The Possible Worlds of Shakespearean Drama

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Possible Worlds of Shakespearean Drama The Possible Worlds of Shakespearean Drama Submitted by Samir Talib Dawood Al-Jasim To the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English, May 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (signature) ......................................................................................... 1 2 Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgement ...................................................................................................................... 6 Note on the Texts ................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 8 Possible Worlds in Philosophy ........................................................................................... 10 Possible Worlds in Literature.............................................................................................. 13 Possible Worlds in Shakespeare’s Plays and Early Modern England ......................... 23 This Study.............................................................................................................................. 29 Chapter One.............................................................................................................................. 40 The Possible Worlds of Performance: The Virtual in Shakespeare’s Theatre................ 40 Theories of fictionality and the virtual in Theatre............................................................. 42 The Virtual in Renaissance Dramatic Theory .................................................................. 56 The Virtual in Shakespeare’s Theatre............................................................................... 64 The Chorus in Henry V .................................................................................................... 68 The play-within-a-play inA Midsummer Night’s Dream............................................... 73 Narration in Antony and Cleopatra ................................................................................ 79 Conclusion............................................................................................................................. 93 Chapter Two.............................................................................................................................. 97 The Actual and the Virtual in the Shakespearean Text ...................................................... 97 Virtuality in Narrative Theory .............................................................................................. 99 Rhetoric: The Art of the Virtual and Probable ................................................................ 105 Virtuality and Probability in Shakespeare ....................................................................... 113 Cymbeline........................................................................................................................ 113 Richard II.......................................................................................................................... 125 Conclusion........................................................................................................................... 138 Chapter Three......................................................................................................................... 141 The Possible Worlds of Shakespeare’s Histories.............................................................. 141 Possible Worlds of History: The Ontological and the Cognitive.................................. 143 Probability, Rhetoric and History in Early Modern England......................................... 151 ‘Naked’ vs. ‘Apparelled’ truth in Shakespeare ............................................................... 162 Conclusion........................................................................................................................... 183 Chapter Four ........................................................................................................................... 187 Counterfactuality and Contingency in Shakespearean Drama ....................................... 187 Counterfactuals, Possibility and Causality...................................................................... 189 3 Counterfactuality in Shakespeare’s Drama.................................................................... 193 The Psychological Dimension ...................................................................................... 195 The Historical Dimension .............................................................................................. 201 The Philosophical Dimension ....................................................................................... 212 The Literary Dimension.................................................................................................. 224 Conclusion........................................................................................................................... 236 Conclusion............................................................................................................................... 239 4 Abstract This study addresses the role of the possible or virtual in Shakespearean drama. It argues that the possible component constitutes an integral part of Shakespearean drama, and that they are as important as the actual events or component. To underscore its paramount importance, the study stresses two aspects of the possible in Shakespearean drama: its potentiality and its cognitive function. Potentiality highlights the power of the virtual in opening up different meanings and interpretations, suggesting alternative possibilities and creating new storylines out of the original ones. The cognitive function of the virtual or possible underlines its role in rendering the actual events and happenings more intelligible, probable and comprehensible. The study builds on the theoretical framework of possible worlds theory as well as Classical and Renaissance rhetoric; it argues that Shakespeare’s familiarity with and employment of these notions can be attributed to his rhetorical training, which formed an essential part of Elizabethan education. The study deals with the drama both as a fictional story and as theatre. On the level of theatre, it demonstrates that, despite its materiality, theatre must stimulate an imaginary virtual reality if the physical events and happenings onstage are to be fully meaningful. On the level of the fictional story, it shows that virtual or possible events form the beliefs and intentions of characters. They help to set the conflict on track and help the audience to access the characters’ inwardness. Although the possible is thought of as an ontological category, the study highlights its cognitive dimension, and argues that features of the possible even shape our image of the actual past. It addresses this question in relation to the representation of history in Shakespeare’s history plays. Finally, it deals with counterfactual statements in Shakespeare and uses a multidisciplinary approach to study their significance. 5 Acknowledgement I am deeply indebted to my first supervisor Professor Philip Schwyzer, who has provided me with intellectual engagement and ample experience in his field. His interest in and support of the project have been necessary to counter my difficult feelings of doubt and weakness. He has been the first to realize the ‘potential’ of this project and to encourage me to carry on with it. I am greatly appreciative of his patience in reading and commenting on multiple drafts of this thesis. And I am particularly grateful for my second supervisor, Dr. Edward Paleit, who joined the work half the way through, but whose insightful observations and suggestions have helped shape the thesis in its final form. Great thanks should go to Professor Marie-Laure Ryan, whose formulation of the possible worlds theory inspired me to explore its application to Shakespeare. She has been very generous in giving guidance and answering my enquiries, especially in the earlier stages of the project. I am also in debt to Professor Simon Palfrey, who happily shared with me some manuscripts of his forthcoming work, Shakespeare’s Possible Worlds. I am no less appreciative for his encouraging and generous remarks about furthering work in this area. I am also grateful to Dr Georgi Niagolov, who sent me a copy of his invaluable thesis Shakespeare’s Wordplay and Possible Worlds (2013). A big thank you is due to my family in Iraq, without whose love, encouragement and sincere support I would not have been able to arrive at this stage. My father and mother have always stood by me to pursue my study. So, a big Thank You to them. Particular gratitude is due to my wife, May, whose patience, support and encouragement have made this project possible. Last but not least, a lovely thanks are due to my kids, Sajjad and Zahraa, from whom I have
Recommended publications
  • Shakespeare and Brecht: a Study of Dialectic Structures in Shakespearean Drama Amd the Ir Influence Om Brecht's Theatre Amd Dramatic Theory
    University College London SHAKESPEARE AND BRECHT: A STUDY OF DIALECTIC STRUCTURES IN SHAKESPEAREAN DRAMA AMD THE IR INFLUENCE OM BRECHT'S THEATRE AMD DRAMATIC THEORY. Submitted for the degree of PhD at The University of London. DOC ROSSI 1991 1 ProQuest Number: 10609419 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10609419 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT This thesis explores aspects of Brecht's adaptations of Shakespeare's plots and rhetoric while focusing particularly on matters of structural influence. Both authors use metafictional references in their plays to foreground a stylised artificiality, thereby pointing to the interaction of social and literary semiotics. These 'alienating' strategies expose the construction and the limitations of ideologies presented in a play, demanding recognition of the dialectical processes thus engaged. The study of Brecht's theory and practice against the background of Shakespeare's drama produces new insight into B:recht's works; similarly, Shakespeare's plays viewed against the background of Brecht's theatre and dramatic theory provide new insight into Shakespeare's literary practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Saccio
    William Shakespeare: Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies Part I Professor Peter Saccio THE TEACHING COMPANY ® Peter Saccio, Ph.D. Leon D. Black Professor of Shakespearean Studies Dartmouth College Peter Saccio has taught at Dartmouth College since 1966. He chaired the English department from 1984 to 1988; in addition, he has won Dartmouth’s J. Kenneth Huntington Memorial Award for Outstanding Teaching. He has served as visiting professor at Wesleyan University and at University College in London. He received a B.A. from Yale University and a Ph.D. from Princeton. He is the author of The Court Comedies of John Lyly (1969) and Shakespeare's English Kings (1977), the latter a classic in its field. He edited Middleton’s comedy A Mad World, My Masters for the Oxford Complete Works of Thomas Middleton (1996). He has published or delivered at conferences more than twenty papers on Shakespeare and other dramatists. Professor Saccio has directed productions of Twelfth Night, Macbeth, and Cymbeline. He has devised and directed several programs of scenes from Shakespeare and from modern British drama, and he served as dramaturg for the productions of his Dartmouth colleagues. He has acted the Shakespearean roles of Casca, Angelo, Bassanio, and Henry IV as well as various parts in the ancient plays of Plautus and the modern plays of Harold Pinter, Tom Stoppard, and Peter Shaffer. ©1999 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership i Table of Contents William Shakespeare: Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies Part I Professor Biography ........................................................................................... i Foreword .......... ................................................................................................. 1 Lecture One Shakespeare Then and Now...................................... 3 Lecture Two The Nature of Shakespeare’s Plays..........................
    [Show full text]
  • 25-2-W2016.Pdf
    The ESSE Messenger A Publication of ESSE (The European Society for the Study of English Vol. 25-2 Winter 2016 ISSN 2518-3567 All material published in the ESSE Messenger is © Copyright of ESSE and of individual contributors, unless otherwise stated. Requests for permissions to reproduce such material should be addressed to the Editor. Editor: Dr. Adrian Radu Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Faculty of Letters Department of English Str. Horea nr. 31 400202 Cluj-Napoca Romania Email address: [email protected] Cover illustration: Gower Memorial to Shakespeare, Stratford-upon-Avon This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Picture credit: Immanuel Giel Contents Shakespeare Lives 5 Europe, like Hamlet; or, Hamlet as a mousetrap J. Manuel Barbeito Varela 5 Star-crossed Lovers in Sarajevo in 2002 Ifeta Čirić-Fazlija 14 Shakespeare on Screen José Ramón Díaz Fernández 26 The Interaction of Fate and Free Will in Shakespeare’s Hamlet Özge Özkan Gürcü 57 The Relationship between Literature and Popular Fiction in Shakespeare’s Richard III Jelena Pataki 67 Re-thinking Hamlet in the 21st Century Ana Penjak 79 Reviews 91 Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian and Carla Jonsson (eds.), Language Mixing and Code-Switching in Writing: Approaches to Mixed-Language Written Discourse (New York & London: Routledge, 2014). 91 Bernard De Meyer and Neil Ten Kortenaar (eds.), The Changing Face of African Literature / Les nouveaux visages de la litterature africaine (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2009). 93 Derek Hand, A History of the Irish Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011). 95 Hobby Elaine.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana College Course Outline Discipline, Number
    http://www.curricunet.com/SAC/reports/course_outline_html.cfm... SANTA ANA COLLEGE COURSE OUTLINE DISCIPLINE, NUMBER, TITLE:English 233B, Shakespeare's Tragedies and History Plays (If the discipline, number or title is being revised, above should reflect the NEW information;) AND, the complete former course name MUST be included in the CATALOG ENTRY below.) CATALOG ENTRY Discipline English Course Number 233B Course Title Shakespeare's Tragedies and History Plays Former Title Units 3 Lecture Hours 48 Laboratory Hours None Arranged Hours None Total Semester Contact Hours None COURSE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(S) (C-ID) PREREQUISITE(S) Prerequisite English 101 or 101H. CATALOG DESCRIPTION Study of selected Shakespearean history plays and tragedies. Emphasizes dramatic elements, depiction of human nature, and timeless/timely conflicts. Augmented by films and, if available, appropriate field trips. Different selections in English 233ABCD. (Same as Theatre Arts 233B.) Budget Unit Classification Code Y Transfer Code A-Transferable to both UC and CSU Method of Instruction 10 SAM Priority Code E - Non-Occupational Repeatability NR - Non-Repeatable: D, F, NC, W TOPS Code 150100 - English (Writing) Topics Course No Open Entry/Exit No Grading Options Curriculum Office Use Only. Department Chair Approval Date: Divison Chair Approval Date: Curriculum and Instruction Council Chair Approval Date: COURSE CONTENT (Include major topics of the course, time required, and what the student is expected to learn.) All activities require critical thinking skills and the ability to apply college level concepts, vocabulary and learning skills. Introduction to Shakespeare's England and Theatre (3 hours) 1 of 6 8/23/12 8:56 PM http://www.curricunet.com/SAC/reports/course_outline_html.cfm..
    [Show full text]
  • ENG 3802-001 William Searle Eastern Illinois University
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Spring 2004 2004 Spring 1-15-2004 ENG 3802-001 William Searle Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/english_syllabi_spring2004 Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Searle, William, "ENG 3802-001" (2004). Spring 2004. 117. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/english_syllabi_spring2004/117 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the 2004 at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Spring 2004 by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dr. William J. Searle English 3802-sec.001-10:00 to 10:50-MWF-CH 3150 Office Number: CH 3371 (314B) Office Phone: 581-6375; e-mail: cfods\li:•eiu.cdu Office Hours: 11:00 to 11:50 MWF; 3:00 to 3:50 Wed. and by appointment David Bevington, Editor. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. Fifth Edition. New York. New York: Pearson/Longman, 2004. General Comments: Your participation (in the form of comments, responses, questions, etc.) is essential to the quality of this course. Initially, particularly in Shakespeare's early histories (like Richard III, for instance), the language itself-reflecting the worldview, syntax, and vocabulary of the Renaissance and early seventeenth century-may provide an obstacle between us and the texts. That difficulty, however, should pass quickly, though few, if any, of Shakespeare's histories or tragedies are quick reads. The comedies, where we begin, should be easier. If you do have difficulty reading the texts, try, and I am serious about this, listening to records or audio cassettes of the plays in the library.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circular Staircase
    Cambridge University Press 0521626331 - Shakespeare and Domestic Loss: Forms of Deprivation, Mourning, and Recuperation - Heather Dubrow Excerpt More information 1 Introduction: the circular staircase I If the title Love's Labor's Won does indeed refer to a lost play by Shakespeare, it is but one of many. His dramas repeatedly incorporate traces of different plays he might have written. Fragments of other genres often appear, whether as splinters painfully piercing the surface of the play or as guests convivially welcomed within. Marcade, a messenger not only from the court but also from the domain of tragedy, complicates comedic closure; ``Pyramus and Thisbe'' famously demonstrates what its host play might have become.1 Less familiar than such episodes but no less important are the momentary suggestions of lost plots and possi- bilities, often present only in a few lines of dialogue. France's farewell lines in King Lear (``Thy dow'rless daughter, King, thrown to my chance, / Is queen of us, of ours, and our fair France'' [I.i.256±257]) gesture towards a comedy that could have ended on a declaration very much like his. The Prince's passing ¯irtation with Beatrice (Much Ado About Nothing, II.i.326±330), a moment that deserves more attention than it has received, itself ¯irts with an alternative narrative. And the intima- tions of homoerotic plots recently traced by a number of critics suggest that gender, like genre, might have been constructed very differently. Much as the interrupted sentences that ®gure prominently in the more literal syntax of so many plays hint at lost words, thoughts, and agendas, so moments like the Prince's approach to Beatrice temporarily break the syntax of the dramas in which they appear, thus enacting the preoccu- pation with loss in its many forms that is as fundamental to Shake- speare's plays and poems as it is to poststructuralist theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespearean Character Fictions: Contemporary Re-Representations of Ophelia, Desdemona, and Juliet
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarBank@NUS Shakespearean Character Fictions: Contemporary Re-representations of Ophelia, Desdemona, and Juliet Chong Ping Yew Christine A Thesis Submitted for a Masters in Arts Department of English Language and Literature National University of Singapore 2012 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people, without whom this thesis would not have been possible: Assoc Prof Walter Lim, for his kind suggestions in the formulation of the thesis, Jobian patience when dealing with my drafts and for constantly encouraging me to produce the best possible work. Mr. Jeff Harris, Mr. James Ho, for sparking my interest in Shakespeare when I was 17 and Dr. James Stone, for introducing me to new ways of approaching Shakespeare at the graduate level. The Graduate Research Roommates, for bouncing ideas with me, the sense of an intellectual community, practical feedback and mutual support. My army of editors, who soldiered through the drafts with me and highlighted the grammatical and logical errors I overlooked. My friends, near and far, old and new, who believed in me, offered encouragement and emotional support, and my family, for allowing me the freedom to undertake my masters degree. i Contents Introduction The Politics of Adaptation: Contemporising Shakespeare’s 1–18 Heroines Chapter 1 Ophelia in Young Adult Fiction: Constructing the Post-feminist 19–45 Teenager Chapter 2 From Victim to Oppressor: Desdemona as White Liberal in 46–74 Second-Wave Feminism Chapter 3 Desiring Shakespeare Romeo and Juliet: Nostalgia and the 75–101 Impossibility of Knowing Conclusion Shakespeare’s Young Women: Moving From Conservative to 102–108 Contemporary Works Cited 109 – 115 ii Abstract Adaptation of Shakespeare’s plays is not new and occurred even in Shakespeare’s lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare's History Plays
    THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO SHAKESPEARE’S HISTORY PLAYS EDITED BY MICHAEL HATTAWAY published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru,UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2002 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensingagreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2002 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeface Sabon 10/13 pt System LATEX 2ε [tb] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library isbn 0 521 77277 x hardback isbn 0 521 77539 6 paperback CONTENTS List of figures page ix List of contributors xi List of abbreviations xii Chronology xv part 1:contexts 1 The Shakespearean history play 3 michael hattaway 2 Shakespeare and the early modern history play 25 a. j. hoenselaars 3 Pageants, masques, and history 41 david m. bergeron 4 Elizabethan historiography and Shakespeare’s sources 57 dominique goy-blanquet 5 Women’s roles in the Elizabethan history plays 71 phyllis rackin part 2:the plays 6 Plantagenets, Lancastrians, Yorkists, and Tudors: 1–3 Henry VI,Richard III , Edward III 89 janis lull 7 Historical legacy and fiction: the poetical reinvention of KingRichard III 106 marie-hel´ ene` besnault and michel bitot 8 King John: changing perspectives 126 a.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's History Plays
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-77539-7 - The Cambridge Companion to: Shakespeare’s History Plays Edited by Michael Hattaway Frontmatter More information The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s History Plays Shakespeare’s history plays have been performed more in recent years than ever before, in Britain, North America, and in Europe. This volume provides an accessible, wide-ranging, and informed introduction to Shakespeare’s history and Roman plays. It is attentive throughout to the plays as they have been performed over the centuries since they were written. The first part offers accounts of the genre of the history play, of Renaissance historiography, of pageants and masques, and of women’s roles, as well as comparisons with history plays in Spain and the Netherlands. Chapters in the second part look at individual plays as well as other Shakespearean texts which are closely related to the histories. The Companion offers a full bibliography, genealogical tables, and a list of principal and recurrent characters. It is a comprehensive guide for students, researchers, and theatre-goers alike. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-77539-7 - The Cambridge Companion to: Shakespeare’s History Plays Edited by Michael Hattaway Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-77539-7 - The Cambridge Companion to: Shakespeare’s History Plays Edited by Michael Hattaway Frontmatter More information CAMBRIDGE COMPANIONS TO LITERATURE The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy The Cambridge Companion to the Victorian edited by P. E.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Individuality of Shakespeare's History Plays
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository REWRITING HISTORY: EXPLORING THE INDIVIDUALITY OF SHAKESPEARE’S HISTORY PLAYS by PETER ROBERT ORFORD A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The Shakespeare Institute The University of Birmingham January 2006 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract ‘Rewriting History’ is a reappraisal of Shakespeare’s history cycle, exploring its origins, its popularity and its effects before challenging its dominance on critical and theatrical perceptions of the history plays. A critical history of the cycle shows how external factors such as patriotism, bardolatory, character-focused criticism and the editorial decision of the First Folio are responsible for the cycle, more so than any inherent aspects of the plays. The performance history of the cycle charts the initial innovations made in the twentieth century which have affected our perception of characters and key scenes in the texts. I then argue how the cycle has become increasingly restrictive, lacking innovation and consequently undervaluing the potential of the histories.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare Association of America April 10, 2014 St. Louis MO
    Shakespeare Association of America April 10, 2014 St. Louis MO SEMINAR: “Slavery, Captivity and Piracy in Early Modern Writing” ABSTRACTS Abdulhamit Arvas Michigan State University Ganimets and Ganymedes, or Prospero’s Boys My paper explores the link between sexual and territorial domination through an investigation of the circulating boys as objects in the early modern period together with the rise of the Ganymede images and other visual images of the abducted of the boys -- “lovely boy(s), stolen from an Indian king(s)” as referred in A Midsummer Night’s Dream (2.1. 389)—in England and the Mediterranean. Just like Ganymede, abducted by Zeus as “booty” after the Trojan War, the Christian youth are taken by the Ottomans as ganimet (booty) after their victories in wars. The Ottomans have a policy of abducting young boys from their Christian territories, and bringing them to Istanbul, the capital city of the Empire, in order to turn them Turk, and train and educate them for the future offices of the State. This practice ostensibly is not free from its association with rape of and sexual domination over Christian youth. John Ravlis, for example, narrates tales about “a hundred handsome youths compelled to turn Turks, or made subject to more vile prostitution, and all English.” Similarly, J.M. Gramaye reports that the Christian children captured by pirates were sent as presents to “Turke or his Bassas [to satisfy their] Sodomitical lusts for Boyes.” Thomas Coryat also states “The Turkes are exceedingly given to Sodomie, and therefore divers keep prettie boyes to abuse them by preposterous venerie.” While English travelers and writers criticize the Ottomans’ sexual practices and their abduction of boys as ganimet, we see similar practices and representations of the abduction of boys in English works, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare's Histories
    Shakespeare’s Histories Edited by Emma Smith Shakespeare’s Histories Also edited by Emma Smith Shakespeare’s Comedies Shakespeare’s Tragedies Also available from Blackwell Publishing Shakespeare David Bevington Shakespeare by Stages: An Historical Introduction Arthur F. Kinney Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945–2000 Edited by Russ McDonald Shakespeare’s Theater: A Sourcebook Edited by Tanya Pollard A Companion to Shakespeare Edited by David Scott Kastan A Feminist Companion to Shakespeare Edited by Dympna Callaghan A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies Edited by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume II: The Histories Edited by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume III: The Comedies Edited by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume IV: The Poems, Problem Comedies, Late Plays Edited by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard For further details about these titles, visit the Blackwell Publishing website at: www.blackwellpublishing.com To receive regular e-mail updates on new publications in your field, register for Blackwell E-mail Alerts at: www.blackwellpublishing.com/ealerts Shakespeare’s Histories Edited by Emma Smith Editorial material and organization # 2004 by Emma Smith 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Emma Smith to be identified as the Author of the Editorial Material in this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]