DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Block Pages.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

120 NEW VISION, Tuesday, January 26, 2016 NRM ANNIVERSARY ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE WATER AND ENVIRONRMENT SECTOR DIRECTORATE OF WATER DEVELOPMENT URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE DEPARTMENT A brief of ongoing activities for all the WSDFs as at 31st December 2015 Urban Water Supply and Sewerage Department (Ministry of Water and Environment) is developing piped water supply systems and sanitation facilities in small towns (STs) and Rural Growth Centres (RGCs) across the whole country. The funding for these town projects is by the Government of Uganda (GoU) with support from the Germany Development Bank (KfW), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Agency (ADA). Facility/ Programme Towns completed since 2010 Towns under construction Towns under procurement for Towns under design stage Towns under planning up Total Number construction to 2018 WSDF-SW FY2009/10: (19 STs/RGCs): Rwenanura, Kagarama, Omungyenyi, Kyabugimbi, 05 STs/RGCs: 06 STs/RGCs: Kashaka-Bubare, 05 designs; comments from the DRC have Funds have been approved 130 towns Funded with a grant from EU Mutara, Kabira, Kyeibare, Hima, Rugendabara, Rubona, Nyakigumba, Kabale/Kicucu, Nsiika, Kiko, Kainja, Buyamba & been attended to: Kibugu, Kihihi, Katooke, to start designing 31 towns through ADC. Kasunganyanja, Kibito, Rwimi, Rugaaga, Isingiro TC, Mabona, Kyeirumba Sanga; 60% Kambuga, Kyenjojo and Butunduzi. FY2010/11: (11 STs/RGCs): Bwera, Mpondwe, Kiyenje, Ibanda, Bugoye, Rubindi, Kasagama; 10% 02 Faecal sludge treatment plants; 09 designs have been completed: Rwene, Kaihura, Kyarusozi, Kagongo, Kanungu TC Construction contracts have been Lwebitakuli RGC, Butare-Mashonga RGC, Kaliiro; 15% awarded for Ishongoro (in Ibanda) and Nyamunuka RGC, Rwashamaire TC, FY2012/13: (01 STs/RGCs): Kiruhura TC Kasaali-Kyotera (in Rakai). Karago TC, Butogota, Kabuyanda, Kajaho, Nyahuka; 32% and Igorora. FY2013/14: (12 STs/RGCs): Kakyanga RGC, Kazo TC, Lyantonde TC Phase I, Office block 2nd phase; construction Kyempene RGC, Source re-protection for Kanungu TC Water supply and sanitation Kinuka; 08% contract has been awarded. 18 Towns under design: Lwemiyaga scheme, Rutokye RGC, Kinoni-Mbr RGC, Kikagati RGC, Rugaaga RGC Iron Removal RGC, Kyabi RGC, Nyakashaka RGC, Kijura Plant, Kabuga RGC, Kahunge RGC, and Kakuto RGC. Office Block 1st Phase; 75% TC, Rubirizi TC, Kibbuku TC, Kanara TC, Kisinga/Kagando/Kiburara, Kinyamaseke, FY 2014/15: (10 STs/RGCs): Mateete TC, Rushere RGC wells development, Ntusi Kibaale, Bethlehem, Lwamaggwa, Nambirizi, RGC, Lyantonde TC Phase II , Ruti-Rugando extension Phase I, Makanga extension, Kibingo TC, Bitooma, Igorora TC, Bukinda, Rwenkobwa RGC, Muhanga TC, Kinoni-Kiruhura RGC., Kasensero TB. Rushango TC . 02 Public Water Borne Toilets; Rwenkobw & Kinoni-Kiruhura. FY 2015/16: (04 ST/RGCs): • Gasiiza • Nyeihanga • Nyarubungo • Bugongi WSDF-N FY2009/10: Under construction= 8 towns Procurement for construction = 0 Under design= 17towns 31 Proposed towns for 66 Funded with grant from German • Koboko T.C, towns future development: through KFW. • Kuru Dokolo; 76% Bibia/Elegu, Loro Namasale, Bibia/ • Wandi Midigo; 95% Pabbo, Elegu, padibe, Pabbo, Okollo; 90% Zombo T.C Odramacaku, Zombo T.C, FY2010/11: Kalongo; 87% Procurement for Consultancy Acholibur, Acholibur, Rackoko, Agago • Lefori, Pajule; 96% Loro Rackoko, T.C, Barr, Amuru TC, Bala, • Kamdini, Amolatar T.C 50% pabbo Agago T.C Keri, Awach, Barakara, Lamwo-Lokung-Olebi TC, FY2012/13: 11 FORMER IDP camps Aboke, Palabek-Kal, Atiak, • Oyam, 02 system extensions (&): Abia Kole-Molem T.C, Atapara, • Adjumani Kamdini & Oyam On-going Apala Okpotani, Kitgum-matid, FY2013/14: Mucwini Ngai, Iceme, ArraDufile, 02 towns for power-grid extensions (%): Namokora Obongi, Okokoro, Rhino FY 2014/15: Adjumani-Amolatar; 100% Paloga Camp • Omugo, Lagoro • Agweng, Parabongo, water schemes in former • Paidha, Sanitation Infrastrure Under Palabek-Ogil IDP camps for re-sizing/ • Ibuje Construction =52 Omoro conversion:Palenga, • Purongo, Bar-job Alero, Erussi, Alangi, Kati, Household Ecosan 130Demonstration Olilim Kubala, Lodonga, Itula, FY2015/16 Toilets: 35 • Ovujo Institutional VIPs: 10 • Opit • Patongo Public Water Borne: 7 Sanitation and Hygiene: Household Ecosan Demonstration Toilets: 94 Public Sanitation Facilities: VIPs: 27 Water Borne: 13 SDF-E FY2009/2010 5 Towns: 16 Completed Designs: Kidetok(Serere), 92 Funded with grant from EU Amuria TC (amuria) 6No. Towns Water Supply systems under Namagera, Bulegeni, Iziru, Tubur(Soroti), through ADC, and German Construction Kapelebyong, Moroto(Moroto), Kotido(Kotido), Kacheri- Acowa(Amuria), government through KFW. FY 2010/11 Ocapa RGC(Serere) 35%, Luuka Buyende. Lokona(Kotido), Nakiperimoru(Kotido), Namungalwe(Iganga), Tirinyi and Kibuku RGC (Kibuku) TC(Luuka) 90%, Kyere RGC(Serere) 40%, Bugadde(Mayuge), Bwondha(Mayuge), Kibaale(Namutumba), Bukwo TC 75%, Namwiwa(Kaliro), Kibale(Pallisa), Buyaga(Bulambuli), Household Ecosan Toilets 15 Nakapiripirit TC 80%, Idudi(Bugiri), Lumino(Busia), and Bulambuli(Bulambuli), Kagoma RGC (80%) Kadungulu(Serere), Tubur(Soroti), Namayingo(Namayingo), FY 2011/2012 Acowa(Amuria), Amudat(Amudat), Amudat(Amudat), Public water Borne toilets Kidetok(Serere) Ikumbya(Luuka), FY2012/13 – Household Ecosan toilets 25 Kyere 12%, Ocapa 18%, Nakapiripirit 96%, Bugobi(Namutumba), Luuka 97% Mutufu(Sironko), FY 2013/14 10 Under Design and Mobilisation: Binyinyi(Kween), and Kaabong TC (kaabong), Abim TC (Abim), Karenga RGC (Kaabong), Bukedea TC Iki-iki(Budaka) (Bukeadea), Katakwi TC (Katakwi), and Busiu RGC (Mbale), Kapchorwa TC (Kapchorwa), Namungalwe(Iganga), Kachumbala RGC (Bukedea) Kibaale(Namutumba), Lokiteded(Napak), Buyaga(Bulambuli), Bulambuli(Bulambuli), Expansion of FY2014/2015 Namayingo(Namayingo), Ikumbya(Luuka), Kasambira(Kamuli), Namalu RGC (Nakapiripirit), Irundu RGC (Buyende), Matany RGC (Napak), Namutumba Bugobi(Namutumba), Mutufu(Sironko), Namwenda(Kamuli), TB (Namutumba), Ochero RGC (Kaberamaido), Katakwi TC (Katakwi), Suam RGC Binyinyi(Kween), and Iki-iki(Budaka) Bulopa```````(Kamuli) (Bukwo), Kapchorwa TC (Kapchorwa) Mbulamuti RGC (Kamuli) Extensions in some towns Abim, Katakwi, Kachumbala, Namalu and Kaliro Public water borne/ Institutional Toilets Tirinyi, Kibuku, Nagongera, Bukedea, Irundu, Kapchorwa, Kibuku, Karenga, Namutumba, Abim, Kaabong, Ochero Household Ecosan Demo toilets- 60 Irundu, Mbulamuti, Buwuni, Namagera, Kapelebyong, Nakapiripirit, Bukwo and Bulegeni, Kagoma FY 2015/16 Buwuni RGC(Bugiri), Kaliro TC(Kaliro) Public waterborne toilet Buwuni, Kagoma, Namagera, Iziru, Suam Household toilets-18 Ocapa, Kyere, Kachumbala.
Recommended publications
  • Malaba-Elegul/Nimule

    Malaba-Elegul/Nimule

    Northern Corridor Stakeholders Survey September 2013 of Eldoret – Malaba – Elegu/Nimule – Juba Transit Section and South Sudan Consultative Mission The Permanent Secretariat of the Transit Transport Coordination Authority of the Northern Corridor P.O. Box 34068-80118 Mombasa-Kenya Tel: +254 414 470 735 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ttcanc.org Acknowledgements The Permanent Secretariat of the Transit Transport Coordination Authority of the Northern Corridor (NC-TTCA) would like to acknowledge all the public and private sector stakeholders for their contributions towards this survey. We thank the stakeholders consulted for their warm welcome, invaluable insights, information and time. Once again the Secretariat takes this opportunity to thank the Stakeholders who comprised the Survey Team namely; Kenya Revenue Authority, Kenya Ports Authority, Office de Gestion du Fret Multimodal DRC, Kenya National Police Service, South Sudan Chamber of Commerce, Uganda Private Sector Business Representative Mombasa, Kenya International Warehousing and Forwarders Association and the Kenya Transporters Association. Lastly we would like to appreciate the stakeholders who lent a helping hand to the Secretariat in organizing the meetings at the transit nodes during the survey. The Secretariat remains open to correct any errors of fact or interpretation in this document. i Glossary Acronyms: ASYCUDA Automated System for Customs Data C/Agent Customs Agent or Clearing Agent CBTA Cross Border Traders Association CIF Cost Insurance and Freight CFS Container
  • Development of Inclusive Business Models (IBM) for Leveraging Investments and Development in Acholi Sub-Region

    Development of Inclusive Business Models (IBM) for Leveraging Investments and Development in Acholi Sub-Region

    Development of Inclusive Business Models (IBM) for leveraging investments and development in Acholi sub-region Funded by: December 2017 Acknowledgements The authors of this report John Jagwe Ph.D. and Christopher Burke wish to express special thanks to Ms. Susan Toolit Alobo, Martina O’Donaghue and Ian Dolan of Trócaire for the support and feedback rendered in executing this assignment. The authors are also thankful to the respondents interviewed during the course of the research and to the Joint Acholi Sub- Regional Leaders Forum (JASLF) for the constructive inputs made to this work and the Democratic Governance Facility (DGF) for the support necessary to make this research and report possible. ii JASLF/Trócaire – Farmgain IBMs December 2017 Acknowledgement of Authors This report was authored by Dr. John Jagwe and Mr. Christopher Burke of Farmgain Africa Ltd for Trócaire Uganda as part of the overall research project on customary land practices in Acholi iii JASLF/Trócaire – Farmgain IBMs December 2017 Acronyms AAU Amatheon Agri Uganda ACE Area Co-operative Enterprises AVO Assistant Veterinary Officer BAT British America Tobacco DFID Department for International Development FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FCV Flue Cured Virgina ha Hectare HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome IBM Inclusive Business Model IFAD International Foundation for Agricultural Development IFC International Financial Co-operation Mt Metric tons NUAC Northern Uganda Agricultural Centre NUTEC Northern Uganda
  • The Project for Community Development for Promoting Return and Resettlement of Idp in Northern Uganda

    The Project for Community Development for Promoting Return and Resettlement of Idp in Northern Uganda

    OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER AMURU DISTRICT/ NWOYA DISTRICT THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA THE PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR PROMOTING RETURN AND RESETTLEMENT OF IDP IN NORTHERN UGANDA FINAL REPORT MARCH 2011 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NTC INTERNATINAL CO., LTD. EID JR 11-048 Uganda Amuru Location Map of Amuru and Nwoya Districts Location Map of the Target Sites PHOTOs Urgent Pilot Project Amuru District: Multipurpose Hall Outside View Inside View Handing over Ceremony (December 21 2010) Amuru District: Water Supply System Installation of Solar Panel Water Storage facility (For solar powered submersible pump) (30,000lt water tank) i Amuru District: Staff house Staff House Local Dance Team at Handing over Ceremony (1 Block has 2 units) (October 27 2010) Pabbo Sub County: Public Hall Outside view of public hall Handing over Ceremony (December 14 2010) ii Pab Sub County: Staff house Staff House Outside View of Staff House (1 Block has 2 units) (4 Block) Pab Sub County: Water Supply System Installed Solar Panel and Pump House Training on the operation of the system Water Storage Facility Public Tap Stand (40,000lt water tank) (5 stands; 4tap per stand) iii Pilot Project Pilot Project in Pabbo Sub-County Type A model: Improvement of Technical School Project Joint inspection with District Engineer & Outside view of the Workshop District Education Officer Type B Model: Pukwany Village Improvement of Access Road Project River Crossing After the Project Before the Project (No crossing facilities) (Pipe Culver) Road Rehabilitation Before
  • Northern Uganda Nutrition Survey in IDP Camps Gulu District, Northern

    Northern Uganda Nutrition Survey in IDP Camps Gulu District, Northern

    Northern Uganda Nutrition Survey in IDP Camps Gulu District, Northern Uganda Action Against Hunger (ACF-USA) June 2005 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ACF-USA would like to acknowledge the help and support from the following people, without whom this survey would not have been conducted. Thanks to OFDA for their financial support in conducting the survey. Thanks to the District Department of Health Services (DDHS) for their agreement to let us conduct the survey and for their support of our activities within the District. Thanks to all the Camp Leaders, Zonal Leaders, and selected camp representatives who assisted us in the task of data collection. Thanks to the survey teams who worked diligently and professionally for many hours in the hot sun. Last and not least, thanks to the mothers and children, and their families who were kind enough to co- operate with the survey teams, answer personal questions and give up their time to assist us. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 6 I.1 OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................................. 6 I.2 RESULTS.................................................................................................................................................. 6 I.3 RECOMMENDATIONS ..............................................................................................................................
  • The Charcoal Grey Market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan (2021)

    The Charcoal Grey Market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan (2021)

    COMMODITY REPORT BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan SIMONE HAYSOM I MICHAEL McLAGGAN JULIUS KAKA I LUCY MODI I KEN OPALA MARCH 2021 BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan ww Simone Haysom I Michael McLaggan Julius Kaka I Lucy Modi I Ken Opala March 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank everyone who gave their time to be interviewed for this study. They would like to extend particular thanks to Dr Catherine Nabukalu, at the University of Pennsylvania, and Bryan Adkins, at UNEP, for playing an invaluable role in correcting our misperceptions and deepening our analysis. We would also like to thank Nhial Tiitmamer, at the Sudd Institute, for providing us with additional interviews and information from South Sudan at short notice. Finally, we thank Alex Goodwin for excel- lent editing. Interviews were conducted in South Sudan, Uganda and Kenya between February 2020 and November 2020. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Simone Haysom is a senior analyst at the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC), with expertise in urban development, corruption and organized crime, and over a decade of experience conducting qualitative fieldwork in challenging environments. She is currently an associate of the Oceanic Humanities for the Global South research project based at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Ken Opala is the GI-TOC analyst for Kenya. He previously worked at Nation Media Group as deputy investigative editor and as editor-in-chief at the Nairobi Law Monthly. He has won several journalistic awards in his career.
  • Atiak Town Board Proposed Physical Development Plan to Nimule Border Tiak T.I a Rls a Gi Onic St.M

    Atiak Town Board Proposed Physical Development Plan to Nimule Border Tiak T.I a Rls a Gi Onic St.M

    400500.000000 40140010.0000000 401500.000000 40240020.0000000 402500.000000 40340030.0000000 403500.000000 4040040.0000000 404500.000000 ATIAK TOWN BOARD ATIAK TOWN BOARD PROPOSED PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO NIMULE BORDER TIAK T.I A RLS A GI ONIC ST.M K IA 2012-2022 T A II .C H L A N IO T A N Legend R E T IN LOCAL CENTER R E H T O PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY M LOCAL DISTRIBUTOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . LDR . 0 0 0 0 SECONDARY ROAD 3 3 0 0 6 6 0 0 3 3 2 3 3 6 6 3 3 LDR CONTOURS SECONDARY RING ROAD MDR PROPOSED LAND USES PRIMARY ROAD U LC R B A N STREAM A HDR G HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL R IC MDR U L T U MDR R MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL E LDR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN AGRICULTURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 HDR MDR 0 5 5 2 2 INSTITUTIONAL 6 6 3 3 LAND FILL P.TI PROPOSED TERTIARY INSTITUTION P.SS PROPOSED SECONDARY SCHOOL P.PS PROPOSED PRIMARY SCHOOL L O C CIVIC A L C E N T E R PB POLICE BARRACKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 COM 0 2 2 0 0 6 6 0 0 3 3 2 2 PRISON LAND 6 6 3 3 INDUSTRIAL WPS WATER PUMPING STATION URBAN AGRICULTURE MDR COM COMMERCIAL WATER RESERVOIR LDR HOTEL ZONE WR MDR MARKET INDUSTRIAL S AL S.
  • Political Environment Surrounding the Land Conflict in Amuru District Acholi Sub-Region

    Political Environment Surrounding the Land Conflict in Amuru District Acholi Sub-Region

    POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT SURROUNDING THE LAND CONFLICT IN AMURU DISTRICT ACHOLI SUB-REGION Muganzi Edson Rusetuka Journal of Public Policy and Administration ISSN 2520-5315 (Online) Vol 4, Issue 2, No.1, pp 1 - 13, 2019 www.iprjb.org POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT SURROUNDING THE LAND CONFLICT IN AMURU DISTRICT ACHOLI SUB-REGION 1*Muganzi Edson Rusetuka Post Graduate Student: University for Peace *Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected] Abstract Purpose: To examine the political environment surrounding the land conflict in Amuru district Acholi sub-region. Methodology: The study employed a descriptive research design involving both qualitative and quantitative studies where 5 focus group discussions with 40 women and 40 men from Pabbo, Amuru and Lamogi sub counties of Amuru district and key interviews with 4 participants from Area Land Committee members and other leaders in the above sub counties. Findings: The findings indicate that over 90% of rural land is understood by the people who live there as under communal control/ownership. These communal land owners are variously understood as clans, sub-clans or extended families. Ethnic based land tensions fostered insecurity and instability in the Amuru as people could not walk around freely, access their gardens, were displaced and this in turn affected their ability to make a living through accessing the land. I also found that many women had relational access to land through their marriage and relationship with male kin and this seemed to give them fragile land rights. Men on the other hand had firm control over land and made final decisions relating to sales and land use.
  • The Legacy of the Lord's Resistance Army in Northern Uganda

    The Legacy of the Lord's Resistance Army in Northern Uganda

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Bridges, Sarah; Scott, Douglas Working Paper Early childhood health during conflict: The legacy of the Lord's Resistance Army in Northern Uganda CREDIT Research Paper, No. 19/11 Provided in Cooperation with: The University of Nottingham, Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT) Suggested Citation: Bridges, Sarah; Scott, Douglas (2019) : Early childhood health during conflict: The legacy of the Lord's Resistance Army in Northern Uganda, CREDIT Research Paper, No. 19/11, The University of Nottingham, Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT), Nottingham This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/210862 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
  • LAND CONFLICT MONITORING and MAPPING TOOL for the Acholi Sub-Region

    LAND CONFLICT MONITORING and MAPPING TOOL for the Acholi Sub-Region

    LAND CONFLICT MONITORING and MAPPING TOOL for the Acholi Sub-region Final Report - March 2013 Research conducted under the United Nations Peacebuilding Programme in Uganda by Human Rights Focus EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In a context of land disputes as a potential major conflict driver, the UN Peacebuilding Programme (PBP) commissioned Human Rights Focus (HURIFO) to develop a tool to monitor and map land disputes throughout Acholi. The overall purpose of this project is to obtain and analyse data that enhance understanding of land disputes, and through this to inform policy, advocacy, and other relevant interventions on land rights, security, and access in the sub-region. Two rounds of quantitative data collection have been undertaken comprehensively across the sub-region, in February/March and September/October 2012, along with further qualitative work and analysis of relevant literature. In order to maximise its contribution to urgently needed understanding of land disputes in Acholi, the project has sought to map and collect data not simply on the numbers and types of land disputes, but also on the substrata: the nature of the landholdings on which disputes are taking place; how land is used and controlled, and by whom. KEY FINDINGS • Over 90% of rural land is understood by the people who live there as under communal control/ownership. These communal land owners are variously understood as clans, sub-clans or extended families. • The overall number of discrete rural land disputes is declining significantly. Findings suggest that disputes are being resolved at a rate of about 50% over a six-month period. First-round research indicated that total land disputes between September/ October 2011 and February/March 2012 numbered about 4,300; second-round data identified just over 2,100 total disputes over the period between April and August/ September 2012.
  • Northern Uganda Land Study Analysis of Post Conflict

    Northern Uganda Land Study Analysis of Post Conflict

    NORTHERN UGANDA LAND STUDY ANALYSIS OF POST CONFLICT LAND POLICY AND LAND ADMINISTRATION: A SURVEY OF IDP RETURN AND RESETTLEMENT ISSUES AND LESSON: ACHOLI AND LANGO REGIONS By : Team Members: Margaret A. Rugadya (Lead Consultant) Eddie Nsamba-Gayiiya Herbert Kamusiime World Bank UPI: 267367 Consultant Surveyors and Associates for Associates for Development Planners Development Tel. +414-541988, +0772-497145, Kampala Kampala +0712-497145 Email: [email protected] February, 2008 For the World Bank, to input into Northern Uganda Peace, Recovery and Development Plan (PRDP) and the Draft National Land Policy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the second in a series of land studies for northern Uganda, whose core objective is to inform the Plan for Recovery and Development of Northern Uganda (PRDP) and the National Land Policy. It builds on the work of the first phase conducted in Teso region to present a more quantitative analysis of trends on disputes and claims on land before displacement, during displacement and emerging trends or occurrences on return for Acholi and Lango sub-regions. The key findings in the Teso study are that there is a high level of distrust towards the Central Government’s intentions toward land; customary tenure has evolved and adapted to changing circumstances but remains to be seen as a legitimate form of tenure; there was not a high prevalence of land disputes; the statutory and customary institutional framework for land administration and justice has been severely weakened; and vulnerable groups such as women and children have been marginalized during the return process. However, the Teso region has been one of the most secure regions during the conflict and has experienced very short periods of displacement and as such does not provide a good marker for the situation in the rest of northern Uganda.
  • Amuru District - Access to Health Services Reference Date: June 2007

    Amuru District - Access to Health Services Reference Date: June 2007

    District, Sub counties, Heath centres,IDP Camps, Settlement sites, Tranpsort Network & Water bodies Amuru District - Access to Health Services Reference Date: June 2007 UGANDA LEGEND Data Sources Prepared and compiled by IMU OCHA-Uganda N District Border DDisatrticat SAuothuorrictiess Printed: 07 June 2006 _____________________________ W E AMURU NUDC The boundaries and names shown Sub County Border on this map approximate and do S WFP imply official endorsement/ Parish Border UNHCR acceptance by United Nations. SOUTHERN SUDAN IOM Kampala Water Bodies WHO/Health Cluster OCHA Email: [email protected] Road Network Railway FOOD AID DISTRIBUTION FIGURES - WFP Bibia [% District H/Qs Population: 288,062 (May 2007) PÆ OGILI Name: Population: Name: Population: IDP Camp DZAIPI Bibia 01- Agung 2,197 18- LanAgDoROl PI 3,422 Settlement site KITGUM DISTRICT 02- Alero 12,399 19- Lolim 573 PÆ Health Centre 03- Amuru 35,134 20- Olinga 1,565 ATIAK 04- Anaka 20,676 21- OlwaADl JUMAN TC 16,628 CIFORO Okidi Access to Health Services 05- Aparanga 2,955 22- Olwiyo 2,616 Pacilo within 5 km radius. 06- Atiak 19,980 23- Omee I 4,629 Abalokodi 07- Awer 14,997 24- Omee II 3,253 Pacilo 08- Bibia 5,133 25- Otong 1,572 09- Bira 3,105 26- Pabbo 47,173 PAKELLE Parwacha NOMANS 10- Corner Nwoya 5,279 27- Pagak 9,577 Okidi 11- Guruguru 3,360 Kal 28- Palukere 911 Atiak 12- Jeng-gari 4,292 29- Parabongo 13,672 PÆ OFUA 13- Kaladima 1,817 30- Pawel 3,884 Pupwonya 14- Keyo 6,606 31- Purongo 8,141 Palukere 15- Koch Goma 13,324 32- Tegot 442 Olamnyungo Palukere 16- Labongogali
  • Northern Uganda

    Northern Uganda

    United Nations s/2006/29 Security Council Distr.: General 19 January 2006 Original: English Letter dated 16 January 2006 from the Charge d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Uganda to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council Reference is made to the letter dated 5 January 2006 from the Permanent Representative of Canada to the United Nations addressed to you (S/2006/13). On instructions from my Government, I have the honour to forward to you herewith a letter from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Uganda transmitting an official position paper of the Government of Uganda on the humanitarian situation in northern Uganda (see annex). The Government of Uganda is giving a factual account of what is happening in northern Uganda and what the Government of Uganda is doing to address the situation on the ground. Any call for the situation in northern Uganda to be put on the agenda of the Security Council is therefore unjustified. I would be grateful if the present letter and its annex were circulated as a document of the Security Council. (Signed) Catherine Otiti Charge d’affaires a.i. 00-?1473 I: 240106 ,111 lllllll.ililII 111111 II Annex to the letter dated 16 January 2006 from the Charge d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Uganda to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council Attached is a synopsis of the humanitarian situation in northern Uganda (see appendix). It gives a historical background of the problem of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and the ensuing humanitarian situation.