DOCSLIB.ORG

Dr. Konstantinos P. Balomenos Director General of General Directorate of National Defence Policy & International Relations Hellenic Ministry of National Defence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dr. Konstantinos P. Balomenos Director General of General Directorate of National Defence Policy & International Relations Hellenic Ministry of National Defence CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. Konstantinos P. Balomenos Director General of General Directorate of National Defence Policy & International Relations Hellenic Ministry of National Defence Konstantinos Balomenos was born in Athens in 1968. He is a Political and International Relations scientist. He holds a degree on Administration and Economy from the Technological Educational Institute of Chalkis, as well as a degree from the Faculty of International and European Studies of Panteion University. He holds a Master of Science (MSc) on Marketing & Communication with New Technologies from Athens University of Economics and Business. He holds a PhD from the Faculty of International and European Studies of the University of Piraeus. His thesis is entitled “The Strategic communication as a strategic tool and soft power factor in resolving international and business crises”, and was awarded an “Excellent” mark. He is the author of the monograph: "Turkey's Strategic Communication campaign in operation "Peace Spring", and of the books: "International Terrorism and Strategic Communication-Terrorist Crisis Management", "Greek-Turkish relations” and “Public opinion research on Management of the Greek-Turkish Crisis". He began his career in 1984 in the private sector in parallel with his studies and while doing his service in the Hellenic Air Force. For many years, he had been working as communication consultant specialising in Marketing, Crisis Communication Management, as well as Strategic Communication. He served as non-permanent staff at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and as a scientific collaborator at the office of the former Greek Prime Minister, Mr. Konstantinos Mitsotakis. Since 2007 he has been teaching at the Hellenic National Defence College (HNDC) and other Hellenic military institutions (the Air Force War College, the Military Academy, the National Security College) giving lectures on Public Relations, Strategic Communication, Crisis Management, Psychological and Information operations, Media and Public Awareness Management in crises and emergency situations. He is a Special Scientific Associate of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, teaching at the Master Course (“Crisis Management in the Area of Health Care” program). ./. CURRICULUM VITAE He is an accredited instructor in the Registry of the main educational staff of the National Centre for Public Administration and Local Government (EKDDA). He has delivered numerous speeches in a great number of training seminars, workshops, and training exercises of the Hellenic Armed Forces. He is the GR national expert in the NATO Independent Scientific Evaluation Group in the area of “Crisis Management, Crisis Communication Management and, Strategic Communication”, for the NATO “Science for Peace and Security” programme (SPS). He is member of the Air Academy of Greece, and of the Economic Chamber of Greece. He is a member of the European Communication Research and Education Association (ECREA), as well as of the Research Institute for European and American Studies (RIEAS). He is also a member of the Coordination Committee on issues regarding the Response to natural disasters and crises, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, responsible for the elaboration of a Support Plan for the State, in case of man-made or natural disasters and crises. In 2019 he served as a special advisor to the Greek Minister of National Defence, Mr. Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos. From December 17, 2019 he has assumed the responsibilities of the General Director of National Defence Policy and International Relations of the Hellenic MOD. He speaks the English language. ./. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Greek New Right and the Eve of Conservative Populism
    The Visio Journal ● Volume 4 ● 2019 The Greek New Right and the Eve of Conservative Populism By Athanasios Grammenos* The economic crisis in the Eurozone and its dire consequences for Greece terminated the post-1974 political consensus, which was based on a pro-European and democratic concord. The collapse of the social-democratic Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) in 2012 allowed space for the radical Left to become the new pole of the political system. To this advancement, the conservatives, being the other pole, responded with a prompt enlargement attempt to the populist right-wing, engulfing several elements of the New Right. This new political order had had evident effects on the party’s social and economic agenda, escalating the political debate at the expense of established liberal principles. While in opposition (2015-2019), New Democracy (ND), member of the European Peo- ple’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament, voted against a series of liberal bills (gender issues, separation of Church and State, the Macedonian issue, etc.) giving out positions with authoritarian and populist essence. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the rise of the New Right in Greece (2012-2019) in both rhetoric and practice, and its consequences for law institutions, human rights and foreign affairs. It is argued that ND, currently holding office, has been occupied by deeply conservative elements as a response to the rise of the radical Left, adopting occasionally ultra-conservative positions in a wide range of social issues. Although the case of Greece is unlike to those in other European countries, nevertheless, to the extent to which the preservation of traditional hierarchies come into question, the political platform of the Greek New Right, which has embedded authoritarian attitudes cultivating an anti-liberal sub-culture to the party’s voters, is in accordance with several European conservative movements like in Hungary, Austria or Czechia.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Im/Politeness Via Humor in the Greek Parliament Marianthi Georgalidou University of the Aegean [email protected]
    Georgalidou, Marian. Negotiating Im/politeness via Humor in the Greek Parlament Estudios de Lingüística del Español 43 (2021), pp. 99-121 Negotiating Im/politeness via Humor in the Greek Parliament Marianthi Georgalidou University of the Aegean [email protected] Resumen El objetivo de este estudio es examinar la manera en la que el humor sirve como medio de negociación des/cortés en el discurso de los parlamentarios griegos. (Harris 2001; Morreall 2005; Bippus 2007; Tsakona and Popa 2011; Georgalidou 2011). El humor ha sido abordado como una estrategia de cortesía positiva, en el sentido de mitigar el ataque directo a personas, situaciones o ideas y sirve como medio de crítica indirecta (Haugh 2016). No obstante, el humor -y la ironía- en el disrcurso parlamentario se usa para lanzar ataques contra adversarios y sirve como un medio de construcción de identidades políticas perjudiciales para los adversarios políticos (Tsakona 2011; Nuolijärvi and Tiittula 2011). En el contexto de la crisis económica que atravesó Grecia, el presente estudio basado en datos recopilados de las Actas de las Sesiones Plenarias del Parlamento Helénico durante un período de 10 años (2009-2019), analiza la relación entre el humor y la agresión verbal en el discurso político griego. Las cuestiones abordadas conciernen al humor como modo de comunicación en casos de conflictos que superan los límites de la rivalidad política en el discurso parlamentario (Corranza-Marquez 2010; Georgalidou 2016; Frantzi, Georgalidou and Giakoumakis 2019). La aproximación analítica es émica, basada en el análisis de unidades discursivas como acciones sociales. Por tanto, se analizan episodios de discurso parlamentario agresivo por la organización secuencial de interacción humorística.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Terrorism in Greece from 1975 to 2009
    Research Paper No. 158 Georgia Chantzi (Associate in the International Centre for Black Sea Studies, ICBSS) THE EVOLUTION OF TERRORISM IN GREECE FROM 1975 TO 2009 Copyright: University of Coventry, (Dissertation in the Humanities and Social Science), UK. PS. Mrs. Georgia Chantzi permitted RIEAS to publish her Research Thesis (MA). RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN STUDIES (RIEAS) # 1, Kalavryton Street, Alimos, Athens, 17456, Greece RIEAS URL:http://www.rieas.gr 1 RIEAS MISSION STATEMENT Objective The objective of the Research Institute for European and American Studies (RIEAS) is to promote the understanding of international affairs. Special attention is devoted to transatlantic relations, intelligence studies and terrorism, European integration, international security, Balkan and Mediterranean studies, Russian foreign policy as well as policy making on national and international markets. Activities The Research Institute for European and American Studies seeks to achieve this objective through research, by publishing its research papers on international politics and intelligence studies, organizing seminars, as well as providing analyses via its web site. The Institute maintains a library and documentation center. RIEAS is an institute with an international focus. Young analysts, journalists, military personnel as well as academicians are frequently invited to give lectures and to take part in seminars. RIEAS maintains regular contact with other major research institutes throughout Europe and the United States and, together with similar institutes in Western Europe, Middle East, Russia and Southeast Asia. Status The Research Institute for European and American Studies is a non-profit research institute established under Greek law. RIEAS‟s budget is generated by membership subscriptions, donations from individuals and foundations, as well as from various research projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 1055315.En Pe 553.776
    Question for written answer E-004628/2015 to the Commission Rule 130 Eleftherios Synadinos (NI) Subject: State and European aid for foundations established by former Greek Prime Ministers According to recent articles,1 2 3 six foundations established by former Greek Prime Ministers, namely Eleftherios Venizelos, Georgios Papandreou, Konstantinos Karamanlis, Andreas Papandreou, Konstantinos Mitsotakis and Kostas Simitis, are currently operating in Greece. These foundations have always enjoyed absurd privileges totally out of keeping with their (non- existent) work, especially as the founders’ progeny sit on their boards of directors. One of those privileges is that they are ‘administratively and financially independent’, meaning that they can be paid government grants but are not obliged to render account or report financial data to the Greek Government. They also enjoy what can only be described as insulting tax immunity under an unprecedented and unfair system of tax relief at the Greek people’s expense. Finally, the Greek State has handed over property and land to these foundations absolutely free of charge under a completely non-transparent system. In view of the above, and given that these foundations are entitled to participate in Community programmes funded by the EU (80 %) and from national resources (20 %), will the Commission say: – whether it intends to request official figures on the amount and method of funding of these foundations and financial statements for reasons of transparency and to inform the public? 1 http://www.newsbomb.gr/ellada/apokalypseis/story/277964/lefta-gia-to-lao-haristikan-se-idrymata-proin 2 http://www.newsbomb.gr/ellada/apokalypseis/story/277645/harizoyn-ellada-kai-se-pethamenoys- prothypoyrgoys 3 http://elevengr.blogspot.be/2013/09/blog-post_9.html 1055315.EN PE 553.776 .
    [Show full text]
  • Session ID 23 Session Title Museum Archaeology
    <!DOCTYPE html> Session ID 23 Session Title Museum Archaeology: Thinking Through Collections Start Time Wed Dec 18 14:00:00 Room 731/6 There are several common misconceptions around museum archaeology. These include the assumption that it is simply a set of procedures for managing and exhibiting assemblages at the end of the archaeological process, and that it has had little impact on the development of, or relevance to, archaeological theory or museum going publics. This session seeks to challenge such characterisations and extend theorisation beyond gallery display to develop museum archaeology as a distinct area of reflexive individual and institutional research and practices integral to the broader discipline. In so doing, this session recognises museum archaeology as a political arena with an obligation to address recent discourses around class, gender, race, the public presentation of past peoples, and decolonisation. What is prioritised by and researched in museums, by whom, how and why? How do museum practices of assembly and reassembly of objects shape archaeological knowledge? How is archaeological praxis transformed or reinforced by the museum? What role does the museum visitor have? Papers are invited that problematise and suggest new ways of thinking about historic, contemporary and future relationships between archaeological theory, museum collections, and the public, as well as the array of institutional and cultural paradigms through which archaeological enquiries are mediated and represented. Case studies and theoretical considerations that engage with the nature and status in the museum of archival field notes, photographic media, archaeological samples and replicas, alongside artefact assemblages, are encouraged. Similarly, papers that consider core museum practices (like documentation, cataloguing, storage, conservation and visitor engagement) as socially embedded and historically produced activities, rather than straightforward logistical issues, are welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Greek Premier Mitsotakis Remembered Lanthimos Best
    S o C V ΓΡΑΦΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ nd W ΤΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ E ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 1915 The National Herald 10 2 N anniversa ry www.thenationalherald.com A weekly Greek-AmeriCAN PubliCAtioN 1915-2017 VOL. 20, ISSUE 1025 June 3-9, 2017 c v $1.50 Ex-Premier Papademos’ Wife Says Bomb Hidden in CD Probe continues into domestic terrorism bombing and suspicious envelopes TNH Staff ATHENS – A bomb that went off inside the car of former Greek interim Premier Lucas Pa - pademos was hidden in a CD case inside a manila envelope that had first been left outside their home, his wife said as the probe continued into who sent it. Shanna Ingram-Papademos, who spoke during a morning current affairs program, said the large envelope had first passed through a bomb detection de - vice in Parliament before being hauled to the couple’s home in the upscale district of Paleo Faliro, the Greek capital’s “diplo - matic row”, where it remained tNh ArChiVes with other correspondence out - Former Greek interim Premier side for 24 hours. Lucas Papademos eurokiNissi She also said her husband, a With traditional Cretan songs and a solemn ceremony, Constantine Mitsotakis (insert photo) was laid to rest in Crete beside his former vice-president of one of the newspaper Kathimerini they late wife Marika. His son Kyriakos Mitsotakis delivered heartfelt words about his father at the state funeral in Athens. Greece’s lenders, the European were uncertain about that ac - Central Bank, and now vice- count from the unnamed person president of the prestigious re - who has been part of Pa - search-driven Academy of pademos’ security detail for sev - Former Greek Premier Mitsotakis Remembered Athens, was “lucky” not to have eral years.
    [Show full text]
  • Koliastasis P Phd 280714.Pdf
    Title The permanent campaign strategy of Greek Prime Ministers (1996–2011) Candidate Panagiotis Koliastasis Degree This thesis is submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 4 Abstract Various academic authors have analysed the implementation, the causes and the impact of the permanent campaign strategy by political executives in presidential and parliamentary systems, notably the United States and United Kingdom. This study builds on this literature and extends the research on the permanent campaign in the European parliamentary majoritarian context by examining contemporary Greece as a national case study. In particular, the study addresses three questions. First, did contemporary Greek Prime Ministers adopt the permanent campaign strategy? Second, why did they do so? Third, what impact did the implementation of the permanent campaign have on their public approval? The research focuses on the cases of three successive Prime Ministers in Greece: Costas Simitis (1996–2004), Kostas Karamanlis (2004–2009) and George Papandreou (2009-2011). Simitis and Papandreou were leaders of the centre-left PASOK, while Karamanlis was the leader of the centre-right New Democracy. The study finds that all three Prime Ministers undertook the permanent campaign strategy in order to maintain public approval, aligning themselves with their British and American counterparts. They established new communication units within the primeministerial apparatus, consulted with communication professionals to form a coherent communication
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. Konstantinos P. Balomenos
    CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. Konstantinos P. Balomenos Konstantinos Balomenos was born in Athens in 1968. He is a Political and International Relations scientist. He holds a bachelor on Administration and Economy of the Technological Educational Institution of Chalkis, a bachelor from the Faculty of International and European Studies of Panteion University, and a Master of Science (MSc) on Marketing & Communication with New Technologies from Athens University of Economics and Business. In addition, he holds a PhD from the Faculty of International and European Studies of the University of Piraeus. The title of his thesis, awarded an “Excellent” mark, is: “The Strategic communication as a strategic tool and soft power factor in resolving international and business crises”. He started to work in 1984 in the private sector, in parallel with his studies and while doing his service in the Hellenic Air Force. For many years, he had been working as communication consultant, in the private sector, specialising in Marketing, Crisis Communication Management, as well as Strategic Communication. In addition, he served as non-permanent staff at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and as a scientific collaborator at the office of the former Greek Prime Minister, Mr. Konstantinos Mitsotakis. Since 2007 he has been serving as a course tutor/seminar speaker at the Hellenic National Defence College (HNDC) and other Hellenic military institutions (such as the Air Force War College, the Military Academy, the National Security College, etc) on issues related to Public Relations, Strategic Communication, Crisis Management, Psychological and Information operations, Media and Public Awareness Management in crises and emergency situations. In parallel, he is a specialised scientific collaborator of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, teaching at the Master’s degree “Crisis Management in the area of Healthcare” programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Forgetting: New Zealand-Greek Wartime Relationship
    Politics of Forgetting: New Zealand-Greek Wartime Relationship Martyn Brown Bachelor of Arts Graduate Diploma Library Science Graduate Diploma Information Technology Post-Graduate Diploma Business Research Master of Arts (Research) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of History Philosophy Religion and Classics Abstract In extant New Zealand literature and national public commemoration, the New Zealand experience of wartime Greece largely focuses on the Battle of Crete in May 1941 and, to a lesser extent, on the failed earlier mainland campaign. At a politico-military level, the ill-fated Greek venture and the loss of Crete hold centre stage in the discourse. In terms of commemoration, the Battle of Crete dominates as an iconic episode in the national history of New Zealand. As far as the Greeks are concerned, New Zealand elevates and embraces Greek civilians to the point where they overshadow the Greek military. The New Zealand drive to place the Battle of Crete as supporting its national self-imagining has been achieved, but what has been forgotten in the process? The wartime connection between the Pacific nation and Greece lasted for the remainder of the international conflict and was highly complex and sometimes violent. In occupied Greece and Crete, as well as in the Middle East, North Africa and Italy, New Zealand forces had to interact with a divided Greek nation that had been experiencing ongoing political turmoil and intermittent civil conflict. Individual New Zealanders found themselves acting as liaison officers with competing partisan groups. Greek military units with a history of mutiny and political intrigue were affiliated with the main New Zealand fighting force, the Second New Zealand Division.
    [Show full text]
  • KAS Greece Political Academy
    PROGRAM ME CHANIA- CRETE | 2-4 DECEMBER 2016 KAS Greece Political Academy Friday, 2.12.2016 17:00 Welcome Susanna Vogt, Head of Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Greece Pantelis Virvidakis, General Director of the Konstantinos K. Mitsotakis Foundation Μessage by Konstantinos Mitsotakis, former Prime Minister of Greece Introduction to the KAS Political Academy Jeroen Kohls, Research Associate, KAS Greece Dr. Antonis Klapsis, Adjunct Lecturer, Hellenic Open University 19:30 Keynote speech On Becoming a Politician: The Whys and Hows Dora Bakoyannis, Member of Parliament, former Minister, former Mayor of Athens Saturday, 3.12.2016 09:30 How to Campaign in Politics Sofia Zacharaki, Alternate Spokesperson of Nea Dimokratia 11:30 The Migration Challenge in Greece and the EU Giannis Plakiotakis, Former President of Nea Dimokratia, Member of Parliament 12:30 The Necessity of Reforms in Public Administration Lefteris Avgenakis, Secretary of the Political Committee of Nea Dimokratia, Member of Parliament 15:00 Being a Young Politician in Greece Giannis Kefalogiannis, Parliamentary spokesperson of Nea Dimokratia, Member of Parliament Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung | Greece Office | www.kas.de/griechenland | https://www.facebook.com/kas.athen Mourouzi 8 | 10674 Athens | Greece | T +30 210 7247 126 | E-Mail: [email protected] PROGRAM ME CHANIA- CRETE | 2-4 DECEMBER 2016 16:30 Political and Socioeconomic thought of the Centre-Right in Greece and the EU Professor Nikos Papadakis, Director of the Centre for Political Research & Documentation, Department of Political
    [Show full text]
  • After a Decade of Crisis, Greek Politics Are Turning Normal and More Technocratic
    The Washington Post Monkey Cage Analysis After a decade of crisis, Greek politics are turning normal and more technocratic The election seems to have consolidated competition. By Harris Mylonas July 14 Greek voters just elected the first government in which a single party won a parliamentary majority since the economic crisis began in 2010. On July 7, a little fewer than 6 million people voted in more than 21,000 polling stations to elect the 300 members of the Greek parliament and install a new government. Twenty parties ran; only six of them got more than 3 percent of the vote, which is the threshold required to place a member in parliament. Here’s what happened So, who won? It was New Democracy’s leader, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, the son of former prime minister Konstantinos Mitsotakis, who served from 1990 to 1993, and the brother of former New Democracy minister and former mayor of Athens Dora Bakoyanni. Mitsotakis managed to bring the party back to power after a difficult decade, with an impressive 39.85 percent of the vote and 158 seats in a 300-member parliament. Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, leader of the leftist Syriza party, lost, but he managed to keep his party’s vote share above 31.53 percent. As a result, New Democracy got a smaller lead than it had in last month’s European Union parliament elections, contrary to expectations. This result fortified his place at the helm of the main opposition party. Together, the two top parties received more than 70 percent of the vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism in Post-Democratic Times Greek Politics and the Limits of Consensus
    Populism in post-democratic times Greek politics and the limits of consensus Giorgos Katsambekis PhD Candidate School of Political Sciences Aristotle University of Thessaloniki [email protected] Paper presented at the 61st Political Studies Association Annual Conference 19 - 21 April 2011 Novotel London West Work in progress. Please do not cite or quote without author’s permission. Copyright PSA 2011 Introduction In this paper we focus on several kinds of transformations that have affected the Greek political system during the past fifteen years. Furthermore, we purport to discuss the role of populism in contemporary democracies (and its relation to democracy in general) and especially the rise of new types of populist phenomena in the contemporary Greek (post)democratic context. Starting with a brief account of the consolidation of democratic politics in post-authoritarian Greece, which was associated with the hegemony of a certain kind of (left-wing) populism,1 we will move to highlighting certain ‘signs’ of post-democratic change that emerged especially after 1996, when the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) and its leader Constantinos Simitis won the general elections held on that year (articulating an ideal-type anti-populist discourse, a Greek version of third way social-democratic politics).2 This post-democratic direction (without changing dramatically) acquired new contents and meaning(s) when the power passed from the centre-left PASOK to the centre-right party of New Democracy (ND) and Kostas Karamanlis (nephew of the first prime minister of post-authoritarian Greece, Konstantinos Karamanlis). The years from 1996 to 2009 seem to form a distinct period in the Greek post- authoritarian political and social history.
    [Show full text]