Pdf 792.98 K
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.4.1783 Expression of EMSY in Breast Carcinomas RESEARCH ARTICLE Expression of EMSY, a Novel BRCA2-link Protein, is Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis and Increased Tumor Size in Breast Carcinomas Zahra Madjd1, 2*, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari2, Amir Hassan Zarnani3, Maryam Khayamzadeh2, Elham Kalantari1, Nazanin Mojtabavi4* Abstract Background: The EMSY gene encodes a BRCA2-binding partner protein that represses the DNA repair function of BRCA2 in non-hereditary breast cancer. Although amplification ofEMSY gene has been proposed to have prognostic value in breast cancer, no data have been available concerning EMSY tissue expression patterns and its associations with clinicopathological features. Materials and Methods: In the current study, we examined the expression and localization pattern of EMSY protein by immunohistochemistry and assessed its prognostic value in a well-characterized series of 116 unselected breast carcinomas with a mean follow up of 47 months using tissue microarray technique. Results: Immunohistochemical expression of EMSY protein was detected in 76% of primary breast tumors, localized in nuclear (18%), cytoplasmic (35%) or both cytoplasmic and nuclear sites (23%). Univariate analysis revealed a significant positive association betweenEMSY expression and lymph node metastasis (p value=0.045) and larger tumor size (p value=0.027), as well as a non-significant relation with increased risk of recurrence (p value=0.088), whereas no association with patients’ survival (log rank test, p value=0.482), tumor grade or type was observed. Conclusions: Herein, we demonstrated for the first time the immunostaining pattern of EMSY protein in breast tumors. Our data imply that EMSY protein may have impact on clinicipathological parameters and could be considered as a potential target for breast cancer treatment. Keywords: Breast cancer - EMSY - tissue microarray - immunohistochemistry - lymph node metastasis Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15 (4), 1783-1789 Introduction Bane et al., 2011; Mutch et al., 2013). The estimated lifetime risk of breast cancer with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Breast cancer is the most common malignancies among mutation can be as high as 65%-74 % (Mutch et al., 2013). women worldwide, with an increase in incidence from The prevalence of BRCA mutations varies by population: 10.9 to approximately 20 million new cases per year by 0.2 to 0.3 percent in general populations, 3 percent in the year 2020 (Parkin et al., 2001; Lehmann et al., 2011). women with breast cancer, 6 percent in women with breast Breast cancer also ranks first among cancers diagnosed cancer onset before age 40 years, 10 percent in women in Iranian women (Mousavi et al., 2009; Kolahdoozan et with ovarian cancer, and 20 percent in high-risk families al., 2010; Movahedi et al., 2012). (Nelson et al., 2013). Positive family history is a confirmed risk factor for BRCA genes are implicated in RAD 51 and mediate breast cancer, as the risk to first-degree relatives of a case recombinational repair of double stranded DNA breaks, is almost 2 times the population risk (Collaborative group, chromatin remodeling and regulation of transcription 2001). Majority of the familial risk associated with breast (Venkitaraman, 2002; Hughes-Davies et al., 2003). cancer have a genetic origin (Ponder, 2001; Benusiglio et Whereas, familiar breast cancer is the cause of 5% of all al., 2005). breast cancers, sporadic breast cancers account for more Highly penetrate germline mutations in BRCA1 and than 95% of all breast cancer types. Mutations of BRCA1/2 BRCA2 account for the large majority of autosomal genes are frequently observed in hereditary breast and dominant familial breast-ovarian cancer (Bennett, 1999; ovarian cancers, additionally altered expressions of 1Oncopathology Research Center and Dep pathology, Faculty of medicine, 4Department of Immunology, faculty of medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, 2Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 3Nanobiotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran *For correspondence: [email protected], mojtabavi.n@ iums.ac.ir Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 15, 2014 1783 Zahra Madjd et al BRCA1/2 proteins potentiate sporadic forms of breast (either familial or sporadic) of female patients with cancer (Paul and Paul, 2014). primary breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2010 Nevertheless, the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were included in tissue microarrays. Of this, 10 specimens in sporadic breast cancer remains unexplained, since were excluded from the study due to technical problems somatic mutations in both genes are uncommon (Gayther in tissue processing or lack of possible tumor cells within et al., 1998). Silencing of BRCA1 allele through promoter the core, leaving a total of 116 cases for final evaluation. methylation occurs in somatic breast cancer (Dobrovic This collection comprises female patients ranging and Simpfendorfer, 1997), whereas this mechanism of from 30 to 79 years of age (mean=52 years) with a long- transcriptional suppression could not explain the absence term follow-up of 2-180 months (mean=47 months). The of somatic BRCA2 mutations in sporadic cancers (Collins samples were obtained from Cancer Research Centre; et al., 1997). Shohada Hospital affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University The discovery of EMSY in 2003 by Hughes-Davies of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. et al, links the important role of BRCA2 to sporadic The study of prognostic markers in breast tumors was breast-ovarian cancer. EMSY, binds to exon 3 of BRCA2 evaluated based on the REMARK criteria (McShane et and suppresses the transactivity of BRCA2. EMSY is al., 2005). over expressed in sporadic breast and ovarian cancers, Patient characteristics including age, menopausal suggesting that its overexpression may mimic the effects status and family history of breast cancer were procured of BRCA2 inactivation, functionally equivalent to loss and information on absence or presence of recurrence, and of BRCA genes in familial cases (Hughes-Davies et al., survival was also retrieved from a retrospective database. 2003). In addition, since EMSY is a BRCA-2 partner Tumor characteristics, including histological grade, which modulates BRCA-2 function, it can be concluded tumor type (Bloom and Richardson, 1957), tumor size, that EMSY participates in breast cancer development lymph node involvement were collected and recorded in (Livingston, 2004; Yao and Polyak, 2004). a database (Table 1). EMSY localizes to the sites of DNA repair following The tumor grading of all breast cancers were assessed DNA damage and maps to chromosome 11q13.5, 100 kb based on Bloom Richardsons system (Bloom and centromeric to the GARP gene, a locus that is known to be Richardson, 1957) by a team of pathologists including involved in a number of cancers including breast, ovarian two fixed pathologists over these years. and prostate cancers (Nurminen et al., 2011). Recently Information on laboratory tests including Her2, Nurminen et al showed that 11q13.5 contributes to prostate Estrogen Receptor (ER), and Progesterone Receptor cancer predisposition with complex genetic structure and (PR) were also assessed routinely and included in is associated with prostate cancer death (Nurminen et al., database (Table 2). ER and PR status was assessed by 2013). immunohistochemistry (IHC) technique and a cut-off of Amplification of EMSY has been reported in 13% 10% for nuclear staining was used to determine positivity. of sporadic breast cancer, 17% of high grade ovarian The assessment of the HER2 status was done by IHC cancer and 13 % of sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinomas and the results interpreted as positive (3+), negative (0- (Schuuring, 1995; Hughes-Davies et al., 2003; Rodriguez 1+), or equivocal (2+). Only cases with a diffuse intense et al., 2004; Brown et al., 2006; van Hattem et al., 2008). membrane staining pattern in the tumor (scored as 3+) In a recent study conducted by Wilkerson et al, were considered HER2 positive by IHC. amplification of EMSY was found in 10 cancer cell lines All patients received surgery (either modified radical from different anatomical origins including breast, ovary, mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery) which followed pancreas, oesophagus, lung and the oral cavity (Wilkerson by radiotherapy (90%). Patients with lymph node et al., 2011). metastasis even <3 had radiation therapy with at least 2 EMSY amplification has been associated with worse specific fields and patients with 4 or >4 involved lymph survival, particularly in node-negative breast cancers, nodes received at least 3 specific fields radiation therapy suggesting that EMSY may be an indicative of poor plus systemic therapy. outcome of the disease (Hughes-Davies et al., 2003). One hundred and seven (93%) cases received Therefore, EMSY could be a strong candidate oncogene chemotherapy, at least 5 cases received neoadjuvant within 11q13.5 region (Rodriguez et al., 2004). chemotherapy (that for these cases tumor size was not a Based on the absence of any data in the literature significant data due to chemotherapy efficacy), and fewer concerning immunohistochemical analysis of EMSY patients were given hormone therapy (either tamoxifen protein expression in tumor tissues, in this study we aimed or aromatase inhibitors) if ER were positive (Table 2). for the first time to investigate the expression of this This study was approved by Iran University of Medical protein