitoba Education and Training. 371.8299707127 Copyright © 2017, the Government of Manitoba, represented by the Minister of Education and Training. Manitoba Education and Training Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Every effort has been made to acknowledge original sources and to comply with copyright law. If cases are identified where this has not been done, please notify Manitoba Education and Training. Errors or omissions will be corrected in a future edition. Sincere thanks to the authors, artists, and publishers who allowed their original material to be used. All images found in this resource are copyright protected and should not be extracted, accessed, or reproduced for any purpose other than for their intended educational use in this resource. Website references in this document are provided solely as a convenience and do not constitute an endorsement by Manitoba Education and Training of their content, policies, or products. The department does not control the referenced websites or the subsequent links, and is not responsible for their content, accuracy, or legality. Any websites referenced in this resource are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • 515 PORTAGE AVENUE – WESLEY COLLEGE (WESLEY HALL, UNIVERSITY of WINNIPEG) George Browne and S.F
    515 PORTAGE AVENUE – WESLEY COLLEGE (WESLEY HALL, UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG) George Browne and S.F. Peters, 1894-95 The development of advanced education in Manitoba was spearheaded by church institutions. Earliest among them were St. Boniface College (Roman Catholic, 1818), St. John’s College (Anglican, 1866), and Manitoba College (Presbyterian, 1871). When the University of Manitoba was established in 1877, it became the provincial examining authority, but teaching remained the prerogative of the affiliated denominational colleges. The year 1877 also saw the incorporation of two new bodies, Wesley College (Wesleyan Methodist) and Trinity College (Methodist Episcopal). The Wesleyan Methodists had previously (1873-77) operated an educational institute to fill a void in Winnipeg’s public school system. That experience did not translate, however, into the immediate implementation of Wesley © City of Winnipeg 2001 College’s charter. Instead, it took about a decade before the college was in a position to offer post-secondary courses in theology and the liberal arts. During that time, the Wesleyan and Episcopal Methodists were united into one church, the college’s charter was revised, funds were raised to hire staff, affiliation with the University of Manitoba was approved, and Reverend J.W. Sparling of Kingston, Ontario, was appointed principal. The first classes opened in the fall of 1888 in Grace Church on Notre Dame Avenue. As enrolment expanded, the college moved to rented facilities on Albert Street, then in 1890 to a converted house at Broadway and Edmonton Street. Steps also were taken to assemble the land and money needed for a permanent building. The chosen site was in West Winnipeg on the Spence Estate near Manitoba College.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES
    First Session - Thirty-Seventh Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS Official Report (Hansard) Published under the authority of The Honourable George Hickes Speaker Vol. L No.6- 1:30 p.m., Wednesday, December 1, 1999 MANITOBA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thirty-Seventh Legislature Member Constituency Political Affiliation AGLUGUB, Cris The Maples N.D.P. ALLAN, Nancy St. Vital N.D.P. ASHTON, Steve, Hon. Thompson N.D.P. ASPER, Linda Riel N.D.P. BARRETT, Becky, Hon. Inkster N.D.P. CALDWELL, Drew, Hon. Brandon East N.D.P. CERILLI, Marianne Radisson N.D.P. CHOMIAK, Dave, Hon. Kildonan N.D.P. CUMMINGS, Glen Ste. Rose P.C. DACQUAY, Louise Seine River P.C. DERKACH, Leonard Russell P.C. DEWAR, Gregory Selkirk N.D.P. DOER, Gary, Hon. Concordia N.D.P. DRIEDGER, Myrna Charleswood P.C. DYCK, Peter Pembina P.C. ENNS, Harry Lakeside P.C. FAURSCHOU, David Portage Ia Prairie P.C. FILMON, Gary Tuxedo P.C. FRIESEN,Jean, Hon. Wolseley N.D.P. GERRARD,Jon, Hon. River Heights Lib. GILLESHAMMER, Harold Minnedosa P.C. HELWER, Edward Gimli P.C. HICKES, George Point Douglas N.D.P. JENNISSEN, Gerard flin flon N.D.P. KORZENIOWSKI, Bonnie St. James N.D.P. LATHLIN, Oscar, Hon. The Pas N.D.P. LAURENDEAU, Marcel St. Norbert P.C. LEMIEUX, Ron, Hon. La Verendrye N.D.P. LOEWEN, John fort Whyte P.C. MACKINTOSH, Gord, Hon. St. Johns N.D.P. MAGUIRE, Larry Arthur-Virden P.C. MALOWAY,Jim Elmwood N.D.P. MARTINDALE, Doug Burrows N.D.P. McGIFFORD, Diane, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates Proceedings
    Second Session - Thirty-Sixth Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS (Hansard) Published under the authorityof TheHonourable Louise M. Dacquay Speaker Vol. XLVI No. 14-1:30 p.m., Wednesday, April10, 1996 ISSN 0542-5492 MANITOBA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thirty-Sixth Legislature Members, Constituencies and Political Affiliation Name Constituency eaay ASHTON, Steve Thompson N.D.P. BARRETI, Becky Wellington N.D.P. CERILLI, Marianne Radisson N.D.P. CHOMIAK, Dave Kildonan N.D.P. CUMMINGS, Glen, Hon. Ste. Rose P.C. DACQUA Y, Louise, Hon. Seine River P.C. DERKACH, Leonard, Hon. Roblin-Russell P.C. DEWAR, Gregory Selkirk N.D.P. DOER, Gary Concordia N.D.P. DOWNEY, James, Hon. Arthur-Virden P.C. DRIEDGER, Albert, Hon. Steinbach P.C. DYCK, Peter Pembina P.C. ENNS, Harry, Hon. Lakeside P.C. ERNST, Jim, Hon. Charleswood P.C. EVANS, Clif Interlake N.D.P. EVANS, Leonard S. Brandon East N.D.P. FILMON, Gary, Hon. Tuxedo P.C. FINDLAY, Glen, Hon. Springfield P.C. FRIESEN, Jean Wolseley N.D.P. GAUDRY, Neil St. Boniface Lib. GILLESHAMMER, Harold, Hon. Minnedosa P.C. HELWER, Edward Gimli P.C. HICKES, George Point Douglas N.D.P. JENNISSEN, Gerard Flin Flon N.D.P. KOWALSKI, Gary The Maples Lib. LAMOUREUX, Kevin Inkster Lib. LATHLIN, Oscar The Pas N.D.P. LAURENDEAU, Marcel St. Norbert P.C. MACKINTOSH, Gord St. Johns N.D.P. MALOWAY, Jim Elmwood N.D.P. MARTINDALE, Doug Burrows N.D.P. McALPINE, Gerry Sturgeon Creek P.C. McCRAE, James, Hon. Brandon West P.C. McGIFFORD, Diane Osborne N.D.P.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTEMBER 2018 VOLUME 97 NUMBER 1 NEWSMAGAZINE of the MANITOBA TEACHERS’ SOCIETY Living Space Touching Down This Fall
    SEPTEMBER 2018 VOLUME 97 NUMBER 1 NEWSMAGAZINE OF THE MANITOBA TEACHERS’ SOCIETY Living Space Touching down this fall Register early to receive a free technology kit! With this project students will learn to code micro:bits, analyze Digital Literacy Supporters: environmental data and compare their findings to those taken by Canadian astronaut David Saint-Jacques aboard the International Space Station! letstalkscience.ca/livingspace Visionary Donors: Mitchell A. Baran TM SEPTEMBER 2018 VOLUME 97 NUMBER 1 NEWSMAGAZINE OF THE MANITOBA TEACHERS’ SOCIETY P.4 From the President P.5 Inside MTS P.14 The Manitoba Teacher has become one of the oldest publications in Manitoba and a regular arrival for generations of teachers. P.6 Email inundation: a help or a hindrance? Richard Roberts & Doug Edmond consult on technology workflow P.10 World of Religions course New 40S-level elective available for high school students all across Manitoba P.18 Manitoba teachers in Haitian schools Educators support new training and skills to increase local capacities FROM THE PRESIDENT Editor George Stephenson, NORM GOULD [email protected] Phone: (204) 831-3058 elcome back! As we enter the new school year, we also welcome a Design new education minister. Kelvin Goertzen was recently appointed as Krista Rutledge the education minister, replacing The Honourable Ian Wishart. Photography WMinister Wishart and I have always managed to maintain a respectful and Matea Tuhtar cordial relationship over the years, despite not seeing eye to eye on many issues. He has certainly shown dedication to the students of this province and has Circulation been a pleasure to work with.
    [Show full text]
  • Providence Theological Seminary
    WHAT FACTORS HAVE AFFECTED THE DEVITOPMENT OF THE RELIGIOUS ETHOS AT THJ5 UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA AND HOW DOES TKIS DETERMINE VOLUNTARY RELIGIOUS INVOLVEMENT AMONG STUDENTS, STAFF, AND ALUMNI? by Denis LaClare A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of PROVIDENCE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY in Partial Fulfilhent of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS National Library Bibliothèque nationale 191 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services senfices bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. nie Wellington OttawaON K1A ON4 OttawaON K1AON4 Canada canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une Licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfichelfilm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique . The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................... .......................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. ANANALYSIS OF THE RELIGIOUS IMPLICATIONS OF THE FOUNDING OF THE UMVERSITY OF MANITOBA .............................. 1 1 Pre-1877: Religious Factors and the Founding of the U of M 1817: Religious Beliefs and Intentions of the U of M Founding Fathers 1877: Religious Beliefs and Practices of U of M Staff and Students 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Controversy Surrounding the Environment Amendment Act: Balancing the Risk of West Nile Virus Over Malathion Fogging
    Controversy Surrounding The Environment Amendment Act: Balancing the Risk of West Nile Virus Over Malathion Fogging LEAH ROSS My wife and I get sick when the pesticide trucks come around every year. We don’t need to hear when our area is being fogged—we can feel it in our legs, a dull ache that tells us the poison truck has come. We have tried to get our house taken off the list, and the city has duly recorded our name and address, but it has no effect. The guys on the truck just spray everything, including people’s vegetable gardens. Once my wife saw them spray our house and ran outside to tell them we were supposed to be missed. The guy on the truck noticed her, turned around… and sprayed her with the fog…. Another night we saw them playing with the neighbour’s dog, who likes chasing water hoses and figured, somewhere in his tiny dog brain, that he was playing the same game. He cheerfully chased the spray around his dog pad, his muzzle dripping with malathion. The truck had stopped so that the sprayer could play this game for a minute or two. We never bothered to complain, figuring that if they weren’t going to respect our wish to be bypassed, they weren’t going to investigate our complaint. It’s our word against theirs.1 I. INTRODUCTION innipeg is known as the mosquito capital of Canada and “in the summer of 2001,West Nile Virus was recognized as an W emerging public health threat”.2 As a result, provincial and civic officials pumped millions of dollars into fighting the bugs by helicopter and on foot.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Deaconesses the Manitoba Way!
    Training Deaconesses the Manitoba Way! Manitoba College’s Deaconess Training Program 1920 to 1939 Sherri McConnell June 1, 1998 Training Deaconesses the Manitoba Way! Manitoba College’s Deaconess Training Program 1920 to 1939 Toronto is considered the historical centre for Deaconess training within The United Church of Canada. Toronto was the site of two denominational training schools prior to Church Union; the Methodist National Training School established in 1893 and the Presbyterian Missionary and Deaconess Training Home (also known as Ewart Training Home) established in 1897.1 These two schools joined to create the United Church Training School Church after union in 1925, and the subsequent decisions of General Council of 1926 regarding the unified Deaconess Order and the future of the old training schools.2 Housed in the former Methodist School, the United Church Training College became the United Church School for Deaconess and Missionary Training.3 What is less commonly remembered is that this school was not the only school for Deaconess preparation at that time. Winnipeg, Manitoba was home to a Deaconess training school as well. This made-in-Manitoba program began in 1920 through the Presbyterian Theological School, Manitoba College. The Women’s Department continued on until 1939, the year that Wesley College and Manitoba College officially merged into United College. At this time the Women’s Department disappears from historical documentation. The purpose of this paper is to uncover the life and death of the Manitoba College Deaconess training program. My personal perspective and agenda is part of this purpose. I was a woman who moved to Toronto to attend the Centre for Christian Studies (formerly United Church Training College and then Covenant College) in 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition Report
    2008 Expedition Report CCGS Amundsen LEG 11A ArcticNet/SOLAS Canadian Arctic Archipelago and Baffin Bay LEG 11B ArcticNet/IORVL Labrador fjords ArcticNet – Amundsen Science Program Université Laval Pavillon Alexandre-Vachon, room 4081 1045, avenue de la Médecine Québec, QC, G1V 0A6 CANADA www.amundsen.ulaval.ca www.arcticnet.ulaval.ca Katrine Chalut and Anissa Merzouk ArcticNet Expedition Report Editors [email protected] Keith Levesque ArcticNet Marine Research Manager [email protected] Table of Content TABLE OF CONTENT II LIST OF FIGURES IV LIST OF TABLES VI 2008 EXPEDITION REPORT 7 PART I – OVERVIEW AND SYNOPSIS OF OPERATIONS 8 1 OVERVIEW OF THE 2008 ARCTICNET / AMUNDSEN EXPEDITION 8 1.1 Introduction 8 1.2 Regional settings 10 1.3 2008 Expedition Plan 11 2 LEG 11A – 4 SEPTEMBER TO 28 SEPTEMBER 2008 – LANCASTER SOUND AND BAFFIN BAY12 2.1 Introduction 12 2.2 Synopsis of operations 13 2.3 Chief Scientist’s comments 15 PART II – PROJECT REPORTS 16 1 ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS AND TRACE GASES (ARCTIC-SOLAS) – LEG 11 16 1.1 Introduction 16 1.2 Methodology 16 1.3 Preliminary Results 18 1.4 Comments and recommendations 20 2 SURFACE METEOROLOGY AND FLUX PROGRAM – LEG 11 21 2.1 Introduction 21 2.2 Methodology 21 3 MOORING PROGRAM – LEGS 10A AND 11 25 3.1 Introduction 25 3.2 Methodology 27 3.3 Comments and recommendations 48 4 WATER COLUMN STRUCTURE AND OCEAN CIRCULATION (CTD-ROSETTE, MVP AND ADCP OPERATIONS) – LEG 11 49 4.1 Introduction 49 4.2 Methodology 49 4.3 Preliminary results 53 4.4 Comments and recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of Votes Elmwood & the Pas By-Elections
    STATEMENT OF VOTES Elmwood & The Pas By-elections March 24, 2009 Statement of Votes Elmwood and The Pas By-elections March 24, 2009 CONTACT US: 120-200 Vaughan Street Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 1T5 Phone: 204.945.3225 Toll-free: 1.866.628.6837 Email: [email protected] www.electionsmanitoba.ca SStatementofVotes2.inddtatementofVotes2.indd 2 88/7/09/7/09 111:48:061:48:06 AMAM Table of Contents Reporting on the Elmwood and The Pas By-elections ..........................................................................5 Voter Registration ...........................................................................................................................................................................5 Nominations ......................................................................................................................................................................................6 Registered Parties ...........................................................................................................................................................................6 Voting .....................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Summary of Votes Received ...................................................................................................................................................8 Summary of Results ......................................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]