Northern Uganda Nutrition Survey in IDP Camps Gulu District, Northern

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Northern Uganda Nutrition Survey in IDP Camps Gulu District, Northern Northern Uganda Nutrition Survey in IDP Camps Gulu District, Northern Uganda Action Against Hunger (ACF-USA) June 2005 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ACF-USA would like to acknowledge the help and support from the following people, without whom this survey would not have been conducted. Thanks to OFDA for their financial support in conducting the survey. Thanks to the District Department of Health Services (DDHS) for their agreement to let us conduct the survey and for their support of our activities within the District. Thanks to all the Camp Leaders, Zonal Leaders, and selected camp representatives who assisted us in the task of data collection. Thanks to the survey teams who worked diligently and professionally for many hours in the hot sun. Last and not least, thanks to the mothers and children, and their families who were kind enough to co- operate with the survey teams, answer personal questions and give up their time to assist us. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 6 I.1 OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................................. 6 I.2 RESULTS.................................................................................................................................................. 6 I.3 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 6 II INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 8 II.1 NORTHERN UGANDAN CONTEXT............................................................................................................. 8 II.2 GULU DISTRICT IDP CAMPS.................................................................................................................... 8 II.3 ACF-USA ACTIVITIES IN GULU DISTRICT .............................................................................................. 9 III OBJECTIVES........................................................................................................................................... 9 IV METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................... 9 IV.1 SURVEY DESIGN ...................................................................................................................................... 9 IV.2 THE NUTRITIONAL ANTHROPMETRIC SURVEY....................................................................................... 10 IV.3 TRAINING OF THE NUTRITION SURVEY TEAMS...................................................................................... 10 IV.4 DATA COLLECTION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES ......................................................................... 11 IV.4.1 Children from 6 to 59 months:...................................................................................................... 11 IV.4.2 Children less than 6 months: ........................................................................................................ 11 IV.5 MORTALITY........................................................................................................................................... 12 IV.6 CUT-OFF GUIDELINES AND FORMULAS USED ........................................................................................ 12 IV.6.1 Weight for Height Index................................................................................................................ 12 IV.6.2 MUAC........................................................................................................................................... 13 IV.7 SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION.................................................................................................................... 13 IV.8 CONSTRAINTS........................................................................................................................................ 13 V RESULTS.................................................................................................................................................... 14 V.1 AGE AND GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF CHILDREN 6 TO 59 MONTHS.......................................................... 14 V.2 WEIGHT FOR HEIGHT INDEX (W/H) OR ACUTE MALNUTRITION ........................................................... 15 V.2.1 Acute Malnutrition in Z-scores ..................................................................................................... 15 V.2.2 Acute Malnutrition in Percentage of Median ............................................................................... 16 V.3 MUAC ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................. 17 V.4 MEASLES VACCINATION COVERAGE ..................................................................................................... 17 V.5 NUTRITION INFORMATION ON INFANTS UNDER 6 MONTHS .................................................................... 18 V.5.1 Evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition ...............................................................................18 V.5.2 Feeding practices.......................................................................................................................... 18 V.5.3 Mortality ....................................................................................................................................... 19 VI DISCUSSION.......................................................................................................................................... 19 VII RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................................................ 21 VIII APPENDICES......................................................................................................................................... 23 VIII.1 APPENDIX 1: LOCAL EVENTS CALENDAR TO CALCULATE AGE IN MONTHS...................................... 23 VIII.2 APPENDIX 2: CLUSTER SELECTION, GULU CAMPS 2005..................................................................... 25 4 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 GAM AND SAM BY AGE GROUP IN Z-SCORES, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005........................... 6 TABLE 2 ACUTE MALNUTRITION BY AGE GROUP IN % OF THE MEDIAN, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005. .. 6 TABLE 3 ACUTE MALNUTRITION CUT-OFF FOR DEFINITION OF POPULATION NUTRITIONAL STATUS...................... 12 TABLE 4 MUAC CUT-OFFS FOR DEFINITION OF MALNUTRITION STATUS............................................................... 13 TABLE 5 MORTALITY RATE CUT-OFF FOR DEFINITION OF STATUS OF THE POPULATION......................................... 13 TABLE 6 AGE AND GENDER DISTRIBUTION 6-59 MONTHS, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005. ..................... 14 TABLE 7 WEIGHT FOR HEIGHT DISTRIBUTION BY AGE IN Z-SCORES, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005....... 15 TABLE 8 WEIGHT FOR HEIGHT AND OEDEMA DISTRIBUTION, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005................... 15 TABLE 9 GAM AND SAM BY AGE GROUP IN Z-SCORES, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005......................... 15 TABLE 10 GAM AND SAM DISTRIBUTION BY GENDER IN Z-SCORES, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005...... 15 TABLE 11 WEIGHT FOR HEIGHT DISTRIBUTION BY AGE IN PERCENTAGE OF MEDIAN, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005. .................................................................................................................................................... 16 TABLE 12 GAM AND SAM BY AGE GROUP IN PERCENTAGE OF MEDIAN, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16 TABLE 13 GAM AND SAM DISTRIBUTION BY GENDER IN % OF THE MEDIAN, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005.............................................................................................................................................................. 17 TABLE 14 MUAC DISTRIBUTION IN UNDER-5 POPULATION, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005. ................... 17 TABLE 15 MEASLES VACCINATION COVERAGE, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005. ..................................... 17 TABLE 16 AGE AND GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF INFANTS MORE THAN 49.0 CM HEIGHT, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005 ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 TABLE 17 PREVALENCE OF ACUTE MALNUTRITION AMONG INFANTS MORE THAN 49.0CM HEIGHT, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005..................................................................................................................................... 18 TABLE 18 LONGITUDINAL COMPARISON OF ACF SURVEY WASTING RESULTS IN Z-SCORES, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005..................................................................................................................................... 19 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 DEMOGRAPHICS OF SURVEY SAMPLE (AGE AND SEX), GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005. ........... 14 FIGURE 2 WEIGHT FOR HEIGHT DISTRIBUTION IN Z-SCORES, GULU DISTRICT, UGANDA, JUNE 2005. ................. 16 5 List of Acronyms ACF-USA Action Against Hunger-USA CHW Community Health Workers CI Confidence Interval DDHS District Department
Recommended publications
  • The Project for Community Development for Promoting Return and Resettlement of Idp in Northern Uganda
    OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER AMURU DISTRICT/ NWOYA DISTRICT THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA THE PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR PROMOTING RETURN AND RESETTLEMENT OF IDP IN NORTHERN UGANDA FINAL REPORT MARCH 2011 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NTC INTERNATINAL CO., LTD. EID JR 11-048 Uganda Amuru Location Map of Amuru and Nwoya Districts Location Map of the Target Sites PHOTOs Urgent Pilot Project Amuru District: Multipurpose Hall Outside View Inside View Handing over Ceremony (December 21 2010) Amuru District: Water Supply System Installation of Solar Panel Water Storage facility (For solar powered submersible pump) (30,000lt water tank) i Amuru District: Staff house Staff House Local Dance Team at Handing over Ceremony (1 Block has 2 units) (October 27 2010) Pabbo Sub County: Public Hall Outside view of public hall Handing over Ceremony (December 14 2010) ii Pab Sub County: Staff house Staff House Outside View of Staff House (1 Block has 2 units) (4 Block) Pab Sub County: Water Supply System Installed Solar Panel and Pump House Training on the operation of the system Water Storage Facility Public Tap Stand (40,000lt water tank) (5 stands; 4tap per stand) iii Pilot Project Pilot Project in Pabbo Sub-County Type A model: Improvement of Technical School Project Joint inspection with District Engineer & Outside view of the Workshop District Education Officer Type B Model: Pukwany Village Improvement of Access Road Project River Crossing After the Project Before the Project (No crossing facilities) (Pipe Culver) Road Rehabilitation Before
    [Show full text]
  • LAND CONFLICT MONITORING and MAPPING TOOL for the Acholi Sub-Region
    LAND CONFLICT MONITORING and MAPPING TOOL for the Acholi Sub-region Final Report - March 2013 Research conducted under the United Nations Peacebuilding Programme in Uganda by Human Rights Focus EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In a context of land disputes as a potential major conflict driver, the UN Peacebuilding Programme (PBP) commissioned Human Rights Focus (HURIFO) to develop a tool to monitor and map land disputes throughout Acholi. The overall purpose of this project is to obtain and analyse data that enhance understanding of land disputes, and through this to inform policy, advocacy, and other relevant interventions on land rights, security, and access in the sub-region. Two rounds of quantitative data collection have been undertaken comprehensively across the sub-region, in February/March and September/October 2012, along with further qualitative work and analysis of relevant literature. In order to maximise its contribution to urgently needed understanding of land disputes in Acholi, the project has sought to map and collect data not simply on the numbers and types of land disputes, but also on the substrata: the nature of the landholdings on which disputes are taking place; how land is used and controlled, and by whom. KEY FINDINGS • Over 90% of rural land is understood by the people who live there as under communal control/ownership. These communal land owners are variously understood as clans, sub-clans or extended families. • The overall number of discrete rural land disputes is declining significantly. Findings suggest that disputes are being resolved at a rate of about 50% over a six-month period. First-round research indicated that total land disputes between September/ October 2011 and February/March 2012 numbered about 4,300; second-round data identified just over 2,100 total disputes over the period between April and August/ September 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Amuru District - Access to Health Services Reference Date: June 2007
    District, Sub counties, Heath centres,IDP Camps, Settlement sites, Tranpsort Network & Water bodies Amuru District - Access to Health Services Reference Date: June 2007 UGANDA LEGEND Data Sources Prepared and compiled by IMU OCHA-Uganda N District Border DDisatrticat SAuothuorrictiess Printed: 07 June 2006 _____________________________ W E AMURU NUDC The boundaries and names shown Sub County Border on this map approximate and do S WFP imply official endorsement/ Parish Border UNHCR acceptance by United Nations. SOUTHERN SUDAN IOM Kampala Water Bodies WHO/Health Cluster OCHA Email: [email protected] Road Network Railway FOOD AID DISTRIBUTION FIGURES - WFP Bibia [% District H/Qs Population: 288,062 (May 2007) PÆ OGILI Name: Population: Name: Population: IDP Camp DZAIPI Bibia 01- Agung 2,197 18- LanAgDoROl PI 3,422 Settlement site KITGUM DISTRICT 02- Alero 12,399 19- Lolim 573 PÆ Health Centre 03- Amuru 35,134 20- Olinga 1,565 ATIAK 04- Anaka 20,676 21- OlwaADl JUMAN TC 16,628 CIFORO Okidi Access to Health Services 05- Aparanga 2,955 22- Olwiyo 2,616 Pacilo within 5 km radius. 06- Atiak 19,980 23- Omee I 4,629 Abalokodi 07- Awer 14,997 24- Omee II 3,253 Pacilo 08- Bibia 5,133 25- Otong 1,572 09- Bira 3,105 26- Pabbo 47,173 PAKELLE Parwacha NOMANS 10- Corner Nwoya 5,279 27- Pagak 9,577 Okidi 11- Guruguru 3,360 Kal 28- Palukere 911 Atiak 12- Jeng-gari 4,292 29- Parabongo 13,672 PÆ OFUA 13- Kaladima 1,817 30- Pawel 3,884 Pupwonya 14- Keyo 6,606 31- Purongo 8,141 Palukere 15- Koch Goma 13,324 32- Tegot 442 Olamnyungo Palukere 16- Labongogali
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Uganda
    United Nations s/2006/29 Security Council Distr.: General 19 January 2006 Original: English Letter dated 16 January 2006 from the Charge d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Uganda to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council Reference is made to the letter dated 5 January 2006 from the Permanent Representative of Canada to the United Nations addressed to you (S/2006/13). On instructions from my Government, I have the honour to forward to you herewith a letter from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Uganda transmitting an official position paper of the Government of Uganda on the humanitarian situation in northern Uganda (see annex). The Government of Uganda is giving a factual account of what is happening in northern Uganda and what the Government of Uganda is doing to address the situation on the ground. Any call for the situation in northern Uganda to be put on the agenda of the Security Council is therefore unjustified. I would be grateful if the present letter and its annex were circulated as a document of the Security Council. (Signed) Catherine Otiti Charge d’affaires a.i. 00-?1473 I: 240106 ,111 lllllll.ililII 111111 II Annex to the letter dated 16 January 2006 from the Charge d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Uganda to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council Attached is a synopsis of the humanitarian situation in northern Uganda (see appendix). It gives a historical background of the problem of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and the ensuing humanitarian situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development for Amuru and Nwoya Districts
    PART 1: RURAL ROAD MASTER PLANNIN G IN AMURU AND NWOYA DISTRICTS SECTION 2: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR AMURU AND NWOYA DISTRICTS Project for Rural Road Network Planning in Northern Uganda Final Report Vol.2: Main Report 3. PRESENT SITUATION OF AMURU AND NWOYA DISTRICTS 3.1 Natural Conditions (1) Location Amuru and Nwoya Districts are located in northern Uganda. These districts are bordered by Sudan in the north and eight Ugandan Districts on the other sides (Gulu, Lamwo, Adjumani, Arua, Nebbi, Bulisa, Masindi and Oyam). (2) Land Area The total land area of Amuru and Nwoya Districts is about 9,022 sq. km which is 3.7 % of that of Uganda. It is relatively difficult for the local government to administer this vast area of the district. (3) Rivers The Albert Nile flows along the western border of these districts and the Victoria Nile flows along their southern borders as shown in Figure 3.1.2. Within Amuru and Nwoya Districts, there are six major rivers, namely the Unyama River, the Ayugi River, the Omee River, the Aswa River, Tangi River and the Ayago River. These rivers are major obstacles to movement of people and goods, especially during the rainy season. (4) Altitude The altitude ranges between 600 and 1,200 m above sea level. The altitude of the south- western area that is a part of Western Rift Valley is relatively low and ranges between 600 and 800 m above sea level. Many wild animals live near the Albert Nile in the western part of Amuru and Nwoya Districts and near the Victoria Nile in the southern part of Nwoya District because of a favourable climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Science in Humanitarian Action
    Social Science in Humanitarian Action www.socialscienceinaction.org Cross-border dynamics and healthcare in West Nile, Uganda Since the start of the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in August 2018, one single episode of Ebola has been reported within Uganda. A family travelled from Uganda to Mabalako Health Zone in North Kivu, DRC, to attend the funeral of their grandfather on 1 June 2019 (who was confirmed as having Ebola, on 2 June). They crossed back from DRC into Kasese District on 10 June, through the Bwera border post and sought medical care at Kagando hospital. The five-year-old grandson was symptomatic and, suspected of having Ebola, was transferred to Bwera Ebola Treatment Unit (ETU). The Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) confirmed that he had Ebola on 11 June, along with two other family members, his 50-year-old grandmother and three- year-old brother who were both also admitted to Bwera ETU. All three died. As of 26 June, 108 exposed contacts had been identified and were monitored daily. With no new cases or deaths reported, Uganda successfully completed its first 21-day follow-up period on 3 July 2019.1 On 30 June 2019, a case (mother of five children infected with Ebola, two of whom had already died) was confirmed in Ariwara Health Zone, Ituri Province, having travelled overland from Beni (460km south of Ariwara). This was the first confirmed case in this health zone. At the time of writing (5 July 2019), 177 family contacts had been listed, and 40 had already been vaccinated.
    [Show full text]
  • “Between Two Fires”
    “BETWEEN TWO FIRES” THE PLIGHT OF IDPs IN NORTHERN UGANDA: The human rights situation in the “protected camps” in Gulu District, Northern Uganda © Human Rights Focus 2002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Human Rights Focus (HURIFO) with much gratitude wishes to acknowledge the full co- operation received from all the stakeholders which made it’s work easy when monitoring human rights situation in the Internally Displaced Persons camps in Gulu district. The project, which took about a year to reach a report dissemination level, was quite involving. It involved information gathering through oral interview with the victims and/or their relatives including eyewitnesses; sieving of the gathered information and packaging. Community leaders like the local councils at various levels as well as camp leaders rendered quite an invaluable assistance, which needs to be recognised and accordingly appreciated. Equally worthy of appreciation is the financial support to kick start the project received from Human Rights Watch (HRW), without which the project could have started as late as November 1 2000, when the major funder Ford Foundation came in. Last but not least the funding support from the Ford Foundation was an impetus to the two year project, which it’s first report (product) we are quite pleased to come out with now. Where as it is not possible to thank all those individuals and organisations that assisted Human Rights Focus in one way or the other in pushing this project forward, special gratitude recognition and appreciation, however, must be made of a person like Julianne Kippenberg of Human Rights Watch without whose technical support we couldn’t have come this far, and organisations such as Human Rights Watch and indeed our funder The Ford Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • UG-IDP-12 A3 07July09 Amuru District IDP Camps & Return Sites
    IMU, UNOCHA Uganda http://www.ugandaclusters.ug AMURU DISTRICT: IDP Camps and Return Sites Population (May 2009) http://ochaonline.un.org Moyo e Uganda Overview Moyo Sudan SUDAN Congo (Dem. Rep) Bibia Kenya Adropi Dzaipi Kitgum Tanzania Rwanda Adjumani ATIAK Population by site Vilages 15904 Transit sites 3907 IDP Camps 11500 Returnees 19811 Oroko Atiak Pakelle Ciforo Palukere Adjumani Ofua Palaro Population by site Pawel Gulu Vilages 19457 Bira Transit sites 10343 Olinga IDP Camps 21604 Returnees 29800 Lugore Patiko- PABBO Otong Ajulu Pabbo Omee Awach Upper Jeng- Gari Population by site Vilages 29783 Cet Kana Lukodi Transit sites 4572 Population by site IDP Camps 13212 Parabongo Vilages 32842 Returnees 34355 AMURU Transit sites 8159 a IDP Camps 10897 LAMOGI Omee Returnees 41001 Coope Lower Mon Roc Awer Olwal Pagak Labongo- Kaladima Ogali Amuru Unyama Keyo Lacor Population by site Alokolum Vilages 15546 Langol Transit sites 12168 Te-tugu IDP Camps 1757 Koro- Returnees 12168 abili ALERO Alero Ongako Amuru Corner Nwoya Koch Palenga Goma Anaka Wii Anaka Bobi Tegot Wii ANAKA Lolim Anono Aparanga Population by site Purongo Olwiyo Vilages 12873 Awoo Transit sites 1449 IDP Camps 9348 Okwir Minakulu Nebbi Agung Returnees 14322 PURONGO KOCH GOMA Population by site Vilages 5819 Transit sites 1487 Population by site IDP Camps 4880 Vilages 18082 Returnees 7306 Transit sites 2046 IDP Camps 2792 Oyam Returnees 20128 Masindi AMURU DISTRICT Total Sub-counties 8 Parishes 51 Villages 114 IDP Camps 33 Return Sites 99 Villages 150,306 Popula Transit sites 44,131 tion in IDP Camps 75,990 Total Returnees 178,891 Data Sources: This map is a work in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulu District Landmine/ERW Victims Survey Report
    Gulu District Landmine/ERW Victims Survey Report May 2006 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 SELECTED DEFINITIONS FROM IMAS GLOSSARY ---------------------------------------------- 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ------------------------------------------------------ 10 1.1 Presence of mines/ERW in Northern Uganda ------------------------------------ 10 1.2 Rationale and Objective of the research. ------------------------------------------ 11 2. RESEARCH METHODS AND OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------------------ 12 2.1 Study design and Population ---------------------------------------------------------- 12 2.2 Survey preparation and Training ----------------------------------------------------- 12 2.3 Sample size -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 2.4 Data collection --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 3. RESULTS AND FINDINGS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 3.1 Study Profile ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 3.2 Demographic characteristics ---------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH and WASH PROGRAMS Projections for 2008 in Northern Uganda
    HEALTH AND WASH PROGRAMS Projections for 2008 in Northern Uganda The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has been present in Uganda since 1979 and has a field presence in five northern districts of Gulu, Oyam, Amuru, Kitgum and Pader. Christian Kettiger/ICRC ICRC’s Dr. Willy Mukungi talks to patients waiting for consultations at Kitgum Hospital - November 2007. ICRC Health program for 2008 The ICRC will continue its support to 14 health centres and Committees (HUMC) will be empowered and trained to enhance one hospital in Northern Uganda in 2008. community responsibility in health, an essential aspect of a PHC system as articulated in the Bamako Initiative. Since the North of Uganda has seen positive political devel- opments (thanks to the ongoing peace talks between the The ICRC is involved in 14 health centres II and III, spread across Uganda government and the Lord’s Resistance Army), the the four districts of Acholiland: ICRC’s health programme aims to bridge the gap between emergency response and development funds to govern- a) Pawel, Bibia and Tegot health centres in Amuru district mental institutions. b) Labworomor and Lugore health centres in Gulu district c) Lagot, Dibolyec and Anaka health centres in Kitgum Primary Health Care (PHC) comprehensive approach district d) Omot, Alim, Arum, Awere, Lagile and Porogali in Pader The ICRC’s strategy is to reinforce the efforts of district health district. authorities in their work aimed at redeploying a comprehensive primary health care network in their territories. This strategy in- According to the level of each health centre, the ICRC guaran- cludes capacity building of relevant staff, training and/or super- tees access to safe and clean water and, with the support of the vision, as well as regular medicine refurbishment.
    [Show full text]
  • N Uganda MOH Survey Report July 2005 Print Version With
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH Health and mortality survey among internally displaced persons in Gulu, Kitgum and Pader districts, northern Uganda July 2005 Internally displaced persons health and mortality survey, Uganda, 2005 Executive summary I. Background In northern Uganda, nearly two decades of conflict have resulted in the internal displacement of up to two million persons. In Gulu, Kitgum and Pader Districts, the most affected by violence, nearly 90% of the population had relocated to camps as of 2005. The Government of Uganda’s national policy for internally displaced persons (IDPs) calls, among others, for provision of medical care and water and sanitation to all IDPs by both central and local government, and entitles them to security of person and property. The Office of the Prime Minister is tasked with advocating on behalf of IDPs and sharing information nationally and internationally on their plight. In 2005, the Ministry of Health of Uganda and the United Nations Childrens’ Fund (UNICEF) requested assistance from the World Health Organization (WHO) to assess the health status of IDPs in the three Districts. The study was led by the Ministry of Health and WHO in partnership with the offices of the District Director of Health Services of Gulu, Kitgum and Pader, UNICEF, the UN World Food Programme, the UN Population Fund, and the International Rescue Committee. Study objectives were: § primary: to estimate crude mortality rate (CMR) and under 5 mortality rate (U5MR) in the period between 1 January 2005 and the survey date (July 2005) among populations now living in IDP camps, recognised or unrecognised at the time of the survey, in Gulu, Kitgum, and Pader districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership, Resettlement and Accountability
    ADVISORY CONSORTIUM ON CONFLICT SENSITIVITY (ACCS) OWNERSHIP, RESETTLEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY THE ELEGU LAND DISPUTE IN NORTHERN UGANDA A SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS September 2012 With Funding Support from: The UK – Department for International Development 1 About Refugee Law Project (RLP) The Refugee Law Project (RLP) seeks to ensure fundamental human rights for all, including; asylum seekers, refugees, and internally displaced persons within Uganda. RLP envision a country that treats all people within its borders with the same standards of respect and social justice. We work to see that all people living in Uganda, as specified under national and international law, are treated with the fairness and consideration due fellow human beings. The Refugee Law Project, School of Law Makerere University works in several parts of Uganda, and has several projects and programmes with offices in Kampala, Kotido, Gulu and Kitgum. About the Advisory Consortium on Conflict Sensitivity (ACCS) The Advisory Consortium on Conflict Sensitivity (ACCS) is a three member consortium that brings together Refugee Law Project, International Alert and Saferworld. The consortium was established to support the operationalisation of the UK Department for International Development (DFID) programming “to ensure that the programme does no harm, and that the overall process addresses the drivers of conflict and delivers tangible peacebuilding results” through ongoing audits and analysis of recovery-related interventions and those that are DFID funded. The overall aim of ACCS is to assist DFID and implementing partners in strengthening the potential of the PRDP and recovery process to address the causes of conflict and contribute to sustainable peace and stability. Under ACCS, RLP is leading on contextual analysis of the overall recovery process (focusing on conflict indicators, issues and dynamics), and early warning as and when necessary.
    [Show full text]