DOCSLIB.ORG

Terry J. Vandewalle Senior Biologist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terry J. Vandewalle Senior Biologist PLEASANT RIDGE EXHIBIT 102 Terry J. VanDeWalle Senior Biologist Mr. VanDeWalle is a Senior Biologist with over 25 years of experience specializing in animal and natural areas surveys, herpetology, threatened and endangered species surveys, ESA Section 7 and Section 10 consultation, wetland delineation and permitting, wetland mitigation design and monitoring, and coordination of environmental impact statements and assessments. Terry specializes in herpetology and is a recognized expert in the Midwest and has authored and co-authored peer-reviewed papers and regional herpetological guides. In addition, he has been involved with wildlife rehabilitation in the Midwest for over 20 years and currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Iowa Wildlife Center and is an Adjunct Professor at Hawkeye Community College where he teaches a course on Wildlife Ecology. At Stantec, he is responsible for managing Stantec’s Independence, Iowa office and designing and managing natural resource studies in support of regulatory compliance and permitting for clients in the energy, transportation, governmental and private sectors. EDUCATION Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation, MA, Biology, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, Federal Highway Administration, Ames, Iowa, 2008 1993 Butler's Garter Snake Training, Wisconsin BS, Animal Ecology, Iowa State University, Ames, Department of Natural Resources, Milwaukee, Iowa, 1986 Wisconsin, 2007 AA, Fisheries & Wildlife Biology, Kirkwood MEMBERSHIPS Community College, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 1984 Member, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Wetland Delineation Training, Environmental Technology Center, Chicago, Illinois, 1997 Member Representative, Society of American Military Engineers, Rock Island Post Wetland Construction and Restoration, Wetland Training Institute, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998 Member, Iowa Ornithologists' Union NEPA Practitioners Conference, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, Iowa, 2004 Fellow, Iowa Academy of Science Wetland Plant Identification (Spring) - Robert PROJECT EXPERIENCE Mohlenbrock Instructor, Iowa Department of Wind Energy Transportation, Ames, Iowa, 2000 WEBAT Bat Data Analysis, Various Locations Project manager. Coordinated the analysis and provided technical review and QA/QC for an analysis of correlations Wetland Plant Identification (Fall) - Robert between bat activity and temperature from 25 site-years of Mohlenbrock Instructor, Iowa Department of bat acoustic data collected at various sites across the eastern Transportation, Ames, Iowa, 2001 U.S. to determine temperature thresholds for activity. Basic Processes in Hydric Soils, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2000 USDA Hydric Soils for Wetland Delineation, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ames, Iowa, 2001 * denotes projects completed with other firms Design with community in mind Terry J. VanDeWalle Senior Biologist Iowa Ridgeport Wind Farm, Boone County, Iowa Adams Wind Farm, Adams County, Iowa Project manager. Conducted a wetland delineation, Project manager. Conducted a pre-construction acoustic bat threatened and endangered species screening, hazardous survey, avian use survey, raptor nest search, eagle use materials screening, and pre-construction acoustic bat survey surveys, and threatened and endangered species habitat using Anabat detectors at the site of a 120 MW wind farm. assessment at the proposed wind farm, analyzed acoustic and Wetlands were delineated using both the Food Securities Act avian data, analyzed eagle use data following guidelines set and 1987 COE Manual methods. Mapped wetlands using a forth in the USFWS Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance and the GPS system and wrote reports describing findings. Pre- USFWS 2013 predictive model, wrote reports describing construction bat surveys utilized ANABAT equipment. results of the surveys. Salt Creek Wind Farm, Tama County, Iowa Prairie Wind Farm, Mahaska County, Iowa Project manager. Conducted a pre-construction acoustic bat Project manager. Conducted a pre-construction acoustic bat survey using full-spectrum detectors, avian use survey, and survey, avian use survey, raptor nest search, eagle use threatened and endangered species habitat assessment at the surveys, and threatened and endangered species habitat proposed wind farm, analyzed acoustic and avian data, wrote assessment at the proposed wind farm, analyzed acoustic and reports describing results of the surveys. avian data, analyzed eagle use data following guidelines set forth in the USFWS Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance and the EcoVista Wind Farm, Howard and Mitchell USFWS 2013 predictive model, wrote reports describing Counties, Iowa results of the surveys. Analyzed acoustic data collected using ANABAT detectors during pre-construction bat surveys at the proposed wind Independence Wind Farm, Buchanan and farm. Delaware Counties, Iowa Project manager. Conducted a pre-construction acoustic bat Scranton Wind Farm, Greene County, Iowa survey, avian use survey, raptor nest search, eagle use Project manager. Collected pre-construction acoustic bat data surveys, and threatened and endangered species habitat using Anabat detectors within the project area and a single assessment at the proposed wind farm, analyzed acoustic and season (fall) of bat activity data at a reference site along the avian data, analyzed eagle use data following guidelines set North Raccoon River near the proposed project area. forth in the USFWS Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance and the Conducted a raptor nest search within the project area and a USFWS 2013 predictive model, wrote reports describing 10-mile buffer, eagle use surveys, and threatened and results of the surveys. endangered species habitat assessment at the proposed wind farm, analyzed acoustic data, analyzed eagle use data Ida Grove Wind Farm, Ida County, Iowa following guidelines set forth in the USFWS Eagle Project manager. Prepared a Site Characterization Report Conservation Plan Guidance and the USFWS 2013 predictive including a desktop avian, bat, and threatened and model, wrote reports describing results of the surveys. endangered species screening analysis. Conducted a desktop wetland determination and field review. Highland Wind Farm, O’Brien County, Iowa Buffalo Creek Wind Farm, Franklin County, Iowa Project manager. Conducted a wetland delineation, threatened and endangered species screening, pre- Project manager. Conducted a wetland delineation and construction acoustic bat survey using Anabat detectors, habitat assessments for three state-listed species at the site of avian point count survey, eagle use survey, and raptor nest a proposed 13,000 acre, 210 MW wind farm. Wetlands were search. Prepared reports describing results of the surveys. delineated using both the Food Securities Act and 1987 COE Manual methods. Mapped wetlands using a GPS system and wrote report describing findings. Conducted a separate Yellow Springs Wind Farm, Louisa County, Iowa avian/bat screening analysis to determine potential risk of Project manager. Oversaw and provided technical review and avian/bat mortality as a result of the project. Prepared QA/QC of an analysis of eagle use data using methods set separate habitat evaluation and avian/bat risk screening forth in the USFWS Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance and the analysis reports. USFWS 2013 predictive model. * denotes projects completed with other firms Terry J. VanDeWalle Senior Biologist Illinois Big Sky Wind Farm, Lee and Bureau Counties, Illinois Pioneer Trail Wind Farm, Iroquois and Ford Counties, Project manager. The project included consultation with the Illinois Illinois DNR and preparation of a conservation plan for the Project manager. Conducted pre-construction acoustic bat state-listed Blanding’s turtle, Illinois mud turtle, western surveys using Anabat detectors at the proposed 150 MW wind hognose snake and regal fritillary butterfly as part of an farm, analyzed acoustic data, wrote report describing results application for an incidental take authorization. The plan of the survey. Prepared and Avian and Bat Protection Plan included a description of the proposed wind farm project, an for the project. assessment of the impacts to the target species and measures to minimize and/or mitigate impacts. In addition, a public Prepared a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) in support of an notice for the project was prepared for publication in local and ESA Section 10 Incidental Take Permit application for the statewide newspapers. Wetland delineation and threatened endangered Indiana bat and proposed endangered northern and endangered species surveys for a 13,000 acre wind farm long-eared bat, including calculating an estimate of take, and 15-mile transmission line corridor. Delineated wetlands impacts of minimization measures, and utilization of the using a GPS system and prepared two separate reports Resource Equivalency Analysis (REA) model for impact of describing findings. Coordinated with USACE on permitting. take and mitigation calculations. Assisted owner with development of mitigation options and consultation with the Ford Ridge Wind Farm, Ford County, Illinois USFWS. Project manager. Conducted an acoustic presence-absence survey for the northern long-eared bat using full spectrum detectors at the site of the proposed wind farm, analyzed data, Hoopeston Wind Farm, Vermillion County, Illinois and prepared a technical memorandum describing the results Project manager. Conducted a fall migration acoustic bat of the survey. survey using full spectrum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File
    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statement 2013 of Enel Green Power S.P.A
    Annual Report 2013 Annual Report2013 Annual Report 2013 Contents Report on operations Consolidated financial statements Enel Green Power | 6 Consolidated Income Statement | 110 The Group structure | 7 Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income | 111 Enel Green Power in the world | 8 Consolidated Balance Sheet | 112 Corporate boards and Powers | 10 Statement of Changes in Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity | 113 Letter to the shareholders and other stakeholders | 12 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | 114 Summary of results | 16 Notes to the financial statements | 115 Significant events in 2013 | 25 Reference scenario | 33 Economic and energy conditions in 2013 | 35 Corporate governance | 187 Electricity markets | 39 How we operate | 57 Overview of the Group’s performance and financial position | 73 Declaration of the Chief Executive Officer and the Performance and financial position by segment | 90 officer responsible for the preparation of corporate > Italy and Europe | 91 financial reports | 188 > Iberia and Latin America | 95 > North America | 98 Main risks and uncertainties | 101 Annexes Outlook | 102 Regulations governing non-EU subsidiaries | 103 Subsidiaries, associates and other significant equity investments of the Enel Green Power Group at December 31, 2013 | 192 Regulations governing subsidiaries subject to the management and coordination of other companies | 104 Related parties | 105 Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity and net income of Enel Green Reports Power SpA and the corresponding consolidated figures | 107 Report of the Independent Auditors | 210 3 Report on operations Enel Green Power Enel Green Power, founded in December 2008, is the Enel Group company entirely devoted to the development and management of the Group’s renewables generation operations around the world, with a presence in Europe and the Americas.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Energy Jobs in Texas
    Advanced Energy Jobs In Texas Prepared by BW Research Partnership May 2016 Table of Contents What is Advanced Energy? ............................1 About .............................................................2 Highlights .......................................................3 Introduction ....................................................5 Methodology ..................................................7 Industry Overview ............................................. 9 Segment-by-Segment Results .......................13 Energy Efficiency ......................................................... 13 Advanced Electricity Generation ................................ 15 Advanced Fuels .......................................................... 17 Advanced Transportation ........................................... 18 Advanced Grid ............................................................ 19 Market Compostition ...................................21 Value Chain ................................................................. 21 Energy Workfoce ........................................................ 21 Firm Size ..................................................................... 23 Employer Hiring Experience ....................................... 23 Customers and Vendors ...............................25 Revenue Streams ..........................................26 What is Advanced Energy? Advanced energy is a broad range of technologies, els, and nuclear power plants are all examples of products, and services that constitute the
    [Show full text]
  • N149/5.X # 3–C40
    PRODUCED BY RECHARGE OFFICIAL SHOW DAILY DAY THREE Vestas, SGRE and GE lose out to Siemens Gamesa launches 5.8MW local players in 6GW China tender wind turbines YUKI YU BERND RADOWITZ he big three Western turbine Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy OEMs — Vestas, Siemens (SGRE) has unveiled two 5.8MW TGamesa Renewable Energy turbines — part of a new 5.X (SGRE) and GE — were left empty- platform that it says could conquer handed after bidding for a share of the a 30-35% share or new orders in world’s largest wind project, the 6GW coming years. Ulanqab facility in Inner Mongolia, “Today we are celebrating our China. second anniversary. I cannot The gigawatts on offer at state imagine a better way to do it than power giant SPIC’s tender — in by announcing the launch of this which 14 turbine makers took part new platform — tangible proof of — were split between five Chinese A wind farm in Siemens Gamesa’s commitment to Inner Mongolia, OEMs. Shanghai Electric came out China, where the innovation and R&D,” said chief on top, securing 1.4GW, Goldwind 6GW Ulanqab executive Markus Tacke at he project will be and Ming Yang each took 1.3GW, built product launch at the WindEurope while Dongfang Electric and CSIC show yesterday. Haizhuang picked up 1.1GW and There will be two 5.8MW models 900MW, respectively. said was a significant signal of new pressure on the developer, SPIC. The available, the SG 5.8-170 with a The Ulanqab tender — one of the openness to foreign manufacturers in three Western OEMs were among CONTINUED on Page 3 Getty | first held in China on a competitive, the Chinese wind sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Background on FERC Docket No. NP19-4-000
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION NERC Full Notice of Penalty regarding ) [Redacted in Public Version of NOP] ) Docket No. NP19‐4‐000 ) MOTION TO INTERVENE Submitted to FERC on February 21, 2019 Michael Mabee, a private citizen, requests the Commission’s leave to intervene in the above captioned docket, pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 39.7(e)(4). I request that 1) the Commission review this Notice of Penalty (NOP) to ensure that it is in the public interest, and 2) that the name of the entities(s), the unredacted Notice of Penalty and the unredacted settlement agreement be released in the public docket. NERC has made redactions to the publicly available documents, alleging the identities and other identifying information about Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standards violators must be kept from the public. The lack of transparency in this Notice of Penalty raise significant public interest concerns. Background on FERC Docket No. NP19‐4‐000 On January 25, 2019, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) filed a Notice of Penalty with FERC that disclosed 127 cybersecurity standard violations by unidentified “Companies.”1 NERC and its Regional Entities (RE) determined: [T]he 127 violations collectively posed a serious risk to the security and reliability of the BPS (Bulk Power System). The Companies’ violations of the CIP Reliability Standards posed a higher risk to the reliability of the BPS because many of the violations involved long durations, multiple instances of noncompliance,
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549
    Michael Mabee (516) 808‐0883 [email protected] www.MichaelMabee.info October 26, 2019 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549 Subject: Failure of investor owned electric utilities to disclose cybersecurity risk. Dear Commissioners: I am a citizen who conducts public interest research on the security of the electric grid. I have conducted several recent studies which raise significant regulatory red flags, not the least of which is a massive cybersecurity risk coverup in the electric utility industry. I believe that cybersecurity risk is not being disclosed to shareholders (as well as ratepayers, Congress and state regulators). The purveyors of this coverup are the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) aided and abetted by the entire electric utility industry, which consists of many publicly traded companies. Exhibit A is a list of most of the “Investor Owned Utilities” from the industry group Edison Electric Institute’s member list.1 Exhibit B is a list of the NERC Regulated Entities downloaded on October 26, 2019 from NERC’s website.2 This list includes both investor owned and publicly owned utilities. As detailed in the attached report of my research (Exhibit C), which I filed with FERC on October 25, 2019, I have been conducting an investigation since March of 2018 into NERC’s practice of withholding the identities of Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standards violators from the public. CIP standards include the standards for cybersecurity as well as physical security of critical facilities. This investigation has revealed that from July of 2010 through September of 2019 there had been 256 FERC dockets involving almost 1,500 “Unidentified Registered Entities.”3 In each of these instances, the identity of the regulatory violator was withheld from 1 See: https://www.eei.org/about/members/uselectriccompanies/Pages/default.aspx (accessed October 26, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Withouth CA Wind Farms with 15 and 20M Agl Wind Speeds (Updated 8.26.20)
    Wind Farms in the United States (excluding California) and Wind Speeds at known locations Data collected from thewindpower.net and UL's Windnavigator and compiled by Wind Harvest Classification: Public Update: 26 August Contact: Kelsey Wolf-Cloud, [email protected] 1. Wind speeds will vary across wind farms. This initial estimate Note used only one lat-long per wind farm. 2. This table has an unknown accuracy level. Total Onshore Total Wind Wind Total Number of Farms in Farms Projected Projected onshore wind farms Country analyzed MW >6.5m/s MW >6.5m/s in country (MWs) (MW) at 15m agl at 20m agl 1,292 104,212 54,627 11,181 22,059 Average Wind Speed Average Average at 20m agl Onshore Wind Farm # of Wind Speed Wind Speed Power (kW) m/s Name Turbines at 80m agl at 15m agl (calculated m/s m/s using wind shear) Foote Creek Rim 82,950 130 12.19 10.93 11.15 Kaheawa II 21,000 14 10.08 8.31 8.58 Rock River 50,000 50 9.7 7.98 8.26 Kaheawa I 30,000 20 9.8 7.97 8.25 Caprock Wind Ranch 80,000 80 9.91 7.7 8.04 Wild Horse 228,600 127 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse 268,200 149 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse II 39,600 22 8.9 7.42 7.66 Pioneer 85,100 46 8.89 7.36 7.60 High Plains 99,000 66 9.07 7.35 7.63 Red Canyon 84,000 56 9.47 7.34 7.66 Auwahi Wind Farm 24,000 8 9.68 7.27 7.63 Blue Canyon II 151,200 84 9.1 7.23 7.53 Blue Canyon 74,250 45 9.04 7.11 7.40 Seven Mile Hill 118,500 79 9.19 7.06 7.39 Glenrock II 99,000 66 9.08 7.05 7.36 McFadden Ridge 28,500 19 8.67 7.05 7.30 High Lonesome 100,000 40 8.36 7 7.20 Hawai Renewable 10,560 16 9.01 6.91 7.24 Happy
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping It Safe
    THE EUROPEAN WIND INDUSTRY MAGAZINE April 2013 Volume 32/No 2 INTERVIEW FATIHFATIH BIROL BIR Keeping it safe IEA Chief Economist Also inside: Governments and uncertainty Careers - top ten profi les Meet EWEA’s new President and CEO A WORTHWHILE UP TO 31% HIGHER YIELD INVESTMENT: WITH GENERATION DELTA. More than 27 years of experience. 2,100 multi-MW turbines installed – mature technical solutions form a sound basis for the fourth generation of the Nordex multi-MW platform. With larger rotors and an increased rated output in each wind class, the N117/3000 and N100/3300 obtain an up to 31% higher yield rom IEC-2 and IEC-1 sites. Generation Delta. Proven technology at a new stage of evolution. Further information under: www.nordex-online.com/delta-generation | contents | THE EUROPEAN WIND INDUSTRY MAGAZINE April 2013 Volume 32/No2 letter from the editor 5 Changing times brussels briefi ng 7 interview 8 Fatih Birol, Chief Economist, International Energy Agency interview 11 Andrew Garrad, EWEA’s new president Q&A 15 Maritime spatial planning takes shape Global Wind Day 16 mini-focus 19 Wind energy sector faces uncertainty crisis fi nance interviews 22 Cord Landsmann, CFO, E.ON Climate & Renewables Wolfgang Bischoff, CEO, Siemens Financial Services feature 24 Careers in wind: ten “most wanted” profi les wind worker 26 Liesbet Mijlemans, Head of wind consultancy, 3E Alejandro Saladanja, Commissioning manager for offshore, Alstom renewable world 29 Tackling poverty through renewable energy in East Africa focus 30 Keeping it safe opinion - Junior Isles 41 Making ends meet keeping up with EWEA’s blog 42 opinion - Adam Barber 45 Health and safety protects the bottom line Country focus 46 A closer look at… Ireland technology corner 48 Offshore wind engineers to the rescue? Wind Directions is published four times a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Traditional Air
    LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, TRADITIONAL AIR POLLUTANTS, WATER DEPLETION, AND CUMULATIVE ENERGY DEMAND FROM 2- MW WIND TURBINES IN TEXAS BY ALI ALSALEH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Texas at Arlington January 2017 Arlington, Texas Supervising Committee: Melanie Sattler, Supervising Professor Liu Ping Srinivas Prabakar Mohsen Shahandashti 1. Abstract One renewable energy source that has witnessed a significant growth in the recent years is wind energy, with the installation of new wind farms around the globe as well as the innovations in wind power technology, which have increased the efficiency of this source. Wind power generates electrical energy from the wind’s kinetic energy without causing emissions or pollution from power production; however, environmental effects are caused by the wind turbine manufacturing, transport, and other phases. Therefore, the overall goal of this study was to analyze the environmental effects associated with wind energy technology by taking into consideration the entire life cycle for wind turbines. Specific objectives were: 1. To conduct a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) for large wind turbines in Texas, including: All phases (materials acquisition, manufacturing, transportation, installation, operation and maintenance, and end of life) and A variety of inventory emissions and resources (greenhouse gases; traditional air pollutants SO2, NOx, VOCs, CO and PM; water depletion; cumulative energy demand). 2. To identify a range of impacts due to uncertainty in LCA model inputs. 3. To compare impacts of wind power to literature values for coal and natural gas, as examples of fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013 Annual Report2013
    Annual Report 2013 Annual Report2013 Annual Report 2013 Contents Report on operations Consolidated financial statements Enel Green Power | 6 Consolidated Income Statement | 110 The Group structure | 7 Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income | 111 Enel Green Power in the world | 8 Consolidated Balance Sheet | 112 Corporate boards and Powers | 10 Statement of Changes in Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity | 113 Letter to the shareholders and other stakeholders | 12 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | 114 Summary of results | 16 Notes to the financial statements | 115 Significant events in 2013 | 25 Reference scenario | 33 Economic and energy conditions in 2013 | 35 Corporate governance | 187 Electricity markets | 39 How we operate | 57 Overview of the Group’s performance and financial position | 73 Declaration of the Chief Executive Officer and the Performance and financial position by segment | 90 officer responsible for the preparation of corporate > Italy and Europe | 91 financial reports | 188 > Iberia and Latin America | 95 > North America | 98 Main risks and uncertainties | 101 Annexes Outlook | 102 Regulations governing non-EU subsidiaries | 103 Subsidiaries, associates and other significant equity investments of the Enel Green Power Group at December 31, 2013 | 192 Regulations governing subsidiaries subject to the management and coordination of other companies | 104 Related parties | 105 Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity and net income of Enel Green Reports Power SpA and the corresponding consolidated figures | 107 Report of the Independent Auditors | 210 3 Report on operations Enel Green Power Enel Green Power, founded in December 2008, is the Enel Group company entirely devoted to the development and management of the Group’s renewables generation operations around the world, with a presence in Europe and the Americas.
    [Show full text]
  • Guia De Empresas Completa Maquetada.Pdf
    Design: estudio jorge gil Layout and printing: Impression Artes Gráfi cas Editing: Spanish Wind Energy Association (AEE) 2 Spanish wind energy industry. Proven effi ciency List of symbols Index of Companies A 8 Developer B 29 C 37 D 48 Wind Turbine Manufacturer E 55 F 89 Component Manufacturer G 98 H 119 I 121 Engineering and Civil Engineering J 145 K 149 Operation and Maintenance L 153 M 155 N 173 Consulting O 177 P 180 Finance and Insurance R 183 S 193 T 209 Transportation & Logistics U 224 V 228 Technology Centre W 232 Z 238 Training Other Spanish wind energy industry. Proven effi ciency 3 4 Spanish wind energy industry. Proven effi ciency IDAE I t is with pride that, based on the continuous efforts of our businesses, we say Furthermore, Spanish companies keep a clear strategic commitment to R & that the Spanish wind energy sector enjoys a leadership position and prestige D, boosting key industrial projects and initiatives for our industry to strengthen beyond our borders. This success is even more valuable because it is a highly its technology leadership status in the medium to long term in all wind energy dynamic sector with international competitiveness, for which it is essential to have subsectors, onshore, small wind and offshore. For instance, the high participation high quality products, new approaches and business strategies that give our com- of national technicians in a very large number of projects and the level of inves- panies differential value. tment in R & D in the renewable energies sector in recent years have allowed Spain to be one of the European Union countries with higher returns on research Our developers, having acquired foreign assets of popularity and expanded renewable programmes, in the context of the 7th Framework Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical University of Crete Geostatistical Analysis of Installed
    Technical University of Crete School of Mineral Resources Engineering Geostatistical Analysis of Installed Wind Power Production Data Author: Panagiota Gkafa Advisor: Prof. Dionissios Hristopoulos, Technical University of Crete Steering Committee Members: Prof. Michalis Galetakis, Technical University of Crete Prof. Nikolaos Thomaidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki June 6, 2020 I would like to dedicate to my lovely family! ii Acknowledgments Firstly, I would like to thank my advisor Prof. Dionissios Hristopoulos for showing confidence in me by assigning me this master's thesis. Also I would like to thank him for his patience, caring, motivation, and guidance. I would also like to thank the other two members of my thesis committee: Prof. Nikolaos Thomaidis, for sharing with me the data of the installed power production from the Netherlands, and his comments and his guidance, and Prof. Michail Galetakis for his comments and his guidance. I would also like to thank the members, and my friends in the Geostatistical Labo- ratory of the School of Mineral Resources Engineering at the Technical University of Crete, Ms. Vicky Agou, Ms. Michaela Vasiliadi, and Dr. Andreas Pavlides for their support and their friendship. I would especially like to thank Vicky and Andreas for many helpful conversations during my studies. I would like to express my gratitude to all my friends, for their support and encour- agement during all these years. Last but no least, I would like to thank my family. My father, my mother, and my brother have always been by my side all these years with their support, and their encouragement. iv Abstract In recent years, an increasing number of countries are attempting to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and enhance the contribution of renewable energy sources in their energy production plans.
    [Show full text]