DOCSLIB.ORG

European Wildcat (Felis Silvestris Silvestris)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Wildcat (Felis Silvestris Silvestris) European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) Reference List 1. Aliev F. 1973. The Caucasian black cat, Felis silvestris caucasica Satunin, 1905. Säugetierk. Mitt. 22,142-145. 2. Anile S., Bizzarri L. & Ragni B. 2010. Estimation of European wildcat population size in Sicily (Italy) using camera trapping and capture-recapture analyses. Italian Journal of Zoology 77, 241–246. 3. Anile S., Amico C. & Ragni B. 2012. Population density estimation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) in Sicily using camera trapping. Wild. Biol. Pract. 8(1), 1–12. 4. Anile S., Ragni B., Randi E., Mattucci F. & Rovero F. 2014. Wildcat population density on the Etna volcano, Italy: a comparison of density estimation methods. Journal of Zoology 283, 252–261. 5. Anile S., Bizzarri L., Lacrimini M., Sforzi A., Ragni B. & Devillard S. 2017. Home-range size of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris): a report from two areas in Central Italy. Mammalia 82(1), 1-11. 6. Anile S., Devillard S., Kent Nielsen C. & Lo Valvo M. 2020. Record of a 10-year old European wildcat Felis silvestris silvestris Schreber, 1777 (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae) from Mt. Etna, Siciliy, Italy. Journal of Threatened Taxa 12(2), 15272–15275. 7. Apostolico F., Vercillo F., La Porta G. & Ragni B. 2016. Long-term changes in diet and trophic niche of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) in Italy. Mammal Research 61(2), 109–119. 8. Arrighi J. & Salotti M. 1988. Le chat sauvage en Corse. Confirmation de sa présence et approche taxonomique. Mammalia 52(1),123–125. 9. Artois M. 1985. Utilisation de l’espace et du temps chez le renard (Vulpes vulpes) et le chat forestier (Felis silvestris) en Lorraine. Gibier Faune Sauvage 3, 33-57. 10. Aymerich M. 1982. Comparative study of the diet of the pardel lynx (Lynx pardina Temminck, 1824) and the wildcat (Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777) in the central Iberian peninsula. Mammalia 46, 515– 521. 11. Balharry D. & Daniels M. 1993. Wildcat recovery programme in Scotland: wildcat survey 1983-1987. In Seminar on the biology and conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris), Nancy, France, 23–25 September 1992. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, pp. 102–110. 12. Beaumont M., Barratt E. M., Gottelli D., Kitchener A. C., Daniels M. J., Pritchard J. K. & Bruford M. W. 2001. Genetic diversity and introgression in the Scottish wildcat. Molecular Ecology 10, 319–336. 13. Beugin M.-P., Leblanc G., Queney G., Natoli E. & Pontier D. 2016. Female in the inside, male in the outside: insights into the spatial organization of a European wildcat population. Conservation Genetics 17(6), 1405-1415. 14. Bewick T. 1807. A general history of the quadrupeds. Bewick and Hodgson, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. 15. Breitenmoser U., Lanz T. & Breitenmoser-Würsten C. 2019. Conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the conservation status and assessment of conservation activities. IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group, Muri b. Bern, Switzerland. 68 pp. 16. Büttner K. & Worel G. 1990. Wiedereinbürgerung des europäischen Wildkatze in Bayern - ein Projekt des Bundes Naturschutz in Bayern. Waldhygiene 18,169–176. 17. Campbell R. D. 2015. Spatial ecology of the Scottish wildcat. Final report. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Oxford University, UK. 105 pp. 18. Canters K. J., Thissen J. B. M., van Diepenbeek A., Jansman H. A. H. & Goutbeek K. 2005. The wildcat (Felis silvestris) finally recorded in the Neatherlands. Lutra 48(2), 67–90. 19. Clark J. M. 1976. Variations in coat colour gene frequencies and selection in the cats of Scotland. Genetica 46, 401–412. 20. Clutton-Brock J. 1981. Domesticated animals from early times. London: BM (Nat Hist). 1 21. Condé, B. & Schauenberg P. 1969. Rev.Suisse Zool. 76(7). 22. Condé B. & Schauenberg P. 1971. Weight of the European forest wildcat. Rev. Suisse Zool. 78, 295- 315. 23. Condé B. & Schauenberg P. 1974. Reproduction of the forest wildcat (F. silvestris Schreber) in north- eastern France. Rev. Suisse Zool. 81, 45–52. 24. Condé B., Nguyen T. T. C., Vaillant F. & P. Schauenberg 1972. Diet of the forest wildcat (Felis silvestris Schreber) in France. Mammalia 36, 112–119. 25. Corbett L. K. 1979. Feeding ecology and social organization of wildcats (Felis silvestris) and domestic cats (Felis catus) in Scotland. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Aberdeen, Aberdeen. 26. Crovella S., Montagnon D. & Natoli E. 1993. Highly repeated DNA sequences in European wildcat and domestic cat (Carnivora). In Seminar on the biology and conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris), Nancy, France, 23–25 September 1992. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 82-85. 27. Davis A. R. & Gray D. 2010. The distribution of Scottish wildcats (Felis silvestris) in Scotland (2006- 208). Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report, 52 pp. 28. Davis S. J. M. 1987. The archaeology of animals. Batsford, London. 29. Devillard S., Jombart T., Léger F., Pontier D., Say L. & Ruette S. 2014. How reliable are morphological and anatomical characters to distinguish European wildcats, domestic cats and their hybrids in France. Journal of Zoological Systematics and evolutionary Research 52, 154–162. 30. Dimitrijevic S. & Habijan V. 1977. Spreading and numbers of the wild cat Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777 in Vojvodina. Arh. Biol. Nauka., Beograd 29, 175–178. 31. Driscoll C., Yamaguchi N., O’Brien S. J. & Macdonald D. W. 2011. A suite of genetic markers useful in assessing wildcat (Felis silvestris ssp.) – domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) admixture. Journal of Heredity 102, 87–90. 32. Driscoll C. & Nowell K. 2010. Felis silvestris. In IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. 33. Driscoll C. A., Menotti-Raymond M., Roca A. L., Hupe K., Johnson W. E., Geffen E., Harley E. H., Delibes M., Pontier D., Kitchener A. C., Yamaguchi N., O’Brien S. J. & Macdonald D. W. 2007. The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication. Science 317, 519-523. 34. Easterbee N., Hepburn L. V. & Jefferies D. J. 1991. Survey of the status and distribution of the wildcat in Scotland, 1983–1987. Unpubl. report, Nature Conservancy Council for Scotland, Peterborough. 35. Eckert I., Suchentrunk F., Markov G. & Hartl G. B. 2010. Genetic diversity and intergrity of German wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations as revealed by microsatellites, allozymes, and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mammalian Biology 75,160-74. 36. Eichholzer A. 2010. Testing the applicability of pictures taken by camera-traps for monitoring the European wildcat Felis silvestris silvestris in the Jura Mountains of Switzerland. University of Zürich, Switzerland. pp. 37. 37. Fernandes M. L. 1993. Some aspects of the ecology and systematics of the wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Portugal. In Seminar on the biology and conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris), Nancy, France, 23–25 September 1992. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 89–93. 38. Genovesi P. & Boitani L. 1993. Spacing patterns and activity rhythms of a wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Italy. In Seminar on the biology and conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris), Nancy, France, 23–25 September 1992. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 98-101. 39. Germain E., Ruette S. & Poulle M.-L. 2009. Likeness between the food habits of Europe an wildcats, domestic cats and their hybrids in France. Mammalian Biology 74, 412–417. 40. Gil-Sánchez J. M., Jaramillo J. & Barea-Azcón J. M. 2015. Strong spatial segregation between wildcats and domestic cats may explain low hybridization rates on the Iberian Peninsula. Zoology 118, 377–385. 41. Green R. 1991. Wild cat species of the world. Basset, Plymouth. 42. Habijan V. & Dimitrijevic S. 1979. Feeding of the wildcat, Felis silvestris Schreber 1777, in Vojvodina. Drugi Kongres Ekologia Jogoslavie (Zagreb): 1447–1456. 2 43. Hartmann S. A., Steyer K., Kraus R. H. S., Segelbacher G. & Nowak C. 2013. Potantial barriers to gene flow in the endangered European wildcat (Felis silvestris). Conservation Genetics 13, 413–426. 44. Hemmer H. 1976. Gestation period and postnatal development in felids. In R.L. Eaton, ed. The world’s cats 3. Carnivore Research Institute, Univ. Washington, Seattle, 143–165. 45. Hemmer H., Heptner V. G. & Sludskij A. A. 1980. Mammals of the Soviet Union. Vol III: Carnivores (Feloidea). Gustav Fischer, Jena. 46. Hertwig S. T., Schweizer M., Stepanow S., Jungnickel A., Bohle U. R. & Fischer M. S. 2009. Regionally high rates of hybridization and introgression in German wildcat populations (Felis silvestris, Carnivora, Felidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 47, 283–297. 47. Hewson R. 1983. The food of wild cats (Felis silvestris) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in west and north-east Scotland. J. Zool., Lond. 200, 283-289. 48. Hubbard A. L., McOrist S., Jones T. W., Boid R., Scott R. & Easterbee N. 1992. Is survival of European wildcats Felis silvestris in Britain threatened by interbreeding with domestic cats? Biolology Conservation 61, 203–208. 49. Ionescu O. 1993. Wildcat in Romania. In Seminar on the biology and conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris), Nancy, France, 23–25 September 1992. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 57–58. 50. Jerosch S., Götz M., Klar N. & Roth M. 2010. Characteristics of diurnal resting sites of the endangered European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris): Implications for its conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation 18(1), 45–54. 51. Jerosch S., Götz M. & Roth M. 2017. Spatial organisation of European wildcats (Felis silvestris silvestris) in an agriculturally dominated landscape in Central Europe. Mammalian Biology 82, 8–16. 52. Jerosch S., Kramer-Schadt S., Götz M. & Roth M. 2018. The importance of small-scale structures in an agriculturally dominated landscape for the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) in central Europe and implications for its conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation 41, 88–96. 53. Kilshaw K. 2011. Scottish wildcats. Scottish Natural Heritage. Report 48 pp. 54. Kilshaw K. 2015. Introgression and the current status of the Scottish Wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris). PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, Department of Zoology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation of the Wildcat (Felis Silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the Conservation Status and Assessment of Conservation Activities
    Conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the conservation status and assessment of conservation activities Urs Breitenmoser, Tabea Lanz and Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten February 2019 Wildcat in Scotland – Review of Conservation Status and Activities 2 Cover photo: Wildcat (Felis silvestris) male meets domestic cat female, © L. Geslin. In spring 2018, the Scottish Wildcat Conservation Action Plan Steering Group commissioned the IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group to review the conservation status of the wildcat in Scotland and the implementation of conservation activities so far. The review was done based on the scientific literature and available reports. The designation of the geographical entities in this report, and the representation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The SWCAP Steering Group contact point is Martin Gaywood ([email protected]). Wildcat in Scotland – Review of Conservation Status and Activities 3 List of Content Abbreviations and Acronyms 4 Summary 5 1. Introduction 7 2. History and present status of the wildcat in Scotland – an overview 2.1. History of the wildcat in Great Britain 8 2.2. Present status of the wildcat in Scotland 10 2.3. Threats 13 2.4. Legal status and listing 16 2.5. Characteristics of the Scottish Wildcat 17 2.6. Phylogenetic and taxonomic characteristics 20 3. Recent conservation initiatives and projects 3.1. Conservation planning and initial projects 24 3.2. Scottish Wildcat Action 28 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2002. the Internet Journal
    Vol. 5 / No. 1 Published by Friends of the Monk Seal May 2002 Guest Editorial: The plight of the monk seal Henrique Costa Neves reflects on the monk seal’s remarkable recovery in Madeira after centuries of persecution and near-extinction. International News Hawaiian News Mediterranean News Cover Story: Endgame – the fight for marine protected areas in Turkey by Cem. O. Kiraç and Yalcin Savas. In Focus: Homeward Bound – are monk seals returning to Madeira’s São Lourenço Peninsula? by Alexandros A. Karamanlidis, Rosa Pires, Henrique Costa Neves and Carlos Santos. Guest Editorial: Sun basking seals on Madeira’s Desertas Islands Perspectives: Challenge in the Ionian An interview with Ioannis D. Pantis, President of the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Monachus Science: Bree, P.J.H. van. Notes on the description and the type material of the Hawaiian monk seal or Laysan Seal, Monachus schauinslandi Matschie, 1905. Kiraç, C.O., Y. Savas, H. Güçlüsoy & N.O. Veryeri. Observations on diving behaviour of free ranging Mediterranean monk seals Monachus monachus on Turkish coasts. Monachus Science Posters: Cover Story: MPAs in Turkey – in desperate need of management Androukaki E., E. Fatsea, L. 't Hart, A.D.M.E. Osterhaus, E. Tounta, S. Kotomatas. Growth and development of Mediterranean monk seal pups during rehabilitation. 16th European Cetacean Society Conference, Liège, Belgium, 7-11 April, 2002. Dosi, A., S. Adamantopoulou, P. Dendrinos, S. Kotomatas, E. Tounta, & E. Androukaki. Analysis of heavy metals in blubber and skin of Mediterranean monk seals. 16th European Cetacean Society Conference, Liège, Belgium, 7-11 April, 2002. Letters to the Editor Including – Killing sharks at French Frigate Shoals is unacceptable, by Ian L.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Ecology of the Raccoon Dog (Nyctereutes Procyonoides) in Europe
    A review of the ecology of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Europe Jaap L. Mulder De Holle Bilt 17, NL-3732 HM De Bilt, the Netherlands, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) was introduced from East Asia into the former USSR between 1928 and 1957. Since then it has colonised a large part of Europe and is considered an invasive alien spe- cies. This paper reviews the current knowledge on the ecology of the raccoon dog in Europe, undertaken as a basis for a risk assessment. The raccoon dog is about the size of a red fox (Vulpes vulpes). In autumn it accumulates fat and, in areas with cold winters, it may stay underground for weeks. It does not dig and often uses badger (Meles meles) setts and fox earths for reproduction. Raccoon dogs are monogamous. Each pair occupies a fixed home range the periphery of which often overlaps with that of neighbours. Pre-breeding population density usually is between 0.5 and 1.0 adults/km2. Habitat use is characterised by a preference for shores, wet habitats and deciduous forests. Foraging raccoon dogs move quite slowly, mostly staying in cover. They are omnivorous gatherers rather than hunters. Their diet is variable, with amphibians, small mammals, carrion, maize and fruits being important components. There is no proof of a negative effect on their prey populations. Raccoon dogs produce a relatively large litter of usually 6 to 9 cubs. After six weeks the den is left and the whole family roams around. From July onwards the cubs, still only half grown, start to disperse.
    [Show full text]
  • Felis Silvestris, Wild Cat
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T60354712A50652361 Felis silvestris, Wild Cat Assessment by: Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A., Driscoll, C. & Nussberger, B. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A., Driscoll, C. & Nussberger, B. 2015. Felis silvestris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T60354712A50652361. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T60354712A50652361.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A
    s l a m m a y t T i M S N v I i A e G t A n i p E S r a A C a C E H n T M i THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity The Humane Society of the United State s/ World Society for the Protection of Animals 2009 1 1 1 2 0 A M , n o t s o g B r o . 1 a 0 s 2 u - e a t i p s u S w , t e e r t S h t u o S 9 8 THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A. Rose, E.C.M. Parsons, and Richard Farinato, 4th edition Editors: Naomi A. Rose and Debra Firmani, 4th edition ©2009 The Humane Society of the United States and the World Society for the Protection of Animals. All rights reserved. ©2008 The HSUS. All rights reserved. Printed on recycled paper, acid free and elemental chlorine free, with soy-based ink. Cover: ©iStockphoto.com/Ying Ying Wong Overview n the debate over marine mammals in captivity, the of the natural environment. The truth is that marine mammals have evolved physically and behaviorally to survive these rigors. public display industry maintains that marine mammal For example, nearly every kind of marine mammal, from sea lion Iexhibits serve a valuable conservation function, people to dolphin, travels large distances daily in a search for food. In learn important information from seeing live animals, and captivity, natural feeding and foraging patterns are completely lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Behaviour of European Wildcats in Species Specific Enclosures
    Symposium Biology and Conservation of the European Wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) Germany January 21st –23rd 2005 Abstracts Mathias Herrmann, Hof 30, 16247 Parlow, [email protected], Mobil: ++49 +171 9962910 Introduction More than four years after the last meeting of wildcat experts in Nienover, Germany, the NABU (Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.) invited for a three day symposium on the conservation of the European wildcat. Since the last meeting the knowledge on wildcat ecology increased a lot due to the field work of several research teams. The aim of the symposium was to bring these teams together to discuss especially questions which could not be solved by one single team due to limited number of observed individuals or special landscape features. The focus was set on the following questions: 1) Hybridization and risk of infection by domestic cat - a threat to wild living populations? 2) Reproductive success, mating behaviour, and life span - what strategy do wildcats have? 3) ffh - reports/ monitoring - which methods should be used? 4) Habitat utilization in different landscapes - species of forest or semi-open landscape? 5) Conservation of the wildcat - which measures are practicable? 6) Migrations - do wildcats have juvenile dispersal? 75 Experts from 9 European countries came to Fischbach within the transboundary Biosphere Reserve "Vosges du Nord - Pfälzerwald" to discuss distribution, ecology and behaviour of this rare species. The symposium was organized by one single person - Dr. Mathias Herrmann - and consisted of oral presentations, posters and different workshops. 2 Scientific program Friday Jan 21st 8:00 – 10:30 registration /optional: Morning excursion to the core area of the biosphere reserve 10:30 Genot, J-C., Stein, R., Simon, L.
    [Show full text]
  • African Wildcat 1 African Wildcat
    African Wildcat 1 African Wildcat African Wildcat[1] Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Felis Species: F. silvestris Subspecies: F. s. lybica Trinomial name Felis silvestris lybica Forster, 1770 The African wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica), also known as the desert cat, and Vaalboskat (Vaal-forest-cat) in Afrikaans, is a subspecies of the wildcat (F. silvestris). They appear to have diverged from the other subspecies about 131,000 years ago.[2] Some individual F. s. lybica were first domesticated about 10,000 years ago in the Middle East, and are among the ancestors of the domestic cat. Remains of domesticated cats have been included in human burials as far back as 9,500 years ago in Cyprus.[3] [4] Physical characteristics The African wildcat is sandy brown to yellow-grey in color, with black stripes on the tail. The fur is shorter than that of the European subspecies. It is also considerably smaller: the head-body length is 45 to 75 cm (17.7 to 29.5 inches), the tail 20 to 38 cm (7.87 to 15 inches), and the weight ranges from 3 to 6.5 kg (6.61 to 14.3 lbs). Distribution and habitat The African wildcat is found in Africa and in the Middle East, in a wide range of habitats: steppes, savannas and bushland. The sand cat (Felis margarita) is the species found in even more arid areas. Skull African Wildcat 2 Behaviour The African wildcat eats primarily mice, rats and other small mammals. When the opportunity arises, it also eats birds, reptiles, amphibians, and insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Mountain Cat 1 Chinese Mountain Cat
    Chinese mountain cat 1 Chinese mountain cat Chinese Mountain Cat[1] Conservation status [2] Vulnerable (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Felis Species: F. bieti Binomial name Felis bieti Milne-Edwards, 1892 Distribution of the Chinese Mountain Cat (in green) The Chinese Mountain Cat (Felis bieti), also known as the Chinese Desert Cat, is a small wild cat of western China. It is the least known member of the genus Felis, the common cats. A 2007 DNA study found that it is a subspecies of Felis silvestris; should the scientific community accept this result, this cat would be reclassified as Felis silvestris bieti.[3] Some authorities regard the chutuchta and vellerosa subspecies of the Wildcat as Chinese Mountain Cat subspecies.[1] Chinese mountain cat 2 Description Except for the colour of its fur, this cat resembles a European Wildcat in its physical appearance. It is 27–33 in (69–84 cm) long, plus a 11.5–16 in (29–41 cm) tail. The adult weight can range from 6.5 to 9 kilograms (14 to 20 lb). They have a relatively broad skull, and long hair growing between the pads of their feet.[4] The fur is sand-coloured with dark guard hairs; the underside is whitish, legs and tail bear black rings. In addition there are faint dark horizontal stripes on the face and legs, which may be hardly visible. The ears and tail have black tips, and there are also a few dark bands on the tail.[4] Distribution and ecology The Chinese Mountain Cat is endemic to China and has a limited distribution over the northeastern parts of the Tibetan Plateau in Qinghai and northern Sichuan.[5] It inhabits sparsely-wooded forests and shrublands,[4] and is occasionally found in true deserts.
    [Show full text]
  • Serval Fact Sheet
    Right 50mm Fore Right 50mm Hind SERVAL FAST FACTS DESCRIPTION Scientific Name: Leptailurus serval Servals have an elongated neck, very long legs, and very large Conversation Status: Least concern ears on a small, delicate skull. Their coat is pale yellow, with black markings consisting either of large spots that tend to merge Body Length: 59 - 92cm into longitudinal stripes on the neck and back. The underside is whitish grey or yellowish. Their skull is more elongated than Weight: 12 - 18kg most cats. The ears are broad based, high on the head and Gestation: 67 - 79 days close together, with black backs and a very distinct white eye spot. The tail is relatively short, only about one third of the Number of Young: 1 - 4 body length, and has a number of black rings along it. Habitat: Well-watered savanna long- grass environments, particularly reed beds DIET and other riparian habitats. Rodents, birds, reptiles, frogs, insects and other species smaller than they are. Distribution: Servals live throughout most of sub-Saharan Africa (except the central BEHAVIOUR African rainforest), the deserts and plains of Namibia, and most of Botswana and South Servals locate prey in tall grass and reeds primarily by Africa. sound and make a characteristic high leap as they jump on their prey, striking it on impact to prevent escape in thick vegetation. They also use vertical leaps to seize bird and insect prey by “clapping” the front paws together or striking a downward blow. From a standing start a serval can leap 3m vertically into the air to catch birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Predators Appropriating the Refugia of Their Prey
    Mamm Res (2015) 60:285–292 DOI 10.1007/s13364-015-0236-y ORIGINAL PAPER When prey provide more than food: mammalian predators appropriating the refugia of their prey William J. Zielinski 1 Received: 30 September 2014 /Accepted: 20 July 2015 /Published online: 31 July 2015 # Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland (outside the USA) 2015 Abstract Some mammalian predators acquire both food and predators) may play disproportionately important roles in their shelter from their prey, by eating them and using the refugia communities. the prey construct. I searched the literature for examples of predators that exhibit this behavior and summarize their taxo- Keywords Predator–prey . Dens . Herbivore . Behavior . nomic affiliations, relative sizes, and distributions. I hypothe- Habitat . Resting . Foraging sized that size ratios of species involved in this dynamic would be near 1.0, and that most of these interactions would occur at intermediate and high latitudes. Seventeen species of Introduction Carnivorans exploited at least 23 species of herbivores as food and for their refugia. Most of them (76.4 %) were in the Mammals require food and most require shelter, either to pro- Mustelidae; several small species of canids and a few tect them from predators or from thermal stress. Carnivorous herpestids were exceptions. Surprisingly, the average mammals are unique in that they subsist on mobile food predator/prey weight ratio was 10.51, but few species of pred- sources which, particularly if these sources are vertebrates, ators were more than ten times the weight of the prey whose may build their own refuges to help regulate their body tem- refugia they exploit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Customs Guide to Alaska Native Arts
    What International travellers, shop owners and artisans need to know A Customs Guide to Alaska Native Arts Photo Credits: Alaska Native Arts Foundation Updated: June 2012 Table of Contents Cover Page Art Credits……………………………………….……………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………24 USING THE GUIDE ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 MARINE MAMMAL HANDICRAFTS - Significantly Altered .............................................................................................................. 3 COUNTRY INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 In General (For countries other than those listed specifically in this guide) ............................................................................... 4 Australia ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Canada ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 European Union .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pallas's Cat Status Review & Conservation Strategy
    ISSN 1027-2992 I Special Issue I N° 13 | Spring 2019 Pallas'sCAT cat Status Reviewnews & Conservation Strategy 02 CATnews is the newsletter of the Cat Specialist Group, Editors: Christine & Urs Breitenmoser a component of the Species Survival Commission SSC of the Co-chairs IUCN/SSC International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). It is pub- Cat Specialist Group lished twice a year, and is available to members and the Friends of KORA, Thunstrasse 31, 3074 Muri, the Cat Group. Switzerland Tel ++41(31) 951 90 20 For joining the Friends of the Cat Group please contact Fax ++41(31) 951 90 40 Christine Breitenmoser at [email protected] <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Original contributions and short notes about wild cats are welcome Send contributions and observations to Associate Editors: Tabea Lanz [email protected]. Guidelines for authors are available at www.catsg.org/catnews This Special Issue of CATnews has been produced with Cover Photo: Camera trap picture of manul in the support from the Taiwan Council of Agriculture's Forestry Bureau, Kotbas Hills, Kazakhstan, 20. July 2016 Fondation Segré, AZA Felid TAG and Zoo Leipzig. (Photo A. Barashkova, I Smelansky, Sibecocenter) Design: barbara surber, werk’sdesign gmbh Layout: Tabea Lanz and Christine Breitenmoser Print: Stämpfli AG, Bern, Switzerland ISSN 1027-2992 © IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group The designation of the geographical entities in this publication, and the representation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]