DOCSLIB.ORG

BULGARIA by Anja Herzog

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BULGARIA by Anja Herzog Broadcasting and Citizens BULGARIA by Anja Herzog 1. TV VIEWERS’ PARTICIPATION IN BULGARIA After the breakdown of the communist system Bulgaria has developed a dual broadcasting system with the quasi state-ruled broadcasters Bulgarian National Television (BNT) and Bulgarian National Radio (BNR) and a multitude of private, commercial broadcasters. The media market is fragmented, with over 130 radio stations, 129 TV operators, and over 180 newspapers and magazines at present.1 Two TV channels have an almost nationwide reach: The public “Channel 1” of BNT has a technical penetration of 98.1 % and the private channel BTV of 86.4 %. These two channels have the biggest reach, in April 2003 the first national public channel, Kanal 1 (BNT), reached 77.6 % of the audience while the private channel BTV had a reach of 91.5 %.2 Due to rather unstable political and economic circumstances, the Bulgarian media landscape has been subject to a number of fluctuations during the transformation process from the Soviet kind of state monopoly to the dual broadcasting system as known in the Western world. Today, the dominating aim in Bulgaria is digitalisation of the media and the preparation for the acceptance into the European Union. Therefore, there currently is a vivid discussion about new media legislation because of the evident insufficiency of the existing legislation. This general insufficiency also holds for the specific aspect which is of interest in this report: Although there are some features of an accountability system, its actual accomplishments are questionable as there is rarely any direct consumer participation. For an overview on the relevant institutions dealing with viewers’ interests see the table at the end of the chapter. 1.1 National Institution and Government bodies The only way for television viewers in Bulgaria to participate directly is to file a complaint to the Council for Electronic Media (CEM – Savet za elektronni Medii). The CEM has been established by law to control the programmes of radio and television broadcasters, e.g. the requirements for broadcasts aimed at children, the compliance with the requirements relating to advertising etc. Among other activities it commissions audience surveys and publishes findings in a newsletter (see chapter 2.1). Beyond the functions of the CEM there is no representation of TV viewers in the boards of the broadcasters or in other committees or councils established by law. 1.2 Self-Regulation As a self-regulatory counterpart the Code of Ethics, set up in 1994 by the Union of Journalists in Bulgaria (together with e.g. the Free Speech Civic Forum and the Centre for Independent Journalism) needs to be mentioned. It reflects this intention by committing journalists in their work not to violate principles like human dignity or equality.3 However, the effects of this declaration of a Code of Ethics do not seem to be very high as the Council for Electronic Media focuses on the increase of professional standards of journalism in Bulgaria on different levels (see chapter 2.3). Another approach to support, amongst others, the interests of viewers, is the Bulgarian Media Coalition (BMC). It is an independent association of different organisations. Its task is to “work together for the development of independent media, for a pluralistic and independent media sphere”.4 37 Bulgaria 1.3 Other organisations An interesting small organisation which is worth being mentioned in the context of securing the interests of specific groups of viewers, is the association Media with Human Face. This association follows the aim as generally stated in its title in producing TV programmes for ethnic minorities, handicapped people etc. as well as programmes that provide citizens with a forum for discussion (see chapter 3). Beyond that, there are no specific viewer organisations in Bulgaria. As a reason for this experts5 refer to the special relationship between Bulgarians and their media and journalists. Actually, people very often complain directly to the journalists they think did something wrong. Another means are call-in programmes (e.g. Nova TV) that are used to complain about the media. Concerning the press, letters to the editor are still a widely used way of complaining. Typical subjects of these “direct” complaints are the contamination of language due to tabloidisation (e.g. new word creations) and the general style of coverage (the decline of political culture). The public calls for more and better feature films. In the past, the politicisation of the press was often criticised, this is no longer the case though. Overall, a discrepancy between city and country can be observed. This means that people in the cities are better informed, whereas in the country cultural values are still regarded as very important. But, partly as a consequence of the still ongoing process of transformation, there is no developed scene of civil society organisations which try to institutionalise the interests of particular groups. For example, as far as we found out up to now, there are no organisations which represent the interests of the Turkish minority in Bulgaria, although experts see an undersupply of media for this group in Bulgarian media. 2. TV VIEWERS’ RIGHTS: THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 2.1 Sector specific regulation In Bulgaria the only sector specific regulation is the Law on Radio and Television6 which tries to cover all relevant areas in media legislation7. It contains provisions regarding public and private broadcasting, establishes the Council for Electronic Media (for details see 2.3.), guarantees independence of radio and television operators from political and economic interference, includes the legal basis for Bulgarian national television and radio and rules for financing of broadcasting activities, content regulation regarding commercials, sponsorship and everything dealing with children/minors, licensing and registration of radio and television operators (see Annex 1.). Currently, there is a discussion about the necessity to establish a new law that would provide the CEM with better means to impose its sanctions and a different organising system regarding Bulgarian National Television and Bulgarian National Radio.8 There are drafts for a new legislation respectively amendments to the Law on Radio and Television. A Law on Electronic Media is under construction, but up to now the draft versions have been criticised by international media organisations and the European Council consistently.9 It is said that at the moment there is a “unique public consensus […] that a new media law is absolutely essential”10 and thus there is a chance of realising new legislation. Apart from this, there is a strategy paper on development of electronic media submitted by the Communications Regulation Commission (CRC), which still has not been discussed though.11 Next to other questions (e.g. frequency management) the strategy paper deals with questions of viewers’ interests, for example, it aims to implement the regulatory principles, upon which the policy of the EU in the field of audiovisual sector is based, like developing public television, which guarantees pluralism and protection of the public interest by forming public opinion; increased supervision over programmes viewed by minors, and implementing self- regulation, jointly performed by operators and audiences. 38 Broadcasting and Citizens 2.2 Regulatory practices for positive and negative content regulation In Chapter I, Art. 10 of the Law on Radio and Television12, radio and television operators are obliged not to broadcast programmes suggesting intolerance, contradicting the good manners, offering pornography, or praising violence or promoting discrimination with regard to race, gender, religion or nationality. In addition, article 10 includes the rules according to the EU directive “Television without Frontiers” concerning quota for European productions and independent producers. In Art. 16 it is codified that broadcasters may not use information concerning the life of individuals without their consent unless it concerns citizens carrying out legal capacities of state bodies or citizens whose decisions have an effect on society or persons, a sentence has been enacted for premeditated crime of general nature. If broadcasters violate these rules, they have to publicly apologise to the person affected. Art. 17 includes the general obligation that “radio and television broadcasters shall be accountable for the content of the program services provided by them”. In detail the article prescribes that broadcasters may not create or provide programmes directed at damaging the physical, mental and moral development of children and minors; but this does not apply to encrypted channels and/or programmes broadcast between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. and clearly marked by a warning signal. 2.3 Instruments established by law The Law on Radio and Television in Chapter II establishes the Council for Electronic Media13 (CEM) which is responsible for monitoring media activities and enforcing the interests of society by “defending the freedom and pluralism of the speech and the information, as well as the independence of the radio and television operators.”14 The council consists of nine members, five of them elected by the National Assembly and the other four appointed by the President of the Republic. Every person of “Bulgarian citizenship, who has as permanent address on the territory of the country, with higher education and professional experience in the sphere of the electronic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radio Evolution: Conference Proceedings September, 14-16, 2011, Braga, University of Minho: Communication and Society Research Centre ISBN 978-989-97244-9-5
    Oliveira, M.; Portela, P. & Santos, L.A. (eds.) (2012) Radio Evolution: Conference Proceedings September, 14-16, 2011, Braga, University of Minho: Communication and Society Research Centre ISBN 978-989-97244-9-5 Euranet: a Case Study of Pan-European Radio MANUEL FERNÁNDEZ SANDE AND J.IGNACIO GALLEGO PÉREZ Universidad Complutense de Madrid / Universidad Carlos III de Madrid [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract: From its early beginnings as a single idea to its current status as an organisation of 27 member states, the European Union has suffered from the lack of a common cultural identity. This debility has greatly hindered the progress of European consolidation and convergence, which to the present day has been manifested mainly through economic and policy agreements. The European Union has achieved many goals during the last 25 years, including the implementation of a common currency that has led to a real economic union between member states and the transfer of various national competences to European institutions. However, the construction of a real European civil society has proved to be a greater challenge; Europeans still cling to their individual national, regional and local identities and have not developed a greater sense of European citizenship. The Euranet Project—an initiative to create a pan-European radio network—began in December 2007 as a joint proposal put forth by 13 national and regional radio stations operating in 12 European countries. Its stated mission when it went on air on April 1, 2008 was to broadcast European news from a transnational perspective to local communities within the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • European Public Service Broadcasting Online
    UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI, COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH CENTRE (CRC) European Public Service Broadcasting Online Services and Regulation JockumHildén,M.Soc.Sci. 30November2013 ThisstudyiscommissionedbytheFinnishBroadcastingCompanyǡYle.Theresearch wascarriedoutfromAugusttoNovember2013. Table of Contents PublicServiceBroadcasters.......................................................................................1 ListofAbbreviations.....................................................................................................3 Foreword..........................................................................................................................4 Executivesummary.......................................................................................................5 ͳIntroduction...............................................................................................................11 ʹPre-evaluationofnewservices.............................................................................15 2.1TheCommission’sexantetest...................................................................................16 2.2Legalbasisofthepublicvaluetest...........................................................................18 2.3Institutionalresponsibility.........................................................................................24 2.4Themarketimpactassessment.................................................................................31 2.5Thequestionofnewservices.....................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Service Broadcasting Culture
    The Series Published by the European Audiovisual Observatory What can you IRIS Special is a series of publications from the European Audiovisual Observatory that provides you comprehensive factual information coupled with in-depth analysis. The expect from themes chosen for IRIS Special are all topical issues in media law, which we explore for IRIS Special in you from a legal perspective. IRIS Special’s approach to its content is tri-dimensional, with overlap in some cases, depending on the theme. terms of content? It offers: 1. a detailed survey of relevant national legislation to facilitate comparison of the legal position in different countries, for example IRIS Special: Broadcasters’ Obligations to Invest in Cinematographic Production describes the rules applied by 34 European states; 2. identifi cation and analysis of highly relevant issues, covering legal developments and trends as well as suggested solutions: for example IRIS Special, Audiovisual Media Services without Frontiers – Implementing the Rules offers a forward-looking analysis that will continue to be relevant long after the adoption of the EC Directive; 3. an outline of the European or international legal context infl uencing the national legislation, for example IRIS Special: To Have or Not to Have – Must-carry Rules explains the European model and compares it with the American approach. What is the source Every edition of IRIS Special is produced by the European Audiovisual Observatory’s legal information department in cooperation with its partner organisations and an extensive The Public of the IRIS Special network of experts in media law. The themes are either discussed at invitation-only expertise? workshops or tackled by selected guest authors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground
    Media Programme SEE A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground Public Service Media in South East Europe RECONNECTING WITH DATA CITIZENS TO BIG VALUES – FROM A Pillar of Democracy of Shaky on Ground A Pillar www.kas.de www.kas.dewww.kas.de Media Programme SEE A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground Public Service Media in South East Europe www.kas.de Imprint Copyright © 2019 by Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Media Programme South East Europe Publisher Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Authors Viktorija Car, Nadine Gogu, Liana Ionescu, Ilda Londo, Driton Qeriqi, Miroljub Radojković, Nataša Ružić, Dragan Sekulovski, Orlin Spassov, Romina Surugiu, Lejla Turčilo, Daphne Wolter Editors Darija Fabijanić, Hendrik Sittig Proofreading Boryana Desheva, Louisa Spencer Translation (Bulgarian, German, Montenegrin) Boryana Desheva, KERN AG, Tanja Luburić Opinion Poll Ipsos (Ivica Sokolovski), KAS Media Programme South East Europe (Darija Fabijanić) Layout and Design Velin Saramov Cover Illustration Dineta Saramova ISBN 978-3-95721-596-3 Disclaimer All rights reserved. Requests for review copies and other enquiries concerning this publication are to be sent to the publisher. The responsibility for facts, opinions and cross references to external sources in this publication rests exclusively with the contributors and their interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Table of Content Preface v Public Service Media and Its Future: Legitimacy in the Digital Age (the German case) 1 Survey on the Perception of Public Service
    [Show full text]
  • Must-Carry Rules, and Access to Free-DTT
    Access to TV platforms: must-carry rules, and access to free-DTT European Audiovisual Observatory for the European Commission - DG COMM Deirdre Kevin and Agnes Schneeberger European Audiovisual Observatory December 2015 1 | Page Table of Contents Introduction and context of study 7 Executive Summary 9 1 Must-carry 14 1.1 Universal Services Directive 14 1.2 Platforms referred to in must-carry rules 16 1.3 Must-carry channels and services 19 1.4 Other content access rules 28 1.5 Issues of cost in relation to must-carry 30 2 Digital Terrestrial Television 34 2.1 DTT licensing and obstacles to access 34 2.2 Public service broadcasters MUXs 37 2.3 Must-carry rules and digital terrestrial television 37 2.4 DTT across Europe 38 2.5 Channels on Free DTT services 45 Recent legal developments 50 Country Reports 52 3 AL - ALBANIA 53 3.1 Must-carry rules 53 3.2 Other access rules 54 3.3 DTT networks and platform operators 54 3.4 Summary and conclusion 54 4 AT – AUSTRIA 55 4.1 Must-carry rules 55 4.2 Other access rules 58 4.3 Access to free DTT 59 4.4 Conclusion and summary 60 5 BA – BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 61 5.1 Must-carry rules 61 5.2 Other access rules 62 5.3 DTT development 62 5.4 Summary and conclusion 62 6 BE – BELGIUM 63 6.1 Must-carry rules 63 6.2 Other access rules 70 6.3 Access to free DTT 72 6.4 Conclusion and summary 73 7 BG – BULGARIA 75 2 | Page 7.1 Must-carry rules 75 7.2 Must offer 75 7.3 Access to free DTT 76 7.4 Summary and conclusion 76 8 CH – SWITZERLAND 77 8.1 Must-carry rules 77 8.2 Other access rules 79 8.3 Access to free DTT
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Broadcasting Since the 90S, from Radio E to Euranet Plus
    J. Ignacio Gallego The communication policy of the [email protected] Assistant Professor. Faculty of European Commission: radio Humanities, Communication and Library Sciences. Carlos III broadcasting since the 90s, University of Madrid. Spain. from Radio E to Euranet Plus Manuel Fernández Sande [email protected] Abstract Associate Professor. Faculty of In the middle of the most pronounced economic crisis since its Media and Communication inception, many of the communication policies initiated by the Science. Complutense European Union in recent decades must be evaluated and University of Madrid. Spain. redefined considering the future of the Union. The challenge to define Europe and create a common identity that respects the Ariane Demonget diversity of cultures within the Union has been attempted [email protected] through various media policies. We explore the recent evolution Associate Researcher. University of Perpignan. France. of European radio policies, considering a range of projects from the global to network levels (e.g. Radio E, Euranet and Euranet Plus) that are fundamental to our understanding of the use of Submitted April 5, 2014 media in the development of a European identity that respects Approved the diversity of cultures within the Union. November 28, 2014 Keywords © 2015 Communication & Society Radio broadcasting, European Commission, public policies, ISSN 0214-0039 diversity, communication E ISSN 2386-7876 doi: 10.15581/003.28.1.13-25 www.communication-society.com 1. Introduction 2015 – Vol. 28(1), At present, in the midst of the most pronounced economic crisis since pp. 13-25 the inception of the European Union (EU), Europe has an opportunity to reconsider its common future.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribune Internationale Des Compositeurs 2009
    Paris, 12.VI.2009 TRIBUNE INTERNATIONALE DES COMPOSITEURS 2009 2009 INTERNATIONAL ROSTRUM OF COMPOSERS Paris, 8 – 12 VI 2009 LISTE FINALE DES PARTICIPANTS / FINAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Président / Chairman : Heikki Valsta (Finlande/Finland) PAYS/ ORGANISME DE RADIODIFFUSION/ DELEGUE(S)/ COUNTRY BROADCASTING ORGANISATION DELEGATE(S) ALLEMAGNE/ Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg (sans délégué) GERMANY Deutschlandradio Kultur Rainer PÖLLMANN ARGENTINE/ Radio Universidad Nacional LM María Vanesa RUFFA ARGENTINA AUSTRALIE/ Australian Broadcasting Corporation Duncan YARDLEY AUSTRALIA AUTRICHE/ ORF Austrian Broadcasting Corporation Ursula STRUBINSKY AUSTRIA BRESIL/BRASIL Radio MEC sans délégué/ Without delegate BULGARIE/ Bulgarian National Radio Maria Vassileva POPOVA BULGARIA CANADA Canadian Broadcasting Corporation/ Sans délégué/ Société Radio-Canada Without delegate DANEMARK/ DR- Danish Broadcasting Corporation Max FAGE-PEDERSEN DENMARK ESPAGNE/ Radio Nacional de España Ana Vega TOSCANO SPAIN ESTONIE/ Estonian Public Broadcasting Tiia TEDER ESTONIA FINLANDE/ Finnish Broadcasting Co. Karoliina VESA FINLAND FRANCE Radio France Jurjen SOETING CHINE/HONG KONG SAR/ Radio Television Hong Kong (RTHK) Man-Ngai TANG CHINA/HONG KONG SAR IRLANDE/ RTÉ Lyric fm Eoin O KELLY IRELAND ISLANDE/ Icelandic National Broadcasting Bergljót HARALDSDÓTTIR ICELAND Service (RUV) LITUANIE/ Lithuanian Radio Jurate KATINAITE LITHUANIA MEXIQUE/ Radio UNAM Alejandro CASTAÑOS MEXICO NORVEGE/ Norwegian Broadcasting Organization Håkon HEGGSTAD NORWAY NOUVELLE ZELANDE/ Radio New Zealand
    [Show full text]
  • Television Across Europe
    media-incovers-0902.qxp 9/3/2005 12:44 PM Page 4 OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE EU MONITORING AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM NETWORK MEDIA PROGRAM ALBANIA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA BULGARIA Television CROATIA across Europe: CZECH REPUBLIC ESTONIA FRANCE regulation, policy GERMANY HUNGARY and independence ITALY LATVIA LITHUANIA Summary POLAND REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA ROMANIA SERBIA SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA TURKEY UNITED KINGDOM Monitoring Reports 2005 Published by OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE Október 6. u. 12. H-1051 Budapest Hungary 400 West 59th Street New York, NY 10019 USA © OSI/EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program, 2005 All rights reserved. TM and Copyright © 2005 Open Society Institute EU MONITORING AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM Október 6. u. 12. H-1051 Budapest Hungary Website <www.eumap.org> ISBN: 1-891385-35-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. A CIP catalog record for this book is available upon request. Copies of the book can be ordered from the EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program <[email protected]> Printed in Gyoma, Hungary, 2005 Design & Layout by Q.E.D. Publishing TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................ 5 Preface ........................................................................... 9 Foreword ..................................................................... 11 Overview ..................................................................... 13 Albania ............................................................... 185 Bosnia and Herzegovina ...................................... 193
    [Show full text]
  • RESULTS of the 2012 International Rostrum of Composers
    For immediate release RESULTS of the 2012 International Rostrum of Composers Stockholm, May 25, 2012 – Tierra Viva (2009) for piano and tape by Argentinean composer Pedro OCHOA (born 1968) and Attempt at Screaming (2011), for ensemble by young Bulgarian composer Peter KERKELOV (born 1984) are the works selected by radio music producers participating in the 59th International Rostrum of Composers (IRC) held at the Radiohuset in Stockholm, from May 22 to 25, 2012. A flagship programme of the International Music Council, this year’s IRC edition was for the first time in the history of the IRC co-organised by Swedish Radio. Pursuing its mission to promote contemporary music creation through broadcasting for almost sixty years, the annual Rostrum has this year again strengthened its role as one of the most important “rendez-vous” for professional exchange between radio producers. Its overall objective remains fostering the exchange of performances of contemporary music between broadcasting organisations. For example, works chosen at the preceding Rostrum (2011) were given some 500 broadcasts by participating networks as well as affiliates of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU). The 2012 Rostrum gathered representatives from 27 national radio networks from four continents, which presented 50 works composed within the five years preceding the Rostrum. 13 of these works were by composers under the age of 30. YLE Executive Producer Heikki Valsta (Finland) chaired the sessions. After the listening sessions, the assembly of delegates selected and recommended the most distinctive works in two categories: general and “young composers under 30”. These and other works will be presented in concerts and broadcast after the Rostrum by the participating and other interested radio stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 103
    Bulgaria 103 BULGARIA 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ON MEDIA AND MEDIA USE The official statistics show that Bulgaria’s national literacy rate is high. All people over 15 years Literacy and who are able to read and write are defined as ‘literate’. According to Bulgaria’s latest census in education 2001 the literacy rate is 98.2 per cent. That includes 98.7 per cent of its male and 97.7 per cent of its female citizens. Generally the illiterate people are members of the Romany ethnic group who have dropped out of school at an early stage. According to a survey by the Ministry of Education, 57 per cent of the children who have dropped out of school indicated lack of finance as the main problem. However, it is hard to believe this is the only reason for their dropping out since 53 per cent of the children who regularly attend school also face financial problems. Seventy per cent of those who have stopped attending school define themselves as Roma, 15 per cent as Bulgarians and 11 per cent as of Turkish ethnicity. Half of them drop out of school between the ages of 10 and 15, 8 per cent before reaching the age of 10, and 44 per cent after turning 15. One of the fundamental reasons for their failure to attend school is their family. Surveys indicate that 72 per cent of parents have done nothing after discovering their children were not going to school. Research on media consumption shows that TV, radio and newspapers are the preferred media Media landscape sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia, NATO, and Black Sea Security for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    Russia, NATO, and Black Sea Security Russia, NATO, C O R P O R A T I O N STEPHEN J. FLANAGAN, ANIKA BINNENDIJK, IRINA A. CHINDEA, KATHERINE COSTELLO, GEOFFREY KIRKWOOD, DARA MASSICOT, CLINT REACH Russia, NATO, and Black Sea Security For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA357-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0568-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Cover graphic by Dori Walker, adapted from a photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Weston Jones. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The Black Sea region is a central locus of the competition between Russia and the West for the future of Europe.
    [Show full text]