DOCSLIB.ORG

Media Analysis of the US Election: September 2020 Insights from Pressrelations 2020 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Media Analysis of the US Election: September 2020 Insights from Pressrelations 2020 Contents 2020 Media Analysis of the US Election: September 2020 Insights from pressrelations 2020 Contents Media and opinion leaders Opinion leaders 14 Sentiment and NewsGuard Score 15 Disinformation 17 Introduction Media attention and sentiment 19 Study design 03 Sentiment of the US journalists 20 Methodology 04 Sentiment of the DACH journalists 21 Coverage over time 05 Twitter Donald Trump against Joe Biden: General Time course 23 Media Resonance 06 Twitter baseline data 24 Policy areas and topics 07 Credibility of the linked media 25 US and DACH media: Media presence 09 Most interactive content and peaks 26 US and DACH media: Sentiment 10 Summary and conclusion 27 TV coverage Appendix Time course 11 Media dossier 30 Media attention and sentiment 12 Journalist dossier 55 10/20/2020 2020 Introduction and Study Design In cooperation with the Fraunhofer Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics FKIE and NewsGuard, pressrelations is investigating media coverage of the US election campaign. The credibility of the sources and the role of disinformation are particularly in focus. The joint project consists of a qualitative media analysis that combines human and technical intelligence via a hybrid model. In order to follow the reporting in real time, a fully automated quantitative analysis is also available. The results, based on articles from 426 online media sources from five countries, can be accessed online via a real-time information board: Selected time window of Link to the infoboard qualitative analysis Selected reports from 16 online media sources were coded by pressrelations’ analysts according to qualitative criteria. The selected media included eight US media outlets and eight online media channels from Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DACH), which were analyzed for the period from September 1 to September 30, 2020. In addition, TV coverage from CNN, Fox News, and ARD, as well as tweets by Donald Trump and Joe Biden were analyzed. 10/20/2020 Selected Online and TV Media | USA + DACH | 2020 Introduction and Methodology This analysis includes evaluation and mapping of the media landscape from If a media achieves a lower score than 60, it does not meet the journalistic different perspectives and is based on extensive data collection of media requirements and is marked red. Pages rated as credible receive a green reports made public on the Internet and television. symbol (see p. 15). To deal with the immense amount of news on the US election campaign, the To highlight potential differences in election coverage from trustworthy and manual analysis was carried out on the basis of a representative sample in a untrustworthy sources, four sources evaluated by NewsGuard were selected selected media set of 19 media sources in total. This media set consists of a for both the US media and the DACH media (see p. 29 ff.). Furthermore, in selection of media from the USA and the DACH region with high and low the analysis - whose underlying media set (excluding TV) consists equally of credibility in order to investigate both qualitative and regional differences. media with a Newsguard score above1 and below² 60 - all articles were The representative sample has a confidence interval of 95% and a analyzed for the presence of disinformation. The underlying definition can probability of error of 5%. The sample represents the population in terms of be found e.g. at bpb. If it is an (in-)direct quote from a candidate with false candidates, country distribution, topicality of issues, and media credibility. information, the code "Disinformation: statement by candidate" was used. To All articles that addressed at least one of the four candidates running for the check if it is disinformation, several websites have been used which are US presidency and vice presidency were examined. specialized in detecting, checking, and correcting misinformation (Politifact, In order to measure the degree of credibility and the share of unreliable FactCheck.org, AP News, CNN). information sources in the coverage of the candidates, the credibility and transparency of the source was defined as an essential analysis criterion in addition to the sentiment of the reporting. For this purpose, pressrelations works with the NewsGuard Score - a rating system for news websites. Media pressrelations and its partners are politically independent and do not outlets are analyzed by trained journalists according to nine credibility and support political parties, platforms, campaigns, or candidates. If you have any transparency criteria and evaluated according to a point system. A total of questions, please feel free to contact us. 100 points can be achieved. 10/20/2020 2020 COVERAGE OVER TIME Latino Vote Potentially Decisive, the Danger of Coronavirus and a Disastrous TV Debate Coverage (number of articles) September 2020 Bob Woodward book: Trump contradicts CDC: First debate is chaotic. A "disaster" 800 Trump is said to have "Vaccine for every for viewers played down the danger American by April" Fight for Latino vote in Florida: 700 of the coronavirus Biden in polls behind Neck-and-neck predecessors. Trump releases 600 race is emerging help for hurricane-stricken in Florida Puerto Rico 500 400 300 200 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Donald Trump Mike Pence Joe Biden Kamala Harris 10/20/2020 Selected Online and TV Media | USA + DACH | 2020 MEDIA RESONANCE Trump Dominates the News, Biden has More Positive Coverage in Credible Media Exclusivity Exclusivity August 20% 37% 43% 0% August 15% 36% 47% 2% -2% +/-0% -1% +3% -6% +4% +3% +/-0% Biden Trump September 18% 37% 42% 3% September 9% 40% 50% 2% 11.768 5.982 articles total articles total Exclusive Focus Marginal Mention Exclusive Focus Marginal Mention Reach in billion | Ø Sentiment Reach in billion | Ø Sentiment trustworthy not trustworthy trustworthy not trustworthy USA USA USA USA 47.41 | - 0,22 7.80 | - 0,13 2.83 | 0,15 0.33 | 0,05 22.78 | - 0,03 3.15 | 0,06 1.45 | - 0,37 0.08 | - 0,09 SENTIMENT negative -1 1 positive NEWSGUARD SCORE (SEE APPENDIX) ≥ 60 trustworthy < 60 not trustworthy 10/19/202010/20/2020 Selected Online and TV media | USA + DACH | Sentiment: from -1 to +1 | NG Score: expresses the trustworthiness of a news website on a scale of 0 to 100. Sites with a score under 60 are considered not trustworthy | 2020 POLICY AREAS AND TOPICS National Security and the Election Set the Agenda Policy area Topics Policy area Topics By name & sentiment (%) by name & sentiment (%) By name & sentiment (%) by name & sentiment (%) Biden Trump Domestic policy/domestic security Election Campaign Domestic policy/domestic security Election Campaign Foreign Policy Coronavirus Economy and taxes Coronavirus Miscellaneous Racism/Inequality Economy and taxes Health Policy Racism/Inequality Miscellaneous Health Policy Foreign Policy Election fraud Health of the candidates Defence and Army Environmental Policy Media/Communication Election fraud Environmental Policy Defence and Army Tax documents Tax documents Social Policy Education Disaster Management Disaster Management Immigration Police Reform Social Policy Police Reform Education (Mental) Health Immigration Media/Communication Agricultural Policy Possession of firearms Agricultural Policy Possession of firearms SENTIMENT negative neutral positive 10/20/2020 Selected Online and TV media | USA + DACH | Sentiment: from -1 to +1 | 2020 POLICY AREAS AND TOPICS Coverage of the Candidates Hardly Ever Revolves Around Content The data for September shows no significant shift in the relevant policy The all-important thematic focus is the election campaign itself. areas and issues compared with August. The very high volume of articles Interesting in this context - mental and physical health is one of the top on the TV debate also reflects this discursive idleness. According to 5 topics discussed in connection with Biden; for Trump it is only in tenth viewers, both candidates did not succeed in focusing on their main place in September and plays almost no role at all. A top 5 topic for areas of interest during the debate. Trump that is much less relevant in articles on Biden is electoral fraud - especially as Trump continues to sow doubts about the integrity of Both Trump and Biden appear in the examined media mainly in the mail-in voting. context of the question of national security. In Biden's case, the percentage gap to the following policy areas is even more pronounced The coronavirus pandemic is in second place among the candidates - than in Trump's case, who as incumbent president is mentioned almost very far behind - with the percentage of the topic in coverage of Trump as often in foreign policy contexts. being higher and much more negative. While many mentions of Trump refer to his promise to "keep law and In view of the important Latino voters in the swing state of Florida, the order", Biden - in the wake of the first debate - is often quoted as saying incumbent president lands a media coup in the areas of environmental that Trump should clearly distance himself from nationalist groups like and social policy that also reaches DACH media. On the one hand, the "Proud Boys". Trump signs the extension of a moratorium on oil drilling off the coast of Florida, and on the other hand he surprisingly releases aid for the US As this example shows, Biden was hardly able to generate exclusive state of Puerto Rico, which has still not recovered from the disastrous coverage in September either - compared to the previous month, the consequences of Hurricane Maria in September 2017. figure shrank from 15 to 9 percent. 10/20/2020 PAGE 8 2020 USA VS. DACH Trump Dominates the Discourse - in DACH Even More So Than in the USA Joe Biden's media presence - within the media set- decreased by 1% in the US media.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Gab? a Bastion of Free Speech Or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?
    What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber? Savvas Zannettou Barry Bradlyn Emiliano De Cristofaro Cyprus University of Technology Princeton Center for Theoretical Science University College London [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Haewoon Kwak Michael Sirivianos Gianluca Stringhini Qatar Computing Research Institute Cyprus University of Technology University College London & Hamad Bin Khalifa University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jeremy Blackburn University of Alabama at Birmingham [email protected] ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: Over the past few years, a number of new “fringe” communities, Savvas Zannettou, Barry Bradlyn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Haewoon Kwak, like 4chan or certain subreddits, have gained traction on the Web Michael Sirivianos, Gianluca Stringhini, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2018. What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?. In WWW at a rapid pace. However, more often than not, little is known about ’18 Companion: The 2018 Web Conference Companion, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, how they evolve or what kind of activities they attract, despite France. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558. recent research has shown that they influence how false informa- 3191531 tion reaches mainstream communities. This motivates the need to monitor these communities and analyze their impact on the Web’s information ecosystem. 1 INTRODUCTION In August 2016, a new social network called Gab was created The Web’s information ecosystem is composed of multiple com- as an alternative to Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook, Social Media Privacy, and the Use and Abuse of Data
    S. HRG. 115–683 FACEBOOK, SOCIAL MEDIA PRIVACY, AND THE USE AND ABUSE OF DATA JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE AND THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 10, 2018 Serial No. J–115–40 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:24 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 S:\GPO\DOCS\37801.TXT JACKIE FACEBOOK, SOCIAL MEDIA PRIVACY, AND THE USE AND ABUSE OF DATA VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:24 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 S:\GPO\DOCS\37801.TXT JACKIE S. HRG. 115–683 FACEBOOK, SOCIAL MEDIA PRIVACY, AND THE USE AND ABUSE OF DATA JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE AND THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 10, 2018 Serial No. J–115–40 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 37–801 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:24 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\37801.TXT JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JOHN THUNE, South Dakota, Chairman ROGER WICKER, Mississippi BILL NELSON, Florida, Ranking ROY BLUNT, Missouri MARIA
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Proceedings of the Thirteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2019) Different Spirals of Sameness: A Study of Content Sharing in Mainstream and Alternative Media Benjamin D. Horne,* Jeppe Nørregaard,y Sibel Adalı* Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute*, Technical University of Denmarky [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Vos, and Shoemaker 2009; Allcott and Gentzkow 2017; Mele et al. 2017). Thus, we may have a more diverse set of In this paper, we analyze content sharing between news news to read than in years past, but the standards of quality sources in the alternative and mainstream media using a dataset of 713K articles and 194 sources. We find that content have wavered, creating a new set of concerns. sharing happens in tightly formed communities, and these This rise in low-quality and potentially malicious news communities represent relatively homogeneous portions of producers has been the focus of many recent studies such the media landscape. Through a mix-method analysis, we as those focusing on detecting false content (Potthast et al. find several primary content sharing behaviors. First, we find 2017; Popat et al. 2016; Singhania, Fernandez, and Rao that the vast majority of shared articles are only shared with 2017; Horne et al. 2018; Baly et al. 2018). Some other stud- similar news sources (i.e. same community). Second, we find ies have focused on the tactics used to spread low-quality that despite these echo-chambers of sharing, specific sources, news, such as the use of social bots (Shao et al. 2017) such as The Drudge Report, mix content from both main- stream and conspiracy communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Election Fraud in the 2020 US Election
    2020 Analysis of Election Fraud in the 2020 US Election Insights from pressrelations GmbH Analysis period: 08/01/2016 –11/14/2020 2020 REPORTING OVER TIME The Subject of Election Fraud in US Media In 2016, Trump prepares the ground for his current accusations of election fraud by fraud - especially in the last few days. Starting on Election Day, reporting on the topic speaking of "illegal" votes for the first time. This narrative will be carried over one-to- was initially quite hesitant. The topic was mainly picked up by untrustworthy media one to the mail-in ballots in 2020. The narrative that Democrats wanted to "steal" the outlets. Reliable outlets picked up the topic after November 12th, right after Trump's election comes as a consequence of their call for absentee voting due to the tweet about the "deleted votes". coronavirus pandemic. The various allegations related to the technology for voting and counting votes used by Dominion Voting Systems make up a large part of the discussion about election Coverage on the topic of election fraud by number of contributions: August 2016 - November 2020 6.000 US Election 2020: Trump claims the election was stolen by fraud 5.000 Midterms 2018: Trump 4.000 accuses Democratic Party of US Elections 2016: manipulation of ballots by Trump: "Election could be millions of illegal third parties postponed to prevent mail-in 3.000 immigrants vote, election fraud". according to Donald Trump: "Hillary Clinton won 2.000 Trump 'popular vote' thanks to 3-5 million illegal votes" 1.000 0 Apr Apr Apr Apr Jan
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Tow Center for Digital Journalism CONSERVATIVE A Tow/Knight Report NEWSWORK A Report on the Values and Practices of Online Journalists on the Right Anthony Nadler, A.J. Bauer, and Magda Konieczna Funded by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 7 Boundaries and Tensions Within the Online Conservative News Field 15 Training, Standards, and Practices 41 Columbia Journalism School Conservative Newswork 3 Executive Summary Through much of the 20th century, the U.S. news diet was dominated by journalism outlets that professed to operate according to principles of objectivity and nonpartisan balance. Today, news outlets that openly proclaim a political perspective — conservative, progressive, centrist, or otherwise — are more central to American life than at any time since the first journalism schools opened their doors. Conservative audiences, in particular, express far less trust in mainstream news media than do their liberal counterparts. These divides have contributed to concerns of a “post-truth” age and fanned fears that members of opposing parties no longer agree on basic facts, let alone how to report and interpret the news of the day in a credible fashion. Renewed popularity and commercial viability of openly partisan media in the United States can be traced back to the rise of conservative talk radio in the late 1980s, but the expansion of partisan news outlets has accelerated most rapidly online. This expansion has coincided with debates within many digital newsrooms. Should the ideals journalists adopted in the 20th century be preserved in a digital news landscape? Or must today’s news workers forge new relationships with their publics and find alternatives to traditional notions of journalistic objectivity, fairness, and balance? Despite the centrality of these questions to digital newsrooms, little research on “innovation in journalism” or the “future of news” has explicitly addressed how digital journalists and editors in partisan news organizations are rethinking norms.
    [Show full text]
  • Disinformation, and Influence Campaigns on Twitter 'Fake News'
    Disinformation, ‘Fake News’ and Influence Campaigns on Twitter OCTOBER 2018 Matthew Hindman Vlad Barash George Washington University Graphika Contents Executive Summary . 3 Introduction . 7 A Problem Both Old and New . 9 Defining Fake News Outlets . 13 Bots, Trolls and ‘Cyborgs’ on Twitter . 16 Map Methodology . 19 Election Data and Maps . 22 Election Core Map Election Periphery Map Postelection Map Fake Accounts From Russia’s Most Prominent Troll Farm . 33 Disinformation Campaigns on Twitter: Chronotopes . 34 #NoDAPL #WikiLeaks #SpiritCooking #SyriaHoax #SethRich Conclusion . 43 Bibliography . 45 Notes . 55 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study is one of the largest analyses to date on how fake news spread on Twitter both during and after the 2016 election campaign. Using tools and mapping methods from Graphika, a social media intelligence firm, we study more than 10 million tweets from 700,000 Twitter accounts that linked to more than 600 fake and conspiracy news outlets. Crucially, we study fake and con- spiracy news both before and after the election, allowing us to measure how the fake news ecosystem has evolved since November 2016. Much fake news and disinformation is still being spread on Twitter. Consistent with other research, we find more than 6.6 million tweets linking to fake and conspiracy news publishers in the month before the 2016 election. Yet disinformation continues to be a substantial problem postelection, with 4.0 million tweets linking to fake and conspiracy news publishers found in a 30-day period from mid-March to mid-April 2017. Contrary to claims that fake news is a game of “whack-a-mole,” more than 80 percent of the disinformation accounts in our election maps are still active as this report goes to press.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Commentator Ben Shapiro to Lecture on Campus Nov. 21 Cole Tompkins | Multimedia Editor IT RUNS in the FAMILY Dr
    Baylor Lariat WE’RE THERE WHEN YOU CAN’T BE Tuesday, September 10, 2019 baylorlariat.com Opinion | 2 A&L | 5 Speakers on Year of the Campus e-boys Why Baylor needs The subculture is more speaker growing. It could diversity on campus alter online beauty standards Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro to lecture on campus Nov. 21 Cole Tompkins | Multimedia Editor IT RUNS IN THE FAMILY Dr. Pete Younger and sons often spend their afternoons assembling kits of miscellaneous Lego parts in their family Lego distributory business. TYLER BUI the goal. You bring Ben Shapiro— Staff Writer this is as big as it gets, so I’m thrilled,” Miller said. “Hopefully Ben Shapiro, editor-in-chief [Baylor] will react well, but you Lego connects life, education and founder of The Daily Wire have to prepare for the worst. He and host of “The Ben Shapiro hasn’t had an event on a college Show,” will visit Baylor in campus that hasn’t been rowdy, November as a stop on the Young and I don’t think this will be the for Baylor professor’s family America Foundation’s Fred Allen first.” lecture series. Miller said he hopes Baylor Baylor’s chapter of Young students will attend the lecture DAVID GARZA sorted and organized 108,000 Lego famous Lego artists like Eric Hunter, American’s for Freedom (YAF) regardless of their views. Reporter elements that they list and sell on who has over 43 years of experience applied to be one of the three “If you can get a ticket, come their website.
    [Show full text]
  • MESSIAH My Testimony to Rev
    MESSIAH My Testimony to Rev. Sun Myung Moon Volume II MESSIAH My Testimony to Rev. Sun Myung Moon Volume II Translated by Andrew Lausberg University Press of America,® Inc. Lanham • New York • Oxford Copyright © 2002 by University Press of America,® Inc. 4720 Boston Way Lanham, Maryland 20706 PO Box 317 Oxford OX2 9RU,UK All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America British Library Cataloging in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pak, Bo Hi. Messiah ; my testimony to Rev. Sun Myung Moon / Bo Hi Pak; translated by Andrew Lausberg. p. cm. 1. Pak, Bo Hi. 2. Unificationists—Biography. 3. Moon, Sun Myung. I. Title. BX9750 .S48 P35 2002 289.9'6'092—ec21 (B) 00-06071CIP ISBN 0-7618-1815-4 (v. I: clothbound : alk. ppr.) ISBN 0-7618-2457-X (v. II: clothbound : alk. ppr.) fe? The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48—1984 Dedication This book is dedicated to my spiritual parents, Reverend Sun Myung Moon and Dr. Hak Ja Han Moon, and to my beloved brothers and sisters who are championing the True Parents. CONTENTS Foreword ix Chapter 14 The Making of a Miracle: The U.S. Presidential Election 1 Chapter 15 The Washington Times Pioneers the End of the Cold War 19 Chapter 16 The CAUSA Movement That Shook the Kremlin 77 Chapter 17 Twentieth-Century Crucifixion: Maneuvered Into Prison 97 Chapter 18 The Kidnapping of the Chairman of the Washington Times 185 Chapter 19 The Unsung Hero of Soviet Liberation .
    [Show full text]
  • Ben Shapiro Liberty University Transcript
    Ben Shapiro Liberty University Transcript Coital and medicative Cornellis decolourized her cast-offs kyanised or airlift round. Suburban and shelterless Vite unmade her officiousness cornfield misdescribed and overwearies stickily. Sternal Mohammad always incaged his matzoons if Rudyard is animalcular or outprays fascinatingly. And vaginas and of a basic marxist theory is a weird, crowder and has almost half a known as a shareholder in his audience and ben shapiro The anchor place use it as soon as a took my pictures in what liberty bell. The hood three hours of the Ben Shapiro show exclusive reader's past. Dr Fauci Makes First Appearance at Biden White pine Press Briefing Transcript Global. Political pundit Ben Shapiro defends individual freedom and responsibility April 25 201 By Drew Menard. Conservative Ben Shapiro Tweeted Something or Found. Campaign in liberty university president were both sides was i guarantee cultural characteristics about universities, ben shapiros of liberty to! Ben Shapiro explains in this illuminating video Take their Quiz Facts Sources Transcript. Steele briefed elias weekly dose of. Ian Shapiro is Sterling Professor of Political Science at Yale University. Liberty university of liberty to transcripts are going to pay for each other documents could hear why papadopoulos? Obviously has no. Accepts official transcripts at AU-ETranscriptsauroraedu 3 Letters of. We suddenly not repel one but mine have endeavored to edit this gift for maximum. For all around some prefiguration of individuals close associate who dedicated his interactions between the universities not understand. Several times more nervous that shapiro: the university may have less dependent on? A Jesuit university has blocked a proposed event featuring conservative writer Ben Shapiro citing the possibility of hateful speech by.
    [Show full text]
  • © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang
    © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2020 Reading Committee: W. Lance Bennett, Chair Matthew J. Powers Kirsten A. Foot Adrienne Russell Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Communication University of Washington Abstract The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang Chair of the Supervisory Committee: W. Lance Bennett Department of Communication Democracy in America is threatened by an increased level of false information circulating through online media networks. Previous research has found that radical right media such as Fox News and Breitbart are the principal incubators and distributors of online disinformation. In this dissertation, I draw attention to their political mobilizing logic and propose a new theoretical framework to analyze major radical right media in the U.S. Contrasted with the old partisan media literature that regarded radical right media as partisan news organizations, I argue that media outlets such as Fox News and Breitbart are better understood as hybrid network organizations. This means that many radical right media can function as partisan journalism producers, disinformation distributors, and in many cases political organizations at the same time. They not only provide partisan news reporting but also engage in a variety of political activities such as spreading disinformation, conducting opposition research, contacting voters, and campaigning and fundraising for politicians. In addition, many radical right media are also capable of forming emerging political organization networks that can mobilize resources, coordinate actions, and pursue tangible political goals at strategic moments in response to the changing political environment.
    [Show full text]