DOCSLIB.ORG

(Parabolic Trough) on the Farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape – Final Consultation Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Parabolic Trough) on the Farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape – Final Consultation Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the proposed Concentrated Solar Power Plant (Parabolic Trough) on the farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape – Final Consultation Environmental Impact Report April 2016 Document Description Client: Solafrica Energy (Pty) Ltd Project Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the proposed Concentrated Solar Power Plant (Parabolic Trough) on the farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape Royal HaskoningDHV Reference Number: T01.JNB.000565 Compiled by: Johan Blignaut Date: April 2016 Location: Woodmead Review and approval: Prashika Reddy Page | i Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach to the Environmental Impact Assessment Study ............................................................... 1 1.2.1 Conclusions of the Environmental Scoping Study (ESS) ................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Environmental Impact Assessment Process ...................................................................................... 2 1.2.2.1 Environmental Impact Assessment Report Structure .................................................................. 2 1.2.2.2 Specialist Studies ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2.3 Final Environmental Management Programme ............................................................................ 5 1.3 Concurrent Licencing Processes ....................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1 Water Use Licence ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.3.2 Zoning ................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.4 Details of the Environmental Assessment Practitioner ...................................................................... 8 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................ 9 2.1 Site Locality ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Detailed Design of the CSP Plant using Parabolic Trough Technology ............................................ 9 2.2.1 Solar Collector Field Parabolic Trough Systems ............................................................................. 12 2.2.1.1 Parabolic Trough Collectors ....................................................................................................... 12 2.2.1.2 Receiver Tube ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.2.1.3 Base Frame, Connecting Elements, Tracking and Control System ........................................... 12 2.2.2 Power Block ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.2.1 Pre-heating System .................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.2.2 Steam Generator System ........................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2.3 Steam Turbine Generator ........................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2.4 Air Cooled Condenser ................................................................................................................ 14 2.2.2.5 Generator/Synchronous Motor ................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2.6 Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF) .......................................................................................................... 15 2.2.3 Auxiliary Facilities/Infrastructure ...................................................................................................... 15 2.2.3.1 Water Abstraction System .......................................................................................................... 15 2.2.3.2 Water Storage (Regulation) Ponds ............................................................................................ 17 2.2.3.3 Water Treatment Infrastructure .................................................................................................. 18 2.2.3.4 Access Roads ............................................................................................................................. 19 2.2.3.5 Power Line .................................................................................................................................. 19 Page | ii 2.2.3.6 Waste Generation (Liquid Effluent) ............................................................................................ 20 2.2.3.7 Evaporation Ponds ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.3.8 Sanitary Waste ........................................................................................................................... 22 2.2.3.9 Solid Waste Generation.............................................................................................................. 23 2.2.3.10 Storeroom(s), Laydown Area, Construction Camp and Assembly Plant ................................... 24 2.3 Operations ........................................................................................................................................ 25 3 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................... 26 3.1 Site Alternatives ............................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.1 Site Alternatives identified within the Northern Cape Province ........................................................ 26 3.1.2 Consideration of the Sand Draai Farm for the Development of the new CSP Plant ....................... 27 3.2 Technology Alternatives ................................................................................................................... 28 3.3 Design/Layout Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 30 3.3.1 Linear Infrastructure Corridors ......................................................................................................... 30 3.3.1.1 Water Supply Pipelines .............................................................................................................. 30 3.3.1.2 Access Roads ............................................................................................................................. 30 3.3.1.3 Power (Transmission) Line ......................................................................................................... 30 3.4 No-Go Alternative ............................................................................................................................. 31 4 PROJECT NEED AND DESIRABILITY ...................................................................... 32 5 LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................ 35 5.1 National Environmental Management Act (No 107 of 1998) ........................................................... 35 5.1.1 EIA Regulations (2014) .................................................................................................................... 35 5.2 National Environmental Management: Waste Act (No 59 of 2008) ................................................. 37 5.3 The National Water Act (No 36 of 1998) .......................................................................................... 38 5.4 National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (No 39 of 2004) ........................................... 39 5.5 Hazardous Substance Act (No 15 of 1973) and Regulations .......................................................... 39 5.6 Other Relevant Acts, Guidelines, Department Policies and Environmental Management Instruments 40 6 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .......................................................................................... 42 6.1 Consultation with Competent Authorities ......................................................................................... 43 6.2 Consultation with other Relevant Authorities and Key Stakeholders ............................................... 44 6.3 I&AP Database ................................................................................................................................. 44 6.4 Identification of Interested and Affected Parties .............................................................................. 44 6.5 Advertising ........................................................................................................................................ 44 6.6 Issues Trail ....................................................................................................................................... 44 6.7 Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kheis Local Municipality, Northern Cape
    PROPOSED NEW TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT ON ERF 1, ERF 45, ERF 47, WEGDRAAI, !KHEIS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT D:E&NC reference number: NC/EIA/10/ZFM/!KHE/WED1/2020 JANUARY 2021 !KHEIS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY EnviroAfrica PROPOSED NEW TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT ON ERF 1, ERF 45, ERF 47, WEGDRAAI, !KHEIS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE D:E&NC Ref No.: NC/EIA/10/ZFM/!KHE/WED1/2020 PREPARED FOR: !Kheis Local Municipality Private Bag X2, Wegdraai, 8850 Tel: 054 833 9500 PREPARED BY: EnviroAfrica P.O. Box 5367 Helderberg 7135 Tel: 021 – 851 1616 Fax: 086 – 512 0154 Page | 2 Wegdraai Housing_ Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report EnviroAfrica EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The !Kheis Local Municipality is proposing that a new township development, consisting of approximately 360 erven and associated infrastructure on Erven 1, 45 and 47, Wegdraai. The proposed project entails the development of approximately 360 erven with an average including associated infrastructure such as roads, and water, stormwater, effluent and electricity reticulation. The total area to be developed measures approximately forty-five (45) hectares. The proposed development will be comprised of approximately; • 364 x Residential Zone I units: dwelling house/ residential house containing one residential unit - a self-contained interlinking group of rooms for the accommodation and housing of a single family, or a maximum of four persons; • 3 x Business Zone I units: business building / premises which will be used as shops and/or
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment
    Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the proposed Concentrated Solar Power Plant (Parabolic Trough) on the farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape – Environmental Scoping Report A Report for Solafrica 14/12/16/3/3/3/203 – Parabolic Trough DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Client: Solafrica Energy (Pty) Ltd Project Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the proposed Concentrated Solar Power Plant (Parabolic Trough) on the farm Sand Draai 391, Northern Cape Royal HaskoningDHV Reference Number: T01.JNB.000565 Authority Reference Number: 14/12/16/3/3/3/203 – Parabolic Trough Compiled by: Johan Blignaut Date: July 2015 Location: Woodmead Review: Prashika Reddy & Malcolm Roods Approval: Malcolm Roods _____________________________ Signature © Royal HaskoningDHV All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission from Royal HaskoningDHV. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Need and Desirability ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers Programme (REIPPPP) and Integrated Resource Plan (2010) ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I – Avifauna Scoping Study
    SOLARRESERVE ARRIESFONTEIN SOLAR POWER PLANT: PHOTOVOLTAIC PHASE 1 - 3 Appendix I – Avifauna Scoping Study Page 250 260380PWE : 1 Rev A : 2012-03-05 PROPOSED ARRIESFONTEIN SOLAR THERMAL ENERGY POWER PLANT DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST AVIFAUNAL IMPACT ASSESMENT SCOPING REPORT November 2011 Andrew Pearson Endangered Wildlife Trust 011 486 1102 [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Solar Reserve SA (Pty) Ltd is planning a Solar Thermal Energy Power Plant (or otherwise known as a Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plant), as well as a multi-phase Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Project, within a single development site in the Northern Cape, South Africa. The Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) was subsequently appointed to conduct an avifaunal specialist study. Very few CSP plants have been constructed worldwide to date, and knowledge on the associated avifaunal impacts remains limited. The site consists mainly of uniform, arid vegetation types. Few permanent water bodies were observed on site. The proposed site falls within the Quarter Degree Grid Square (QDGS), 2823BD, while data from three additional squares, 2823BA, 2823BB, and 2823BC was also considered due to their close proximity to the site. The South African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP) recorded 12 Red Listed Species (Harrison et al, 1997), across all four squares, of which 5 are classified as Vulnerable, and 7 as Near Threatened. One additional species, the White Stork, is also included as it is protected internationally under the Bonn Convention on Migratory Species. Various other species relevant to the project were identified and include raptors, doves, pigeons and aerial foragers such as swallows and swifts. In general, SABAP2 data showed low counting effort for study site and immediate surrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Terrestrial Television Infrastructure Rollout
    Digital Terrestrial Television Infrastructure Rollout Environmental Impact Assessment - Nakop - 1 1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: NAKOP 1.1 INTRODUCTION The farm Nakop is privately owned, belonging to Mr and Mrs Tonnemacher. The farm is located approximately 5km east of the Namibian Border post and approximately 6km east of the nearest settlement which is called Ariamsvlei. The presence of the Namibian border post en route to South Africa contributes to a large average number of tourists passing through the town annually. 1.2 RATIONALE FOR SITE The position of the existing microwave tower at Nakop has very good coverage even beyond the Namibian border into South Africa, covering large parts of the south-eastern extremities of Namibia (Figure 1-1). This microwave tower is however very visible from the B3 road to South Africa. For this reason the proposed site is located close to the existing infrastructure but further back from the edge of the plateau to ensure that it is not quite as visible as the existing infrastructure. Figure 1-1: Predicted coverage of the existing microwave tower at Nakop. Digital Terrestrial Television Infrastructure Rollout – NBC EIA - Nakop August 2013 2 1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION Ariamsvlei is located at the foot of a plateau and as one approaches the Orange River approximately 40km south of the town, there is a sharp decrease in elevation. The surrounding area forms part of the Nama Karoo biome and comprises of a combination of small succulents and grass species. Although not particularly high in faunal diversity, the rocky side slopes of the plateau are an optimal niche for the occurrence of a variety of reptiles and birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainplace Codelist.Xls
    Main Place Code Sub_Place Code Code !Kheis 31801 Gannaput SH 31801002 315 !Kheis 31801 Wegdraai SH 31801008 315 !Kheis 31801 Kimberley NU 31801006 315 !Kheis 31801 Kenhardt NU 31801005 316 !Kheis 31801 Gordonia NU 31801003 315 !Kheis 31801 Prieska NU 31801007 306 !Kheis 31801 Boegoeberg SH 31801001 306 !Kheis 31801 Grootdrink SH 31801004 315 ||Khara Hais 31701 Gordonia NU 31701001 316 ||Khara Hais 31701 Gordonia NU 31701001 315 ||Khara Hais 31701 Ses-Brugge AH 31701003 315 ||Khara Hais 31701 Klippunt AH 31701002 315 42nd Hill 41501 42nd Hill SP 41501000 426 42nd Hill 41501 Intabazwe 41501001 426 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Mabundeni 53501008 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 KwaQonsa 53501004 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Hlambanyathi 53501003 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Bazaneni 53501002 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Amatshamnyama 53501001 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 KwaSeme 53501006 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 KwaQunwane 53501005 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 KwaTembeka 53501007 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Abakwahlabisa SP 53501000 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Makopini 53501009 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Ngxongwana 53501011 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Nqotweni 53501012 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Nqubeka 53501013 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Sitezi 53501014 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Tanganeni 53501015 535 Abakwahlabisa 53501 Mgangado 53501010 535 Abambo 51801 Enyokeni 51801003 522 Abambo 51801 Abambo SP 51801000 522 Abambo 51801 Emafikeni 51801001 522 Abambo 51801 Eyosini 51801004 522 Abambo 51801 Emhlabathini 51801002 522 Abambo 51801 KwaMkhize 51801005 522 Abantungwa/Kholwa 51401 Driefontein 51401003 523
    [Show full text]
  • REIPPP Projects
    REIPPP Projects Window 1 Projects Net capacity Technology Project Location Technology Developer Contractor Status MW supplier Klipheuwel – Dassiefontein Group 5, Dassiesklip Wind Energy Facility Caledon, WC Wind 26,2 Sinovel Operational Wind Energy fFcility Iberdrola MetroWind Van Stadens Wind Port Elizabeth, EC Wind 26,2 MetroWind Sinovel Basil Read Operational Farm Hopefield Wind Farm Hopefield, WC Wind 65,4 Umoya Energy Vestas Vestas Operational Noblesfontein Noblesfontein, NC Wind 72,8 Coria (PKF) Investments 28 Vestas Vestas Operational Red Cap Kouga Wind Farm – Port Elizabeth, EC Wind 77,6 Red Cap Kouga Wind Farm Nordex Nordex Operational Oyster Bay Dorper Wind Farm Stormberg, EC Wind 97,0 Dorper Wind Farm Nordex Nordex Operational South Africa Mainstream Jeffreys Bay Jeffereys Bay, EC Wind 133,9 Siemens Siemens Operational Renewable Power Jeffreys Bay African Clean Energy Cookhouse Wind Farm Cookhouse, EC Wind 135,0 Suzlon Suzlon Operational Developments Khi Solar One Upington, NC Solar CSP 50,0 Khi Dolar One Consortium Abengoa Abengoa Construction KaXu Solar One Pofadder, NC Solar CSP 100,0 KaXu Solar One Consortium Abengoa Abengoa Operational SlimSun Swartland Solar Park Swartland, WC Solar PV 5,0 SlimSun BYD Solar Juwi, Hatch Operational RustMo1 Solar Farm Rustenburg, NWP Solar PV 6,8 RustMo1 Solar Farm BYD Solar Juwi Operational Mulilo Renewable Energy Solar De Aar, NC Solar PV 9,7 Gestamp Mulilo Consortium Trina Solar Gestamp, ABB Operational PV De Aar Konkoonsies Solar Pofadder, NC Solar PV 9,7 Limarco 77 BYD Solar Juwi Operational
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Performance Plan 2021-2022 to 2023-24
    ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN (VOTE 41) FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 2021/22 TO 2023/24 Published by the Department of Water and Sanitation Private Bag X313 Pretoria 0001 South Africa Tel: +2712 336 7500 Fax: +2712 336 8664 This annual performance plan can be obtained from www.dws.gov.za 4 5 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE Plan (VOTE 41) FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 2021/22 TO 2023/24 Foreword by the Minister ...........................................................................................................................................................................i Message from the Deputy Minister .......................................................................................................................................................iii Overview of the Accounting Officer .......................................................................................................................................................v Official sign ...............................................................................................................................................................................................off vi List of abbreviations and acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................vii Strategic overview .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Strategy map of the DWS ...........................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Kai ! Garib Final IDP 2020 2021
    KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY Integrated Development Plan 2020/2021 “Creating an economically viable and fully developed municipality, which enhances the standard of living of all the inhabitants / community of Kai !Garib through good governance, excellent service delivery and sustainable development.” June 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................1 2. IDP PLANNING PROCESS:......................................................................................2 2.1 IDP Steering Committee:...........................................................................................3 2.2 IDP Representative Forum.........................................................................................3 2.3 Process Overview: Steps & Events:.............................................................................4 2.4 Legislative Framework:…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 3. THE ORGANISATION:............................................................................................15 3.1 Institutional Development………………………………………………………………………………..... 15 3.2 The Vision & Mission:...............................................................................................16 3.3 The Values of Kai !Garib Municipality which guides daily conduct ...............................16 3.4 The functioning of the municipality............................................................................16 3.4.1 Council and council committees..............................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Handbook
    TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................... 3 1. OVERVIEW OF NAMIBIA ............................................................................................. 4 2. TRANSPORT SYSYEM ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Border posts ............................................................................................................................... 4 3. ROAD TRANSPORT LEGISLATION ............................................................................ 6 3.1 Speed Limits ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Traffic Fines ................................................................................................................................ 6 4. CROSS BORDER ROAD TRANSPORT PERMITS ....................................................... 7 5. ECONOMIC OUTLOOK ................................................................................................ 7 5.1 Trade Environment .................................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Trade Agreements ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Bokpoort CSP Plant in South Africa
    Dispatchable Solar Energy 24/7 – The Case of Bokpoort CSP plant in South Africa Nandu Bhula Deputy Managing Director (Southern Africa) At A Glance We develop power and desalination water plants In over a decade we have become the second largest power & water developer in the GCC region, and a name to contend with internationally. We have achieved this by developing, investing in and operating a world-class 2004 portfolio... Saudi Arabia 58 37.7+ 5.8 Assets* GW Power* Mm3 per day Desalinated Water* 2008 – 2010 Oman 12 $59+ bn 21.5% Jordan Countries USD of Assets Portfolio in Renewable Under Energy based on Management** Share of project cost 2012 – 2014 3,500+ 30+ ~60% Morocco Employees Nationalities Local South Africa Employment Turkey in projects * Figures inclusive of advanced development projects ** There is another $10.5 bn of projects in advanced development DEVELOP INVEST OPERATE 2015 – UAE We win bids as lead developer, While taking significant, We operate and maintain our by partnering with the best and long-term stakes in all our plants plants to the highest global Egypt focusing on cost leadership. standards Vietnam 15/12/2020 CSP – Status across the Globe •CSP technology implemented in 23 countries 30 000 across the globe 25 000 20 000 •Over 6,000MW in operation 15 000 10 000 •Over 3,500MW in construction 5 000 - •Almost 25,000MW planned or in development Planned CSP Under Operational stages Projects Construction Source: https://solargis.com/maps-and-gis-data/overview/ 15/12/2020 ACWA Power CSP’s in MENA Region 150MW 950MW – (3 x 200MW CSP Trough, 1 x - Tower CSP+PV Hybrid 100MW CSP Tower & 250MW PV) 200MW - Trough 160MW - Trough 510MW – CSP Complex 15/12/2020 South African Renewable Energy IPP Program (REIPPP) • Started in 2011, the REIPPP is widely recognized as one of the most successful renewable energy procurement models in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Economic Impact Assessment Report Solafrica Parabolic Trough Power Plant
    Social and Economic Impact Assessment Report SolAfrica Parabolic Trough Power Plant Prepared for SolAfrica February 2016 SEIA Report – Solafrica Central Receiver Power Plant DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Client: Solafrica Photovoltaic Energy Limited Report Name: Social and Economic Impact Assessment - Solafrica Parabolic Trough Power Plant Royal HaskoningDHV Reference Number: T01.JNB.000565 Authority Reference Number: - Compiled by: Kim Moonsamy Date: February 2016 Location: Durban Reviewed by: Approval __________________________ Signature © Royal HaskoningDHV All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission from Royal HaskoningDHV i SEIA Report – Solafrica Central Receiver Power Plant TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1 DETAILS OF THE SPECIALIST AND EXPERTISE TO COMPILE A SPECIALIST REPORT 6 2 SPECIALIST DECLARATION 7 3 PROJECT SCOPE 7 3.1 PROJECT CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND 8 3.1.1 CENTRAL RECEIVER POWER PLANT TECHNOLOGY 9 3.1.2 POWER LINE OPTIONS 10 3.1.3 WATER PIPELINE OPTIONS 11 3.1.4 ROAD USE OPTIONS 12 4 DETAILS OF THE SITE INVESTIGATION 13 5 METHODOLOGY 13 5.1 SECONDARY DATA COLLECTION 13 5.2 PRIMARY DATA COLLECTION 14 6 FINDINGS OF THE ASSESSMENT 15 6.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE 15 6.2 THE NORTHERN CAPE’S SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHALLENGES 15 6.2.1 THE PROVINCIAL ECONOMY 16 6.3 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE !KHEIS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY 21 6.3.1 BACKGROUND AND DEMOGRAPHICS 21 6.3.2 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INDICATORS IN
    [Show full text]
  • Siyanda EMF Draft Status Quo Report
    SIYANDA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK – EMF REPORT Executive Summary Introduction Environomics, leading a multi disciplinary team, was appointed to undertake the compilation of an Environmetnal Management Framework (EMF). It was a joint project between the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), the Northern Cape Department of Toursim, Environment & Conservation (NCDTEC) and the Siyanda District Minicipality (SDM). The purpose of the project is to develop an EMF that will integrate municipal and provincial decision-making and align different government mandates in a way that will put the area on a sustainable development path. Description of the area The Siyanda District covers an area of 102,661.349km2 in the Northern Cape Province and lies on the great African plateau. It falls within four physical geographical regions namely: . The Kalahari; . Bushmanland; . the Griqua fold belt; and . the Ghaap Plateau. The Kalahari basin stretches northwards from just north of the Orange River into Botswana and Namibia. It is a flat, sand covered, semi-desert area, on average between 900m to 1200m above sea-level. It is characterised by a number of large pans to the north of Upington, by dry river beds (such as the Kuruman, Nossob and Molopo Rivers) and by dunes which strike north- west to south-east. The region is underlain by Karoo rocks and rocks belonging to the tertiary Kalahari Group. Outcrops are rare. Bushmanland is an arid, level sub-region of the Cape Middleveld to the east of the Namaqua Highlands. It is underlain by granitic Precambrian rocks on the western and northern sides and by Karoo rocks towards the south-east.
    [Show full text]