DOCSLIB.ORG

Reproduction and Behaviour of European Wildcats in Species Specific Enclosures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Symposium Biology and Conservation of the European Wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) Germany January 21st –23rd 2005 Abstracts Mathias Herrmann, Hof 30, 16247 Parlow, [email protected], Mobil: ++49 +171 9962910 Introduction More than four years after the last meeting of wildcat experts in Nienover, Germany, the NABU (Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.) invited for a three day symposium on the conservation of the European wildcat. Since the last meeting the knowledge on wildcat ecology increased a lot due to the field work of several research teams. The aim of the symposium was to bring these teams together to discuss especially questions which could not be solved by one single team due to limited number of observed individuals or special landscape features. The focus was set on the following questions: 1) Hybridization and risk of infection by domestic cat - a threat to wild living populations? 2) Reproductive success, mating behaviour, and life span - what strategy do wildcats have? 3) ffh - reports/ monitoring - which methods should be used? 4) Habitat utilization in different landscapes - species of forest or semi-open landscape? 5) Conservation of the wildcat - which measures are practicable? 6) Migrations - do wildcats have juvenile dispersal? 75 Experts from 9 European countries came to Fischbach within the transboundary Biosphere Reserve "Vosges du Nord - Pfälzerwald" to discuss distribution, ecology and behaviour of this rare species. The symposium was organized by one single person - Dr. Mathias Herrmann - and consisted of oral presentations, posters and different workshops. 2 Scientific program Friday Jan 21st 8:00 – 10:30 registration /optional: Morning excursion to the core area of the biosphere reserve 10:30 Genot, J-C., Stein, R., Simon, L. : The transboundary biosphere reserve and the wildcat in Rheinland-Pfalz – opening remarks 11:00 – 12:30 oral presentations Denk, M.: How to evaluate wildcat populations and habitats – a suggestion in the context of the European Habitat Directive Hupe, C.: Situation of the European wildcat in the solling Hartmann, M.: Reproduction and behaviour of European wildcats in species specific enclosures. 12:30 lunch 13:30 – 14:15 oral presentations López-Martín, J.M.; Ruiz-Olmo, J.; Pinyol, C. Martínez, D. & A. Such: Analysis of viability to reintroduction of wildcats breeding in captivity. Such, A.; López-Martín, J.M.; Martínez, D. & C. Pinyol: Effects of captive environment and release techniques on dispersion movements of reintroduced captive reared wildcats. 14:15 – 16:45 poster session & exchange of literature Klar, N., Herrmann, M. & Jungelen, H.: How do roads affect the spatial behaviour of European wildcats?Goetz, M.: Research on the wildcat in the biosphere reserve “Karstlandschaft Südharz” – first results All participants: actualisation of the map of distribution of the wildcat López-Martín , J. M.: Home range and habitat use by European wildcats in a Mediterranean landscape Weber, D.: The actual map of the wildcat in Switzerland Pinyol, C., Ruiz-Olmo, J, Sánchez, D.: The Vallcalent wildcat captive breeding center: results after 20 years Such, A. & Lopez-Martin, J.M.: Effects of rabbit on the diet of european wildcats in the Mediterranean environments. Monterroso, P.: Spatial distribution of the European wildcat in the Guadiana Valley Natural Park, South Portugal Ferreira, J.: Modelling wildcat distribution in a Portuguese Natura 2000 site (SPA Moura-Barrancos, SE Portugal) Oliveira, R.: Genetic diversity of portuguese wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations and detection of hybridization with domestic cats. Eckert, I.: Conservation genetics of the European wildcat in Germany 3 Surkus, B. & Herrmann, M.: Standorte für Grünbrücken in Deutschland Ballesteros, E.; Lozano, J. & Virgós, E: Wildcat conservation in Spain, current concerns, ongoing research projects in Madrid, Granada and Guadalajara. 16:45 – 18:15 oral presentations Trinzen, M.: Research on the conservation of the wildcat at the German- Belgium frontier Büttner, I.: Excursions of radio-tracked wildcat during mating season Thiel, C.: Spacing patterns and habitat use of wildcats in the Eifel. 18:30 dinner 19:30 Exchange about methods and techniques Saturday Jan 22nd 8:45 – 10:30 oral presentations Herrmann, M.: Ecological strategies of wildcat populations Klar, N.: Wildcats in the Eifel – Why are they bound to forest Skrbinsek, T.: Trapping, handling and anasthesia of free living wildcats in the Dinaric part of Slovenia Potocnik, H.: Wildcat habitat utilization in the region of Dinaric mountains (Slovenia) 10:45 – 12:30 discussion forum (parallel sessions) Trinzen, M.: adaptations – how flexible is the wildcat? Herrmann, M.: Summarizing data on life span, reproduction and mortality of free living wildcat – the need of cooperation Peppers, C.: Wildkatzentourismus? Eine reale Gefahr? 12:30 - 13:30 lunch 13:30 – 14:30 oral presentations Moelich, Th.: "The project >>A Habitat Network for the Wildcat<<" Djabalameli, J.: Hair Catching with the aid of the “Lure stick”. Proof of wildcat existance by genetic analysis Boehle, U.-R.: 20 years of wildcat conservation in bavaria – a validation by molecular methods 15:00 – 16:00 oral presentations Lienard, E.: Genetic variability of Toxocara cati infected european wildcat and domestic cat. First results Germain, E.: Ecological and Ethological Factors Conducive to the Hybridization of the Wildcat and the Domestic Cat Herrmann, M.: Measurements for wildcat protection in regular forestry 16:15 – 18:30 forum of discussion, parallel 4 Huck, M.: Hybridisierung von Wildkatze und Hauskatze Simon, O.; Hupe, C.; Trinzen, M.: Mögliche Methoden zur Erfassung und Bewertung von Wildkatzenvorkommen im Rahmen der FFH-Richtlinie Weber, D. & N. Klar: Spatial and social organization of a wildcat population 18:30 dinner 19:30 video-projection Trinzen, M. & Büttner, I.: Hunters of microtids Sunday Jan 23rd 8:45 – 10:00 results of the forum of discussion 10:15 – 12:00 oral presentations in German (engl. abstract) Jungelen, H.: Erfahrungen mit Wildkatzenschutzmaßnahmen beim Neubau einer Bundesautobahn. Hötzel, M.: Drei Jahre intensiver Beobachtung einer weiblichen Wildkatze in der Eifel Raimer, F.: Wildkatze und Luchs – Koexistenz zweier Katzenarten final remarks – the organizer 5 Index The Wildcat in the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve (TBR) “Pfälzerwald – Vosges du Nord“ _____________________________________________ 8 How to assess wildcat populations and habitats – a suggestion in the context of the European Habitats Directive ______________________________ 10 Genetic variability of Toxocara cati infecting European wildcats and domestic cats ______________________________________________________ 11 Situation of the european wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) in the Solling 12 Reproduction and behaviour of European wildcats in species-specific enclosures _________________________________________________ 13 Genetic diversity of portuguese wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations and detection of hybridization with domestic cats ______________________ 14 Modelling wild cat (Felis silvestris) distribution in a Portuguese Natura 2000 Site (SPA Moura-Barrancos, SE Portugal) ________________________ 15 Conservation genetics of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) in Germany __________________________________________________ 16 Spatial distribution of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Vale do Guadiana Natural Park, South Portugal __________________________ 17 Wildcats in the southern Eifel: Why are they bound to forests? ________ 18 Trapping, handling and anaesthesia of free living wildcats in the dinaric part of Slovenia_________________________________________________ 19 Wildcats’ habitat utilization in the region of the Dinaric Mountains (Slovenia) _________________________________________________________ 20 Spacing patterns and habitat use of wildcats in the Eifel _____________ 21 Ecological and Ethological Factors Conducive to the Hybridization of the Wildcat and the Domestic Cat __________________________________ 23 Three years of intensive observation on one female wildcat – habitat preferences and other topics___________________________________ 24 Preliminary results on habitat preferences of a wildcat (Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777) population in an area of south of Spain: influence of rabbit distribution and abundance ____________________________________ 25 20 years of wildcat reintroduction in Bavaria: A validation by molecular techniques _________________________________________________ 26 EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CAPTIVE ENVIRONMENTS AND RELEASE TECHNIQUES ON DISPERSION MOVEMENTS OF RELEASED CAPTIVE- REARED WILDCATS (Felis silvestris). ___________________________ 27 Hair catching with the aid of the „Lure Stick“. Proof of wildcat (Felis silvestris) existence by genetic analysis. A Project by BUND and Bayerisches Landesamt für Umweltschutz __________________________________ 28 Wildcat (Felis silvestris) research in the biosphere reserve “Karstlandschaft Südharz” – FIRST RESULTS –_________________________________ 29 6 Experiences with measures for the protection of wildcats connected with the new building of a German motorway (autobahn) ___________________ 30 Luchs und Wildkatze - Koexistenz zweier Katzenarten_______________ 33 How do roads affect the spatial behaviour of European wildcats?______ 38 Summary of the discussion forum "Hybridization between wildcats and (feral)domestic cats" _________________________________________ 39 Workshop on social and spatial
Recommended publications
  • Conservation of the Wildcat (Felis Silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the Conservation Status and Assessment of Conservation Activities

    Conservation of the Wildcat (Felis Silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the Conservation Status and Assessment of Conservation Activities

    Conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the conservation status and assessment of conservation activities Urs Breitenmoser, Tabea Lanz and Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten February 2019 Wildcat in Scotland – Review of Conservation Status and Activities 2 Cover photo: Wildcat (Felis silvestris) male meets domestic cat female, © L. Geslin. In spring 2018, the Scottish Wildcat Conservation Action Plan Steering Group commissioned the IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group to review the conservation status of the wildcat in Scotland and the implementation of conservation activities so far. The review was done based on the scientific literature and available reports. The designation of the geographical entities in this report, and the representation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The SWCAP Steering Group contact point is Martin Gaywood ([email protected]). Wildcat in Scotland – Review of Conservation Status and Activities 3 List of Content Abbreviations and Acronyms 4 Summary 5 1. Introduction 7 2. History and present status of the wildcat in Scotland – an overview 2.1. History of the wildcat in Great Britain 8 2.2. Present status of the wildcat in Scotland 10 2.3. Threats 13 2.4. Legal status and listing 16 2.5. Characteristics of the Scottish Wildcat 17 2.6. Phylogenetic and taxonomic characteristics 20 3. Recent conservation initiatives and projects 3.1. Conservation planning and initial projects 24 3.2. Scottish Wildcat Action 28 3.3.
  • Project FFH-Impact: Implementing the Habitats Directive in German Forests

    Project FFH-Impact: Implementing the Habitats Directive in German Forests

    WORK REPORT Project FFH-Impact: Implementing the Habitats Directive in German forests Executive summary of a case study on the economic and natural impacts on forest enterprises Bernd Wippel, Gero Becker, Björn Seintsch, Lydia Rosenkranz, Hermann Englert, Matthias Dieter, Bernhard Möhring, Josef Stratmann, Johannes Gerst, Marian Paschke and Daniela Riedinger Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics in cooperation with Becker, Borchers and Wippel consultancy, the De- partment for Forest Economics and Forest Inventory of the University of Göttingen and the Faculty of Law of the Uni- versity of Hamburg. Zentrum Holzwirtschaft No. 01/2013 Universität Hamburg Johann Heinrich von Thuenen-Institute Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics Visiting address: Leuschnerstr. 91, 21031 Hamburg, Germany Postal address: Postfach 80 02 09, 21002 Hamburg, Germany Tel: 040 / 73962-301 Fax: 040 / 73962-399 Email: [email protected] Internet:http://www.vti.bund.de Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics in cooperation with Becker, Borchers and Wippel consultancy, Department of Forest Economics and Forest Management, University of Göttingen and the Faculty of Law, University of Hamburg Project FFH-Impact: Executive Summary by Bernd Wippel, Gero Becker, Björn Seintsch, Lydia Rosenkranz, Hermann Englert, Matthias Dieter, Bernhard Möhring, Josef Stratmann, Johannes Gerst, Marian Paschke and Daniela Riedinger Work report by the Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics 2013/1 Hamburg, January 2013 Final report of the project Topic: Joint research project:
  • Scientific Support for Successful Implementation of the Natura 2000 Network

    Scientific Support for Successful Implementation of the Natura 2000 Network

    Scientific support for successful implementation of the Natura 2000 network Focus Area B Guidance on the application of existing scientific approaches, methods, tools and knowledge for a better implementation of the Birds and Habitat Directives Environment FOCUS AREA B SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT FOR SUCCESSFUL i IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK Imprint Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the European Commis- sion. The information and views set out in the handbook are Citation those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the Van der Sluis, T. & Schmidt, A.M. (2021). E-BIND Handbook (Part B): Scientific support for successful official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not implementation of the Natura 2000 network. Wageningen Environmental Research/ Ecologic Institute /Milieu guarantee the accuracy of the data included. The Commission Ltd. Wageningen, The Netherlands. or any person acting on the Commission’s behalf cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information Authors contained therein. Lead authors: This handbook has been prepared under a contract with the Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay (Monitoring of species and habitats within and beyond Natura 2000 sites) European Commission, in cooperation with relevant stakehold- Sander Mücher, Gerard Hazeu (Remote sensing techniques for the monitoring of Natura 2000 sites) ers. (EU Service contract Nr. 07.027740/2018/783031/ENV.D.3 Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay, Rene Henkens, Peter Verweij (Access to data and information) for evidence-based improvements in the Birds and Habitat Kris Decleer, Rienk-Jan Bijlsma (Guidance and tools for effective restoration measures for species and habitats) directives (BHD) implementation: systematic review and meta- Theo van der Sluis, Rob Jongman (Green Infrastructure and network coherence) analysis).
  • The EU Birds and Habitats Directives for Nature and People in Europe

    The EU Birds and Habitats Directives for Nature and People in Europe

    The EU Birds and Habitats Directives For nature and people in Europe Environment European Commission Environment Directorate General Author: Kerstin Sundseth, Ecosystems LTD, Brussels Commission coordinator: Sylvia Barova, European Commission, Natura 2000 unit B.3, – B-1049 Brussels Graphic design: NatureBureau, United Kingdom. www.naturebureau.co.uk Additional information on Natura 2000 is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers and these may be billed Additional information on the European Union is available at: http://europa.eu © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged The photos are copyrighted and cannot be used without prior approval from the photographers Printed in Belgium Printed on recycled paper that has been awarded the EU eco-label for graphic paper (http://ec.europa; eu/ecolabel) Cover photo: Puffins, Fratercula arctica, on Farne Islands, Scotland, UK © Hans Christoph Kappel/naturepl.com Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union, 2014 3 Contents 4–5 Europe’s biodiversity – a rich natural heritage 6–7 An invaluable resource for society 8–9 Europe’s biodiversity – under threat 10–11 EU nature legislation – a unique partnership 12–13 Scope and objective 14–15 Key requirements 16–17 Species protection 18–19 The Natura 2000 Network – a coordinated ecological network 20–21 Site designation 22–23 Managing Natura 2000 sites 24–25 Natura 2000 – part of a living landscape 26–27 Promoting sustainable development 28–29 Natura 2000 permits for new plans and projects 30–31 Investing in the future for the benefit of nature and people 32–33 The challenges ahead 35 Further information and photographers’ credits 4 5 Europe’s biodiversity – a rich natural heritage Europe covers less than 5% of the planet’s land mass.
  • Sweden's Biodiversity at Risk: a Call to Action

    Sweden's Biodiversity at Risk: a Call to Action

    Sweden’s biodiversity at risk A call for action Sweden hosts a large proportion of the species that are threatened at the European level, and has the important responsibility for protecting these species within its territory. Species in Sweden require greater action to improve their status. While many species already receive some conservation attention, others do not. Species can be saved from extinction but this requires a combination of sound research and carefully coordinated efforts. Sweden as an EU Member State has committed to halting biodiversity loss by 2020 but urgent action is needed to meet this target and better monitoring capacity is required to measure if the target is met. Considerable conservation investment is needed from Sweden to ensure that the status of European species improves in the long term. This document provides an overview of the conservation status of species in Sweden based on the results of all European Red Lists completed to date. It does not provide the status of the species in the country, therefore we invite the reader to cross check national and sub- national Red Lists. Together, they can be used to help guide policies and local conservation strategies. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES ™ The European Red List The European Red List of Species is a review of the conservation status of more than 6,000 species in Europe according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria and the regional Red Listing guidelines. It identifies species that are threatened with extinction at the European level so that appropriate conservation actions can be taken to improve their status.
  • Felis Silvestris, Wild Cat

    Felis Silvestris, Wild Cat

    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T60354712A50652361 Felis silvestris, Wild Cat Assessment by: Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A., Driscoll, C. & Nussberger, B. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A., Driscoll, C. & Nussberger, B. 2015. Felis silvestris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T60354712A50652361. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T60354712A50652361.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information
  • Chinese Mountain Cat 1 Chinese Mountain Cat

    Chinese Mountain Cat 1 Chinese Mountain Cat

    Chinese mountain cat 1 Chinese mountain cat Chinese Mountain Cat[1] Conservation status [2] Vulnerable (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Felis Species: F. bieti Binomial name Felis bieti Milne-Edwards, 1892 Distribution of the Chinese Mountain Cat (in green) The Chinese Mountain Cat (Felis bieti), also known as the Chinese Desert Cat, is a small wild cat of western China. It is the least known member of the genus Felis, the common cats. A 2007 DNA study found that it is a subspecies of Felis silvestris; should the scientific community accept this result, this cat would be reclassified as Felis silvestris bieti.[3] Some authorities regard the chutuchta and vellerosa subspecies of the Wildcat as Chinese Mountain Cat subspecies.[1] Chinese mountain cat 2 Description Except for the colour of its fur, this cat resembles a European Wildcat in its physical appearance. It is 27–33 in (69–84 cm) long, plus a 11.5–16 in (29–41 cm) tail. The adult weight can range from 6.5 to 9 kilograms (14 to 20 lb). They have a relatively broad skull, and long hair growing between the pads of their feet.[4] The fur is sand-coloured with dark guard hairs; the underside is whitish, legs and tail bear black rings. In addition there are faint dark horizontal stripes on the face and legs, which may be hardly visible. The ears and tail have black tips, and there are also a few dark bands on the tail.[4] Distribution and ecology The Chinese Mountain Cat is endemic to China and has a limited distribution over the northeastern parts of the Tibetan Plateau in Qinghai and northern Sichuan.[5] It inhabits sparsely-wooded forests and shrublands,[4] and is occasionally found in true deserts.
  • Zoonotic Diseases Associated with Free-Roaming Cats R

    Zoonotic Diseases Associated with Free-Roaming Cats R

    Zoonoses and Public Health REVIEW ARTICLE Zoonotic Diseases Associated with Free-Roaming Cats R. W. Gerhold1 and D. A. Jessup2 1 Center for Wildlife Health, Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA 2 California Department of Fish and Game (retired), Santa Cruz, CA, USA Impacts • Free-roaming cats are an important source of zoonotic diseases including rabies, Toxoplasma gondii, cutaneous larval migrans, tularemia and plague. • Free-roaming cats account for the most cases of human rabies exposure among domestic animals and account for approximately 1/3 of rabies post- exposure prophylaxis treatments in humans in the United States. • Trap–neuter–release (TNR) programmes may lead to increased naı¨ve populations of cats that can serve as a source of zoonotic diseases. Keywords: Summary Cutaneous larval migrans; free-roaming cats; rabies; toxoplasmosis; zoonoses Free-roaming cat populations have been identified as a significant public health threat and are a source for several zoonotic diseases including rabies, Correspondence: toxoplasmosis, cutaneous larval migrans because of various nematode parasites, R. Gerhold. Center for Wildlife Health, plague, tularemia and murine typhus. Several of these diseases are reported to Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and cause mortality in humans and can cause other important health issues includ- Fisheries, The University of Tennessee, ing abortion, blindness, pruritic skin rashes and other various symptoms. A Knoxville, TN 37996-4563, USA. Tel.: 865 974 0465; Fax: 865-974-0465; E-mail: recent case of rabies in a young girl from California that likely was transmitted [email protected] by a free-roaming cat underscores that free-roaming cats can be a source of zoonotic diseases.
  • Im Weserbergland

    Im Weserbergland

    2021 UrlaubIM WESERBERGLAND Herausgeber: Weserbergland Tourismus e. V. Postfach 10 03 39 31753 Hameln Fon 05151/9300-0 [email protected] www.weserbergland-tourismus.de ausgezeichnet WWW.WESERBERGLAND-TOURISMUS.DE mit dem Gütesiegel: Das Weserbergland auf einen Blick. LIEBE GÄSTE, Fachwerk und Weserrenaissance, Burgen und Schlösser sowie die eindrucksvolle Natur mit sanften Hügeln und die durch die Region fließende Weser - all das zeichnet das Weserbergland aus. Unsere Urlaubsregion erstreckt sich von Hann. Münden im Süden bis Porta Westfalica im Norden und bietet A2 Porta Westfalica eine Reihe einzigartiger Erlebnisse für Ihre nächste Reise. Wie wäre es Elze beispielsweise mit einer Radreise auf A2 Gronau dem ausgezeichneten Weser-Radweg Eime entlang der Weser? Sie schnüren lieber W e s die Wanderschuhe? Kein Problem! e r Duingen b Lamspringe Dann erwandern Sie doch einen der e Alfeld zertifizierten Qualitätswanderwege wie r zum Beispiel den Weserbergland-Weg g Freden oder den Ith-Hils-Weg. l a Auch Kulturliebhaber kommen bei n uns auf ihre Kosten: Sie können sich d auf die Spuren der historischen Städte und Stätten begeben und in die über 1.000-jährige Geschichte des Weserberglandes eintauchen. Entspannung und Ruhe sowie Wesertal genussvolle Momente sollen bei Ihrem Aufenthalt natürlich nicht zu kurz kommen und können in den Kur- und Heilbädern oder bei kulinarischen Ausflügen genossen werden. Ganz gleich, was Sie bei uns erleben möchten: das Weserbergland ist zu jeder Jahreszeit eine Reise wert! Wir freuen uns auf Ihren Besuch und wünschen Ihnen eine erlebnisreiche Zeit! 2 IHRE URLAUBSTHEMEN IHRE FERIENORTE Bad Karlshafen .......................................16 RADFAHREN Bad Pyrmont ............................................17 Weser-Radweg & Co.
  • Contagious Pets

    Contagious Pets

    Bellwether Magazine Volume 1 Number 72 Spring 2010 Article 5 Spring 2010 Contagious Pets Kelly Stratton University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/bellwether Recommended Citation Stratton, Kelly (2010) "Contagious Pets," Bellwether Magazine: Vol. 1 : No. 72 , Article 5. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/bellwether/vol1/iss72/5 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/bellwether/vol1/iss72/5 For more information, please contact [email protected]. contagiouspets by kelly stratton Being aware of zoonotic diseases – those that can be passed from animal to owner – is the first step in staying healthy The World Health Organization (WHO) defines “zoonoses” it may also be a sign of a curable neurological or even a disorder as “a group of infectious diseases that are naturally transmitted of the jaw.” between vertebrate animals and humans.” More than 200 such Abnormally acting wildlife is also something to watch out diseases have been confirmed notes WHO’s site, www.who.int/ for. “Raccoons and skunks may be more people-oriented when en/, and are caused by a variety of agents, including bacteria, they’re infected,” said Dr. Vite. parasites and viruses. Why do we need to know about it? In 2006, there were It’s true – your attention-seeking, ball-fetching best friend can 505 laboratory-confirmed rabid animals in Pennsylvania. Of those, give you more than wet kisses. He can also infect you with these 61 were found in Bucks, Montgomery and Chester counties. not-so-pretty bacteria, viruses and parasites. But, with a little For pets, rabies can be deadly.
  • The African Wild Cat, Felis Silvestris (Forster, 1780) and Synonym Felis Silvestris Cafra (Desmarest, 1822): an Overview

    The African Wild Cat, Felis Silvestris (Forster, 1780) and Synonym Felis Silvestris Cafra (Desmarest, 1822): an Overview

    Chapter 1: General introduction CHAPTER 1 General introduction 1. The African wild cat, Felis silvestris (Forster, 1780) and synonym Felis silvestris cafra (Desmarest, 1822): an overview The African wild cat (Felis silvestris) has a wide distributional range (Fig. 1.1). However there is a paucity of information on all aspects of its biology. Since the wild cat is the ancestor of the domestic cat and they can interbreed and produce fertile offspring, hybridisation with the domestic form may be the biggest threat to the survival of wild cats today (Nowell & Jackson, 1996). 1.1 Phylogenetic relations and taxonomic classification Felid classification has a long and complex history fluctuating between extremes of “splitting” and “lumping” of the species (see historical review by Werdelin in Nowell & Jackson, 1996). Even on the subspecies level there has been considerable debate between the traditional taxonomic approach and the more contemporary approach using knowledge from population biology and genetics (Nowell & Jackson, 1996). The recent revolution in sequencing of genomes and new technologies to probe DNA has lead to the development of valuable new tools and methods for investigating phylogenetic relationships. Consequently, the first clearly resolved Feliday family tree has only recently been constructed (Johnson, Eizirik, Pecon-Slattery, Murphy, Antunes, Teeling & O’Brien, 2006, O’Brien & Johnson, 2007). The 37 felid species were grouped into eight lineages by molecular analysis, consistent with observations that lineages shared morphological, biological, physiological characteristics found only in their group. The recent findings suggest that all modern cats are descended from one of several Pseudaelurus species that lived in Asia around 11 million years ago (O’Brien & Johnson, 2007).
  • Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Infection in Cats

    Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Infection in Cats

    Current Feline Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) Infection in Cats Thank You to Our Generous Sponsors: Printed with an Education Grant from IDEXX Laboratories. Photomicrographs courtesy of Bayer HealthCare. © 2014 American Heartworm Society | PO Box 8266 | Wilmington, DE 19803-8266 | E-mail: [email protected] Current Feline Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) Infection in Cats (revised October 2014) CONTENTS Click on the links below to navigate to each section. Preamble .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 EPIDEMIOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 1. Urban heat island profile. BIOLOGY OF FELINE HEARTWORM INFECTION .................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. The heartworm life cycle. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF FELINE HEARTWORM DISEASE ................................................................................... 5 Figure 3. Microscopic lesions of HARD in the small pulmonary arterioles. Figure 4. Microscopic lesions of HARD in the alveoli. PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Clinical