Auto Train Sanford Florida Directions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Summer 2007 TOD Sketchbook
Central Florida Commuter Rail Summer 2007 Central Florida Commuter Rail On the Inside: page Introduction ........................................ 1 DeLand Station................................... 5 Fort Florida Station ............................ 7 Sanford Station................................... 9 Lake Mary Station ............................ 11 Longwood Station............................. 13 Altamonte Springs Station................ 15 Maitland Station............................... 17 Winter Park Station.......................... 19 Florida Hospital Station ................... 21 LYNX Central Station......................... 23 Church Street Station........................ 25 Orlando Amtrak Station ................... 27 Sand Lake Road Station................... 29 Meadow Woods Station .................... 31 Osceola Parkway Station .................. 33 Kissimmee Station............................ 35 Poinciana Station.............................. 37 The Central Florida Commuter Rail project will provide the opportunity not only to move people more efficiently, but to also build new, walkable, transit-oriented communities around some of its stations and strengthen existing communities around others. In February 2007, FDOT conducted a week long charrette process, individually meeting with the agencies and major stakeholders from DeLand each of the jurisdictions along the proposed 61-mile commuter rail corridor. These The plans and concepts included: Volusia County, Seminole County, illustrated in this report Orange County, -
Functional Classification
City of Sanford Transportation Element TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT DATA, INVENTORY, AND ANALYSIS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS DATA, INVENTORY, AND ANALYSIS .........................................................................2-3 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS AND CONCEPTS ...............................................................2-4 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES.............................................................2-6 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ........................................2-7 Level of Service Calculation Methodology………..................................................2-7 Level of Service Standards ...................................................................................2-7 Existing (2009) Peak Hour Peak Direction Vehicle Trips ......................................2-7 Levels of Service and System Needs .................................................................2-11 Existing Modal Split and Vehicle Occupancy Rates............................................2-12 Existing Public Transit Facilities and Routes ......................................................2-12 Peak Hour Transit Capacities, Headways and Ridership by Route ....................2-13 Levels of Service and System Needs .................................................................2-14 Population Characteristics ..................................................................................2-14 Transportation Disadvantaged ............................................................................2-15 Existing Characteristics -
Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A. -
Atlantic Coast Service
ATLANTIC COAST SERVICE JANUARY 14, 2013 NEW YORK, VIRGINIA, the CAROLINAS, GEORGIA and FLORIDA Effective SM Enjoy the journey. featuring the SILVER METEOR ® CAROLINIAN SM SILVER STAR ® PALMETTO ® AUTO TRAIN ® PIEDMONT® 1-800-USA-RAIL Call serving NEW YORK–PHILADELPHIA WASHINGTON–RICHMOND–RALEIGH–CHARLOTTE CHARLESTON–SAVANNAH–JACKSONVILLE ORLANDO–KISSIMMEE–WINTER HAVEN TAMPA–ST. PETERSBURG–FT. MYERS WEST PALM BEACH–FT. LAUDERDALE–MIAMI and intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form T4–200M–1/14/13 Stock #02-3536 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. ATLANTIC COAST SERVICE Silver Silver Piedmont Piedmont Palmetto Carolinian Silver Star Train Name Silver Star Carolinian Palmetto Piedmont Piedmont Meteor Meteor 73 75 89 79 91 97 Train Number 98 92 80 90 74 76 Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Normal Days of Operation Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily R y R y R B R B R s R s R s R s R B R B R y R y l l y l å y l å r l r l On Board Service r l r l y l å y l å l l Read Down Mile Symbol Read Up R R R95 R93/83/ R82/154/ R R R 67 67 Mo-Fr 161 Connecting Train Number 174 66 66 66 9 30P 9 30P 6 10A 9 35A 0 Dp Boston, MA–South Sta. ∑w- Ar 6 25P 8 00A 8 00A 8 00A R9 36P R9 36P R6 15A R9 41A 1 Boston, MA–Back Bay Sta. -
Give Kids the World Celebrates 25 Years Remembering
50 CENTS 112TH YEAR • SATURDAY EDITION MAY 21, 2011 For the May Journal of Osceola County Business, see page B-1. The focus this month is on businesses that cater to the home and garden. OOSCEOLASCEOLA NNEWSEWS-G-GAZETTEAZETTE www.aroundosceola.com • www.holaosceola.com News-Gazette Photo/Fallan Patterson Give Kids The World Give Kids The World founder Henri Landwirth, center, receives help from Alyssa celebrates 25 years Pietruszka, 13, left, whose kid- By Fallan Patterson GKTW founder Henri Landwirth, accommodate another 70,000 ney cancer has 84, said. “Looking back, I never stars, was built. been in remis- Staff Writer thought it would grow as it has Dreams will always come true Ari Cohen was one of the last sion since her today.” as long as Give Kids The World is children to place his star in the After serving more than fist visit to the operating. Castle of Miracles. organization at 107,000 children from all 50 “When you walk in there, you Given the expansions unveiled states and 72 countries, the orga- age 3, to officially at the Kissimmee-based organiza- can feel (the children’s) soul and open the Gallery nization’s Castle of Miracles, where spirits,” Leah Cohen, Ari’s mother, tion’s 25th anniversary celebration of Hope visitor every ill child makes a wish and said. April 14, children with life-threat- places a star with their name on it center during the Not expected to live past his first ening illnesses will see their dreams on the ceiling, had filled up. To birthday due to a rare chromoso- charity’s 25th become reality for years to come. -
AMTRAK Information Ridership & Endpoint
AMTRAK Information Ridership & Endpoint OTP Virginia financially supports four Amtrak routes which connect the Commonwealth to destinations in the Northeast. Ridership for state-supported trains is listed below. Information is reported on the federal fiscal year (FFY) schedule (October – September). Second train to Norfolk, VA started March 4, 2019 and was an extension of a daily roundtrip between Washington D.C. and Richmond. Amtrak train schedules were optimized for Washington - Norfolk, Washington - Newport News and Washington - Richmond routes as part of start of second Norfolk train. Route 46 - Roanoke One daily roundtrip between Roanoke, VA and Washington, DC/Northeast Corridor Ridership Month FFY19 FFY18 % Chg. Oct 19,636 16,311 +20.4 Nov 20,509 19,357 +6.0 Dec 19,872 20,620 -3.6 Jan 14,862 15,163 -2.0 Feb 12,717 12,934 -1.7 Mar 17,509 16,338 +7.2 Apr 18,984 17,340 +9.5 May 19,535 18,189 +7.4 Jun Jul Aug Sep YTD 143,624 136,252 +5.4 Route 47 - Newport News Two daily roundtrips between Newport News, VA and Washington, D.C./Northeast Corridor Ridership Month FFY19 FFY18 % Chg. Oct 28,660 28,481 +0.6 Nov 32,502 31,124 +4.4 Dec 31,290 31,262 0.1 Jan 21,436 20,535 +4.4 Feb 19,986 19,049 +4.9 Mar 25,143 25,546 -1.6 Apr 28,001 25,043 +11.8 May 28,653 26,764 +7.1 Jun Jul Aug Sep YTD 215,671 207,804 +3.8 Route 50 - Norfolk Two daily roundtrips between Norfolk, VA and Washington, D.C./Northeast Corridor Ridership Month FFY19 FFY18 % Chg. -
Examining the Traffic Safety Effects of Urban Rail Transit
Examining the Traffic Safety Effects of Urban Rail Transit: A Review of the National Transit Database and a Before-After Analysis of the Orlando SunRail and Charlotte Lynx Systems April 15, 2020 Eric Dumbaugh, Ph.D. Dibakar Saha, Ph.D. Florida Atlantic University Candace Brakewood, Ph.D. Abubakr Ziedan University of Tennessee 1 www.roadsafety.unc.edu U.S. DOT Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated in the interest of information exchange. The report is funded, partially or entirely, by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program. However, the U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. Acknowledgement of Sponsorship This project was supported by the Collaborative Sciences Center for Road Safety, www.roadsafety.unc.edu, a U.S. Department of Transportation National University Transportation Center promoting safety. www.roadsafety.unc.edu 2 www.roadsafety.unc.edu TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. CSCRS-R{X}CSCRS-R18 4. Title and Subtitle: 5. Report Date Examining the Traffic Safety Effects of Urban Rail Transit: A Review April 15, 2020 of the National Transit Database and a Before-After Analysis of the 6. Performing Organization Code Orlando SunRail and Charlotte Lynx Systems 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Eric Dumbaugh, Ph.D. Dibakar Saha, Ph.D. Candace Brakewood, Ph.D. Abubakr Ziedan 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. -
Transportation Element Introduction
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT INTRODUCTION The Transportation Element is required by State law and has been prepared in compliance with State of Florida comprehensive planning requirements for local governments. The current Transportation Element and Comprehensive Plan established a framework for multimodal transportation planning within Seminole County. This approach to transportation planning recognized the links between transportation, economic development, land use and urban design. Since its adoption, the County and its seven cities have continued to improve transportation mobility and quality of life for residents through completion of roadway, sidewalk, trails and transit facilities. Many of these improvements were funded through the renewal of the Local Option One Cent Sales Tax approved by County voters in 2001. These improvements have been focused on areas of the County that were expected to provide the greatest return of benefits in terms of community and economic development. The improvements to the County Road System, in conjunction with improvements to the State Road System, will maintain Seminole County's position of having one of the best major road systems in the Central Florida Region for several years to come. While Seminole County should take pride in the community that it has created, it must also continue to address the challenges that past successes have created. The greatest challenge is to determine how to maintain the high level of mobility over the long term in order to sustain the future development of the County at the level its residents have come to expect. This challenge has been recognized through recent efforts to address transportation mobility through land use strategies. -
RAIL SYSTEM PLAN December 2018 Table of Contents
2015 FLORIDA RAIL SYSTEM PLAN December 2018 Table of Contents FLORIDA RAIL SYSTEM PLAN - 2018 UPDATE The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Freight and Multimodal Operations Office (FMO) present this 2018 update of the 2015 Florida Rail System Plan. As new challenges have had a great impact on the needs and future projects identified in the 2015 Rail System Plan, FDOT prepared this update. CHALLENGES • New State Rail Plan Guidance was created in 2013 to set a standard format and elaborate on required elements of the plan to include a 5-year update cycle, and a requirement for states seeking capital grants under Sections 301, 302, and 501. See https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0511. Thereafter, FDOT prepared a 2015 Rail System Plan that was completed in December 2015. The Plan was not published at that time, as major industry changes were expected and no public outreach had yet been conducted. • Major industry changes occurred that impacted most of the rail mileage in Florida: o CSX hired Hunter Harrison in spring of 2017, and radically changed the company by imposing precision-scheduled railroading instead of a hub-and-spoke system. This approach has been continued by CSX leadership through 2018. o Grupo México Transportes (GMXT), the leading rail freight transportation company in Mexico, successfully completed the acquisition of Florida East Coast Railway in 2017. o Brightline began service in 2018 between West Palm Beach, Ft. Lauderdale, and Miami later in the year, and with plans to connect to Orlando and potentially to Tampa in the future. APPROACH • The FAST Act (Title 49, Section 22702) passage in December 2015 changed the 5-year update cycle to a 4-year update cycle. -
Fact Sheet: Amtrak in Florida
Fact sheet: Amtrak in Florida Passengers in Florida, 2013-2019: Floridians near a station boarding & detraining (in thousands) Within 25 miles: 12,373,707 (66%) 1,099.3 Within 50 miles: 15,473,012 (82%) 1,067.5 1,016.9 936.4 Amtrak service in the state 909.2 885.0 905.4 Silver Star - Daily service Silver Meteor - Daily service Sunset Limited - suspended fall 2005 Auto Train - Daily service 24 Amtrak stations 2017 2018 2019 Chipley Crestview Deerfield Beach 23,407 21,895 21,066 DeLand 20,827 20,677 20,453 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Delray Beach 13,782 13,643 14,752 Fort Lauderdale 40,613 40,249 41,220 Quick recap, 2019 (arrivals and departures) Hollywood 24,312 22,348 21,652 Jacksonville 70,049 66,085 63,973 Coach/ First/ Kissimmee 35,416 34,774 35,726 Business Sleeper Total Lake City Passengers 740,354 165,002 905,356 Lakeland 5,305 5,040 5,400 Madison Average trip 496 miles 886 miles 567 miles Miami 64,485 63,500 62,766 Average fare $ 71.00 $293.00 $143.00 Okeechobee 3,935 3,988 4,109 Average yield, per mi 14.3¢ 33.1¢ 25.1¢ Orlando 128,831 123,990 127,187 Palatka 12,579 11,598 12,313 Top city pairs by ridership, 2019 Pensacola Sanford 228,894 224,818 236,035 1. Sanford - Lorton, VA 855 mi Sebring 15,214 13,848 14,083 2. Orlando - New York, NY 1,167 mi Tallahassee 3. Tampa - West Palm Beach 192 mi Tampa 106,534 105,664 110,312 4. -
BDV30-943-20Finalreport.Pdf
e Executive Summary There are many benefits to fixed route transit, although some of these may not be immediately realized or quantified. One potential long-term benefit of these investments is the development and real estate impacts induced by the transit system. Community support for public transit could come more easily if transit systems could demonstrate positive fiscal impacts beyond those achieved through fare box returns. Other than direct operating revenues generated largely from fares, transit systems have the potential to generate additional public revenues through catalyzing development around transit stations and along transit routes, yielding increased property values and property taxes. The quantification of these development-related revenue streams can be a useful input into fiscal analyses of transit investments, and may demonstrate that these systems offer a greater return on investment than traditional cost recovery measures might suggest. This report provides an assessment of the property value changes and development impacts that have occurred around SunRail stations since the system’s opening. Using property appraiser data, the study team estimates tax revenue impacts that resulted from property value changes around the stations. As detailed in this report, the evidence shows that development around stations has been highly variable across the system, with some stations having experienced modest to substantial new development and other no new development of note. However, the evidence does indicate that SunRail stations have generally outperformed control areas that were identified as part of this study. The evidence illustrates that SunRail has yielded some substantial positive property value impacts - and by extension increased property taxes – to the affected jurisdictions. -
Central Florida Commuter Rail Commission Technical Advisory Committee
Central Florida Commuter Rail Commission Technical Advisory Committee Date: January 15, 2020 Time: 2:00 p.m. Location: LYNX Central Station 2nd Floor Multi-Purpose Room 455 North Garland Avenue Orlando, Florida 32801 PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES I. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance II. Confirmation of Quorum III. Action Items a. Adoption of October 9, 2019 Meeting Minutes IV. Public Comments Comments from the public will be heard pertaining to General Information on the agenda for this meeting. People wishing to speak must complete a “Speakers Introduction Card” at the reception desk. Each speaker is limited to two minutes. V. Chair’s Report – Ms. Olore a. Transition Working Group Update VI. Discussion Items a. SunRail Staff Update – Jared Perdue, FDOT Interim Chief Executive Office b. Agency Update – Charles M. Heffinger, Jr., P.E. FDOT/SunRail Chief Operating Officer c. Bus Connectivity i. LYNX – Tomika Monterville, Director of Planning & Development Central Florida Commuter Rail Commission Technical Advisory Committee October 9, 2019 Page 1 of 2 Central Florida Commuter Rail Commission Technical Advisory Committee ii. Votran – Rob Stephens, General Manager VIII. Committee Member Comments IX. Next Meeting - Proposed April 15, 2020 2:00 p.m. LYNX Central Station 455 N. Garland Ave. 2nd Floor Multi-Purpose Room X. Adjournment Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. Persons who require accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act or persons who require translation services (free of charge) should contact Roger Masten, FDOT/SunRail Title VI Coordinator 801 SunRail Dr. Sanford, FL 32771, or by phone at 321-257-7161, or by email at [email protected] at least three business days prior to the event.