DOCSLIB.ORG

A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Media Programme SEE A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground Public Service Media in South East Europe RECONNECTING WITH DATA CITIZENS TO BIG VALUES – FROM A Pillar of Democracy of Shaky on Ground A Pillar www.kas.de www.kas.dewww.kas.de Media Programme SEE A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground Public Service Media in South East Europe www.kas.de Imprint Copyright © 2019 by Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Media Programme South East Europe Publisher Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Authors Viktorija Car, Nadine Gogu, Liana Ionescu, Ilda Londo, Driton Qeriqi, Miroljub Radojković, Nataša Ružić, Dragan Sekulovski, Orlin Spassov, Romina Surugiu, Lejla Turčilo, Daphne Wolter Editors Darija Fabijanić, Hendrik Sittig Proofreading Boryana Desheva, Louisa Spencer Translation (Bulgarian, German, Montenegrin) Boryana Desheva, KERN AG, Tanja Luburić Opinion Poll Ipsos (Ivica Sokolovski), KAS Media Programme South East Europe (Darija Fabijanić) Layout and Design Velin Saramov Cover Illustration Dineta Saramova ISBN 978-3-95721-596-3 Disclaimer All rights reserved. Requests for review copies and other enquiries concerning this publication are to be sent to the publisher. The responsibility for facts, opinions and cross references to external sources in this publication rests exclusively with the contributors and their interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Table of Content Preface v Public Service Media and Its Future: Legitimacy in the Digital Age (the German case) 1 Survey on the Perception of Public Service Media in South East Europe 17 Public Broadcasting in Albania: Between Legacy and Future Opportunities 27 Public Service Media in Bosnia-Herzegovina: A Crisis of Legitimacy and Sustainability 49 Public Service Media in Bulgaria: Lack of Sustainability 69 Public Service Radio and Television in Croatia - at the Service of the Public or Politics? 93 Kosovo’s Public Broadcaster – Insufficient Editorial Independence and Management Competence 113 The Story of an Unfinished Transformation to True Public Service Media (the Moldovan case) 133 Public Service Media in Montenegro - a Leaf Aflutter in the Wind 151 Macedonian Radio Television in Need of New Professional Standards 173 Public Service Media in Romania: The Battle for Independence from Politics 191 Public Service Media in Serbia: A State of Flux 215 About Us 235 iii Preface Dear readers, Democracy cannot exist without free media. Journalists must be able to work independently – without political or economic influence or any other reprisals. This is also a recognition of the terrible history of the Second World War and the totalitarian rule of the National Socialists over a huge part of Europe. For this reason, public service media were established in (West) Germany after 1945 after the model of the BBC. It was without question a gift for Germany and its democratic development. Public service media – in Germany as well as in other European countries – have a legal task. They are exclusively committed to the welfare of all and must not unilaterally support a party, organisation or any other type of grouping. Its programmes should inform, educate, advise. They can and should also entertain. Its contents, whether on television, radio or online, still stand for seriousness and credibility. Despite all doubts, trust in public service media remains high in many countries. This is confirmed by regular opinion polls across Europe. In almost all countries in which the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) is represented, the public broadcasters are ranked in the first place. But this trust is not self-evident. Even public service media must always face social and, above all, technical developments, reflect repeatedly on its foundations and mission and find answers in the democratic discourse. This book gives an overview of public service media in South East Europe; referring to the ten countries, which the Media Programme of the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung covers. From Croatia to North Macedonia and Bulgaria to the Republic of Moldova, liberalised media markets have emerged following the collapse of socialism and its state-controlled media systems. State broadcasters have become public service media. For the first time, essential information about individual public broadcasters is being gathered. Media experts from the respective countries write, among other things, about the history, the legal framework, the financing model and organisational structures in place. The chapters are supplemented with the results of a v A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground recent representative opinion poll commissioned by the Media Programme and conducted by the research institute Ipsos. We have asked the same six questions in all ten countries. In the results summarised for the entire region, two answers are very clear: almost 70 percent of respondents say that public service media are important for democracy. Unfortunately, almost 65 percent see these channels under political influence. In South Europe, in particular, this discrepancy becomes visible and audible at demonstrations when people take to the streets against their government. Then usually public service media are focus of protests and have been criticised as mouthpieces of the government. As a Media Programme, we want to strengthen the role of free and independent media and improve the work opportunities for journalists. Freedom of the press and expression are central pillars of democracy. Here in South East Europe, we accompany the process of transformation – towards a united democratic Europe. In doing so, public service media play an important role. I am convinced that if public service media do not exist, one should invent them. They are essential for democracy – if they can act free of political influence and are well funded to fulfil their tasks. We wish you enjoyable reading! Hendrik Sittig Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Head of KAS Media Programme South East Europe vi Public Service Media and Its Future: Legitimacy in the Digital Age Public Service Media and Its Future: Legitimacy in the Digital Age The case of public service media in Germany Daphne Wolter Introduction Our democratic constitution requires a system of public service media (PSM) that is clearly differentiated from private services and that is simultaneously a tool of and a service provider for democracy. Digitalisation and the technological convergence of media have given television viewers a new power: programmes can now be received irrespective of time and place. Broadcasters are afraid of losing control as new smart TV systems reduce ordinary television to one of several options. Some experts even predict that broadcasting will completely disappear in the future; video services available worldwide will gradually replace it. But what role should the public service media play in this scenario? Will it be reduced to an insignificant niche or will it be completely written out of the future? From the viewpoint of public service media, the goal must be to remain in the ‘relevant set’. According to the so-called development guarantee1 one of the tasks of public service media is to adapt to the changing viewing habits of users. The first media ‘big bang’ 30 years ago brought a fundamental change to public service media with the introduction of the dual system (see also next section). The change was far from damaging, if one compares the German TV landscape internationally. Similarly, the second major ‘big bang’ in the form of media digitalisation can help public service media benefit and avoid becoming a victim of the digital transformation. The transformation must not be obstructed by 1 6th Broadcasting Ruling - German Federal Constitutional Court ruling (BVerfGE 83, 238), http://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv083238.html. 1 A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground regulatory media policy, however. On the contrary, regulators must promote the necessary reforms, in fact they must demand and shape them. The history of public service media in Germany As a response to Germany’s Nazi past, control of media and cultural policy in Germany is decentralised: responsibility is vested with the federal states as opposed to the federal republic. Each federal state enacts its own laws regulating media and cultural matters. The legal basis for broadcasting is the so-called German Interstate Treaty on Broadcasting (Rundfunkstaatsvertrag), a contract entered into by all sixteen federal states. The Treaty provides for state public media agencies part of the ARD, the ZDF and other broadcasters. As a result, the legal structure of the contract is shaped by a variety of laws and treaties.2 As part of Germany’s democratisation after World War II, public service media were introduced on the basis of, among others, the British model (BBC). To protect broadcasting media from renewed authoritarian intervention3, public broadcasting was established in 1949 with a government-mediated guarantee intended to ensure political independence. In 1950, broadcasters established the Association of Public Service Broadcasters of the Federal Republic of Germany (ARD). This was followed by the establishment of the Second German Television (ZDF) in 1961. These broadcasters are constituted as corporations under public law and financed by licence fees (more on this in the third section). Private broadcasters were established starting in the 1980s. Since then public service media have been one of the two branches of the so-called ‘dual broadcasting system’ of the German media landscape.
Recommended publications
  • Radio Evolution: Conference Proceedings September, 14-16, 2011, Braga, University of Minho: Communication and Society Research Centre ISBN 978-989-97244-9-5

    Radio Evolution: Conference Proceedings September, 14-16, 2011, Braga, University of Minho: Communication and Society Research Centre ISBN 978-989-97244-9-5

    Oliveira, M.; Portela, P. & Santos, L.A. (eds.) (2012) Radio Evolution: Conference Proceedings September, 14-16, 2011, Braga, University of Minho: Communication and Society Research Centre ISBN 978-989-97244-9-5 Euranet: a Case Study of Pan-European Radio MANUEL FERNÁNDEZ SANDE AND J.IGNACIO GALLEGO PÉREZ Universidad Complutense de Madrid / Universidad Carlos III de Madrid [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract: From its early beginnings as a single idea to its current status as an organisation of 27 member states, the European Union has suffered from the lack of a common cultural identity. This debility has greatly hindered the progress of European consolidation and convergence, which to the present day has been manifested mainly through economic and policy agreements. The European Union has achieved many goals during the last 25 years, including the implementation of a common currency that has led to a real economic union between member states and the transfer of various national competences to European institutions. However, the construction of a real European civil society has proved to be a greater challenge; Europeans still cling to their individual national, regional and local identities and have not developed a greater sense of European citizenship. The Euranet Project—an initiative to create a pan-European radio network—began in December 2007 as a joint proposal put forth by 13 national and regional radio stations operating in 12 European countries. Its stated mission when it went on air on April 1, 2008 was to broadcast European news from a transnational perspective to local communities within the European Union.
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006

    Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006

    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: BULGARIA October 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Bulgaria (Republika Bŭlgariya). Short Form: Bulgaria. Term for Citizens(s): Bulgarian(s). Capital: Sofia. Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities (in order of population): Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pleven, and Sliven. Independence: Bulgaria recognizes its independence day as September 22, 1908, when the Kingdom of Bulgaria declared its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Public Holidays: Bulgaria celebrates the following national holidays: New Year’s (January 1); National Day (March 3); Orthodox Easter (variable date in April or early May); Labor Day (May 1); St. George’s Day or Army Day (May 6); Education Day (May 24); Unification Day (September 6); Independence Day (September 22); Leaders of the Bulgarian Revival Day (November 1); and Christmas (December 24–26). Flag: The flag of Bulgaria has three equal horizontal stripes of white (top), green, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Settlement and Empire: According to archaeologists, present-day Bulgaria first attracted human settlement as early as the Neolithic Age, about 5000 B.C. The first known civilization in the region was that of the Thracians, whose culture reached a peak in the sixth century B.C. Because of disunity, in the ensuing centuries Thracian territory was occupied successively by the Greeks, Persians, Macedonians, and Romans. A Thracian kingdom still existed under the Roman Empire until the first century A.D., when Thrace was incorporated into the empire, and Serditsa was established as a trading center on the site of the modern Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
  • RADIO PUBLICZNE.Indb

    RADIO PUBLICZNE.Indb

    Recenzent prof. dr hab. Michał Gajlewicz, Społeczna Akademia Nauk Redakcja Anna Goryńska Projekt okładki Studio KARANDASZ Skład i łamanie JOLAKS – Jolanta Szaniawska © Copyright by Poltext sp. z o.o. © Copyright by Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego Warszawa 2015 Wydanie publikacji zostało dofinansowane przez Akademię Leona Koźmińskiego Poltext sp. z o.o. 02-230 Warszawa, ul. Jutrzenki 118 tel.: 22 632-64-20 e-mail: [email protected] internet: www.poltext.pl ISBN 978-83-7561-517-3 SpiS treści Wprowadzenie �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 7 Wykaz skrótów �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 13 rozdział 1. Media publiczne W społeczeństWie deMokratycznyM �� � � � � � � � � � 15 1.1. oczekiwania społeczne wobec mediów � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 15 1.2. Media publiczne a rynek � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 28 1.3. Media publiczne w europie Środkowo-Wschodniej � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 35 1.4. nowe technologie
  • Press Release Potsdam Declaration

    Press Release Potsdam Declaration

    Press Release Potsdam 19.10.2018 Potsdam Declaration signed by 21 public broadcasters from Europe “In times such as ours, with increased polarization, populism and fixed positions, public broadcasters have a vital role to play across Europe.” A joint statement, emphasizing the inclusive rather than divisive mission of public broadcasting, will be signed on Friday 19th October 2018 in Potsdam. Cilla Benkö, Director General of Sveriges Radio and President of PRIX EUROPA, and representatives from 20 other European broadcasters are making their appeal: “The time to stand up for media freedom and strong public service media is now. Our countries need good quality journalism and the audiences need strong collective platforms”. The act of signing is taking place just before the Awards Ceremony of this year’s PRIX EUROPA, hosted by rbb in Berlin and Potsdam from 13-19 October under the slogan “Reflecting all voices”. The joint declaration was initiated by the Steering Committee of PRIX EUROPA, which unites the 21 broadcasters. Potsdam Declaration, 19 October 2018 (full wording) by the 21 broadcasters from the PRIX EUROPA Steering Committee: In times such as ours, with increased polarization, populism and fixed positions, public broadcasters have a vital role to play across Europe. It has never been more important to carry on offering audiences a wide variety of voices and opinions and to look at complex processes from different angles. Impartial news and information that everyone can trust, content that reaches all audiences, that offers all views and brings communities together. Equally important: Public broadcasters make the joys of culture and learning available to everyone, regardless of income or background.
  • Zeitreise Mit Professor Van Dusen

    Zeitreise Mit Professor Van Dusen

    #06 Das JUNI 2021 Magazin Auf der Suche nach dem „Wir“ Ein Essay von Wolfgang Thierse Lesen nonstop Klagenfurt feiert die Literatur Zeitreise mit Professor van Dusen Die Krimiklassiker als Hörspielpodcast Gedruckt oder digital? Das Magazin erscheint nicht nur als gedrucktes Heft, sondern auch in digitaler Version auf deutschlandradio.de/magazin Wie lesen Sie das Magazin am liebsten? Anzeige Beileger_A4_CMYK_RZ.indd 1 20.04.21 15:55 Editorial Veranstaltungen #06 Liebe Abonnentinnen und Abonnenten, wir BERLIN möchten Sie auch in Zukunft gerne über unsere Programme informieren – in Form des gedruckten Magazins oder alternativ online. Daher fragen wir in diesem Monat Ihr Interesse an der Fortführung Ihres Abonnements ab. Mo., 14.6., 20.03 UHR RAUM DRESDEN VON DEUTSCHLANDRADIO, FUNKHAUS BERLIN In Concert Funkhauskonzert mit Peter Licht und Band Live-Übertragung in Deutschlandfunk Kultur Ob in Papierform oder digital – mit dem Magazin KÖLN sind Sie immer Bis 5.9. gut informiert RAUTENSTRAUCH- JOEST-MUSEUM Ausstellung: RESIST! Die Kunst des Widerstands und Denkfabrik-Denkraum mit ausgewählten Hörstücken zum Thema der Denkfabrik 2020 „Eine Welt 2.0 – Neulich fiel mir beim Aufräumen ein 20-bändiger Brockhaus in die Hände, den ich ‚Dekolonisiert Euch!‘“ Ende der 80er-Jahre zu meiner Konfirmation geschenkt bekommen habe. Das war museenkoeln/rauten- damals ein wirklich großes Geschenk, welches mir bei vielen Recherchen gute strauch-joest-museum Dienste geleistet hat. Inzwischen ist es lange her, dass ich eine Information in einem Ausgewählte Veranstal- gedruckten Lexikon nachgeschlagen habe, zu praktisch ist der schnelle Blick ins tungen und Konzerte Internet. werden bei Deutsch- landradio ohne Publikum aufgezeichnet. Diese Überhaupt haben sich Nutzungsgewohnheiten grundlegend verändert.
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020

    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020

    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
  • Indicators on the Level of Media Freedom and Journalists' Safety In

    Indicators on the Level of Media Freedom and Journalists' Safety In

    Indicators on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety in Macedonia Legal protection of media freedom [ 1 ] Indicators on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety in Macedonia Authors: Besim Nebiu, Naser Selmani, Dragan Sekulovski, Deniz Sulejman September 2018 Indicators on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety in Macedonia September 2018 Published by: Association of Journalists of Macedonia Gradski zid blok 13, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia Phone: +389 (0) 2 3298-139 Fax: +389 (0) 2 3116-447 www.znm.org.mk Authors: Besim Nebiu, Naser Selmani, Dragan Sekulovski, Deniz Sulejman Translation in English: Kristina Naceva This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia and its authors, and can in no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. [ 4 ] Indicators on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety in Macedonia Table of Contents Project Goals and Research Methodology .......7 C. Journalists’ security and statistics on impunity .........................33 Summary ...................................8 C.1.1. Attacks against journalists A. Legal protection of media freedom .......... 15 and other threats ...........................34 A.1. Does national law provide guarantees C.1.2. Murder of journalists and cases of media freedom and are they effectively in the last 15-20 years .......................36 implemented in practice? .................... 16 C.1.3. Pressure towards media, A.2. Does laws on libel cause effect of media and guild organizations ...............36 intimidation at journalists? .................... 19 C.2.1. Do state institutions and political actors A.3.
  • European Public Service Broadcasting Online

    European Public Service Broadcasting Online

    UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI, COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH CENTRE (CRC) European Public Service Broadcasting Online Services and Regulation JockumHildén,M.Soc.Sci. 30November2013 ThisstudyiscommissionedbytheFinnishBroadcastingCompanyǡYle.Theresearch wascarriedoutfromAugusttoNovember2013. Table of Contents PublicServiceBroadcasters.......................................................................................1 ListofAbbreviations.....................................................................................................3 Foreword..........................................................................................................................4 Executivesummary.......................................................................................................5 ͳIntroduction...............................................................................................................11 ʹPre-evaluationofnewservices.............................................................................15 2.1TheCommission’sexantetest...................................................................................16 2.2Legalbasisofthepublicvaluetest...........................................................................18 2.3Institutionalresponsibility.........................................................................................24 2.4Themarketimpactassessment.................................................................................31 2.5Thequestionofnewservices.....................................................................................36
  • The Public Service Broadcasting Culture

    The Public Service Broadcasting Culture

    The Series Published by the European Audiovisual Observatory What can you IRIS Special is a series of publications from the European Audiovisual Observatory that provides you comprehensive factual information coupled with in-depth analysis. The expect from themes chosen for IRIS Special are all topical issues in media law, which we explore for IRIS Special in you from a legal perspective. IRIS Special’s approach to its content is tri-dimensional, with overlap in some cases, depending on the theme. terms of content? It offers: 1. a detailed survey of relevant national legislation to facilitate comparison of the legal position in different countries, for example IRIS Special: Broadcasters’ Obligations to Invest in Cinematographic Production describes the rules applied by 34 European states; 2. identifi cation and analysis of highly relevant issues, covering legal developments and trends as well as suggested solutions: for example IRIS Special, Audiovisual Media Services without Frontiers – Implementing the Rules offers a forward-looking analysis that will continue to be relevant long after the adoption of the EC Directive; 3. an outline of the European or international legal context infl uencing the national legislation, for example IRIS Special: To Have or Not to Have – Must-carry Rules explains the European model and compares it with the American approach. What is the source Every edition of IRIS Special is produced by the European Audiovisual Observatory’s legal information department in cooperation with its partner organisations and an extensive The Public of the IRIS Special network of experts in media law. The themes are either discussed at invitation-only expertise? workshops or tackled by selected guest authors.
  • Civil-Military Features of the FRY

    Civil-Military Features of the FRY

    Civil-Military Features of the FRY 18. november 2002. - Dr Miroslav Hadzic Dr Miroslav Hadžić Faculty of Political Science Belgrade / Centre for Civil-Military Relations Occasional paper No.4 The direction of the profiling of civilian military relations in Serbia/FR Yugoslavia1 is determined by the situational circumstances and policies of the participants of different backgrounds and uneven strength. The present processes however, are the direct product of consequence of the disparate action of parties from the Democratic Opposition of Serbia (DOS) coalition, which have ruled the local political scene since the ousting of Milošević. It was their mediation that introduced the war and authoritarian heritage to the political scene, making it an obstacle for changing the encountered civil-military relations. The ongoing disputes within the DOS decrease, but also conceal the fundamental reasons for the lack of pro-democratic intervention of the new authorities in the civil-military domain. Numerous military and police incidents and affairs that have marked the post-October period in Serbia testify to this account.2 The incidents were used for political confrontation within the DOS instead as reasons for reform. This is why disputes regarding the statues of the military, police and secret services, as well as control of them have been reduced to the personal and/or political conflict between FRY President Vojislav Koštunica and Serbian Premier Zoran Djindjić.3 However, the analysis of the "personal equation" of the most powerful DOS leaders may reveal only differences in their political shade and intonation, but cannot reveal the fundamental reasons why Serbia has remained on the foundations of Milošević’s system.
  • Pregled Dostavljenih Kontakt Podataka O Nadležnim Organima Emitera Za

    Pregled Dostavljenih Kontakt Podataka O Nadležnim Organima Emitera Za

    Pregled dostavljenih kontakt podataka o nadležnim organima emitera za podnošenje prigovora u toku kampanje za izbore za odbornike u Skupštini opštine Nikšić, koji će biti održani 14. marta 2021. godine Naziv Naziv Ime R. br. Adresa Telefon / fax E-mail Radno vrijeme medija pravnog lica ovlašćenog lica Lokalni javni Radio i emiter Radio i Novice Cerovića 30, [email protected] 1. Vladimir Utješinović 067 000-823 07:00 - 15:00 Televizija Nikšić Televizija Nikšić Nikšić [email protected] d.o.o. 020 403-505, Bulevar Ivana 2. TV Nova M „Nova M“ d.o.o. Ivana Drobnjak Crnojevića 97, 069 192-139, [email protected] 09:00 -16:00 Podgorica fax 020 403-501 „Lutrija Crne Rimski Trg 50, 3. TV 7 Nebojša Božović n/a [email protected] 08:00 -16:00 Gore“ a.d. Podgorica 067 269-209 020 404-635 [email protected] Tatjana Ašanin „Televizija Vijesti" Trg nezavisnosti bb, 067 564-777 [email protected] 4. TV Vijesti Ana Novović 08:00 - 20:00 d.o.o. Podgorica 020 404-635 [email protected] Marijana Bojanić 067 678-976 020 404 635 09:00 - 15:00 „M.D.Company“ 13 Jul bb, 020 481-500 5. Radio D plus Mladen Milutinović [email protected] d.o.o. Podgorica fax 020 481-505 (radnim danima) „Jumedia Mont“ 13 Jul bb, 020 481-500 09:00 h - 15:00 6. Radio D Mladen Milutinović [email protected] d.o.o. Podgorica fax 020 481-505 (radnim danima) „Radio Zeta“ Nena Stajović Golubovci bb, 08:30 - 15:00 7.
  • Kino Nova 4,10 0,64 4 Diema Family 3,99 0,82 4 Btv Comedy 3,11 0,48 5 Diema 3,03 0,63 5 Btv Cinema 3,08 0,48

    Kino Nova 4,10 0,64 4 Diema Family 3,99 0,82 4 Btv Comedy 3,11 0,48 5 Diema 3,03 0,63 5 Btv Cinema 3,08 0,48

    Информационен бюлетин ТВ аудиторията в България през месец Януари 2020 г. Всички данни в настоящия бюлетин са с включена отложена гледаемост и гледаемост на гости 2020 ОБОБЩЕНИ ДАННИ ЗА МЕСЕЦА ЯНУАРИ – Национален панел: • Средна големина на Нетния панел – 1 112 домакинства; • Средна големина на Брутния панел – 1 303 домакинства; ТВ АУДИТОРИЯТА Средно-дневна телевизионна гледаемост (ATS) • Възрастова група 4+: 4:57:03 (hh:mm:ss) БЪЛГАРИЯ | БЪЛГАРИЯ - • (+ 00:02:12 в сравнение с м. Декември, 2019 г.) • Възрастова група 18-49: 3:44:23 (hh:mm:ss) • (+ 00:00:34 в сравнение с м. Декември, 2019 г.) Total Rating (All TV Channels, 4+): 20,63% • |НАЦИОНАЛЕН ПАНЕЛ ПАНЕЛ |НАЦИОНАЛЕН (+ 0.15 в сравнение с м. Декември, 2019 г.) Average daily Reach (All TV Channels, 4+): 71,84% • (+ 0.90 в сравнение с м. Декември, 2019 г.) Monthly Reach (All TV Channels, 4+): 95,19% • (- 0.06 в сравнение с м. Декември, 2019 г.) 2 ИНФОРМАЦИОНЕН БЮЛЕТИН ИНФОРМАЦИОНЕН 2020 ATS (HH:MM) ЯНУАРИ – Понеделник Вторник Сряда Четвъртък Петък Събота Неделя ВСИЧКИ ТВ КАНАЛИ 06:00 – 06:00 Ч. ТВ АУДИТОРИЯТА 1 2 3 4 5 4+ 5:21 4:58 4:56 5:03 5:33 БЪЛГАРИЯ | БЪЛГАРИЯ - 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4:54 4:41 4:38 4:40 4:36 5:08 5:34 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 4:38 4:32 4:43 4:48 4:51 5:11 5:40 |НАЦИОНАЛЕН ПАНЕЛ ПАНЕЛ |НАЦИОНАЛЕН 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4:44 4:47 4:38 4:50 4:52 5:01 5:13 27 28 29 30 31 4:55 4:48 5:03 5:00 4:54 3 ИНФОРМАЦИОНЕН БЮЛЕТИН ИНФОРМАЦИОНЕН 2020 ATS (HH:MM) ЯНУАРИ – Понеделник Вторник Сряда Четвъртък Петък Събота Неделя ВСИЧКИ ТВ КАНАЛИ 06:00 – 06:00 Ч.