Connecting Kazakhstan. Connecting the World
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
KZ Report2018.Pdf
National Preventive Mechanism for the Prevention of Torture / CONSOLIDATED REPORT • 2016 / 1 CONSOLIDATED REPORT CONSOLIDATED REPORT Prepared by the National Preventive Mechanism Membersconsolidated on report the Preventive Prepared by the National Preventive MechanismVisits members Made on thein 2016Preventive Visits Made in 2017 National Preventive Mechanism for the Prevention of Torture Astana |2018 2017 Consolidated Report of the National Preventive Mechanism members on the preventive visits carried out in 2017, Astana, 2017 - 178 p. The Report has been drafted by the Coordination Council of NPM under the Comissioner for Human Rights and published with the support of the OSCE Programme Office in Astana and the Penal Reform International Representative Office in Central Asia The content of the document is the sole liability of the authors. CONTENTS 1. On some organizational issues of the National Preventive Mechanism in 2017 ............................. 7 2. Rights of convicts in correctional institutions of the Committee of the Criminal Execution System (CCES) under the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MoI RK) .............................15 3. The situation of persons detained in remand centres of the Committee of the Criminal Execution System (CCES) under the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MoI RK) .........................................31 4. The situation of persons held in temporary detention facilities and other institutions of the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Kazakhstan (MoI RK) .........67 5. The situation of persons held in institutions subordinated to the National Security Committee (NSC) of the Republic of Kazakhstan .............83 6. The situation of persons held in institutions under the Ministry of Defence .............................................89 7. -
Study on Border Crossing Practices in International Railway Transport
STUDY ON BORDER CROSSING PRACTICES IN INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY TRANSPORT Bangkok, 2018 This study was prepared by Transport Division ESCAP. The draft of the study was prepared by Mr. Goran Andreev, Consultant, under the supervision of Mr. Sandeep Raj Jain, Economic Affairs Officer, Transport Facilitation and Logistics Section (TFLS), Transport Division. Overall guidance was provided by Mr. Li Yuwei, Director, Transport Division. The study extensively benefited from the visits made by the ESCAP study team to several border crossings (in chronological order): Sukhbaatar (Mongolia), Dong Dang (Viet Nam), Padang Besar (Malaysia), Sarkhas (Islamic Republic of Iran), Rezekne (Latvia). The assistance provided by the railways, customs and other authorities at these border crossings, their officers and staff for the study is duly appreciated. Acknowledgments are also extended to the representatives of Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) and Organisation for Co- operation between Railways (OSJD), for their constructive comments on the draft Study and the contribution in providing valuable inputs on the publication. The views expressed in this guide are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. The opinions, figures and estimates set forth in this guide are the responsibility of the authors, and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this study do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. -
Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments
Munich Personal RePEc Archive Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments Lobyrev, Vitaly and Tikhomirov, Andrey and Tsukarev, Taras and Vinokurov, Evgeny Eurasian Development Bank, Institute of Economy and Transport Development 10 May 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86705/ MPRA Paper No. 86705, posted 18 May 2018 16:33 UTC BELT AND ROAD TRANSPORT CORRIDORS: BARRIERS AND INVESTMENTS Authors: Vitaly Lobyrev; Andrey Tikhomirov (Institute of Economy and Transport Development); Taras Tsukarev, PhD (Econ); Evgeny Vinokurov, PhD (Econ) (EDB Centre for Integration Studies). This report presents the results of an analysis of the impact that international freight traffic barriers have on logistics, transit potential, and development of transport corridors traversing EAEU member states. The authors of EDB Centre for Integration Studies Report No. 49 maintain that, if current railway freight rates and Chinese railway subsidies remain in place, by 2020 container traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis may reach 250,000 FEU. At the same time, long-term freight traffic growth is restricted by a number of internal and external factors. The question is: What can be done to fully realise the existing trans-Eurasian transit potential? Removal of non-tariff and technical barriers is one of the key target areas. Restrictions discussed in this report include infrastructural (transport and logistical infrastructure), border/customs-related, and administrative/legal restrictions. The findings of a survey conducted among European consignors is a valuable source of information on these subjects. The authors present their recommendations regarding what can be done to remove the barriers that hamper international freight traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis. -
Investor's Atlas 2006
INVESTOR’S ATLAS 2006 Investor’s ATLAS Contents Akmola Region ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Aktobe Region .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Almaty Region ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 Atyrau Region .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Eastern Kazakhstan Region............................................................................................................................................. 20 Karaganda Region ........................................................................................................................................................ 24 Kostanai Region ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 Kyzylorda Region .......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Mangistau Region ........................................................................................................................................................ -
Evaluation of Rail-Based Multimodal Transportation of Biofuels
Evaluation of Rail-based Multimodal Transportation of Biofuels Behzad Kordnejad a, Sebastiaan Meijer a a Department of Transport Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology SE-10044, Teknikringen 72, Stockholm, Sweden E-mail: [email protected], Phone: +46 (0) 8 790 88 17 Abstract This paper aims to analyse the internal and external factors influencing rail-based multimodal transportation of wood biofuel i.e. wood raw materials e.g. chips and branches that are used for production of energy. The analysis is conducted for the Swedish market and by using a bi-sectional qualitative framework. First, a STEEP analysis is conducted in order to analyse the external factors affecting railway transportation of biofuel. STEEP is an acronym for: Social, Technological, Economical, Environmental and Political and it is used as a strategic tool to analyse external factors that influence a business. Second, the internal factors are evaluated through the three main dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic and social. In essence, it is the factors affecting rail transportation of biofuel and the inherent capability of the rail mode that are addressed. Albeit the two methods are to their nature qualitative approaches, the evaluation is complemented by quantitative analysis of the niche market as well as a case study. A main conclusion from the qualitative analysis is that rail transportation of biofuel faces a number challenges that in many cases are related to a relatively high share of fixed costs and operational inflexibility. The main drivers for it are commonly associated with economies of scale and the relatively low environmental impact. Estimates from the case study show that the break-even distance i.e. -
Sessions at a Glance
SESSIONS AT A GLANCE MONDAY 12 TUESDAY 13 WEDNESDAY 14 THURSDAY 15 11:15 - 14:00 - 15:30 - 17:00 - 08:15 - 09:45 - 11:15 - 14:00 - 15:30 - 17:00 - 08:15 - 09:45 - 11:15 - 08:15 - 09:45 - ROOM 12:30 15:15 16:45 18:15 9:30 11:00 12:30 15:15 16:45 18:15 9:30 11:00 12:30 9:30 11:00 AVII A1.1 A1.2 A1.3 A1.4 A1.5 A1.6 A1.7 A1.8 A1.9 A1.10 A1.11 A1.12 A1.13 A1.14 A1.15 AVIII D3.1 D3.2 D3.3 D3.4 D3.5 D3.6 D3.7 D3.8 D3.9 D3.10 D3.11 D3.12 D3.13 D3.14 D3.15 AII C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 C2.5 C2.6 C2.7 C2.8 C2.9 C2.10 C2.11 C2.12 C2.13 C2.14 C2.15 AVI C4.1 C4.2 C4.3 C4.4 C4.5 C4.6 C4.7 C4.8 C4.9 C4.10 C4.11 C4.12 C4.13 D3.16 D3.17 5A A2.1 A2.2 A2.3 A2.4 A2.5 A2.6 A2.7 A2.8 A2.9 A2.10 A2.11 5B A4.1 A4.2 A4.3 A4.4 A4.5 A4.6 A4.7 A4.8 A4.9 A4.10 5C B5.1 B5.2 B5.3 B5.4 D1.1 D1.2 D1.3 D1.4 D1.5 D1.6 D1.7 D1.8 D1.9 D1.10 AIII C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4 C1.5 G4.1 G4.2 G4.3 G4.4 G4.5 G4.6 G4.7 G4.8 G4.9 G4.10 AIV B2.1 B2.2 B2.3 B2.4 B2.5 B2.6 B2.7 B2.8 B2.9 D2.1 D2.2 D2.3 D2.4 D2.5 D2.6 1.08 F1.1 F1.2 F1.3 F1.4 F1.5 F1.6 F1.7 F1.8 H2.1 H2.2 H2.3 H2.4 H2.5 H2.6 H2.7 1.13 F4.1 F4.2 F4.3 F4.4 F4.5 F4.6 F4.7 F4.8 G2.1 G2.2 G2.3 G2.4 G2.5 G2.6 0.07 B3.1 B3.2 B3.3 B3.4 B3.5 B3.6 B1.1 B1.2 B1.3+B5.5 G1.1 G1.2 G1.3 G1.4 G1.5 1.02 B4.1 B4.2 B4.3 B4.4 B4.5 B4.6 C6.1 C6.2 C6.3 G5.1 G5.2 G5.3 G5.4 G5.5 1.03 C5.1 C5.2 C5.3 C5.4 C5.5 C5.6 A3.1 A3.2 A3.3 A3.4 G3.1 G3.2 G3.3 G3.4 1.04 E3.1 E3.2 E3.3 E3.4 E3.5 E3.6 D4.1 D4.2 D4.3 D4.4 D5.1 D5.2 D5.3 1.05 F3.1 F3.2 F3.3 F3.4 F3.5 F3.6 E1.1 E1.2 E1.3 G6.1 G6.2 G6.3 1.06 F6.1 F6.2 F6.3 F6.4 F6.5 F6.6 E6.1 E6.2 E6.3 G7.1 G7.2 G7.3 1.07 -
Center West Regional Development Corridor
INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATA SHEET CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: ISDSC12150 Public Disclosure Authorized Date ISDS Prepared/Updated: 06-Apr-2015 Date ISDS Approved/Disclosed: 08-Apr-2015 I. BASIC INFORMATION A. Basic Project Data Country: Kazakhstan Project ID: P153497 Project Name: Center West Regional Development Corridor (P153497) Task Team Jacques Bure Leader(s): Estimated 18-Sep-2015 Estimated 28-Jan-2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Appraisal Date: Board Date: Managing Unit: GTIDR Lending Investment Project Financing Instrument: Sector(s): Rural and Inter-Urban Roads and Highways (100%) Theme(s): Infrastructure services for private sector development (25%), Rural services and infrastructure (25%), Export development and competitiveness (25%), Regional integration (25%) Financing (In USD Million) Total Project Cost: 1320.00 Total Bank Financing: 1000.00 Financing Gap: 100.00 Public Disclosure Authorized Financing Source Amount Borrower 220.00 0 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 1000.00 Total 1220.00 Environmental A - Full Assessment Category: Is this a No Repeater project? B. Project Objectives 22. The Project Development Objective is to increase transport connectivity and efficiency within Public Disclosure Authorized the regions along the Center-West corridor and to stimulate provision of access to basic services in less developed, remote, and sparsely populated regions. C. Project Description 1. The proposed Centre-West road project is part of transit corridor "Baku-Astrakhan-Atyrau- Aktobe-Aktau-Turkmenistan border", which connects Kazakhstan with Azerbaijan and Europe in the west, with Russia in the north, through Iran with countries of the Persian Gulf, and Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan in the south. Estimated 2,000 km Center-West project will start in Astana and pass through Akmola, Kostanai, Aktobe, Atyrau, and Mangistau oblasts, thus linking two of four identified "urban agglomerations", and two of the identified "second-tier" towns. -
Reconstruction Project
Social Monitoring Report Project Number: 52286-001 Semestral Report (January–June 2021) August 2021 Kazakhstan: CAREC Corridors 1 and 6 Connector Road (Aktobe–Kandyagash) Reconstruction Project Prepared by an individual consultant for the NC "KazAvtoZhol" JSC and the Asian Development Bank. This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status or any territory or area. 1st SEMI-ANNUAL SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS REPORT Internal monitoring Loan: 3829-KAZ CAREC Corridors 1 and 6 Connector Road (Aktobe–Kandyagash) Reconstruction Project Section km 11–52 Section km 52–100 Prepared by: Individual consultant on Social and Environmental Safeguards (Contract ICS-04) For: - NC “KazAvtoZhol” JSC - Asian Development Bank Report period: January–June 2021 Social Safeguards Monitoring Report. Loan: 3829-KAZ CAREC Corridors 1 and 6 Connector Road (Aktobe-Kandyagash) Reconstruction Project. 1st semi-annual report, January–June 2021 Social Safeguards Internal Monitoring Report Employer: Committee for Roads, Ministry of Industry and Infrastructural Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan Financed by: Asian Development Bank Loan: 3829-KAZ Document control Preparation, correction and approval Name and Position Date Signature Prepared By: O. Chubutkina, Individual Consultant 29 July 2021 on Social and Environmental Safeguards Approved by: Omirbaev N., Project Manager Approved by: N. -
PT. Kereta Api Indonesia and Statens Järnvägar (SJ) AB, Sweden
ANALYSIS OF TRAIN PASSENGER RESPONSES ON PROVIDED SERVICE Case study: PT. Kereta Api Indonesia and Statens Järnvägar (SJ) AB, Sweden ABADI DWI SAPUTRA Supervisor: Lars Haglund Service Science Program Karlstad University Spring 2010 ABSTRACT Railway is one of public transport mode on land transportation. Railways, as mass public transport modes, have unique characteristics. It has large capacity, high safety level, and free from traffic jam. Those characteristics make railway a primary public transportation. In fact, even railway transportation has a lot of benefits for society life but they still faced by the problem. Service quality level of Railways transportation is still low compared with other transportation modes. At present railways operation is still colored with the delay, limited condition vehicle, and unclear train travel information that often disadvantage passengers, and many other services offered fail to attract passengers. These conditions result in decreasing the quality of services and insufficient railways operation. The objective of this research is to analyze the relationship between customer satisfaction towards provided service with the desire to do a complaint and to find the factor from service quality that has significant influences to customer satisfaction towards PT KAI services. From that data, and also comparison study between PT Kereta Api Indonesia and Statens Järnvägar (SJ) AB, Sweden, we can recommend the service standards design, service guarantee and complaint handling system that need to be adjusted -
Political Persecutions in Connection to the Peaceful Protest of 27 March 2021
Political persecutions in connection to the peaceful protest of 27 March 2021 Date: 2 April 2021 Information gathered by: “Freedom Kazakhstan” Human Rights Protection Fund, “Qaharman” Human Rights Protection Fund, “405” Human Rights Movement, “Veritas” Human Rights Movement, “Elimay” Human Rights Movement, “Femina Virtute” Human Rights Movement, “Article 14” Human Rights Movement”, “Bostandyq” Human Rights Initiative”, “Open Dialogue” Human Rights Foundation. 1. Preventive political persecutions before peaceful protests of 28 March 2021 In the period from 22 March to 26 March 2021, we have recorded 30 cases in 11 cities and towns. Of these: - 2 political criminal cases: Orynbai Okhasov (Uralsk), Roman Reikhert (Aktobe region); - 2 administrative cases (Zhambyl Kobeisinov - 10 days of arrest; the case of Roman Reikhert is still pending); - 27 cases of other forms of persecution (including but not limited to interrogations, surveillance). Please note: 1 case = 1 person (1 person may have multiple episodes of political persecutions in connection to an event, i.e. in this case - the protest of 27 March 2021). 2. Political persecutions on the occasion of peaceful protests of 27 March 2021 We have recorded 129 cases of political persecution in 21 cities, towns and villages. Of these: - 1 political criminal case against civil activist: Kalasov Askar (Aktobe)(2 months in under house arrest for the duration of investigation). - 75 arbitrary detentions. - 2 administrative arrests (5-10 days). - 1 administrative fine (146$). 1 Preventive political persecutions before peaceful protests of 27 March 2021 Surname and name City Date Details Criminal cases 1. Okhasov Orynbai Uralsk 26 March 2021 405 part 2 (“participation in an extremist organisation”) for participation in the sanctioned protest in Uralsk on 28 February 2021. -
Public Expenditure on Railways in Europe: a Cross-Country Comparison
Public Expenditure on Railways in Europe: a cross-country comparison Ugo Arrigo - Giacomo Di Foggia Ugo Arrigo: Professor of Public Finance, University of Milano-Bicocca Giacomo Di Foggia: Adj. Prof. of Economics, University of Milano-Bicocca 1 Sommario 1. Introduction and main results ...................................................................................................... 3 2. Types of public subsidies to the rail transport sector ..................................................................... 5 3. Public subsidies to the rail transport sector in Italy ...................................................................... 7 4. Public subsidies to the rail transport sector in Great Britain ....................................................... 11 5. Public subsidies to the rail transport sector in Germany ............................................................. 16 6. Public subsidies to the rail transport sector in France ................................................................. 21 7. Public subsidies to the rail transport sector in Sweden ................................................................ 25 8. A comparison of public subsidies granted in the five countries.................................................... 28 9. The formation of the Italian public debt ..................................................................................... 34 References ......................................................................................................................................... -
Reconstruction Project (Section Km 330-504), the 1St Semi-Annual 2020
Social Monitoring Report Project Number: 48424-002 July 2020 KAZ: CAREC Corridors 1 and 6 Connector Road (Aktobe–Makat) Improvement Road Prepared by the Dongsung Engineering Co., Ltd in association with subconsultant Zhol-Sapa LLP for the Ministry of Investments and Development, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Asian Development Bank. This bi-annual social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status or any territory or area. Internal Social Safeguard Monitoring Report CAREC Corridors 1 & 6 Connector Road (Aktobe- Makat) Reconstruction Project (section km 330-504), the 1st semi-annual 2020 Internal Social Safeguard Monitoring Report Loan No. 3416-KAZ Reporting period: January-June 2020 REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN: CAREC Corridors 1 & 6 Connector Road (Aktobe–Makat) Reconstruction Project (Section km 330–504) Funded by the Asian Development Bank Prepared by the Construction Supervision Consultant DONGSUNG ENGINEERING Co., LTD / “ZS ENGINEERING” LLP Seoul, Korea / Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan For the Committee for Roads, Ministry of Industry and Infrastructural Development, Republic of Kazakhstan Approved by PMC “NC “KazAutoZhol” JSC – Zeinullina A.A. (PMC specialist’s name) and signature, report submission date 1 Internal Social Safeguard Monitoring Report CAREC Corridors 1 & 6 Connector Road (Aktobe- Makat) Reconstruction Project (section km 330-504), the 1st semi-annual 2020 Internal Social Safeguard Monitoring Report Employer: Committee for Roads, Ministry of Industry and Infrastructural Development, Republic of Kazakhstan Funded by: Asian Development Bank Loan No.