Great Famine in Ukraine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Famine in Ukraine GREAT FAMINE IN UKRAINE I ST. VOLOOYMYR BRUTHERHO00 TORONTO 1988 THE GREAT FAMINE IN UKRAINE 1932-33 A Collection of Memoirs, Speeches and Essays Prepared in 1983 in Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the Famine in Ukraine During 1932-33 The Ukrainian Orthodox Brotherhood of St. Volodymyr diasporiana.org.ua Toronto 1988 All rights reserved by the Ukrainian Orthodox Brotherhood of St. Volodymyr, Toronto Publication Committee Members: V. Rudenko - Committee Head T. Khokhitva - Editor-Administrator P. Makohon F. Podopryhoda The Ukrainian Orthodox Brotherhood of St. Volodymyr in Toronto dedicates this volume to our descendents, in eternal memory of those who were killed by the man-made famine in Ukraine, perpetrated by Russian Communist rule against the Ukrainian nation. We also commemorate this publication to the Millenium of Christianity in Ukraine. Preface We, the Ukrainian Orthodox Brotherhood of St. blodymyr in Toronto, are the publisher of this volume, entitled "The Great Famine in Ukraine of 1932-33." In publishing it, we did not expect to uncover some novel secret, nor did we expect to add anything new or unknown to the chronicles of that terrible event in Ukraine. We did not wish to discuss with the world whether this famine was an elemental, natural misfortune, or whether it was consciously created by men, who had unlimited power in a huge country they came to call the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and which includes Ukraine as a sovereign Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. All of this is now evident to the world. We are certain that the time will come when the world will awake from its psychosis; when it will come out from under the spell of Marxist Communism; and will bring down the rightful condemnation of the criminals who engineered this famine, exactly as it justly condemned the more recent criminals - the Nazi Hitlerites. 1983 marked the passing of fifty years since the great famine in Ukraine, and the Ukrainian emigre community commemorated the anniversary of this tragic event. During that year, a number of lectures were delivered, and a number of articles were published on the subject, not only in the Ukrainian press, but also in the media of the countries where Ukrainians have settled, countries of which they have become citizens. These addresses and articles are the testimonies of the people who survived the famine. These are the words of the people who lost their sisters, brothers,fathers, mothers, relatives, neighbours, and CO-villagers. However, all of these articles and addresses are ephemeral. They were heard or read and then passed into oblivion. Nevertheless, we must not forget everything. Sometimes we can and must forget injuries or insults of a personal nature, committed perhaps unconsciously or inadvertently, but a conscious and deliberate crime committed against a whole people, such as that famine, should not only not be forgotten, but should be rememberedfrom genemtion to generation, in order that anything similar does not occur in their future. Therefore, the Ukrainian Orthodox Brotherhood of St. blodymyr in Toronto decided to bring these materials together and publish them as a collection, and thus preserve them. None of the authors are masters of the literary word. They are simple people who speak as they write. They set out their memories of events in simple narrative, just as they had seen and experienced them. Do some of the authors express their opinions about the reasons for the famine? To a simple question, there must be a simple answer: the famine was caused by the communist Muscovite rulers who inhumanely stole absolutely all grain from Ukrainianfarmers, and left them nothing for either food or seed. This occurred because the government demanded more grain from these farmers than they could produce. This was an incomprehensible and barbaric act that cannot be mitigated by any explanation. The communist press (there was no other) released reports abroad, and for self-gratijcation, at home, to the effect that the productivity of agriculture increased dramatically with the introduction of collectivization. However, this was a bluff and a boast that the communists mislead even themselves with. How could agricultural production increase if the transfer from individual control to collective was experimental? Aside from this, the "dekulakization" campaign eliminated more than two hundred thousand of the most prosperous and most productive farms. Over one million, two hundred thousand of the ablest farmers were tomfrom their jobs figures given in ksyl' Hryshko's '%tempt on the Life of a Nation"). Those given control of the collective farms were incompetent and inexperienced in administering large agricultural operations, but they were members of the Communist Party. They directed the work exclusively according to the dictates of the Party, sent "ji-om above." Some of the authors attempt to examine the "reason" for the famine. They try tojnd out what motives led the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) to decide to commit this crime, and then carry it out in Ukraine. One of these motives was the Party's constant fear of a renaissance of the Ukrainian nation, a nation that had shown its heroism and character during the years of the revolution and rebirth of 1917-20. It was then that a Ukrainian Sovereign State had been established. This crime was also a punishment for the armed resistance of the Ukrainian people against Russian communist colonialism during these years, and for the unwillingness of the Ukrainian people to accept the communist ideology. The Soviet rulers called this unwillingness "Ukminian bourgeois nationalism" - the ostensible "antithesis" of communist "internationalism," that was simply Russian chauvinism in disguise. The efforts to combat not only nationalism, but even patriotism in Ukraine has continued to be part of the daily agenda of the CPSU throughout the years that Ukraine has been part of the USSR. This is an obvious, and even unconcealed policy of the Central Committee. However, there are conspiratorial policies about which we can only speculate. It is obvious that almost 75% of the Central Committee of the CPSU was of Jewish descent, and with their majority in this body, they could, from a concealed vantage point, exuct revenge on the Ukrainian people for the pogroms carried out by roving bands of undetermined nationality on the territory of Ukraine. This theory is grounded on the actions of Jewish extremists, who shot the President of the Ukrainian People's Republic, Symon Petliura, in the streets of Paris in 1926, and who continue to take hostile actions against the Ukrainian people. Another factor that could have prompted the communist clique to commit the crime of murder by famine, was international trade. As everyone must know, in those days, the main exports of the USSR were timber, various other raw materials and grain. This was written about by Bernard E Lancaster of the New York Herald Tribune. In his article he wrote thar the Soviet Union sold its commodities on the international market at grossly deJated prices in order to dump them, and thereby deepen the economic crisis in the world at the time, and particularly in America. Lancaster claimed that the Soviets also wanted to demonstrate to the world that their communistfatherland had become wealthy simply because they had taken power. Lancaster also explained that they also sought foreign currency for the purchase of machines and weapons for its communist empire. Stalin himself discussed the famine with Churchill when the latter raised the matter of the incredible losses of human life during the years of collectivization and famine. He said: "But of course. Truly, it was horrijic... But it had been absolutely necessary in order that new machines be produced in our factories, and that new tractors appear in ourfields." (Winston Churchill, The Second World War vol. 4, chap. 25.) Stalin S words sufice to give an adequate understanding of communist estimation of the worth of the individual. Stalin slightly raised the curtain behind which the great secret lay hidden. Obviously, the Central Committee of the CPSUplanned the industrialization and militarization of its communist empire, but in so doing it assumed responsibilities upon which its further existence depended. Thus, in order to save itself, they despoiled the Ukrainian poor and middle peasantry, left them without a crust of bread to starve to death, and deported the wealthier, so-called "kulaks" into the northern taiga to fell timber for export. Without a doubt, bringing the famine in Ukraine of 1932-33 to light is dangerous to the communists now in power. Regardless of the passage of fi& years, and the fact that almost none of those (except Lazar Kaganovich) who carried it out are alive, the leaders of the Soviet Union have never been able to publicly admit the guilt of their predecessors, and that of Stalin in particular. Despite the fact that the Party itself has condemned him for his barbarities, they are still afraid to mention that famine and try to act as if it never happened. Some of the authors express bitterness about the Western world S indifference to the tragedy of the Ukrainian people. This indifference truly was and is very strange, although at the time, there were reasons for it. As everyone must know, it was strictly forbidden to write about the famine, or even to mention it in conversation. The leaders of the Soviet Union made every effort to conceal the famine in Ukminefrom the outside world. The Soviet Union also invited only those journalists who were communist sympathizers. These journalists wrote misleading reports in the Westernpress based on data they receivedfrom the Soviet rulers. For this they might have even received compensation from the government of the USSR. This was definitely the case with Walter Duranty.
Recommended publications
  • Building an Unwanted Nation: the Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository BUILDING AN UNWANTED NATION: THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP AND AUSTRIAN PROPONENTS OF A SEPARATE NATIONHOOD, 1918-1934 Kevin Mason A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by: Advisor: Dr. Christopher Browning Reader: Dr. Konrad Jarausch Reader: Dr. Lloyd Kramer Reader: Dr. Michael Hunt Reader: Dr. Terence McIntosh ©2007 Kevin Mason ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Kevin Mason: Building an Unwanted Nation: The Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934 (Under the direction of Dr. Christopher Browning) This project focuses on American and British economic, diplomatic, and cultural ties with Austria, and particularly with internal proponents of Austrian independence. Primarily through loans to build up the economy and diplomatic pressure, the United States and Great Britain helped to maintain an independent Austrian state and prevent an Anschluss or union with Germany from 1918 to 1934. In addition, this study examines the minority of Austrians who opposed an Anschluss . The three main groups of Austrians that supported independence were the Christian Social Party, monarchists, and some industries and industrialists. These Austrian nationalists cooperated with the Americans and British in sustaining an unwilling Austrian nation. Ultimately, the global depression weakened American and British capacity to practice dollar and pound diplomacy, and the popular appeal of Hitler combined with Nazi Germany’s aggression led to the realization of the Anschluss .
    [Show full text]
  • Josef Bick. Versuch Einer Monographie
    DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit Josef Bick. Versuch einer Monographie. Verfasserin Beate Fechter, Bakk. angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag.phil.) Wien, 2013 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 332 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Diplomstudium Deutsche Philologie Betreuer: a.o. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Murray G. Hall „DANKE“ für … mein Studium, die Unterstützung und dass Ihr an mich denkt – meine Familie. …die Überlassung des Themas, die Geduld, die Betreuung und die Jours fixes – Herr Prof. Hall. …die Bereitschaft, mir Einblick in den privaten Teilnachlass Ihres Großvaters zu gewähren, Ihr stets freundliches Entgegenkommen und die Unterstützung – Herr Hofrat Dr. Krause. …die Vermittlung zu Herrn Hofrat Dr. Krause – Herr Hofrat Dr. König. …die offene und freundliche Teilhabe an Ihrem Wissen – Herr Offermann. …das Gespräch, das Interesse und die Begeisterung – Herr Mag. Bauer. …die ständige Bereitschaft Dich durch ein Gespräch unterbrechen zu lassen – Stefan. …den stets unkomplizierten Zugang zu den Archivalien und die Zeit für ein ermutigendes Gespräch – Herr Prof. Mikoletzky und das Team des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs. …die immer freundliche und rasche Beantwortung meiner Anfragen – Herr Rataj vom Universitätsarchiv Prag. …den Zuspruch, die Ermutigung und die Kritik – Natalie und Romy. …die Anteilnahme und Unterstützung, und ENTSCHULDIGUNG – diejenigen, die ich in der Aufzählung hier leider übersehen habe und denen ich dennoch zu Dank verpflichtet bin! INHALTSVERZEICHNIS 1. Einleitung ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Pius XII Never Spoke out Publicly Against the Persecution of the Jews Is a Matter of Great Debate
    Pius XII (Eugenio Pacelli; 1876-1958), Pope from 1939-1958. As Pope throughout World War II, Pius XII was controversial for his failure to publicly condemn the extermination of Europe's Jews. During the 1920s, Pacelli was the papal ambassador to Germany. In 1933, while serving as the Vatican's secretary of state, he signed a pact with Nazi Germany. This was considered a diplomatic triumph for Hitler. Cardinal Pacelli was elected Pope on March 2, 1939, and took the name Pius XII. Under his leadership, the Vatican was mixed about its attitude towards helping Jews. Right after his election, Pius XII stepped in to obtain 3,000 visas to Brazil (a Catholic country) for Jews who had been baptized. However, just a year later, the Pope ignored requests made by the Chief Rabbi of Palestine, Isaac Herzog, to intercede on behalf of Jews in Spain so that they not be sent back to Germany. A similar request was made concerning Jews in Lithuania; this was also neglected by the Pope. The Vatican's Secretariat of State was one of the first groups in the world to receive reports about the extermination of the Jews. In early 1941 Cardinal Theodor Innitzer of Vienna told Pius XII about the deportation of Jews. A representative of the Vatican in Slovakia, Giuseppe Burzio, informed the Vatican about the systematic murder of Jews in his area. On October 7, 1942 the chaplain of a hospital train in Poland told the Vatican about "mass assassination," and mentioned the number two million as the count of those already killed.
    [Show full text]
  • N in Ukraine 27 Hennadii Yefimenko
    VOL 1 • ISSUE 1 • 2009 n i n o m In Memoriam: Raphael Lemkln [1900-1959] Raphael Lemkin on the Ukrainian genocide Memories of Communist and Nazi Crimes Polish Diplomats on the Holodomor Red Cross Documents on the Great Famine HOLODOMOR STUDIES EDITOR Roman Serbyn Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Canada Email: Serbvn.Roman@Videotron. ca HOLODOMOR STUDIES is published semi­ annually. Subscription rates are: Institutions - $40.00; Individuals - $20.00. USA postage is $6.00; Canadian postage is $12.00; foreign postage is $20.00. Send payment to: Charles Schlacks, Publisher, P.O. Box 1256, Idyllwild, CA 92549-1256, USA. Email: [email protected] Cover Design: Olena Sullivan, Toronto, Can­ ada. www.olena.ca Manuscripts submitted for possible publication should be sent to the editor. Manuscripts ac­ cepted for publication should be sent to the pub­ lisher as email attachments or on CDs suitable for Windows XP and Word 2003. Copyright © 2009 by Charles Schlacks, Pub­ lisher All rights reserved Printed in the USA Vol. 1, No. 1 Winter-Spring 2009 HOLODOMOR STUDIES TABLE OF CONTENTS PUBLISHER’S PREFACE v Charles Schlacks EDITOR’S FOREWORD vii Roman Serbyn IN MEMORIAN: RAPHAEL LEMKIN [1900-1959] Lemkin on the Ukrainian Genocide 1 Roman Serbyn Soviet Genocide in Ukraine 3 Raphael Lemkin ARTICLES Competing Memories o f Communist and Nazis Crimes in Ukraine 9 Roman Serbyn The Soviet Nationalities Policy Change of 1933, or Why “Ukrainian Nationalism ” Became the Main Threat to Stalin in Ukraine 27 Hennadii Yefimenko Foreign Diplomats on the
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation
    Dissertation Titel der Dissertation „Vom Untergang der Demokratie bis zum Beginn der 2. Republik – Die Christliche Arbeiterbewegung in den Jahren 1933 – 1946“ Verfasser Mag.phil. Georg-Hans Schmit angestrebter akademischer Grad Doktor der Philosophie (Dr.phil.) Wien, 31.7.2012 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 092 300 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Politikwissenschaft Betreuer: Univ. Doz. Dr. Johann Dvo řák 1 Inhaltsverzeichnis EINLEITUNG ........................................................................................................................................4 VORGESCHICHTE ............................................................................................................................20 CHRISTLICHSOZIALE PARTEI UND CHRISTLICHE ARBEITERBEWEGUNG ..............................................20 SOZIALISIERUNG UND PERSÖNLICHES UMFELD BEDEUTENDER VERTRETER DER CHRISTLICHEN ARBEITERBEWEGUNG .........................................................................................................................32 DIE CHRISTLICHE ARBEITERBEWEGUNG IN DEN JAHREN 1933 BIS 1938.....................51 PROGRAMMATIK UND IDEOLOGISCHE GRUNDHALTUNG .....................................................................51 Ständische Verfassung und die Grundlagen der Christlichen Arbeiterbewegung – Vergleich und Widersprüche................................................................................................................................63 DIE „E INHEITSGEWERKSCHAFT “ ........................................................................................................84
    [Show full text]
  • Kirche Und NS in Vorarlberg
    1 Kirche und Nationalsozialismus in Vorarlberg Folgende Auszüge aus ihrer Diplomarbeit hat uns Frau Mag. Susanne Emerich dankenswerterweise zur Verfügung gestellt. _ Emerich, Susanne, Katholische Kirche in Vorarlberg. Aspekte ihrer Geschichte 1934 – 1950, Dipl. Arb., Innsbruck 2001. Übersicht 1. Die Kirche in Österreich ............................................................................................... 2 1.1. Der Klerus............................................................................................................ 2 1.2. Die Bischöfe......................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Bischof Alois Hudal ............................................................................................... 5 2. Erfolglose Verhandlungen zwischen Kirche und neuen Machthabern ................................... 7 2.1 Die "Feierliche Erklärung"........................................................................................ 8 2.2 Reaktionen auf die "Feierliche Erklärung" in Vorarlberg ...............................................11 3. Das Konkordat von 1933/34 .......................................................................................13 4. Katholische Organisationen .........................................................................................14 4. 1."Katholische Aktion" und "Volksbund der Katholiken Österreichs" ..............................14 4. 2 "Katholische Reichsfrauenorganisation"...................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Cómo Escaparon De Europa Los Criminales De Guerra Nazis
    LOMO: 20 mm PRUEBA dIGITAL VALIdA COMO PRUEBA dE COLOR EXCEPTO TINTAS dIRECTAS, STAMPINGS, ETC. dISEÑO 00/00/0000 diseñador Alemania es ahora mismo una tabula Cuando vieron que la guerra estaba perdida, importantes rasa. Podemos y debemos construir criminales de guerra nazis se escondieron o huyeron EdICIÓN - una Alemania mejor desde sus mismos de Europa, ayudados en muchos casos por el Vaticano, cimientos. Reconocemos la obligación de Alemania de pagar por los crímenes el Gobierno de Franco, el de Perón o el estadounidense. SELLO TEMAS dE hOy de guerra cometidos en su nombre. Eric Frattini sigue la pista a una docena de ellos paso Eric Frattini es autor de veintisiete ensayos, COLECCIÓN Los incontables criminales de guerra traducidos a quince idiomas y publicados en FORMATO 15 X 23mm a paso, por las rutas que siguieron, dejando tras de sí RUSTICA SOLAPAS que llevaron el nazismo al poder y cuarenta y dos países, entre los que destacan Osama bin Laden, la espada de Alá (2001); Mafia una terrible huella de sangre y horror. SERVICIO empezaron la guerra, los criminales S. A. 100 años de Cosa Nostra (2002); Secretos de Buchenwald, Belsen y Majdanek, vaticanos (2003); La Santa Alianza, cinco siglos de espionaje vaticano (2004); ONU, historia de deberían ser castigados con toda CARACTERÍSTICAS severidad. Ninguno de nosotros pide la corrupción (2005); CIA, joyas de familia (2008); Mossad, los verdugos del Kidon (2009), Los cuervos compasión para con el pueblo alemán. IMPRESIÓN CMyK del Vaticano (2012), ¿Murió Hitler en el búnker? 5/0 CMyK + pantONE 1795 C - Sabemos que los alemanes tendremos (2015), El libro negro del Vaticano (2016) o que trabajar para ganarnos Desde Eichmann y Stangl hacia abajo, el noventa por ciento de Manipulando la historia (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine – Freedom Frontier
    UKRAINE – FREEDOM FRONTIER Almost a century ago, the Bolsheviks could not secure their victory and retain power over the vast Russian Empire without controlling Ukraine, which used to be the resource base of the entire region. The Communists consolidated overwhelming forces to destroy the newly independent Ukrainian Peo- ple’s Republic that emerged in 1918. Ukraine lost this battle, yet the fight for freedom continued. The sole fact that Ukrainian territories were not annexed and incorporated into Russia, but assembled as a Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic demonstrated that the war exhausted both sides. However, this status quo was short-lived. In late 1920s, Joseph Stalin became the supreme authority in the Kremlin and embarked on an ambitious program to build up a totalitarian state. The people across the Soviet Union were outraged, protesting and rioting against Stalin’s new policies. The revolutionary promise “Land to the farmers and factories to the workers” became a farce as the state prohibited even small private enterprises. Slavery was returned to the lands, revealing itself through the confiscation of property, inventory and restric- tions on the freedom of movement. On the other hand, rural uprisings threatened Stalin’s plans. Over half of these protests took place in Ukraine. The Communist dictator designed a ruthless response, creating a man-made famine. In 1922-1933, several million Ukrainians perished after being besieged by Soviet troops who confis- cated not only bread, but anything edible from the Ukrainian households. In June of 1933 about 24 Ukrainians were dying every minute. Stalin’s design went much farther than simply sup- pressing protest movements.
    [Show full text]
  • 3) EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS and MEMOIRS Introduction This Section
    3) EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS AND MEMOIRS Introduction This section contains descriptions, reports, and memoirs of the famine by eyewitnesses and contemporaries. In Kapoot, Carveth Wells, a world traveler and writer, notes that “the farther we penetrated into the Ukraine” in July 1932, “the less food there was and the more starvation to be seen on every side.” This is followed by one of the first reports of 1933 about the famine, filed by Gareth Jones: it was immediately disputed by the New York Times reporter Walter Duranty. Two other journalists, Malcolm Muggeridge and William Chamberlin, both saw the famine as a struggle between the Soviet state and the peasantry and blamed the authorities for it. The French journalist Suzanne Bertillon interviewed Martha Stebalo, an American citizen of Ukrainian origin who had visited famine-stricken Ukraine in July–August 1933. She concludes that the Kremlin organized the famine to destroy Ukrainian hopes of self-rule. Harry Lang, a journalist with the Yiddish-language Jewish Daily Forward (New York), provides horrific details of the famine, notes the resistance of Ukraine’s peasants to collective farming, likens a village to “cemeteries of houses,” and recognizes that the famine was man- made. He visits a model Jewish collective farm, noting that aid from Jews living abroad helped save its members from starvation. Whiting Williams, who traveled in Ukraine in 1933, describes how peasants hoped to save their children by abandoning them in Kharkiv. He was told that these “wild children” would be “unloaded out in the open country—too far out for it to be possible to walk back to town.” Eugene Lyons describes how Western journalists downplayed or failed to report on the famine.
    [Show full text]
  • Badge, Jewish
    Badge, Jewish, Distinguishing sign that Jews in Nazi Germany and in Nazi-occupied countries were compelled to wear to facilitate their identification as Jews. Such a distinctive sign had been imposed on Jews in ancient times, in the form of the color or shape of the clothes, shoes, hats, or scarves they were obliged to wear in order to differentiate between them and the rest of the population and humiliate them in other people's eyes. The first to introduce such a sign were the Muslims, who in the eighth century decreed that all the dhimmi (protected people) - Christians, Jews, and Samaritans - must wear clothes that set them apart from the Muslims. In Yemen such clothes were obligatory for Jews until the twentieth century. In Christian countries, distinctive signs for Jews were introduced on the basis of a canon issued by the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215, under Pope Innocent III (1198-1216), which laid down that Jews "of both sexes, in all Christian lands, shall be differentiated from the rest of the population by the quality of their garment." The form of this differentiation was not specified, but the decision makes it clear that its purpose was to prevent sexual intercourse between Jews and Christians. The Lateran Council decision was not applied in all Christian countries at all times, or in a uniform manner, but the introduction of a "Jewish badge" did spread, and it became a means of shaming and humiliating Jews. The pointed hat, as a distinctive sign for Jews, is known to have been in use from the thirteenth century in various Germanic countries.
    [Show full text]
  • German Attitude Toward the Vatican 1933-1945
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1967 German attitude toward the Vatican 1933-1945 Barry Eugene Gilbert The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Gilbert, Barry Eugene, "German attitude toward the Vatican 1933-1945" (1967). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5573. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5573 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GERMAN ATTITUDE TOWARD TRE VATICAN 1933 - 1 9 ^ By Barry Eugene Gilbert B. A„ University of Montana, 1966 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of -• Master of Arts UNIVERSITY- ©F MONTANA 1967 Approved by Chairman/ Board of Examiners Graduate School ■ M i l - 8 1867: UMI Number: EP41037 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP41037 Published by ProQuest LLC (2014). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Academy of Sciences in Vienna 1938 to 1945 Austrian Academy of Sciences Johannes Feichtinger, Herbert Matis, Stefan Sienell, Heidemarie Uhl (Eds.)
    JOHANNES FEICHTINGER, HERBERT MATIS, STEFAN SIENELL, HEIDEMARIE UHL (EDS.) THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES IN VIENNA 1938 TO 1945 AUSTRIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JOHANNES FEICHTINGER, HERBERT MATIS, STEFAN SIENELL, HEIDEMARIE UHL (EDS.) The Academy of Sciences in Vienna 1938 to 1945 together with Silke Fengler Translation from German: Nick Somers, Cynthia Peck-Kubaczek Translation of the exhibition catalog Johannes Feichtinger, Herbert Matis, Stefan Sienell, Heidemarie Uhl (eds.) Die Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 1938 bis 1945. Katalog zur Ausstellung (Vienna 2013). ISBN 978-3-7001-7367-0 Illustrations on the cover: Background: ÖNB, Bildarchiv, Sign. L32608C Seal: AÖAW, Siegelsammlung British Library Cataloguing in Publication data A Catalogue record of this book is available from the British Library Printed on chlorine-free bleached cellulose, acid free, non-ageing paper Alle Rechte vorbehalten / All rights reserved ISBN 978-3-7001-7537-7 Copyright © 2014 by Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften / Austrian Academy of Sciences Wien / Vienna Gesamtherstellung / produced by: Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.m.b.H., A-3580 Horn http://hw.oeaw.ac.at/7537-7 http://verlag.oeaw.ac.at Printed and bound in the EU Table of Contents Table of Contents Preface to the English edition (The Editors).................................................... 7 Preface (Helmut Denk) .................................................................................. 9 I. THE “ANSCHLUSS” AND NAZI RULE .............................................. 11 The “Anschluss”
    [Show full text]