IDR-31.3-For-Google.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
India’s largest online military newspaper www.indiandefencereview.com ISSN 0970-2512 Jul-Sep 2017, Vol. 32(3) Contents INDIAN FROM THE EDITOR • DOKLAM: INDIA AT AN INFLECTION POINT IN ITS QUEST FOR DEFENCE REGIONAL/GLOBAL POWER STATUS 3 INDIAN DEFENCE REVIEW COMMENT REVIEW DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS: Game Changer Or A Damp Squib? FOREMOST SINCE 1986 • Gp Capt Joseph Noronha 7 ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY: Battlefield Helicopters Gp Capt AK Sachdev 12 SPACE: THE FORCE MULTIPLIER FOR AIR POWER Air Marshal Anil Chopra 19 MIG-35, F-16, GRIPEN OR BETTER CHOICE? EDITOR Sumit Walia 24 Lt Gen JS Bajwa, PhD LOOK LONG, LOOK DEEP ASSOCIATE EDITOR China’s Airborne Warning and Control Systems Priya Tyagi Gp Capt Ravinder Singh Chhatwal 28 Danvir Singh OUR ARMED FORCES: Do We Take Them Seriously? Sanjiv Khanna 33 EDITORIAL CONSULTANTS CHINA’S ‘CONTENTIOUS’ PATH TO WAR? Claude Arpi Anant Mishra 38 Lt Gen Gautam Banerjee BALANCING POLITICS AND POWER Prognosis of China’s Military Build-up Lt Gen Prakash Katoch Lt Gen Gautam Banerjee 44 Gp Capt Balakrishna Menon EMBRACE THE FUTURE OF KASHMIR Air Marshal Narayan Menon Lt Gen Subrata Saha 51 Prakash Nanda RESURGENCE OF ULFA (I) IN ASSAM: Implications for Internal Security Indrajit Sharma & Dr N Mohandas Singh 55 Vice Admiral Rajeshwer Nath NAVAL COMBAT SYSTEMS: Evolution and Future Perspectives Vice Adm BS Randhawa Cmde Arun Kumar 60 Amitabha Roychowdhury AEROSPACE AND DEFENCE NEWS Ramananda Sengupta Priya Tyagi 65 DEEPENING INDIA-ISRAEL TIES Kanwal Sibal Changing Landscape of the Indian Defence Sector Vice Admiral Anup Singh Ketan Salhotra 81 INDO-ISRAEL RELATIONS: Make with India Tamir Eshel 86 STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP WITH PRIVATE PLAYERS: An Overview Danvir Singh 92 PAX BRITANNICA WHITTLED DOWN TO AN ISLAND KINGDOM (Intrigues that Built an Empire: Intrigued by Wheels of History) Lt Gen PG Kamath 97 NORTH KOREA – A DELINQUENT STATE? Air Marshal Dhiraj Kukreja 102 THE OFFSET POLICY- A DECADE IN RETROSPECT Dr SN Misra 108 PAKISTAN FOR BALOCHISTAN, NOT BALOCHIS RSN Singh 113 ARMY’S BATTLEFIELD SUPPORT SYSTEM Fielding Initially Planned by 2017 could take Another Decade Lt Gen Prakash Katoch 117 INDIAN DEFENCEiDR REVIEW CHINA HAS DONE INDIA A FAVOR Dr Amarjit Singh 118 in print every january, april, july and october from new delhi SHEKATKAR COMMITTEE REPORT Genuine ‘Reforms’ or Cosmetic ‘Re-grouping’? for more information, please email us at Gp Capt TP Srivastava 119 [email protected] WHO MADE NORTH KOREA A NUCLEAR POWER? DR A.Q. KHAN? [email protected] Sumit Walia 122 PICTURE PAD Exercise MALABAR Maritime forces from India, Japan, and the United States completed Exercise Malabar 2017, in the Bay of Bengal from 10-17 July 2017. Exercise Malabar began in 1992 and this year marks the 21st rendition of the exercise. The objectives of Malabar 2017 were to improve interoperability between the U.S., Indian and Japanese maritime forces, provide an opportunity to conduct engagements with India and Japan, and demonstrate U.S. naval presence in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region. DAILY ONLINE FROM NEW DELHI www.indiandefencereview.com Contributors may please send their articles, not exceeding 3500 words, in a disk with a hard copy, with suitable illustrations to Editor, Indian Defence Review. The views expressed are the contributors’ own and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review. Publisher: Anuradha Verma, Indian Defence Review, Lancer Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi. Advertising: For information and rates, please contact Manav Randhawa, Director of Marketing or the Publisher. How to reach us: Indian Defence Review, 2/42 (B) Sarvapriya Vihar, New Delhi-110016. +91 11 41759461, 26854691 Telefax +91 11 26960404 [email protected] www.indiandefencereview.com Printed at Sona Printers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. Price: Rs 350 PICTURE PAD 2 INDIAN DEFENCE REVIEW 32.3-Jul/Sep ‘17 FROM THE EDITOR oklam, was an innocuous and routine local initiative by the troops on ground. The Dcommander there felt the need to ensure that the existing Agreements and Treaties between India and China are abided by in letter and spirit. The Chinese road makers were stoutly confronted by this courageous sub-unit of soldiers who stood up to stop any construction in the territory that belonged to Bhutan – despite the Chinese vehemently continuing to claim otherwise. This uncomplicated straightforward DOKLAM military stance taken by India troops has acquired such import that it now signals to the region and the world India at an Inflection Point in its Quest of the time when India transcends into the realm of a for Regional/Global Power Status “great power” to be reckoned with. What India has done displays the Governments ‘steely’ WILL to pursue what it believes and knows is right. Diplomacy, under the sterling leadership of the Minister, has been forthright and firm. Her iteration in the Lok Sabha adequately indicates the sagacity of the government’s actions: “War is not a solution to anything. Even after war, there has to be a dialogue. So, have dialogue without a war... Patience, control on comments and diplomacy can resolve problems,” the minister said. “If patience is lost, there can be provocation on the other side. We will keep patience China has been aggressively to resolve the issue, we will keep engaging with China to persistent in its efforts to make resolve the dispute.” strategic inroads in India’s The Chinese, on their part, have let loose a vitriolic diatribe through their state controlled media showing immediate neighbourhood, themselves in poor light. The world has been watching resulting in India being left with and all of China’s neighbours and supporters around the a constricted space to exercise world must have concluded that in future they should not expect a fair deal from a ‘rising China’ which is given to its influence. such vituperative bluster. It is unworthy to even bother or recount the didactic statements made in the process and that too in the most patronizing tones. In fact, these could be compiled to illustrate the poorest examples of diplomacy and conduct of international relations at all institutions and universities highlighting this aspect of how diplomacy should NEVER be conducted by mature nations. India’s maturity stood out in that it did not choose to reciprocate under the Hammurabi principle of ‘an eye for an eye’ to what was being churned out daily in the Chinese media and by the statements of the spokespersons of the Ministries of Defence and Foreign Affairs. It stood firm on the ground for dialogue. China’s needling continued by provocative intrusions in Barahoti in Uttrakhand sector and Pangong Tso in Ladakh sector. It has even raised a bogus dispute with regard to the western tri- junction of India-Tibet-Nepal. In fact, China contends all tri-junctions along India’s northern boundary: India-Tibet-Myanmar in the Lohit sector of Arunachal Pradesh; Eastern tri-junction of India-Tibet-Bhutan in the Tawang sector; Batang La in the Eastern Sikkim (Doklam); Finger in North Sikkim not far from the Eastern FROM THE EDITOR 32.3-Jul/Sep ‘17 INDIAN DEFENCE REVIEW 3 tri-junction of India-Tibet-Nepal; and now the Western tri-junction of India-Tibet-Nepal in the Kalapani- Lipulekh sector. Capacity and capability building do not, by themselves, constitute a tangible threat. Judging the ‘intention’ of a nation gives the necessary fillip to any notion of a threat. From the above, China’s intentions do indicate a ‘real threat’ to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India. It would be appropriate to say here that the Indian policy of ‘Act East’ has been given flesh by India coming to the aid of Bhutan in Doklam. Earlier, Indian diplomacy had compelled Sri Lanka to modify the terms of its lease of the Hambantota Port with China. However, rash statements by China that if India can come to the aid of Bhutan in Doklam, China can also come to the aid of Pakistan in Kashmir cannot be dismissed as a As a matter of fact by their casual analogy. In the first instance the whole of Jammu claim China has willy-nilly Kashmir and Ladakh is Indian territory and China needs to clear its mistaken notion of it being Pakistani territory. increased the length of the LAC Pakistan, through armed action by irregulars, had come by around 20 km (Batang La- to illegally control a portion of Jammu, Kashmir and Gamochen) and that is a major Ladakh which does not make it Pakistani territory. China Pakistan Economic Corridor passing through the alteration of the status quo. Gilgit-Baltistan region of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh is a violation of Indian sovereignty. So any intervention to assist Pakistan in Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh will be a direct assault on India’s sovereignty. China has been aggressively persistent in its efforts to make strategic inroads in India’s immediate neighbourhood, resulting in India being left with a constricted space to exercise its influence. On the other hand, India has seemingly displayed casualness or may be reticence in doing the same in China’s immediate neighbourhood. This reticence, arguably, stemmed from the lack of confidence in India’s own abilities and India’s obsessive and at times, it’s overly debilitating focus on domestic politics. It is also true that often the smaller countries play ‘hard to get’ to extract the most out of these two large countries contenting for influence. Creditably, today it is the same crop of diplomats doing a stupendous job in building India’s image as a staunch ally in the region. Probably it just required political will, vision and strong leadership at the helm to bring about this transformation.