A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of at the University of Otago, Dunedin
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Thucydides' Corinthians: an examination of Corinth in Thucydides' account of the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War Nicholas McKenzie A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. 2010 ABSTRACT This thesis examines Thucydides‟ presentation of the Corinthians in his account of the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War. It discusses how and where Thucydides manipulates his description of events in order to stress the impression of Corinthian belligerence as a cause of the war, and highlights how this presentation allows Thucydides to present Athenian actions in a positive light, by making them appear as reactions to Corinthian intransigence. This thesis also examines the background to the conflict and discusses how the Athenians can be seen as largely responsible for creating the tension between Athens and Corinth because of their desire for the natural resources of the west, which resulted in a policy aimed at controlling strategic locations along the Corinthian Gulf. Finally, the Corinthian navy is examined from two perspectives: Thucydides‟ presentation of it in action; and what the reality of Corinthian naval strength was at the time of the war‟s outbreak. This section discusses how the less professional nature of the Corinthian navy allowed Thucydides to exaggerate certain weaknesses in order to make the Athenian navy appear even more superior than it already was. Ultimately, this thesis shows how a closer and more critical examination of Thucydides‟ presentation of Corinth helps us to understand better the complex background to the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Patricia Hannah. It was a great privilege to study under Dr Hannah, who, somehow, can make even the most difficult Thucydidean issue seem relatively straightforward. The friendly and relaxed manner she went about helping me in my work is very much appreciated and I have benefited greatly from her guidance. I would also like to thank the other members of the Classics department at Otago for their support. In particular, I would like to acknowledge Dr Andrew Collins, Dr John Walsh (now University of Guelph), and Thomas Köntges for their various pieces of help and advice. A special mention must also go to Dean Alexander who went through the journey with me and was a good friend throughout. To my flatmates over the past couple of years, Sam, Rob, James, Hamish, Sarah and Jess, thanks for reminding me that there is a world outside of Classics, and for always being prepared to “chew the cud.” Finally, a special thanks to my parents and sister. Although they neither know anything about, nor care about Classics, they were always prepared to listen, and I would not have been able to complete this thesis without their support. This thesis is dedicated to them. iii CONTENTS Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Abbreviations v Introduction 1 Chapter One: The Corinthians‟ Role in the Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War 6 Chapter Two: Corinth‟s Relations with Athens through the Fifth Century 57 Chapter Three: The Corinthian Navy 93 Conclusion 122 Maps: 128 1. Greece 129 2. The Isthmus Region 130 3. The Corinthian Gulf 131 4. Sicily and Italy 131 Bibliography 132 iv ABBREVIATIONS IG Inscriptiones Graecae OCD3 Simon Hornblower and A. Spawforth. eds. 2003. The Oxford Classical Dictionary. Revised Third Edition. Oxford. SEG Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum TLG Thesaurus Linguae Graecae v INTRODUCTION The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC) was fought between two alliances led by the “superpowers” of fifth century Greece: Athens and Sparta. According to the contemporary historian Thucydides, this war was the greatest disturbance in the history of the Hellenes, affecting more cities and more people than any previous conflict (1.1.1-2; 1.23.1-3). The cause of this great conflict is a complex question. Thucydides claims that the truest reason (a0lhqesta/thn pro/fasin) for the war was the Athenians becoming powerful and the fear this inspired in the Spartans (1.23.6). Yet, Thucydides also set out to give a detailed account of the complaints and disputes (ta_j ai0ti/aj ... kai_ ta_j diafora/j) which led to the Spartans declaring war on Athens (1.23.5). The most prominent polis in his record of these complaints and disputes is Corinth. The majority of scholars who discuss the causes of the Peloponnesian War tend to focus on whether Thucydides was right to attribute the Spartan fear of Athenian growth as the a0lhqesta/thn pro/fasin of the war.1 In doing so, many have questioned Thucydides‟ presentation of events and discussed at great length the complaints and disputes which he does not describe in any detail, especially those of the Megarians and Aeginetans, in an attempt to explain why Thucydides presented the outbreak of the war in the way he has. While the role of the Corinthians is rarely ignored, it is often not given the attention it deserves, and Thucydides‟ depiction of them as aggressive and warmongering is usually 1 Given the vast amount of literature on Thucydides and the causes of the Peloponnesian War I have decided not to include a literature review in this introduction. The views of the modern scholars will become apparent in the body of this thesis, especially in the footnotes. 1 followed by modern scholars.2 Few have paused to examine critically Thucydides‟ negative presentation of the Corinthians.3 The purpose of this thesis is to examine whether, and if so, how and where, Thucydides has deliberately manipulated his narrative in order to emphasise the negative impression of the Corinthians. By doing so, it is hoped that a more balanced interpretation of Corinthian actions in the events leading to the war can be reached. Chapter one will offer a detailed discussion of Corinthian actions in Thucydides‟ account of the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War. The first section of this chapter will discuss the Corinthian dispute with Corcyra, which Thucydides presents as the first ai0ti/a of the war. It will attempt to show that the Corinthians were not simply acting irrationally in their dispute with Corcyra over Epidamnus, but that they had legitimate reasons for becoming involved in the conflict. Moreover, it will point out that the Corcyraeans were not free from blame in the affair. The attempted mediation by the Corcyraeans at Corinth will be highlighted as an example of Thucydides attempting to portray the Corinthians as excessively belligerent and responsible for the eventual involvement of the Athenians. The debate between the Corinthians and Corcyraeans at Athens will also be discussed, in order to show how the Corinthians attempted to warn the Athenians that an alliance with Corcyra would be a breach of the “spirit” of the Thirty Years Peace, and could lead to war. This section will then move on to describe how Thucydides presents the Corinthians as responsible for the collision between the Peloponnesian and Athenian ships at the battle of 2 Even Badian (1993) 125-62, who advanced the thesis that Thucydides deliberately misrepresented the Spartans in his account of the war’s outbreak, did not seem to consider the possibility that the Corinthians may also have suffered similar misrepresentation. 3 Salmon (1984) 281-305 is one scholar who has examined the Corinthian actions in some detail. However, in a book devoted to looking at the history of Corinth, he takes a surprisingly Atheno-centric view of the causes of the war. 2 Sybota. Particular attention will be placed on Thucydides‟ description of the aftermath of the battle, and how he manages to deflect attention from Athenian aggressiveness by creating drama to his narrative and through focussing his account on the actions of the Corinthians. The second section of chapter one will discuss Thucydides‟ description of the Potidaean revolt. It will focus on how Thucydides cleverly turns Corinthian anger over the Athenian involvement at Sybota into a motivating factor for the Potidaeans to revolt. This section will also note that the Athenians were acting more aggressively in the north Aegean prior to the war than what Thucydides‟ narrative would imply. The final section of this chapter will discuss how Thucydides treats the Corinthians as the catalyst for the eventual involvement of the Spartans in the escalating conflict, thereby sealing the impression of Corinthian responsibility for the war. Chapter two will examine the relationship between the Corinthians and Athenians through the fifth century. This is essential to the discussion because it shows how the Athenians can be seen as largely responsible for creating the tension between Corinth and Athens prior to the war. In particular, this chapter will discuss whether the growing Athenian interest in the natural resources of Sicily and Italy played a significant role in bringing the two poleis into conflict. It will also examine the possibility that the Athenians were highly motivated in securing key strategic locations along the Corinthian Gulf during the fifth century, as a result of their interest in the resources of the west. This chapter will then discuss the Megarian decree in order to highlight how the Athenians used economic pressure on Megara in an attempt to force them to rejoin their empire, which would give the Athenians access to both sides of the Isthmus. Finally, this chapter will briefly examine the archaeological evidence from Corinth to see if the Athenians were placing economic pressure on the Corinthians like they were on the Megarians. 3 The third and final chapter will focus on the Corinthian navy, since Thucydides places great importance on naval matters in his narrative of the war‟s outbreak. Moreover, it seems to be another area where Thucydides shapes his narrative to misrepresent the Corinthians.