DOCSLIB.ORG

Observations on the Early Bronze Age Strata of Tel Erani

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Observations on the Early Bronze Age Strata of Tel Erani OBSERVATIONS ON THE EARLY BRONZE AGE STRATA OF TEL ERANI Baruch BRANDL Israel Department of Antiquities and Museums, Jerusalem Dedicated to the memories . \ of Prof. Shmue1 Yeivin, Mr. Shalom Levy and Ms. Ephrat Yeivin Despite their great importance, the Tel Erani excavations have only been fragmentarily and haphazardly published 1. But since Erani is central to any argument concerning the Early Bronze Age in Canaan, and particularly with regard to the relations of Egypt and Canaan during that period, scholars have been forced to resort to the existing fragmentary published material. Various attempts have been made to reconcile stratigraphic, typological and chronological difficulties. Most recently, Weinstein (1984) has contributed substantially with his synthetic study of the implications of Erani for Egyp~-Canaan relations. With the passing away of Prof. Yeivin, Mr. Levy and Ms. Yeivin, the task of preparing the final report of the Tel Erani excavations of 1956-1961 was suggested to the present writer 2. This colloquium represents the first time that primary results and conclusions of this work are presented in public. The following discussion is based on both old publications and a partial examination of the material itself and will focus on four main topics: - the cultural and chronological milieu i - the beginnings of urbanization at Erani i 1. See below the list of publications of the excavators s. Yeivin, E. & s. Yeivin, and G. Ciasca. 2. I would like to thank Mr. Abraham Eitan, director of the Israel Department of Antiquities and Museums (!DAM), and Dr. Ze'ev Yeivin for offering me the task of preparing the final excavation report and for permission to make this presentation. The generous assistence of other colleagues in IDAM should also be acknowledged, particularly that of Mrs. Varda Sussman, Curator, and of Mrs. Zila Sagiv and Mrs. Gara Amit for supplying photographic services. Special thanks are due to Mr; David Ilan for translating and editing the manUscript and for his fruitful comments, to Dr. Benjamin Sass for his valuable remarks on the draft, and to Ms. Ruchama Bonfil for drawing some of the objects and correcting a few of the original drawings. All drawings and photos are by courtesy of !DAM, unless otherwise noted. -357 - BARUCH BRAND!. FIG . 1. - Aerial photograph ofTel Erani taken in 1959. View to the West. FIG 2. - Aerial photograph ofTel Erani taken in 1959. View to the South. - 358- OBSERVATIONS ON TIlE EARLY BRONZE AGE STRATA OF TEL ERANI FIG. 3. - Te1 Erani, the excavation areas of the 1956-1960 seasons (Yeivin 1960d : fig: 1). - Egyptian-Canaanite relations (as reflected especially by the large quantities of Egyptian pottery) ; - the question of the fortifications: their date and character. Each one of these subjects will be dealt with in the following order: S. Yeivin's interpretations, the other expedition members' opinIons (when expressed), other scholars suggestions, and finally my own. Wherever necessary, illustrative material has been included, some of which has been corrected or adapted. It must be emphasized· that the interpretations offered here are only preliminary and may change somewhat with further study. -359 - BARUOI BRANDL Chronology The large number of preliminary notes and articles published by Yeivin include an almost bewildering variety of chronologies. In particular, he repeatedly changed the chronological or cultural attributions of various strata in Area D. To complicate matters further, various scholars have attempted to reconcile contradictions and have suggested alternative schemes of their own. In order to make things clear it is worth tracing the development in Yeivin's and others' stratigraphic analyses and chronologies. At the end of this section, I will propose my own scheme to summarize the site's stratigraphy. Yeivin IS interpretations (a) In the first season of excavation at Tel Erani seven strata were recognized in Area D, ranging from the late Chalcolithic to the Early Bronze Age (Yeivin 1956: 259). (b) By the second season it was supposed that the two uppermost strata were EB II, and that the second stratum included five phases. An EB I stratum was also discerned at this time (Yeivin 1957: 264). (c) In another description of the results of the second season, Yeivin (1958b: 245) indicated that the two upper strata contained EB I and EB II material. (d) In are report following the third season, by which time eleven of the final twelve strata had been uncovered, the followingstratigraphy was given (Yeivin 1958c: 275): Strata I-II - EB 11 StratUm III EB I Strata IV-XI Chalcolithic (e) In the fourth season virgin soil was encountered and 13 strata determined (Yeivin 1959 : 270), but Stratum XIII was subsequently cancelled (Yeivin 1960d : 194). (f) In the preliminary report of the first three seasons (compiled in 1958 but published in 1961), Stratum IV was said to represent the transition from the Chalcolithic to the Early Bronze (Yeivin 1961a : 8). (g) In another publication dealing with the first three seasons of excavation at Erani (also published some years after its writing), other strata were also attributed to this transitional stage: Stratum V and perhaps Stratum VI (Yeivin 1960a : 16). (h) Following the fourth season Stratum VI was removed from the transitional stage. I:Iere is Yeivin's (1960b: 394) stratigraphic interpretation after the fourth season: Strata I-II EBH Stratum III EB I Strata IV-V Chalcolithic - EB transition Strata VI-XII Chalcolithic (i) The Chalcolithic strata were assigned to the Late Chalcolithic period in the preliminary report (Yeivin 1961a : 8, but written in 1958). (j) Elsewhere, StratumXII was called Middle Chalcolithic and the other strata of that period were said to be contemporary with the Ghassulian...;Beersheva stage but to belong to another culture (Yeivin 196Od: 193-194,198; 1965: 355) . .,360 - OBSERVATIONS ON TIffi EARLY BRONZE AGE STRATA OF TEL ERANI (k) In a 1965 lecture Yeivin (1967b: 45, 48 n. 30) proposed Stratum V to be Egyptian and remarked the presence of EB III sherds in Stratum I 3. (l) In preparing the entry on Tel Erani for the Encyclopedia of Excavations in the Holy Land Yeivin seems to have been influenced by Hennessy (see below) when dealing with the upper strata: - the EB III was relegated to the uppermost phase of Stratum I and called Phase 0 (Yeivin 1970: 597; 1979: 341 n. 10) ; - Stratum IV - previously belonging to the Chalcolithic/EB I transitional phase - moved to the end of the EB I (Yeivin 1970 : 598; 1975: 95) ; - thus Yeivin seems to have dated Stratum III to EB 11, in contrast to the view he expressed until 1967, that Stratum III was EB I (Yeivin 1967b: 48). Yeivin's (1970) final proposal took the following form: Stratum I (Phase 0) EB III Strata I-Ill EB II Stratum IV endofEB I Stratum V Egyptian Strata VI-XII Chalcolithic The interpretations of other expedition members Different views were held by three other members of the Erani staff. These were never published but were later cited by other scholars: • Z. Yeivin (in Ben-Tor 1969 : 3) : Stratum VI Late Chalcolithic/ early EB I Strata V-IV first half of EB I Stratum III second half of EB I Stratum II first half of EB II Stratum I second half of EB 11 • Sh. Levi (in Ben-Tor 1969: 3) : Stratum VI Post-Ghassulian Chalcolithic Stratum V Egyptian material including the Narmer serekh Strata IV-Ill EB I Strata 11-1 second half of EB 11 (following a gap in the first half of the EBII) • E. Yeivin (in Gophna 1972: 51 n.21) • Stratum IV EB II Other scholars suggestions As mentioned above, a number of scholars have entered the foray and made alternative suggestions but part of their conclusions were based on insufficient and confused primary data. 3. This innovation was probably induced by the doctoral dissertations of Hennessy and BeI)-Tor. Hennessy (1967: 14 n. 53,22 nn. 130-131,23 n. 153,72 n. 61, pIs. 13: 1, 7, 60: 1) had dated the combed jars and Kenyon's A3a type bowl to the EB III, and Ben-Tor described one bowl of the Khirbet Kerak family (Ben-Tor 1969: 3,96,105[7], fig. 13 : 5 [our corrected Fig. 8 : 1]). - 361- BARUCH BRANDL \J ~ ~ ~ ~ IJ ~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 '---~ i ;~ " ... -.... -# ..: (;:---2; ~ ' .. ::-- ... 8 10 cm 9 FIG. 4. - Chalcolithic pottery from various strata in Area D. 2 3 6 6Il?t\\ ~V 4 5 7 8 10cm 9 FIG. 5. - Pottery from an early phase of the Early Bronze Age I, from Area D. - 362- OBSERVATIONS ON TIlE EARLY BRONZE AGE STRATA OF TEL ERANI 2 3 4 ( , 5 6 7 8 10cm FIG. 6. - Early Bronze Age III pottery from Stratum I in Area D. - 363- BARUCH BRANDL • Hennessy (1967 : 9 n. 25, 13 n. 43,14 n. 53,16 n. 65, 21 chart 1) We have already indicated that J.B. Hennessy was the first to do so; here is his stratigraphic interpretation: Stratum I EB III Strata I-Ill EB 11 Stratum IV EB I (Kenyon's terminology) Strata V-XII . Proto-Urban • Ben-Tor (1969 : 3) Stratum V the city.with the most abundant Egyptian material Strata IV.,.I11 EB I Strata 11-1 " EB 11 But in a summary table at the end of the above study, the author presented a somewhat different scheme (Ben-Tor 1969 : 155): Stratum V EB I Strata IV-I1 EB 11 Stratum I '. EB 11 > EB III (?) • Miroschedji (1971 : 63il:. 75,74, 79-80 n. 51, figs. 21-23) :) Strata XI-IX ghassoulien final, contemporary with the northern epoque pre-urbaine, phase 1 Strata XI-VIII epoque pre-urbaine, phase 2 Strata VII-VI epoque pre-urbaine, phase 3 • Gophna (1974: 121-128, 151, 153): Strata XII-IX Early EB I Strata VIII-V Late EB I Strata IV-I EB 11 Stratum I :{partially) EB III • Miroschedji (1976: 20 n.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ashqelon, Afridar Area O-2: Early Bronze Age IA Remains
    Ḥadashot Arkheologiyot— Excavations and Surveys in Israel 132 Ashqelon, Afridar Area O-2: Early Bronze Age IA Remains Amir Golani and Martin David Pasternak Introduction The excavation was situated within the confines of the Early Bronze Age I settlement of Ashqelon, which extends over a long strip along the coast (length c. 5 km, width 1–2 km; Fig. 1), from Tel Ashqelon in the south to the Barne‘a neighborhood in the north. The present excavation (Area O-2; map ref. 158173–186/620789–918) is one of many that have revealed remains of the EB I occupation in this region (Fig. 1; Golani 2019:9, Table 1.2).1 Within this area, a non-nucleated settlement appears to have existed for almost a millennium. Material culture studies and radiocarbon dating have dated the beginning of this occupation to 3800/3700 BCE, and the abandonment of the settlement to 2900/2800 BCE (Golani 2013: Fig. 2). The ancient topography of the immediate vicinity of the site has been drastically altered due to the ongoing buildup of sand dunes over the last two millennia and the extensive leveling operations of modern development. At the time of the EB I settlement, two long, wide and low kurkar ridges ran parallel to the coastline. In the shallow trough between these ridges, a distinct ecosystem was created, whereby fertile soils and a high water-table created optimal conditions for habitation (Gophna 1997). The position of the ancient settlement, adjacent to the coast, suggests the possible existence of a nearby anchorage. A wide passage in the sand dunes to the east, facilitating access from the inland to the coast, posits the site as a convenient spot for overland and maritime trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Pyramids Oi.Uchicago.Edu
    oi.uchicago.edu Before the pyramids oi.uchicago.edu before the pyramids baked clay, squat, round-bottomed, ledge rim jar. 12.3 x 14.9 cm. Naqada iiC. oim e26239 (photo by anna ressman) 2 oi.uchicago.edu Before the pyramids the origins of egyptian civilization edited by emily teeter oriental institute museum puBlications 33 the oriental institute of the university of chicago oi.uchicago.edu Library of Congress Control Number: 2011922920 ISBN-10: 1-885923-82-1 ISBN-13: 978-1-885923-82-0 © 2011 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2011. Printed in the United States of America. The Oriental Institute, Chicago This volume has been published in conjunction with the exhibition Before the Pyramids: The Origins of Egyptian Civilization March 28–December 31, 2011 Oriental Institute Museum Publications 33 Series Editors Leslie Schramer and Thomas G. Urban Rebecca Cain and Michael Lavoie assisted in the production of this volume. Published by The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 1155 East 58th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 USA oi.uchicago.edu For Tom and Linda Illustration Credits Front cover illustration: Painted vessel (Catalog No. 2). Cover design by Brian Zimerle Catalog Nos. 1–79, 82–129: Photos by Anna Ressman Catalog Nos. 80–81: Courtesy of the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford Printed by M&G Graphics, Chicago, Illinois. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Service — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984 ∞ oi.uchicago.edu book title TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword. Gil J.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Egyptian-Levantine Connections: New Evidence for Early Bronze Age Fortifications and Some Preliminary Results of an Initial Se
    2 Egyptian-Levantine Connections: New evidence for Early Bronze Age Fortifications and Some Preliminary Results of an Initial Season of Investigations at Tel Erani, Israel Krzysztof M. Ciałowicz, Yuval Yekutieli, Joanna Dębowska-Ludwin, Karolina Rosińska-Balik, Omer Shalev and Michał Wasilewski Introduction This paper briefly outlines the results of the Israeli-Polish excavations at Tel Erani, Areas D3 and N3 (Fig. 2.1) in 2013, and its major preliminary discoveries. Located on the outskirts of Qiryat Gat, Israel, this large tell is the site of one of the most important Early Bronze Age occupations in the southern Levant. Known for having yielded significant evidence of an Early Bronze Age I occupation (c. 3700–2950 BC; Yekutieli 2007, 66) with many Egyptian remains from the late predynastic period (c. 3150–2950 BCE, Brandl 1989; Yeivin 1960a), it has also yielded remains of Early Bronze II (c. 2950–2800 BCE) and Early Bronze III settlements (c. 2800–2500 BC). This multi-season project, which plans to review and synchronise newly unearthed deposits with those of earlier excavations, hopes to achieve a holistic overview of the site and the history of its earlier occupations, effectively dating them and determining the significance of the material culture they yield. Excavation has yielded important information about a fortification first discovered in the last century in Area N (Brandl 1989; Yeivin 1960a; Yeivin and Kempinski 1993). In addition, results of a geomorphological survey of the site’s vicinity offer insights into available resources for its inhabitants, while preliminary analyses of a portion of the pottery assemblage and of a stone mace head offer early insights into what future work at the site may produce.
    [Show full text]
  • A Demographic Analysis of Late Bronze Age Canaan: Ancient
    i A DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF LATE BRONZE AGE CANAAN: ANCIENT POPULATION ESTIMATES AND INSIGHTS THROUGH ARCHAEOLOGY by Titus Michael Kennedy 4812-032-4 Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY in the subject BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Supervisor: PROF COENRAAD SCHEEPERS Co-supervisor: DR SHIMON GIBSON 2013 ii I declare that: A DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF LATE BRONZE AGE CANAAN: ANCIENT POPULATION ESTIMATES AND INSIGHTS THROUGH ARCHAEOLOGY is my own original and unaided work that has not been submitted to any other institution for assessment purposes. All sources and references have been acknowledged. Titus Michael Kennedy UNISA Student # 48120324 September 26, 2013 __________________ ___________________ SIGNATURE DATE iii ABSTRACT A Demographic Analysis of Late Bronze Age Canaan: Ancient Population Estimates and Insights through Archaeology by Titus Michael Kennedy This thesis is a demographic analysis of Late Bronze Age Canaan (ca. 1550/1500-1200/1150 BCE), undertaken through the use of archaeological and anthropological data. The purpose is to establish estimates for the settlement population, nomadic population, nuclear family size, house size, sex ratio, and life expectancy of the people of Canaan during the Late Bronze Age. Previous studies have not addressed these issues in detail, nor had data from the entire scope of Canaan been considered, nor had a precise methodology been developed or used for estimating specific settlement populations and nomadic populations for Canaan during the Late Bronze Age. Thus, additional aspects of the thesis include the development and use of a new methodology for estimating ancient populations and a database of all of the Late Bronze Age sites in Canaan—both archaeological and textual.
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations to the 2020 SBL Travel Award Recipients
    Congratulations to the 2020 SBL Travel Award Recipients Erin Martine Sessions is the recipient of the inaugural Australian College of Theology Female Candidate Scholarship and is working towards her PhD on Song of Songs as a model for the primary prevention of Domestic and Family Violence. She is a lecturer in Integrative Studies at Excelsia College, Sydney, and is an Associate of Common Grace. Erin is an errant poet, arrant academic, and was recently longlisted for the Paraclete Poetry Prize. She bends time and space to binge-watch Netflix. Gesila Nneka Uzukwu (PhD) is a lecturer in New Testament Studies in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, under the Faculty of Arts in Nasarawa State University, Nasarawa State. She also teaches biblical courses at the Missionary Seminary of St Paul Gwagwalada, Abuja. She obtained her Master’s degree in Religious Studies and a PhD in Biblical Exegesis from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. With her Doctoral Dissertation in 2011 she was acknowledged as the first African Woman to have obtained a Doctorate with a major in Biblical Exegesis in Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. Jones Otisi Kalu is an ordained minister with the Presbyterian Church of Nigeria. Currently lecturing in New Testament, Pauline Studies, NT Greek, and Hermeneutics/Exegesis at Hugh Goldie Theological Institution, he is also the Registrar of the college. He holds a Bachelor of Divinity and Master of Arts (New Testament), and is now at the writing-up stage of his PhD research (University of Nigeria). His PhD thesis on Paul’s concept of generosity in 2 Corinthians 8 is part of his overarching research interest: Paul’s theology of generosity and its implications for the church today, particularly in Africa László Sándor Egeresi (PhD) is an Assistant Professor and Chair of Old Testament Studies at Károli Gáspár Reformed University.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Transit Corridors and Assyrian Strategy: Case Studies from the 8th-7th Century BCE Southern Levant Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5r33f664 Author Fessler, Heidi Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Transit Corridors and Assyrian Strategy: Case Studies from the 8th-7th Century BCE Southern Levant A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philisophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures by Heidi Michelle Fessler 2016 © Copyright by Heidi Michelle Fessler 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Transit Corridors and Assyrian Strategy: Case Studies from the 8th-7th Century BCE Southern Levant by Heidi Michelle Fessler Doctor of Philisophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Aaron Alexander Burke, Chair Several modern studies and the Assyrians themselves have claimed not only the extreme military measures but also substantial geo-political impact of Assyrian conquest in the southern Levant; however, examples of Assyrian violence and control are actually underrepresented in the archaeological record. The few scholars that have pointed out this dearth of corroborative data have attributed it to an apathetic attitude adopted by Assyria toward the region during both conquest and political control. I argue in this dissertation that the archaeological record reflects Assyrian military strategy rather than indifference. Data from three case studies, Megiddo, Ashdod, and the Western Negev, suggest that the small number of sites with evidence of destruction and even fewer sites with evidence of Assyrian imperial control are a product of a strategy that allowed Assyria to annex the region with less investment than their annals claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Abstracts
    PAPER ABSTRACTS Plenary Address Eric H. Cline (The George Washington University), “Dirt, Digging, Dreams, and Drama: Why Presenting Proper Archaeology to the Public is Crucial for the Future of Our Field” We seem to have forgotten that previous generations of Near Eastern archaeologists knew full well the need to bring their work before the eyes of the general public; think especially of V. Gordon Childe, Sir Leonard Woolley, Gertrude Bell, James Henry Breasted, Yigael Yadin, Dame Kathleen Kenyon, and a whole host of others who lectured widely and wrote prolifically. Breasted even created a movie on the exploits of the Oriental Institute, which debuted at Carnegie Hall and then played around the country in the 1930s. The public was hungry for accurate information back then and is still hungry for it today. And yet, with a few exceptions, we have lost sight of this, sacrificed to the goal of achieving tenure and other perceived institutional norms, and have left it to others to tell our stories for us, not always to our satisfaction. I believe that it is time for us all— not just a few, but as many as possible—to once again begin telling our own stories about our findings and presenting our archaeological work in ways that make it relevant, interesting, and engaging to a broader audience. We need to deliver our findings and our thoughts about the ancient world in a way that will not only attract but excite our audiences. Our livelihoods, and the future of the field, depend upon it, for this is true not only for our lectures and writings for the general public but also in our classrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Revelations from Megiddo 2. Nov. 1997
    REVELATIONS F1 ROM ME6IDDO The Newsletter of The Megiddo Expedition tery from sites in southern Canaan, such as Tel Erani, En Besor and Arad, Egyptians at were made during the 1980s by Naomi Porat, then with the Geology Depart­ Early Bronze ment of Hebrew University. These investigations revealed that some of the more common Egyptian pottery Age Megiddo shapes were produced in southern to this period, especially in the south­ Canaan using techniques that imitated ern part of the country (the northern those employed in Egypt. As a result Anatylical Study of 11:arly Bronie Negev and the Shephela). of her conclusions, Porat coined the !1:gy pli an Pollcry Assemblage The nature and motives for the term 'Egyptianizing pottery' for those [rom Lhe Temple Compou nd interaction between Egypt and Canaan vessels which apparently had been are the subjects of a long-lasting de­ made by Egyptian potters who had n intriguing assemblage of bate. There are basically two interpre- settled in southern Canaan, together Early Bronze Age pottery from Megiddo, discovered during the 1996 excavation season, has been subjected to an analytical petrographic study in order to ascer­ tain its provenance. Petrographic analysis aims to identify the geo­ graphic region from which a given object comes by identifying its min­ eral content, then matching the results to the known geological composition of likely regions of origin. The assemblage represents some type of squatter activity within the abandoned monumental EBI (fourth millennium B.C.E.) temple com­ pound. The approximately 20 vessels were found bunched together in an area of about one square metre, indi­ cating that they were deliberately placed there, likely as offerings.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing the Source of the Elephant and Hippopotamus Ivory from the 14Th Century B.C
    Tracing the Source of the Elephant and Hippopotamus Ivory from the 14th Century B.C. Uluburun Shipwreck: The Archaeological, Historical, and Isotopic Evidence by Kathryn A. Lafrenz A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Robert H. Tykot, Ph.D. Brent R. Weisman, Ph.D. Nancy Marie White, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 6, 2004 Keywords: strontium, late bronze age, isotopes, trade, provenance © Copyright 2004 , Kathryn A. Lafrenz Acknowledgements I would like to thank, first and foremost, Robert Tykot for all his help and guidance during the process of researching and writing this thesis. I could not have asked for a better advisor. Also, much thanks is due to Nancy Marie White and Brent Weisman for agreeing to be on my thesis committee and for their comments and suggestions. The research for this thesis, moreover, would not have been possible without the generosity of Cemal Pulak, all those at the Institute of Nautical Archaeology, and the excavators of the Uluburun shipwreck, for providing the Uluburun ivory samples and the Maraş Fili faunal samples. Ivory, and especially ivory from archaeological contexts, is such a precious material, and to offer even small amounts of it to a pilot study is quite forward-thinking. Also, funding was provided in part by Sigma Xi Grants-in-Aid of Research and the Interdisciplinary Center for Hellenic Studies at the University of South Florida. Finally I wish to express my overwhelming gratitude to those who supported me and encouraged me, and without whom I would not have been able to complete this thesis: my father, Kelly Hockersmith, Stephanie Roberts, and Joshua Samuels.
    [Show full text]
  • ISBA9 9Th International Symposium on Biomolecular Archaeology June1st – 4Th 2021 (Toulouse, FRANCE)
    ISBA9 9th International Symposium on Biomolecular Archaeology June1st – 4th 2021 (Toulouse, FRANCE) 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TALKS Plant evolution and domestication Cheryl Makarewicz et al. Biomolecular identification of the Bronze Age p12 spread of millet into the Altai Philipp W. Stockhammer et al. Proteins and combustion markers in p12 human dental calculus from the 2nd millennium BCE Eastern Mediterranean Mélanie Roffet-Salque et al. Dairying, diseases and the evolution of p13 lactase persistence in Europe Oscar Estrada et al. VINICULTURE: grapes and wines in France from the p14 origins of viticulture to the Middle Ages Jazmin Ramos Madrigal et al. The journey of maize into Eastern North p14 America Isabelle Gaffney et al. Investigating drought stress markers in p15 archaeological maize using a novel paleometabolomics approach. Contributions about ancient diet and cuisine Christina Cheung et al. Fish for the babies - a reappraisal of the role of p17 protein-based weaning food in human prehistory Jasmin Lundy et al. Cuisine in Medieval Sicily: insights from organic p17 residue analysis of ceramics containers and other archaeological evidence Sylvia Soncin et al. Diet at 79AD Herculaneum: a compound specific p18 stable isotope approach Vika Efrossini et al. Autarchy on an island? A multi-method reconstruction p19 of diets in Late Bronze Age Kefalonia, Greece. Pierre-Jean Dodat et al. Isotopic calcium biogeochemistry: dietary p19 reconstruction of two Neandertals from Regourdou site (Dordogne, France) and comparison with one Neandertal from La Grotte du Bison (Yonne, France). Florinda Notarstefano et al. Feasts and drinks in Iron Age communities of p20 southern Apulia: residue analyses in indigenous decorated pottery Innovative methods developed to optimize the recovery and analysis of ancient biomolecules Alexandra Morton-Hayward et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religion of Idumea and Its Relationship to Early Judaism
    religions Article The Religion of IdumeaArticle and Its Relationship to Early The Religion of Idumea and Its Relationship to Judaism Early Judaism Yigal Levin The Israel and Golda Koschitzky DepartmentYigal Levin of Jewish History and Contemporary Jewry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel;The [email protected] Israel and GoldaKoschitzky Department of Jewish History and Contemporary Jewry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel; [email protected] Received: 1 September 2020; Accepted: 21 September 2020; Published: 24 September 2020 Received: 1 September 2020; Accepted: 21 September 2020; Published: 24 September 2020 Abstract: For several hundred years, from the late Iron Age to the end of the 2nd century BCE, the southern neighbor of Judea was “Idumea”, populated by descendants of Edomites, together with Abstract: For several hundred years, from the late Iron Age to the end of the 2nd century BCE, Qedarite and other Arabs and a mix of additional ethnicities. This paper examines the known data the southern neighbor of Judea was “Idumea”, populated by descendants of Edomites, together with on the identity, especially religious identity, of these Idumeans, using a wide range of written Qedarite and other Arabs and a mix of additional ethnicities. This paper examines the known data sources and archaeological data. Within the Bible, “Edom” is presented as Israel’s twin and its on the identity, especially religious identity, of these Idumeans, using a wide range of written sources harshest enemy, but there are hints that the Edomites worshipped the God of Israel. While the and archaeological data. Within the Bible, “Edom” is presented as Israel’s twin and its harshest origins of the “Edomite deity” Qaus remain obscure, as does the process of their migration into enemy, but there are hints that the Edomites worshipped the God of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Ca. 3150 BCE – Ca. 2950 BCE
    The Nile Delta as a centre of cultural interactions between Upper Egypt and the Southern Levant in the 4th millennium BC Studies in African Archaeology 13 REFLECTIONS ON THE COntEXT OF A LATE DYNASTY 0 EGYPTIAN COLONY IN THE SOUTHERN LEVAnt: IntERPRETING SOME EVIDENCE OF NILOTIC MATERIAL CULTURE AT SELECT SITES IN THE SOUTHERN LEVAnt (cA. 3150 BCE – cA. 2950 BCE) eliOT brAuN Israel THE BACKGROUND Since the discovery of the first Egyptian serekh of Narmer at Tel Erani (yeiviN 1960), scholars have become aware of a significant degree of Nilotic imports and Egyptian- influenced objects, particularly pottery in the Early Bronze Age, primarily in the region of the Gaza Strip and south-central Israel (Fig. 1). While early works were somewhat less than specific as to the time span when the mass of Egyptian-related material appeared in the archaeological record, more recent research (yekuTieli 1991; 2001; brAuN & vAN DeN briNk 1998) has shown the phenomenon to be associated with late phases of Early Bronze Age I (regev et al. 2012: 526), but mainly at select sites within a limited geographical region. The appearance and quantification of Egyptian-related artifacts in the Early Bronze Age, as presently understood from the archaeological record, has suggested a four-tiered hierarchy (brAuN 2004: 512-514) of Egyptian associations. Tier 1 sites are defined as those likely to have primarily been peopled by Egyptians1, while sites defined as Tiers 2-4, have yielded, respectively and in descending order, significantly less, very little, or no evidence of Egyptian material culture. All this intensified activity appears, on the basis of a number of serekhs found at sites in the southern Levant, to date to the reigns of Ka and Narmer (van DeN briNk & brAuN 2002), sometime at the end of the fourth millennium (brAuN & van DeN briNk 1998; Dee et al.
    [Show full text]