DOCSLIB.ORG

January 2018 Satellite & Space Monthly Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 2018 Satellite & Space Monthly Review February 5, 2018 Industry Brief Chris Quilty [email protected] January 2018 +1 (727)-828-7085 Austin Moeller Satellite & Space Monthly Review [email protected] +1 (727)-828-7601 January 11, 2018: Air force to utilize more smallsats for weather DMSP F19 Readying for Launch observation. Citing growing budget constraints, the US Air Force announced that is considering using small satellites in combination with next-gen software rather than procuring traditional multibillion-dollar, cost-plus spacecraft to replace/replenish its Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP). Despite awarding a $94 million contract to Ball Aerospace in November to design the Weather System Follow-on Microwave (WSF-M) satellite, the Air Force plans to begin launching small satellites equipped with infrared imaging and electro-optical instruments to monitor battlefield weather starting in 2021-2022. The Air Force is also considering augmenting their current capabilities with inactive NOAA GOES satellites in the near-term. These considerations parallel recent comments by USSTRATCOM commander Gen. John Hyten, who has repeatedly stated that the Air Force currently spends too much time and money developing large, high- cost satellites, and needs to invest in more small satellites for strategic Source: Lockheed Martin and budgetary reasons. Conclusion: Smallsats ready for a DoD growth spurt? With growing evidence of Russian/Chinese anti- satellite technology demonstrations, the Pentagon is becoming increasingly reluctant to spend billions of dollars on monolithic “Battlestar Galactica” satellite systems that place too many eggs in one basket. While not as robust or technologically-capable as high-end spacecraft built by traditional contractor, such as Lockheed Martin, small satellites are orders-of-magnitude less expensive to build, launch, and maintain. And, for a Defense Department looking to bring cost savings and efficiency to its notoriously costly and labyrinthine procurement system, smallsts represent a legitimate opportunity to bend the cost curve. Early efforts to advance smallsat technology, such as the Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) office (formed in 2007) were consistently undermined by the Air Forces, which repeatedly tried to de-fund the office. More recently, however, the DoD has been expanding its smallsat efforts with programs such as the Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) and the Defense Innovation Unit Experimental (DIUx). Likewise, the industry has taken note of this trend, as evidenced by recent product development and M&A efforts, including: • Boeing’s launch of a dedicated Phantom Phoenix smallsat product line • SS/L’s contract to manufacture XX Skysat satellites for Skybox Imaging February 5, 2018 Industry Brief • General Atomic’s acquisition of smallsat manufacturer Miltec, along with the US assets of SSTL • Thales Alenia Space’s partnership with Sitael on the development of a 200 kg smallsat bus • Lockheed Martin’s investment in smallsat manufacturer Terran Orbital and announcement that it intends to spend $300 million to develop a new family of satellite buses • Harris’ recent win of a classified “pathfinder” smallsat program that is expected to ramp to >$100 million over next two years The expeditious pace of cubesat, nanosat, and other small satellite launches has accelerated noticeably in recent years and could see an enormous boost if the Pentagon shifts towards the adoption of swarms of smallsats to provide a more economical means of gathering communications, remote sensing, weather and intelligence data. Annual increase in nanosatellite launches (includes cubesats). Source: Nanosats.eu January 17, 2018: Effective Space signs its first satellite Artist’s Rendition of Effective Space’s “Space Drone extension contract. Adding further evidence that the nascent satellite servicing market is not a flash in the pan, Effective Space Systems (ESS) announced on January 17th that it had signed its first contract for satellite servicing operations using two of its Space Drone mission extension Moon Express MX-1 Lander vehicles. The $100 million contract, signed by an as-of-yet undisclosed customer, will have the company’s Space Drones dock with two currently on-orbit satellites, providing attitude control and station-keeping functionality to extend their operating life over a period of several years. The launch has been scheduled for 2020. ESS’ announcement is especially topical considering that Source: Effective Space Systtems Orbital-ATK, which is also developing its own GeoStar- Source: Moon Express. February 5, 2018 Industry Brief based Mission Extension Vehicle (MEV), announced on Artist’s Rendition of Orbital ATK’s MEV-1 January 4th that it had received a second order from its client, Intelsat, for a satellite servicing mission in mid-2020. Their first MEV launch is scheduled for early 2019. The quickly-emerging field of satellite servicing is also being targeted by Space Systems Loral (SS/L), which is developing its Robotic Servicing Vehicle (RESTORE-L) for NASA and Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites (RSGS) for DARPA. Restore-L, which is intended to refuel a LEO satellite, is scheduled to launch in 2020, while RSGS is currently on the docket for 2021. Likewise, in June 2017 SS/L signed a servicing contract with commercial operator Source: Orbital ATK. SES for a planned 2021 mission. Also on the horizon, Airbus announced in September 2017 that it is developing the “Airbus Space Tug” (possibly in collaboration with the Russian company RSS Energia) and Daytona Beach, Florida-based Weintraus is developing the Hercules servicing vehicle with a planned initial mission in 2022. Conclusion: Satellite servicing industry poised to flourish? With the official entry of Effective Space into the market, it appears that the establishment of the satellite servicing industry as a viable, burgeoning 2020s business model is now all but inevitable. Effective Space’s $100 million-dollar contract demonstrates that significant demand exists among industry-wide satellite operators for the prospect of squeezing extra years out of otherwise perfectly functional satellites. In the case of the Space Drone, a $50 million price tag to restore an existing spacecraft far outweighs the $250-500 million cost to construct and launch an entirely new satellite. But wait! Aren’t high throughput satellites (HTS) going to obsolete much of the current on-orbit capacity? In the long term, probably yes, but there are at least two uses cases where life extension services make imminent sense today: • Video services, which by-and-large are not impacted by HTS technology • Regional services, where the cost/complexity of upgrading to an HTS architecture cannot be justified based on current business/revenue model. Over the next 5-10 years, we may yet see the development of new and innovative LEO business models (ranging from asteroid mining to space tourism), but for the time being satellite servicing has emerged as the one service that has earned unmistakable buy-in from the established industry. As the next wave of satellite operators consider satellite servicing missions, we expect three major criteria to weigh on their source selection: • Overall mission cost • Capabilities provided by the servicing vehicle • Duration of life extension services February 5, 2018 Industry Brief Comparison of Leading Satellite Servicing Vehicles Manufacturer Effective Space Orbital ATK SSL Nomenclature SPACE DRONE MEV RSV Platform Custom GEOStar SSL-1300 Mass 400 kg 2041 kg ~ 5000+ kg Propulsion Electric Electric, chemical Electric, chemical Bus Power UNK 8 kW UNK Launch Secondary Secondary Primary Customers Undisclosed Intelsat DARPA, SES Spacecraft Life 15 years 15+ years 15+ years Hosted Payloads No Yes Yes Refueling No No Yes Station-keeping Yes Yes Yes Repair No No Yes Assembly/augmentation No No Yes Inspection/Imagery No Yes Yes NOAA License? No Yes UNK First Mission 2020 NET 2019 2021 (DARPA) Satellite Compatibility > 90% of total in orbit 80% of total in orbit 100% of total in orbit Source: Company reports and Quilty Analytics. Pricing: In the battle over cost, Effective Space has a clear advantage, with its Space Drone’s 400 kg launch mass and comparatively small size enabling flights of multiple vehicles on one rocket, as well as significant versatility in available launch vehicles to carry it. Effective Space has also touted their vehicle’s ability to fly as a secondary payload. Orbital’s MEV also takes economies of scale into account, with its instruments mounted on one side to allow it to be stacked within an Ariane 5 payload fairing with other GeoStar-3 satellites (how convenient). SS/L’s RSV, derived from an SSL-1300 bus, falls short in this category, with an estimated mass of at least 5,000 kg. Features: Capabilities of the servicing vehicles vary based on customer requirements, but the most in- demand services are refueling/station-keeping, inspection and repair, and orbital repositioning. While SS/L specifically provides satellite refueling, the MEV and Space Drone instead attach themselves to the satellites, using their own propulsion systems to maintain the satellite’s position by functioning as a “jetpack.” Inspection and repair: Currently, only SS/L’s RSVs have this capability, having developed advanced optics and dexterous robotic arms for their vehicles per DARPA and NASA mission requirements. Imaging systems generally require a NOAA license, which Effective Space has not obtained, though Orbital-ATK, through its subsidiary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APSCC Monthly E-Newsletter JANUARY 2017
    APSCC Monthly e-Newsletter JANUARY 2017 The Asia-Pacific Satellite Communications Council (APSCC) e-Newsletter is produced on a monthly basis as part of APSCC’s information services for members and professionals in the satellite industry. Subscribe to the APSCC monthly newsletter and be updated with the latest satellite industry news as well as APSCC activities! To renew your subscription, please visit www.apscc.or.kr/sub4_5.asp. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with a title “Unsubscribe.” News in this issue has been collected from 1 to 31 December 2016. INSIDE APSCC APSCC Session at PTC'17, What do End Users Actually Want? 16 January 2017, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, www.ptc.org/ptc17 While new technology is good, as are lower prices, are we actually meeting end user needs in the Pacific? Why/why not? What is being provisioned now and future? What gaps we must fill? Where does the satcom model fall short? The session, “What do End Users Actually Want?” would discuss end user needs across various applications and markets. Pierre-Jean Beylier, CEO, SpeedCast Richard Swardh, SVP, Comtech EF Data Imran Malik, RVP, O3b Networks Jacques-Samuel Prolon, General Manager, Kacific Broadband Satellites Moderated by Chris Baugh, President, NSR APSCC members can enjoy discounted rate when PTC’17 registration. Gregg Daffner Elected as APSCC President Gregg Daffner (CEO, GapSat) was elected and inaugurated as the President of APSCC at the 2016 APSCC General Assembly held on 13 December 2016. As the main representative of APSCC, Gregg will be responsible for setting the policies and goals of APSCC in consultation with the APSCC Board of Directors, Vice Presidents and Executive Director.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Energia (Arduino)
    Using Energia (Arduino) Introduction This chapter of the MSP430 workshop explores Energia, the Arduino port for the Texas Instruments Launchpad kits. After a quick definition and history of Arduino and Energia, we provide a quick introduction to Wiring – the language/library used by Arduino & Energia. Most of the learning comes from using the Launchpad board along with the Energia IDE to light LED’s, read switches and communicate with your PC via the serial connection. Learning Objectives, Requirements, Prereq’s Prerequisites & Objectives Prerequisites Basic knowledge of C language Basic understanding of using a C library and header files This chapter doesn’t explain clock, interrupt, and GPIO features in detail, this is left to the other chapters in the MSP430 workshop Requirements - Tools and Software Hardware Windows (XP, 7, 8) PC with available USB port MSP430F5529 Launchpad Software Already installed, if you Energia Download have installed CCSv5.x Launchpad drivers (Optional) MSP430ware / Driverlib Objectives Define ‘Arduino’ and describe what is was created for Define ‘Energia’ and explain what it is ‘forked’ from Install Energia, open and run included example sketches Use serial communication between the board & PC Add an external interrupt to an Energia sketch Modify CPU registers from an Energia sketch MSP430 Workshop - Using Energia (Arduino) 8 - 1 What is Arduino Chapter Topics Using Energia (Arduino) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Institute for Near East Policy August
    THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY n AUGUST 2020 n PN84 PHOTO CREDIT: REUTERS © 2020 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. FARZIN NADIMI n April 22, 2020, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force (IRGC-ASF) Olaunched its first-ever satellite, the Nour-1, into orbit. The launch, conducted from a desert platform near Shahrud, about 210 miles northeast of Tehran, employed Iran’s new Qased (“messenger”) space- launch vehicle (SLV). In broad terms, the launch showed the risks of lifting arms restrictions on Iran, a pursuit in which the Islamic Republic enjoys support from potential arms-trade partners Russia and China. Practically, lifting the embargo could facilitate Iran’s unhindered access to dual-use materials and other components used to produce small satellites with military or even terrorist applications. Beyond this, the IRGC’s emerging military space program proves its ambition to field larger solid-propellant missiles. Britain, France, and Germany—the EU-3 signatories of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the 2015 Iran nuclear deal is known—support upholding the arms embargo until 2023. The United States, which has withdrawn from the deal, started a process on August 20, 2020, that could lead to a snapback of all UN sanctions enacted since 2006.1 The IRGC’s Qased space-launch vehicle, shown at the Shahrud site The Qased-1, for its part, succeeded over its three in April. stages in placing the very small Nour-1 satellite in a near circular low earth orbit (LEO) of about 425 km. The first stage involved an off-the-shelf Shahab-3/ Ghadr liquid-fuel missile, although without the warhead section, produced by the Iranian Ministry of Defense.2 According to ASF commander Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Ross University School of Medicine Annual Disclosure
    Ross University School of Medicine 2020-2021 Annual Disclosure Student Right-to-Know and Campus Security (Clery Act) Annual Security Report Annual Fire Safety Report Sex and Gender Based Misconduct Response and Prevention Policy Alcohol & Substance Abuse Policy Student Rights under FERPA (The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) This document includes information for: Ross University School of Medicine, Barbados Campus, 2 mile Hill, St. Michael, Barbados December 15, 2020 The policies outlined in this document are current as of December 15, 2020. The most current versions of the policies are available online. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CAMPUS WATCH ............................................................................................ 4 REPORTING CRIMES AND EMERGENCIES ................................................ 4 ANNUAL SECURITY REPORT ....................................................................... 4 SIREN EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM ......................................................... 5 CAMPUS ACCESS, FACILITY SECURITY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ............................................................................................... 5 MISSING STUDENT POLICY .......................................................................... 6 MISSING STUDENT PROCEDURES .............................................................. 7 SAFETY AND SECURITY ............................................................................... 7 FIRE SAFETY ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Missile Challenge
    The Iranian Missile Challenge By Anthony H. Cordesman Working Draft: June 4, 2019 Please provide comments to [email protected] SHAIGAN/AFP/Getty Images The Iranian Missile Challenge Anthony H. Cordesman There is no doubt that Iran and North Korea present serious security challenges to the U.S. and its strategic partners, and that their missile forces already present a major threat within their respective regions. It is, however, important to put this challenge in context. Both nations have reason to see the U.S. and America's strategic partners as threats, and reasons that go far beyond any strategic ambitions. Iran is only half this story, but its missile developments show all too clearly why both countries lack the ability to modernize their air forces, which has made them extremely dependent on missiles for both deterrence and war fighting. They also show that the missile threat goes far beyond the delivery of nuclear weapons, and is already becoming far more lethal and effective at a regional level. This analysis examines Iran's view of the threat, the problems in military modernization that have led to its focus on missile forces, the limits to its air capabilities, the developments in its missile forces, and the war fighting capabilities provided by its current missile forces, its ability to develop conventionally armed precision-strike forces, and its options for deploying nuclear-armed missiles. IRAN'S PERCEPTIONS OF THE THREAT ...................................................................................................... 2 IRAN'S INFERIORITY IN ARMS IMPORTS ................................................................................................... 3 THE AIR BALANCE OVERWHELMINGLY FAVORS THE OTHER SIDES ........................................................... 4 IRAN (AND NORTH KOREA'S) DEPENDENCE ON MISSILES ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Sector in 2014 and Beyond
    The Space Economy at a Glance 2014 © OECD 2014 Chapter 1 The space sector in 2014 and beyond Chapter 1 reviews major trends in the space sector. It first provides a review of the “space economy” in 2014. It then focuses on an original analysis of global value chains in the space sector, including a spotlight on fifty years of European space co-operation. The chapter also looks at new dynamics in the sector, which may impact incumbents and new entrants, with a focus on innovation in industrial processes and the development of small satellites. 15 1. THE SPACE SECTOR IN 2014 AND BEYOND Defining the “space economy” in 2014 Straddling the defence and aerospace industries, the space sector has for decades been a relatively discrete sector, developed to serve strategic objectives in many OECD and non-OECD economies, with security applications, science and space exploration. The space sector, like many other high-tech sensitive domains, is now attracting much more attention around the world, as governments and private investors seek new sources of economic growth and innovation. The “space economy” has become an intriguing domain to examine, bringing interesting innovation capacities as well as new commercial opportunities. Over the past decade, the number of public and private actors involved in space activities worldwide has increased, spurring even further the development of the nascent space economy. Despite strong headwinds in many related sectors (e.g. defence), the space sector overall has not been significantly affected by the world economic crisis. It remains a strategic sector for many countries, relatively sheltered because of national imperatives (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry E. “Butch” Wilmore (Captain, U.S
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 January 2021 Barry E. “Butch” Wilmore (Captain, U.S. Navy) NASA Astronaut Summary: Barry E. Wilmore (Captain, U.S. Navy) is a veteran of two spaceflights and has accumulated a total of 178 days in space. He is currently training as Commander of the 1st flight of the Boeing Starliner spacecraft scheduled for launch in the fall of 2021. In September 2014, Wilmore launched aboard a Russian Soyuz rocket as a member of Expedition 41. He served as a Flight Engineer until November when he assumed command of the station upon arrival of the Expedition 42 crew. He returned to Earth in March 2015. During this mission, he logged 167 days in space and performed four spacewalks totaling 25 hours, 36 minutes. In 2009, Wilmore served as a pilot aboard Space Shuttle Atlantis for STS-129, traveling 4.5 million miles in 171 orbits. Wilmore is from Mt. Juliet, Tennessee and earned degrees from Tennessee Technological University and the University of Tennessee. He is a captain in the U.S. Navy. Personal Data: Wilmore is married to the former Miss Deanna Newport of Helenwood, Tennessee and they have two daughters. He was raised in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee where his parents Eugene and Faye Wilmore still reside. His brother Jack and family reside in Franklin, Tennessee. Education: Mount Juliet High School, Mount Juliet, Tennesee. Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Electrical Engineering, Tennessee Technological University. Master of Science in Aviation Systems, University of Tennessee. Experience: Wilmore has accumulated more than 8,000 flight hours and 663 carrier landings, all in tactical jet aircraft, and is a graduate of the United States Naval Test Pilot School (USNTPS).
    [Show full text]
  • The European Launchers Between Commerce and Geopolitics
    The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Report 56 March 2016 Marco Aliberti Matteo Tugnoli Short title: ESPI Report 56 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print), 2076-6688 (online) Published in March 2016 Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute, ESPI Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel. +43 1 7181118-0; Fax -99 Rights reserved – No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose with- out permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “Source: ESPI Report 56; March 2016. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, inciden- tal or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: Panthera.cc ESPI Report 56 2 March 2016 The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Access to Space at the Nexus of Commerce and Geopolitics 10 1.2 Objectives of the Report 12 1.3 Methodology and Structure 12 2. Access to Space in Europe 14 2.1 European Launchers: from Political Autonomy to Market Dominance 14 2.1.1 The Quest for European Independent Access to Space 14 2.1.3 European Launchers: the Current Family 16 2.1.3 The Working System: Launcher Strategy, Development and Exploitation 19 2.2 Preparing for the Future: the 2014 ESA Ministerial Council 22 2.2.1 The Path to the Ministerial 22 2.2.2 A Look at Europe’s Future Launchers and Infrastructure 26 2.2.3 A Revolution in Governance 30 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Status and Trends of Smallsats and Their Launch Vehicles
    Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management ISSN: 1984-9648 [email protected] Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço Brasil Wekerle, Timo; Bezerra Pessoa Filho, José; Vergueiro Loures da Costa, Luís Eduardo; Gonzaga Trabasso, Luís Status and Trends of Smallsats and Their Launch Vehicles — An Up-to-date Review Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, vol. 9, núm. 3, julio-septiembre, 2017, pp. 269-286 Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço São Paulo, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=309452133001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative doi: 10.5028/jatm.v9i3.853 Status and Trends of Smallsats and Their Launch Vehicles — An Up-to-date Review Timo Wekerle1, José Bezerra Pessoa Filho2, Luís Eduardo Vergueiro Loures da Costa1, Luís Gonzaga Trabasso1 ABSTRACT: This paper presents an analysis of the scenario of small satellites and its correspondent launch vehicles. The INTRODUCTION miniaturization of electronics, together with reliability and performance increase as well as reduction of cost, have During the past 30 years, electronic devices have experienced allowed the use of commercials-off-the-shelf in the space industry, fostering the Smallsat use. An analysis of the enormous advancements in terms of performance, reliability and launched Smallsats during the last 20 years is accomplished lower prices. In the mid-80s, a USD 36 million supercomputer and the main factors for the Smallsat (r)evolution, outlined.
    [Show full text]
  • Loral Space & Communications Inc
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 1-14180 LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC. (Exact name of registrant specified in its charter) Jurisdiction of incorporation: Delaware IRS identification number: 87-0748324 600 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10020 Telephone: (212) 697-1105 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered Common stock, $.01 par value LORL Nasdaq Global Select Market Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ◻ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ◻ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ◻ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]