DOCSLIB.ORG

PS4417G: Special Topics in Political Psychology Course Description Course Text Course Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PS4417G: Special Topics in Political Psychology Course Description Course Text Course Assessment PS4417G: Special Topics in Political Psychology Department of Political Science – Western University, Winter 2020 Wednesday 1:30pm-3:30pm, SSC 4255 Instructor: Dr. Mathieu Turgeon Email: [email protected] Office hours: Tuesday from 10am-12pm or by appointment Course description The field of political psychology is vast and cuts through many subfields of political science. The focus in this course is about how theories of psychology apply to explain people’s political at- titudes and behaviours. In particular, the course is about how people receive, process, and use information they receive from their environment, interactions with others, the news media, and political elites to develop, change or maintain their political attitudes and make political decisions. Topics to be explored include candidate evaluation and choice, political knowledge and misinfor- mation, media effects, political polarization, and racial prejudice. Students will also be introduced to basic notions of the experimental design, a requisite to understanding the work produced in political psychology. Course text The required text for this course is: Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.). 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge University Press. Other readings are available electronically through Western Libraries and the course’s OWL site. Course assessment Students will be assessed in many different ways, including class participation, reading quizzes, short essays, and a final take-home exam. • Class participation (12%): students will be responsible to sign up for leading class discussion at least three (3) times during the semester. • 3 reading quizzes each worth 6%: I expect students to do all the required readings. To ensure that students keep up with the readings, I will randomly apply four reading quizzes during the semester. Students are required to take a minimum of three of the four quizzes, but can take all four. In that case, the three highest grades will be recorded. • 2 short essays each worth 20%: Students are required to produce two essays of about 1250 words each in response to two prompts. The first prompt will be distributed on February 5 and the second on March 4. The first essay is due in class on March 4 and the second on April 1. Essays are to be printed. No electronic copies will be accepted. No late essay will be accepted. • Final take-home exam (30%): Students will be given a cumulative final take-home exam on April 1 to be turned in by 5pm on April 3. The exam will consist of six short answer questions. Exams are to be printed. No electronic copies will be accepted. No late exam will be accepted. I will be in my office until 5pm on April 3 to receive your exam. 1 Topics and readings Week #1 (January 8): Course introduction Review of syllabus and class organization. Week #2 (January 15): Introduction to Political Psychology 1. Krosnick et al. 2010. “The Psychological Underpinnings of Political Behavior” In S. T. Fiske et al., eds., Handbook of Social Psychology. 5th Edition, Wiley. Suggested/Graduate students readings: Sears, D. O. 1987. “Political Psychology.” Annual Review of Psychology 38: 229-58. Simon, Herbert A. 1985. “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Polit- ical Science.” American Political Science Review 79: 293-304. Week #3 (January 22): Experimental Political Science 1. Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.). 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge University Press. Chapters 1-3. Suggested/Graduate students readings: Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.). 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge University Press. Chapters 4-9. Week #4 (January 29): Political Decision-Making and Evaluations 1. Redlawsk, David P., and Richard R. Lau. 2013. “Behavioral Decision-Making.” In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, and J. S. Levy, eds., The Oxford Handbok of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press. 2. Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.). 2011. Cambridge Hand- book of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge University Press. Chapter 13: “Candidate Impressions and Evaluations.” Suggested/Graduate students readings: Quattrone, George A., and Amos Tversky. 1988. “Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice.” American Political Science Review 82: 719-36. Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter, Chapters 1 and 4. University of Chicago Press. Week #5 (February 5): Online and Memory-Based Information Processing 1. Lodge, Milton. et al. 1989. “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” Ameri- can Political Science Review 83:399-419. 2. Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.). 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge University Press. Chapter 11: “Conscious and unconscious information processing with implications for experimental political science.” 3. Hayes, Danny and Mathieu Turgeon. 2010. “A Matter of Distinction: Candidate Polarization and Information Processing in election Campaigns.” American Politics Research 38: 165-192. Suggested/Graduate students readings: Wyer and Srull. 1989. “Human Cognition in its Social Context.” Psychological Review 93: 322-359. Kim, Young M. and Kelly Garrett. 2011. “Online and Memory-based: Revisiting the Rela- tionship Between Candidate Evaluation Processing Models.” Political Behavior 34: 345-368. 2 Week #6 (February 12): Heuristics and Cues 1. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel t. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185: 1124-31. 2. Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88: 63-76. 3. Kuklinski, James. H., Paul J. Quirk, Jennifer Jerit, and Robert F. Rich. 2001. “The Political Environment and Citizen Competence.” American Journal of Political Science, 45: 410-424. Suggested/Graduate students readings: Bullock, John G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” Ameri- can Political Science Review 105: 496-515. Dancey, Logan and G. Sheagley. 2013. “Heuristics Behaving Badly: Party Cues and Voter Knowledge.” American Journal of Political Science 57: 312-325. Week #7 (February 19): Reading week Week #8 (February 26): Motivated Reasoning, Political Knowledge, and Misin- formation 1. Taber, Charles S. and Milton Lodge. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Polit- ical Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 755-769. 2. Iyengar, Shanto., and Kyu S. Hahn. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59: 19-39. 3. Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.). 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge University Press. Chapter 12: “Political Knowl- edge.” 4. Kuklinski, James H., Paul J. Quirk, Jennifer Jerit, David Schwieder, and Robert F. Rich. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of citizenship.” Journal of Politics 62: 585-598. Suggested/Graduate students readings: Lord, Charles. G., Lee Ross, and Mark R. Lepper. 1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 2098-2109. Cohen, Geoffrey L., Joshua Aronson, and Claude M. Steele. 2000. “When Beliefs Yield to Ev- idence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26: 1151-1164. Taber, Charles S., Damon Cann, and Simona Kucsova. 2009. “The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments.” Political Behavior 31: 137-155. Week #9 (March 4): Media Effects 1. Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.). 2011. Cambridge Hand- book of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge University Press. Chapter 14: “Media and Politics.” 2. Nelson, Thomas E., et al. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” American Political Science Review 91: 567-584. 3. Druckman, James. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing.” American Political Science Review 98: 671-686. Suggested/Graduate students readings: Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211: 453-58. Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101: 637-55. 3 Week #10 (March 11): Racial Priming 1. Gilliam Jr., F. D. and S. Iyengar. 2000. “Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 560-573. 2. Tesler, Michael. 2012. “The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race.” American Journal of Polit- ical Science 56: 690-704. 3. Huber, Gregory A., and John S. Lapinski. 2006. “The ’Race Card’ Revisited: Assessing Racial Priming in Policy Contests.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 421-40. Suggested/Graduate students readings: Mendelberg, Tali. 2008. “Racial Priming Revived.” Perspectives on Politics 6: 109-23. Mendelberg, Tali. 2008. “Racial Priming: Issues in Research Design and Interpretation.” Perspectives on Politics 6: 135-40. Huber, Gregory A., and John S. Lapinski. 2008. “Testing the Implicit-Explicit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reading List for SGR001F Political Psychology, 7.5 Credits, Third Cycle
    READING LIST 1 9 October 2019 Reg. no. U 2019/471 Reading list for SGR001F Political Psychology, 7.5 credits, third cycle The reading list was approved by the vice dean 9 October 2019 and is valid from the autumn semester 2019. Books Huddy, Leonie, David O. Sears and Jack S. Levy (eds.). 2013. Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology: Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press. (Selected chapters, available online) Articles and book chapters Altemeyer, Bob. 2004. Highly dominating, highly authoritarian personalities. The Journal of Social Psychology 144: 421-447. Bäck, Emma A., Hanna Bäck and Holly Knapton. 2015. Group Belongingness and Collective Action: Effects of Need to Belong and Rejection Sensitivity on Willingness to Participate in Protests Activities. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 56: 537-544. Bäck, Hanna and Marc Debus. 2019. When do women speak? A comparative analysis of the role of gender in legislative debates. Political Studies 67 (3): 576-596. Barzegar, Abbas, Shawn Powers and Nagham El Karhili. 2016. Civic Approaches to Confronting Violent Extremism. Sector Recommendations and Best Practices. Georgia University. (59 pages) Borum, Randy. 2011. Radicalization into Violent Extremism I: A Review of Social Science Theories. Journal of Strategic Security 4: 7-36. Borum, Randy. 2011. Radicalization into Violent Extremism II: A Review of Conceptual Models and Empirical Research. Journal of Strategic Security 4: 37-62. Brader, Ted and George E. Marcus. 2013. Emotion and Political Psychology. In Huddy, Leonie, David O. Sears and Jack S. Levy (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology: Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press. Carney, Dana R., John T.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilali, Rezarta -CV-Jan 2021
    Rezarta Bilali CV- 2021 1 Rezarta Bilali, PhD Department of Applied Psychology New York University 246 Greene Street, Kimball Hall, rm 801 New York, NY10003 tel: +1(212)9985155 email: [email protected] ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT 2020- Associate Professor, Psychology and Social Intervention Department of Applied Psychology New York University, USA 2013-2020 Assistant Professor, Psychology and Social Intervention Department of Applied Psychology New York University, USA 2009-2013 Assistant Professor, Department of Conflict Resolution, Human Security, and Global Governance, McCormack Graduate School of Policy Studies University of Massachusetts Boston, Mass. EDUCATION 2009 University of Massachusetts at Amherst PhD Social Psychology Concentration: Psychology of Peace and Violence Minor: Quantitative Methods 2004 Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey MA Conflict Resolution 2001 Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey BA Psychology HONORS/AWARDS 2020 Otto Klineberg Intercultural and International Relations Award, Honorable Mention Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues 2017 Daniel E. Griffiths Award for Outstanding Research New York University – Steinhardt 2017 Goddard Fellowship Award New York University – Steinhardt 2016 Roberta Sigel Early Career Scholar Paper Award International Society for Political Psychology 2014 Michele Alexander Early Career Award APA Division 9, Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues 2014 W. Gabriel Carras Research Award New York University – Steinhardt Rezarta Bilali CV- 2021 2 2010 Outstanding Dissertation Award Finalist The International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology 2010 Unique Honorable Mention for Dissertation Thesis International Society for Political Psychology 2008/2004 Network Supplementary Grant Fellowship Open Society Institute and SOROS Foundation PUBLICATIONS (* denotes student co-authors) Journal Articles (peer reviewed) Ulug, M., Bilali, R., Karasu, M., & Malo, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action: Individual Differences and Dynamic Interactions
    Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action: Individual Differences and Dynamic Interactions Leor Zmigrod1,2,3 & Amit Goldenberg4 Affiliations: 1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 2Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 3Churchill College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 4Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA Contact: Dr Leor Zmigrod, [email protected], +44 7522193934. Paper accepted and in press at Current Directions in Psychological Science. Can be tempo- rarily cited as: Zmigrod, L., & Goldenberg, A. (2020). Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action: Individual Differences and Dynamic Interactions. Current Directions in Psychological Sci- ence. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w3hj6 1 Abstract Who is most likely to join and engage in extreme political action? While traditional theories have focused on situational factors or group identity attributes, an emerging science illustrates that tendencies for extreme political action may also be rooted in individuals’ idiosyncratic cognitive and affective dispositions. This paper synthesizes cutting-edge evidence demonstrating that an individual’s cognitive and affective architecture shape their willingness to support ideological violence. From a cognitive perspective, traits such as cognitive rigidity, slower perceptual strategies, and poorer executive functions are linked to heightened endorsement for ideological violence. From an emotional standpoint, characteristics associated with emotional reactivity and impaired emotional regulation, such as sensation-seeking and impulsivity, can facilitate readiness for extreme political action. The review hones in on the roles of cognitive rigidity and sensation-seeking as traits heightening proclivities for extreme pro-group behavior, and recommends that future research should aim to assess cognition-emotion interactions to reveal different sub-profiles of political actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Operantsissue III, 2017 from the President
    ISSN 2476-0293 OperantsISSUE III, 2017 from the president was recently talking with a researcher in child development. Naturally, I mentioned Skinner. The researcher said, “of course his science works in the lab, but I have to work in the real world.” Scientific principles, I pointed Iout, are universal. Gravity does not work just in a lab. Nor do the laws of operant conditioning. Skinner made his discovery in a lab, but selection by consequences operates with all organisms and in all settings. This issue of Operants illustrates places around the world where behaviorology is “working.” Julie S. Vargas, Ph.D. President, B. F. Skinner Foundation Chinese Traditional Translated by Kiwiya Zhang 最近我与一位儿童发展领域的研究者聊天。很自然地，我提起了Skinner。这位研究者说：“当然他的科学在实验室里说得通，但我却是要在真实 世界里工作。”我指出，科学的原则是具有普遍性的。万有引力不仅仅在实验室里有用，操作制约也是。Skinner在实验室里发现了后效对行为的 作用，但该作用在所有场合、对所有生命体都有效。本期Operants就阐释了行为学在哪些地方“有用”。 Czech Translated by Helena Vadurova Nedávno jsem mluvila s jedním výzkumníkem, který se zabývá vývojem dítěte. Přirozeně jsem zmínila Skinnera. Ten výzkumník mi řekl: „jeho práce samozřejmě funguje v laboratoři, ale já musím pracovat ve skutečném světě.“ Vědecké principy, poznamenala jsem, jsou uni- verzální. Gravitace funguje nejen v laboratoři. Stejné je to se zákony operantního podmiňování. Skinner svůj objev učinil v laboratoři, ale výběr na základě následků funguje u všech organizmů a ve všech prostředích. Toto vydání časopisu Operants představuje různá místa na světě, kde behaviorální věda „funguje“. French Translated by MarieCeline Clemenceau J’ai récemment échangé avec un chercheur dans le développement de l’enfant. Naturellement, j’ai mentionné Skinner. Le chercheur a déclaré: «Bien sûr, sa science fonctionne dans un laboratoire, mais je dois travailler dans le monde réel».
    [Show full text]
  • Voting: a Behavioral Analysis
    Behavior and Social Issues, Volume 6, No. 1, Spring 1996 Voting: A Behavioral Analysis Max Visser University of Twente ABSTRACT: The behavior of voting for a party in an election has important social implications, yet, due to strong mentalistic influences in electoral research, it has rarely been studied from the behavior analytical perspective. In this article a behavioral analysis of voting is presented and a derived behavioral model is empirically tested on data from a Dutch election survey. It is concluded that such an analysis is both theoretically fruitful and empirically relevant. Introduction Of all possible behaviors a person emits in the course of his life, few may have as many implications as the behavior of voting for a party in an election. By casting a vote, the individual person, directly or indirectly, lays down a course of action for parliaments and governments, and, thus, for the sociopolitical and physical organization of the country he or she inhabits. Through elections, leaders have risen to power who dramatically changed the course of world politics and instigated policies affecting the daily lives of millions. While socially relevant, voting behavior seldom has been researched from a behavior analytical perspective (an exception is Lamal & Greenspoon, 1992). For a long time the study of voting has been dominated by normative considerations, ascribing to the average voter a strong sense of rationality with regard to political matters. The first psychological investigations of electoral behavior quickly shattered this optimistic vision, but they replaced it by a form of semi-rationality, according to which the voter's choices at the voting booths are determined by more or less stable set of mental constructs (political beliefs, attitudes, values, etc.) (Visser, 1994a).
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2015 PSYCHOLOGY of POLITICAL
    Fall 2015 PSYCHOLOGY OF POLITICAL BEHAVIOR 790-586 Mondays, 3:00 - 5:40, Hickman 313 Professor: Richard R. Lau Phone: (848) 932-6685 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Tues, 2 - 4, 505 Hickman Hall; and by appointment. To the extent that political scientists study individual political beliefs and behavior, they rely heavily on theories from psychology. Studies of international relations, political culture, public opinion and voting behavior, race, ethnicity and gender, etc., all rely to a greater or lesser extent on some psychological theory of individual behavior. This course looks explicitly at the interface between psychology and politics, especially public opinion and voting behavior (as American politics is the area of politic science I know best). We will occasionally all read applications of political psychology to other subfields, however, and I encourage each of you to explore some of the political psychology literature from other subfields. I have chosen seven broad topic areas in which interesting research is being conducted in political psychology. For each of these seven areas, we will initially spend some class time -- in several cases an entire class period -- obtaining a general overview of psychological theory, and then spend a class or two looking at the research applying those psychological theories to political science. Again, the political science research will generally be in the area of American politics, but the psychology theories we learn should be applicable to research in other areas of political science as well, including certainly all of the subfields in our department. Requirements The course assumes at least a passing acquaintance with research in American politics (as one would learn from the American politics proseminar), comparative politics, international relations, and/or women and politics, as these are the substantive areas of political science which have most strongly utilized ideas and theories from psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology As a Historical Science
    HISTORICAL PSYCHOLOGY 1 PSYCHOLOGY AS A HISTORICAL SCIENCE Michael Muthukrishna Department of Psychological anD Behavioral Science LonDon School of Economics anD Political Science Joseph Henrich Department of Human Evolutionary Biology HarvarD University EdwarD SlingerlanD Department of Asian StuDies University of British Columbia HISTORICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2 Abstract Psychology has traDitionally seen itself as the science of universal human cognition, anD has only recently begun seriously grappling with the issue of cross-cultural variation. Here we argue that the roots of cross-cultural variation often lie in the past. Therefore, to unDerstanD not just the way, but also why psychology varies, we also neeD to grapple with cross-temporal variation. Psychology neeDs to become a historical science. The traces of past human cognition accessible through historical texts anD artifacts can also serve as a valuable, anD yet currently almost completely unutilizeD, source of psychological Data. This data from DeaD minDs opens up a new anD untappeD, highly Diverse subject pool. The cohort effects we measure are a sliver of the temporal variation we shoulD expect over history. We review examples of research that may be classifieD as historical psychology, introDuce sources of Data anD methoDs for analyzing historical Data, explain for the critical role of theory, anD Discuss the variety of ways in which psychologists can aDD historical depth and nuance to their work. Historical psychology is a critical next step towarD becoming a genuinely universal science. Keywords: cultural evolution, cultural psychology, culture, historical Databases, large-scale textual analysis, science-humanities integration Introduction Our psychology is shapeD by our societies (Henrich 2016; Henrich et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Psychology Syllabus
    Special Topics in American Politics Political Psychology Dr. Christopher Weber Department of Political Science Manship School of Mass Communication 204 Stubbs Hall [email protected] 8-6395 Office Hours: Monday 1-4PM (and by appointment) Objective The purpose of this course is to introduce students to historical and contemporary perspectives in political psychology. As a sub-discipline straddling political science and psychology, a thorough understanding of political psychology necessitates theoretical and methodological diversity. Many of the readings in this course will be drawn from social and cognitive psychology, as well as scholarship in political science. This course serves as a foundation for the study of political psychology, especially as it pertains to mass political behavior. What is political psychology? Is it an application of psychological theory to political processes? Is it applied social and cognitive psychology? Or, is political psychology an application of political theory to psychology? The answer to all these is, “yes and no!” Political psychology is the interdisciplinary pursuit of psychological and political questions; it brings together psychological understandings to political questions, as well as exploring how political contexts influence the ways people behave politically. There is a heavy degree of cross-fertilization in political psychology. Psychological theories have been defined and refined after being tested in the political domain. Likewise, how we understand politics and political processes has been influenced by psychological theory. Thus, in order to thoroughly understand the state of political psychology, it is necessary to sample from both historical and contemporary works in both political science and psychology. In this course we will begin with an overview of the field of political psychology and the ways that questions within political psychology have been studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Bulletin
    Political Psychology Section Bulletin December 2019 Welcome to your second issue of the Political Psychology Section Bulletin. You are receiving this as one of almost 200 members who have joined since the Section was approved in November 2019. Thank you so much for your support and participation over the last year and we look forward to seeing you in upcoming events in Birmingham and London, after a busy year which has attracted members to Salford and Harrogate and seen two elections. See inside this issue for news of upcoming events and an exciting winter line up and please get in touch with your ideas for the spring issue. From the Editorial team Pressure on our politicians to perform In this Issue 1. From the Editorial team o, we promised you another We know that even for up to 80 general election! Yes, those who MPs the emotions aroused by the 2. Upcoming events Shave attended the Psychology EU referendum were the tipping of Democracy conference in Salford point which led to their choice to 3. Featured articles from will recall that each time we hold this stand down. While we might expect members Saskia Perriard- biennial event, a general election them to have a more cushioned Abdoh, Steve Myers, takes place in the same year. political afterlife, this is not always Jill Ruddock and the case, especially following the Antigonos Sochos Of course, this has to be psychological battering so many coincidence, doesn’t it? Hmmm… have taken on the tumultuous Brexit 4. Book overview by well, we couldn’t possibly comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Empathy and Political Psychology: Problematic Contributions to Security Issues
    International Bulletin of Political Psychology Volume 4 Issue 5 Article 1 2-2-1998 Empathy and Political Psychology: Problematic Contributions to Security Issues IBPP Editor [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/ibpp Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Other Political Science Commons, and the Other Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Editor, IBPP (1998) "Empathy and Political Psychology: Problematic Contributions to Security Issues," International Bulletin of Political Psychology: Vol. 4 : Iss. 5 , Article 1. Available at: https://commons.erau.edu/ibpp/vol4/iss5/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Bulletin of Political Psychology by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Editor: Empathy and Political Psychology: Problematic Contributions to Security Issues International Bulletin of Political Psychology Title: Empathy and Political Psychology: Problematic Contributions to Security Issues Author: Editor Volume: 4 Issue: 5 Date: 1998-02-06 Keywords: Analysis, Empathy, Intelligence, Operations, Policy Abstract. This article describes potential contributions of the empathy construct to political psychology as well as problems hindering this potential from being realized. In the English language empathy typically denotes identifying with, understanding, or attributing something about oneself to another person.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends. the Omagh Bombing: Ireland and the Psychology of Walls
    International Bulletin of Political Psychology Volume 5 Issue 8 Article 4 8-21-1998 Trends. The Omagh Bombing: Ireland and the Psychology of Walls IBPP Editor [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/ibpp Part of the Other Psychology Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Editor, IBPP (1998) "Trends. The Omagh Bombing: Ireland and the Psychology of Walls," International Bulletin of Political Psychology: Vol. 5 : Iss. 8 , Article 4. Available at: https://commons.erau.edu/ibpp/vol5/iss8/4 This Trends is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Bulletin of Political Psychology by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Editor: Trends. The Omagh Bombing: Ireland and the Psychology of Walls International Bulletin of Political Psychology Title: Trends. The Omagh Bombing: Ireland and the Psychology of Walls Author: Editor Volume: 5 Issue: 8 Date: 1998-08-21 Keywords: Bombing, Northern Ireland, Omagh, Psychological Safety, Psychological Walls In William R. Polk's foreign policy textbook, Neighbors and Strangers, much is made of the origins and roles of walls--literal and figurative--throughout the history of human interaction. Walls can be erected to protect one's assets, to keep out the contaminant influences of others, to facilitate enjoyment and nurturance from immersion in one's own, and even to more safely interact with others from a stable and secure foundation. Polk's analysis is more nuanced and seemingly more congruent with human behavior than the common notion that all walls must to be torn down if violent conflict between, among, and within people is to be minimized and political more efficaciously resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • To the Fringe and Back: Violent Extremism and the Psychology of Deviance
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Jagiellonian Univeristy Repository American Psychologist © 2017 American Psychological Association 2017, Vol. 72, No. 3, 217–230 0003-066X/17/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000091 To the Fringe and Back: Violent Extremism and the Psychology of Deviance Arie W. Kruglanski Katarzyna Jasko University of Maryland, College Park Jagiellonian University Marina Chernikova and Michelle Dugas David Webber University of Maryland, College Park Virginia Commonwealth University We outline a general psychological theory of extremism and apply it to the special case of violent extremism (VE). Extremism is defined as motivated deviance from general behavioral norms and is assumed to stem from a shift from a balanced satisfaction of basic human needs afforded by moderation to a motivational imbalance wherein a given need dominates the others. Because motivational imbalance is difficult to sustain, only few individuals do, rendering extreme behavior relatively rare, hence deviant. Thus, individual dynamics trans- late into social patterns wherein majorities of individuals practice moderation, whereas extremism is the province of the few. Both extremism and moderation require the ability to successfully carry out the activities that these demand. Ability is partially determined by the activities’ difficulty, controllable in part by external agents who promote or oppose extrem- ism. Application of this general framework to VE identifies the specific need that animates it and offers broad guidelines for addressing this pernicious phenomenon. Keywords: violent extremism, deviance, terrorism, motivation Violent extremism (VE) counts among the most vexing the Press Secretary, 2014).
    [Show full text]