DOCSLIB.ORG

The Paluxy River Footprint Mystery--Solved. PUB DATE 85 Nr,TE 69P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Paluxy River Footprint Mystery--Solved. PUB DATE 85 Nr,TE 69P DOCUMENT RESUME ED 265 059 SE 046 360 AUTHOR Cole, John R., Ed.; Godfrey, Laurie R., Ed. TITLE The Paluxy River Footprint Mystery--Solved. PUB DATE 85 Nr,TE 69p. AVAILABLE FROM Creation/Evolution Magazine, P.O. Box 146, Amherst Branch, Butfalo, NY 14226-0146 ($2.75; 10 or more, $1.75). PUB TYPE Collected Works - Serials (022)-- Reports - General (140) JOURNAL CIT Creation/Evolution; v5 nl Win 1985 EDRS PRICE 17701 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Creationism; *Evolution; *Paleontology; *Religious Factors; `-cience Education; *Scientific Research ABSTRACT This document points out that creationists claim that humans and dinosaurs Hoed together in Texas just before Noah's flood by citing alleged human footprints found side-by-side with those of dinosaurs in the Cretaceous limestone of the Paluxy Rivernear Glen Rose, Texas. An investigation was conducted to determine if this claim were true. Findings of this investigationare reported and discussed in the papers included in this publication. Theyare: "Tracking Those Incredible Creationists" (R. J. Hastings),an investigative chronology of the Glen Rose creationists excavations from 1982 to the present; "Foot Notes of an Anatomist" (L. R. Godfrey), which examines the human and dinosaur footprints at the site; "Nantracks? The Fossils Say Not" (J. R. Cole, L. R. Godfrey, and S. D. Schafersman); "If I Had a Hammer" and "It Ain't Necessarily So: Giants and Biblical Literalism" (J. R. Cole). It is pointed out that the "mantracks" (the term given by creationists to the elongated channels or depressions found in rock) could have been formed by numerous mechanisms other than human involvement. Three pales of references conclude the document. (JN) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * from the original document. *********************0*******************************4***************** Croatian/Evolution F vlio.affle MIR. Di DIPARTIIIINT Or SOMATIC. NATIONAL INSTITUTE Of EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER IERIC I ITIMdocument his wen tgstpeuese is received from the person or orgenestion oretneeng it Minor changes here bean mode to improve reProductson quality Il Points of *nw or opmems steed in the docu- ment do not aws* represent of hue NM POSIO0o Of poky .... ...hblIO , 46..11.. CONTENTS Vol. 5, No. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE The Paluxy River Footprint Mystery Solved edited by John R. Cole and Laurie R.Godfrey "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE TIll MATERIAL IN MICROFICHE ONI. 1 Introduction HAS BEEN GRANTED BY 5Tracking Those Incredible Creationists OCihn 'h P. e014-.. 16 Foot Notes of an Anatomist 37Mantracks? The Fossils Say No! TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE 46If I Had a Hammer INFORMATION CENTER (ERICL" 48It Ain't Necessarily So: Giants and Biblical Literalism 53References 2 Did humans and dinosaurs live together in Texas just before Noah's Hood? Creationists say they did, supporting this claim by citing alleged human foot- prints that have been found side-by-side with those of dinosaurs in the Creta- ceous limestone of the Pa luxy River near Glen Rose, Texas. But what would a scientific team of noncreafionists conclude? Creation/Evolution wantedto find out, and so it supported the efforts of Dr. Laurie R. Godfrey to gather together such a team, conduct first-hand investigations, andreport the findings. The result is this special issue of Creation/Evolution edited by John R. Cole and Laurie R. Godfrey and authored by the following individuals. JOHN R. COLE ?timed his Ph.D. in anthropology from Columbia University, specializing in archaeology and cultural anthropology. He is executive director of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal and formerly taught at the University of Northern lows and the Univenit) of Massachusettsat Amherst. LAURIE R. GODFREY earned her Harvard Ph.D. in anthropology, specializing in paleontology and anatomy. She i.Associate professor of anthropology at the Uni- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, and M. I. Bunting Science Fellowat Radcliffe- Harvard. RONNIE J. HASTINGS earned his Ph.D. in physics from Texas A & M. Heis chair of the Science Department, Waxahachie, Texas High School, andis a member of the Texas Council :or Science Education. STEVEN D. SCHAFERSMAN earned his Ph.D. ri geology from Rice University, specializing in a..vertebrate paleontology. He is president of the Texas Council for Science Education and is a consulting research geologist in Houston. All have wntten extensively on various topics of the creation/evolutioncontra. veny. CREATIONIEVOLUTION XV (Volume 5, Number 1) ISSN 07366001 Creation/Evolution, a publication dedicated to promoting evolutionary science, is pub fished by the American Humanist Association. However, the views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Association, and the views of the Associa- tion do not necessarily represent the views of the authors. It is published with the following subscription rates: four issues, $9.00; Canadianor Mexican addresses, $10.00; foreign air mail, $15.00. Individual issues, including back issues,are $2.75 each. Funds should be made payable in U.S. money on a U.S. bank. Please send subscription requests, letters, changes of address, requests for informationon reprint tights, article proposals, and other inquiries to CREATION/EVOLUTION P.O. Box 146, Amherst Branch Buffalo, NY 142260146 Edison Frederick Edwords; Associate Edison Philip Osman Contents of this issue are ®1985 by John R. Cole, Laurie R. Godfrey, Ronnie J. Hast- ings, and Steven D. Schafer:man. Cover illustrations 0 1985 by Dorothy Sigler. Figures 5, 7, 12, 16, and the photo on page 4 are 0 1985 by Frederick Edwords. The photo on page 15 is 0 14435 by Richardj L. Tierney. Introduction J.R. Cole, L.R. Godfrey, R.J. Hastings, and S.D. Schafersman When creationist Clifford L. Burdick published in 1950 a short articJ d "When GIANTS Roamed the Earth: Their Fossil Footprints Still in the Seventh Day Adventist periodical Signs 21 the Times, he openeda can of worms still not contained. He brought public attention to an issue that had been fairly local up to that timethe claim that human and dinosaur tracks are found together in the same strata and that the human tracks were made by biblical giants. A. W. McCann (1922), Byron Nelson (1931) aid George McCready Price (1935) had previously revived nineteenth century Seventh Day Adventist "Flood Geology," which claimed vaguely that humans and prehistoric animals had lived together Wore Noah's flood had reshaped the earth about 4800 years ago. However, they lacked the direct evidence that Burdick thought he had found. Burdick was originally inspired by a 1939 Natural History magazine article by Roland T. Bird mentioning the discovery of fake giant human foot- prints from Glen Rose, Texasprints that had been carved in the Cretaceous rock. Burdick began his search for these prints in 1945 and managed to locate them in a small museum in Arizona. Refusing to believe that they were carved, he enthusiastically discussed them with his creationist colleagues. In 1961. photogranin taken by Burdick of the tracks appeared in The Genesis Flood by Whitcomb and Morris. This book, hailed by the creationists themselvesas the watershed of the modern "scientific'. creation movement, helped spread the Paluxy mantrack Following the appearance of The Genesis Flood, individual creationists and creationist teams began visiting the Glen Rosearea looking for new "mantracks" (as they came to be called). Notableamong these was Stanley Taylor who, after a 1968 search, returned in 1970 witha full crew and pro- duced the film Footprints in Stone. This filmgave the mantrack claims an even larger audience and further interest was aroused. As a resuh, the Insti- tute for Creation Researcn began their own explorations in 1975thesame year that Erich Von Diiniken, author of Chariots of the Gods?, senta camera- man from Europe to film the tracks in order to support hisown "ancient astronaut" claims. The latest in this series of investigators is the Reverend Carl Baugh. He began digging sporadically at the McFall site, upriver fromDinosaur Valley 4 CREATION/EVOLUTION XV 2 State Park, in1982.In a1983Bible-Science Association audio tape, Baugh announced his discovery of 44 "human" footprir.ts at the McFall site, some in left-right-left sequences and some stepped on by "Tyrannosaurusrex." Most had eroded or dried out, becoming invisible within an hour o.... so of discovery, thereby making examination by others impossible. (See Table.) TABLE 1 CARL BAUGH'S "MANPRINTS" AT THE McFALL SITE,1983 Number of tracks Average length of tracks Baugh's comments 28 16" an individual 81A feet tall 7 93/4" called "Beverly" because probably a woman 4 12" named "Sir George" after former governor of Fiji 5 22" 13' tall, 600 pounds, flat-footed From such discoveries as these, Baugh concluded that the mantracks were made by people "wading in water, probably searching for clams" between high tides in the "Cambrian" Paluxy area. Then, at high tides, these people returned to temporary safety on the Llano Uplift (Baugh, 1983b), which, incidentally, comprises a distance of about 100 miles each way! Baugh also carelessly attributed all three-toed (theropod or ornithopod) dinosaur prints in the region to Tyrannosaurus and sauropod prints to Bron- tosaurus, indicating perhaps that he was misled by the fiberglass models of Tyrannosaurus and Brontosaurus on display in Dinosaur Valley State Park.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handbook of Texas Cretaceous Fossils
    University of Texas Bulletin No. 2838: October 8, 1928 HANDBOOK OF TEXAS CRETACEOUS FOSSILS B y W. S. ADKINS Bureau of Economic Geology J. A. Udden, Director E. H. Sellards, Associate Director PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY FOUR TIMES A MONTH, AND ENTERED AS SECOND-CLASS MATTER AT THE POSTOFFICE AT AUSTIN, TEXAS. UNDER THE ACT OF AUGUST 24. 1912 The benefits of education and of useful knowledge, generally diffused through a community, are essential to the preservation of a free govern­ m en t. Sam Houston Cultivated mind is the guardian genius of democracy. It is the only dictator that freemen acknowl­ edge and the only security that free­ men desire. Mirabeau В. Lamar CONTENTS P age Introduction __________________________________________________ 5 Summary of Formation Nomenclature_______________________ 6 Zone Markers and Correlation_______________________________ 8 Types of Texas Cretaceous Fossils___________________________ 36 Bibliography ________________________________________________ 39 L ist and Description of Species_________________________________ 46 P lants ______________________________________________________ 46 Thallophytes ______________________________________________ 46 Fungi __________________________________________________ 46 Algae __________________________________________________ 47 Pteridophytes ____________________________________________ 47 Filices __________________________________________________ 47 Spermatophytes __________________________________________ 47 Gymnospermae _________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 307: Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (4/9/2008)
    Revisions to §307 - Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (updated November 12, 2009) EPA has not approved the revised definition of “surface water in the state” in the TX WQS, which includes an area out 10.36 miles into the Gulf of Mexico. Under the CWA, Texas does not have jurisdiction to regulate water standards more than three miles from the coast. Therefore, EPA’s approval of the items in the enclosure recognizes the state’s authority under the CWA out to three miles in the Gulf of Mexico, but does not extend past that point. Beyond three miles, EPA retains authority for CWA purposes EPA’s approval also does not include the application the TX WQS for the portions of the Red River and Lake Texoma that are located within the state of Oklahoma. Finally, EPA is not approving the TX WQS for those waters or portions of waters located in Indian Country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. The following sections have been approved by EPA and are therefore effective for CWA purposes: • §307.1. General Policy Statement • §307.2. Description of Standards • §307.3. Definitions and Abbreviations (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.4. General Criteria • §307.5. Antidegradation • §307.6. Toxic Materials. (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.7. Site-specific Uses and Criteria (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.8. Application of Standards • §307.9. Determination of Standards Attainment • Appendix C - Segment Descriptions • Appendix D - Site-specific Receiving Water Assessments The following sections have been partially approved by EPA: • Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetic Resources
    APOLOGETIC RESOURCES A Young Earth ministry perspective, namely contrasting Scripture to true science now and during the ages. By Dr. Jim Pagels [email protected] 9/2016 Editor Dr. John Fricke, Emeritus Professor of Biology, Concordia University, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Copyright This book is offered as an educational resource on a no cost basis. Contents are not to be reproduced for the purpose of sale. Note that all Scriptural passages are taken from the English Standard Version. 1 I HAVE NO GREATER JOY THAN TO HEAR THAT MY CHILDREN WALK IN THE TRUTH III JOHN 1:4 Forward - Although there is much young Earth information available from commercial sources and on the internet, it was the impression of this writer that no resource that deals with basic topical issues correlating the young Earth philosophy and science exists for professional church workers. To this end, Apologetic Resources is being offered. Intended Audience – The intended audience of this reference material is primarily use by professional church workers, i.e., teachers, pastors, youth workers, etc., namely those who choose to uphold the literal interpretation of Genesis and the inerrancy of Holy Scripture. The focus in this regard is Young Earth Creationism and the catastrophic nature of the global Genesis Flood keeping in mind that Genesis 1-11 is foundational to most of the significant doctrines of Holy Scripture. Of course, laymen may well also find this reference a valuable resource. There is obviously a realistic interplay between Scripture, apologetics and true science. The goal of this document is to provide clarity to this interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names Describing Fossils in Oral Traditions
    Place names describing fossils in oral traditions ADRIENNE MAYOR Classics Department, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305 (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: Folk explanations of notable geological features, including fossils, are found around the world. Observations of fossil exposures (bones, footprints, etc.) led to place names for rivers, mountains, valleys, mounds, caves, springs, tracks, and other geological and palaeonto- logical sites. Some names describe prehistoric remains and/or refer to traditional interpretations of fossils. This paper presents case studies of fossil-related place names in ancient and modern Europe and China, and Native American examples in Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Evidence for the earliest known fossil-related place names comes from ancient Greco-Roman and Chinese literature. The earliest documented fossil-related place name in the New World was preserved in a written text by the Spanish in the sixteenth century. In many instances, fossil geonames are purely descriptive; in others, however, the mythology about a specific fossil locality survives along with the name; in still other cases the geomythology is suggested by recorded traditions about similar palaeontological phenomena. The antiquity and continuity of some fossil-related place names shows that people had observed and speculated about miner- alized traces of extinct life forms long before modern scientific investigations. Traditional place names can reveal heretofore unknown geomyths as well as new geologically-important sites. Traditional folk names for geological features in the Named fossil sites in classical antiquity landscape commonly refer to mythological or and modern Greece legendary stories that accounted for them (Vitaliano 1973). Landmarks notable for conspicuous fossils Evidence for the practice of naming specific fossil have been named descriptively or mythologically locales can be found in classical antiquity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Creation-Evolution Debate in Public Life
    MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART (Under the Direction of Edward Panetta) ABSTRACT Evolution versus creation is a divisive issue as religion is pitted against science in public discourse. Despite mounting scientific evidence in favor of evolution and legal decisions against the teaching of creationism in public schools, the number of advocates who still argue for creationist teaching in the science curriculum of public schools remains quite large. Public debates have played a key role in the creationist movement, and this study examines public debates between creationists and evolutionists over thirty years to track trends and analyze differences in arguments and political style in an attempt to better understand why creationism remains salient with many in the American public. INDEX WORDS: Creation; Evolution; Public Debate; Argumentation; Political Style; Bill Nye MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART B.A., The University of Georgia, 2010 B.S.F.R., The University of Georgia, 2010 M.A.T., The University of Georgia, 2014 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2016 © 2016 Andrew Judson Hart All Rights Reserved MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART Major Professor: Edward Panetta Committee: Barbara Biesecker Thomas Lessl Electronic Version Approved: Suzanne Barbour Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2016 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without Dr. Ed Panetta pushing me down the path to study the creation-evolution debates and his work with me on this through the many drafts and edits.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Summary Report Mapping Conventions for Texas PI and Draft
    .. ,Field summary Report-Mapping Conventions for Texas PI and Draft Project Date of field trip: 1/12-1/16/87 Personnel: Warren Hagenbuck USFWS Curtis Carley USFWS Frank Spague SCS Frank J. sargent Martel Lynn Ashby Hartel 1:100,000 Hap Names: Sherman NW (16 quads), SW; Dallas NW, SW Co~lateral Data: USGS topographical quads- 1:24,100, 1:250,000 SOil survey for all maps where available. Rainfall data for all maps where available. Photography The CrR photography being used is produced by NHAP at a scale of 1:58,000 with flight dates of.september to December 1981. The quality \. is good for both resolution and emulsion. Climate conditions at the time of photography appear to be typical. All photo signatures reviewed during field reconnaissance reflect emulsion and resolution qualities consistently throughout the project area. ".Ecoregion and Physiography '. The project area is located· primarily within the Prairie Parkland Province, oak-Bluestem Sec-l:ion. This region is characterized by 23" to 40" of precipitation annually-with yearly average temperatures between e 47-F-83 F. ~he topography of the maps' northern and eastern sections are comprised of irregular plains (gently rolling) wiu{ relief upwards of 100-300 feet. In the remaining western half of the work area the relief may vary from 300-500 feet with tableland features. Within this western section , in the very southwest corner of Dallas SW, is the Prairie Bushland Province, Juniper-Oak-MesquitJ Section. / The Prairie Bushland Province also has an ar~a of irregUlar plains, yet the relief is 300-500' in elevation.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation Evidences Museum in Glen Rose, and Director of International Expeditions Looking for Living Dinosaurs
    DR. BAUGH, CREATION IN SYMPHONY Tape 1, Sessions 1 & 2 Creation in Symphony: THE EVIDENCE Session 1 Evolution Won’t Work (voice - intro) 150 years ago the theory of evolution found reception in the mind of western man. It was not a new idea. It had been introduced in religious political documents in ancient Babylon, and later in secular contemplations of developing Greece. Erasmus Darwin came up with the idea of natural selection as a mechanism for evolution. His grandson, Charles, introduced the concept to the secular academic community, which was eager to embrace a non-theistic doctrine. This doctrine removed the need for a Creator in the natural world, and the need for accountability in the spiritual world. The text of this video series shows that evolution does not work in theory, or in laboratory research. The evidence is heavily in favor of special creation. In this series of lectures a complete Creation model has been developed, with extensive technical references. Prepare to have your mind dramatically expanded, and your faith academically justified, as our speaker, Dr. Carl Baugh, takes you on a fascinating journey from the microscopic to the galactic. Discover creation in symphony. (Baugh) Hello, I’m Carl Baugh, director of Creation Evidences Museum in Glen Rose, and director of international expeditions looking for living dinosaurs. Welcome to the discussion today. We’re going to discuss very intimate questions, which have to do with your past, your present and your future, and that of all of mankind. We’re going to talk about dinosaurs. Tyrannosaurus Rex. Pachycephalosaurus.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Law Review Volume 83 Issue 1 2005 Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution Matthew J. Brauer Princeton University Barbara Forrest Southeastern Louisiana University Steven G. Gey Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Religion Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew J. Brauer, Barbara Forrest, and Steven G. Gey, Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution, 83 WASH. U. L. Q. 1 (2005). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol83/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Quarterly VOLUME 83 NUMBER 1 2005 IS IT SCIENCE YET?: INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM AND THE CONSTITUTION MATTHEW J. BRAUER BARBARA FORREST STEVEN G. GEY* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Creation/Evolution
    Creation/Evolution Are the fossils in the wrong order for human evolution? Issue VIII CONTENTS Spring 1982 ARTICLES 1 Charles Darwin: A Centennial Tribute by H. lames Birx 11 Kelvin Was Not a Creationist by Stephen G Brush 14 Are There Human Fossils in the "Wrong Place" for Evolution by Ernest C. Conrad 23 Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon-14 Dating by Christopher Gregory Weber REPORTS .30 Creation-Evoiution Debates: Who's Winning Them Now? by Frederick Edwards 43 News Briefs LICENSED TO UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED FORTHCOMING PROGRAMS PBS TV Program, "Creation vs. Evolution: Battle in the Classroom," airing Wednesday, July 7, at 9:00 PM Eastern time. This sixty-minute documentary ex- plores the growing war of litigation over creationism in the public schools with interviews of teachers, scientists, religious, and political leaders, students, and parents in the forefront of the battle. The program particularly examines the "two-model" approach used recently in Livermore, California, and gets the reac- tions of the principal individuals involved. The basic ideas of creationism and evolution are argued in a "point-counterpoint" segment between Duane Gish and Russell Doolittle. The age of the earth and universe are covered. Other per- sonalities featured include: Tim LaHaye; James Robison; Richard Bliss; Nell, Kelly, and Casey Segraves; John N. Moore; Bill Keith; and even Ronald Reagan. A featured representative on the evolution side is William V. Mayer. The docu- mentary is a production of KPBS, San Diego. 1982 Annual Fellows' Meeting at Guilford College, August 8-13, Greensboro, North Carolina. Of the sixteen programs, one is entitled "Religion and Science: The Creationist Debate." Contact John O.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosopher Massimo Pigliucci the Graduate Center at the City University of New York, [email protected]
    Iowa State University Summer Symposium on 2012: Between Scientists & Citizens Science Communication Jan 1st, 12:00 AM Keynote Address—Nonsense on Stilts about Science: Field Adventures of a Scientist- Philosopher Massimo Pigliucci The Graduate Center at the City University of New York, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/sciencecommunication Part of the Other Rhetoric and Composition Commons, Rhetoric Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Pigliucci, Massimo (2012). Keynote Address—Nonsense on Stilts about Science: Field Adventures of a Scientist- Philosopher. Jean Goodwin (Ed.), Between Scientists & Citizens. https://doi.org/10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-112 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Symposia at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Iowa State University Summer Symposium on Science Communication by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Keynote Address Nonsense on Stilts about Science: Field Adventures of a Scientist- Philosopher MASSIMO PIGLIUCCI Philosophy Program, The Graduate Center at the City University of New York 365 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10036 USA [email protected] ABSTRACT: Public discussions of science are often marred by two pernicious phenomena: a widespread rejection of scientific findings (e.g., the reality of anthropogenic climate change, the conclusion that vaccines do not cause autism, or the validity of evolutionary theory), coupled with an equally common acceptance of pseudoscientific notions (e.g., homeopathy, psychic readings, telepathy, tall tales about alien abductions, and so forth).
    [Show full text]
  • CREATION SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Ray Mondragon (10/17, Rev 4/19)
    CREATION SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Ray Mondragon (10/17, rev 4/19) Note: This bibliography contains mainly the books that refute the evolution worldview and support the creationist young-universe view. There are only a few books from the old-universe view as noted at the end. CREATION vs. EVOLUTION Scientific Creationism, edited by Henry M. Morris, Institute for Creation Research, Master Books, 1974. Over 22 scientists with PhDs contribute a variety of scientific evidence supporting the creation view. Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth?, Jonathan Wells, Regnery Publishing, 2000. The main evidence supporting the theory of evolution, “icons,” are explained and effectively refuted. The Lie: Evolution, Ken Ham, Master Books, 1987. The theory of evolution is refuted more philosophically than evidentially for a general audience. Biblical Creationism: What Each Book of the Bible Teaches about Creation and the Flood, Henry Morris, Baker Book House, 1993. The entire Bible is surveyed for passages referring to creation or God as Creator. Man’s Origin, Man’s Destiny: A Critical Survey of the Principles of Evolution and Christianity, A. E. Wilder-Smith, Bethany Fellowship, Inc., 1975. A professor with PhDs in organic chemistry and medical science supports the creationist position from both science and Scripture. This is an older but still a useful work. * The Creation of Life: A Cybernetic Approach To Evolution. A. E. Wilder Smith. Older but very valuable work by a British scholar who has a Ph,D in organic chemistry, a Doctor of Science in Pharmaceuticals from the University of Geneva, and a third doctorate from the E. T. M.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurian Tracks and Related Geological Features of the Reddell Point­–Entrance Point Area, Broome, Western Australia
    DINOSAURIAN TRACKS AND RELATED GEOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE REDDELL POINT –ENTRANCE POINT AREA, BROOME, WESTERN AUSTRALIA PALAEONTOLOGICAL SURVEY AS PART OF THE 2018 BROOME SAFE BOAT HARBOUR SITE ASSESSMENT PROCESS STEVEN W. SALISBURY & ANTHONY ROMILIO School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 September 2018 Salisbury, S. W. and Romilio, A. 2018. Dinosaurian tracks and related geological features of the Reddell Point—Entrance Point area, Broome, Western Australia; palaeontological survey as part of the 2018 Broome Safe Boat Harbour site assessment process. viii + 42p. On the front cover: A partial sauropod trackway in exposures of Broome Sandstone on Reddell Point Beach. © Steven Salisbury On the back cover: A theropod dinosaur track (Megalosauropus broomensis) © Damian Kelly i CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................iii Glossary .....................................................iv Executive summary ......................................vi 1. Introduction Background ................................................ 1 National Heritage Listed dinosaurian Cultural significance ................................... 2 tracks of the Reddell Point— Entrance Point Area .................................. 17 Proposal for a Safe Boat Harbour facility on Reddell Point Beach .............................. 3 Main track types .................................. 17 Objectives of the survey ............................. 3 Additional comments on each of the survey zones (A–G; Fig. 8) .................
    [Show full text]